Professional Documents
Culture Documents
04 Sayah
04 Sayah
net/publication/324190922
CITATIONS READS
0 128
4 authors:
5 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
Lombardi ltd
38 PUBLICATIONS 424 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Selim M. Sayah on 04 April 2018.
Selim M. Sayah, Dr. ès sciences, Project Manager, Lombardi Eng. Ltd., Minusio/CH
Manfred Thüring, Dr. phil. nat., Geologist, Lombardi Eng. Ltd., Minusio/CH
Marco Braghini, Engineer, Head of Hydraulic Section, Lombardi Eng. Ltd., Minusio/CH
Roger Bremen, Dr. ès sciences techniques, CEO, Lombardi Eng. Ltd., Minusio/CH
1 (a) Dam axis in the Mantaro River, headrace tunnel located on the right-hand side; (b) Valley formation downstream, location of the
underground powerhouse and tailrace tunnel on the right-hand side
Pampas, Colcabamba and Salcabamba districts belonging to ites/granodiorites (Figs. 2a and 2b) [4]. The high grade meta-
Tayacaja Province in the Huancavelica region. morphic rocks belong to the Ambo-Copacabana group of
probably Paleozoic age and are composed of hornfelses,
With regard to the morpho-structural aspects that character- skarns and marbles. The granites/granodiorites belong
ize Peruvian territory, the area is located on the western slopes to the Villa Azul Batholith group, intrusives dated around
of the Oriental Cordillera de los Andes in central Peru on the Cretaceous to Tertiary.
Amazonian watershed (Figs. 1a and 1b). The area can be
reached from Lima along the Central Highway to the town of The intrusive contact between the two bedrock lithologies
Pampas. From this location, an unpaved road passing through is likely to be crossed by the headrace tunnel under an over-
the Colcabamba District and the localities of Andaymarca and burden of 900 m. The dam and the major part of the head-
Durasnuyoc reaches the site area. The powerhouse area is race tunnel are thus in granites/granodiorites, whereas the
accessible on the unpaved road of the Salcabamba District. remaining project structures (smaller part of headrace tun-
nel, pressure shaft, power house, and tailrace tunnel) are in
metamorphic rocks.
2 Site Geology
The tunnels are located in the pre-mesozoic basement of The granites/granodiorites are white to rose coloured with
metamorphic, pelitic to calcareous rocks, intruded by gran- good intact rock properties, but generally of lower quality
than the metamorphic rocks. The rock mass can show a con- or terraces. Particular colluvial deposits, most likely of re-
siderable degree of fracturing and alteration at depth, dete- mobilized slope debris and glacial deposits, of impressive
riorating the rock mass quality. thickness (up to 150 m) can be found in the power house/
tailrace area (Fig. 3). These deposits are organized in a series
The metamorphic rocks are aluminosilicate-rich to carbon- of terraces and composed of a mixture of boulders, cobbles
ate-rich rocks (paragneisses, hornfelses, skarns) with less fre- and gravel in a silty-sandy matrix showing high (short-term)
quent interlayers of amphibolites. These high strength rocks slope stability. The deposits are interlayered by rockslides
of very good intact rock quality generally show good rock at the frontal part of the terraces located at the right bank
mass quality, which in some cases is deteriorated by the local of Río Mantaro, in the area of the initial part of the tailrace
structural conditions. tunnel.
The Quaternary deposits are predominantly of colluvial Fig. 4 shows the geological situation at the project site. The
or alluvial nature. Alluvial deposits are organized as fans dam site and 75 % of the headrace tunnel are in granites/
granodiorites. The headrace tunnel crosses the original intru- underground works and excavation have been com pleted.
sive contact of the granites to the surrounding metamorphic Two adits were built for the headrace tunnel and two
rocks at roughly 4.25 km. The remaining part (25 %) of the adits for the tailrace tunnel. Table 1 shows the main char-
headrace tunnel, the power house, and tailrace tunnel are all acteristics of each scheme. This table also illustrates the
in metamorphic rocks. excavation advance rates for each tunnel. An average rate
of 6.8 m/day was achieved in the main headrace tunnel.
Although the tailrace tunnel has the same section, it was
3 Waterway System and Access Tunnels excavated at a faster rate of around 8.1 m/day. This differ-
3.1 Main Characteristics and Rock Support ence is mainly explained by the fact that the headrace tun-
The main tunnels and schemes of the project are illustrat- nel has sections with more than 1600 m rock overburden
ed in Fig. 5. This corresponds to around 12 km of tunnels and is thus prone to rockburst. This slowed the excavation
excavated using the conventional drill and blast method. rate due to all the support measures that were taken dur-
The project is presently being commissioned and all the ing excavation.
Excavation rate
Waterway Length [m] Section [m2] Rock type
[m/day]
Headrace tunnel 5738 91.5 Granite/Granodiorite/Gneiss 6.8
Upper surge tunnel 483 60 Gneiss 1.8
Pressure shaft (raise bored, D = 4 m) 242 12.56 Gneiss 12.7
Pressure shaft (D & B, D = 10 m) 242 78.5 Gneiss 1.3
High pressure penstock 140 57.3 Gneiss 3.5
Draft tubes (3 tunnels) 280 32 Gneiss –
Lower surge tunnel 647 35.2–91.5 Gneiss –
Tailrace tunnel 1891 91.5 Gneiss 8.1
Derivation tunnel 326 104 Granite 2.7
Access tunnels/cable ways
Adit 1 headrace 95 46.7 Granite 0.8
The pressurized headrace tunnel conveys the water dis- tunnel is similar to that of the headrace tunnel though with a
charge of 210.5 m3/s from the power intake to the pressure smaller area (Table 1). It has a 13 % slope and it is 483 m long.
shaft. It is almost 5.7 km long, with a slope of 0.34 %. The
cross section of the headrace tunnel is illustrated in Fig. 6. The pressure shaft is the vertical connecting element between
It is a simplified horseshoe shape with a horizontal invert. the low pressure headrace tunnel and the high pressure mani-
Fig. 6 also shows the support system of rock type B. fold section. It is 242 m high with an 8 m internal diameter
and a 10 m excavation diameter. Based on several concluding
The excavation of the unlined headrace tunnel was carried hydrojacking tests carried out along the entire height of the
out simultaneously from two adits. The first one is situated shaft, the steel lining of this shaft was omitted. The final lining
at the first Mantaro River curve downstream of the dam axis consists of 1 m thick watertight reinforced concrete.
while the second adit is close to the downstream end of the
tunnel at the connection with the pressure shaft. This adit The manifold is the set of steel-lined high pressure tunnels
was also used to access the upper surge tunnel and the verti- between the vertical shaft and the 3-turbine system. The
cal shaft. Only permanent support measures were applied, internal tunnel diameter decreases from 6.00 m to 3.385 m.
depending on rock quality. This included grouted anchors, The total length of the manifold is around 140 m.
shotcrete and steel ribs. Special protection provisions were
applied in case of rockburst due to the high overburden The tailrace tunnel is about 1.9 km long, sloping down at
(around 1,600 m and the centre of the tunnel). All the rock 0.21 % (Figs. 5 and 7). The typical section of this tunnel is
support classification followed the Q System of Barton. This a replica of the headrace tunnel section. This tunnel is de-
rock classification system was specified in the contract by signed to be a pressurized scheme with a submerged outlet
the owner. Since the tunnel arch is more than 10 m high, a structure. This solution provides better protection of the en-
protective shotcrete layer with a thickness of at least 5 cm tire tailrace system during the passage of floods and allows
was always applied to the arch, even in rock of very good an increase of net head.
quality.
In order to avoid depressurized sections in the upstream part
The aim of the upper surge tunnel (Fig. 7) is to allow free of the tailrace tunnel close to the draft tube outlet during
water oscillation in the tunnel during emergency shut-down simultaneous emergency shut-down of the turbine system,
or start-up of the turbines. During mass oscillation, the a lower surge tunnel was built. The aim of this tunnel is to
maximum and minimum surge levels are 1,570.00 m asl and ensure sufficient head during emergency shut-down of the
1,537.00 m asl, respectively. The tunnel is equipped with an turbine in such a way that the piezometric level in the draft
orifice consisting of a 7 m long and 3.3 x 3.3 m steel-lined tube outlet section connecting to the tailrace tunnel remains
cross section, which enables a reduction of the maximum within an acceptable range. The required surface for mass
surge level by around 10 m. The typical section of the surge oscillation is around 3,000 m².
6 Typical section of the headrace/tailrace system Fig. 9 depicts the grouting scheme that was applied along
the pressure shaft. In the lower high pressure section, around
In the following section, a few highlights of the pressure shaft 76 m of grouting was applied at a high pressure of 40 bar.
design are described. This scheme is of special importance The grouting of this section was independent of rock qual-
since it allows vertical water transfer from the low-pressure ity. The main purpose was to limit water infiltration during
to the high-pressure system where turbines are installed. operation from the shaft to the powerhouse cavern situated
at around 50 m. Moreover, in the middle of the shaft, where
3.2 Pressure Shaft a crossing fault was observed during the primary investiga-
The water tightness of the 242 m high pressure shaft was tion, another section was grouted at a slightly lower pres-
tested by hydrojacking tests in nearby boreholes, which sure of 35 bar. The grouting of this section was intended to
crossed the pressure shaft down to its bottom. increase the rock quality. It should also be mentioned that
4 Rockburst
4.1 Rockburst Analysis and proposed Rock Support
A major concern for the excavation of the headrace tun-
nel was the risk of spalling and rockburst. The tunnel passes
under a maximum overburden of more than 1600 m. The rock
burst risk had been evaluated using the classical approaches,
which relate the compressive strength of the intact rock to the
overburden stress, accounting for the excavation geometry
and the expected in-situ stress condition [6–7].
Fig. 10 shows the first estimate based only on the ratio of the
intact compressive strength and overburden stress for both
lithologies, granites/granodiorites and metamorphic rocks.
According to this and a more detailed evaluation, there was
a considerable risk of rockburst in intact sections, particu-
larly in the granites/granodiorites. For this bedrock lithology,
damage initiation may occur under an overburden of 500 m,
and will then develop to spalling. Rockburst may be present
with an overburden in excess of 1,150 m.
8 Results of the hydrojacking tests made along the entire height Fig. 11 shows the support system (C2) suggested for the sec-
of the pressure shaft tions of the headrace tunnel susceptible to rockburst. This
support system includes systematic cement grouted rock
bolting in the arch as well as in the tunnel walls, reinforce-
ment of the roof with cone bolts and wire mesh, 15 cm of
shotcrete in the entire section and 5 cm of shotcrete to the
tunnel face. This protection was applied systematically when
the rock overburden was above 900 to 1,000 m and rock UCS
higher than 100 MPa. This reduced rockburst and thus avoid-
ed total collapse of the roof and tunnel walls.
• Rock bolts are only grouted after several days. A mechanical • Curved face excavation (convex).
head was used to grip the bolt. • It was noticed that the next 8 hours after the blasting are the
• Steel cages for workers working close to the tunnel most dangerous and when rockburst has mostly occurred.
(shotcrete nozzle man, topography, etc.).
• Areas with limited access (Fig. 13): no access allowed sev- Table 2 lists a detailed description for rockburst identifica-
eral metres from the newly blasted face or to the walls, etc. tion and the measures adopted.
Quelle/credit: Selim M. Sayah
11 Proposed rock support of tunnel sections prone to rock burst 12 Rockburst event in the headrace tunnel
5 Conclusions and Acknowledgments race tunnel, and all the support and protection measures
In this article a description of all the waterway system and that were introduced.
utility tunnels has been provided with some highlights of
construction procedures and excavation. An analysis has The authors acknowledge the assistance of the contractor
been given of the pressure shaft, which is considered a key Consorcio Rio Mantaro (Astaldi S.p.A. and Graña y Montero
scheme. Also highlighted were the rockbust theory and SAA.) and the owner of the scheme Cerro del Águila S.A.
events that occurred during the excavation of the headrace (Kallpa S.A.) for their fruitful collaboration.
Minor rockburst • Popping noises 3–6 hours after blasting • Systematic application of
• Dust clouds from crown protection mesh
• Detachments from face before cleaning • Anchors to excavation face
(< 5m3) • Curved excavation face
• Previously set anchor plates deform • Leave excavation material at face
RB3 • V
ery strong, explosion-like noise with several A
dditionally to previous measures:
C2
Heavy rockburst following noises • P oss. apply steel cable lacing
• Popping noises after > 3 hours
Literatur/References
[1] S. M. Sayah et al., 2013. Cerro del Águila 510 MW hydro power project of Cerro del Águila (Peru), World Tunnel
plant: The new Peruvian challenge, Hydropower and Congress 2014, Iguassu Falls, Brasil.
Dams, Innsbruck, Austria. [5] Schleiss, A.J., 1997. Design of reinforced concrete linings
[2] Hutchinson, J.N. and Kojan, E., 1975. The Mayunmarca of pressure tunnels and shafts.
Landslide of 25 April 1974, UNESCO report. [6] Diederichs M.S., Kaiser P.K., Eberhardt E., 2004. Damage
[3] S. M. Sayah et al., 2013. Cerro del Águila Gravity Dam in initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunnel-
Perú: Between Feasibility and Challenges, ICOLD Euro- ling and the influence of near-face stress rotation. Int. J.
pean Club Symposium, Venice, Italy. of R. Mech & Min. Sci., 41, 785–812.
[4] M. Thüring et al., 2014. Overcoming the geological [7] Hoek E. and Brown T.H., 1980. Underground excavations
and design related challenges of the 510 MW hydro- in rock. Inst. of Min. and Metall., London, 527 pp.