Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/228510075

Phytoremediation of acid mine drainage by aquatic floating macrophytes

Article

CITATION READS

1 441

3 authors, including:

Jaime Mello
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
88 PUBLICATIONS   1,307 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Banco de Solos do Estado de Minas Gerais View project

Bioremediation of brazilian soils contaminated with used lubricating oil View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Jaime Mello on 14 August 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


INCT-ACQUA – Annual Report – 2010.
Institute of Science and Technology for Mineral Resource, Water and Biodiversity 1

Phytoremediation of acid mine drainage by aquatic floating


macrophytes

Michelle B. da Cruz, Rosane Aguiar, Jaime W. Vargas de Mello


Grupo de Pesquisa em Drenagem Ácida e Geoquímica do As – Departamento de Solos
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), 36570-000 - Viçosa, MG, Brasil.

Key words: Water contamination, reclamation, arsenic, , phytoremediation.

conditions and tolerance to high concentrations of


Mining activities may generate environmental
impacts in surrounding areas and even far from its toxic elements3,4.

origin. Tails and refuse piles containing sulphidic Phytoremediation studies are still limited to
minerals, such as arsenopyrite (FeAsS), are among some selected plant species and focused on few
the main contamination sources in mining industry. metals, typically one to three metals5,6. So, there is
When exposed to atmospheric water and oxygen a lack of information on simultaneous absorption
sulphidic minerals can be oxidized releasing of several contaminants. Due to the inherent
potentially toxic elements to the environment capacity of Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes
through acid mine drainage (AMD). Elements such and Spirodela polyrhiza species absorb several
as S, Fe, Mn and As are commonly associated to different elements; in a certain extent, they could
AMD, being the last one highly toxic even at low be able to simultaneously accumulate heavy metals
1
concentrations . AMD can affect aquatic systems and toxic metalloids from AMD, with no damage
and impact the biological community structure by to the plant growing. Preliminary results showed
eliminating species in the food chain. In this that Pistia stratiotes and Spirodela polyrhiza are
scenario, phytoremediation is an in situ low cost susceptible to low pH in the aquatic medium, main
option to reclamation of contaminated characteristic of the AMD. On the other hand, E.
2
environments, by using plant species . crassipes was more tolerant to acidic environment
Phytoextraction and phytofiltration are the more (Figure 1).
used phytoremediation and well known techniques.
The effects of AMD on plants includes a decrease
Free floating macrophytes are among the plant
in the chlorophyl a content, mainly to the species
species used to phytoremediation due to their high
P. stratiotes and S. polyrhiza, due to the necrosis
growing rate, high capacity to accumulate heavy
on the leaves (Figure 2).
metals and metalloids, survival under adverse

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

*
Autor correspondente: michellebcruz@gmail.com – Departmento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Av. P.H.
Rolfs, s/n - CEP 36570-000, Viçosa MG, Brasil; Tel.: +055 031 38992052.
INCT-ACQUA – Annual Report – 2010.
Institute of Science and Technology for Mineral Resource, Water and Biodiversity 2
polyrhiza in figure 3 is due to the death of the
plants exposed to AMD.

6000

Concentração As (mg/kg)
1500

1200

900

600

300

0
Folha Pecíolo Raiz

Eichhornia crassipes

Figure 3: As accumulated in different tissues of


E. crassipes plants exposed to acid mine
drainage.
Simultaneous absorption of other heavy metals
by aquatic macrophytes and their interactions are
Figure 1: Phytotoxic effects of acid mine
drainage in aquatic floating macrophytes. still being evaluated. Further studies on the effects
(A-B, E. crassipes; C-D, P. stratiotes; E-F, S. of AMD at anatomical level also are in course.
polyrhiza).

50 We would like to thank CNPq, Fapemig,


E. crassipes
P. stratiotes
CAPES and the INCT - Water, Mineral Resources
Clorofila Total (μg cm-2)

S. polyrhiza
40
and Biodiversity.
30

20
References
10
(1) Duker, A. A., et al., Environmental
0
International, 31, 631 (2005).
Controle DAM
Tratamentos
(2) Pilon-Smits, E. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 56, 15
Figure 2: Total chlorophyl contents in E. (2005).
crassipes, P. stratiotes e S. polyrhiza plants
exposed to acid mine drainage. (3) Mishra, V.K., et al., Bioresource Technology,
The E. crassipes plants accumulated part of 99, 930 (2008).
the soluble arsenic from AMD in different tissues, (4) Mishra, V.K., et al., Water Air Soil Pollut,
but the roots presented higher concentrations 192, 303 (2008).
(Figure 3). Absence of data for P. stratiotes and S. (5) Hassan, S.H., et al., Bioresource Technol., 98,
918 (2007).
INCT-ACQUA – Annual Report – 2010.
Institute of Science and Technology for Mineral Resource, Water and Biodiversity 3
(6) Rahman, M.A., et al., Chemosphere, 69, 3,
493 (2007).

View publication stats

You might also like