Elections in Hard Times
Building Stronger Democracies
in the 21* Century
THOMAS EDWARD FLORES
AND
IRFAN NOORUDDIN
published in asacacion with Wilson Comer Pes,
Washington, DC2) why Have Elections Failed to Deliver?
An Answer
Chaps 1 decries troubling rend the demecraiing power of
lectins rapidly dteoeated afce the beginning of the sectoral
oom in the Ite 1980s, This letra! shores is no small cause
for concert foe plitalsentists and poymaken. One need look
no further than Eyes troubled recent history foe a istration
Democracy promoters cheered as Egyptians staged mass pots in
Tair Squace in 2011, levding to the ovethiow of longtime dit
tor Hosni Mubarak, Hlstions followed about ffeen months later,
bringing to power » government led by the Muslim Broterbood's
Mohamed Mori. Yet the democratic momentum quickly reversed
‘Mois sted a desertion prohibiting challenges to presidential
decrees. Libera! groups abandoned the covsivent sembly tasked
with wring 2 ew constiation, complaining that i intended
ahve lamic peace into La Stet protests demaning Moras
resignation pesaged a multary coup in 2013, which ousted Mors
from power only one year afer hs eetion. A ew, ess teanspar-
nc eeston in May 2014 installed the architect of that coup, General
‘Abdel Fcc Ss as president, with a suspicious 97 percent ofthe
Our crosmtonal evidence and Fey's troubled pos-Tahrr his
tory force at 0 confront ovo dficat goestons. Fit, why did
‘esions yield salle democratic dividends inthe 1990s and 20008?
Sccond, why have some countries reaped the proposed bene of
decons, wile others have not?
“This chapter offers answers to these questions, beginning with «
trie intelectual history of academe thought on democratization
Poll scientists long relegated lectins tothe backzound of theo
ries of democatc change, ewig them as ancy to either read
structural wansfonmation oalitenegotaions arr the polit fatre
‘This all changed inthe 20005, e scholars eimai eetons as
Why Have Elections Failed to Deliver? An Anscer w@
fash points upon which the political frre crvially depend. Ad
‘ater of democratization by letons found that repented lesions
incubate demacatc governance. Other scholars disagreed, however,
Finding that lection may cause political lene or serve a ages of
authoritarian contol Sl ther scholars split the diference, ontend-
ing tha faure democratic change hinges om the net of etions-
“Thus the ls fiteen years have peed new understandings of how
lectins promote democracy. Yet many questions remain A pers
teat and unfortunate lation ofeleoral and sratural approaches
to understanding poical change is the pine culprit,
We sck to integrate these approaches 0 understand eectoeal st
‘ess and file. The conceptval miles of cr approach ithe
reengniton tht elections ose notin a vacuum, but im diverse tae
turd contexts We concentrate on three forme of legitimacy that
Pula alert whe they win clesons contingens, performance,
{nd democeaticinstntonal Plans enjoy contingent leicmacy
Aer winning eletons, which ceases with the autheticy of that
‘lection. Sich legitimacy is shoreived, however, since sel iterested
‘orers demand esonomnic growth asa price for their conned sop-
por. The depths of performance and democraticinstutona leit=
Inacy condition poicianr path to resecson. Wher performance
legitimacy already exists, incumbents provide public poods aad un
‘on thei ecrde. Similan, when democratic insiaionalleimacy
isdeep,icumbents ae contained from manipulitiag eles tothe
advantage. The absence of performance and demccratcnstewonal
Ieitinncy, however, neces anos cynical path to selection
cients, coruption, and repression. The reused democ-
‘atization, here societies become caught in a low-legiimacy wap of
‘increasingly problematic elections, poor sate performance, and disa
fected vores. This logic leads us to bypothesz tha lectins will be
‘nore likely to spar democratic change when a county has ongee
snd more recent experience with demoeracy, plieal leaders hate
sees to more fica space, and national polit have been more
pect
ctions om the Road to Democracy?
The return of democracy to Southern Europe and Latin America in
the 1970s and 1980s inaugurated an ileal fee pio for8 From Elections to Democracy: Theory and Evidence
the sudy of comparative democratization, which the liberalization
‘of Eastern Europe atthe end ofthe Cold War ony intensified. One
‘consequence of ths netltionship beeen world events ad shol-
fry ingiry has ben the redefinition of elections eon the cnclasion
‘OF demecratc rastons to the impetus forthe tasions, Yet
Jan Teorllcharaceries the study of comparative democeaizaion
4s “inchoate, divered and inoerent."™ Our own view ofthe eld
is moce sanguine, bu we concur that scholars contnae to dsgree
profoundly noconly aver the role of eleesons in democratiation, bat
also oa the more fandamsatl question of he role of lectins vert
poll structures ia political change. We review this hat here. TO
‘accompany our discussion, we sketch the developmen of the Bld in
Tigre 21, hich shows bow diferent lines of ngury have developed
Democratication by (Legitimate) Elections
For thst years beeween the ely 1970s a ery 2000s, pic
scietists seeking wo uncover the causes of democratization regarded
cletions as the culmination, ater than she stimula, of «proces of
‘democratization. Dankware Ruston, for astunce, envisioned thee
‘phase transon from diaorship ro democracy Fist, a prepacatory
phase would hen with srl becreen sompeting societal groupe
perhaps along as lines. Second hese strgues would erate a det
som phase is which polical eles resolve conflicts between bat
fn Sftliners and opt fr democratic change. Theda habituation
phase would wines deepening aceepeance and support forthe new
Aemocetic regime. Only in ths lst phase would regula elections
‘commence. To illustrate the insignificance of elections to Rust, the
‘word *clstion” appears in his acl only thre tne, compaced to
roughly venty times in he intone thi chaps
TRascow's theory of democrate tansions represented a dramatic
eparture from modemization theory, which bad emphasized how
lnojr soionconomie changes would presage democratization, Ke
Deutsch for instance, proposed that rang incomes, the expansion
fof exposure to mass eed, and uchanization would cliate in
‘widening of politcal participation Econom development
special role in such theories, a8 mndeesization ont hyp
lh
EL eepmane
it:
Figur2.1 oor a structural aeons of dena change hae tenet deelap separately30 From Elctions to Democracy: Theory and Evidence
that economic growth, clave equal, andthe creation af a mid-
«de cass would create propitious condions fr democracy.’ Despite
these diferences, however, modernization theory and the incipient
demwerasie transitions Ieature had one important aspect in com
‘moni nether envisioned cletions ax progenitors of democratization
ederization theory did concentate on expanions of what Deis
talled the “pital relevant sata of soy,” but sae democracy
2 the natal outgrowth of imponane structural changes and thooght
Tie of elections a al
Ruswow's understanding of democratic eamsitions soon became
synonymous with the study of comparative democratiation athe
Third Wave of democracy grined momentum, 4 tend which we