Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cosmopolitan Studies-Book
Cosmopolitan Studies-Book
of Cosmopolitanism Studies
Cosmopolitanism is about the extension of the moral and political horizons of people, societies,
organizations and institutions. Over the past 25 years there has been considerable interest in
cosmopolitan thought across the human social sciences.
The second edition of the Routledge International Handbook of Cosmopolitanism Studies is an
enlarged, revised and updated version of the first edition. It consists of 50 chapters across a
broader range of topics in the social and human sciences. Eighteen entirely new chapters cover
topics that have become increasingly prominent in cosmopolitan scholarship in recent years,
such as sexualities, public space, the Kantian legacy, the commons, internet, generations, care
and heritage.
This Second Edition aims to showcase some of the most innovative and promising
developments in recent writing in the human and social sciences on cosmopolitanism. Both
comprehensive and innovative in the topics covered, the Routledge International Handbook of
Cosmopolitanism Studies is divided into four sections.
• Cosmopolitan theory and history with a focus on the classical and contemporary approaches,
• The cultural dimensions of cosmopolitanism,
• The politics of cosmopolitanism,
• World varieties of cosmopolitanism.
Gerard Delanty is Professor of Sociology and Social & Political Thought, University of
Sussex, Brighton, UK. His books include The Cosmopolitan Imagination (Cambridge University
Press 2009), Formations of European Modernity: A Historical and Political Sociology of Europe, 2nd
edition (Palgrave 2018), The European Heritage: A Critical Re-interpretation (Routledge 2018) and
Community, 3rd edition (Routledge 2018).
Routledge International
Handbook of
Cosmopolitanism Studies
Second Edition
Typeset in Bembo
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
This volume is dedicated to the memory of Ulrick Beck (1944–2015)
and Chris Rumford (1958–2016).
Contents
PART I
Cosmopolitan theory, history and approaches 9
vii
Contents
PART II
Cosmopolitan cultures 141
viii
Contents
PART III
Cosmopolitics 313
28 Cosmocitizens? 326
Richard Vernon
ix
Contents
PART IV
World varieties of cosmopolitanism 441
x
Contents
50 Jews and cosmopolitanism from the early modern age to the global era 586
Michael L. Miller and Scott Ury
Index 601
xi
Tables
xii
Notes on contributors
Esperança Bielsa is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Her
research is in the areas of cultural sociology, social theory and the sociology of translation. She is
the author of Cosmopolitanism and Translation. Investigations into the Experience of the Foreign (Rout-
ledge 2016) and The Latin American Urban Crónica. Between Literature and Mass Culture (Lexington
Books 2006); co-author, with Susan Bassnett, of Translation in Global News (Routledge 2009) and
co-editor, with Christopher Hughes, of Globalization, Political Violence and Translation (Palgrave
Macmillan 2009).
Gillian Brock is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Some
of her publications relevant to cosmopolitanism include Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account
(Oxford University Press 2009), also translated into Chinese (2014); Debating Brain Drain: May
Governments Restrict Emigration? (Oxford University Press 2015, with Michael Blake); Cosmopoli-
tanism versus Non-Cosmopolitanism (Oxford University Press 2013, edited); The Political Philoso-
phy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge University Press 2005, edited with Harry Brighouse); Global
Health and Global Health Ethics (Cambridge University Press 2011, edited with Solomon Benatar)
and Current Debates in Global Justice (Springer 2005, edited with Darrel Moellendorf).
Garrett W. Brown is Professor in Political Theory and Global Health Policy in the School of Pol-
itics and International Studies (POLIS) at the University of Leeds. His research includes work on
cosmopolitanism, globalization theory, global justice, international law and global health policy.
His recent cosmopolitan publications include Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of
a Cosmopolitan Constitution (Edinburgh University Press 2009); The Cosmopolitanism Reader (Polity
2010) and The State and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities (Oxford University Press 2018).
Kevin Brown is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at Deakin University. He has researched and
published in the areas of community association, the third sector and social capital. He has given
keynote addresses to conferences and research groups in Australia, Malaysia, Spain, Sweden, the
Netherlands, Russia and the UK. He has held visiting fellows at the Universities of California-
Berkeley, Hull, La Trobe, Stockholm and the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow).
xiii
Notes on contributors
Tamara Caraus is Researcher at the Research Institute of the University of Bucharest. Her area of
research includes cosmopolitanism and continental political theory. She contributed with articles
to various academic journals and volumes, published four books and edited Cosmopolitanism and
the Legacy of Dissent (with C. Parvu, Routledge 2014); Cosmopolitanism without Foundations (with
D. Lazea, Zeta Books 2014); Re-Grounding Cosmopolitanism. Towards a Post-Foundational Cosmo-
politanism (with E. Paris, Routledge 2015); Cosmopolitanism and Global Protests: Special Issue of
Globalizations Journal (with C. Parvu, 2017) and Migration, Protest Movements and the Politics of
Resistance: A Radical Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Routledge 2018, forthcoming).
Rachel Cason, a UK citizen, was raised by missionary parents in Niger, West Africa. Her aca-
demic career has been spent seeking and recording life stories, exploring the intersections of mar-
ginality and belonging, and Third Culture Kid identity. Rachel’s doctorate was awarded in 2015
by Keele University, England, and was titled, Third Culture Kids: Migration Narratives on Belonging,
Identity and Place. That same year, she founded Life Story (www.explorelifestory.com) to offer life
story work as a therapeutic tool to adult Third Culture Kids. Rachel’s personal career has been
spent practising the elusive art of settling, and constructing home in a global landscape.
Pheng Cheah is Professor of Rhetoric and Chair of the Center of Southeast Asia Studies at
the University of California at Berkeley, where he has taught since 1999. He has published
widely on the theory and practice of cosmopolitanism. He is the author of Spectral Nationality:
Passages of Freedom from Kant to Postcolonial Literatures of Liberation (Columbia University Press
2003); Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights (Harvard University Press
2006) and most recently, What is a World? On Postcolonial Literature as World Literature (Duke
University Press 2016). His co-edited books include Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond
the Nation (University of Minnesota Press 1998); Grounds of Comparison: Around the Work of
Benedict Anderson (Routledge 2003) and Derrida and the Time of the Political (Duke University
Press 2009).
Daniel Chernilo is Professor at the Institute for the Humanities at Universidad Diego Portales in
Chile and a Visiting Professor of Social and Political Thought at Loughborough University in the
UK. He has written widely on nationalism, cosmopolitanism and the history of social and politi-
cal thought. His latest book is Debating Humanity. Towards a Philosophical Sociology (Cambridge
University Press 2017).
Anthony Cooper is currently a Visiting Research Fellow at Queens University Belfast focusing
on the ‘visible spatiality’ of the Irish border in the context of contemporary Europeanization
(and, at the time of writing, Brexit). His principle research interest focuses on how to empiri-
cally capture the multiplicity and multidimensionality of borders that accounts for the diver-
sity of actors, practices, objects and representations that all contribute to (and are influenced
by) the (re)production of borders. This focus is further framed by examining the relationship
between contemporary bordering and social/cultural/political processes attributed to globaliza-
tion. Anthony has published widely on the broad subject of borders and he is currently working
on a substantial book project looking at the intersection between general border studies and
traditional/contemporary philosophy.
Mihaela Czobor-Lupp is Associate Professor at Carleton College (USA). Her research focuses
on the ambiguous role that imagination can play in politics. Her most recent book is Imagination
in Politics: Freedom or Domination? (Lexington Books, Lanham 2014) and her most recent article
xiv
Notes on contributors
is ‘Herder on the Emancipatory Power of Religion and Religious Education’, (Review of Politics,
Spring 79(2), 2017).
Gerard Delanty is Professor of Sociology and Social & Political Thought, Sussex University,
Brighton, UK. He is the author of various books, which include Inventing Europe (Macmillan
1995); Formations of European Modernity: A Historical and Political Sociology of Europe (Palgrave
2013); The Cosmopolitan Imagination: The Renewal of Critical Social Theory (Cambridge University
Press 2009) and The European Heritage: A Critical Re-Interpretation (Routledge 2018).
Ander Errasti has a PhD in Ethics and Political Philosophy from the Pompeu Fabra University,
Barcelona. His research is focused on the impact of globalization on nations and nationalism. He
has been a visiting doctoral student at the Department of Politics and International Relations at
Oxford University and visiting researcher at the University of Edinburgh. He is a researcher in
Globernance: Institute for Democratic Governance.
Robert Fine is Emeritus Professor of Sociology at the University of Warwick, where he was
founding director of the Social Theory Centre and convenor of the MA in Social and Political
Thought. He is author of Cosmopolitanism (Routledge 2007) and a number of articles and chap-
ters on cosmopolitanism.
Seckin Baris Gulmez is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Izmir Katip Çelebi Uni-
versity, Turkey. He previously worked as a postdoctoral researcher for the EU-funded project
FEUTURE at Koc University and as a teaching fellow at University of Warwick. He received his
PhD in politics from Royal Holloway University of London and his MSc and BSc degrees in IR
from Middle East Technical University.
Oliver Hall is a doctoral candidate in the School of Law, Politics and Sociology at the University
of Sussex. From a critical cosmopolitan framework, his doctoral thesis focuses on examining the
affective content of virtual solidarity networks and how such networks, by organizing around
subpolitical issues of global justice, can inform a cosmopolitan conception of a global ethics as
emerging out of the sociocognitive processes of intercultural discourse.
Austin Harrington is Reader in Sociology at the University of Leeds, UK. He is the author most
recently of German Cosmopolitan Social Thought and the Idea of the West: Voices from Weimar (Cam-
bridge University Press 2016).
Neil Harris is completing a PhD at Sussex University, Brighton, UK. His thesis concerns social
pathology analysis and critical theory. He is the author of ‘Recovering the Critical Potential of
Social Pathology Diagnosis’, European Journal of Social Theory. vol 22, no 1, 2019.
Andrew Hartman is Professor of History at Illinois State University. He is the author of Education
and the Cold War: The Battle for the American School (Palgrave Macmillan 2008) and A War for the
Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars (University of Chicago Press 2015).
xv
Notes on contributors
Alexander Hensby is Research Associate at the School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social
Research at the University of Kent, UK. His research and teaching interests include political
socialization, social networks, globalization and higher education. He is the author of Participation
and Non-Participation in Student Activism (Palgrave, 2017) and Theorizing Global Studies (Palgrave,
2011, with Darren O’Byrne).
David Inglis is Professor of Sociology at the University of Helsinki. He was previously professor
of Sociology at the University of Exeter and the University of Aberdeen. He writes in the areas
of cultural sociology, the sociology of globalization, historical sociology, the sociology of food
and drink, and social theory, both modern and classical. He has written and edited various books
in these areas, most recently The Sage Handbook of Cultural Sociology. He is founding editor of the
Sage/BSA journal Cultural Sociology. His current research concerns the sociological analysis of
the global wine industry.
Humeira Iqtidar is Senior Lecturer in Politics at King’s College London. She is the author
of Secularizing Islamists? Jamaat-e-Islami and Jamaat-ud-Dawa in Urban Pakistan (University of
Chicago Press 2011). Her research engages with Islamic thought and practice, postcolonial
theory and comparative political theory. Her current research focuses on non-liberal forms of
tolerance.
Keith Jacobs is Professor of Sociology in the School of Social Sciences at the University of Tas-
mania. His recent books are Experience and Representation: Contemporary Perspectives on Migration
in Australia (Routledge 2011); Ocean to Outback: Cosmopolitanism in Contemporary Australia (Uni-
versity of Western Australia Publishing 2011), co-edited with Jeff Malpas and House Home and
Society (Palgrave 2016) authored with Rowland Atkinson.
Weiqiang Lin is Assistant Professor at the Department of Geography, NUS. His work straddles
between social-cultural approaches and geopolitical ones around air transport, logistics and infra-
structures. Weiqiang was a recipient of the UK Commonwealth Scholarship from 2011 to 2014,
and was an NUS Overseas Postdoctoral Fellow (University of Toronto) in 2015.
xvi
Notes on contributors
Eduardo Mendieta is Professor of Philosophy, associate director of the Rock Ethics Institute,
affiliated faculty at the School of International Affairs, and the Bioethics Program at Penn State
University. He is the author of The Adventures of Transcendental Philosophy (Rowman & Littlefield
2002) and Global Fragments: Globalizations, Latinamericanisms, and Critical Theory (SUNY Press
2007). He is also co-editor with Jonathan VanAntwerpen of The Power of Religion in the Public
Sphere (Columbia University Press 2011), and with Craig Calhoun and Jonathan VanAntwerpen
of Habermas and Religion (Polity 2013) and with Stuart Elden of Reading Kant’s Geography (SUNY
Press 2011). He recently finished a book titled The Philosophical Animal, which will be published
by SUNY Press in 2018. He is 2017 the recipient of the Frantz Fanon Outstanding Achieve-
ments Award.
Michael L. Miller is Associate Professor in the Nationalism Studies program at Central European
University in Budapest. His publications include Rabbis and Revolution: The Jews of Moravia in the
Age of Emancipation (Stanford University Press 2015).
Aurea Mota holds a PhD in Sociology from The Institute of Political and Social Studies (IESP/
UERJ) in Rio de Janeiro. She is especially interested in Latin American social thought, history
of colonial and modern America, human displacements, social theory and historical sociology.
She is currently based at the University of Barcelona. She is a member of the Latin American
Council of Social Science’s Political Philosophy Working Group. Recent papers have appeared in
the Journal of Classical Sociology, Social Imaginaries, European Journal of Social Theory and in Kriterion.
Spaces of Experience: Displacement and Knowledge in Modernity (Routledge, forthcoming) is her first
book in English.
Darren J. O’Byrne is Reader in Sociology and Human Rights, and Director of the Crucible
Centre for Human Rights Research, at the University of Roehampton, UK. He has written
extensively on globalization, social theory and human rights. His recent books include Human
Rights in a Globalizing World (Palgrave 2016), Theorizing Global Studies (Palgrave 2011, with Alex-
ander Hensby) and Introducing Sociological Theory (Routledge 2010), while his recent articles apply
the perspective of critical globalization studies to a variety of contemporary concerns from the
commodification of higher education to ecocide.
xvii
Notes on contributors
with Jyotirmaya Tripathy and Politics in the Global Age: Critical Reflections on Sovereignty, Citizen-
ship, Territory and Nationalism by Routledge in 2015 with Sonika Gupta.
Nikos Papastergiadis is Professor at the School of Culture and Communication at the Univer-
sity of Melbourne. His publications include Modernity as Exile (1993); Dialogues in the Diaspora
(1998); The Turbulence of Migration (2000); Metaphor and Tension (2004); Spatial Aesthetics: Art Place
and the Everyday (2006); Cosmopolitanism and Culture (2012); Ambient Perspectives (2013).
Ken Plummer is Emeritus Professor of Sociology at the University of Essex. He was the founder
editor of the journal Sexualities. He has published over 150 articles and some 15 books, most
recently: Sociology: The Basics, (2016) 2nd ed. and Cosmopolitan Sexualities: Hope and the Humanist
Imagination (2015). Forthcoming works include: Narrative Power (due 2018) and Flourishing Lives
(due 2019).
Sandra Ponzanesi is Professor in Gender and Postcolonial Studies at the Department of Media
and Culture Studies, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. She has published widely in the field
of postcolonial theory, Europe, cinema and digital migration. Among her publications are: The
Postcolonial Cultural Industry (Palgrave 2014); Gender, Globalisation and Violence (Routledge 2014)
and Paradoxes of Postcolonial Culture (Suny 2004). She has co-edited several volumes, among which
Postcolonial Intellectuals in Europe (Rowman and Littlefield International forthcoming); Postcolo-
nial Transitions in Europe (Rowman and Littlefield International 2016); Postcolonial Cinema Studies
(Routledge 2012) and Migrant Cartographies (2005).
Alexa Robertson is Professor of Media and Communication at the Department of Media Stud-
ies (IMS), Stockholm University and Director of the Screening Protest project, funded by the
Swedish Research Council (screeningprotest.com). Her research foci are global news, cosmopoli-
tanism and the media, comparative television analysis and narrative. Her books include Media and
Politics in a Globalized World (Polity 2015); Global News: Reporting Conflicts and Cosmopolitanism
(Peter Lang 2015); Mediated Cosmopolitanism: The World of Television News (Polity 2010) and Screen-
ing Protest.Visual Narratives of Dissent across Time, Space and Genre (Routledge forthcoming 2018).
Maurice Roche is Emeritus Professor of Sociology at Sheffield University. His main interests are
in the sociology of popular culture particularly ‘mega-events’, and the sociology of European
society. Among other books he is the author of Exploring the Sociology of Europe (2010 Sage) and
Mega-Events and Social Change (2017 Manchester University Press).
Lisa Rofel is Professor of Anthropology at University of California, Santa Cruz. She is the
author of Other Modernities: Gendered Yearnings in China after Socialism (University of California
Press); Desiring China: Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality and Public Culture (Duke Uni-
versity Press); co-editor (with Chris Berry and Lü Xinyu) of The New Chinese Documentary
xviii
Notes on contributors
Film Movement: For the Public Record (Hong Kong University Press) and co-editor (with Petrus
Liu) of ‘Beyond the Strai(gh)ts: Transnationalism and Chinese Queer Politics’ (special issue of
positions).
Victor Roudometof has held positions at Princeton University, Washington University, Lee Uni-
versity and Miami University as well as the University of Cyprus. His main research interests
include globalization, glocalization, culture and religion. His latest book is Glocalization: A Critical
Introduction (Routledge 2016).
Chris Rumford (1958–2016) was Professor of Political Sociology and Global Politics in the
department of Politics and International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London. He is
the author of several books including The European Union: A Political Sociology (Blackwell 2002);
Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization (with Gerard Delanty)
(Routledge 2005); Cosmopolitan Spaces: Europe, Globalization, Theory (Routledge 2008); winner of
the Association of Borderland Studies Gold Award 2010 (Cambridge Scholars 2010); The Sage
Handbook of European Studies (Sage 2009); Citizens and Borderwork in Contemporary Europe (Rout-
ledge 2009) and Cosmopolitanism and Europe (Liverpool University Press 2007).
Tracey Skillington is Lecturer in Sociology in the School of Sociology and Philosophy, University
College Cork, Ireland. Recent publications include Climate Justice & Human Rights (Palgrave
2016) and special issue of the European Journal of Social Theory, ‘Perspectives on Climate Change’
(2015) 18(3). She is currently completing a monograph entitled Climate Change and Intergenera-
tional Justice for Routledge (2018).
Zlatko Skrbiš is Professor of Sociology and the Senior Pro Vice-Chancellor (Academic) at
Monash University, Australia. He is a sociologist working in the fields of cosmopolitanism, social
theory, life-course studies and migration. His earlier research focused on issues of nationalism,
migration and transnationalism. Representative works include Long-Distance Nationalism: Dias-
poras, Homelands and Identities and Constructing Singapore: Elitism, Ethnicity and the Nation Building
Project (Sage, with Barr). Skrbiš has also worked extensively on social theory related to the con-
cept of cosmopolitanism. This has resulted in publications including the book Cosmopolitanism:
Uses of the Idea (Sage, with Ian Woodward).
xix
Notes on contributors
Piet Strydom retired from the Department of Sociology, School of Sociology and Philosophy,
University College Cork, Ireland, in 2011. His most recent publication is Contemporary Critical
Theory and Methodology (Routledge 2011).
Yoshio Sugimoto is Emeritus Professor at La Trobe University, Australia. A graduate from Kyoto
University with a PhD from the University of Pittsburgh, he was Dean of Social Sciences at La
Trobe from 1988 to 1991. Since 1988, he has been a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the
Humanities and published many books and articles both in English and Japanese. His recent
publications include An Introduction to Japanese Society, fourth edition (Cambridge University
Press 2014), The Cambridge Companion to Modern Japanese Culture (Cambridge University Press,
edited, 2009) and Rethinking Japanese Studies: Eurocentrism and the Asia-Pacific Region (Routledge,
co-edited with Kaori Okano, 2018). He is currently Executive Director of Trans Pacific Press,
Melbourne.
Bryan S. Turner is Professor of Sociology in the Institute for Religion Politics and Society at the
Australian Catholic University (Melbourne); Honorary Professor of Sociology at Potsdam Uni-
versity Germany and Emeritus Professor of Sociology at the Graduate Center City University of
New York. He won the Max Planck Award in 2015 and is the editor of the Wiley Encyclopedia
of Social Theory (2017).
Scott Ury is Senior Lecturer in Tel Aviv University’s Department of Jewish History where he
is also Director of the Roth Institute for the Study of Antisemitism and Racism. Published by
Stanford University Press, his monograph Barricades and Banners: The Revolution of 1905 and the
Transformation of Warsaw Jewry was awarded the 2013 Reginald Zelnik Prize for outstanding book
in the field of history by the ASEEES. He is also co-editor of Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and the
Jews of East Central Europe and of Jews and Their Neighbors in Eastern Europe since 1750.
Huon Wardle is the Director of the Centre for Cosmopolitan Studies at the University of St
Andrews. He is the author of An Ethnography of Cosmopolitanism in Kingston, Jamaica (2000) and,
with Paloma Gay y Blasco of How to Read Ethnography (2007). He is the editor with Nigel Rap-
port of A Cosmopolitan Anthropology?, with Moises Lino e Silva of Freedom in Practice (2017) and
with Justin Shaffner of Cosmopolitics (2017). He was awarded the Royal Anthropological Insti-
tute’s J.B. Donne Essay Prize in 2014.
Pnina Werbner is Professor Emerita of Social Anthropology, Keele University. She is author of
The Making of an African Working Class: Politics, Law and Cultural Protest in the Manual Workers’
Union of Botswana (Pluto Press 2014) and of ‘The Manchester Migration Trilogy’ – The Migration
Process (1990/2002), Imagined Diasporas (2002) and Pilgrims of Love (2003). She has edited several
theoretical collections on hybridity, cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism, migration and citizen-
ship, including Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism (Berg 2008) and The Political Aesthetics
of Global Protest: Beyond the Arab Spring (Edinburgh 2014). She currently holds a Leverhulme
Emeritus fellowship on ‘The Changing Kgotla: The Transformation of Customary Courts in
Village Botswana’.
xx
Notes on contributors
Iain Wilkinson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Kent, UK. His research addresses
problems of social suffering, modern humanitarianism and issues related to the cultural politics
of compassion. His publications include Anxiety in a Risk Society (2001 Routledge); Suffering: A
Sociological Introduction (2005 Polity); Risk, Vulnerability and Everyday Life (2010 Routledge) and
(co-authored with Arthur Kleinman) A Passion for Society: How We Think About Human Suffering
(2016 University of California Press).
Ian Woodward is Professor at the Department of Marketing and Management of the Uni-
versity of Southern Denmark. He researches in the sociology of consumption and material
culture, and in the cultural dimensions of cosmopolitanism. He is co-author of The Sociology
of Cosmopolitanism (Palgrave 2009, with Kendall and Skrbiš) and with Zlatko Skrbiš he pub-
lished Cosmopolitanism, Uses of the Idea (Sage/TCS, 2013). Most recently he published Vinyl,
The Analogue Record in the Digital Age (Bloomsbury 2015, with Bartmanski) and co-edited The
Festivalization of Culture (Ashgate 2014).
Brenda S.A. Yeoh is Professor (Provost’s Chair) in the Department of Geography as well as
Research Leader of the Asian Migration Cluster at the Asia Research Institute, NUS. Her research
interests include the politics of space in colonial and postcolonial cities, and she has considerable
experience working on a wide range of migration research in Asia, including key themes such as
cosmopolitanism and highly skilled talent migration; gender, social reproduction and care migra-
tion; migration, national identity and citizenship issues; globalizing universities and international
student mobilities; and cultural politics, family dynamics and international marriage migrants.
xxi
Preface to the second edition
The second edition is an enlarged, revised and updated version of the first edition, which was
published in 2012 and comprised of 45 chapters. The new edition consists of 50 chapters across
a broader range of topics in the social and human sciences. There are 18 entirely new chapters
that cover topics that have become increasingly prominent in cosmopolitan scholarship in recent
years, such as sexualities, public space, the Kantian legacy, the commons, internet, generations,
care, heritage.
The chapter on borders by the late Chris Rumford has been updated by Anthony Cooper.
The volume retains the four-fold structure of the first editions, cosmopolitan theory and his-
tory with a focus on the classic approaches, the cultural dimensions of cosmopolitanism, ‘cosmo-
politics’, and world varieties of cosmopolitanism.
Gerard Delanty
January 2018
xxii
Introduction
The field of cosmopolitanism studies
Gerard Delanty
Over the past two decades there has been very wide interest in cosmopolitanism across the
human and social sciences. Where earlier it had been largely a term associated with moral and
political philosophy, cosmopolitanism has now become a widely used term in the social sciences
and possibly rivals globalization and transnationalism as a focus for research. In many ways cos-
mopolitanism constitutes an interdisciplinary area for the human and social sciences. As invoked
in this volume, the idea of cosmopolitanism studies – or cosmopolitan studies – does not proclaim
anything more than the recognition of interdisciplinarity arising from common research ques-
tions and theoretical lineages. Cosmopolitanism has been taken up by most disciplinary tradi-
tions, though its usage various often quite considerably. Cosmopolitanism in anthropology, for
instance, is quite different from cosmopolitanism in sociology and in political philosophy. While
the diverse literature often appeals to some classic texts, there is nonetheless considerable variety
of interpretations and applications. In general, these vary from highly normative approaches as
in political philosophy to more empirical applications in sociology and anthropology. There is
much to be gained by greater dialogue between the various disciplines that have taken up the idea
of cosmopolitanism. It is in this somewhat limited sense of interdisciplinarity that the notion of
cosmopolitanism studies can be uncontroversially used. This volume is a contribution to inter-
disciplinary cosmopolitanism. As several chapters demonstrate, philosophical debate about the
normative characteristics of cosmopolitanism needs to engage with the anthropological and soci-
ological literature on actual cosmopolitanism. However, disciplinarity presupposes disciplinarity.
There is perhaps a second and stronger sense of idea of cosmopolitanism studies, namely an
emerging post-disciplinary studies area more or less beyond disciplinary traditions. Whether or
not cosmopolitanism studies today constitutes such a domain of inquiry that goes beyond the
assumptions of interdisciplinarity cannot be so easily concluded. For adherents to disciplinarity
and interdisciplinarity, there will be some resistance to such moves, which will be judged to lead
to a loss of theoretical and methodological rigour.
Yet, in whatever sense the term cosmopolitan studies is used, there is justification for it in that
cosmopolitanism, despite the absence of theoretical and methodological agreement, is certainly
an object of research and reflection across a very wide range of disciplines. For the time being
it will probably remain an interdisciplinary field and thus a contrast to, for instance, the related
domain of global studies where the post-disciplinary moment is more pronounced.
1
Gerard Delanty
Cosmopolitanism, it could be argued, is but an aspect of global studies and thus does not jus-
tify being designated a distinct domain of inquiry. However, such a charge is not warranted for
cosmopolitanism has a different focus and background. Global studies, as the study of globaliza-
tion, is a relatively recent development while cosmopolitanism has a long history as a concept
and a literature that goes back to ancient Greek thought. While it lacks the scope of global stud-
ies, its historical and philosophical background, diverse as it is, arguably provides greater focus.
One of the defining aspects of cosmopolitanism is its normative orientation and it is this that
distinguishes it from globalization, which is not a normative concept. It is difficult to use the
term cosmopolitanism without a normative stance. It is precisely this normative orientation that
will meet with opposition from those who would rather separate social and historical analysis
from philosophically grounded concepts. But the attraction that cosmopolitanism has today is
not unconnected with the implicit tension between cosmopolitanism and globalization, with
cosmopolitanism suggesting a critique of globalization. The world may becoming more and
more linked by powerful global forces, but this does not make the world more cosmopolitan. If
the normative underpinnings of cosmopolitanism are taken seriously, it must be apparent that it
is not reducible to the condition of globalization.
In the broadest sense possible, cosmopolitanism is about the extension of the moral and politi-
cal horizons of people, societies, organizations and institutions. It implies an attitude of openness
as opposed to closure. For Eduardo Mendieta, in his chapter in this volume, it is now a challenge
to the anthropocentric and zoomorphic assumptions that ground human exceptionalism. The
political philosophy of cosmopolitanism has always up-held the spirit of openness and a perspec-
tive on the world that emphasized the extension of the bonds of inclusivity. Cosmopolitanism is
therefore a condition that is more likely than not to be exemplified in opposition to prevailing
conditions and thus signalling in some sense the exploration of alternatives to the status quo. This
tension between the status quo and the imaginary of an alternative has often been taken to mean
that cosmopolitanism is a purely ideal aspiration not rooted in reality. The opposite is the case, for
such projections are themselves real and products of concrete experiences. The growth of cosmo-
politanism today is undoubtedly due to considerable disquiet about the impact of globalization,
on the one side, and, on the other, the recognition that a globally connected world must find
solutions that take into account the perspectives of others beyond one’s own immediate context.
Aspirations to improve social justice and find solutions for global environmental challenges are
not simply unrealistic ideals unlinked to political practice, but in many ways have become a part
of the social imaginaries of almost all societies in the present day. For this reason, then, as Chris
Rumford and Anthony Cooper have argued in their chapter, cosmopolitan opportunities do not
appear ready formed as the antidote to the ‘iron cage’ of nationalism, but should be seen as poten-
tials within the present. In similar terms, Ian Woodward and Zlatko Skrbiš argue that cosmopoli-
tanism is never an absolute or fixed category that resides simply within some individuals more
than others, but a dimension of social life that must be actively constructed through practices
of meaning-making in social situations. But normative visions of alternative ways of organizing
societies persist and these are discussed in the chapters by Gillian Brock and Richard Vernon who
look at some of the debates within political philosophy on global justice.
It is often argued that cosmopolitanism reflects a disdain for the local and is an elite preoc-
cupation. In this view, cosmopolitanism is simply a global ideology or an embracing of the
world of the mobile global elite. The nature of cosmopolitan thought in recent years contra-
dicts this criticism. As reflected in many chapters in this volume, we find a strong emphasis on
cosmopolitanism as rooted as opposed to being a rejection of real communities. The notion
of a rooted cosmopolitanism has been variously defended by theorists as different as the moral
philosopher Kwame Anthony Appiah and the sociologist Ulrich Beck and was also advocated
2
Introduction
by Hannah Arendt. The reception of cosmopolitanism in the social sciences as well as in post-
colonial thought, whereby cosmopolitanism becomes linked with empirical social phenomena,
makes it difficult to claim that cosmopolitanism is only an elite phenomenon. It is increasingly
associated with the claims to rights of groups previously excluded from political community and
is very much bound up with dissent and protest. Thus, for instance, in the chapters by Hensby
and O’Byrne, Plummer, and Caraus and Parvu, it is associated with marginal groups and in the
chapter by Walter D. Mignolo cosmopolitanism is produced by de-colonialism in the global
south. It is also worth recalling that in its classical origins in Ancient Greece the cosmopolitan
current represented by the Cynics gave expression to anti-elite and anti-institutional notions
of belonging and citizenship, a contrast to the Stoic tradition that fit more easily into the new
Hellenistic empire of Alexander and the nascent Roman empire. The tension between popular
and elite conceptions of cosmopolitanism has persisted in the subsequent history of the idea and
can also be found in the discord between moral individualist positions and aspirations for new
cosmopolitan world institutions. But cosmopolitanism is always a defence of the autonomy of
the individual. Thus education, as Matthew J. Hayden argues, provides one of the best arenas
for examining the articulation of actually existing cosmopolitanisms with cosmopolitanism as a
normative moral and/or political ideal. Schools are, after all, places where educators struggle daily
to impart, inscribe and actualize various visions of the moral individual and the good society.
Schools are a natural site for the exploration of tensions where students from different cultures
meet and expose the need for new ways of living together.
The popularity of cosmopolitan today, it might be suggested, lies in its relevance to an under-
standing of major social change throughout the world (see the contributions in Part I by Gerard
Delanty and Neal Harris, David Inglis, Bo Stråth and Piet Strydom and, in Part IV, by Maurice
Roche on Europe). It is particularly relevant to an understanding of shifts in the social imaginaries
of societies and the emergence of ethical and political responses to global challenges. Related con-
cepts, such as internationalism, globalization and transnationalism do not quite offer a framework
of interpretation and not all aspects of major social change can be understood with reference to
these concepts (see Victor Roudometof ’s chapter). Cosmopolitanism concerns ways of imagining
the world and thus it is more than a condition of mobility or transnational movement. It is partic-
ularly bound up with the expansion of democracy and the extension of the space of the political.
The revival of cosmopolitan thought today has much to do with the tremendous changes that
occurred in the 1990s in the aftermath of the end of communism in USSR and central and eastern
Europe. In this period, which also saw the end of Apartheid, the Tiananmen Square movement, and,
extending into the present day, the movements towards democratization of the Arab world, cosmo-
politanism in all these arenas has wide appeal as framework of interpretation. The two hundredth
anniversary of Kant’s 1795 work Perpetual Peace in 1995 was an important movement in revival of
cosmopolitanism since this work was the defining text in modern cosmopolitan thought with its
central notion of a principle of hospitality as the basis of a cosmopolitan political community. See
Garrett W. Brown’s chapter on the Kantian legacy of cosmopolitanism and the more recent contro-
versies that have arisen around it. The 1990s were marked not only by such major political events
of global significance, but in addition by the arrival of the internet and an epochal revolution in
communication technologies which led not only to the transformation of everyday life and politics
but too of capitalism. The sense of epochal change was enhanced with a sense of a new millennium.
As with previous periods of major social and political transformation, the new millennium
began with cosmopolitan and anti-cosmopolitan movements colliding. From 11th September
2001 with the emergence of the ‘war on terror’ to the global crisis of capitalism that began on
14th September 2008, with the collapse of the Lehman Brothers, anti-cosmopolitan tendencies
emerged to re-shape the world according to new doctrines of security and capitalist crisis. The
3
Gerard Delanty
rise of right-wing xenophobic nationalism in central and Eastern Europe, the Trump presidency
and Brexit, the trend towards authoritarian democracy in many parts of the world are further
reminders that global change does not lead only to cosmopolitan outcomes. However, one should
not see cosmopolitanism in terms of a zero sum game of a choice between atavistic nationalism
and religious fundamentalism, one the one side, and on the other cosmopolitan ideals. Both are
part of the contemporary world. Cosmopolitanism is expressed in degrees as opposed to being a
condition that is either present or absent; elements of cosmopolitanism can be variously found in
all societies. It may be suggested that every political community contains both cosmopolitan and
anti-cosmopolitan orientations; or, in other words orientations towards openness and closure are
part of the make-up of all collective entities. Viewed in such light, the political cultures of societ-
ies, both in the past and in the present, are never entirely cosmopolitan in much the same way that
they are never entirely democratic. For the same reasons it is a mistake to see cosmopolitanism
in terms of a model of decline. It is arguably the case that despite widespread anti-cosmopolitan
trends, there has been a world-wide increase in cosmopolitanism and the carriers of it may be
oppositional movements or movements in the direction of global democratizations, as discussed
in the chapters by Richard Vernon and James D. Ingram, as well as the chapter by Alexander
Hensby and Darren J. O’Byrne and the chapter by Tamara Caraus and Camil Alexandru Parvu.
This has also been very well documented by Austin Harrington in the case of Weimar Ger-
many where cosmopolitan thought remained strong, in contrast to the conventional image of its
decline in the first half of the twentieth century.
Cosmopolitanism is thus best seen in light of a larger framework of analysis than something that
can be accounted for only in terms of attitudes. While the term cosmopolitanism goes back to the
Stoics, and earlier, it is best understood as part of the social imaginary of the modern world. In this
volume, Piet Strydom situates cosmopolitanism in the context of an account of the learning poten-
tials within modernity. This cognitive approach is reflected in the general association of cosmo-
politanism with post-Kantian conceptions of political community and modernity. This tie between
modernity and cosmopolitanism all immediately raises a different question, namely the relation
between cosmopolitanism and different models of modernity, since modernity is not only Western,
as in the Kantian tradition of European political modernity or its various liberal alternatives.
A problem for cosmopolitan studies is the term itself and its Western genealogy. Most con-
ceptions of cosmopolitanism emanating from the Kantian idea, which in turn derives from the
original Stoic philosophy, presuppose a largely Western approach to history and modernity.
Is cosmopolitanism therefore uncosmopolitan in being a product of the West? Unfortunately
there has been insufficient attention given to this in the existing literature, which on the whole
tends to ignore the historical experience of non-Western parts of the world. In this volume the
problem of translating cosmopolitanism is specifically addressed in the contributions by Walter
D. Mignolo and Bo Stråth, as well as in the chapters that constitute Part IV, on world varieties
of cosmopolitanism, such as Yoshio Sugimoto’s chapter on Japan where he makes the argument
that the concept of ‘Kyōsei’ translates the Western notion of cosmopolitanism or Lisa Rofel’s
discussion of the Chinese notion of ‘tianxia’. In view of the diverse interpretations of cosmo-
politanism, a starting point is to recognize that cosmopolitanism is an open-ended approach
and not based on a fixed standard of values. It is also plausible to suggest the term is no longer
confined to its Western genealogy, but should be related to the experiences that roughly cor-
respond to it in the histories of other world cultures. This is where cultural translation becomes
a consideration for a genuinely cosmopolitan approach, which must embrace global history and
where the most promising and innovative developments can be made in cosmopolitan inquiry
in the future. In this volume, for instance, Lisa Rofel, explores the Chinese equivalent of the
Western concept of cosmopolitanism and Sudarsan Padmanabhan undertakes a similar analysis
4
Introduction
in the case of the cosmopolitan cultures of India, as does Yoshio Sugimoto with respect to Japa-
nese cosmopolitanism.
This approach is not without its risks. It would not be helpful if the universalistic impulse
within cosmopolitanism were pluralized to a point that we end up with a diversity of cosmopoli-
tan cultures or a counter-Western cosmopolitanism. As Daniel Chernilo argues in his contribu-
tion to this volume, cosmopolitanism necessarily requires a certain degree of universalism, though
such a universalism must be differentiated and qualified. There is no genuine cosmopolitan posi-
tion, he argues, without a universalistic orientation that upholds the idea of humanity. There is
also the separate question whether normative or descriptive claims are being made. A possible
way forward that will avoid the pitfalls of relativism and universalism is to locate the cosmopoli-
tan imaginary as an orientation or self-understanding that exists within all world cultures and
while taking a diversity of historical forms is always a response to the widening of human experi-
ence and the broadening of political community. In her chapter on cosmopolitanism in Africa,
Sarah Balakrishnan avoids any discussion of a civilizational particularness and concentrates on
a new kind of civic cosmopolitanism among activists. This is an interesting contrast to Andrew
Hartman’s characterization of American cosmopolitanism in terms of a model of decline arising
out of a pluralism which has not in fact led to greater cosmopolitanism. Whether or not such
a sense of a decline in the fortunes of American cosmopolitanism is warranted, his chapter is a
reminder that cultural pluralization is not always a basis for cosmopolitanism. In much the same
terms, Keith Jacobs and Jeff Malpas claim that in the case of Australia and New Zealand both
societies have been led, not towards more inclusive social and political formations, but instead
to policies that have encouraged increased insularity, individualization and exclusion. From a
different theoretical framework, Maurice Roche writing on Europe suggests that it is necessary
to maintain a clear distinction between the concept’s normative and analytic meanings, and to
focus on the latter. His argument is that the concept of ‘cosmopolitan order’ can be useful in
addressing the social context of cosmopolitanism in terms of cultural mixtures, social openness
and common power regimes rather than focusing on attitudes and values. He claims that deep
and long-term trends in Europe and the EU have operated to promote cosmopolitanism in the
form of cosmopolitan social orders.
As is apparent from the above mentioned chapters in Part IV, it is possible to find a way to con-
ceive of varieties of cosmopolitanism in ways that do not entail the negation of universality and it
is possible to do this in both historical and contemporary perspective. The key to this is the identi-
fication of alternative conceptions of what constitutes community as co-existence and as a broad-
ening of horizons whether on national or transnational levels. This at least is a starting point for a
basic definition of cosmopolitanism, which must be seen as extending into more complex levels
of critical awareness and different orientations. And as several chapters argue, cosmopolitanism is
not an historically invariable condition, but has shifted several times in history, as is vividly clear
in the case of South America, China and India. The interrelation of European and non-European
cosmopolitanism cultures should also be considered, a theme that is more present in Aurea Mota’s
account of Latin American expressions of cosmopolitanism as well as in Huon Wardle’s discus-
sion of ethnographies of cosmopolitanism in the Caribbean. Wardle, for instance, points out how
widespread horror at Caribbean slavery played an important role in the emergence of European
Enlightenment cosmopolitanism. Aurea Mota argues for the global relevance of the adoption of
the liberal project in early nineteenth century South American after independence and the idea of
a Latin American cosmopolitanism that can only be seen as part of a wider world phenomenon of
which it was a part. This corrects a major Eurocentric view of world history that liberal democ-
racy was primarily a European development when, in fact, one of the most extensive experiments
with democracy occurred in Latin America in the nineteenth century. According to Humeira
5
Gerard Delanty
Iqtidar, if cosmopolitanism is understood as a distancing of the self, the ability to re-evaluate one’s
own norms and practices, then it can be found in many instances of Islamic culture where the
groups in question have developed those capabilities. In this view, Bryan S. Turner argues that
cosmopolitanism is neither new nor necessarily secular. Stoicism, for instance, contributed sig-
nificantly to the origins of cosmopolitanism, but its real driving force was religious. This is, too,
a reminder that cosmopolitanism should not be equated with diverse and transnationally mobile
urban population, including in global cities, as Yeoh and Weiqiang argue, for cosmopolitanism is
about engaging with others and is to be found in locations that are not necessarily global spaces.
In light of the above considerations a cosmopolitan approach does offer an alternative way to
view major social change today from some of the dominant approaches, of which there are essen-
tially three. One view is that as a result of global transformations there is increased homogeniza-
tion in the world today. This thesis of homogenization has been reflected in diverse views ranging
from implausible notions of the ‘end of history’ as a condition in which liberal democracy has
become the dominant political system to more convincing arguments about societal conver-
gences or the increasing importance of a ‘world culture’ or a dominant global culture eroding
national or local cultures. Contrary to this is an approach that would see less convergence than
greater divergence and, eventually but not inevitably, polarization. In the extreme it amounts to
a notion of a clash of civilizations. Clearly both processes of convergence and divergence are in
evidence in almost every part of the world and any account of social change will need to account
for both. However, it is out of dissatisfaction with these accounts that alternative accounts have
been put forward which see as the distinctive feature a process of hybridization in which cultures
merge in a continuous creation of new forms. Cultures do not collide, but borrow from each
other and adapt in different ways without an overall convergence being the result. This is often
taken to be a case for cosmopolitanism. However, cosmopolitanism properly defined is not a
condition of hybridization, but one of the creative interaction of cultures and the exploration of
shared worlds. As such, it suggests heightened reflexivity.
While it can be argued that all cultures are in some way the product of cultural mixing, a
point is generally reached whereby the cultural form ceases to be conscious of its hybridity and
with the passage of time it takes on a more solidified character. At this point, the cultural entity
in question will take on another character and the result may be surrender to a global culture, or
itself become a global culture, or a process of polarization sets in. Distinct from the aforemen-
tioned processes, a fourth scenario is thus possible and can be termed a unity in diversity. In this
case the distinctive development is less a mixing of cultures and the production of new hybrid
forms, than a reflexive inter-relation of cultures whereby the cultures undergo some change as a
result of exchange. Diversity is not eradicated by mixing but also does not result in polarization.
While diversity is preserved, there is a also a degree of unity between the elements but without
a dominant culture taking over. So, instead of a single culture emerging, the cultures co-exist
through the creation of frameworks of solidarity and integration. This is essentially what cosmo-
politanism seeks to identify and, as I argue, with Neal Harris, in our contribution to this volume,
the approach that describes it a critical cosmopolitanism.
Does this mean that cosmopolitanism no longer has any relation with the political tradition
that it is most commonly associated with it, namely the liberal legacy? In modern political phi-
losophy cosmopolitanism has been in part allied with liberalism in that the moral and political
values associated with cosmopolitanism are an extension of the liberal values of freedom, toler-
ance, respect for the individual, egalitarianism, etc. It has been mostly the case that cosmopolitan
virtues have been espoused within the context of a broader embracing of liberal values. Despite
the turn to cultural context today and the recognition of a multiplicity of cosmopolitan projects,
one should not conclude that liberalism and cosmopolitanism have entirely decoupled, as Aurea
6
Introduction
Mota has argued in her chapter on Latin American cosmopolitanism. The liberal legacy itself has
been diverse and like cosmopolitanism it is open to different interpretations.
The chapters written for this volume reflect the broad reception of cosmopolitan thought
in a wide variety of disciplines, ranging from philosophy, literary theory and history to inter-
national relations, anthropology, communications studies and sociology. Part I presents gener-
ally theoretical approaches in which some of the major developments in recent theorizing are
discussed. Given the wide literature that currently exists on the history of cosmopolitanism
and the aspiration to present in this volume new thinking on cosmopolitanism, the chapters
concentrate on recent developments, including the relationship between cosmopolitan theory
and empirical social research, as in the two chapters by Victor Roudometof and Ian Woodward
and Zlatko Skrbis. David Inglis’s chapter offers a succinct account of how much of the classi-
cal legacy can be reclaimed. The next two sections contain chapters respectively on the cultural
and political conceptions of cosmopolitanism. Despite the arbitrariness of the distinction, it is in
line with what is still a significant division within the literature on cosmopolitanism, which on
the whole tends to be divided between largely cultural approaches and those that derive from
normative political theory. The chapters by Sassatelli and Papastergiadis are good examples of
attempts to link normative and empirical approaches with respect to cultural analysis. Of all the
social sciences, anthropology has been at the forefront in advocating cosmopolitan interpreta-
tions and in the chapter on this topic by Pnina Werbner there is a strong emphasis on the ethical
significance of cosmopolitanism. Other topics include communications, religion, cities, aesthet-
ics, education and memory. The chapters in Part III on cosmopolitics typically address aspects of
political community such as citizenship, human rights, democracy, equality and justice, solidarity,
humanitarianism and global civil society. Finally, Part IV, as discussed above, offers wide-ranging
accounts of world varieties of cosmopolitanism. The rationale here is that cosmopolitanism today
must be taken out of its exclusive Western context and related to the historical experiences of
other world cultures. In this vein, there are chapters on cosmopolitanism in the Caribbean,
Latin America, China, Japan and Africa as well as in major parts of the Western world, such as
Europe, the United States, Australia and New Zealand. Another chapter by He and Brown deals
specifically with more general Asian perspectives on cosmopolitanism that go beyond specific
civilizational and national forms. Indeed, in their account normative transnationalism is one of
the most important expressions of Asian cosmopolitanism. Pheng Cheah’s chapter reconstructs
and offers a critical assessment of Benedict Anderson’s unexpected turn to cosmopolitanism
from the latter half of the 2000s to his posthumous memoir. It compares Anderson’s account of a
normative Southeast Asian cosmopolitanism that arose during the colonial period to earlier argu-
ments about Southeast Asian cultural identity and the recent attempt of ASEAN (Association of
Southeast Asian Nations) states to foster a socio-cultural identity for the region. Although not a
regionally based cosmopolitanism, the final chapter by Michael L. Miller and Scott Ury looks at
Jewish cosmopolitanism as a major world variety.
Given the diversity of approaches and applications an overall synthesis or summary is difficult.
As I suggested in my own contribution, co-authored with Neal Harris, cosmopolitanism can
be characterized as comprising three dimensions. Firstly, cosmopolitanism concerns empirical
phenomena which can be best described as forms of experience. In this sense, cosmopolitan-
ism can be said to be real in that it concerns real experiences. Secondly, cosmopolitan concerns
particular kinds of experience that entail their own interpretation. In this second sense, the
normative component of cosmopolitanism is an empirically grounded one. It is on this level
that the social imaginary of cosmopolitanism can be located. Thirdly, it is possible to speak of a
higher level of interpretation that goes beyond those that are rooted in people’s experiences of the
world, namely evaluations, by which are intended philosophical and social scientific reflections
7
Gerard Delanty
Bibliography
Apel, K.-O. 2000. ‘Globalization and the Need for Universal Ethics: The Problem in Light of Discourse
Ethics’, European Journal of Social Theory, 3(2): 137–55.
Appiah, K. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: Norton.
Beck, U. 2006. The Cosmopolitan Outlook. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. and Grande, E. 2007. Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benhabib, S. 2008. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bohman, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds.) 1997. Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal. Cam-
bridge, MA: MIT Press.
Breckenridge, C.A. et al. (eds.) 2002. Cosmopolitanism. Durham, NJ: Duke University Press.
Brenan, T. 1997. At Home in the World: Cosmopolitanism Now. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (eds.) 2005. The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Cheah, P. and Robbins, B. (eds.) 1998. Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation. Minneapolis:
Minnesota University Press.
Clifford, J. 1997. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: MA: Harvard Uni-
versity Press.
Delanty, G. 2009. The Cosmopolitan Imagination: The Renewal of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Delanty, G. and He, B. 2008. ‘Comparative Perspectives on Cosmopolitanism: Assessing European and Asia
Perspectives’, International Sociology, 23(3): 323–44.
Delanty, G. and Inglis, D. (eds.) 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences. 4 vols. London:
Routledge.
Fine, R. 2007. Cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge.
Hannerz, U. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge.
Harrington, A. 2004. ‘Ernst Troeltsch’s Concept of Europe’, European Journal of Social Theory, 7: 479–98.
Held, D. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ingram, J.D. 2013. Radical Cosmopolitics: The Ethics and Politics of Democratic Universalism. New York: Colum-
bia University Press.
Kendall, G., Woodward, I. and Skrbis, Z. 2009. The Sociology of Cosmopolitanism. London: Palgrave.
Kurasawa, F. 2007. The Work of Global Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linklater, A 1998. The Transformation of Political Community. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nussbaum, M. 1996. ‘Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism’, in Cohen, J. (ed.), For Love of Country: Debating the
Limits of Patriotism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robbins, B. and Horta, P.L. (eds.) 2017. Cosmopolitanisms. New York: New York University Press.
Rumford, C. (ed.) 2006. Cosmopolitanism and Europe. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Rumford, C. 2008. Cosmopolitan Spaces: Europe, Globalization, Theory. London: Routledge.
Schlereth, T. 1977. The Cosmopolitan Ideal in Enlightenment Thought. South Bend, IN: University of Notre
Dame University Press.
Stevenson, N. 2002. Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Questions. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tan, K.-C. 2004. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Toulmin, S. 1992. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, B.S. 2001. ‘Cosmopolitan Virtue: On Religion in a Global Age’, European Journal of Social Theory,
4(2): 131–52.
Turner, B.S. 2002. ‘Cosmopolitan Virtue: Globalization and Patriotism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 19(1):
45–63.
Vertovec, S. and Cohen, R. (eds.) 2002. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Werbner, P. (ed.) 2008. Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Berg.
8
Introduction
Apel, K.-O. 2000. ‘Globalization and the Need for Universal Ethics: The Problem in Light of Discourse
Ethics’, European Journal of Social Theory, 3(2): 137–155.
Appiah, K. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: Norton.
Beck, U. 2006. The Cosmopolitan Outlook. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. and Grande, E. 2007. Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benhabib, S. 2008. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bohman, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds.) 1997. Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Breckenridge, C.A. (eds.) 2002. Cosmopolitanism. Durham, NJ: Duke University Press.
Brenan, T. 1997. At Home in the World: Cosmopolitanism Now. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (eds.) 2005. The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Cheah, P. and Robbins, B. (eds.) 1998. Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation.
Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Clifford, J. 1997. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: MA: Harvard
University Press.
Delanty, G. 2009. The Cosmopolitan Imagination: The Renewal of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Delanty, G. and He, B. 2008. ‘Comparative Perspectives on Cosmopolitanism: Assessing European and
Asia Perspectives’, International Sociology, 23(3): 323–344.
Delanty, G. and Inglis, D. (eds.) 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences. 4 vols.
London: Routledge.
Fine, R. 2007. Cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge.
Hannerz, U. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge.
Harrington, A. 2004. ‘Ernst Troeltsch’s Concept of Europe’, European Journal of Social Theory, 7: 479–498.
Held, D. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ingram, J.D. 2013. Radical Cosmopolitics: The Ethics and Politics of Democratic Universalism. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Kendall, G. , Woodward, I. and Skrbis, Z. 2009. The Sociology of Cosmopolitanism. London: Palgrave.
Kurasawa, F. 2007. The Work of Global Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linklater, A 1998. The Transformation of Political Community. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nussbaum, M. 1996. ‘Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism’, in Cohen, J. (ed.), For Love of Country: Debating the
Limits of Patriotism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robbins, B. and Horta, P.L. (eds.) 2017. Cosmopolitanisms. New York: New York University Press.
Rumford, C. (ed.) 2006. Cosmopolitanism and Europe. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Rumford, C. 2008. Cosmopolitan Spaces: Europe, Globalization, Theory. London: Routledge.
Schlereth, T. 1977. The Cosmopolitan Ideal in Enlightenment Thought. South Bend, IN: University of Notre
Dame University Press.
Stevenson, N. 2002. Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Questions. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tan, K.-C. 2004. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. 1992. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, B.S. 2001. ‘Cosmopolitan Virtue: On Religion in a Global Age’, European Journal of Social Theory,
4(2): 131–152.
Turner, B.S. 2002. ‘Cosmopolitan Virtue: Globalization and Patriotism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 19(1):
45–63.
Vertovec, S. and Cohen, R. (eds.) 2002. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Werbner, P. (ed.) 2008. Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Berg.
Alt-histories of cosmopolitanism
Alexander, J. (1987) ‘The Centrality of the Classics’, in A. Giddens and J. Turner (eds.) Social Theory Today,
Cambridge: Polity, pp. 11–55.
Appiah, K.A. (1996) ‘Cosmopolitan Patriots’, in J. Cohen (ed.) For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of
Patriotism, Cambridge: Beacon, pp. 21–29.
Baldry, H.C. (1965) The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Benhabib, S. (2008) Another Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford UP.
Boas, F. (1928) Anthropology in Modern Life, New York: Norton.
Breckenridge, C.A. (eds.) (2002) Cosmopolitanism, Durham: Duke UP.
Cheah, P. (2006) ‘Cosmopolitanism’, Theory Culture and Society, 23(2–3): 486–496.
Chernilo, D. (2007) ‘A Quest for Universalism: Re-assessing the Nature of Classical Social Theory’s
Cosmopolitanism’, European Journal of Social Theory, 10(1): 17–35.
Cicero (1972) The Nature of the Gods, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Delanty, G. (2006) ‘The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory’, British
Journal of Sociology, 57(1): 25–47.
Delanty, G. (2009) The Cosmopolitan Imagination: The Renewal of Critical Social Theory, Cambridge:
Cambridge UP.
Delanty, G. and Inglis, D. (2010) ‘An Overview of the Field of Cosmopolitan Studies’, in G. Delanty and D.
Inglis (eds.) Cosmopolitanism: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences, 4 volumes, London: Routledge, pp.
1–27.
Diodorus (1968) Diodorus of Sicily, in Twelve Volumes, C.H. Oldfather (trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Durkheim, Ė. (1915) ‘Germany Above All: German Mentality and War’, Pamphlet, Paris: Librairie Armand
Colin.
Durkheim, Ė. (1964 [1893]) The Division of Labour in Society, New York: Free Press.
Durkheim, Ė. (1992) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals, Cornelia Brookfield trans., London: Routledge.
Durkheim, Ė. (2001) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, Carol Gosman trans., New York: Oxford
UP.
Fanon, F. (1968) The Wretched of the Earth, New York: Grove Press.
Fanon, F. (1970) Toward the African Revolution, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Fine, R. (2003a) ‘Kant’s Theory of Cosmopolitanism and Hegel’s Critique’, Philosophy and Social Criticism,
29(6): 609–630.
Fine, R. (2003b) ‘Taking the ‘Ism’ out of Cosmopolitanism: An Essay in Reconstruction’, European Journal of
Social Theory, 6(4): 451–470.
Friedrich, C.J. (1947) ‘The Ideology of the United Nations Charter and the Philosophy of Peace of Immanuel
Kant 1795–1945’, The Journal of Politics, 9(1): 10–30.
Fustel de Coulanges, N. St. D. (1893) ‘Polybe ou La Grece Conquise Par les Romains’, in Questions
Historiques, Paris: Hachette.
Go, J. (2013) ‘Fanon’s Postcolonial Cosmopolitanism’, European Journal of Social Theory, 16(2): 208–225.
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (2000) A Guide to Greek Thought: Major Figures and Trends, Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Habermas, J. (1997) ‘Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years Hindsight’, in
Bohman, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds.) Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 113–154.
Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, Cambridge: Polity.
Heater, D. (1996) World Citizenship and Government: Cosmopolitan Ideas in the History of Western Political
Thought. London: Macmillan.
Hobbes, T. (1968) Leviathan, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Holton, R. (2009) Cosmopolitanisms: New Thinking and New Directions, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Inglis, D. (2011) ‘Mapping Global Consciousness: Portuguese Imperialism and the Forging of Modern Global
Sensibilities, Globalizations, 8(5): 1–16.
Inglis, D. and Robertson, R. (2004) ‘Beyond the Gates of the Polis: Reworking the Classical Roots of
Classical Sociology’, Journal of Classical Sociology, 4(2): 165–189.
Inglis, D. and Robertson, R. (2005) ‘The Ecumenical Analytic: ‘Globalization’, Reflexivity and the Revolution
in Greek Historiography’, European Journal of Social Theory, 8(2): 99–122.
Inglis, D. and Robertson, R. (2006) ‘Discovering the World: Cosmopolitanism and Globality in the “Eurasian”
Renaissance’, in Delanty, G. (ed.) Europe and Asia Beyond East and West: Towards a New
Cosmopolitanism, London: Rout-ledge, pp. 92–106.
Inglis, D. and Robertson, R. (2008) ‘The Elementary Forms of Globality: Durkheim and the Emergence and
Nature of Global Life’, Journal of Classical Sociology, 8(1): 5–25.
Iggers, G. (1958) The Doctrine of Saint-Simon: An Exposition, Boston: Beacon.
Kant, I. (1963a) ‘Idea for a Universal History From a Cosmopolitan Point of View’, in On History, New York:
Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 11–26.
Kant, I. (1963b) ‘Perpetual Peace’, in On History, New York: Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 85–135.
Kauppi, M. and Viotti, P. (1998) The Global Philosophers, New York: Lexington.
Keane, J. (2003) Global Civil Society, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Krishna, S. (2008) Globalization and Postcolonialism, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Lu, C. (2000) ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2):
244–267.
Lukes, S. (1973) Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. A Historical and Critical Survey, London: Allen Lane.
Marcus Aurelius (1995) Meditations, Penguin: Harmondsworth.
Meinecke, F. (1970) Cosmopolitanism and the National State, Princeton: Princeton UP.
Meron, T. (1991) ‘Common Rights of Mankind in Gentili, Grotius and Suarez’, American Journal of
International Law, 85(1): 110–116.
Mignolo, W. (2000) ‘The Many Faces of Cosmopolis: Border Thinking and Critical Cosmopolitanism’, Public
Culture, 12(3): 721–748.
Mortley, R. (1996) The Idea of Universal History from Hellenistic Philosophy to Early Christian
Historiography, Lewiston: Mellen.
Murphy, C.F., Jr. (1982) ‘The Grotian Vision of World Order’, American Journal of International Law, 76(3):
477–498.
Niezen, R. (2004) A World Beyond Difference, Oxford: Blackwell.
Nowicka, M. and Rovisco, M. (eds.) (2009) Cosmopolitanism in Practice, Farnham: Ashgate.
Nussbaum, M. (1989) ‘Recoiling from Reason’, New York Review of Books, 36(19): 36–41.
Nussbaum, M. (1997) ‘Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism’. Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(1): 1–25.
Ortega, M.C. (1996) ‘Vitoria and the Universalist Conception of International Relations’, in Clark, I. and
Neumann, I.B. (eds.) Classical Theories of International Relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Pickering, M. (1989) ‘New Evidence of the Link between Comte and German Philosophy’, Journal of the
History of Ideas, 50(3): 443–463.
Pieterse, J.N. (2006) ‘Emancipatory Cosmopolitanism: Towards an Agenda’, Development and Change,
37(6): 1247–1257.
Plutarch (1936) Moralia, Vol. III, Cambridge, MA: Loeb.
Pollock, S. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan and Vernacular in History’, in Carol A. Breckenridge (eds.)
Cosmopolitanism, Durham: Duke UP, pp. 15–53.
Pound, R. (1925) ‘Grotius in the Science of Law’, American Journal of International Law, 19(4): 685–688.
Polybius (1979) The Rise of the Roman Empire, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Revell, L. (2009) Roman Imperialism and Local Identities, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Robertson, R. and Inglis, D. (2004) ‘The Global Animus: In the Tracks of World-Consciousness’,
Globalizations, 1(1): 38–49.
Romm, J.S. (1992) The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought, Princeton: Princeton UP.
Schlereth, T. (1977) The Cosmopolitan Ideal in Enlightenment Thought. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame UP.
Smith, A. (1976) The Wealth of Nations, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Somers, M. (1996) ‘Where Is Sociology after the Historic Turn?’, in T.J. McDonald (ed.) The Historic Turn in
the Human Sciences, Ann Arbor: Michigan State UP, pp. 53–89.
Sztompka, P. (1993) The Sociology of Social Change, Oxford: Blackwell.
Tilly, C. (ed.) (1975) The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton: Princeton UP.
Toulmin, S. (1990) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press.
Turner, B.S. (2006) ‘Classical Sociology and Cosmopolitanism: A Critical Defence of the Social’, British
Journal of Sociology, 57(1): 133–151.
Vertovec, S. and Cohen, R. (eds.) (2002) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford UP.
Zubaida, S. (1999) ‘Cosmopolitanism and the Middle East’, in R. Meijer (ed.) Cosmopolitanism, Identity and
Authenticity in the Middle East, Richmond: Curzon, pp. 15–34.
World history and cosmopolitanism
Al-Azmeh, A. (2007) ‘Epilogue. Romancing the Prose of the World’, in B. Stråth and H.-Å. Persson (eds.),
Reflections on Europe: Defining a Political Order in Time and Space. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang, pp.
349–376.
Balibar, E. (2003) ‘Europe: An “Unimagined” Frontier of Democracy’, Diacritics, 33(3/4): 36–44.
Balibar, E. (2004) We, The People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Community. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton UP.
Bayly, C.A. and E.F. Biagini (eds.) (2008) Giuseppe Mazzini and the Globalisation of Democratic Nationalism
1830–1920. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Brandt, A. (2010) ‘Weltbürgertum und Nationalidee in Fichtes Bildungskonzept’, in J. Stolzenberg and L.-T.
Ulrichs (eds.), Bildung als Kunst: Fichte, Schiller, Humboldt, Nietzsche. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 59–68.
Chakrabarty, D. (2001) Provincialising Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton:
Princeton UP.
Coller, I. (2010) ‘East of Enlightenment: Regulating Cosmopolitanism between Istanbul and Paris in the
Eighteenth Century’, Journal of World History, 21(3): 447–469.
de Pascale, C. (2003) ‘Fichte und die Gesellschaft’, in H. Grindt and H. Traub (eds.), Praktische und
angewandte Philosophie II. Fichte-Studien. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Systematik der
Tranzendentalphilosophie. Bd 24. Amsterdam: Atlanta/Rodopi.
Dirlik, A. (2006) Global Modernity: Modernity in the Age of Global Capitalism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Fichte, J.G. (2008 [1807–1808]) Reden an die deutsche Nation. Edited by Alexander Aichele . Hamburg:
Meiner.
Forman-Barzilai, F. (2010) Adam Smith and the Circles of Cosmopolitanism and Moral Theory. Cambridge:
Cambridge UP.
Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2011) The Origin of Political Order. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Fukuyama, F. (2014) Political Order and Political Decay. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Hannerz, U. (1990) ‘Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture’, in M. Featherstone (ed.), Global Culture:
Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity. London: Sage.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1995 [1830–1831]) ‘Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Weltgeschichte. Einleitung’, in W.
Jaeschke (ed.), G W F Hegel. Gesammelte Werke. Bd 18 Vorlesungsmanuskripte II (1816–1831). Hamburg:
Meiner.
Herren, M. (2009) Internationale Organisationen. Eine Globalgeschichte der internationalen Ordnung seit
1865. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Hill, L. (2007) ‘The New Strangership: Adam Smith’s Commercial Cosmopolitanism’. Unpublished Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Chicago, August 30.
Höfert, A. (2007) ‘“Europe” and “Religion” in the Framework of Sixteenth-century Relations Between
Christian Powers and the Ottoman Empire’, in B. Stråth and H.-Å. Persson (eds.), Reflections on Europe:
Defining a Political Order in Time and Space. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.
Kant, I. (1784) ‘Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht’ [‘Idea for a Universal
History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View’] in Berlinische Monatsschrift 4(1784): 385–411.
Koskenniemi, M. (2001) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Lake, M. (2010) ‘Chinese Colonists Assert Their “Common Human Rights”: Cosmopolitanism as Subject and
Method of History’, Journal of World History, 21(3): 375–392.
Majumdar, R. (2010) Writing Postcolonial History. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Mazzini, G. (2009) A Cosmopolitanism of Nations. Giuseppe Mazzini’s Writings on Democracy, Nation
Building, and International Relations. Recchia, S. and N. Urbinati (eds.) Princeton: Princeton UP.
Meinecke, F. (1911 2nd rev ed [1907]) Weltbürgertum und Nationalstaat. Studien zur Genesis des
deutschen Nationalstaates. München and Berlin: Oldenbourg.
Müller, C. (2014) ‘The Politics of Expertise. The Association Internationale pour le Progrès des Sciences
Sociales. Democratic Peace Movements and International Law Networks in Europe 1858–1875’, in D.
Rodogno , B. Struck and J. Vogel (eds.), Shaping the Transnational Sphere: Experts, Networks, and Issues
From the 1840s to the 1930s. New York: Berghahn.
Murphy, C.N. (1994) International Organizations and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850.
Oxford: Oxford UP.
Pollock, S. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan and Vernacular in History’, in C. Breckenridge , S. Pollock , H. Bhabha and
D. Chakrabarty (eds.), Cosmopolitanis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Radrizzani, I. (1990) ‘Ist Fichte’s Modell des Kosmopolitismus pluralistisch?’, in Fichte-Studien. Beiträge zur
Geschichte und Systematik der Tranzendentalphilosophie. Bd 2. Amsterdam: Atlanta/Rodopi.
Saïd, E. (1978) Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Routledge.
Stråth, B. (ed.) (2000) After Full Employment: European Discourses on Work and Flexibility. Brussels: PIE-
Peter Lang.
Stråth, B. (2016) Europe’s Utopias of Peace: 1815, 1919, 1951. London: Bloomsbury.
Stråth, B. and P. Wagner (2017) European Modernity: A Global Approach. London: Bloomsbury.
Tilly, C. (1990) Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wagner, P. (2015) Progress: A Reconstruction. Cambridge: Polity.
Aesthetic cosmopolitanism
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at Large, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Appiah, K. (2006) Cosmopolitanism, New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Balibar, É. (2007) On Universalism in Debate with Alain Badiou, translated by Mary O’Neill .
http://eipcp.net/transversal/0607/balibar/en (accessed March 2009).
Beck, U. (2006) The Cosmopolitan Vision, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bhabha, H. (1996) ‘Unsatisfied: Notes on Vernacular Cosmopolitanism’, in Garcia-Morean, L. and Pfiefe,
R.P. (eds.), Text and Nation, London: Camden House, pp 191–207.
Birnbaum, D. (2008) The Hospitality of Presence: Problems of Otherness in Husserl’s Phenomenology, New
York: Sternberg Press.
Burgin, V. (1986) The End of Art Theory, London: MacMillan.
Castoriadis, C. (1997a) World in Fragments, edited and translated by David A. Curtis, Stanford: Stanford
University Press.
Castoriadis, C. (1997b) The Castoriadis Reader, translated by David Ames Curtis , Oxford: Blackwell.
Castoriadis, C. (1997c) The Imaginary Institution of Society, translated by Kathleen Blamey , Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Chaudhuri, A. (2000) ‘Cosmopolitanism’s Alien Face’, New Left Review, 55(Jan–Feb) pp 75–84.
Cheetham, M. (2009) ‘Theory reception: Panofsky, Kant, and disciplinary cosmopolitanism’, Journal of Art
Historiography, 1, Page/record No.: 1-KJ/3.
www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=journal&issn=20424752&volume=1&issue=&date=2009 (accessed
December 2010).
Clark, T. (1982) Image of the People, Gustave Courbet and the 1848 Revolution, Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Danto, A. (1992) Beyond the Brillo Box: The Visual Arts in Post Historical Perspective, New York: Farrar,
Strauss, Giroux.
Delanty, G. (2009) The Cosmopolitan Imagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enwezor, O. (2004) ‘Documentary/Verite: Bio-Politics, Human Rights and the Figure of “Truth” in
Contemporary Art’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art, 4/5(1): 11–42.
Ferguson, B. and Hoegsberg, M. (2010) ‘Talking and Thinking about Biennials: The Potential of Discursivity’,
in Filipovic, E. , Van Hal, M. and Ovstebo, S. (eds.), The Biennial Reader, Bergen: Bergen Kunsthall & Hatje
Cantz.
Gillick, L. (2000) Renovation Filter: Recent Past and Near Future, Bristol: Arnolfini Gallery Publications.
Gillick, L. (2007) www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/artblog/2007/may/22/isthereanythingforarttosay
(accessed March 10 2009).
Gillick, L. (2010) Contemporary Art Does Not Account for That Which Is Taking Place. http://e-
flux.com/journal/view/192 (accessed 20 December 2010).
Held, D. (1995) Democracy and Global Order, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hsu, M. (2005) ‘Networked Cosmopolitanism on Cultural Exchange and International Exhibitions’, in
Tsoutas, N. (ed.), Knowledge + Dialogue + Exchange: Remapping Cultural Globalism from the South,
Sydney: Artspace.
Kearney, R. (1988) The Wake of the Imagination, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lutticken, S. (2009) Idols of the Market, New York: Sternberg Press.
Meskimmon, M. (2011) Contemporary Art and the Cosmopolitan Imagination, London: Routledge.
Mitter, P. and Mercer, K. (2005) ‘Reflections on Modern Art and National Identity in Colonial India’, in Mercer,
K. (ed.), Cosmopolitan Modernism, London: INIVA & MIT Press.
Mouffe, C. (2009) ‘Politics and Artistic Practices in Post-Utopian Times’, in Szewczyk, M. (ed.), Meaning
Liam Gillick, London: MIT Press.
Neshat, S. quoted in Chin Tao Wu . (2007) ‘Worlds Apart: Problems of Interpreting Globalized Art’, Third
Text, 21(6): 719–731.
Oestreich, G. (1982) Neostoicism and the Early Modern State, edited by B. Oestreich and H.G.
Koenigsberger , translated by D. Mclintock , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rancière, J. (2004a) The Politics of Aesthetics, translated by Gabriel Rockhill , London: Continuum.
Rancière, J. (2004b) The Philosopher and His Poor, translated by John Duru , Durham: Duke University
Press.
Rancière, J. (2007a) ‘Art of the Possible’, Artforum, XLV(7).
Rancière, J. (2007b) ‘The Emancipated Spectator’, Artforum, XlV(7).
Rancière, J. (2007c) The Future of the Image, translated by Gregory Elliott , London: Verso.
Rancière, J. (2009) Aesthetics and Its Discontents, translated by Steven Corcoran , Cambridge: Polity
Books.
Raunig, G. (2002) A War Machine against the Empire: On the Precarious Nomadism of the Publix Theatre
Caravan. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0902/raunig/en (accessed March 2008).
Raunig, G. (2007) Art and Revolution: Transversal Activism in the Long Twentieth Century, translated by
Aileen Derieg , Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Regev, M. (2007) ‘Cultural Uniqueness and Aesthetic Cosmopolitanism’, European Journal of Social Theory,
10(1): 123–138.
Retort ( Iain Boal , T.J. Clark , Joseph Matthews , Michael Watts ) (2006) Afflicted Powers: Capital and
Spectacle in a New Age of War, London: Verso.
Sakai, N. (1997) Translation and Subjectivity, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Summers, D. (2003) Real Spaces, World Art History and the Rise of Western Modernism, London: Phaidon
Books.
Szewczyk, M. (2009) Meaning Liam Gillick, London: MIT Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2003) The Decline of American Power, New York: New Press.
Werbner, P. (2006) ‘Vernacular Cosmopolitanism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3): 496–498.
Interspecies cosmopolitanism
Adorno, T.W. (2004) Negative Dialectics, London and New York: Routledge.
Ahlhaus, S. and Niesen, P. eds. (2015) ‘Animal Politics. A New Research Agenda. Forum I’, Historical Social
Research-Historische Sozialforschung, Vol. 40, No. 4, 7–31.
Bentham, J. (1843) The Works Jeremy Bentham, Edinburgh and London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co.
Bentham, J. (2007) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Mineola, New York: Dover
Publications Inc.
Buffon, Georges Louis Leclerc, Comte de (1749–1804) Historie Naturelle, générale et particulière, avec la
description du Cabinet du Roi. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.
Butler, J. (2011) ‘Is Judaism Zionism?’, in E. Mendieta and J. VanAnterwen (eds.), The Power of Religion in
the Public Sphere, New York: Columbia University Press.
Calarco, M. (2008) Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida, New York:
Columbia University Press.
Calarco, M. (2015) Thinking through Animals: Identity, Difference, Indistinction, Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Derrida, J. (2008) The Animal That Therefore I Am, New York: Fordham University Press.
Despret, V. (2004) ‘The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis’, Body and Society, Vol. 10,
Nos. 2–3, 111–134.
Dionigi, I. (2011) ‘ Res publica naturalis: animali politici’, in I. Dionigi (ed.), Animalia, Milano: BUR Saggi
Iuglio, 51–66.
Donaldson, S. and Kymlicka, W. (2011) Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, M. (2003) ‘Society Must Be Defended’ Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976, New York:
Picador.
Habermas, J. (1992) Postmetaphysical Thinking, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application:Remarks on Discourse Ethics, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and
Democracy, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2010) ‘Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights’, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 41,
No. 4, 464–480.
Habermas, J. (2017) Postmetaphysical Thinking II, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Haraway, D. (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness, Chicago:
Prickly Paradigm Press.
Haraway, D.J. (2008) When Species Meet, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D.J. (2016a) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham and London: Duke
University Press.
Haraway, D.J. (2016b) Manifestly Haraway, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Klaits, B. and Klaits, J. (ed.) (1974) Animals and Man in Historical Perspective, New York: Harper
Torchbooks.
Kleingeld, P. (2011) Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Idea of World Citizenship, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Kolbert, E. (2009) ‘The Sixth Extinction? There Have Been Five Great Die-Offs in History, this Time the
Cataclysm Is Us’, The New Yorker, Vol. 85, No. 15, 53.
Kolbert, E. (2014) The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Macdonald, M. (1984) ‘Natural Rights’, in J. Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights, Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Mendieta, E. (2009) ‘From Imperial to Dialogical Cosmopolitanism’, Ethics & Global Politics, Vol. 2, No. 3,
241–258.
Mendieta, E. (2010) ‘“Interspecies Cosmopolitanism: Towards a Discourse Ethics Grounding of Animal
Rights”, in Cynthia Willett and Leonard Lawlor (eds.), Recenterings of Continental Philosophy, Vol 35’, SPEP
Supplement 2010 of Philosophy Today, Vol. 54, 208–216.
Mendieta, E. (2015) ‘The Bio-technological scala naturae and Interspecies Cosmopolitanism: Patricia
Piccinini, Jane Alexander, and Guillermo Gómez-Peña’, in V. Cisney and N. Morar (eds.), Biopower:
Foucault and Beyond, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 158–179.
Oliver, K. (2009) Animal Lessons: How They Teach Us to Be Human, New York: Columbia University Press.
Quammen, D. (2008) ‘Planet of Weeds’, in D. Quammen (ed.), Natural Acts: A Sidelong View of Science and
Nature, New York and London: Norton, 161–188.
Stengers, I. (2010) Cosmopolitics I, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Toulmin, S. (1990) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wolfe, C. (2013) Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame, Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Cosmocitizens?
Beitz, C.R. (1999) Political Theory and International Relations (2nd edition), Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Bellamy, R. (2017) ‘A European Republic of Sovereign States: Sovereignty, Republicanism and the
European Union’, European Journal of Political Theory, 16(2): 188–209.
Bohman, J. (2004) ‘Republican Cosmopolitanism’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(3): 336–352.
Bohman, J. (2008) ‘Nondomination and Transnational Democracy’, in C. Laborde and J. Maynor (eds.),
Republicanism and Political Theory, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Cicero ([44 bc]: 1991) On Duties , M.T. Griffin and E.M. Adkins (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (2006) ‘Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 34(2):
147–175.
Erskine, T. (2008) Embedded Cosmopolitanism: Duties to Strangers and Enemies in a World of ‘Dislocated
Communities’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, R. (1988) ‘What Is So Special about Our Fellow-Countrymen?’, Ethics, 98(4): 663–686.
Goodin, R. (2003) ‘Folie Républicaine’, Annual Review of Political Science, 6: 55–76.
Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance,
Cambridge: Polity.
Ivison, D. (2010) ‘Republican Human Rights?’, European Journal of Political Theory, 9(1): 31–47.
Jones, C. (1999) Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. ([1795] 1970) Political Writings, H. Reiss (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laborde, C. (2010) ‘Republicanism and Global Justice: A Sketch’, European Journal of Political Theory, 9(1):
48–69.
Miller, D. (1995) On Nationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, D. (1999) ‘Bounded Citizenship’, in K. Hutchings and R. Dannreuther (eds.), Cosmopolitan
Citizenship, Houndmills: Macmillan.
Miller, D. (2008) ‘Republicanism, National Identity, and Europe’, in C. Laborde and J. Maynor (eds.),
Republicanism and Political Theory, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Nagel, T. (2005) ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33(2): 113–147.
Pettit, P. (2016) ‘The Globalized Republican Ideal’, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric, 9(1): 47–68.
Pogge, T. (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge: Polity.
Rorty, R. (1998) ‘Justice as a Larger Loyalty’, in P. Cheah and B. Robbins (eds.), Cosmopolitics: Thinking
and Feeling beyond the Nation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rousseau, J.-J. ([1754, c. 1761] 1962) The Political Writings, C.E. Vaughan (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Scanlon, T.M. (1996) ‘The Difficulty of Tolerance’, in D. Heyd (ed.), Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Scheffler, S. (2001) Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simmons, A.J. (1979) Moral Principles and Political Obligation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Singer, P. (2002) One World, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Singer, P. (2010) The Life You Can Save, New York: Random House.
Skinner, Q. (1998) Liberty Before Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, W. (2007) ‘Cosmopolitan Citizenship: Virtue, Irony and Worldliness’, European Journal of Social
Theory, 10(1): 37–52.
Turner, B. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan Virtue: Globalization and Patriotism’, Theory, Culture and Society, 19(1):
45–63.
van Parijs, P. (2007) ‘International Distributive Justice’, in R. Goodin (eds.), Companion to Contemporary
Political Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.
Vernon, R. (2010) Cosmopolitan Regard: Political Membership and Global Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Viroli, M. (1995) For Love of Country: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism, Oxford: Clarendon.
Walzer, M. (1994) Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad, Notre Dame: University of Notre
Dame Press.
Williams, M.C. (2005) The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Ypi, L. (2008) ‘Statist Cosmopolitanism’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(1): 48–71.
Cosmopolitan diplomacy
Akpınar, P. (2013) ‘Turkey’s Peacebuilding in Somalia: The Limits of Humanitarian Diplomacy’, Turkish
Studies, 14(4): 735–757.
Balcı, A. (2009) ‘The Alliance of Civilizations: The Poverty of the Clash/Alliance Dichotomy?’, Insight Turkey,
11(1): 95–108.
Berridge, G.R. (2001) ‘Machiavelli’, in G.R. Berridge , M. Keens-Soper and T.G. Otte (eds.) Diplomatic
Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Bird, R.C. (2003) ‘Procedural Challenges to Environmental Regulation of Space Debris’, American Business
Law Journal, 40(1): 635–685.
Bjola, C. and Kornprobst, M. (2013) Understanding International Diplomacy: Theory, Practice and Ethics,
London and New York: Routledge.
Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (2005) ‘Introduction’, in G. Brock and H. Brighouse (eds.) The Political
Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Delanty, G. (2006) ‘Introduction: The Idea of a Post-Western Europe’, in G. Delanty (ed.) Europe and Asia
beyond East and West, London: Routledge.
Dobson, A. (2006) ‘Thick Cosmopolitanism’, Political Studies, 54(1): 165–184.
Gaillard, J. , Clavé, E. and Kelman, I. (2008) ‘Wave of Peace? Tsunami Disaster Diplomacy in Aceh,
Indonesia’, Geoforum, 39(1): 511–526.
Ganapati, E.N. , Kelman, I. and Koukis, T. (2010) ‘Analysing Greek-Turkish Disaster-related Cooperation: A
Disaster Diplomacy Perspective’, Cooperation and Conflict, 45(2): 162–185.
Goff, P.M. (2015) ‘Public Diplomacy at the Global Level: The Alliance of Civilizations as a Community of
Practice’, Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3): 402–417.
Haynes, J. (2017) ‘The United Nations Alliance of Civilisations and Global Justice’, Globalizations, 14(7):
1125–1139.
Held, D. (2005) ‘Principles of Cosmopolitan Order’, in G. Brock and H. Brighouse (eds.) The Political
Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingle, H.N. (1976) Nesselrode and the Russian Rapprochement with Britain, 1836–1844, Berkeley and Los
Angeles: University of California Press.
Kelman, I. (2012) Disaster Diplomacy: How Disasters Affect Peace and Conflict, London and New York:
Routledge.
Kissinger, H. (1994) Diplomacy, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Lachmann, N.S. (2011) ‘In the Labyrinth of International Community: The Alliance of Civilizations
Programme at the United Nations’, Cooperation and Conflict, 46(2): 185–200.
Laudy, M. (2000) ‘The Vatican Mediation of the Beagle Channel Dispute: Crisis Intervention and Forum
Building’, in M. Greenberg , J.H. Barton and M.E. McGuinness (eds.) Words over War: Mediation and
Arbitration to Prevent Deadly Conflict, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Lele, A. (ed.) (2012) Decoding the International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities, New Delhi:
Pentagon Press.
Lindsley, L. (1987) ‘The Beagle Channel Settlement: Vatican Mediation Resolves a Century-Old Dispute’,
Journal of Church and State, 29(3): 435–455.
Linklater, A. (1998) The Transformation of Political Community, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market
Studies, 40(2): 235–258.
McKnight, D.S. (1991) ‘Track Two Diplomacy: An International Framework for Controlling Orbital Debris’,
Space Policy, 7(1): 13–22.
Munters, W. (2016) ‘Space Debris: Towards an International Organization?’, Leuven Centre for Global
Governance Studies Working Paper Series, 175 1–50.
Otte, T.G. (2001) ‘Satow’, in G.R. Berridge , M. Keens-Soper and T.G. Otte (eds.) Diplomatic Theory from
Machiavelli to Kissinger, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Percy, T.K. and Landrum, D.B. (2014) ‘Investigation of National Policy Shifts to Impact Orbital Debris
Environments’, Space Policy, 30(1): 23–33.
Perek, L. (1991) ‘Space Debris and the World Community’, Space Policy, 7(1): 9–12.
Regnier, P. (2011) ‘The Emerging Concept of Humanitarian Diplomacy: Identification of a Community of
Practice and Prospects for International Recognition’, International Review of the Red Cross, 93(884):
1211–1237.
Rumford, C. (2008) Cosmopolitan Spaces: Europe, Globalization, Theory, London: Routledge.
Secretary-General of the United Nations (2005) ‘Secretary-General Announces Launch of Alliance of
Civilizations Aimed at Bridging Divides between Societies Exploited by Extremists’, Press Release
SG/SM/10004, 14 July. Available at: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2005/sgsm10004.doc.htm
(accessed 30 March 2018).
Sending, O.J. , Pouliot, V. and Neumann, I.B. (2011) ‘The Future of Diplomacy: Changing Practices,
Evolving Relationships’, International Journal, 66(3): 527–542.
Sharp, P. (1999) ‘For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations’, International
Studies Review, 1(1): 33–57.
Shelledy, R.B. (2004) ‘The Vatican’s Role in Global Politics’, SAIS Review of International Affairs, 24(2):
149–162.
Simpson, P.L.P. (2011) ‘Transcending Justice: Pope John Paul II and Just War’, The Journal of Religious
Ethics, 39(2): 286–298.
Uthup, T. (2010) ‘Bringing Communities Closer: The Role of the Alliance of Civilizations (AoC)’, Crosscur-
rents, 60(3): 402–418.
Walczak, R. (2016) ‘Papel Diplomacy – Characteristics of the Key Issues in Canon Law and International
Law’, The Jurist, 76(1): 489–530.
Watson, A. (1982) Diplomacy: The Dialogue between States, London: Taylor and Francis.
Wien, S. (2015) Ambassador for Peace: How Theodore Roosevelt Won the Nobel Peace Prize, Morrisville,
NC: Lulu Publishing Services.
Caribbean cosmopolitanism
Appiah, A. (1997) ‘Cosmopolitan Patriots’, Critical Inquiry, 23(Spring): 617–639.
Basch, L. , Glick Schiller, N. and C. Szanton Blanc (1993) Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects,
Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation States, Amsterdam: Gordon Breach.
Beck, U. (2004) ‘Cosmopolitical Realism: On the Distinction between Cosmopolitanism in Philosophy and the
Social Sciences’, Global Networks 4(2): 131–156.
Beckford, G. (1972) Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in Plantation Economies in the Third World, New
York: Oxford University Press.
Benitez-Rojo, A. (1996) The Repeating Island: The Caribbean and the Post-Modern Perspective, North
Carolina: Duke University Press.
Besson, J. (2002) Martha Brae’s Two Histories: European Expansion and Caribbean Culture-Building in
Jamaica, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Berg, M. (2011) Diasporic Generations: Memory, Politics and Nation among Cubans in Spain, Oxford:
Berhahn.
Best, L. and K. Levitt (1968) ‘Outlines of a Model of Pure Plantation Economy’, Social and Economic
Studies, XVII(March–December): 283–324.
Best, L. , Levitt, K. and N. Girvan (2009) Essays on the Theory of Plantation Economy: An Institutional and
Historical Approach to Caribbean Economic Development, Mona: University of the West Indies Press.
Bickerton, D. (1975) Dynamics of a Creole System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonilla, Y. (2015) Non-Sovereign Futures, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Brathwaite, E. (1971) The Development of the Creole Society in Jamaica, 1770–1820, Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
Carnegie, C. (2002) Postnationalism Prefigured: Caribbean Borderlands, New Brunswick: Rutgers University
Press.
Clarke, E. (1957) My Mother Who Fathered Me: A Study of the Family in Three Selected Communities,
London: Allen and Unwin.
Clifford, J. (1988) The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature and Art,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crichlow, M. (2009) Globalization and the Post-Creole Imagination: Notes on Fleeing the Plantation, London:
Duke University Press.
Donette, F. (2013) ‘“Transcendental Cosmopolitanism”: Orlando Patterson and the Novel Jamaican 1960s’,
Transnational American Studies, 5(1): 1–14.
Drummond, L. (1980) ‘The Cultural Continuum: A Theory of Intersystems’, Man (N.S.), 15(2): 352–374.
Gellner, E. (1983) Nations and Nationalism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gilroy, P. (2004) After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? London: Routledge.
Gomes, S. (2011) The Social Reproduction of Jamaica Safar in Shashamane, Ethiopia, PhD thesis,
University of St Andrews (Centre for Amerindian, Latin American and Caribbean Studies).
Gonzalez, N.L. (1969) Black Carib Household Structure: A Study of Migration and Modernization, Seattle:
University of Washington Press.
Goodman, N. (1975) ‘Words, Works, Worlds’, Erkenntnis, 9(1): 57–73.
Grund, L. (2017) Aasenîkon! Makushi Travelogues from the Borderlands of Southern Guyana, PhD thesis,
University of St Andrews (Centre for Amerindian, Latin American and Caribbean Studies).
Guadeloupe, F. (2009) ‘“I Is Just Myself”: Writing the Individual in the Anthropology of the Caribbean’,
Etnofoor, 21(1): 79–95.
Hannerz, U. (1989) ‘Notes on the Global Ecumene’, Public Culture, 1(2): 66–75.
Hannerz, U. (1992) ‘The Global Ecumene as a Network of Networks’, in A. Kuper (ed.) Conceptualizing
Society, London: Routledge.
James, C.L.R. ([1963]1989) The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolt, New
York: Vintage Books.
Kant, I. (1988) Perpetual Peace and Other Essays, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Kant, I. (2006) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khan, A. (2001) ‘Journey to the Center of the Earth: The Caribbean as Master Symbol’, Cultural
Anthropology, 16(3): 271–302.
Khan, A. (2012) ‘Islam, Vodou, and the Making of the Afro-Atlantic’, New West Indian Guide, 86(1/2): 29–54.
Lewis, G. (1963) ‘History of the People of Trinidad and Tobago, by Eric Williams: A Review’, Caribbean
Studies 3(1):100–105.
Lugones, M. (1987) ‘Playfulness, “World”-Travelling, and Loving Perception’, Hypatia, 2(2): 3–19.
Mintz, S. (1956) ‘Canemelar: the Culture of a Rural Puerto Rican Sub-Proletariat’, in J. Steward (ed.) The
people of Puerto Rico: A Study in Social Anthropology, St. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Mintz, S. (1971) ‘The Caribbean as a Socio-Cultural Area’, in M. Horowitz (ed.) Peoples and Cultures of the
Caribbean, New York: Natural History Press.
Mintz, S. (1985) Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History, New York: Viking.
Mintz, S. (1996) ‘Enduring Substances, Trying Theories: The Caribbean Region as Oikumene’, Journal of
the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2(2): 289–313.
Mintz, S. (2010) Three Ancient Colonies: Caribbean Variations and Themes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Mintz, S. and R. Price (1992) The Birth of African American Culture: An Anthropological Perspective, Boston:
Beacon Press.
Obermuller, L. (2016) Guyana and Its El Dorados: Forest Resources and the REDD+ Initiative from the
Perspective of Wakokoa and Isseruru, PhD thesis, University of St Andrews (Centre for Amerindian, Latin
American and Caribbean Studies).
Olwig, K.F. (1997) ‘Cultural Sites: Sustaining a Home in a Deterritorialised World’, in K.F. Olwig and K.
Hastrup (eds.) Siting Culture: The Shifting Anthropological Object, London: Routledge.
Olwig, K.F. (2007) Caribbean Journeys: An Ethnography of Home and Migration in Three Family Networks,
Durham: Duke University Press.
Olwig, K.F. (2010) ‘Cosmopolitan Traditions: Caribbean Perspectives’, Social Anthropology, 18(4): 417–425
(Special Issue: A Cosmopolitan Anthropology?).
Olwig, K.F. (2016) ‘Migration as Adventure: Narrative Self-representation among Caribbean Migrants in
Denmark’, Ethnos, Published online: 29 Jul 2016.
Overing, J. (1990) ‘The Shaman as Maker of Worlds: Nelson Goodman in the Amazon’, Journal of the Royal
Anthropological Institute, 25(4): 602–619.
Palmie, S. (2006) ‘Creolization and Its Discontents’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 35: 433–456.
Rapport, N. and R. Stade (2007) ‘A Cosmopolitan Turn – Or Return’, Social Anthropology, 15(2): 223–235.
Rapport, N. and R. Stade (2012) Anyone: The Cosmopolitan Subject of Ethnography, Oxford: Berghahn.
Robotham, D. (1998) ‘Transnationalism in the Caribbean: Formal and Informal’, American Ethnologist, 25(2):
307–321.
Rosenbaum, M. and G. Troccoli (2017) ‘Motivities’, Panel at the Conference of the Society for Caribbean
Studies, 5th July, 2017.
Smith, M.G. (1965) The Plural Society in the British West Indies, London: University of California Press.
Smith, R.T. (1956) The Negro Family in British Guiana, London: Routledge & Paul.
Smith, R.T. (1962) British Guiana, London: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989) The Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Thomas-Hope, E. (1995) ‘The Establishment of a Migration Tradition: British West Indian Movements to the
Hispanic Caribbean in the Century after Emancipation’, in C. Clarke (ed.) Caribbean Social Relations,
Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Trouillot, M.-R. (1992) ‘The Caribbean as an Open Frontier’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 21: 19–42.
Wardle, H. (1995) ‘Kingston, Kant and Common Sense’, Cambridge Anthropology, 18(3): 40–55.
Wardle, H. (1999) ‘Jamaican Adventures: Simmel, Subjectivity and Extraterritoriality in the Caribbean’,
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4): 523–539.
Wardle, H. (2000) An Ethnography of Cosmopolitanism in Kingston, Jamaica, New York: Edwin Mellen
Press.
Wardle, H. (2002) ‘Ambiguation, Disjuncture, Commitment: A Social Analysis of Caribbean Cultural
Creativity’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(3): 493–508.
Wardle, H. (2004) ‘Choosing Parents: Adoption Into a Global Network’, in F. Bowie (ed.) Cross-Cultural
Approaches to Adoption, London: Routledge.
Wardle, H. (2007) ‘A Groundwork for West Indian Cultural Openness’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute, 13(3): 567–583.
Wardle, H. (2010) ‘A Cosmopolitan Anthropology?’, Social Anthropology, 18(4): 381–388 (Special Issue: A
Cosmopolitan Anthropology?).
Wardle, H. (2011a) ‘Ethnography and an Ethnography in the Human Conversation’, Anthropologica, 53(1):
117–127.
Wardle, H. (2011b) ‘The Double Life of MG Smith? Rethinking Caribbean Citizenship beyond, between and
within the National Frame’, in B. Meeks (ed.) MG Smith and the Emergence of Social Anthropology and
Social Theory in the Carribbean and Beyond, Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle Press.
Wardle, H. (2015a) ‘The Artist Carl Abrahams and the Cosmopolitan Work of Centring and Peripheralizing
the Self’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21: 803–819.
Wardle, H. (2015b) ‘Ras Dizzy 1932–2008’, in F.W. Knight and H.L. Gates (eds.) Dictionary of Caribbean
and Afro-Latin American Biography, Oxford: Oxford University Press and W.E.B. Dubois Institute.
Wardle, H. (2017a) ‘Cosmopolitics and Common Sense’, in Shaffner, J. and H. Wardle (eds.) Cosmopolitics:
Collected Papers of the Open Anthropology Cooperative, St Andrews: OAC Press.
Wardle, H. (2017b) ‘John Brown: Freedom and Imposture in the Early Twentieth-Century TransCaribbean’,
in M. Lino e Silva and H. Wardle (eds.) Freedom in Practice: Governance, Autonomy and Liberty in the
Everyday, London: Routledge.
Werbner, P. (2008) ‘Cosmopolitanism, Globalisation and Diaspora: Stuart Hall in Conversation with Pnina
Werbner’, in P. Werbner (ed.) Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Berg.
Cosmopolitanism in Asia
Appiah, K.A. (1998) ‘Cosmopolitan Patriots’, in P. Cheah and B. Robbins (eds.) Cosmo Politics, Minneapolis,
MN: University of Minneapolis Press, 91–116.
Appiah, K.A. (2006) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers, New York: W.W. Norton.
Beck, U. , Sznaider, N. and Winter, R. (2000) Global America: The Cultural Consequences of
Americanization, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Bray, D. (2009) ‘Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: A Deweyan Approach to Democracy beyond the Nation-State’,
Millennium, 37(3): 683–719.
Cohen, R. (2004) ‘Chinese Cockle-pickers, the Transnational Turn and Everyday Cosmopolitanism:
Reflections on the New Global Migrants’, Labour, Capital and Society, 37(2): 130 - 149, 134, 138–139.
Dallmayr, F. (1996) Beyond Orientalism: Essays on Cross-Cultural Encounter, New York: State University of
New York Press.
Delanty, G. (2006a) ‘The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory’, Special
Issue on Cosmopolitan Sociology, British Journal of Sociology , 57(1): 25–47.
Delanty, G. (2006b) ‘Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism’, in G. Delanty and K. Kumar (eds.) The Sage
Handbook of Nations and Nationalism, London: Sage, 357–368.
Delanty, G. and He, B. (2008) ‘Cosmopolitan Perspectives on European and Asian Transnationalism’,
International Sociology, 23(3): 323–344.
Dryzek, J.S. (2006) Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World, Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Fung, Yu-lan (1973) A History of Chinese Philosophy Volume 2, Seventh Printing, Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Hannerz, U. (1996) Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places, London: Routledge.
He, B. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy and the National Identity Question in Europe and East Asia’,
International Relations of the East-Pacific, 2: 47–68.
He, B. (2004a) ‘World Citizenship and Transnational Activism’, in N. Piper and A. Uhlin (eds.) Transnational
Activism in Asia, London: Routledge, 78–93.
He, B. (2004b) ‘Transnational Civil Society and the National Identity Question in East Asia’, Global
Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 10(2): 227–246.
He, B. (2004c) ‘East Asian Ideas of Regionalism’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 58(1): 105–125.
He, B. (2008) ‘Normative Regionalism in East Asia’, in M. Timmermann and J. Tsuchiyama (eds.)
Institutionalising Northeast Asia: Regional Steps towards Global Governance, Tokyo: United Nations
University Press, 63–80.
Held, D. (1995) Cosmopolitan Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hiebert, D. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitanism at the Local Level: The Development of Transnational Neighbour-
hoods’, in S. Vertovec and R. Cohen (eds.) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context and Practice,
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 209–226.
Inoguchi, T. , Basanez, M. , Tanaka, A. and Dadabaev, T. (eds.) (2005) Values and Life Styles in Urban
Asia: A Cross-National Analysis Sourcebook Based on the Asian Surveys of 2005, Tokyo: University of
Tokyo.
Kumkum, C. (2009) ‘Cultural Flows and Cosmopolitanism in Mughal India: The Bishnupur Kingdom’, Indian
Economic Social History Review, 46(2): 147–182.
Kymlicka, W. and He, B. (eds.) (2005) Multiculturalism in Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lamont, M. and Aksartova, S. (2002) ‘Ordinary Cosmopolitanisms: Strategies for Bridging Racial Boundaries
among Working-class Men’, Theory, Culture and Society, 19: 1–25.
Lewis, M.L. (2009) China’s Cosmopolitan Empire: The Tang Dynasty, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press.
Manjapra, K. and Bose, S. (2010) Cosmopolitan Thought Zones: South Asia and the Global Circulation of
Ideas, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Molz, J.G. (2006) ‘Cosmopolitan Bodies: Fit to Travel and Travelling to Fit’, Body and Society, 12(3): 1–21.
Narayan, K. (2007) ‘Moving Stories: Beyond the Local in Ethnography and Fiction’, in K. Robinson (ed.)
Asian and Pacific Cosmopolitans: Self and Subject in Motion, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 60–76.
Ong, A. (1999) Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationalism, Durham, NC: Duke University
Press.
Ossewaarde, M. (2007) ‘Cosmopolitanism and the Society of Strangers’, Current Sociology, 55: 367–388.
Pichler, F.P. (2009) ‘Cosmopolitan Europe: Views and Identity’, European Societies, 11(1): 3–26.
Pogge, T. (2008) World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (2nd edn.),
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pollock, S. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan and Vernacular in History’, in C.A. Breckenridge (eds.) Cosmopolitanism,
Durham, NJ: Duke University Press, 15–53.
Robinson, K. (2007) ‘Introduction: Asian and Pacific Cosmopolitans: Self and Subject in Motion’, in K.
Robinson (ed.) Asian and Pacific Cosmopolitans: Self and Subject in Motion, Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan, 1–18.
Rofel, L. (2007) Desiring China: Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture, Durham, NC:
Duke University Press, 111–134.
Rohlen, T.P. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan Cities and Nation States: Open Economics, Urban Dynamics, and
Government in East Asia’, Discussion Papers, Asia/Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, 26–31.
Scwartz, B. (1985) The World of Thought in Ancient China, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
van Hooft, S. (2009) Cosmopolitanism: A Philosophy for Global Ethics, Durham: Acumen Publishers.
Zhao, T. (2005) Tianxia Tixi (Tianxia System), Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Press.
Benedict Anderson’s cosmopolitan leanings and the question of Southeast Asian
subjectivity
Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. ed.,
London: Verso.
Anderson, B. (1998) The Spectre of Comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia and the World, London:
Verso.
Anderson, B. (2005) Under Three Flags: Anarchism and the Anti-Colonial Imagination, London: Verso.
Anderson, B. (2009) ‘Interview with Benedict Anderson’, Cynthia Foo, Invisible Culture: An Electronic Journal
for Visual Culture, 13(Spring): 4–21. https://ivc.lib.rochester.edu/interview-with-benedict-anderson/
Anderson, B. (2012) ‘Colonial Cosmopolitanism’, in Z. Ibrahim (ed.) Social Science and Knowledge in a
Globalising World, Petaling Jaya: Persatuan Sains Sosial Malaysia, Social Science Series.
Anderson, B. (2016) A Life Beyond Boundaries, London: Verso.
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis: Minnesota
University Press.
Arendt, H. (1994) Essays in Understanding 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism, ed. J. Kohn ,
New York: Schocken.
Arendt, H. (2005) The Promise of Politics, ed. J. Kohn , New York: Schocken.
Cheah, P. (2003) Spectral Nationality: Passages of Freedom from Kant to Postcolonial Literatures of
Liberation, New York: Columbia University Press.
Cheah, P. (2006) Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights, Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Cheah, P. and Robbins, B. (eds.) (1998) Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation,
Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Declaration on ASEAN Unity in Cultural Diversity : Towards Strengthening ASEAN Community (2011).
ASEAN declaration, signed in Bali, Indonesia on November 17, 2011.
Derrida, J. (2005) Rogues: Two Essays on Reason, trans. P.-A. Brault and M. Naas , Palo Alto: Stanford
University Press.
Derrida, J. and Dufourmantelle, A. (2000) Of Hospitality, trans. R. Bowlby , Palo Alto: Stanford University
Press.
Factsheet of ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) ASEAN Secretariat, June 2013.
Ferguson, R.J. (1994) ‘Complexity in the Centre: The New Southeast Asian Mandala’, Culture Mandala: The
Bulletin of the Centre for East-West Cultural and Economic Studies, 1(1): 16–40.
Fichte, J.G. (1968) Addresses to the German Nation, ed. G.A. Kelly , trans. R.F. Jones and G.H. Turnbull ,
New York: Harper and Row.
Lenin, V.I. (1951) The Right of Nations to Self-Determination, New York: International Publishers.
Lund, S. (2003) ‘A Mandala for the Southeast Asian International System’, Culture Mandala: The Bulletin of
the Centre for East-West Cultural and Economic Studies, 6(1): 1–12.
Meinecke, F. (1970) Cosmopolitanism and the National State, trans. R.B. Kimber , Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Wolters, O.W. (1999) History, Culture and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives, Ithaca: Southeast Asia
Program Publications.
Unity in diversity
Aravamudan, S. (2007) Guru English, London: Penguin Books.
Athar Ali, M. (2008) ‘The Perception of India in Akbar and Abu’l Fazl’, in Irfan Habid (ed.) Akbar and His
India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–224.
Basham, A.L. (1999) A Cultural History of India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, A. (1991) The Republic of Plato, New York: Basic Books.
Brown, M.C. (1984) ‘Svarāj, the Indian Ideal of Freedom: A Political or Religious Concept?’, Religious
Studies, 20(3): 429–441.
Dalton, D. (ed.) (1996) Mahatma Gandhi: Selected Political Writings, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Delanty, G. (2010) Community, London: Routledge.
Diaz, R.M. (2005) Tirukkural, Chennai: Vardhaman Publishers.
Doniger, W. (1994) The Rig Veda, New Delhi: Penguin Books India.
Erikson, E.H. (1969) Gandhi’s Truth, New York: Norton & Company.
Gandhi, M.K. (2009) The Bhagavad Gita According to Gandhi, ed. J. Stohmeier, Berkeley: North Atlantic
Books.
Goyandka, J. (2000) The Bhagawad Gita, Gorakhpur: Gita Press.
Guha, R. (2008) India after Gandhi, New Delhi: Picador.
Hale, W.E. (1999) Asura in Early Vedic Religions, New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Harvey, M.J. (1986) ‘The Secular as Sacred? – The Religio-Political Rationalization of B.G. Tilak’, Modern
Asian Studies, 20(2): 321–331.
Hijiya, J.A. (2000) ‘The “Gita” of J. Robert Oppenheimer’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society, 144(2): 123–167.
Hiriyanna, M. (1993) Outlines of Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Iyengar, U. (ed.) (2007) The Oxford India Nehru, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Iyer, R. (1990) The Essential Writings of Mahatma Gandhi, Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Jordens, J.T.F. (1999a) ‘Hindu Religious and Social Reform in British India’, in A.L. Basham (ed.) A Cultural
History of India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 365–382.
Jordens, J.T.F. (1999b) ‘Medieval Hindu Devotionalism’, in A.L. Basham (ed.) A Cultural History of India,
New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 266–280.
Khan, I.A. (2008) ‘Akbar’s Personality Traits and World Outlook – A Critical Reappraisal’, in Irfan Habib (ed.)
Akbar and His India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Khandelwal, M.S. (2002) Becoming American, Being Indian: An Immigrant Community in New York City,
New York: Cornell University Press.
Kipling, R.J. (1987) Kim, London: Penguin Classics.
Kleingeld, P. and Brown, P. (2006) ‘Cosmopolitanism’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/.
Kumar, A. (2002) Bombay London New York, New York: Routledge.
Mathur, D.C. (1974) ‘The Concept of Action in the Bhagvad-Gita’, Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research, 35(1): 34–45.
Matilal, B.K. (1986) Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
Mazrui, A. (1978) Political Values and the Educated Class in Africa, London: Heinemann.
McKown, R. (1973) Nkrumah, New York: Doubleday.
Morris, M.M. and Kaunda, K. (eds.) (1980) The Riddle of Violence, San Francisco: Harper & Row Publishers.
Mukhia, H.M. (2010) Exploring India’s Medieval Centuries, Delhi: Aakar Books.
Pandian, M.S.S. (2008) Brahmin & Non-Brahmin, Ranikhet: Permanent Black.
Pollock, S. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitanism and Vernacular in History,’ in Breckenridge, C.A. , Pollock, S. , Bhabha,
H.K. and Chakrabarty, D. (eds.) Cosmopolitanism, Durham: Duke University Press.
Puligandla, R. (1997) Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.
Raghavan, V. (1958) Spiritual Heritage of Tyāgarāja, Madras: Sri Ramakrishna Math.
Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sangharakshita, B. (1999) ‘Buddhism’, in A.L. Basham (ed.) A Cultural History of India, New Delhi: Oxford
University Press, pp. 83–99.
Selvanayagam, I. (1992) ‘Aśoka and Arjuna as Counterfigures Standing on the Field of Dharma: A Historical-
Hermeneutical Perspective’, History of Religions, 32(1): 59–75.
Sen, A.K. (2009) The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Sharma, C. (1987) A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Spivak, G.C. (2002) ‘Resident Alien’, in David Theo Goldberg and Ato Quaegson (eds.) Relocating
Postcolonialism, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 47–65.
Stewart, F. (2002) Horizontal Inequality: A Neglected Dimension of Development, Helsinki: UNU-Wider.
Tagore, R. (2006) Gora, ed. Sujit Mukherjee, New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.
Takaki, R.T. (2002) Debating Diversity: Clashing Perspectives on Race and Ethnicity in America, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Tapasyānanda, S. (1990) Bhakti Schools of Vedānta, Madras: Sri Ramakrishna Math.
Taylor, C. (2004) Modern Social Imaginaries, Durham: Duke University Press.
Thapar, R. (1999) ‘Asokan India and the Guptan Age’, in A.L. Basham (ed.) A Cultural History of India, New
Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 38–50.
Thapar, R. (2002) Early India, New Delhi: Penguin Books.
Tönnies, F. (1963) Community and Society, trans. Charles P. Loomis, New York: Harper & Row.
Upadhye, A.N. (1999) ‘Jainism’, in A.L. Basham (ed.) A Cultural History of India, New Delhi: Oxford
University Press, pp. 100–110.
Valiathan, M.S. (2003) The Legacy of Caraka, Chennai: Orient Longman.
Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society, ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Wheeler, M. (1968) The Indus Civilization, London: Cambridge University Press.
Wiredu, K. (1986) ‘The Question of Violence in Contemporary African Political Thought’, Praxis International,
6(3): 373–381.
Kyōsei
Abe, S. (1995), ‘Seken’ to wa nanika (What is ‘seken?), Tokyo: Kōdansha.
Amano, M. (2011), In Pursuit of Seikatsusha: A Genealogy of the Autonomous Citizen in Japan, Melbourne:
Trans Pacific Press.
Amos, T. (2011), Embodying Difference: The Making of Burakumin in Modern Japan, Honolulu: University of
Hawaii Press.
Anderson, B. (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, New
York: Verso.
Arnason, J. (2002), The Peripheral Centre: Essays on Japanese History and Civilization, Melbourne: Trans
Pacific Press.
Befu, H. (2001), Hegemony of Homogeneity: An Anthropological Analysis of Nihonjinron, Melbourne: Trans
Pacific Press.
Befu, H. (2006), ‘Conditions of Living Together (kyōsei)’, in S. Lee , S. Murphy-Shigemitsu , and H. Befu
(eds), Japan’s Diversity Dilemmas: Ethnicity, Citizenship, and Education, Lincoln: iUniverse.
Burgess, C. (2004), ‘(Re)constructing Identities: International Marriage Migrants as Potential Agents of
Social Change in a Globalising Japan’, Asian Studies Review, 28(3) (September): 223–242.
Denoon, D. , Hudson, M. , McCormack, G. , and Morris-Suzuki, T. (eds) (1996), Multicultural Japan,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fukuoka, Y. (2000), Young Koreans in Japan, Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Imanishi, K. (2002), A Japanese View of Nature: The World of Living Things, London: Routledge.
Inoguchi, T. , Basanez, M. , Tanaka, A. , and Dadabaev, T. (2005), Values and Lifestyles in Urban Asia,
Tokyo: Institute of Oriental Studies, University of Tokyo.
Iwabuchi, K. (2002), Decentering Globalization: Popular Culture and Japanese Transnationalism, Durham:
Duke University Press.
Kawai, K. (ed) (2013), Groups: The Evolution of Human Sociality, Kyoto: Kyoto University Press, and
Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Kawai, K. (ed) (2017), Institutions: The Evolution of Human Sociality, Kyoto: Kyoto University Press, and
Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Kreiner, J. , and Befu, H. (2003), ‘Preface’, in T. Umesao (ed), An Ecological View of History, Melbourne:
Trans Pacific Press, pp. vii–xii.
Kuwayama, T. (2004), Native Anthropology: The Japanese Challenge to Western Academic Hegemony,
Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Lie, J. (2001), Multiethnic Japan, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Machimura, T. (2010), ‘Doing Sociology in Native Languages in a Globalizing World: Thinking about Its
Significance and Difficulty in Japan’, in M. Burawoy , M.K. Chang , and M.F. Hsieh (eds), Facing an Unequal
World: Challenges for a Global Sociology, Vol. 2: Asia (pp. 201–210), Taiwan: Academia Sinica and the
Council of National Associations of the International Sociological Association.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2017), Kaigai zairyū hōjinsuu chōsa tōkei (Annual Report of Statistics on
Japanese Nationals Overseas), as of 1 October 2016, www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000260884.pdf
Mouer, R. and Sugimoto, Y. (1986), Images of Japanese Society: Social Construction of Reality, London:
Kegan Paul International. Reprinted by Routledge in 2013.
Murakami, F. (2005), Postmodern, Feminism and Postcolonial Currents in Contemporary Japan: A Reading
of Murakami Haruki, Yoshimoto Banana, Yoshimoto Takaaki and Kuratani Kojin, London: Routledge.
Murakami, M. (2009), Jin, Vol. 16, Jump Comics Deluxe, Tokyo: Shūeisha.
Nishida, K. (1992), An Inquiry into the Good, reprinted edition, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Oguma, E. (2014), The Boundaries of ‘the Japanese’ – Volume 1: Okinawa 1868–1972, Melbourne: Trans
Pacific Press.
Oguma, E. (2017), The Boundaries of ‘the Japanese’ – Volume 2: Korea, Taiwan and the Ainu 1868–1945,
Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Oguma, E. (2018), ‘Studying Japan as the “Other”: A Short History of Japanese Studies and Its Future’, in K.
Okano and Y. Sugimoto (eds), Rethinking Japanese Studies: Eurocentrism and the Asia-Pacific Region,
London: Routledge, pp. 19–31.
Ohmae, K. (1999), The Borderless World, revised edition, New York: HarperCollins.
Ohtsuki, S. (2013), ‘Coexistent Society in Japan’, in S. Tanabe (ed), Japanese Perceptions of Foreigners,
Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press, pp. 42–55.
Sato, M. (2001), Farewell to Nippon: Japanese Lifestyle Migrants in Australia, Melbourne: Trans Pacific
Press.
Sugimoto, Y. (1999), ‘Making Sense of Nihonjinron’, Thesis Eleven, 57(May): 81–96.
Sugimoto, Y. (2014), An Introduction to Japanese Society, fourth edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Sugimoto, Y. (2018), ‘Turning towards a Cosmopolitan Japanese Studies’, in K. Okano and Y. Sugimoto
(eds), Rethinking Japanese Studies and the Asia-Pacific Region, London: Routledge, pp. 167–183.
Takano, Y. and Osaka, E. (1999), ‘An Unsupported Common View: Comparing Japan and the U.S. on
Individualism/Collectivism’, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2: 311–341.
Takano, Y. and Sogon, S. (2008), ‘Are Japanese More Collectivistic Than Americans?: Examining
Conformity in In-groups and the Reference-group Effect’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39:
237–250.
Takata, Y. (1989), Principles of Sociology, Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Takata, Y. (1995), Power Theory of Economics, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Tanabe, S. (2012), ‘What Does It Mean to Be a “Japanese”?’, in K. Minamida and I. Tsuji (eds), Pop Culture
and the Everyday in Japan, Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press, pp. 260–281.
Tanabe, S. (2013), ‘Nationalism: Its Multiplicity and Diversity’, in S. Tanabe (ed), Japanese Perceptions of
Foreigners, Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press, pp. 11–26.
Uchida, T. (2009), Nihon henkyōron (Japan periphery thesis), Tokyo: Shinchōsha.
Umesao, T. (2003), An Ecological View of History: Japanese Civilization in the World Context, Melbourne:
Trans Pacific Press.
UNESCO (2016), Index Translationum, www.unesco.org/xtrans/bsstatlist.aspx?lg=0
Yanagita, K. and Sasaki, K. (2015), Folk Legends from Tono: Japan’s Spirits, Deities, and Phantastic
Creatures, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Yoshimoto, T. (1968), Kyōdō gensō-ron (On Imagined Communities), Tokyo: Kawade Shobō Shinsha.
Cosmopolitan Europe
Andrijasevic, R. (2006) ‘Lampedusa in Focus: Migrants Caught between the Libyan Desert and the Deep
Sea’, Feminist Review, 82: 120–125.
Appadurai, A. (2006) Fear of Small Numbers: An Essay on the Geography of Anger, Durham, NC: Duke
University Press.
Baban, F. (2013)‘Cosmopolitan Europe: Border Crossings and Transnationalism in Europe’, Global Society,
27(2): 217–235.
Baban, F. (2016) ‘Cosmopolitanism from the Margins. Redefining the Idea of Europe Through
Postcoloniality’, in S. Ponzanesi and G. Colpani (eds.) Postcolonial Transitions in Europe: Context, Practices
and Politics, London: Rowman and Littlefield International, pp. 371–390.
Baban, F. and Keyman, F. (2008) ‘Turkey and Postnational Europe: Challenges for the Cosmopolitan
Political Community’, European Journal of Social Theory, 11(1): 107–124.
Balibar, É. (1998) ‘The Borders of Europe’, in P. Cheah and B. Robbins (eds.) Cosmopolitics: Thinking and
Feeling beyond the Nation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 216–229.
Balibar, É. (2003a) ‘Europe, an “Imagined” Frontier of Democracy’, Diacritics, 33(3/4): 36–44.
Balibar, É. (2003b) We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship, Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Balibar, É. (2010) ‘Europe Is a Dead Political Project’, The Guardian, Tuesday 25 May 2010.
www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/may/25/eu-crisis-catastrophicconsequences
Balibar, É. (2016) ‘Europe at the Limits’, Interventions, 18(2): 165–171.
Bauman, Z. (2004) Europe: An Unfinished Adventure, Cambridge: Polity.
Bauman, Z. (2012) ‘Times of Interregnum’, Ethics & Global Politics, 5(1): 49–56.
Bauman, Z. (2016) Strangers at Our Door, Cambridge: Polity.
Bauman, Z. (2018) ‘Between Separation and Integration: Strategies of Cohabitation in the Era of
Diasporization and Internet’, Popular Communication, 16(1).
Beck, U. (2000) ‘The Cosmopolitan Perspective. Sociology and the Second Age of Modernity’, British
Journal of Sociology, 51(1): 79–105.
Beck, U. (2002) ‘The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies’, Theory, Culture and Society, 19(1–2): 17–44.
Beck, U. (2010) ‘The Cosmopolitan Manifesto’, in G. Wallace Brown and D. Held (eds.) The Cosmopolitan
Reader, Oxford: Polity, pp. 217–228.
Beck, U. and Grande, E. (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bhabha, H. (2000) ‘The Vernacular Cosmopolitan’, in F. Dennis and N. Khan (eds.) Voices of the Crossing:
The impact of Britain on Writers from Asia, the Caribbean, and Africa, London: Serpent’s Tail.
Bhambra, G.K. (2009) ‘Postcolonial Europe: Or, Understanding Europe in Times of the Postcolonial’, in C.
Rumford (ed.) Handbook of European Studies, London: Sage, pp. 69–85.
Bhambra, G.K. (2011) ‘Cosmopolitanism and Postcolonial Critique’, in M. Rovisco and M. Nowicka (eds.)
The Ashgate Research Companion to Cosmopolitanism, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 313–328.
Bhambra, G.K. (2016) ‘Wither Europe’, Interventions, 18(2): 187–202.
Biebuyck, W. and Rumford, C. (2012) ‘Many Europes: Rethinking Multiplicity’, European Journal of Social
Theory, 15(3): 3–20.
Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Chambers, I. (2008) Mediterranean Crossings: The Politics of an Interrupted Modernity, Durham and
London: Duke University Press.
Clifford, J. (1992) ‘Traveling Cultures’, in L. Grossberg , C. Nelson and P. Treichler (eds.) Cultural Studies,
New York: Routledge, pp. 96–116.
Clifford, J. (1998) ‘Mixed Feelings’, in P. Cheah and B. Robbins (eds.) Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling
beyond the Nation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 362–370.
Conrad, S. (2012) German Colonialism: A Short History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dainotto, R.M. (2007) Europe (in Theory), Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Delanty, G. (2005) ‘The Idea of Cosmopolitan Europe. On the Cultural Significance of Europeanization’,
International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 15(3): 405–421.
de Medeiros, P. (2011) ‘A Failure of the Imagination? Questions for a Post-Imperial Europe’, Moving World,
11(2): 91–101.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2002) Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
European Union (2013) ‘Dublin Regulation’ (EU) No 604/2013. of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 26 June 2013.
Gewald, J. (1999) Herero Heroes: A Socio-Political History of the Herero of Namibia, 1890–1923, Athens:
Ohio University Press.
Gilroy, P. (2004) After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? London: Routledge.
Gramsci, A. (1929–1935) 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited and translated by Q. Hoare
and G. Nowell Smith, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Habermas, J. (2003) ‘Making Sense of the EU: Toward a Cosmopolitan Europe’, Journal of Democracy,
14(4): 86–100.
Habermas, J. (2009) Europe: The Faltering Project, Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. and Derrida, J. (2003) ‘February 15, or What Binds Europeans Together: A Plea for a
Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe’, Constellations, 10(3): 291–297.
Hall, S. (1992) ‘The Question of Cultural Identity’, in S. Hall , D. Held and T. McGrew (eds.) Modernity and Its
Futures: Understanding Modern Societies Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, pp. 273–326.
Hall, S. (2003) ‘“In But Not of Europe”: Europe and Its Myths’, in L. Passerini (ed.) Figures d’Europe: Images
and Myths of Europe, Brussels: Peter Lang, pp. 345–346.
Hansen, P. (2002) ‘European Integration, European Identity and the Colonial Connection’, European Journal
of Social Theory, 5(4): 483–498.
Hansen, P. (2004) ‘In the Name of Europe’, Race and Class, 45(3): 49–62.
Hansen, P. and Jonsson, S. (2014) Eurofrica: The Untold History of European Integration and Colonialism,
London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Horta, P.L. and Robbins, B. (2017) Cosmopolitanisms, New York: New York University Press.
Huggan, G. (2008) ‘Perspectives on Postcolonial Europe’, Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 44(3): 241–249.
Huggan, G. (2011) ‘Editorial’, Moving World. A Journal of Transcultural Writing. Special issue on Postcolonial
Europe, 11(2): 1–6.
Kant, I. (1999) ‘Toward Perpetual Peace’, in Practical Philosophy: Cambridge Edition of the Works of
Immanuel Kant, translated by M.J. Gregor , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–352.
Leurs, K. and Ponzanesi, S. (2018) ‘Connected Migrants: Encapsulation and Cosmopolitanization’, Popular
Communication, 16(1), pp. 4–20.
Magone, J (2009) ‘Europe and global governance’, in: C. Rumford (ed.) The Sage Handbook of European
Studies, London: Sage, pp. 277–294.
Mbembe, A. (2016) ‘Decolonizing the University: New Directions’, Arts & Humanities in Higher Education,
15(1): 29–45.
Mezzadra, S. and Neilson, B. (2013) Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor, Durham and London:
Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W. (2000). ‘The Many Faces of Cosmo-Polis: Border Thinking and Critical Cosmopolitanism’, Public
Culture, 12(3): 721–748.
Nussbaum, M. (2010) ‘Kant and Cosmopolitanism’, in G. Wallace Brown and D. Held (eds.) The
Cosmopolitanism Reader, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 27–44.
Parry, B. (1991) ‘The Contradictions of Cultural Studies’, Transition, 53: 37–45.
Pollock, S. , Bhabha, H.K. , Breckenridge, C.A. , Chakrabarty, D. (eds.) (2000) ‘Cosmopolitanisms’, Public
Culture, 12(3): 577–589.
Ponzanesi, S. (2011) ‘In the Name of Europe’, Social Identities. Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and
Culture, 17(1): 1–10.
Ponzanesi, S. (2016) ‘The point of Europe: Postcolonial Entanglements’, Interventions, 8(2): 159–164.
Robbins, B. (1998) ‘Comparative Cosmopolitanisms’, in P. Cheah and B. Robbins (eds.) Cosmopolitics:
Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 246–264.
Said, E.W. (1984) ‘Travelling Theory’, in E. Said (ed.) The World, the Text, and the Critic, Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, pp. 226–247.
Spivak, G.C. (1999) A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present, Harvard:
Harvard University Press.
Wa Thiong’o, N. (1986) Decolonizing the Mind: The politics of Language in African Literature, London:
James Currey, Nairobi: Heinemann Kenya, New Hampshire: Heinemann.
Afropolitanism and the end of Black nationalism
Abani, C. (2010) ‘Lagos: A Pilgrimage in Notations’, in N. Edjabe and E. Pieterse (eds.), African Cities
Reader: Pan African Practices, Cape Town: Chimurenga.
Afolayan, A. (2017) ‘African Philosophy, Afropolitanism, and Africa’, in T. Falola and A. Afolayan (eds.),
Palgrave Handbook of African Philosophy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Akyeampong, E. (2000) ‘Africans in the Diaspora: The Diaspora and Africa’, African Affairs, 99: 183–215.
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at Large, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Appadurai, A. (2014) ‘Cosmopolitanism from Below: Some Ethical Lessons from the Slums of Mumbai’,
Johannesburg Salon, 4: 32–44.
Appiah, K.A. (1992) In My Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture, Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Appiah, K.A. (1997) ‘Cosmopolitan Patriots’, Critical Inquiry, 23(3): 617–639.
Appiah, K.A. (2006) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers, New York: W.W. Norton.
Awondo, P. (2014) ‘L’Afropolitanisme en Débat’, Politique africaine, 136(4): 105–119.
Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination, C. Emerson and M. Holquist (trans.), Austin: University of
Texas Press.
Balakrishnan, S. (2017) ‘The Afropolitan Idea: New Perspectives on Cosmopolitanism in African Studies’,
History Compass, 15(2).
Bayart, J.F. , Ellis, S. and Hibou, B. (eds.) (1999) The Criminalization of the State in Africa, Bloomington:
Indiana University Press.
Bosch Santana, S. (2016) ‘Exorcizing the Future: Afropolitanism’s Spectral Origins’, Journal of African
Cultural Studies, 28(1): 120–126.
Chandler, N. (2013) Toward an African Future at the Limit of World, London: Living Commons Collective.
Chatterjee, P. (2004) Politics of the Governed, New York: Columbia University Press.
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. (2002) ‘Alien Nation: Zombies, Immigrants and Millennial Capitalism’, South
Atlantic Quarterly, 101(4): 779–805.
De Boeck, F. and Simone, A. (2010) ‘Urbanism beyond Architecture: African Cities as Infrastructre’, in N.
Edjabe and E. Pieterse (eds.), African Cities Reader: Pan African Practices, Cape Town: Chimurenga.
Diawara, M. (2009) In Search of Africa, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ede, A. (2016) ‘The Politics of Afropolitanism’, Journal of African Cultural Studies, 28(1): 88–100.
Edwards, B.H. (2001) ‘The Uses of Diaspora’, Social Text, 66(19): 45–73.
Eze, C. (2014) ‘Rethinking African Culture and Identity: The Afropolitan Model’, Journal of African Cultural
Studies, 26(2): 234–247.
Fanon, F. (1963) The Wretched of the Earth, C. Farrington (trans.), New York: Grove Press.
Gehrmann, S. (2016) ‘Cosmopolitanism with African Roots: Afropolitanism’s Ambivalent Mobilities’, Journal
of African Cultural Studies, 28(1): 61–72.
Geschiere, P. (1997) The Modernity of Witchcraft, Charleston: University of Virginia Press.
Gevisser, M. and Nuttall, S. (2004) ‘From the Ruins: The Constitution Hill Project’, Public Culture, 16(3):
507–519.
Gikandi, S. (2011) ‘On Afropolitanism’, in J. Wawrzinek and J. Makokha (eds.), Negotiating Afropolitanism,
Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Gilroy, P. (1993) The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness, Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
Gilroy, P. (2000) ‘The Tyrannies of Unanimism’, in Against Race: Imagining Political Culture beyond the
Colour Line, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gilroy, P. (2005) ‘A New Cosmopolitanism’, Interventions, 7(3): 287–292.
Hall, S. (2006) ‘Cosmopolitan Promises, Multicultural Realities’, in R. Scholar (ed.), Divided Cities, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Hartman, S. (2007) Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route, New York: Farrar, Straus
and Giroux.
Herskovits, M. (1941) The Myth of the Negro Past, Boston: Beacon Press.
Hoad, N. (2007) African Intimacies: Race, Homosexuality and Globalization, Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Houtondji, P. (1976) Sur la “Philosophie Africaine”: Critique de l’ethnophilosophie, Paris: Maspero.
Jamal, A. (2010) ‘Terror and the City’, in N. Edjabe and E. Pieterse (eds.), African Cities Reader: Pan African
Practices, Cape Town: Chimurenga.
Kelley, R.D.G. (2002) Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination, Boston: Beacon Press.
Landau, L. and Freemantle, I. (2010) ‘Tactical Cosmopolitanism and Idioms of Belonging: Insertion and Self-
Exclusion in Johannesburg’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(3): 375–390.
Mafeje, A. (1971) ‘The Ideology of Tribalism’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 9(2): 253–261.
Malaquais, D. (2011) ‘Anti-Teleology: Re-Mapping the Imag(in)ed City’, in N. Edjabe and E. Pieterse (eds.),
African Cities Reader II: Mobilities and Fixture, Cape Town: Chimurenga.
Mamdani, M. (1996) Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism,
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Masolo, D.A. (1994) African Philosophy in Search of Identity, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Matory, J.L. (2005) Black Atlantic Religion, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mbembe, A. (1992) ‘The Banality of Power and the Aesthetics of Vulgarity in the Postcolony’, Public Culture,
4(2): 1–30.
Mbembe, A. (2001) On the Postcolony, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mbembe, A. (2002) ‘African Modes of Self-Writing’, Public Culture, 14(1): 239–273.
Mbembe, A. (2007) ‘Afropolitanism’, in S. Njami and L. Durán (eds), Africa Remix, Johannesburg: Jacana
Media.
Mbembe, A. and Balakrishnan, S. (2016) ‘Pan-African Legacies, Afropolitan Futures’, Transition, 120(1):
28–37.
Mbembe, A. and Nuttall, S. (2004) ‘Writing the World from an African Metropolis’, Public Culture, 16(3):
347–372.
Moses, W.J. (1998) Afrotopia: The Roots of African American Popular History, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. (2009) ‘Africa for Africans or Africa for “Natives” Only? New Nationalisms and Nativisms
in Zimbabwe and South Africa’, Africa Spectrum, 44(1): 61–78.
Nuttall, S. (2004) ‘City Forms and Writing the “Now” in South Africa’, Journal of Southern African Studies,
30(4): 731–748.
Nuttall, S. and Mbembe, A. (2008) Johannesburg: The Elusive Metropolis, Durham: Duke University Press.
Patterson, O. (1982) Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pierre, J. (2012) The Predicament of Blackness: Postcolonial Ghana and the Politics of Race, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Piot, C. (2010) Nostalgia for the Future, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Price, M. (2008) ‘Installation Address’, Speech at University of Cape Town, August 19.
Salmon, G. and Charbonnier, P. (2014) ‘The Two Ontological Pluralisms of French Anthropology’, Journal of
the Royal Anthropological Institute, 20(3): 567–573.
Sartre, J.-P. (1948) ‘Orphée Noir’, in L. Senghor (ed.), Anthologie de la Nouvelle Poésie Nègre et Malagache
de la Langue Français, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Selasi, T. (2005) ‘Bye-Bye Babar’, The LIP. http://thelip.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=76
Shaw, R. (2002) Memories of the Slave Trade: Ritual and Historical Imagination in Sierra Leone, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Sichone, O. (2008) ‘Xenophobia and Xenophilia in South Africa: African Migrants in Cape Town’, P. Werbner
(ed.), Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism, Oxford and New York: Berg.
Simbao, R. (2008) ‘Afri Thing Is Not What It Seems’, Art South Africa, 7(1): 58–63.
Sterling, C. (2015) ‘Race Matters: Cosmopolitanism, Afropolitanism, and Pan-Africanism via Edward Wilmot
Blyden’, Journal of Pan-African Studies, 8(1): 119–145.
Towa, M. (1971) Essai sur la problématique philosophie dans l’Afrique actuelle, Yaoundé: Editions CLE.
Wilder, G. (2014) Freedom Time: Négritude, Decolonization, and the Future of the World, Durham: Duke
University Press.
Wiredu, K. (1996) Cultural Universals and Particulars: An African Perspective, Bloomington: Indiana
University Press.
Zeleza, P. (2005) ‘Rewriting the African Diaspora: Beyond the Black Atlantic’, African Affairs, 104(414):
35–68.
Jews and cosmopolitanism from the early modern age to the global era
1
Ablovatski, E. (2010) ‘The 1919 Central European Revolutions and the Judeo-Bolshevik Myth’, European
Review of History, 17(3): 473–489.
Anidjar, G. (2008) Semites: Race, Religion, Literature, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bauer, E. (2010) ‘Jan Gottlieb Bloch: Polish Cosmopolitism versus Jewish Universalism’, European Review
of History, 17(3): 415–429.
Benhabib, S. (2013) ‘Human Dignity and Popular Sovereignty in the Mirror of Political Modernity: Some
Trends in the German-Jewish Experience’, Social Research: An International Quarterly, 80(1): 233–292.
Book of Esther: Tanakh: The Holy Scriptures (2001) Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America.
Carsten, F.L. (1958) ‘The Court Jews. A Prelude to Emancipation’, Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook, 3:
140–156.
Cesarani, D. (ed.) (2002) Port Jews: Jewish Communities in Cosmopolitan Maritime Trading Centres,
1550–1950, Portland: Frank Cass Publishers.
Davis, N.Z. (1984) The Return of Martin Guerre, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eliav-Feldon, M. (1999) ‘Invented Identities: Credulity in the Age of Prophecy and Exploration’, Journal of
Early Modern History, 3(3): 203–232.
Fine, R.D. (2016) ‘Cosmopolitanism and the Critique of Antisemitism: Two Faces of Universality’, European
Review of History, 23(5–6): 769–783.
Gelbin, C.S. (2016) ‘Rootless Cosmopolitans: German-Jewish Writers Confront Stalinist and National
Socialist Atrocities’, European Review of History, 23(5–6): 863–879.
Gelbin, C.S. and Gilman, S. (2017) Cosmopolitanism and the Jews, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Giladi, R. (2015) ‘Not Our Salvation: Israel, the Genocide Convention, and the World Court 1950–1951’,
Diplomacy & Statecraft, 26(3): 473–493.
Gilman, S.L. (2016) ‘Aliens vs. Predators: Cosmopolitan Jews vs. Jewish Nomads’, European Review of
History, 23(5–6): 784–796.
Gitelman, Z. (2001) A Century of Ambivalence: The Jews of Russia and the Soviet Union, 1881 to the
Present, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Goldin, S. (2010) ‘Jews as Cosmopolitans, Foreigners, Revolutionaries: Three Images of the Jew in Polish
and Russian Nationalist Ideology at the End of the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries’, European
Review of History, 17(3): 431–444.
Gordon, A. (2017) Towards Nationalisms End: An Intellectual Biography of Hans Kohn, Waltham, MA:
Brandeis University Press.
Gross, J.T. (2006) Fear: Antisemitism in Poland after Auschwitz, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Grüner, F. (2010) ‘“Russia’s Battle against the Foreign”: The Anti-Cosmopolitanism Paradigm in Russian and
Soviet Ideology’, European Review of History, 17(3): 445–472.
Hacohen, M.H. (2009) ‘“The Strange Fact That the State of Israel Exists”: The Cold War Liberals between
Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism’, Jewish Social Studies, 15(2): 37–81.
Hasan-Rokem, G. and Dundes, A. (eds.) (1986) The Wandering Jew: Essays in the Interpretation of a
Christian Legend, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Herzl, T. (2000) Old New Land, translated by Lotta Levensohn , Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers.
Hirsch, S.R. (1990) ‘Religion Allied with Progress’ (1854), in Collected Writings of Samson Raphael Hirsch,
vol. 1, New York: Feldheim.
Hitler, A. (1943) Mein Kampf, translated by Ralph Mannheim , Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kaplan, Y. (2000) An Alternative Path to Modernity: The Sephardi Diaspora in Western Europe, Leiden: Brill.
Katz, J. (1973) Out of the Ghetto: The Social Background of Jewish Emancipation, 1770–1870, New York:
Schocken Books.
Kichelewski, A. (2010) ‘Imagining “the Jews” in Stalinist Poland: Nationalists or Cosmpolities?” European
Review of History, 17(3): 505–522.
Lazaroms, I. (2016) ‘Hotel Patriots or Permanent Strangers? Joseph Roth and the Jews of Inter-War Central
Europe’, European Review of History, 23(5–6): 814–827.
Loeffler, J. (2017) ‘Becoming Cleopatra: The Forgotten Zionism of Raphael Lemkin’, Journal of Genocide
Research, 19(3): 340–360.
Maciejko, P. (2010) ‘Sabbatian Charlatans: The First Jewish Cosmopolitans’, European Review of History,
17(3): 361–378.
Maciejko, P. (2011) The Mixed Multitude: Jacob Frank and the Frankist Movement, 1755–1816,
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Marr, W. (1891) ‘The Testament of an Anti-Semite’, in Wilhelm Marr: The Patriarch of Anti-Semitism, edited
by Moshe Zimmermann , New York: Oxford University Press.
Marx, K. (1978 [1843]) ‘On the Jewish Question’, in Marx-Engels Reader, edited by R. Tucker , New York:
W.W. Norton, pp. 26–46.
Mendelsohn, E. (2003) ‘Jewish Universalims: Some Visual Texts and Subtexts’, in Key Texts in American
Jewish Culture, edited by Jack Kugelmass , New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 163–184.
Mendelssohn, M. (1983 [1783]) Jerusalem, or On Religious Power and Judaism, translated by Alan Arkush ,
Hanover: University Press of New England.
Mendes-Flohr, P. and Reinharz, J. (eds.) (1995) The Jew in the Modern World: A Documentary History, New
York: Oxford University Press.
Meyer, M.A. (1972) The Origins of the Modern Jew: Jewish Identity and Europe, Detroit: Wayne State
University Press.
Miller, M.L. (2010) ‘From Liberal Nationalism to Cosmopolitan Patriotism: Simon Deutsch and 1848ers in
Exile’, European Review of History, 17(3): 379–393.
Miller, M.L. and Ury, S. (2010) ‘Cosmopolitanism: The End of Jewishness?’, European Review of History,
17(3): 337–359.
Moyn, S. (2012) The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Porter, B. (2002) When Nationalism Began to Hate: Imagining Modern Politics in Nineteenth-Century Poland,
New York: Oxford University Press.
Protocolle der erster Rabbinier-Versammlung… (1844) Braunschweig, in Mendes-Flohr, P. and Reinharz, J.
(eds.) (1995) The Jew in the Modern World.
Protocolle und Aktenstücke der weiten Rabbiner-Versammlung (1845) Frankfurt am Main, in Mendes-Flohr,
P. and Reinharz, J. (eds.) (1995) The Jew in the Modern World.
Radice, M. (2015) ‘Micro-Cosmopolitanisms at the Urban Scale’, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and
Power, 22(5): 588–602.
Ruderman, D. (2010) Early Modern Jewry: A New Cultural History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sands, P. (2016) East West Street: On the Origins of ‘Genocide’ and ‘Crimes Against Humanity’, New York:
Vintage Books.
Scholem, G. (1976) On Jews and Judaism in Crisis, New York: Schocken Books.
Shore, M. (2006) Caviar and Ashes: A Warsaw Generation’s Life and Death in Marxism, 1918–1968, New
Haven: Yale University Press.
Simmel, G. (1964) ‘The Stranger’, in The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited and translated by Kurt H. Wolff ,
New York and London: Free Press, pp. 402–408.
Slezkine, Y. (2004) The Jewish Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sorkin, D. (1999) ‘The Port Jew: Notes toward a Social Type’, Journal of Jewish Studies, 50(1): 87–97.
Spencer, P. (2016) ‘Marxism, Cosmopolitanism and “the” Jews’, European Review of History, 23(5–6):
828–846.
Stanislawski, M.F. (2001) Zionism and the Fin-de-Siècle: Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism from Nordau to
Jabotinsky, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sternhell, Z. (1998) The Founding Myths of Israel: Nationalism, Socialism and the Making of the Jewish
State, translated by David Maisel , Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sutherland, C. (2016) ‘Inviting Essential Outsiders: Imagining a Cosmopolitan Nation’, European Review of
History, 23(5–6): 880–896.
Swetschinski, D.M. (2000) Reluctant Cosmopolitans: The Portuguese Jews of Seventeenth-Century
Amsterdam, Oxford: The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
Sznaider, N. (2007) ‘Hannah Arendt’s Jewish Cosmopolitanism: Between the Universal and the Particular’,
European Journal of Social Theory, 10(1): 113–123.
Tacitus, C. (1894) The History of Tacitus, translated by Alfred John Church and William Jackson Brodribb ,
London and New York: Macmillan.
Tama, D. (1807) Transactions of the Parisian Sanhedrin, London.
Trivellato, F. (2009) The Familiarity of Strangers: The Sephardic Diaspora, Livorno, and Cross-Cultural
Trade in the Early Modern Period, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Tuwim, J. (1984) ‘The Memorial and the Grave’, in My Żydzi Polscy…, Jerusalem: Magnes Press, pp. 46–47.
Ury, S. (2012) Barricades and Banners: The Revolution of 1905 and the Transformation of Warsaw Jewry,
Stanford: Stanford University Press.
von Treitschke, H. (1879) ‘A Word about Our Jews’, in Antisemitism in the Modern World: An Anthology of
Texts, edited by Richard S. Levy , Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1991.
Weiner, A. (1999) ‘Nature, Nurture and Memory in a Socialist Utopia: Delineating the Soviet Socio-Ethnic
Body in the Age of Socialism’, American Historical Review, 104(4): 1114–1155.
Werbner, P. (2015) ‘The Dialectics of Urban Cosmopolitanism: Between Tolerance and Intolerance in Cities
of Strangers’, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 22(5): 569–587.
Zimmermann, M. (1987) Wilhelm Marr: The Patriarch of Anti-Semitism, New York: Oxford University Press.