RESULTS

Table no.1 Analysis of scores on Non-verbal test of Intelligence.

RIGHT WRONG BLANK

16 3 1
Analogies
Water reflection 19 1 0
Series 18 2 0
Classification 17 3 0
TOTAL 70 9 1

Raw score= Right- wrong/4

= 70-9/4
= 67.75.
IQ =154.

INTERPRETATION:
Participant has scored 16 on subtest 1, Analogy. As per the table 1 she got 3 answers wrong
and while she couldn’t attempt 1 question. One of the reasons might be that was solving
items very precisely and as she solved further questions, difficulty level of questions
increased and thus, didn’t get enough time to complete all items.
Participant has scored 19 on subtest 2, water reflection. As per table 1 she got 1 answer
wrong. When asked in Post Task Questions (PTQs) she had mentioned that some questions
were confusing in subtest 2, thus that might have affected her score. Participant has scored
18 on subtest 3, series. As per table 1 she got 2 answers wrong. Participant has scored 17 on
subtest 4, Classification. As per table 1 she got 3 answers wrong.
It was observed that participant was experiencing fatigue effect while solving the test3 and
was confirmed by participant when asked in PTQs, this might have affected her scores.
Participant obtained score of 154 on non-verbal test of Intelligence, Which indicates that
participant has very superior Intelligence Quotient. There are limitations to this
interpretation as the norms of scale have been conducted on below 16 and 16 years of
males, females and participant was 20 years old. So participant might have solved items
easily without complications as compared to 16 year adolescent.
Administrator observed that participant was calm and comfortable during the test.
Participant also mentioned that she was relaxed and calm when asked in PTQs.
Administrator also observed that participant was focused while solving problems and solved
problems precisely. It was observed that participant was focusing on both speed and
accuracy at a time. When asked in PTQs participant also stated that she was trying to
balance speed and accuracy. Thus, participant could solve all the tests on time and only 1
item of test1 was left blank.
It was also observed by administrator that participant was able to solve 10-13 items easily,
but as the difficulty level increased time taken by participant to solve questions also
increased.
CONCLUSION:
The non-verbal test of Intelligence was administered on participant to assess her
intelligence. It was found that participant has very superior non-verbal intelligence having
score of 154 on the non-verbal test of intelligence scale.