Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Feminism and Female Sexuality
Feminism and Female Sexuality
Feminism and Female Sexuality
Postfeminism in Context
Women, Australian Popular Culture, and the Unsettling of Postfeminism
Margaret Henderson and Anthea Taylor
Postfeminism in Context
Women, Australian Popular
Culture, and the Unsettling of
Postfeminism
Acknowledgementsvi
Index232
Acknowledgements
An Australian postfeminism?
In historical terms, we argue that postfeminism becomes a recognisable
phenomenon in Australia in the mid- to late-1990s, and reaches its zenith
in the first two decades of the twenty-first century; as a consequence, we
will cover texts produced in the period from 1996 to 2018. As the first
generation of women to have benefited from the reforms of the second
wave women’s movement in Australia reached their 20’s and 30’s, and in a
time when the second wave had largely dissipated and/or been reduced to
pop culture stereotypes, the 1990s marked a period where the tensions and
contradictions of living after the second wave of feminism became appar-
ent. We chose 1996 as a starting date for our study because of the com-
plementary symbolism of two events that occurred in Australia that year:
the publication of Kathy Bail’s essay collection, DIY Feminism, a response
to the media event precipitated by the publication of Helen Garner’s The
First Stone (1995), and the election of the socially conservative but eco-
nomically neoliberal Liberal-National Party coalition government led by
John Howard (Sharpe & Boucher 2007, pp. 24–25).5 Bail’s collection
heralds a new and controversial form of (white, middle-class) Australian
feminism, a putative version of third wave feminism – individualistic,
lifestyle- and youth-oriented, and non-threatening. We contend, however,
that DIY Feminism, in the sense of self-identifying as being after the second
wave (1996, p. 4; Kaplan 1996, p. 35, dates this as the 1980s), also consti-
tutes one of the earliest and most detailed versions of Australian postfemi-
nism (Henderson 2006; Taylor 2008).
We are well aware of the problems with the waves model of feminism –
with its sense of linear progress and generationalism, neat temporal and
ideological distinctions, and maternal tropes and metaphors (Roof 1997;
Henry 2004; Taylor 2009; Nicholson 2010; Eichhorn 2013). However, we
concur with Linda Nicholson (2010) who posits that:
there is one use that the wave metaphor is suited for – to identify those
moments in history when issues of gender mobilize large numbers of
people in very public, noisy, and challenging ways, that is, when such
issues are able to generate large scale social or political movements.
We are not in that kind of period, which makes the description of fem-
inist activism today as a ‘third wave’ even more questionable.
Harvey dates the emergence of neoliberalism in the West from the early
1970s as a response to the crisis in capital accumulation. Michael Pusey
(2003) argues that Australia’s neoliberal turn becomes pronounced in the
1980s, although the ALP (Australian Labor Party) government moderated
its impact. The Howard Government (1996–2007), however, implemented
a much more ambitious neoliberal agenda. Mark Western et al. extends
Harvey’s definition by emphasising the centrality and permeation of the
market to neoliberalism. That is, neoliberalism is ‘concerned with providing
the institutional conditions for markets to operate even in arenas where they
did not do so previously’, which they insightfully argue is actually a form of
‘state-sponsored nation building’ (Western et al. 2007, p. 404), transform-
ing health, education, work, trade, welfare, the financial sector, the state’s
role as agent of social justice, environmental protection, and so on.8
Introduction 9
As Michel Feher observes, however, neoliberalism also has a subjective
dimension, requiring a person to conceive of the self as human capital, so
that every existential project or form of conduct is governed by the quest
to appreciate (or at least, avoid depreciating) this capital (2009, p. 21). In
neoliberalism, the social and the subjective domains coalesce. It is there-
fore a discursive and political climate in which feminist demands are con-
strained and/or no longer seen as necessary, thereby absolving the state of
responsibility for addressing women’s inequality (Summers 2003).
Instead, women, with a nod to feminism’s desire for their independence,
are expected to be ‘the autonomous, choosing free self’ – indeed, ‘the indi-
vidual as entrepreneur of the self’ that Nikolas Rose identifies as required
by neoliberalism’s ‘enterprise culture’ (1996, pp. 150–151, 158), and is
what we see played out in our beauty vlogs and self-help books, for
instance. Yet, as Jemima Repo warns, given its distancing from any state-
based response to gendered inequalities and emphasis on self-responsibi-
lisation, ‘No regulatory context is perhaps more pertinent – or
threatening – for feminist struggles today than that of neoliberalism’ (in
Varney 2016, p. 28).
Historically, however, Australia has been seen as an innovator in terms
of ‘women’s policy machinery’, with leftist Prime Minister Gough Whitlam
appointing a women’s adviser (the first in the world), Elizabeth Reid, in
1973 to help ensure all policy and legislative submissions adequately
accounted for their gender implications (Rimmer & Sawer 2016, p. 745).
Such ‘femocrats’ – or ‘inside agitators’, as they have been dubbed
(Eisenstein 1996) – are said to have played a pivotal role in the advance-
ment of women in Australia, and also speak to, and of, a specific national
variety of feminism (Watson 1990). As Hester Eisenstein notes, ‘Australian
feminists appear to me to operate on the basis of a socialist-feminist praxis
linked to the politics of the welfare state’, leading to an overwhelming
focus on women’s economic rights (1996, p. 88). From the 1990s, though,
in terms of these active feminist interventions into the state, progress is
said to have stalled and women’s policy sidelined (Rimmer & Sawer 2016,
p. 745).
Under the Howard Government, the rhetoric shifted and the idea that
gender no longer needed to be factored into any legislative or policy initi-
atives came to be publicly articulated, including by the Prime Minister. In
1997, the Office of the Status of Women was downgraded, and its head,
Pru Goward, remarked: ‘we are finally seeing the left-wing domination of
the women’s movement weakened … People are sick of the thought-police’
(in Dux & Simic 2008, p. 18). In such an environment, as Monica Dux
and Zora Simic argue, the femocrat ‘had all but died’ (2008, p. 18) –
although at a state level, her fortunes varied, depending on the government
of the time. The reason for this retreat from what Marilyn Lake (1999,
p. 253) calls ‘a state feminism’ was explained by Prime Minister John
Howard: Australia had ‘entered the postfeminist phase of the debate’ (‘The
10 Introduction
Mother’s Club’, 2002). We take this up further in our final chapter, though
we argue that it was more a case that we had entered the neoliberal phase
of the state’s dealing with women’s inequality.
Postfeminism is commonly seen as an orchestrated attempt to manage,
or indeed mitigate, the wider social and political transformations that fem-
inism seeks to effect; that is, as a way to tame feminism, to accept aspects
of it that accord with patriarchal capitalism (women as workers, women
as conspicuous consumers, women as sexual subjects, and so on), while
denying any need for structural reform or collective action. The Do-It-
Yourself impetus found in Bail’s collection (1996) as well as in much
1990s advertising – what Anna Cronin (2003) calls its ‘compulsory indi-
vidualism’ – represents one point where postfeminism and neoliberalism
come to most obviously intersect. Postfeminism, as Gill argues, can reso-
nate powerfully with neoliberalism: ‘the autonomous, calculating, self-
regulating subject of neoliberalism bears a strong resemblance to the
active, free-choosing, self-inventing subject of post-feminism’ (2007a,
p. 164). Postfeminism, therefore, is neoliberalism gendered in feminine
terms (Taylor 2012, p. 15), enabling the latter to be articulated via feminist-
inspired discourses of autonomy, freedom, and choice for women, and in
the appealing ‘soft power’ that is popular culture.
Furthermore, as a number of accounts argue (Harris 2004; Scharff
2012; Budgeon 2013; Fraser 2013), women (and girls) form some of the
most contested and hence valuable terrain for the neoliberal project: to
remake women is to make a core part of neoliberalism happen. Neo-
liberalism, therefore, is the second temporal marker of our study because,
if second wave feminism predates postfeminism, neoliberalism is contem-
poraneous with it. Accordingly, in this study we will extend recent feminist
work on postfeminism and neoliberalism (Gill 2007a, 2007b, 2017;
Taylor 2012; McRobbie 2015) to explore their mutually constitutive as
well as antagonistic nature, and we therefore place our analysis within the
larger historical framework of neoliberalism in Australia. Given that both
postfeminism and neoliberalism are transnational phenomena, whose
articulation depends on general elements meshing with local conditions,
how does postfeminism coexist with neoliberalism, Australian-style? In
effect, we therefore wish to position postfeminism (and its cultural narrat-
ives) as part of mainstream Australian political culture rather than ‘some-
thing for the girls’.
Unfortunately, the many studies of Australian neoliberalism rarely con-
sider gender or gender relations as a specific vector of analysis, and
there are no substantial readings of neoliberalism’s figuration in Australian
media and popular culture. But when gender analysis does occur the full
and surprising effects of neoliberalism are revealed, as in Barbara Pocock’s
(2003, 2006) identification of the care deficit afflicting many Australian
families related to time pressures on working women and hence the out-
sourcing of care work (also done by women); Elisabeth Wynhausen’s
Introduction 11
journalistic account of supposedly unskilled women workers in Dirt
Cheap: Life at the Wrong End of the Job Market (2005); or the ways in
which men’s work is becoming more like women’s work – casualised, part-
time, and in the service industries (Broomhill & Sharp 2006). Australian
neoliberalism, as an imported programme rolled out from the early 1980s
onwards,9 has fundamentally transformed Australia. Pusey (2003, p. 6)
describes it as ‘a seismic shift in the distribution of income, power and
resources’ leading to a hollowing out of Middle Australia. For Connell
(2002, p. 5), it is an undoing of the post-Second World War Keynesian set-
tlement between government, business, and labour; Western et al. charac-
terise it as ‘the most profound transformation of Australian public policy
since World War II and one that fundamentally reworked a framework in
place since Federation’, with far-reaching consequence for how we live our
lives (2007, pp. 402, 404).
As Damien Cahill (2008) and Pusey (2003), amongst others, have
found, however, neoliberalism’s hegemony is incomplete: it has not won
over civil society. The Australian people, as Pusey identifies, are deeply
concerned by rising inequality and expect the State to continue its role as
agent of redistributive justice (2003, pp. 150, 156), a thematic also identi-
fied by Rebecca Huntley’s (2019) recent Quarterly Essay, ‘Australia Fair:
Listening to the Nation’. Although we are having to live under the political
and economic hegemony of neoliberalism, we remain attached to the Aus-
tralian mythology of egalitarianism and fairness identified by Russel Ward
(1958), or what Geoffrey Bolton calls ‘a strongly developed tradition of
equity’ (1996, p. 290). Australian postfeminism, particularly its associ-
ation with a more recent and specifically gendered form of egalitarianism
that is second wave feminism, is the ideal space in which to observe the
gendered and popular cultural playing out of imagined everyday neo-
liberalism, as well as its ambivalences and resistances. It is also an ironic
space, given that the Australian mythology of egalitarianism and the ‘fair
go’ for so long excluded, and in many ways continues to exclude, women.
Unsettling postfeminism
As we have thus far made clear, there has been a ‘scholarly over-reliance’
on a particular understanding of postfeminism (Keller & Ryan 2018, p. 6),
which inevitably forecloses other (feminist) ways of reading popular cul-
tural texts. In addition to arguing for greater cultural and historical speci-
ficity, Postfeminism in Context therefore intervenes in ongoing critical
discussions about the efficacy of ‘postfeminism’ itself as an analytical term
(Radner 2010; Whelehan 2010; Lumby 2011; Horbury 2014; Keller &
Ryan 2018), and suggests potential critical uses of the concept. What kind
of work does/can this concept do, and indeed what might it be made to do
if we problematise it, rather than take it as a critical given? Is it as genera-
tive as it once may have been for feminist media and cultural studies? And
12 Introduction
how might further engagement with historical and cultural specificity unset-
tle dominant accounts of its logics?
One of the earliest pieces to question the usefulness, critical relevance,
and limitations of postfeminism for an analysis of popular culture is
Imelda Whelehan’s 2010 article, ‘Remaking Feminism: Or Why Is Post-
feminism So Boring?’ In it, Whelehan argues that:
Notes
1 Scholars in organisational studies (Lewis et al. 2017), health and psychology
(Riley et al. 2018), and law (Gozdecka & Macduff 2018) have recently taken
up this concept.
2 Our use of the term ‘popular feminism’ relates more to earlier work by Megan
Le Masurier about the longer history of feminist ideas being translated for
wider audiences (2007), as well as to our own studies (Henderson 2006, 2013;
Taylor 2008, 2016), rather than recent work by Sarah Banet-Weiser (2018),
which sees it as a more recent commodified, individualised feminism merely
serving to bolster postfeminism (and neoliberalism).
3 Amongst others, Gill (2007a) has argued against such a conceptualisation, but
we suggest it is a valuable way of moving beyond the dominant approaches.
4 Genz and Brabon also refuse this approach of merely ‘ticking off’ key elements
of postfeminism in texts (2009, p. 8).
5 For a detailed analysis of this media event, see Taylor’s Mediating Australian
Feminism (2008).
6 Heywood and Drake (1997, pp. 2–3) define third wave feminism ‘as a movement
that contains elements of second wave critique of beauty culture, sexual abuse,
and power structures while it also acknowledges and makes use of the pleasure,
danger, and defining power of those structures’. For Budgeon (2013, p. 4),
Third wave feminism is defined, first and foremost, by a deconstructive
impulse that seeks to challenge the construction of these categories and to
insist on starting from the perspective of multiple differences rather than
from a position that advocates equivalence.
See also Lotz 2007 for an exploration of the relationship between the third
wave and postfeminism.
7 Rebecca Walker’s 1992 essay, ‘Becoming the third wave’, in Ms. Magazine is
commonly given as a symbolic starting point for the third wave.
8 Although economic rationalism is a ‘peculiarly Australian’ version of neo-
liberalism (Wright 2003, p. vii), the two terms have much in common and are
often used interchangeably. John Wright argues that
[a]n economic rationalist and a neo-liberal will very often agree on what
governments ought to do; in particular, they will agree that governments
ought to reduce their own activities and leave as much as possible up to the
free market. But when they come to explain why they think governments
ought to do this, economic rationalists and neo-liberals might give rather
different answers … The economic rationalist will emphasise efficiency, the
neo-liberal, freedom. We should also note that this difference is also likely
to only be one of emphasis.
(2003, p. 18, original emphasis)
20 Introduction
We use neoliberalism throughout to emphasise the doctrine’s ‘imported’ nature –
that is, its Anglo-American origins (Pusey 2003, p. 9) – as well as to distance
ourselves from two problematic assumptions inherent in the term ‘economic
rationalism’, namely, its rationality and its supposed confinement to the eco-
nomic realm.
9 Pusey, however, dates the first neoliberal initiatives from 1975 (2003, pp. 8–9).
He provides an excellent timeline of Australian neoliberal reforms in appendix
A of The Experience of Middle Australia: The Dark Side of Economic Reform.
10 For example, Banet-Weiser suggests:
While postfeminism and popular feminism are oppositional on the surface,
they are actually mutually sustaining. Indeed, the feminist visions that
come into dominant view in the current moment are shaped by the same
affective politics that shape postfeminism: entrepreneurial spirit, resilience,
gumption.
(2018, p. 20)
References
Appadurai, A. 1996, Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization,
University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Ashby, J. 2010, ‘Postfeminism in the British frame’, Cinema Journal, vol. 44, no. 2,
pp. 127–132.
Bail, K. (ed.) 1996, DIY feminism, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.
Banet-Weiser, S. 2018, Empowered: popular feminism and popular misogyny,
Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Blonski, A., Creed, B., & Freiberg, F. 1987, Don’t shoot darling!: women’s inde-
pendent film-making in Australia, Greenhouse Publications, Richmond.
Bolton, G. 1996, The Oxford history of Australia, volume 5: The middle way,
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Brooks, A. 1998, Postfeminisms: feminism, cultural theory and cultural forms,
Routledge, London.
Broomhill, R. & Sharp, R. 2006, ‘A new gender (dis)order? Neoliberal restructur-
ing in Australia’, in G. Laxer & D. Soron (eds), Not for sale: decommodifying
public life, Broadview Press, Peterborough, Ontario, pp. 127–140.
Brunsdon, C. 1997, Screen tastes: soap opera to satellite dishes, Routledge,
London.
Budgeon, S. 2013, Third wave feminism and the politics of gender in late mod-
ernity, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Burkett, M. & Hamilton, K. 2012, ‘Postfeminist sexual agency: young women’s
negotiations of sexual consent’, Sexualities, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 815–833.
Cahill, D. 2008, ‘Hegemony and the neoliberal historical bloc: the Australian
experience’, in R. Howson & K. Smith (eds), Hegemony: studies in consensus
and coercion, Routledge, New York, pp. 201–217.
Charles, C. 2013, Elite girls schooling, social class and sexualised popular culture,
Routledge, London.
Connell, R. 2002, ‘Moloch mutates: global capitalism and the evolution of the
Australian ruling class, 1977–2002’, Overland, no. 167, pp. 4–14.
Connell, R. 2014, ‘Feminist scholarship and the public realm in postcolonial
Australia’, Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 29, no. 80, pp. 215–230.
Introduction 21
Cronin, A. 2003, ‘Consumerism and “compulsory individuality”: women, will and
potential’, in S. Ahmed, J. Kilby, C. Lury, M. McNeil, & B. Skeggs (eds), Trans-
formations: thinking through feminism, Routledge, London, pp. 273–287.
Dean, J. 2010, ‘Tormented femininities,’ Nora: Nordic Journal of Feminist and
Gender Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 144–147.
Dermody, S. & Jacka, E. 1987, The screening of Australia, Currency Press,
Sydney.
Dosekun, S. 2015, ‘For Western girls only? Post-feminism as transnational culture’,
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 960–975.
Dow, B. 1996, Prime time feminism: television, media culture, and the women’s
movement since 1970, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Driscoll, C. 2018, ‘The girl: dynamics of anxiety and reassurance’, paper presented
at the ‘Crossroads in Cultural Studies’ conference, University of Shanghai, 12–15
August.
Driscoll, C. & Fuller, S. 2015, ‘HBO’s Girls: gender, generation, and quality tele-
vision’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 29, no. 2,
pp. 253–262.
Dux, M. & Simic, Z. 2008, The great feminist denial, Melbourne University Press,
Melbourne.
Edgar, P. & McPhee, H. 1974, Media she, Heinemann, Melbourne.
Eichhorn, K. 2013, The archival turn in feminism: outrage in order, Temple
University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Eisenstein, H. 1996, Inside agitators: Australian femocrats and the state, Allen &
Unwin, St Leonards.
Elias, A., Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (eds) 2017, Aesthetic labour: rethinking beauty
politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Feher, M. 2009, ‘Self-appreciation, or, the aspirations of human capital’, Public
Culture, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–41.
Felski, R. 2015, The limits of critique, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
Fraser, N. 2013, Fortunes of feminism: from state-managed capitalism to neolib-
eral crisis, Verso Books, London.
Fuller, S. & Driscoll, C. 2015, ‘HBO’s Girls: gender, generation, and quality
television’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 29, no. 2,
pp. 253–262.
Garner, H. 1995, The first stone: some questions about sex and power, Picador,
Melbourne.
Genz, S. 2006, ‘Third way/ve: the politics of postfeminism’, Feminist Theory, vol. 7,
no. 3, pp. 333–353.
Genz, S. 2009, Postfemininities in popular culture, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Genz, S. & Brabon B.A. 2009, Postfeminism: cultural texts and theories,
Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Gill, R. 2007a, Gender and the media, Polity, Cambridge.
Gill, R. 2007b, ‘Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility,’ European
Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–166.
Gill, R. 2016, ‘Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times’,
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 610–630.
Gill, R. 2017, ‘The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: a postfemi-
nist sensibility 10 years on’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 20, no. 6,
pp. 606–626.
22 Introduction
Gill, R. & Orgad, S. 2015, ‘The confidence cult(ure)’, Australian Feminist Studies,
vol. 30, no. 86, pp. 324–344.
Gozdecka, D. & Macduff, A. 2018, Feminism, postfeminism, and legal theory:
beyond the gendered subject, Routledge, London.
Grace, H. & Stephen, A. 1981, ‘Where do positive images come from? (and what
does a woman want?)’, Scarlet Woman, no. 12, March, pp. 15–22.
Guo, J. forthcoming, ‘Postfeminism in China: urban young women’s aesthetic labour
on social media’, Doctoral thesis, Department of Gender and Cultural Studies,
University of Sydney.
Harris, A. 2004, Future girl: young women in the twenty-first century, Routledge,
London.
Harvey, D. 2005, A brief history of neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Henderson, M. 2006, Marking feminist times: remembering the longest revolution
in Australia, Peter Lang, Bern.
Henderson, M. 2013, ‘A celebratory feminist aesthetics in postfeminist times:
screening the Australian women’s liberation in Paper giants – The birth of Cleo’,
Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 28, no. 77, pp. 250–262.
Henderson, M. 2016, ‘Retrovisioning chicko roles: Puberty blues as postfeminist
television adaptation and the feminisation of the 1970s’, Continuum: Journal of
Media Studies, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 326–335.
Henry, A. 2004, Not my mother’s sister: generational conflict and third wave fem-
inism, University of Indiana Press, Bloomington, IN.
Heywood, L. & Drake, J. 1997, ‘Introduction’, in L. Heywood & J. Drake (eds),
Third wave agenda: being feminist, doing feminism, Minnesota University Press,
Minneapolis, MN, pp. 1–22.
Hollows, J. 2000, Feminism, femininity and popular culture, Manchester University
Press, Manchester.
Horbury, A. 2014, ‘Post-feminist impasses in popular heroine television’, Contin-
uum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 213–225.
Huntley, R. 2019, ‘Australia fair: listening to the nation’, Quarterly Essay, no. 73,
Black Inc., Melbourne.
Kanai, A. 2019, Gender and relatability in digital culture: managing affect,
intimacy and value, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Kaplan, G. 1996, The meagre harvest: the Australian women’s movement 1950s–
1990s, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Keller, J. & Ryan, M.E. 2018, ‘Introduction: Mapping emergent feminisms’, in
J. Keller & M.E. Ryan (eds), Emergent feminisms: Complicating a postfeminist
media culture, Routledge, London, pp. 1–22.
Lake, M. 1999, Getting equal: the history of Australian feminism, Allen & Unwin,
St Leonards.
Le Masurier, M. 2007, ‘My other, my self: Cleo magazine and feminism in 1970s
Australia,’ Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 22, no. 53, pp. 191–211.
Lewis, P., Benshop, Y., & Simpson, R. 2017, Postfeminism and organisation,
Routledge, London.
Lotz, A.D. 2001, ‘Postfeminist television criticism: rehabilitating critical terms and
identifying postfeminist attributes’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 1, no. 1,
pp. 105–121.
Lotz, A.D 2007, ‘Theorising the intermezzo: the contributions of postfeminism and
third wave feminism’, in S. Gillis, G. Howie, & R. Munford (eds), Third wave
Introduction 23
feminism: a critical exploration, 2nd edn, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke,
pp. 71–85.
Lumby, C. 2011, ‘Past the post in feminist media studies’, Feminist Media Studies,
vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 95–100.
McDermott, C. 2018, ‘How to survive the postfeminist impasse: Grace Helbig’s
affective aesthetics’, Girlhood Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 50–66.
McRobbie, A. 2009, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change,
Sage, London.
McRobbie, A. 2015, ‘Notes on the perfect: competitive femininity in neoliberal
times’, Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 30, no. 83, pp. 3–20.
Modleski, T. 1991, Feminism without women: culture and criticism in a ‘postfemi-
nist’ age, Routledge, New York.
Morris, M. 1988, The pirate’s fiancee: feminism, reading, postmodernism, Verso,
London.
Munford, R. & Waters, M. 2014, Feminism and popular culture: investigating the
postfeminist mystique, Rutgers University Press, New York.
Nash, M. 2013, ‘Brides n’ bumps: a critical look at bridal pregnancy identities,
maternity wedding dresses, and post-feminism’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 13,
no. 4, pp. 593–612.
Negra, D. 2009, What a girl wants? fantasizing the reclamation of self in postfemi-
nism, Routledge, London.
Nicholson, L. 2010, ‘Feminism in “waves”: useful metaphor or not?’ New Politics,
vol. 12, no. 40, viewed 20 April 2019, https://newpol.org/issue_post/feminism-
waves-useful-metaphor-or-not/.
Pocock, B. 2003, The work/life collision: what work is doing to Australians and
what to do about it, The Federation Press, Annandale.
Pocock, B. 2006, The labour market ate my babies: work, children and a sustain-
able future, The Federation Press, Annandale.
Projansky, S. 2001, Watching rape: film and television in postfeminist culture,
New York University Press, New York.
Pusey, M. 2003, The experience of middle Australia: the dark side of economic
reform, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Radner, H. 2010, Neofeminist cinema: girly films, chick flicks and consumer
culture, Routledge, New York.
Ricoeur, P. 1970, Freud and philosophy: an essay on interpretation, D. Savage
(trans.), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Riley, S., Evans, A., & Robson, M. 2018, Postfeminism and health, Routledge,
London.
Rimmer, S.H. & Sawer M. 2016, ‘Neoliberalism and gender equality policy
in Australia’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no. 1,
pp. 742–758.
Rivers, N. 2017, Postfeminism(s) and the arrival of fourth wave feminism: turning
tides, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Robinson, P. 2011, ‘Mobilising postfeminism: young Australian women discuss
Sex and the city and Desperate housewives’, Continuum: Journal of Media &
Cultural Studies, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 111–124.
Roof, J. 1997, ‘Generational difficulties; or the fear of a barren history’, in
D. Looser & E.A. Kaplan (eds), Generations: academic feminists in dialogue,
University Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 69–87.
24 Introduction
Rose, N. 1996, Inventing ourselves: psychology, power and personhood,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rosenfelt, D. & Stacey J. 1990, ‘Second thoughts on the second wave’, in
K.V. Hansen & I.J. Philipson (eds), Women, class, and the feminist imagination: a
socialist feminist reader, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 549–567.
Rottenberg, C. 2018, The rise of neoliberal feminism, Oxford University Press,
Oxford.
Scharff, C. 2012, Repudiating feminism: young women in a neoliberal world,
Ashgate, Farnham.
Sedgwick, E.K. 2002, Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, performativity, Duke
University Press, Durham, NC.
Sharpe, M. & Boucher, G. 2007, ‘Neither liberal nor conservative: Australia’s
postmodern conservatism’, Arena Magazine, August–September, pp. 23–27.
Sheridan, S. 1988, ‘Introduction’, in S Sheridan (ed.), Grafts: feminist cultural criti-
cism, Verso, London, pp. 1–10.
Summers, A. 2003, The end of equality: work, babies, and women’s choices in 21st
century Australia, Random House, Milsons Point.
Swarts, J. 2000, Constructing neoliberalism: economic transformation in Anglo-
American democracies, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Tasker Y. & Negra, D. 2007, ‘Introduction: Feminist politics and postfeminist
culture’, in Y. Tasker & D. Negra (eds), Interrogating postfeminism: gender and
the politics of popular culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 1–25.
Taylor, A. 2008, Mediating Australian feminism: re-reading The First Stone media
event, Peter Lang, Oxford.
Taylor, A. 2009, ‘Dear daughter: popular feminism, the epistolary form and the
limits of generational rhetoric’, Australian Literary Studies, vol. 24, no. 3–4,
pp. 96–107.
Taylor, A. 2012, Single women in popular culture: the limits of postfeminism,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Taylor, A. 2016, Celebrity and the feminist blockbuster, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
‘The mother’s club’ 2002, Sydney Morning Herald, 7 September, viewed 17 April
2019, www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/09/06/1031115937062.html.
Thurlow, C. & Aiello, G. 2007, ‘National pride, global capital: a social semiotic
analysis of transnational visual branding in the airline industry’, Visual Commu-
nication, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 305–344.
Varney, D. 2016, ‘ “Not now, not ever”: Julia Gillard and the performative power
of affect’, in E. Diamond et al. (eds), Performance, feminism and affect in neolib-
eral times, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 25–38.
Walker, R. 1992, ‘Becoming the third wave’, Ms. Magazine, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 39–41.
Ward, R.B. 1958, The Australian legend, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
Watson, S. (ed.) 1990, Playing the state: Australian feminist interventions, Allen &
Unwin, Sydney.
Western, M. et al. 2007, ‘Neoliberalism, inequality and politics: the changing face
of Australia’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 401–418.
Whelehan, I. 2005, The feminist bestseller: from Sex and the single girl to Sex and
the city, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Whelehan, I. 2010, ‘Remaking feminism: or why is postfeminism so boring?’,
Nordic Journal of English Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 155–172.
Introduction 25
Wood, R. & Litherland, B. 2018, ‘Critical feminist hope: the encounter of neo-
liberalism and popular feminism in WEE 24: women’s evolution’, Feminist
Media Studies, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 905–922.
Wright, J. 2003, The ethics of economic rationalism, UNSW Press, Sydney.
Wynhausen, E. 2005, Dirt cheap: life at the wrong end of the job market,
Macmillan, Sydney.
1 Chick lit
Novels of postfeminist
independence and aspiration
There is evidence that the same individuals, the same human beings
who are increasingly subject to, and the subjects of, such space eco-
nomies are simultaneously becoming increasingly reflexive with respect
to them … taking on an increasingly critical and reflexive distance with
reference to these institutions of the new information society.
(1994, p. 4)
Indeed, this is what we find with our heroines of Australian chick lit: socially
mobile while ensconced in a specifically feminine space of contemporary
capitalism (i.e. the fashion–beauty–media complex), but they use humour
and parody to voice the critical reflexivity identified by Lash and Urry.
In addition, Australian chick lit expresses this location in its local take
on an initially Anglo-American (though now globalising) literary form.
Like the global women’s magazines it satirises, such as Cosmopolitan or
Vogue – with their multiple international editions synecdochical of the
larger transnational dynamic of post-Fordist capitalism – Australian chick
lit takes on generic features of chick lit but transposes them onto local con-
ditions.5 As we demonstrate, Australian chick lit is distinguished from
chick lit in other contexts by a cultural diversity of writers and heroines, a
decentring of romance in favour of work and hedonism, and a feminist-
inspired parodic critique of middle-class aspirations and postindustrial
femininities, even as it rehearses their allure. In combination, these charac-
teristics produce a more nuanced and politically progressive genre than is
usually acknowledged, even by the defenders of chick lit.
Through its Bildung (or process of self-formation) centred on female
aspiration rather than romance, Australian chick lit symbolises two forms
of aspiration that have characterised Australia, and specifically young
women, from the 1980s onwards: second wave feminist narratives and ide-
ologemes of aspirations for freedom and independence (whether economic,
sexual, political, or subjective), and neoliberal narratives of material and
financial aspiration and social mobility. These blended types of aspiration
form the core of the heroine’s Bildung, and produce the double-voicedness,
or a feminist parodic reflexivity, that characterises the genre. Australian
chick lit’s engagement with the seemingly superficial reveals a critical con-
sciousness of and in postfeminist culture.
Author Title
Here, and throughout the novel, Foster stresses the inextricable links
between beauty, magazines, and commerce that amplify the absurdity of
work in the fashion–beauty–media complex.
Similarly, across all of Jacenko’s novels, the PR queen, Jazzy Lou, pro-
vides a ruthless dissection of public relations, celebrity, fashion, and media,
offering the reader detailed case studies of just how products are really
launched, reputations made and remade, and how the circuits of fame fuel
the industry of popular taste. Rudd’s heroine, Ruby, in the different realm
of political parties (though never named, the party resembles the progres-
sive, centre left Australian Labor Party), is increasingly cynical about the
machinations of the party machine and electoral success, until closing the
second novel with a mild affirmation of faith in the political system. Like-
wise, Kendall’s international flight attendant in Versace Sisters, Bella,
seems set to reject her job’s apparently glamorous lifestyle: on her last
flight she does not purchase any discount Versace in Los Angeles. And
Samira, in Courting Samira, leaves Bridal Bazaar magazine – a title that
unsettles Western stereotypes of Muslim arranged marriages – to take up a
photography cadetship. While successful, these aspirational women are
Lash and Urry’s reflexive subjects rather than cultural dupes.
Heiss’s and Abdel-Fattah’s novels offer a significant contrast to the inau-
thentic jobs of our Anglo-Celt heroines, with characters engaged in
politically committed work – in the cultural sector for Heiss, or in com-
munity work for Abdel-Fattah – another feature that confounds Western
stereotypes. Lauren O’Mahony (2018, p. 54) describes Heiss’s project as
34 Chick lit
c onsciousness-raising for white readers; similarly, Imogen Mathew argues
that ‘Heiss’s chick lit functions as an instructional text, exposing readers to
new perspectives on contemporary Aboriginal culture and identity’ (2016,
p. 335). In effect, Heiss writes a counter-advice manual for her white
readers. As part of this pedagogical project, her heroines, like the author
herself (Mathew 2016, p. 342), are literally curators of contemporary Abori-
ginal culture, and hence are makers of a different set of signs of Aboriginal
identity to those pathologised representations produced by the white Aus-
tralian media. Thus, the detailed descriptions of their working lives –
arranging exhibitions, writing arts policy, organising artist visits, lobbying
white bureaucrats, meeting with overseas Indigenous artists – make explicit,
normalise, and mainstream the networks of Aboriginal cultural production.
Similarly, No Sex in the City’s Esma – with her Master’s degree, and her
group of friends including Ruby, a Greek Orthodox lawyer, Nirvana, an
Indian-Australian midwife, and Lily, a Jewish radical lawyer – confounds
another set of pathologised representations reserved for non-Anglo women
as passive victims of oppressive religious traditions (a position we see the
xenophobic politician Pauline Hanson articulating in our final chapter).
Instead, both authors represent work as meaningful and vital; their hero-
ines’ critical consciousness is reserved for white co-workers’ ignorance.
Regardless of the fashion–beauty–media complex’s apparent superficial-
ity, being a worker or career woman is not the problem, and although the
girl usually ends up with the guy, like the television series we examine
next, Australian chick lit shows little interest in narratives of maternal or
married retreatism so familiar to postfeminist media culture (Negra 2009).
While a heroine may want to slow down the pace of work – Jazzy Lou, for
example, tries to sell her agency in The Rumour Mill (Jacenko 2013), or
find a husband (Abdel-Fattah 2012 and Awad 2012) – the space of work is
the space of self-realisation and freedom. This is evident in the amount of
textual space devoted to the workplace compared to the domestic and the
romantic, the dominant work-based temporality of the novels and, most
importantly, the heroine’s sense of aliveness at work, as the following
passage from The Wrong Girl makes clear:
As Lily sat down in her chair, she looked at the spreadsheet on her
screen, and a shiver of excitement whizzed through her body. Some-
times, with so much stress and so many morons taking precedence
much of the time, she forgot how much she loved her job. Jesus, she
was getting her jollies from Excel; she really needed some action. But
as Lily read over what she’d created, she couldn’t help the small hum
of delight from creeping back in.
(Foster 2014, p. 128)
Similarly, Esma’s volunteering at the Refugee Centre makes her reflect that
‘I drive home exhilarated, humbled and overwhelmed by a sense that it’s
Chick lit 35
here, at the centre, that I am really starting to find my own identity and
place in the world’ (Abdel-Fattah 2012, p. 57). So, although the novels are
punctuated by the romantic rituals of flirting and dating, these occur
within, and are secondary to in most novels, a detailed evocation of the
heroines’ working lives. At times one feels as if reading someone’s diary of,
or how-to guide for, the contemporary workplace – pragmatic career
advice compared to the calculating magic that characterises Australian
women’s self-help books (see Chapter 5). For instance, Heiss’s novels,
although in many ways the most conventional in terms of the romance
plot, continually revolve around the strategies the heroines use to further
Aboriginal culture through their work as bureaucrats. Female agency is lit-
eralised by this detailed evocation of working life.
The fantasy of how second wave feminism could have played out con-
tinues in the nature of the workplace. These are typically highly feminised
spaces: women are often in senior positions; men are peripheral, and when
they do occur novels tend to feature alternative masculinities such as
artists and gay men. Work represents competency, connection, independ-
ence, and a sense of possibility – a form that we suspect can only be ima-
gined in a largely female workplace. Unlike the bitchy boss we see in, for
example, The Devil Wears Prada (Weisberger 2003), the female boss is
someone powerful and worthy of emulation; if the heroine becomes a boss
she is at pains to point out how she treats her employees decently, as does
Abby in Foster’s The Younger Man:
Every so often she had a girl (beautiful women attracted fuckwits like
silk shirts soaked up olive oil) who was clearly in love with an abusive,
be it physical or emotional, boyfriend, and Abby always felt compelled
to make sure her girls were okay, and to offer some help.
(2012, p. 25)
we’re all victims of the same stretching machine. We’re being torn,
whether we’re MPs or Senators, party leaders or backbenchers, car-
toonists or press secs. We mightn’t agree with each other’s politics but
we need to help each other out because we’re the only ones who
understand what that’s like.
(2011, p. 32)
Most importantly, these working women act on and in the world; their
working lives are about making things happen. In Campaign Ruby, the
heroine has to rapidly organise a strategy to make an overly glamorous
36 Chick lit
candidate more electable: ‘My gut took over. “She needs an image over-
haul, she needs the local party to unite behind her and she needs to give
newspapers here something good to say about her” ’ (Rudd 2010, p. 237).
She executes the strategy perfectly. Laura, the curator of Aboriginal art,
organises an exhibition in New York almost single-handedly. No Sex in
the City’s Esma volunteers at the Sydney Refugee Centre. These evocations
of the agency associated with work differ so radically from the entrepre-
neurial, positive-thinking ‘self’ found in our self-help books. Harzewski
astutely observes that chick lit blends elements of the adventure story and
the romance (2011, p. 25); in nearly all examples we examine, the adven-
ture story is firmly located in the spaces and narratives of work.
Correspondingly, these heroines (with a couple of exceptions) are neither
the anxious incompetents like Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones, nor top girl
perfectionists identified by McRobbie (2007); rather, they take work ser-
iously, and either know or learn the importance of faking it at work.
Hannah, the inexperienced beauty editor of Gloss magazine, manages to
give a perfect presentation to potential advertisers:
When I put down my order I paid the deposit in cash. This is my tradi-
tion when buying a car. In a weird way it adds to the buzz, handing
over an envelope as thick as a brick, stuffed with notes. I earned it,
why not get a power kick from spending it.
(Jacenko 2014, p. 59)
38 Chick lit
As a consequence, Australian chick lit avoids what Diane Negra and Yvonne
Tasker term the recessionary culture of post-Global Financial Crisis popular
culture: ‘Recessionary culture maintains these [postfeminist] celebratory
discourses of course but, we argue, they are underwritten or more precisely
contextualised by a perception that equality is a luxury that can no longer
be afforded’ (2014, p. 4). This difference, we contend, arises from the Aus-
tralian context of over 25 years of economic growth, including the mining
boom, and the federal Labor government’s approach (during Kevin Rudd’s
leadership) to managing the Global Financial Crisis via the stimulus
package rather than austerity measures, for example (Taylor & Uren
2010). Australian chick lit is a novel for times when equality and luxury
can both be afforded or imagined to be so.
Jacenko’s Jazzy Lou series, Kendall’s designer label novels, and Maggie
Alderson’s Pants on Fire and Mad About the Boy are the most explicit
regarding class and money, and hence indicate the ways in which chick lit
maintains the contradictory and specifically Australian fantasies of aspira-
tion and egalitarianism through the moral coding of the middle and
working classes. Indeed, they do evince a form of nostalgia that Heike
Mißler observes as specific to chick lit, and which acts as a criticism of the
present (2017, pp. 174, 178). The overarching narrative in the Jazzy Lou
novels is that of a working-class girl who overcomes being sacked from her
first PR job, sets up her own PR agency, and ends up a wealthy and
powerful PR mogul: a classic narrative of post-Fordist capitalist and post-
feminist aspiration. Jacenko, however, provides a weird and hence signi-
ficant moment regarding class. Jazzy Lou is at pains to dis-identify with
Sydney’s eastern suburbs rich girls who dominate the PR and media indus-
tries, instead basing her success on her working-class Jewish origins: ‘I trod
like a lemming the well-worn track laid down by my parents. The path,
that is, of plain old hard work’ (2012, pp. 6–7). We contend that Jazzy
Lou identifies with a working-class identity because of its moral superi-
ority compared to the superficiality of her hard-won middle-class milieu.10
This moral coding and hierarchy feature in a number of the other novels,
as in Heiss’s Tiddas when the heroines return to their working-class child-
hood home of Mudgee, and through the depiction of Zoe Foster’s shop
assistant heroine in Playing the Field, and the rural working people of
Kendall’s Chanel Sweethearts. In contrast to the triumph of middle-class
values that Jennifer Scanlon (2013) observes in American post-GFC chick
lit, Australian chick lit signals the losses incurred by individual aspiration
and seemingly unfettered social mobility and consumerism, and a continuing
attachment to egalitarianism. Although, as our chapter on female political
leaders reveals, Australian egalitarianism can have retrograde implications for
women as well.
In the case of Jazzy Lou, because of her imagined working-class origins,
money and its transformation into markers of bourgeois taste and visible
success dominate her life. She continually refers to how much it costs for
Chick lit 39
her lifestyle (see, for example, the third novel, The Spotlight, when she
moves into a five star hotel while the house is being renovated for the
second time in a year), how much the business is earning, how much its
earnings have grown, what the particular budgets are for various projects,
and what staff cost and expend:
I’ve been accused in the past of being a cut-throat boss with zero com-
passion (well, that’s how one ex-employee described me in a recent
lawsuit). Yet Anya, my longest-serving Bee, is proof that if you keep
your nose to the grindstone, working for me does pay off. Anya has
just bought a $1 million house in Double Bay, where she stores her
convertible Mercedes in the undercover car park. Her wardrobe is
even bigger and brassier than mine (remember, I also have a toddler
with expensive taste in clothes).
(Jacenko 2014, p. 20)
Mim and Tiffany needed a chance to check their reflections and swap
crowd observations. It was clear that this was the year of the boot –
and everyone who was anyone was boasting a pair under the ubi-
quitous wrap dress. High boots, low boots or ankle boots – boot-mania
had obviously struck.
(Kendall 2007, p. 119)
But me, I was fresh off the beauty boat, and I was light years away
from cynical. The moment I walked into a boardroom/café/elaborately
decorated garden tent, I unwittingly fell to my knees before the reli-
gion of face wash. Or eyeliner or teeth whitener, depending on what
was being offered in between mini fruit-salads and scrambled egg con-
coctions fit only for people who think capers count as actual food.
(Foster 2008, p. 81)
Conclusion
If one wishes to see a fantasmatic rendering of how feminism could have
played out for young women in contemporary Australia, chick lit’s
50 Chick lit
semioscape of independence and aspiration is ideal, and its use by non-
Anglo-Celt women to represent their historically and geographically
located fictions of self indicates the potential of the form to write back at
constraining tropes of non-Western femininities (Newns 2018, pp. 296–
297), and the deep attractions of freedom and mobility. Indeed, of the
various forms we examine, chick lit is the one that most closely articu-
lates an Australian context, even as it draws upon the transnational
chick lit tropes of work, pleasure, consumerism, and beauty. Its aspira-
tional Bildung perfectly narrativises a specifically feminine economy of
signs and space characterising affluent neoliberal Australia, the continuing
impact and dissemination of second wave feminism here, as well as the
pleasures of, and ambivalence regarding, women’s location in this space.
As such, Australian chick lit tells a different story about postfeminism to
the hegemonic version, one that is cause for some optimism rather than
despair or dismissal.
On the level of individual texts, the signifiers attached to the core ele-
ments of work, class, hedonism, and femininities coalesce into a young
woman’s narrative of partial but appealing economic and personal auto-
nomy – an updating of the romance novel that ironically decentres
romance. Chick lit, rather than being a dupe to consumerism, instead
exhibits a feminist parodic reflexivity – a satirical and parodic awareness
of the fashion–beauty–media complex and its role as base, superstructure,
and metonym of women’s location in the economy of signs and space. The
figure of the hedonistic female fetishist is a marker of women’s social power,
and of the power of contemporary capitalism – the fetish as seductive com-
pensation for the limits to her (and feminism’s) power. In a distinctive rever-
sal of the characteristic trope of postfeminism, Australian chick lit has had a
feminist makeover to acknowledge both the freedoms and constraints of
women’s lives, while the 1970s novel of women’s experiences has had a
chick lit makeover to acknowledge aspirations and pleasures attached to the
economy of signs and space.
Australian chick lit, like most of the magazines and some of the beauty
vloggers we examine in later chapters, in its address to young women from
all ethnicities to be guilt-free luxury consumers, also captures a broader
aspirational narrative connected to Australia’s part in globalising and
deregulated post-Fordist capitalism, and this narrative’s role in an
attempted remaking of the Australian middle class and working class. The
deregulation of the Australian economy that occurred from the 1980s on
was also accompanied by a cultural and social narrative of material and
financial aspiration that Sean Scalmer (2008), amongst others, argues takes
shape in the 1990s.14 Reward culture, the priority of the consumer rather
than protestant restraint, and a mélange of old and new cultural (read
class) loyalties (Gabriel 2003; Dyrenfurth 2007; Burgmann 2008) are
major parts of this aspirational narrative, and thus luxury goods conspicu-
ously consumed become legitimate – a sign of an active and successful
Chick lit 51
participant in a post-industrialising and globalising Australia. And young
women, as signs of feminist energy, freedom, hope, and a new form of
national egalitarianism – this time, in a gendered form – are ideal to fic-
tionally embody simultaneously these two powerful national narratives of
the last few decades. In the next chapter, which focuses on television
dramedy’s semioscape of postfeminist kinship, a similarly atypical set of
postfeminist narratives emerges.
Notes
1 See John Ezard (2001) for coverage of novelists such as Beryl Bainbridge’s
attack on the genre, and Heike Mißler (2017) for an account of the controver-
sies surrounding chick lit.
2 Margaret Rowntree and Imogen Mathew are exceptions.
3 Pierre Bourdieu describes cultural intermediaries as ‘the vendors of symbolic
goods and services, the directors and executives of firms in tourism and journ-
alism, publishing and the cinema, fashion and advertising, decoration and
property development’ (2007, pp. 310–311). Expanding upon Bourdieu, Mike
Featherstone defines ‘cultural intermediaries’ as those workers located between
academia and the media who ‘are engaged in providing symbolic goods and
services’ (2007, p. 44), and who are therefore symptomatic of post-Fordist
capitalism.
4 The Australian Industry Report 2016 notes that the Services sectors are the
largest employers and contributors to the Australian economy, ‘representing
just over 60 per cent of GDP’ (Cully 2016, p. 35). See also the Australian
Bureau of Statistics (2017) where the last decade’s decline in manufacturing
and mining, and the rise in the services sectors are identified. The Workplace
Gender Equality Agency reports the high proportion of women in the services
sectors (and hence the continuing gender segregation of the Australian labour
market) (2016, p. 5).
5 Eva Chen (2012) also notes this dynamic in her analysis of Chinese, Hungarian,
and Indian chick lit.
6 Suzanne Ferriss and Mallory Young note that the genre is diversifying beyond
these confines in the US (2006, pp. 5–7), while critics such as Wenche Ommund-
sen and Sandra Ponzanesi analyse non-Western versions of chick lit, and Fem-
inist Theory has recently published a special issue, ‘Chick-lit in a time of African
cosmopolitanism’ (Frenkel & Gupta 2019).
7 A significant number of Australian chick lit novels feature a heroine working in
the United States or Europe as part of the global fashion–beauty–media
complex, such as Sophie Lee’s Alice in La La Land (2008) and Maggie
Alderson’s Handbags and Gladrags (2004), as did Lette’s The Llama Parlour.
These international settings are further evidence of the genre’s mobility – its
transnational nature.
8 Cate Kendall is the nom de plume of Michelle Hamer, journalist, and Lisa
Blundell, advertising copywriter. Their background as cultural intermediaries is
common for chick lit authors, including ones in this chapter.
9 Two Austrian chick lit novels, Die Wahl (Pluhar 2003) and Jessica, 30
(Streeruwitz 2004) engage with Austrian politics, with Die Wahl featuring a
female political politician as its heroine. See Fiddler’s (2011) analysis.
10 Jacenko’s penchant for blurring real life with her fiction is ironically demon-
strated by the jailing of her stockbroker husband, Oliver Curtis, for insider
trading.
52 Chick lit
11 Freud’s fetishists were all male, and it was inconceivable within the Freudian
paradigm that women or girls would have castration anxiety linked to the loss
of the maternal penis. Early accounts that explored female fetishism are Sarah
Kofman (1980), Naomi Schor (1985), Emily Apter (1991), and Elizabeth Grosz
(1993).
12 This difference bears out Ommundsen’s insight that non-Western chick lit
negotiates the interaction between the heroines’ ‘alternative modernities’ and
Western consumer culture (2011, p. 108). For these non-Western women,
desiring the virgin husband or the handsome male body is more of an issue
than for white middle-class postfeminist women.
13 One of Bridget’s New Year’s resolutions is ‘Not go out every night but stay in
and read books and listen to classical music’ (Fielding 1996, p. 3).
14 We contend that this rhetoric emerged earlier, in the 1980s as the ALP govern-
ment deregulated the economy. Evidence for this is in Treasurer Paul Keating’s
socio-economic rhetoric of dynamism that accompanied these policies (Morris
1992).
References
Abdel-Fattah, R. 2012, No sex in the city, Pan Macmillan, Sydney.
Abdullah, M. & Awan, S. 2017, ‘Islamic postfeminism and Muslim chick-lit: coex-
istence of conflicting discourses’, Pakistan Journal of Women’s Studies: Alam-e-
Niswan, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 93–105.
Alderson, M. 2000, Pants on fire, Penguin, Camberwell.
Alderson, M. 2002, Mad about the boy, Penguin, Camberwell.
Alderson, M. 2004, Handbags and gladrags, Penguin, Camberwell.
Apter, E. 1991, Feminizing the fetish: psychoanalysis and narrative obsession in
turn-of-the-century France, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Arthurs, J. 2003, ‘Sex and the city and consumer culture: remediating postfeminist
drama’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 83–98.
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2017, Australian industry, 2015–16, ABS Catalogue
No. 8155.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
Awad, A. 2012, Courting Samira, Amal Awad, [s.l.].
Bellanta, M. 2012, Larrikins: a history, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia.
Bourdieu, P. 2007, Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste, trans.
R. Nice, Routledge, New York.
Burgmann, V. 2008, ‘Aspirational authoritarianism: Howard governments v. new
social movements’, Social Alternatives, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 10–16.
Butler, J. 2013, ‘For white girls only? Postfeminism and the politics of inclusion’,
Feminist Formations, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–58.
Butler, P. & Desai, J. 2008, ‘Manolos, marriage, and mantras: chick-lit criticism
and transnational feminism’, Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism, vol. 8,
no. 2, pp. 1–31.
Chen, E. 2012, ‘Shanghai(ed) babies: geopolitics, biopolitics, and the global chick
lit’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 214–228.
Cully, M. 2016, Australian industry report 2016, Office of the Chief Economist,
Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Canberra.
Dyrenfurth, N. 2007, ‘John Howard’s hegemony of values: the politics of “mate-
ship” in the Howard decade’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 42, no. 2,
pp. 211–230.
Chick lit 53
Ebert, T.L. 2009, The task of cultural critique, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
Elder, C. 2007, Being Australian: narratives of national identity, Allen & Unwin,
Crows Nest.
Elias, A., Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (eds) 2017, Aesthetic labour: rethinking beauty
politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Ezard, J. 2001, ‘Bainbridge tilts at “chick lit” cult’, Guardian, 24 August, viewed
29 April 2019, www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/aug/24/books.generalfiction.
Farr, C.K. 2009, ‘It was chick lit all along: the gendering of a genre’, in L.J. Goren
(ed.), You’ve come a long way, baby: women, politics, and popular culture,
University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, pp. 201–214.
Featherstone, M. 2007, Consumer culture and postmodernism, Sage, London.
Ferriss, S. 2015, ‘Working girls: the precariat of chick lit’, in E. Levine (ed.), Cup-
cakes, pinterest, and ladyporn: feminized popular culture in the early twenty-first
century, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, pp. 177–195.
Ferriss, S. & Young, M. (eds) 2006, Chick lit: the new women’s fiction, Routledge,
New York.
Fiddler, A. 2011, ‘Of political intentions and trivial conventions: Erika Pluhar’s
Die Wahl (2003) and Marlene Streeruwitz’s Jessica, 30. (2004)’, German Life
and Letters, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 133–144.
Fielding, H. 1996, Bridget Jones’s diary: a novel, Picador, London.
Foster, Z. 2008, Air kisses, Penguin, Camberwell.
Foster, Z. 2010, Playing the field, Penguin, Camberwell.
Foster, Z. 2012, The younger man, Penguin, Camberwell.
Foster, Z. 2014, The wrong girl, Penguin, Camberwell.
Frenkel, R. & Gupta, P. (eds) 2019, ‘Chick-lit in a time of African cosmopolitan-
ism,’ special issue of Feminist Theory, vol. 20, no. 2.
Freud, S. 1927, ‘Fetishism’, in The complete psychological works of Sigmund
Freud, J. Strachey (ed. & trans.), Hogarth, London, vol. XXI, pp. 149–157.
Gabriel, M. 2003, ‘Aspirationalism: the search for respect in an unequal society’,
Journal of Australian Studies, vol. 27, no. 80, pp. 147–156.
Gamble, S. 2006, ‘Growing up single: the postfeminist novel’, Studies in the Lit-
erary Imagination, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 61–78.
Genz, S. 2010, ‘Singled out: postfeminism’s “new woman” and the dilemma of having
it all’, Journal of Popular Culture, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 97–119.
Genz, S. & Brabon, B.A. 2009, Postfeminism: cultural texts and theories, Edin-
burgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Gill, R. 2007a, Gender and the media, Polity, Cambridge.
Gill, R. 2007b, ‘Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility’, European
Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–166.
Gill, R. 2008, ‘Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times’, Sub-
jectivity, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 432–445.
Gill, R. & Herdieckerhoff, E. 2006, ‘Rewriting the romance: new femininities in
chick lit’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 487–504.
Grosz, E. 1993, ‘Lesbian fetishism?’, in E. Apter & W. Pietz (eds), Fetishism as cul-
tural discourse, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 101–115.
Harvey, D. 1989, The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of
cultural change, Blackwell, Oxford.
Harzewski, S. 2011, Chick lit and postfeminism, University of Virginia Press,
Charlottesville, VA.
54 Chick lit
Heiss, A. 2007, Not meeting Mr Right, Random House, Sydney.
Heiss, A. 2008, Avoiding Mr Right, Random House, Sydney.
Heiss, A. 2010, Manhattan dreaming, Random House, Sydney.
Heiss, A. 2011, Paris dreaming, Random House, Sydney.
Heiss, A. 2014, Tiddas, Simon & Schuster, Sydney.
Hurt, E. 2019, ‘Introduction’, in E. Hurt (ed.), Theorizing ethnicity and nationality
in the chick lit genre, Routledge, New York, pp. 1–24.
Jacenko, R. 2012, Strictly confidential: a Jazzy Lou novel, Allen & Unwin,
Sydney.
Jacenko, R. 2013, The rumour mill: a Jazzy Lou novel, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Jacenko, R. 2014, The spotlight: a Jazzy Lou novel, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Kanai, A. 2017, ‘The best friend, the boyfriend, other girls, hot guys, and creeps: the
relational production of self on tumblr’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 17, no. 6,
pp. 911–925.
Kaplan, G. 1996, The meagre harvest: the Australian women’s movement 1950s–
1990s Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Kendall, C. 2007, Gucci mamas, Random House, Sydney.
Kendall, C. 2009, Versace sisters, Random House, Sydney.
Kendall, C. 2010, Chanel sweethearts, Random House, Sydney.
Kendall, C. 2011, Armani angels, Random House, Sydney.
Kofman, S. 1980, The enigma of woman: woman in Freud’s writings, Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Lake, M. 1999, Getting equal: the history of Australian feminism, Allen & Unwin,
St Leonards.
Lash, S. & Urry, J. 1994, Economies of signs and space, Sage, London.
Lazar, M.M. 2009, ‘Entitled to consume: postfeminist femininity and a culture of
post-critique’, Discourse and Communication, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 371–400.
Lee, S. 2008, Alice in la la land, Random House, Sydney.
Lette, K. 1991, The llama parlour, Pan Macmillan, Chippendale.
Mabry, A.R. 2006, ‘About a girl: female subjectivity and sexuality in con-
temporary “chick” culture’, in S. Ferriss & M. Young (eds), Chick lit: the new
women’s fiction, Routledge, New York, pp. 191–206.
Marston, K. 2018, Postfeminist whiteness: problematising melancholic burden in
contemporary Hollywood, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Mathew, I. 2016, ‘Educating the reader in Anita Heiss’s chick lit’, Contemporary
Women’s Writing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 334–353.
McRobbie, A. 2007, ‘Top girls? Young women and the post-feminist sexual con-
tract’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos. 4–5, pp. 718–737.
McRobbie, A. 2009, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change,
Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
McRobbie, A. 2016, Be creative: making a living in the new culture industries,
Polity, Cambridge.
Middleton, J. 2006, ‘Friends of the poor or of neo-liberalism?’, Socialist Review,
no. 310, October, viewed 30 January 2019, http://socialistreview.org.uk/310/
friends-poor-or-neo-liberalism.
Mißler, H. 2017, The cultural politics of chick lit: popular fiction, postfeminism,
and representation, Routledge, New York.
Morris, M. 1992, Ecstasy and economics: American essays for John Forbes,
Empress, Sydney.
Chick lit 55
Negra, D. 2009, What a girl wants? Fantasizing the reclamation of self in postfem-
inism, Routledge, London.
Negra, D. & Tasker, Y. (eds) 2014, Gendering the recession media and culture in
an age of austerity, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Newns, L. 2018, ‘Renegotiating romantic genres: textual resistance and Muslim
chick lit’, Journal of Commonwealth Literature, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 284–300.
O’Mahony, L. 2018, ‘ “More than sex, shopping, and shoes”: cosmopolitan Indige-
neity and cultural politics in Anita Heiss’s Koori lit’, in E. Hurt (ed.), Theorizing
ethnicity and nationality in the chick lit genre, Routledge, New York, pp. 41–68.
Ommundsen, W. 2011, ‘Sex and the global city: chick lit with a difference’, Con-
temporary Women’s Writing, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 107–124.
Pluhar, E. 2003, Die Wahl, Hoffmann und Campe, Hamburg.
Ponzanesi, S. 2014, The postcolonial cultural industry: icons, markets, mytholo-
gies, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Rowntree, M. 2015, ‘Feminine sexualities in the chick genre: women’s readings
and preferred readings’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 508–521.
Rudd, J. 2010, Campaign Ruby, Text Publishing, Melbourne.
Rudd, J. 2011, Ruby blues, Text Publishing, Melbourne.
Scalmer, S. 2008, ‘Searching for the aspirationals’, Overland, no. 180, pp. 5–9.
Scanlon, J. 2013, ‘What’s an acquisitive girl to do? Chick lit and the great reces-
sion’, Women’s Studies, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 904–922.
Schor, N. 1985, ‘Female fetishism: the case of George Sand’, Poetics Today, vol. 6,
no. 1/2, pp. 301–310.
Smith, C.J. 2008, Cosmopolitan culture and consumerism in chick lit, Routledge,
New York.
Sparrow, R. 2002, The girl most likely: a novel, University of Queensland Press,
St Lucia.
Streeruwitz, M. 2004, Jessica, 30, Fischer, Frankfurt.
Tate, S.A. 2017, ‘Skin: post-feminist bleaching culture and the political vulner-
ability of blackness’, in A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aesthetic labour:
rethinking beauty politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, London,
pp. 199–213.
Taylor, A. 2012, Single women in popular culture: the limits of postfeminism,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Taylor, L. & Uren, D. 2010, Shitstorm: inside Labor’s darkest days, Melbourne
University Publishing, Carlton.
Turner, G. 1993, National fictions: literature, film, and the construction of
Australian narrative, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.
Van Slooten, J.L. 2006, ‘Fashionably indebted: conspicuous consumption, fashion,
and romance in Sophie Kinsella’s Shopaholic trilogy’, in S. Ferriss & M. Young
(eds), Chick lit: the new woman’s fiction, Routledge, New York, pp. 219–238.
Veblen, T. 2002, The theory of the leisure class, IndyPublish, McLean.
Ward, R. 1958, The Australian legend, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
Weisberger, L. 2003, The devil wears Prada, Doubleday, New York.
Weiss, R.P. 2001, ‘Charitable choice as neoliberal social welfare strategy’, Social
Justice, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 35–53.
Wells, J. 2006, ‘Mothers of chick lit? Women writers, readers, and literary history’,
in S. Ferriss & M. Young (eds), Chick lit: the new women’s fiction, Routledge,
New York, pp. 47–70.
56 Chick lit
Whelehan, I. 2000, Overloaded: popular culture and the future of feminism, The
Women’s Press, London.
Whelehan, I. 2005, The feminist bestseller: from Sex and the single girl to Sex and
the city, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Wilson, C.A. 2012, ‘Becky Bloomwood at the V&A: culture, materialism, and the
chick lit novel’, Journal of Popular Culture, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 214–225.
Winch, A. 2013, Girlfriends and postfeminist sisterhood, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Workplace Gender Equality Agency 2016, Gender segregation in Australia’s work-
force, August, Australian government.
Yang, J. 2017, ‘Holistic labour: gender, body and the beauty and wellness industry
in China’, in A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aesthetic labour: rethinking
beauty politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 117–131.
2 Television dramedies
Refiguring gendered intimacy
and postfeminist kinship on the
small screen
Conclusion
While Winners and Losers appears, in some respects, to trouble the hier-
archy of intimacy that privileges sexual and familial ties over other forms
of connection, Offspring relocates family to the heart of sociality even if
the way in which family is ‘done’, as well as what actually constitutes
family, may have altered. The labour involved in maintaining a stable unit
remains, however, deeply gendered, but we have argued that the series
Television dramedies 81
c ritiques such positioning. The semioscape of postfeminist kinship we see
in these programmes aligns with the following comment about intimacy in
the twenty-first century: ‘it makes little sense to claim that people now-
adays have abandoned traditional “families of fate” for “families of choice”
based on friends, since the truth, perhaps unsurprisingly, is more complex’
(Spencer & Pahl 2006, p. 154). As we have argued, both series reveal what
Chambers has termed ‘hybridised familialism’ (2012), offering affective
bonds and networks of sociability that are still very much reliant upon dis-
courses of family (albeit widely conceived) to give them meaning. As their
narrative arcs, various plots, and characters suggest, despite the DIY ethos
co-constitutive of postfeminism and neoliberalism, contemporary Austral-
ian women can’t do it themselves, and without state support (especially in
terms of child-rearing), ‘family’ in the widest sense of the term has become
more not less crucial to women’s being in the world. As with Australian
chick lit, women’s magazines, and self-help manuals, these series, though
perhaps gently and often with humour, point to some of the unfinished
business of second wave feminism, including the gendering of care, rather
than revelling in its ‘pastness’ (Tasker & Negra 2007). They also under-
score how naturalised the Australian women’s movement’s critique of
marriage and nuclear families, and – in the discourse of egalitarianism –
women’s right to a ‘fair go’, in the workplace and in the home, has become
(although our final chapter, as well as the class privilege of the characters
in our dramedies, complicate this somewhat).
Our analysis has shown, like Jorie Lagerwey et al. (2016) in their recent
study of American and British television series such as Homeland and The
Fall, that ‘some established protocols of postfeminist representation are
subsiding’. As they continue, rather than reinscribing familiar retreatist
tropes,
This dynamic can be seen to mark Offspring in particular, though the hos-
pital in Winners and Losers (where Sophie, Sam, Carla and Doug work) as
well as Frances’s law firm are also indicative of the collapse of public/
private boundaries and the material refiguration of the very ‘architectures
of intimacy’ (Filmer 2018).
We have also argued that while coupledom is certainly narratively
important and drives a number of plots, in the semioscape of postfeminist
kinship, relationships between women (i.e. sisterhood, whether literal or
symbolic) are (re)valued and prioritised over romantic intimacies, suggest-
ing interpretive frameworks for women’s rich affective lives that trouble
the valorisation of couple culture. As in Australian chick lit novels, this
82 Television dramedies
represents a significant contrast to American quintessentially postfeminist
dramedies, such as Ally McBeal, in which all forms of relationality come
to be subsumed by the romance narrative and its attendant mononorma-
tivity. While ‘patriarchal pessimists’ lament the supposed loss of a lack of
stability and diversified forms of community, we agree with much feminist
work which suggests that a focus on forms of intimacy beyond ‘conjugal
couples and families’, and especially on friendships, will help to further
destabilise the heterosexual imaginary (Roseneil 2006, p. 338). That said,
although LGBT characters do feature in each series, and as in our other
genres, it is heterosexuality that continues to be normalised.
As we have argued, Offspring and Winners and Losers, through depict-
ing many different forms of intimacy, as well as critiquing re-traditionalised
perspectives, reflect upon a political and representational environment
clearly informed by feminism. Therefore, rather than performing femi-
nism’s disavowal, as is commonly argued of twenty-first-century televisual
texts, especially those dubbed ‘postfeminist’, both these series persistently
‘bring up [questions] about how to function in a world that has only par-
tially achieved feminist goals’ (Hunting 2012, p. 195). In this sense, they
productively intervene in ongoing debates around gender, feminism, and
intimacy in twenty-first-century Australia. In the next chapter, focusing on
Australian women’s magazines, we also find that, although largely
addressed to white, heterosexual, middle-class women, a form of popular
feminism is operative, and works to shape the ‘dreamscapes’ of these texts
in important ways.
Notes
1 More recently, feminist television scholars have expended much energy on how
postfeminism has been updated for millennial subjects, especially via Lena
Dunham’s Girls, populated by heroines simultaneously characterised by a sense
of entitlement and precarity (Nash & Whelehan 2017).
2 As Sue Turnbull argues, apart from policy- and industry-focused studies, ‘the
number of academic books published on Australian television in general, and
specific shows or genres in particular, is minimal’ (2010, p. 116). Remarkably,
there have been no monographs on Australian televisual femininities (or indeed
masculinities), and certainly none on the relationship between feminism, or
even women, and television.
3 For an analysis of how Keddie as celebrity was persistently conflated with
Nina, and how this impacted magazine coverage of its star, see Middlemost
(forthcoming).
4 As the Channel Ten website notes in a section devoted to the series’ interiors:
Geraldine’s house is the heart of the show; it’s the family home, where the
Proudmans grew up. The Offspring team has used this location for seven
seasons; the richly layered and textured home is the perfect backdrop for
the Proudman family.
(‘Offspring’s Interiors: Geraldine’s House’, 13 July 2017, viewed
30 April 2019, https://tenplay.com.au/channel-ten/offspring/
offspring-interiors/offspring-interiors-geraldines-house):
Television dramedies 83
5 Seasons and episodes in these two series are represented in this form: Season
no.: Episode no. (1: 01).
6 Billie is Nina’s elder, less professionally successful, sister; she struggles in her
career and in her relationships. As she notes: ‘Growing up I had this younger
sister who was exceptional, at everything, anything I did, Nina could do better’
(Billie to Jimmy, 3: 02). She herself says to Nina, ‘being around you always
makes me feel like a failure’ (4: 12). Nevertheless, they remain deeply involved
in each other’s lives.
7 Nina learns she is the product of an extra-marital affair; Darcy fathers a
child to her workmate, Cherie; Zara, one of the other nurses she works with,
becomes unexpectedly pregnant (twice) to Nina’s brother, Jimmy; a half-
brother, Will, emerges in Season Six; Billie becomes a kind of surrogate
mother for Brodie, who herself later has a child, for which Billie helps care;
Martin Clegg is the sperm donor for Kim and her partner Renee, a role
which Will comes to take on in Season Seven, for she and Jess; and several
children are born, all delivered by Nina, throughout the seven seasons (Ray,
Cherie and Darcy’s; Stella, Kim and Clegg’s child; Alfie and Paddy, Zara and
Jimmy’s).
8 Extratextually, this aspect of the dramedy was also the subject of meta-
commentary, as Eddie Perfect (who plays Mick, Billie’s husband), noted in an
article he wrote for the Guardian (2014): ‘Offspring really pushed the idea
that we create our own families, that we’re accountable in shaping our own
communities.’
9 Although the Proudmans are certainly not idealised, other families that are
represented are much more troublesome and found comparatively wanting
(Mick’s mum is spiteful and non-supportive; Cherie’s father is a homophobic
religious zealot; Patrick’s father is detached, dismissive, and patronising; Harry’s
father is domineering, moody, and bullying). The representation of all of these
inadequate families serves to underscore the desirability of the Proudman family
connection, dysfunctional though it may often seem.
10 The interwoven nature of work and intimacy (especially familial forms) is also
underscored through Billie’s job; for the first few seasons, she is a real estate
agent at her father’s agency.
11 For example, Season Three maps many awkward post-break-up moments at
the hospital between Nina and Patrick (3: 07), prompting Patrick to move to
the Ainsworth.
12 As ‘a technology of propinquity’, the mobile phone – enacting ‘new erosions
between public and private, work and leisure’ – ensures that intimacy ‘is no
longer a “private” activity but a pivotal component of public sphere performa-
tivity’ (Hjorth & Lim 2012, p. 477).
13 There are other points in the series where the gendering of emotions as fem-
inine is invoked. As Nina tells their couples’ counsellor, reinscribing a tradi-
tional gendered dynamic: ‘I have to talk, he has to shutdown’ (4. 10), and until
his death Patrick is coded as moody and brooding, like a Byronic hero.
14 Significantly, it is the men, not the women, who broach the subject of marriage
and the women who do not feel the need to have state validation of their
romantic relationships. For example, Zara rejects Jimmy’s proposal, though
they eventually do get married – in the hospital – as Zara gives birth to their
second son, Paddy (5: 05). That said, they later separate after unsuccessfully
attempting to negotiate a polyamorous relationship.
15 However, Billie does adopt maternal roles, including helping runaway teen
single mother Brodie with her son and functioning as a substitute mother for
Brodie herself, again detaching maternal care from the biological.
84 Television dramedies
16 Similarly, in Winners and Losers, Season Four, the resolutely child-free Frances
is unexpectedly pregnant but decides to keep the baby. Once George is born,
Frances finds herself bored at home and she returns very shortly after the birth,
a choice that it is entirely normalised (and which, indicative of her class privi-
lege, is also dependent upon her ability to hire a full-time nanny). As she
remarks when she returns to work, ‘Mama’s home … it’s so good to be more
than just a feeder … I may never leave this place [her office] again’ (4: 16) and
after her nanny resigns, ‘If I don’t find someone, I’ll have to stay at home, and I
can’t do that’ (4: 17). Like Nina, Frances, of course, is the most permissible
kind of single mother imaginable.
17 It should also be noted, though, that this scenario would have been un-
representable if not for the presence of her uber supportive partner, Harry (not
insignificantly a professional ‘crisis manager’), who clearly embodies a type of
recoded Australian masculinity (also evidenced by Jimmy): ‘You know, just
because you’re doing one doesn’t mean you can’t do the other … We’d be
doing it together’ (7: 06).
18 Klocker’s 2014 study of ‘inter-ethnic intimacy’ on Australian television offered
‘strong evidence that Australian media representations do not yet reflect the
changing ethnic composition of Australian households and families’ (p. 48).
Her concluding comments are relevant to the series we analyse:
Australian television screens are, for all intents and purposes, still plagued
by whiteness – but not because of a lack of ethnically diverse bodies on-
screen. Rather, their whiteness rests upon the ongoing centring of white
characters and storylines, and the discounting of other possibilities – even
amongst visible inter-ethnic pairs.
(2014, p. 49)
19 Winners and Losers engages with a range of social, political, and health issues
such as mental illness, miscarriage, domestic violence, stalking, alcoholism and
drug addiction, infidelity and divorce, bullying, euthanasia and suicide, abor-
tion, trolling, homophobic violence, gambling addiction, revenge porn, and
grief (though, despite one of the core characters being Asian-Australian, there
is no engagement with racism). Violence against women is a recurrent thematic
preoccupation, perhaps indicative of the raised awareness of it through
Australia’s White Ribbon initiative (JB and Shannon are both stalkers, of Sophie
and Frances respectively; Sam has broken off her engagement to Brett after he hit
her; Sophie is stabbed while in Kenya; and Tiffany is also a victim of domestic
violence).
20 Indicative of her explicit critique of marriage and its privileging throughout,
Frances notes of those attending the reunion: ‘It doesn’t matter how many
letters I have after my name, it’s the Mrs in front of it that counts’ (1: 01).
21 Despite their lottery win, there seems to be no question of them exiting the
labour market – except for Jenny who leaves her call centre position to con-
template wants she wants to do with her life. Employment is figured as an
integral part of women’s identities, arguably marking its indebtedness to
second wave feminism. Frances sells half the management consultancy to
partner Zac, after feeling disillusioned with the politics and ethics of advising
companies to ‘downsize’. She discovers her life’s purpose after representing
Jonathan (Frances’s assistant) and Will (Jenny’s first boyfriend who eventually
comes out) after an incident of homophobic violence, and becomes a criminal
lawyer. Of practising law, ‘fighting for people, helping make a difference,
nothing like it’ (Frances, 5: 06), taking on many pro-bono cases that ‘help the
underdog’ (5: 07). Sophie returns to her medical training, while Jenny returns
to university to retrain as a primary school teacher as a direct response to the
Television dramedies 85
bullying she received (and indeed she returns to Renwood High for her teacher
training and deals with a case of bullying reminiscent of her own, 2: 13). Perhaps
with the exception of small business owner/beautician Bec, also the only one who
did not pursue higher education, each sees their (middle-class) career – as doctor,
lawyer, teacher – as integral to a meaningful life.
22 See Rossiter (2013) for an analysis of the cultural specificities and the affective
differences of the ‘bogan’ from these other forms.
23 She even has a wedding book, kept since childhood, in which she has placed
images and texts relating to her fantasy wedding day.
24 It is also significant that it is Jenny, who – after the failure of one of her
engagements – becomes a victim of revenge porn, prompting the series’ engage-
ment with debates around sexualisation: ‘I thought I was being sexy and
empowered. Turns out I’m just another slut on the internet’ (3: 20). As punish-
ment for this transgression, she loses her teaching job after the pictures come to
circulate amongst students, suggesting that neither the 1950s housewife nor the
postfeminist sexualised subject work for Jenny.
25 Nevertheless, after a brief separation, in the final episode we see a future vision
(in the form of a photograph) of Jenny and Gabe, blissful in San Francisco with
twin daughters. Frances appears with her husband and daughter, in judges’ robes
in front of a court, and Sophie appears by herself at her medical clinic in Kenya.
References
Adkins, L. 2002, Revisions: gender and sexuality in late modernity, Open
University Press, London.
Allan, G. 2008, ‘Flexibility, family, and friendship’, Personal Relationships, vol. 15,
pp. 1–16.
Arrow, M., Baker, J., & Monagle, C. 2017, ‘Introduction’ in M. Arrow, J. Baker, &
C. Monagle (eds), Small screens: essays on contemporary Australian television,
Monash University Press, Melbourne, pp. vii–xii.
Arthurs, J. 2003, ‘Sex and the City and consumer culture: remediating postfeminist
drama’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 83–98.
Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. 1995, The normal chaos of love, Polity, Cambridge.
Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. 2002, Individualization, Sage, London.
Berlant, L. 1998, ‘Intimacy: a special issue, Critical Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 2,
pp. 281–288.
Berlant, L. & Warner, M. 1998, ‘Sex in public’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 2,
pp. 547–566.
Brady, A., Davis, C., & Burns, K. 2016, Mediated sexual citizenship: neoliberal
subjectivities in television culture, Routledge, London.
Brodnik, L. 2017, ‘Against all odds, Offspring just gave us the perfect ending’,
Mamamia, 30 August, viewed 22 April 2019, www.mamamia.com.au/against-
all-odds-offspring-just-gave-us-the-perfect-ending/.
Brooks, K. 1998, ‘Shit Creek: suburbia, abjection and subjectivity in Australian
“grunge” fiction’, Australian Literary Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 87–100.
Budgeon, S. 2006, ‘Friendship and formations of sociality in late modernity: the
challenge of “post traditional intimacy”’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 13,
no. 3, www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/budgeon.html.
Budgeon, S. 2008, ‘Couple culture and the production of singleness’, Sexualities,
vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 301–325.
86 Television dramedies
Budgeon, S. 2011, Third wave feminism and the politics of gender in late moder-
nity, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Burns, B. 2011, ‘Untold tales of the intra-suburban female’, M/C Journal, vol. 14,
no. 4, http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/398.
Butler, J. 2013, ‘For white girls only? Postfeminism and the politics of inclusion’,
Feminist Formations, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–58.
Chambers, D. 2001, Representing the family, Sage, London.
Chambers, D. 2006, New social ties: contemporary connections in a fragmented
society, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Chambers, D. 2012, Sociology of family life, Wiley Blackwell, London.
Devlyn, D. & Vickery, C. 2010, ‘Channel Seven hoping for a winners about
losers’, Herald Sun, 20 September, viewed 22 April 2019, www.heraldsun.com.
au/archive/news/channel-7-hoping-for-a-winner-about-losers/news-story/660ac3
5d13f1f08719428909b3db59dc.
Douglas, S. & Michaels, M. 2005, The mommy myth: the idealization of mother-
hood and how it has undermined all women, Free Press, New York.
Dow, B. 1996, Prime time feminism: television, media culture, and the women’s
movement since 1970, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Dow, B. 2017, ‘Women together, not alone: an alternative feminist legacy for The
Mary Tyler Moore Show’, FLOW Journal, 20 February, www.flowjournal.
org/2017/02/women-together-not-alone/.
Dykes, A.L. 2011, ‘ “And I started wondering …”: voiceover and conversation in
Sex and the City’, Studies in Popular Culture, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 49–66.
Feasey, R. 2012, From happy homemaker to desperate housewives: motherhood
and popular television, Anthem Press, London.
Fielding, H. 1996, Bridget Jones’s diary, Picador, London.
Filmer, J. 2018, ‘Geographies of intimacy: queer (re)configurations of cultural
space’, unpublished conference paper, 12th Crossroads in Cultural Studies Con-
ference, Shanghai, 12–15 August 2018.
Friedan, B. 1963, The feminine mystique, Penguin, New York.
Geller, J. 2001, Here comes the bride: women, weddings and the marriage mys-
tique, Four Walls, Eight Windows, New York.
Genz, S. 2009, Postfemininities in popular culture, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Genz, S. & Brabon, B.A. 2009, Postfeminisms, Edinburgh University Press,
Edinburgh.
Gerhard, J. 2005, ‘Sex and the City: Carrie Bradshaw’s queer postfeminism’, Fem-
inist Media Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 37–49.
Giddens, A. 1991, The transformation of intimacy, Polity, London.
Gill, R. 2007, ‘Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility’, European
Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–166.
Gill, R. 2016, ‘Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times’,
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 610–630.
Greer, G. 1970, The female eunuch, Palladin, London.
Gregg, M. 2011, Work’s intimacy, Polity, London.
Gross, N. 2005, ‘The detraditionalization of intimacy reconsidered’, Sociological
Theory, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 286–311.
Hamad, H. 2018, ‘The one with the feminist critique: revisiting millennial postfem-
inism with Friends’, Television and New Media, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 692–707.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. 2009, Commonwealth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Television dramedies 87
Havas, J. & Sulimma, M. 2018, ‘Through the gaps of my fingers: genre, feminin-
ity, and cringe aesthetics in dramedy television’, Television and New Media,
doi.org/10.1177/1527476418777838.
Heath, S. 2004, ‘Peer-shared households, quasi-communes and neo-tribes’, Current
Sociology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 161–179.
Henderson, M. 1998, ‘Subdivisions of suburbia: the politics of place in Melissa
Lucashenko’s Steam pigs and Amanda Lohrey’s Camille’s bread’, Australian Lit-
erary Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 72–86.
Henderson, M. 2013, ‘A celebratory feminist aesthetics in postfeminist times’,
Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 28, no. 77, pp. 250–262.
Hjorth, L. & Lim, S.S. 2012, ‘Mobile intimacy in an age of affective mobile
media’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 477–484.
Hochschild, A.R. 1984, The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling,
University of California Press, Los Angeles.
Horbury, A. 2014, ‘Post-feminist impasses in popular heroine television’, Contin-
uum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 213–225.
Hunter, L. 2012, ‘Motherhood, prime time TV, and Grey’s Anatomy’, in
E. Podneiks (ed.), Mediating moms: mothers in popular culture, McGill-Queens
University Press, Montreal, pp. 320–338.
Hunting, K. 2012, ‘Women talk: chick lit TV and the dialogues of feminism’, The
Communication Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 187–203.
Ingraham, C. 1999, White weddings: romancing heterosexuality in popular
culture, Routledge, New York.
Jackson, S. 2011, ‘More winners than losers in this duo’s resume’, Australian,
21 March, viewed 5 May 2019, Factiva.
Jamieson, J. 1999, ‘Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the “pure” relation-
ship’, Sociology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 477–494.
Kean, J. 2015, ‘A stunning plurality: unravelling hetero- and mononormativities
through HBO’s Big love’, Sexualities, vol. 18, no. 5–6, pp. 698–713.
Kim, L. 2001, ‘ “Sex and the Single Girl” in postfeminism: the F word on tele-
vision’, Television and Media, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 319–334.
Klocker, N. 2014, ‘Ethnic diversity within Australian homes: has television caught
up to social reality?’ Journal of Intercultural Studies, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 34–52.
Lagerwey, J., Leyda, J., & Negra, D. 2016, ‘Female-centred TV in an age of pre-
carity’, Genders, vol. 1, no. 1, viewed 20 April 2019, www.colorado.edu/
genders/2016/05/19/female-centered-tv-age-precarity.
Lahad, K. 2017, Table for one: a critical reading of singlehood, gender and time,
Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Lake, M. 1999, Getting equal: the history of Australian feminism, Monash Univer-
sity Press, Melbourne.
Lambert, A. 2013, Intimacy and friendship on Facebook, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Leonard, S. 2010, Fatal attraction, Blackwell, London.
Lotz, A.D 2006, Redesigning women: television after the network era, University
of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL.
Mabry, A.R. 2006, ‘About a girl: female subjectivity and sexuality in con-
temporary “chick” culture’, in S. Ferriss & M. Young (eds), Chick lit: the new
woman’s fiction, Routledge, New York, pp. 191–206.
Maguire, S. (dir.) 2001, Bridget Jones’s Diary, Working Title Films, Los Angeles, CA.
88 Television dramedies
McManus, B. 2011, ‘Winners & Losers, Tuesday, June 21’, Sydney Morning Herald,
21 June, viewed 20 April 2019, www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/
winners-losers-tuesday-june-21-20110616-1g5e0.html.
McRobbie, A. 2009, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change,
Sage, London.
McRobbie, A. 2013, ‘Feminism, the family and the new “mediated” maternalism’,
new formations: a journal of culture/theory/politics, vol. 80–81, pp. 119–137.
Middlemost, R. forthcoming, ‘ “Australian TV’s Golden Girl”: Asher Keddie, Off-
spring, and the celebrity motherhood narrative’, in A. Taylor & J. McIntyre
(eds), Gender and Australian celebrity culture, Routledge, London.
Middlemost, R. 2019, ‘The Nina Effect: Offspring and the commodification of fan
affect’, in C. Lam & J. Raphael (eds), Australian fandom: online, offline, and
transcultural spaces, University of Iowa Press, Iowa, IA.
Mintz, L.E. 1999, ‘American humor as unifying and divisive’, Humor, vol. 12, no. 3,
pp. 237–252.
Moreton-Robinson, A. 2000, Talkin’ up to the white woman, University of Queens-
land Press, St Lucia.
Morgan, D.H.J. 2011, Rethinking family practices, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Nash, M. & Whelehan, I. (eds) 2017, Reading Girls: feminism, postfeminism,
authenticity and gendered performance in contemporary television, Palgrave
Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Negra, D. 2004, ‘ “Quality postfeminism”: sex and the single girl on HBO’,
Genders, vol. 39, viewed 29 April 2019, www.colorado.edu/ gendersarch
ive1998-2013/2004/04/01/quality-postfeminism-sex-and-single-girl-hbo.
Negra, D. 2009, What a girl wants? Fantasising the reclamation of self in postfemi-
nism, Routledge, New York.
Offspring 2010–2017, Endemol Australia, Network Ten.
Pahl, R.E. 2000, On friendship, Polity, Oxford.
Perfect, E. 2014, ‘Eddie Perfect on Offspring a show made by, and about, women’,
The Guardian, 8 August. www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/aug/08/eddie-
perfect-offspring-by-about-strong-women-australia.
Press, A. 1991, Women watching television: gender, class, and generation in the
American television experience, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Probyn, E. 1990, ‘New traditionalism and post-feminism: TV does the home’, Screen,
vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 147–159.
Ringrose, J. & Renold, E. 2010, ‘Normative cruelties and gender deviants: the per-
formative effects of bully discourses for girls and boys in school’, British Educa-
tional Research Journal, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 573–596.
Roseneil, S. 2006, ‘Foregrounding friendship: feminist pasts, feminist futures’, in
M. Evans & J. Lorber (eds), The gender and women’s studies handbook, Sage,
London, pp. 322–341.
Roseneil, S. 2009, ‘Intimate counter-normativities: a queer analysis of personal life
in the early twenty-first century’, in N. Gifley & M. O’Rourke (eds), The
Ashgate research companion to queer theory, Ashgate, London, pp. 397–411.
Roseneil, S. & Budgeon, S. 2004, ‘Cultures of intimacy and care beyond “the
family”: personal life and social change in the early 21st century’, Current Soci-
ology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 135–159.
Rossiter, P. 2013, ‘Bogans: a sticky subject’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cul-
tural Studies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 80–92.
Television dramedies 89
Rottenberg, C. 2018, The rise of neoliberal feminism, Oxford University Press,
New York.
Sandberg, S. 2013, Lean in: women, work and the will to succeed, Alfred A. Knopf,
New York.
Sandell, J. 1998, ‘I’ll be there for you: friends and the fantasy of alternative family’,
American Studies, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 141–155.
Sidel, R. 2006, Unsung heroines: single mothers and the American dream, Univer-
sity of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Smart, C. 2007, Personal life: new directions in sociological thinking, Polity,
London.
Spencer, L. & Pahl, R.E. 2006, Rethinking friendship: hidden solidarities today,
Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Springer, K. 2007, ‘Divas, evil black bitches, and bitter black women: African
American women in postfeminist and post-civil-rights popular culture’, in
Y. Tasker & D. Negra (eds), Interrogating postfeminism: gender and the politics
of popular culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 249–276.
Tasker Y. & Negra, D. 2007, ‘Introduction: feminist politics and postfeminist
culture’, in Y. Tasker & D. Negra (eds), Interrogating postfeminism: gender and
the politics of popular culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 1–25.
Taylor, A. 2012, Single women in popular culture: the limits of postfeminism,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Taylor, A. 2016, Celebrity and the feminist blockbuster, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Turnbull, S. 2010, ‘Missing in action: on the invisibility of (most) Australian tele-
vision’, Critical Studies in Television, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 111–121.
Tyler, I. 2008, ‘ “Chav mum chav scum”: Class disgust in contemporary Britain’,
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17–34.
Valdivia, A.N. 1998, ‘Clueless in Hollywood: single moms in contemporary family
movies’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 272–292.
Vavrus, M.D. 2007, ‘Opting out moms in the news: selling new traditionalism in
the new millennium’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–63.
Wallworth, G. 2018, ‘Traversing the boundaries of the New Momism: challenging
the “good” mother myth in The handmaid’s tale (2017–) and Big little lies
(2017–)’, Honours Thesis, Department of Gender and Cultural Studies, Univer-
sity of Sydney.
Winch, A. 2013, Girlfriends and postfeminist sisterhood, Palgrave Macmillan, Bas-
ingstoke.
Winners and Losers 2011–2016, Seven Productions, Seven Network.
‘Winners & Losers, Tuesday April 12’, Age, viewed 20 April 2019 www.theage.
com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/winners-losers-tuesday-april-12-20110407-
1d5ia.html.
Wood, H. & Taylor, L. 2008, ‘Feeling sentimental about television and audiences’,
Cinema Journal, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 144–151.
3 Women’s magazines
Dreamscapes of postfeminist
abundance
Semioscape as dreamscape
We argue that the textual form of women’s magazines, what we term a
‘dreamscape’, is central to its semioscape of abundance. Indeed, a con-
sideration of the specific form of magazine textuality seems missing or
downplayed in scholarly accounts of women’s magazines, and hence is
another factor that produces critical pessimism. We use dreamscape in
both a Freudian and more informal sense. Women’s magazines are prim-
arily spaces of feminine pleasure, as suggested by readers’ comments that
magazine reading is a reward or guilty pleasure (Ytre-Arne 2011, p. 219).
These pleasures are manifested in a discrete textual tableaux constructed
by its three elements of text, visuals, and advertising, where fantasies (and
accordingly anxieties) are freely played out, and where the anxieties of the
external or real world are disguised or veiled. As Janice Winship (1991,
p. 148) notes, drawing on Dick Hebdige’s work, ‘As a mix of the prosaic
and the utopian and as small treats women buy themselves, are they not a
94 Women’s magazines
screen on to which so much inchoate yearning and desire are projected?’ In
this sense, magazines are the assumed dreams of women readers and, as
Sigmund Freud noted of dreams (1999, p. 97), are a space of wish fulfil-
ment. We say assumed because, regardless of the increasing sophistication
and impact of audience lifestyle research techniques used by women’s
magazines from the 1980s onwards, the fact that certain titles fail to
attract readership and close down (Grazie, Cleo, HQ, amongst others)
suggests that the psychographics now used are not failsafe.7 Our reading of
magazines as dreamscapes extends and complicates Roland Barthes’
(1985) reading of the fashion system constructed in magazines, in which
objects are translated into the language of magazines. Our titles are textual
wish fulfilment, articulating dreams via the language of the glossies. As
dreams, these are open to interpretation.
As a dreamscape the magazine is also an assemblage: a particular and
characteristic way of arranging contents and reading practices. The dream-
scape adequately captures the peculiar logic or grammar of women’s maga-
zines, and goes some way to explaining their contradictory, indeed,
schizoid nature that cannot be explained only by the attempt to address
multiple readerships (Moeran 2006, pp. 727–728): how an intelligent
article on domestic violence, for instance, is placed on the opposite page to
an advertisement for perfume in which the woman’s face appears badly
bruised (‘Women of the World Fight Back!’ and an advertisement for Gucci
eau de parfum, in Marie Claire December 2012, pp. 66–67). The magazine
as dreamscape uses the same processes Freud identified in the dream-work:
condensation, displacement, considerations of representability – the trans-
formation of thoughts into images, and secondary revision (Laplanche &
Pontalis 1973, p. 125). The dreamscape enables the magazine to maintain
coherence in the face of juxtaposition, excess, or dissonance – indeed, it
uses these elements to express and/or enable the assumed latent wish(es) of
readers (and producers and advertisers).
A particular reading practice is elicited and privileged by this dream-
scape form: women’s magazines attempt to construct a reader who sus-
pends disbelief so that the sometimes excessive or incongruous images and
articles can be processed – its codes of largely visual excess announce to
the reader a particular textual space. Similarly, Brian Moeran (2017, p. 3)
argues that fashion magazines attempt to enchant the reader into desiring
the commodities on display. Likewise, the dreamscape solicits a reader
who can easily move in and out of this space – as enacted in the practice of
flicking through magazines or reading one article while waiting in the doc-
tor’s surgery (what Winship [1991, p. 142] refers to as the ‘dip in and dip
out’ style of magazine consumption). And, like our dreams when we sleep,
how much of a magazine is ever remembered, at least consciously? Rather,
as Brita Ytre-Arne notes, reading the magazine can be a brief break from
everyday responsibilities (2011, p. 219) – a type of daydream. Moreover,
Freud’s distinction between the manifest and latent content of dreams also
Women’s magazines 95
suggests the possibility of a critical interpretive practice – one that we
adopt.
We argue that the material and emotional abundance that characterises
every title’s dreamscape is a class and racial fantasy. As we show, each
dreamscape is a condensation and displacement of the pressures primarily
confronting contemporary white Australian women, for, as we discuss
below, the world of these magazines is unrelentingly, unself-consciously,
and hence invisibly, white (Moreton-Robinson 2000). The multitude of
things on offer and the aspirations they represent articulate changes in
women’s lives – the ability to work and be educated, to choose not to
marry and not to be a mother – but also the uneven benefits of second
wave feminism and of the deregulated Australian economy (see Yeatman
1990; Lake 1999; Pusey 2003), providing a fantasy of women’s equal
access to national wealth. As we saw in Australian chick lit, this abun-
dance of things and beauty is the appealing window dressing for that same
system, and simultaneously figures the terms for women’s participation in
the public and private spheres. The whiteness of the dreamscape promises
a consumption-based social integration in an increasingly multicultural
Australia for non-Anglo-European women, while the almost complete
absence of Indigenous women is an unconscious articulation of their con-
tinuing material and symbolic dispossession.8 Thus, and as we saw in chick
lit, postfeminist culture materialises the myth of white Australian egalit-
arianism into an abundance of things for women. We first examine two
archetypal postfeminist magazines, Cleo and Cosmopolitan, to see how
this abundance is figured for mainstream young women, the paradigmatic
postfeminist subjects in many accounts.
Section: features
Cover stories
Features
Reportage: From legalizing same-sex marriage to the tragedy of the Syrian war,
we look at the events that shaped 2015
Fashion report: How the Australians behind Ralph & Russo went from a single
sewing machine to couture behemoth
US Report: Is paying a stranger for a hug the new therapy craze or just a bit crazy?
World report: How one couple put their fortune on the line to save thousands of
refugees from drowning at sea
Frankly Speaking with Rachel Zoe: The American stylist to the stars shares her
views on fashion, feuding and family
Crime report: ‘The day I found out my father was a serial killer’
World Wrap: The heroine teacher of the Sandy Hook massacre relives the horror,
and the Indian village where women rule the roost
@Play: Music, movies and more …
Life stories: She sold half a billion books and bedded Marlon Brando, but Jackie
Collins’s life was also marred by adversity
Remaining Sections: Fashion, Beauty, Wellness, @Work, Promotions, Lifestyle:
Treasure Island: The owners of a tiny patch of paradise off the Tasmanian coast
are sharing their luxury getaway; Eat, Drink, and Be Merry: Set a simple scene
this festive season and celebrate good food in relaxed Australian style
increases the impact and readability of the verbal: features are grouped
together and are set out in an uncluttered style, without being interrupted
by graphics. As a result, one can ‘read’ the magazine, if desired, or
immerse oneself in the pages of beautiful clothes and other commodities.
Such a layout suggests a relative degree of intellectualism – there is sub-
stance here, even if we choose just to look at the pictures.
Style, and a specifically restrained type at that, is the dominant element
in the dreamscape and its overarching world view: as those opening adver-
tisements announce, this is an abundantly beautiful world. Our cosmopol-
itan femininity is founded on a style for living, where everyday activities of
femininity – often seen as drudgery – are transformed into an aesthetic
practice and space to announce an understated good taste. So, rather than
104 Women’s magazines
the postfeminist trope of the struggling woman, attempting, with difficulty,
to ‘have it all’ (Genz 2010, p. 120), we have the postfeminist woman of
style, and hence accomplishment. Thus, Marie Claire’s recipe pages, most
famously overseen by Donna Hay (the best-selling Australian cookbook
author), are upmarket but simple recipes with carefully staged accompanying
photographs: the meal as art. Home decorating becomes intellectualised and
aestheticised into interior design, with the homes of the famous and taste-
ful used as our guide, a process Negra terms ‘domestic aggrandizement’
(2009, p. 118). What to wear is equated with designer labels of clothes
and accessories; make-up and shampoo are also high-end brands, fre-
quently bearing exotic and/or European names (‘MonoDerma’, ‘Klorane’,
‘Clinique’). And note the dearth of articles on sex or relationship advice:
Marie Claire assumes this has been sorted.
As a consequence, and consistent with postfeminism as it manifests else-
where, Marie Claire’s style requires high-end consumption, or at least, this
desire – the second element in her dreamscape. This is a world based not
so much on the scale of consumption found in Cosmo-Cleo, but on the
type of consumption: luxury meaning exoticism. The modifier ‘luxury’
makes this consumption both more desirable and more acceptable. The
litany of European and American luxury brands (Tommy Hilfiger, Coach,
Bally) that fill Marie Claire’s pages seems to obscure and hence transcend
the commodity to which they are attached, and their exclusivity and exoti-
cism makes them more akin to an art work. They take the consumer ‘else-
where’ – geographically and socially. To purchase these (or to desire to
purchase them) is a mark of aesthetic and hence social distinction
(Bourdieu 2007, p. 280).
Although Cleo and Cosmopolitan made holidays part of the Cosmo-
Cleo girl’s world – often at the Australian beachside – Marie Claire has
moved on, and, as a consequence, international travel is the realm for
leisure: a key marker of her cosmopolitan, and high disposable income,
perspective. International and luxury travel is taken for granted (the shop-
ping trip to Dubai, or ski-ing in Vail, for example), and is another form of
encountering the exotic, adding to her cultural capital.17 Rather than signi-
fying aspirationalism, it is more accurate to see the Marie Claire dream-
scape as textualising the various types of mobility required for feminine
cosmopolitanism: physical, cultural, intellectual, and psychic (Skrbis &
Woodward 2013, p. 15). This dreamscape is about going and being else-
where, as physical travel replicates, expresses, and reinforces the social and
cultural mobility underpinning post-Fordism. In addition, a desire for
exotic landscapes forms an important source of Marie Claire’s various
realms of style, consumption, and especially fashion. That one little detail
imported from elsewhere found in its various photo spreads – the piece of
jewellery that completes the outfit, the type of hemp used in the outdoor
chair – is another marker of distinction, functioning as a signifier of
authentic cultural knowledge.
Women’s magazines 105
Marie Claire, however, is not all about abundant consumption, and
indeed confounds Gough-Yates’s assertion that women’s magazines should
never mention the world of work (2003, p. 96). While not a major part of
its contents, work does feature regularly and is represented as career;
indeed, it publishes a special ‘Women at Work’ issue in February 2013 and
organises a ‘Success at Work’ summit in late 2014 (reported in the January
2015 issue). Marie Claire treats the world of work seriously and women as
workers seriously: work is a source of discrimination and harassment for
women (see Marinos 1999). Regardless, women are represented as leaders
in their fields and as deserving to lead (see advice on women and leader-
ship in the January 2015 issue). Given the importance of women and work
to the Australian women’s movement, we should not be surprised to see
such a commitment expressed in Marie Claire’s pages.
Furthermore, there is an implicit sense that work makes feminine cos-
mopolitanism possible, a causality suggested in the regular articles on
designer workwear. Unlike the glamorous fashion or media industry
careers idealised by Cosmo-Cleo and that characterise chick lit, Marie
Claire includes a broader and more realistic range of women’s occupations
in the ‘Exceptional woman’ type story. Thus the special ‘Women at Work’
issue (February 2013) features ten middle-class career women, including
Peta Credlin (then Prime Minister Abbott’s Chief of Staff), lawyers, finan-
cial planners, food exporters, and a philanthropy fund administrator.
Most significantly, and as we observed in the previous chapter, work is
seen as simply part of being a woman. Equally significant is that mother-
hood, families, and intimate relationships are of only very minor interest,
and the readers are rarely addressed in such terms. Marie Claire’s cosmo-
politan woman is autonomous.
One of Marie Claire’s most distinctive and crucial features is its consist-
ent interest in an internationalist version of feminist politics: an articu-
lation of its ethical cosmopolitanism that reinscribes the whiteness of its
ideal subject. Every issue contains at least one feature article on the treat-
ment of women (and often children) in developed or developing nations,
thus Marie Claire’s feminism blends a global social justice perspective with
its founding feminist humanism and cosmopolitan world view. The feature
articles in the January 1998 issue indicate the contours of Marie Claire’s
cosmopolitan feminism, with articles on Islam’s female army, a rape victim
being jailed in Pakistan, women ‘ecowarriors’, and a biography of Marilyn
Monroe. December 2007 includes a story on female Kurdish guerrillas and
one on Australian foreign aid guidelines that prohibit birth control. The
magazine also combines this internationalism with a local perspective; the
October 2008 issue contains articles on women being overly critical of
each other, a Columbian female political activist, the local ‘Fitted for
Work’ campaign, the international designers with an environmental con-
science, and a biography of Coco Chanel. There has also been a consistent
interest in women’s reproductive freedoms locally and internationally
106 Women’s magazines
(Corbett 2001; Haworth 2002; Dabscheck 2005), and domestic violence
(Goodwin 2000; Renkert 2001; Bobrow & Hawkins 2002; Robinson &
Dabscheck 2005).
While genuine and well-intentioned, Marie Claire’s cosmopolitan fem-
inism has attracted criticism, specifically for its representational politics
(Vrana 2007–2008). Gill argues, for instance, that
Although The Weekly has attracted much scholarly attention throughout its
history, how it engages with a postfeminist context remains unaddressed.
Unlike our previous magazines’ relatively minor emphasis on the domestic
in favour of the autonomous working female consumer, The Weekly con-
tinues its historical focus on a pragmatic domestic femininity, and in its
contemporary manifestation thereby offers readers a dreamscape of
domestic plenitude – an Australian version of the postfeminist re-embrace
of domesticity (Hollows 2006; Genz 2009). That said, we argue The
Weekly confounds this narrative as well. This plenitude involves two
senses: first, in the overarching role that the domestic plays in the maga-
zine’s textual spaces; and second, in that the domestic space offers so
much: wishes can be met, problems ameliorated, and the self can be ful-
filled. Domestic plenitude, therefore, promises contentment arising from
many women’s reality, where, because of the conservatism of Australian
gender roles, the domestic is still primarily a space for women’s unpaid
labour and making of the self, but also for working women who do not
have time to be domestic enough.21
This dreamscape does not, however, simply reflect a social conservatism
regarding women’s ‘proper’ place. Rather, domestic plenitude in The
Weekly’s terms marks historical change in Australian women’s lives rather
Women’s magazines 109
than stagnation. Specifically, domestic plenitude reveals the historical and
political pressures on ordinary (i.e. white working-class and lower-middle-
class) women’s domesticity whether they are in paid employment or not –
including time and income pressures, the pressures of aspirational style,
and female-headed households. The postfeminist Weekly is an attempt to
both integrate social (primarily feminist) change, and to conserve elements
of traditional white Australian femininity and national identity: specifi-
cally, egalitarianism – now extended to women – and a valorisation of ‘the
ordinary’.
Ironically, given that housewife/homemaker magazines have often been
considered bastions of conservative notions of femininity, the postfeminist
iteration of The Weekly constructs a particularly Australian domesticity
that avoids the excesses of the two key motifs that structure postfeminist
accounts of domesticity: domestic goddess mythologies and the narrative
of ‘retreatism’, in which ‘the professional, urban woman … returns to her
[idealized] hometown’ (Negra 2009, p. 15). (In The Weekly, this would be
a retreat towards the ‘old’ – read Anglo-Celt, pre-women’s movement –
Australia.) In The Weekly’s terms, the domestic is gently modernised into a
form of domestic feminism, rather than being retro-ised, hyperbolised, or
ossified. Thus, it provides an alternative to the consumerist and trans-
national aspirational dreamscapes offered by Cosmo-Cleo and Marie-
Claire. The Weekly is also evidence of a strongly Australian version of ‘the
new domestic femininities’ that Joanne Hollows (2006, p. 105) argues
emerge in the postfeminist historical space, in which the old binaries of the
feminist and the housewife, the career woman and the homemaker, and
the public and the private spheres, are no longer stable (Genz 2009,
pp. 53–54). The core elements of domestic plenitude are the traditional
content of The Weekly throughout its history (Sheridan et al. 2002, p. 1):
marriage, motherhood, family, and the home; however, these become
more liberally defined, though still focused on heterosexual white women.
As in our dramedies, de facto relationships are now legitimate, as are
women who work, or women without children. These core elements
inform the narrative and interpretive frames used by The Weekly: most
stories are constructed within their parameters, and they are the recipe for
plenitude.
The Weekly, like the other titles discussed here, regularly features the
‘exceptional woman’ type story or the celebrity story.22 Its difference is
that the exceptional woman’s identity as a wife or mother is given promi-
nence (the journalist, Jana Wendt is one such example, see Sheather 2005),
or the celebrity’s family background is foregrounded (as in the actor,
Rebecca Gibney’s childhood with an alcoholic father; see ‘Shadows of the
Past’ [2003]), or the retired champion athlete’s serious romance is now the
focal point for The Weekly’s interest (the champion Olympic swimmer,
Susie O’Neil’s courtship story, [see George 1998]). High achieving and/or
unconventional women are simultaneously recognised for their achievement
110 Women’s magazines
and reframed, that is, literally domesticated. In this process, their ‘special-
ness’ and unattainable lifestyle are translated into ‘ordinary’ women’s
reality and are therefore made accessible and comprehensible to them. This
extraordinary/ordinary dialectic (Dyer 1979; Turner 2004) is, of course,
constitutive of celebrity, but has especial valence in the Australian context
with its egalitarian and masculinist mythologies. Women celebrities, in par-
ticular, face intensified scrutiny in the postfeminist era, playing a ‘role in
testing dominant social norms’ and re-establishing conventional definitions
of gender (Holmes & Negra 2011, p. 3). In The Weekly’s contemporary
blend of relatively traditional models of female subjectivity, feminine egal-
itarianism, and a slightly increased celebrity focus, these women are re-
feminised, made just like ordinary white women, and equally importantly,
reinforce domesticity as a site of contentment, of plenitude.
What we term the ‘white Australian celebrity comeback story’ reveals
the critical importance of marriage, motherhood, and the home in con-
structing a normative model of a woman’s life course whose goal, or at
least touchstone, is domestic contentment, regardless of what career or life
path one chooses. Given its explicitly Australian focus, The Weekly’s pre-
ferred model of celebrity is the Australian ex-celebrity, as in the soapie star
from the 1980s (say, Rowena Wallace) or the Young Talent Time singer
(think Tina Arena). The Weekly loves to cover their post-fame lives, as they
either accede to conventional womanhood (having a baby or marriage) or
battle and overcome personal crises (divorce, stillbirth, illness, career col-
lapse, weight gain). Sometimes their destination is a tentative career come-
back. Regardless of its outcome, at its core the celebrity comeback story
celebrates the white female Aussie battler – no matter how famous – and
the domestic milestones in a conventional woman’s life (even if these go
wrong, at least the celebrity had a go at being ‘normal’). So for Dannii
Minogue: ‘Nobody imagined that Dannii would be so revolutionised by
pregnancy and motherhood’ (Iley 2011). For ex-soapie star Peta Toppano:
In the past, her photo shoots would have been done on film sets or in
one of the luxurious mansions she shared with her then husband. This
time, it’s held in her red-brick, two-bedroom flat, not far from the
house where her parents lived for more than 20 years. The block itself
is modest, but Peta has turned her flat into a colourful, cosy home,
decorating the walls with old playbills, photographs and a portrait of
herself painted for the Archibald Prize.
(Baker 2011)
Conclusion
By positioning them as dreamscapes, as textualised forms of wish fulfil-
ment, we have been able to draw out the potential of postfeminist
women’s magazines. As we have demonstrated, the semioscape of abun-
dance suggests the pleasures on offer to, and conflicts faced by, con-
temporary Australian women. In addition, we argue that there is cause for
optimism concerning Australian women’s magazines in postfeminist times.
Although the abundance on display continues the traditional and pejora-
tive association of women with consumerism, we read such abundance not
as a sign of women’s putative frivolity, but rather as a marker of con-
temporary women’s relative emancipation. Hedonistic and luxury con-
sumption as imagined in these magazines signals increased economic and
subjective freedom for Australian women. To desire excessively, to spend,
to waste, are marks of freedom so long allowed only to men. It is far too
easy to dismiss or criticise such dreams rather than seeing them as textual-
ising an historically monumental shift.
As Freud identified, however, dreams arise out of the conflicts of our
waking lives, therefore our titles, being dreamscapes, will exhibit some
strange if not contradictory features (much like postfeminism itself). The
way in which the various dreamscapes are partially but continually inter-
rupted by those stories from ‘the real’ (as in the anorexic model, the victim
of domestic violence, the gender pay gap, the career woman who is prim-
arily a mum), testify to the contradictions facing Australian women and
inherent to such a model of prosthetic femininities. The various dream-
scapes articulate some of the class and age-specific compensations avail-
able to Australian women with which to deal with these contradictions:
young women’s sexual hedonism of Cosmo-Cleo, Marie Claire’s mature
woman’s quest for exotic distinction and cosmopolitan social justice, and
the domestic pragmatics and fulfilment of The Weekly for a broad and
older readership.
Regardless of the degree to which the Australian context is acknow-
ledged, all the magazines are relentlessly about and for white women.
While they like to appear up to date or in advance of social trends, and
have shifted to address changes in white women’s lives, the world of Aus-
tralian women’s magazines remains largely oblivious to Australia’s multi-
cultural or postcolonial nature. We surmise that such a repression suggests
two related things. First, hegemonic middle-class whiteness announces
itself as the ideal for non-Western women, whether in the emerging middle
classes or the working classes that produce so many of Australia’s con-
sumer commodities and services. For Australian Indigenous women, their
Women’s magazines 115
highly restricted participation in these worlds of beauty and things is both
a repression and an accurate reflection of their ongoing dispossession. And
second, the fashion industry (and its close sister, the manufacturer of con-
sumer goods) relies on the exploitation of non-white women’s labour –
both locally (as piece workers, for instance) and internationally – as
McRobbie notes in the UK context (1999, p. 60). Their effacement in the
dreamscape is the women’s magazines’ version of secondary revision.
For highly commercial genres – as McRobbie puts it, ‘Their business is,
in effect, the nature of womanhood’ (1999, p. 48) – they show an ability
to be more feminist than many other commercial genres, and complicate
feminism’s traditional antagonism to women’s magazines (Friedan 1963;
Greer 1970; Ferguson 1983), and its problem with the genre’s postfeminist
iteration. Most surprising is the way in which feminist tenets are taken for
granted but also explicitly articulated by every title: women are equal to
men, women should be able to do anything they wish with their lives, and
women are still subject to systemic discrimination, and it will take activism
to change this. In this regard, although McRobbie argues that postfeminist
culture takes feminism for granted in order to disavow it, every title expli-
citly claims itself to be feminist and a champion of women’s causes. More-
over, there is no sense of the irrelevancy or pastness of feminism: all
magazines are far more political and socially aware than expected and
have run campaigns and uncompromising articles on feminist issues
throughout the 20 years: anti-domestic violence, sexual violence, paid
maternity leave, sexual harassment, and equal pay. The semioscape of
magazines is therefore evidence of the potential of popular feminism.
Indeed, we happily claim them as mainstream feminist publications, well
aware of their limitations, but optimistic about their potential. Like Shelley
Budgeon and Dawn Currie (1995, p. 184), therefore, ‘we view these texts
as actively constructing a discourse which draws upon, and in so doing
transforms, public understandings of feminism’. In the next chapter, we
turn to the obvious successor to women’s lifestyle magazines: the digital
‘glossies’ of the beauty vlogs and their semioscape of postfeminist confi-
dence, care, and self-empowerment, and the particular intimate publics
that they bring into being.
Notes
1 Women’s magazines are still popular, attracting between 269,000 (Cosmopol-
itan) to over 1.5 million readers (The Australian Women’s Weekly), per print
issue (source: Roy Morgan, September 2018), with much larger readerships for
their cross platform editions. For example, Marie Claire’s readership increases
from 379,000 readers of the May 2017 print issue to 464,000 readers for its
cross platform version (Source: emma readership survey: www.emma.com.au/
reports).
2 There have been some excellent general analyses of certain Australian women’s
magazines such as those by Bonner and McKay (2000), Le Masurier (2007,
116 Women’s magazines
2009, 2011), Sha and Kirkman (2009), Schneider and Davis (2010), and Campo
(2010).
3 This generalist criterion thereby excludes specialist women’s titles such as
Women’s Health and Fitness Australia or gossip/celebrity magazines like Who.
The date range also excludes relatively idiosyncratic titles such as HQ maga-
zine, a publication that did attempt briefly to be a very different sort of
women’s magazine that did not include beauty or fashion articles. Its short
publication span (1990–2003) and a shift towards a male as well as female
readership exclude it from our discussion.
4 Sadly, Cleo ceased publication in March 2016. In her final editorial, Lucy
E. Cousins declares that ‘Australia is home to incredible women from all walks
of life, and we all want to be heard because we all have important things to
say’ (2016, p. 7).
5 We note with interest the success of the alternative Frankie magazine (started
in 2004). However, our focus on mainstream publications, as well as the cen-
trality of young women’s glossies typified by Cosmopolitan to postfeminist
culture and theory precludes Frankie’s inclusion.
6 We do acknowledge Hermes’ finding of the lack of correlation between a read-
er’s lifestyle and chosen magazines (1995, p. 144).
7 Gough-Yates (2003), citing Sean Nixon (1996), explains the impact of psycho-
graphic research on market research thus:
Lifestyle research represented consumers as more diverse and changeable
than ever before, and produced more individualistic images of them. More-
over, lifestyle research emphasised the differences between consumer groups
in cultural, as well as economic and motivational terms.
(p. 2)
For McRobbie (1999, p. 60), the impact on magazines is that:
‘readers’ exist as much as concepts and strategies as they do as active con-
sumers … Instead of being at the far end of the chain which begins with
production, the practices of consumption are built into the ‘front end’ pro-
cesses of production.
8 Such an interpellation becomes important in a context of accelerated immigra-
tion from non-Western countries from the Howard government onwards, and
the increased political demands from, and visibility of, Indigenous people –
including Indigenous women.
9 The academic interest in young women and postfeminism has boomed in recent
years, ranging from Sue Jackson and Tiina Vares’s (2013) work on the sexuali-
sation of young girls, Jessica K. Taft’s (2004) analysis of Girl Power, to Shauna
Pomerantz and Rebecca Raby’s (2017) critique of the overachieving ‘smart
girl’. We now have a formal disciplinary field of girl studies, perhaps taking up
the space once occupied by women’s studies in the academy. Even in the
academy, one should stay young.
10 Gough Whitlam was Australia’s Prime Minister from 1972–1975, and imple-
mented a left-wing agenda that included free tertiary education. He appointed
an advisor on women’s issues, Elizabeth Reid, and a Women’s Affairs Unit in
the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet was established in 1974.
11 The titles of these examples are indicative of this non-lesbian tendency: Patricia
Flokis (2004), ‘I’m not bi, I just pash other women’ and Hannah Gadsby
(2016), ‘Sex tips for ladies who like ladies’.
12 Note that articles frequently have two different titles: one in the Table of Con-
tents and one where it appears in the magazine. Alix Johnson’s article is also titled
‘8 beauty promises’; Georgia Cassimatis’s article is also titled, ‘I must, I must’.
Women’s magazines 117
13 See, for example, ‘He said what at work?’ (2015) regarding sexual harassment;
Johnson (2002); Gawthorne (2009); and ‘Get paid like a man’ (1999).
14 See Felicity Percival (2004) on sex toys and Lizza Gebilagin (2015) on women
making porn.
15 The Australian-born Frank follows a similar transnational path in her career,
having worked for Harper’s Bazaar, Elle, Mademoiselle, and the US and UK
editions of Marie Claire, before setting up the Australian edition. She is the
daughter of Jewish post-Second World War migrant, and Melbourne proto-
celebrity hairdresser, socialite, ex-social columnist, and philanthropist, Lillian
Frank. We suspect that this family background influences Frank’s social con-
science as expressed in Marie Claire.
16 www.marieclairegroup.com/pageEN_Humanistic+commitment.html, viewed 7
July 2016.
17 ‘48 hours in Dubai’ (2016), Marie Claire, December, pp. 264–266; Martin (2016).
18 July 1999, August 2002, June 2012, and May 2013 are anti-ageing special
issues; February 2005 features ‘Your look younger for longer: your stop-the-
clock shopping guide’; April 2006 includes the ‘Celebrity report: when will
your looks peak?’.
19 As listed above, examples include October 2009, January 2015, and January
2016. These are articles that take a political view of multiculturalism, that is,
they look at Australian racism rather than celebrating pluralistic tolerance.
20 The Weekly became a monthly publication from January 1983.
21 Joanne Hollows (2006, p. 106) makes a similar observation regarding the attrac-
tion of Nigella Lawson’s How to Be a Domestic Goddess, namely, that it offers
a domestic fantasy for time-poor working women.
22 Unlike our other titles that show a noticeable increase in celebrity content, The
Weekly is more uneven, with the particular editor seeming to be a major factor
in how much celebrity material is included. Deborah Thomas, for example,
reduces celebrity content and increases feature articles.
23 For instance, ‘Paula Duncan inspired us!’ (1997); Deborah Hutton (1998); ‘Food
in a flash’ (1998); Larry Writer (2007); and Sharon Krum (2009).
24 See Vanessa Gordon (2006), ‘ “New year, new you” special: tone up your body,
mind, relationship and home’.
25 Wendy Hughes (May 2001) on the impact of Germaine Greer’s The Female
Eunuch; Sharon Krum (2005) on Rachel Griffiths; Margaret Pomeranz’s film
reviews; Juliet Rieden (2013) on Magda Szubanski.
26 Celia Barnes (1998) on Hayley Lewis’s return to swimming; Annette Allison
(1997) on Lisa Currie-Kenny’s desire to have another baby.
27 Stories on Greer include Suellen Dainty (2000); Greer’s lengthy essay (2001) on
the impact of The Female Eunuch; and Susan Chenery (2006).
28 Indigenous actor Deborah Mailman features in at least three stories: Williams
(2004); ‘Paradise found’ (2010); Corbett (2012).
29 Ita Buttrose fiercely critiques the lack of paid maternity leave.
References
‘48 hours in Dubai’, 2016, Marie Claire, December, pp. 264–266.
Allison, A. 1997, ‘Model mum’s dream team’, Australian Women’s Weekly,
November, pp. 10–13.
Baker, J. 2011, ‘Peta Toppano: from riches to rags’, Australian Women’s Weekly,
October, pp. 47–52.
118 Women’s magazines
‘Ball-Sports: The Ultimate Guide to Man-Handling’, 2012, Cosmopolitan,
February, pp. 123–130.
Barnes, C. 1998, ‘Hayley’s comeback’, Australian Women’s Weekly, July, pp. 18–19.
Barthes, R. 1985, The fashion system, Jonathan Cape, London.
Bellanta, M. 2012, Larrikins: a history, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia.
Bobrow, H. & Hawkins, J. 2002, ‘V-Day: join us in the fight against violence’,
Marie Claire, December, pp. 63–66.
Bonner, F. 2014a, ‘Magazines’, in S. Cunningham and S. Turnbull (eds), The
media and communications in Australia, 4th edn, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest,
pp. 193–208.
Bonner, F. 2014b, ‘Women’s magazines’, in B. Griffen-Foley (ed.), A companion to
the Australian media, Australian Scholarly Publishing, Kew, pp. 498–500.
Bonner, F. & Mckay, S. 2000, ‘Challenges, determination and triumphs: inspira-
tional discourse in women’s magazine health stories’, Continuum: Journal of
Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 133–144.
Bourdieu, P. 2007, Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste, trans.
R. Nice, Routledge, New York.
Budgeon, S. & Currie, D. 1995, ‘From feminism to postfeminism: women’s libera-
tion in fashion magazines’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 18, no. 2,
pp. 173–186.
Butler, J. 1990, Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity,
Routledge, New York.
Butler, J. 2013, ‘For white girls only? Postfeminism and the politics of inclusion’,
Feminist Formations, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–58.
Buttrose, I. 2000, ‘New mum’s rights’, Australian Women’s Weekly, May, p. 84.
Campo, N. 2010, ‘ “The 24-hour woman”: feminism and the politics of consump-
tion in 1980s Australia’, in R. Crawford, J. Smart and K. Humphrey (eds),
Consumer Australia: historical perspectives, Cambridge Scholars Publishing,
Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 55–72.
Cassimatis, G. 1999, ‘14+, pregnant, post-anorexic: how three women beat their
weight obsession’, January, Cosmopolitan, p. 132.
Chenery, S. 2006, ‘Germaine Greer’s tree change’, Australian Women’s Weekly,
July, pp. 72–76.
Corbett, B. 2012, ‘Soul sister’, Australian Women’s Weekly, September, pp. 94–98.
Corbett, S. 2001, ‘Is she a medical hero or pirate?’ Marie Claire, December,
pp. 38–44.
Cousins, L.E. 2016, ‘Six things I learnt from editing Cleo’, Cleo, March, p.7.
Dabscheck, L. 2005, ‘These women have all had abortions but they won’t show
their faces: why is there still such a stigma attached to our right to choose?’,
Marie Claire, May, pp. 58–62.
Dainty, S. 2000, ‘Essex and the single girl’, Australian Women’s Weekly, March,
14–19.
del-Teso-Craviotto, M. 2006, ‘Words that matter: lexical choice and gender ideo-
logies in women’s magazines’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 38, pp. 2003–2021.
Dobson, A.S. 2012, ‘ “Sexy” and “laddish” girls: unpacking complicity between two
cultural imag(inations)es of young femininity’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 14, no.
2, pp. 253–269.
Dobson, A.S. 2015, Postfeminist digital cultures: femininity, social media, and self-
representation, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Women’s magazines 119
Dyer, R. 1979, Stars, British Film Institute, London.
Farhall, K. 2018, ‘“Girl-on-girl confessions!”’ Changing representations of female–
female sexuality in two Australian women’s magazines’, Sexualities, vol. 21, nos.
1–2, pp. 212–232.
Ferguson, M. 1983, Forever feminine: women’s magazines and the cult of feminin-
ity, Heinemann Educational, London.
Flokis, P. 2004, ‘I’m not bi, I just pash other women’, Cleo, November, pp. 100–112.
‘Food in a flash’, 1998, Australian Women’s Weekly, November, pp. 217–232.
Foyster, R. 2009, ‘Editorial’, Australian Women’s Weekly, August, p. 10.
Freud, S. 1999, The interpretation of dreams, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Friedan, B. 1963, The feminine mystique, Norton, New York.
Gadsby, H. 2016, ‘Sex tips for ladies who like ladies’, Cleo, January, pp. 26–27.
Gawthorne, S. 2009, ‘Can an AVO really protect you?’, Cosmopolitan, April
2009, pp. 98–99.
Gebilagin, L. 2015, ‘100% organic porn natural’, Cleo, February, pp. 38–39.
Genz, S. 2008, ‘ “I am not a housewife, but …”: postfeminism and the revival of
domesticity’, in S. Gillis & J. Hollows (eds), Femininity, domesticity and popular
culture, Routledge, London, pp. 49–62.
Genz, S. 2009, Postfemininities in popular culture, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Genz, S. 2010, ‘Singled out: postfeminism’s “new woman” and the dilemma of
having it all’, Journal of Popular Culture, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 97–119.
George, C. 1998, ‘The power of love’ (also titled ‘Susie O’Neill: my fairy tale love
life’), Australian Women’s Weekly, November, pp. 4–7.
‘Get paid like a man’, 1999, Cleo, July, pp. 74–77.
Gill, R. 2007a, Gender and the media, Polity, Cambridge.
Gill, R. 2007b, ‘Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility’, European
Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–166.
Gill, R. 2009, ‘Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: a discourse analytic examin-
ation of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine’, Discourse and
Communication, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 345–369.
Goodwin, J. 2000, ‘Why do women still live in fear in the year 2000?’, Marie
Claire, January, pp. 46–52.
Gordon, V. 2006, ‘Seize the moment! It’s never too late to change your life’,
Australian Women’s Weekly, July, pp. 184–187.
Gough-Yates, A. 2003, Understanding women’s magazines: publishing, markets
and readerships, Routledge, London.
Greer, G. 1970, The female eunuch, MacGibbon & Kee, London.
Greer, G. 2001, ‘The impact of The Female Eunuch’, Australian Women’s Weekly,
May, pp. 66–72.
Haworth, A. 2002, ‘These girls are banned from having sex’, Marie Claire,
December, pp. 104–108.
Hermes, J. 1995, Reading women’s magazines: an analysis of everyday media use,
Polity, Cambridge.
‘He said what at work?’, 2015, Cosmopolitan, June, pp. 66–72.
Hollows, J. 2006, ‘Can I go home yet? Feminism, post-feminism and domesticity’,
in J. Hollows & R. Moseley (eds), Feminism in popular culture, Berg, Oxford,
pp. 97–118.
Holmes, S. & Negra, D. (eds) 2011, In the limelight and under the microscope:
forms and functions of female celebrity, Continuum, New York.
120 Women’s magazines
Hunt, P.D. 2012, ‘Editing desire, working girl wisdom, and cupcakeable goodness:
Helen Gurley Brown and the triumph of Cosmopolitan’, Journalism History,
vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 130–141.
Hutton, D. 1998, ‘The little black dress for under $100’, Australian Women’s
Weekly, November, pp. 138–139.
Iley, C. 2011, ‘For Dannii the show goes on’, Australian Women’s Weekly, July,
pp. 48–56.
Jackson, S. & Vares, T. 2013, ‘ “Perfect skin”, “pretty skinny”: girls’ embodied
identities and post-feminist popular culture’, Journal of Gender Studies, vol. 24,
no. 3, pp. 1–14.
Jermyn, D. 2016, ‘Pretty past it? Interrogating the post-feminist makeover of
ageing, style, and fashion’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 573–589.
Jermyn, D. & Holmes, S. (eds) 2015, Women, celebrity and cultures of ageing:
freeze frame, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Johnson, A. 1999, ‘Look like a babe (when you feel like a blob)’, January, Cosmo-
politan, pp. 128–131.
Johnson, A. 2002, ‘Paid maternity leave: why we need it’, Cleo, October 2002,
pp. 204–207.
Kendall, G., Woodward, I., & Skrbis, Z. 2009, The sociology of cosmopolitanism:
globalization, identity, culture and government, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Knoll, J. 2010, ‘King Dong: my life with a massive penis’, Cosmopolitan, January,
pp. 128–129.
Kolehmainen, M. 2010, ‘Normalizing and gendering affects: how the relation to
porn is constructed in young women’s magazines’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 10,
no. 2, pp. 179–194.
Krum, S. 2005, ‘Baby love’, Australian Women’s Weekly, November, pp. 24–30.
Krum, S. 2009, ‘Dr Pamela, we presume?’, [Pamela Stephenson’s relationship
column] Australian Women’s Weekly, January, pp. 84–86.
Lake, M. 1999, Getting equal: the history of Australian feminism, Allen & Unwin,
St Leonards.
Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J. B. 1973, The language of psycho-analysis, trans.
D. Nicholson-Smith, Norton, New York.
Le Masurier, M. 2007, ‘My other, my self: Cleo magazine and feminism in 1970s
Australia’, Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 22, no. 53, pp. 191–211.
Le Masurier, M. 2009, ‘Desiring the (popular feminist) reader: letters to Cleo
during the second wave’, Media Information Australia, no. 131 May,
pp. 106–119.
Le Masurier, M. 2011, ‘Reading the flesh: popular feminism, the second wave and
Cleo’s male centrefold’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 215–229.
Leser, D. 2002, ‘Behind the wire’, Australian Women’s Weekly, July, p. 42.
MacDonald, M. 1995, Representing women: myths of femininity in the popular
media, Edward Arnold, London.
Marinos, S. 1999, ‘Danger on the job’, Marie Claire, July, pp. 32–38.
Martin, B. 2016, ‘Blue sky days’, Marie Claire, July, pp. 194–197.
McRobbie, A. 1991, Feminism and youth culture: from ‘Jackie’ to ‘Just seventeen’,
Macmillan, Houndmills.
McRobbie, A. 1999, ‘More! new sexualities in girls’ and women’s magazines’, in
A. McRobbie (ed.), In the culture society: art, fashion and popular music,
Routledge, London, pp. 46–61.
Women’s magazines 121
McRobbie, A. 2009, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change,
Sage, London.
Moeran, B. 2006, ‘More than just a fashion magazine’, Current Sociology, vol. 54,
no. 5, pp. 725–744.
Moeran, B. 2017, ‘Fashion magazines and fashion as a system of magic’, AT:
Anthropology today, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 3–9.
Moreton-Robinson, A. 2000, Talkin’ up to the white woman: Aboriginal women
and feminism, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia.
Negra, D. 2009, What a girl wants? Fantasizing the reclamation of self in postfem-
inism, Routledge, London.
‘ “New year, new you” special: tone up your body, mind, relationship and home’,
2009, Australian Women’s Weekly, January, p. 10.
Nixon, S. 1996, Hard looks, masculinities, spectatorship and contemporary con-
sumption, St Martin’s Press, New York.
O’Brien, D. 1982, The Weekly: a lively and nostalgic celebration of Australia
through 50 years of its most popular magazine, Penguin, Ringwood.
‘Paradise found’, 2010, Australian Women’s Weekly, November, pp. 123–128.
‘Paula Duncan inspired us!’, 1997, Australian Women’s Weekly, August,
pp. 120–121.
Percival, F. 2004, ‘Girls who like toys: new sex gadgets to try’, Cleo, February,
pp. 136–139.
Pomerantz, S. & Raby, R. 2017, Smart girls: success, school, and the myth of post-
feminism, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Projansky, S. 2014, Spectacular girls: media fascination and celebrity culture, New
York University Press, New York.
Pusey, M. 2003, The experience of middle Australia: the dark side of economic
reform, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Renkert, E. 2001, ‘Has a colleague ever come to work with a black eye? Worn a
jumper in summer, had unexplained absences?’, Marie Claire, December,
pp. 97–100.
Rieden, J. 2013, ‘Magda Szubanski: “At last I’ve got nothing to hide” ’, Australian
Women’s Weekly, March, pp. 104–110.
Robinson, F. & Dabscheck, L. 2005, ‘Start talking to stop the violence’, Marie
Claire, March, pp. 62–70.
Roy Morgan 2018, Australian magazine readership, 12 months to September
2018, viewed 12 December 2018, http://roymorgan.com.au/industries/media/
readership/magazine-readership.
Scanlon, J. 2009, Bad girls go everywhere: the life of Helen Gurley Brown, Oxford
University Press, New York.
Schneider, T. & Davis, T. 2010, ‘Fostering a hunger for health: food and the self in
The Australian Women’s Weekly’, Health Sociology Review, vol. 19, no. 3,
pp. 285–303.
Seward, S. 1998, ‘Taking tea with Charles’, Australian Women’s Weekly, Novem-
ber, pp. 24–26.
Sha, J. & Kirkman, M. 2009, ‘Shaping pregnancy’, Australian Feminist Studies,
vol. 24, no. 61, pp. 359–371.
‘Shadows of the Past’, 2003, Australian Women’s Weekly, July, pp. 18–23.
Sheather, M. 2005, ‘Jana’s story’, Australian Women’s Weekly, November,
pp. 38–44.
122 Women’s magazines
Sheridan, S., Baird, B., Borrett, K., & Ryan, L. 2002, Who was that woman? The
Australian Women’s Weekly in the postwar years, UNSW Press, Sydney.
Skrbis, Z. & Woodward, I. 2013, Cosmopolitanism: uses of an idea, Sage,
London.
Szerszynski, B. & Urry, J. 2002, ‘Cultures of cosmopolitanism’, Sociological
Review, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 461–481.
Taft, J.K. 2004, ‘Girl power politics: pop-culture barriers and organizational resist-
ance’, in A. Harris (ed.), All about the girl: culture, power, and identity,
Routledge, New York, pp. 69–78.
Taylor, A. 2016, Celebrity and the feminist blockbuster, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Thomas, D. & Clements, K. 2014, The Australian Women’s Weekly fashion: the
first 50 years, National Library of Australia, Canberra.
Turner, G. 2004, Understanding celebrity, Sage, London.
Vrana, H. 2007–2008, ‘An “other” woman? Juchitec muxes in Marie Claire and
documentary’, Michigan Feminist Studies, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–23.
Wearing, S. 2007, ‘Subjects of rejuvenation: aging in postfeminist culture’, in
Y. Tasker & D. Negra (eds), Interrogating postfeminism: gender and the politics
of popular culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 277–310.
Weaver, C. 2016, ‘Island of the damned’, Australian Women’s Weekly, March,
pp. 36–42.
Whelehan, I. 2000, Overloaded: popular culture and the future of feminism, The
Women’s Press, London.
Whelehan, I. & Gwynne, J. (eds) 2015, Ageing, popular culture and contemporary
feminism: harleys and hormones, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Williams, S. 2004, ‘Deborah and Sibylla’s secret life’, Australian Women’s Weekly,
January, pp. 60–63.
Winship, J. 1987, Inside women’s magazines, Pandora: London.
Winship, J. 1991, ‘The impossibility of best: enterprise meets domesticity in the
practical women’s magazines of the 1980s’, Cultural Studies, vol. 5, no. 2,
pp. 131–156.
Writer, L. 2007, ‘Melissa Doyle’s mums’ survival guide [for working mums]’,
Australian Women’s Weekly, October, pp. 22–26.
Yeatman, A. 1990, Bureaucrats, technocrats, femocrats: essays on the con-
temporary Australian state, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Ytre-Arne, B. 2011, ‘Women’s magazines and their readers: the relationship
between textual features and practices of reading’, European Journal of Cultural
Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 213–228.
4 YouTube beauty vlogs
Intimate publics and postfeminist
confidence and care
Audiences also work to support vloggers after they post material charac-
terised by negative affect, as well as themselves sharing their own stories
(as the myriad comments in response to such revelatory vlogs indicate).
Mansutti – in the confessional mode that marks many vlogs – narrates
her own struggles with depression, anxiety, and self-esteem issues. On
22 May 2017, for example, she uploaded a ‘Depression and Suicide’
vlog, in which – while lying on her bed, in full make-up – she reveals she
has suffered from depression and anxiety from a young age.13 She tells
followers, rather optimistically and problematically, ‘all you need to do is
punch that depression in the face … not give it the power to take over
who we are’ (Mansutti 2017a). Like Zoella, she implores audiences to
respond to ‘panic and anxiety by simply willing it away, assuming such
transformative power is available to all social actors’, rather than just to
white, heterosexual, middle-class subjects like herself (Bishop 2018,
p. 98). However, despite this individualising rhetoric, she also argues that
depression needs to feature more in public discourse, be socially normal-
ised, and medically treated like any other illness. As throughout, and
contra both postfeminist and neoliberal logics, she refuses to position the
individual as responsible for any anxieties or insecurities she may be
experiencing, noting ‘industries thrive on us feeling bad about ourselves’
(a somewhat ironic statement given her beauty tutorials also produce
such affect).
Confessing to having been taken to ‘dark’ and ‘damaging places’ as a
result of her depression, implicitly referring to suicide, Mansutti seeks to
combat the sense of isolation that often marks periods of depression
(2017a). She reassures audiences that she speaks with authority about the
YouTube beauty vlogs 139
dangers of suicidal thoughts because she has lived it, and perhaps more
importantly, survived. As we have shown with Curtis, such ‘revelation-
based intimacy’ is central to fostering online sociality (Kanai 2017,
p. 298), while also itself being crucial to the maintenance of an affectively
resonant celebrity. These vloggers are, in effect, a form of ‘ordinary
experts’ (Tolson 2010, pp. 283–285), and copious audience responses
reveal that their advice is seen as legitimate and appreciated, not least
because of this (albeit performed) sense of ordinariness. Moreover, the pre-
valence of ‘postfeminist disorders’ such as depression and anxiety amongst
girls and young women can be read, in McRobbie’s terms, as forms of
‘illegible rage’ (2009; Elias et al. 2017, p. 26). However, Mansutti does not
always ‘parcel’ her distress and pain ‘into a consumable, funny, light-
hearted package’, as Kanai (2017, pp. 304–305) has argued of the Tumblr
bloggers she studied, but foregrounds it. Like Kanai, Gill and Orgad
suggest that self-confidence permits no space for feeling bad; in such a
context, ‘other affects are systematically disallowed and viciously policed –
particularly insecurity’ (2017, p. 33). Conversely, Mansutti encourages her
audience to render these more negative affects visible, in the way that she
herself does through this channel.
Another vlog, ‘We need to talk about depression’ (2016c), features
Mansutti, again in the intimate space of her bed, noting that because she
has such a large platform, she needs to take the opportunity to ‘openly
discuss’ depression further. In the psychoanalytic logic of the ‘talking cure’
familiar to reality television (Shattuc 1997), she urges those suffering to
avail themselves of the participatory, confessional capacities of the form,
to ‘just talk about it, even if it’s just writing a comment below’. However,
it is common to dismiss such vloggers as engaging in a strategic form of
self-branding, underpinned by ‘entrepreneurial intent’ (Bishop 2018, p. 95)
that benefits only themselves (and the beauty companies and products with
which they are associated). Such criticisms are commonly made of celeb-
rities who engage in philanthropic (or what Rojek [2013] dubs ‘celan-
thropic’) work – that it is merely a cynical branding exercise. In contrast,
we argue this is a very limited way of responding to the cultural and affec-
tive work vloggers are doing. Vloggers are similar to reality TV lifestyle
experts, who have increasingly adopted roles formerly undertaken by those
more closely associated with the State (Lewis 2008). In such a context,
‘coaches, motivational speakers, corporate sponsors, and [micro] celeb-
rities take over the dispersed governmental work once performed by social
workers, educators and other professionals’ (Ouellette & Hay 2008,
p. 474), and via which individuals are seen to be ‘governed at a distance’
(Rose 1996). But the support, recognition, and the intimate publics they
help produce should not just be discounted as a form of governmentality.
As Amy Dobson notes in her analysis of pain memes, and as Michael
Lovelock (2017) and Tobias Raun (2018) have similarly argued in their
analyses of coming out and trans vlogs respectively, ‘young people may go
140 YouTube beauty vlogs
online for support from peer audiences because speaking to healthcare
practitioners is experienced as fruitless at best and abusive at worst’
(Dobson 2015b, p. 177; see also boyd 2014).
In ‘Living with Social Anxiety’ (2016b), which received over 3,000 sub-
scriber comments, Mansutti again encourages those who feel they cannot
discuss such issues elsewhere to form a ‘community’ in the comments
section and ‘help each other out’.14 Here, she explicitly calls upon her audi-
ence to form a digital intimate public, providing each other with empathy
and online support. Such vlogs, then, help create ‘networked communities
that foster care of the self’ (Ouellette & Arcy 2015, p. 103). As in earlier
vlogs, she emphasises that her advice is in no way professional, just her
‘personal story’ about how she has managed social anxiety, and – rather
than simply changing their attitudes (though she does this at points too) –
she encourages viewers to seek professional help as she has done. While
Mansutti may appear outwardly to be successful she is at pains to establish
that her inner life (like those of her subscribers) is much more complicated
than her make-up tutorials imply, and she routinely draws clear distinc-
tions between these performances and the ‘real’ Dani accessible via vlogs.
In her automedial advice vlogs, Mansutti constructs herself as a highly
insecure, unconfident woman, seeking to demonstrate that she suffers in
the way many women do – despite her beauty vlogger celebrity. In ‘I’m
Not Good Enough’ (2016a), which is explicitly framed as ‘sharing advice’,
she confesses to having life-long ‘self-esteem issues’. She remarks: ‘Just
because I post photos of myself doesn’t mean that I’m super confident …
the biggest journey I am going on in my 20s is learning to love myself’.
Throughout such vlogs, Mansutti underscores that it is social media
and especially her profession that results in her subjection to an intensi-
fied, regulatory (largely female) gaze – itself a mark of postfeminism
(Banet-Weiser 2012; Winch 2013). Social media lives, she emphasises, are
not ‘reality’, but heavily curated, and merely work to ensure audiences feel
bad about themselves. This is a familiar, if ironic, refrain in the beauty
vlogosphere (as the previous section on Curtis has shown).15 Rather than
simply unequivocally celebrating her job as a beauty vlogger, as is common
(Banet-Weiser 2017), she notes ‘I am scrutinised so hard on everything
that I do online’ and that this kind of labour, without the face-to-face
sociality of a regular workplace, is isolating and anxiety-provoking. She
tells her audience that she ‘plays a little bit of character online’, perform-
ing as ‘so much more bubbly and lively’ to ‘come across as really happy
and carefree and everything’ (Mansutti 2016a). Indicative of the ‘limitless
positivity’ (Bishop 2018, p. 102) said to be required of women vloggers,
she underscores how being a YouTuber is, like other forms of micro-
celebrity, a ‘performative practice’ (Marwick & boyd 2011) – including in
terms of embodying positive affect: ‘If I’m not really happy that day, I just
put on a smile for work’. Conversely, in advice vlogs (as opposed to
beauty tutorials), she disavows this performative aspect and positions
YouTube beauty vlogs 141
herself as genuine and authentic, using this vlog’s lack of a ‘script’ as
further evidence of its purportedly unmediated nature. As Berryman and
Kavka argue,
As she notes in the paratext of ‘I’m Not Good Enough’ (Mansutti 2016a),
in the form of a short, written blurb located beneath it: ‘Today’s video is
an important video focusing upon self-worth, insecurities, low self-esteem
and negativity. I hope this helps at least one of you. Please remember that
you’re amazing. x’. As evidence of its resonance, viewer commentary (over
1,770 posts) in response to this vlog is overwhelmingly supportive, with
many noting how ‘relatable’ she is and how much this particular video has
helped them in terms of their own self-esteem issues. She also suggests that
her project represents an ethical use of the audience she has secured; that
is, as a micro-celebrity with a platform for reaching so many, she tells us it
is her duty to help her (women) viewers reconceptualise themselves and
their bodies:
This video is for anyone who has ever looked at themselves in the
mirror and hated what they saw, for anyone who has ever spent hours
comparing themselves to girls on Instagram or in magazines … I want
to teach you how to love your body. It’s the most amazing mechanism
in the world. It just wants to feel the love from you that it deserves.
(2017b)
Such ‘love your body’ (LYB) discourses have been cast as fundamentally
ambivalent, especially as they appear to reinscribe the female body as
pathologised: ‘LYB discourses rely upon and reinforce the cultural intelligi-
bility of the female body as inherently “difficult to love” ’ (Gill & Elias
2014, p. 184). Naturalising and normalising this bodily hatred, position-
ing it as a universalised feminine experience, serves simply to buttress the
kinds of gendered assumptions advertisers, such as Dove, purport to be
contesting (Gill & Elias 2014; see also Banet-Weiser 2017). For Gill and
Elias (2014, p. 185), such LYB discourses simply represent a new form of
regulating women, not just physically but also psychically. As we con-
clude, however, responses to these vlogs complicate such framing.
The emphasis in Mansutti’s mental health vlogs, as the above examples
make clear, is on ‘self-love not self-hate, self-assurance not insecurity,
building the self, not self-harm, positive image not self-criticism etc’ (Gill
& Orgad 2015, p. 341). While Gill and Orgad dismiss the feminist
potentialities of such discourses, we are more circumspect, given that
such advice appears to be reverberating with audiences; they offer, we
would suggest, more than just an ‘instrumentalised’ and/or reactionary
form of feminism that works to merely buttress postfeminism in a more
complicated way than disavowal (Kanai 2019; see also Gill 2017; Gill &
Orgad 2017; Banet-Weiser 2018). For example, in a recent vlog about
doctoring photos of herself using the ‘Facetune’ application (Mansutti
2018), which begins with a deep sigh to signal some difficulty in raising
the forthcoming material,17 Mansutti critically reflects upon the effects of
her self-representational practices on her audience, especially as young
girls often write to her about their imperfect bodies after consuming her
heavily edited photographs: ‘We [beauty vloggers] are contributing to
this problem, and I am being such a hypocrite. How on earth can I put
up a photo about body acceptance and self-love if that photo is edited?
… I’m so done with sending out a false image of who I am’ (Mansutti
2018). She thus frames ‘authenticity’ as a moral duty, and remarks that
she hopes to ‘start a movement’ against airbrushing and photo-shopping,
144 YouTube beauty vlogs
given the damage it is causing to her young women subscribers. Again,
the response from audiences is effusive, celebrating her generosity, open-
ness, and self-reflexivity; one tells her it is one of the ‘rawest and realist
videos you’ve ever made and I’m proud of you’ (SS) – numerous fol-
lowers express such pride at her public refusal to no longer ‘mask’ her
real self and to take a stand about these formerly invisible practices of
apparent misrepresentation.
Guaranteeing subscribers that she will no longer use such apps, because
of how they make young women feel about themselves, Mansutti encour-
ages others with power in this attention economy to do the same: ‘I want
to apologise to you for what I’ve done … it would be great if other influ-
encers would join me on this’. Here, the ‘problem’ is not insecure audi-
ences who just need to accept themselves and develop self-confidence, but
the beauty vloggers who are thoroughly implicated in, and whose practices
work to foster, the judgement and regulation of women’s bodies. This may
not appear to be what some would consider feminist work in a traditional
sense, but there is no doubt that this is a noteworthy political gesture,
calling into question the impetus towards bodily perfection for women,
and how a collective of women (i.e. beauty vloggers) can take action to
transform attitudes and gendered behaviours.
Intimate publics, such as those brought into being in and through these
vlogs, can be conceptualised as ‘juxtapolitical’, signalling a form of social-
ity which:
One of the main jobs of the minoritized arts that circulate through
mass culture [in which we can now place vlogs] is to tell identifying
consumers that ‘you are not alone (in your struggles, desires, pleas-
ures)’: this is something we know but never tire of hearing confirmed,
because aloneness is one of the affective experiences of being collec-
tively, structurally unprivileged.
(2008, pp. ix–x)
YouTube beauty vlogs 145
Young women’s experiences are not individualised in these vlogs, but – in
addition to being ‘powerful forces for the discussion of the life experiences
of young people’ – something that unites these anxious postfeminist sub-
jects, even if not necessarily resulting in ‘substantive cultural change’
(Douglas & Poletti 2016, p. 201).
Indicative of its power, Mansutti’s critique of the judgement and self-
surveillance of her body (2017b) appears to resonate with women sub-
scribers, who overwhelmingly dub her ‘inspirational’ in the comments
section: ‘Your words are so empowering. You go Dani!!!’ (AM), for
instance. Another follower draws attention to her implicitly feminist work:
‘Ah this is just what I needed to hear; made me cry; thankyou for sharing
how you’ve felt and doing all you can to make a difference. Women sup-
porting women’ (AC). Many others also note that they watched with tears
in their eyes, and reciprocate by sharing their own deeply held bodily anxi-
eties. Similarly, in response to another vlog (2017c), a young girl posts:
‘I’m 12 and every time I go on social media I feel pressured to be perfect
and to have looks and body and it makes me feel so down but I just
watched this video and it was so relatable and special! all your videos help
me live through everyday! thank you for everything xxx’ (TM). The
majority of this intimate public appear grateful to know that they are not
alone, indicating such vlogs are fulfilling an important affective function
that should not, we argue, be discounted – despite its emergence from a
beauty channel. As Ouellette and Arcy (2015, p. 111) note, drawing upon
Sara Ahmed, ‘we need to be careful about collapsing all forms of self-care
under the banner of neoliberalism [or indeed postfeminism]’, and recognise
the affective and political potential of such vlogs.
Conclusion
As we have shown, these vloggers help to bring into being intimate
publics, and act as sites for the public performance of both positive and
negative affect, offering feminist-informed critiques of gendered judge-
ments that speak to large audiences of girls and young women. Central to
this transnational semioscape of confidence and care is a form of postfemi-
nist kinship (like in the dramedy chapter), much needed in a neoliberal
environment in which the individual is supposed to ‘do it herself’. While
they may seek to sell make-up, they also use this platform in another way:
to make explicit and help to manage the anxieties, tensions, and often pain
that constitute contemporary girls’ and women’s subjectivities. We are not
suggesting this is unproblematic, especially given the positioning of anxiety
as something all young women must now face and manage in the same
way (Gill & Orgad 2015), but we cannot ignore that ‘the emotion work of
advice-giving and the communication of support constitute important
arenas of political activity’ (Renstchler 2014, p. 77). These vloggers
provide a space for, and themselves model, the sharing of experiences and
146 YouTube beauty vlogs
strategies (at times consistent with postfeminism and neoliberalism, at
others not), performed by the individual but recommended to the
collective.
Although, of course, engaged in acts of self-representation that are pro-
foundly shaped by the platform, they are best conceptualised as ‘suffering
actors’, working to publicly make sense – both for themselves and for
those who become enfolded into these intimate publics – of their contra-
dictory positioning within neoliberal and postfeminist logics, and are argu-
ably interested ‘less in changing the world than in not being defeated by it’
(Berlant in Harris & Dobson 2015, p. 9; see also Dobson & Kanai 2018;
McDermott 2018). Such vlogs, though not conventional political forms,
do evidence young women’s ‘struggles for coherence, social acceptance and
survival’, which need to be better understood as agentic, and we would
add feminist, acts (Harris & Dobson 2015, p. 9, emphasis added; see also
Dobson 2015b). However, this is not a simple attempt to recuperate these
vlogs as resistant rather than normative, the problems of which have been
outlined by other critics (Garcia-Rapp 2018; McDermott 2018), but to
emphasise that we need to further attend to the affective and psychic life of
popular culture, as well as to the kind of feminisms that may be mobilised
therein (Gill & Kanai 2018; Kanai 2019), something we also take up in
the next chapter on self-help literature.
In feminist terms, the supportive networks we have identified as consti-
tuting the beauty vlogging semioscape are significant, especially in offering
affective bonds to, at times quite isolated, women (in Australian rural set-
tings as well as regional towns, for instance). These networks also offer a
kind of solidarity, particularly around the ongoing judgement and regula-
tion of women’s bodies, with many increasingly using their vlogs to
provide tools for girls and young women to negotiate this, often toxic,
environment by means other than withdrawal. As we have posited, despite
their reinscription of ‘confidence culture’ rhetoric, it is not productive to
completely dismiss these vloggers’ affective ties and advice, and to criticise
them for not offering manifestos to collectively dismantle the patriarchy is
misplaced. But we can further think through the needs these young women
are fulfilling and the kinds of femininities they, and their audiences/fans,
are being expected to embody in contemporary Australia – and, given the
transnational nature of postfeminism, beyond.
If this feminism of self-love, confidence, and acceptance – even when it
is perhaps contradicted by the beauty pedagogies in which it is implicated
– is the kind that is resonating with young women, we need to engage with
why this might be the case, including via more empirical work. Finally,
despite much scholarship that presumes postfeminism successfully captures
unwitting female audiences (a deeply gendered position critiqued by cul-
tural studies long ago), they are no more ‘duped’ by these vloggers than
they are by other forms of popular culture – something which applies as
much to its creators. As Mary Celeste Kearney (2015, p. 272; see also
YouTube beauty vlogs 147
White 2015) argues, ‘Surely there is more to these … girl-made media than
their creators’ passive absorption of postfeminist rhetoric’. The next
chapter, building upon the ideas canvassed here, focuses on the ways in
which feminism has come to inform self-help discourse, itself a space for
thinking through how macro political shifts may play out at the micro
level of individual women’s lives, and how a spectral form of feminism is
being invoked to help make sense of, and negotiate the ongoing tensions
in, contemporary Australian women’s lives.
Notes
1 Although it is beyond the scope of this chapter to further take up how girls are
framed in scholarship on postfeminism, it is worth noting that in myriad
studies, girls and young women are considered to be particularly problematic
within postfeminist (and indeed neoliberal) discursive frameworks. For
example,
Girlness – particularly adolescent girlness – epitomizes postfeminism. If the
postfeminist woman is always in process, always using the freedom and
equality handed to her by feminism in pursuit of having it all … but never
quite managing to reach full adulthood, to fully have it all, one could say
that the postfeminist woman is quintessentially adolescent … no matter
what her age.
(Projansky 2007, p. 45)
For a critique of such critical positioning, see Kearney (2015) and Driscoll (2018).
2 While our central preoccupation here is not labour, it is crucial, as Brooke Erin
Duffy (2017, p. 48) reminds us, to not just dismiss vloggers as dupes of capit-
alism – or, we would add, patriarchy – unwittingly providing ‘free’ labour,
‘just for the fun of it’, or in the service of pernicious beauty industries. Rather,
as she found, young women ‘approach social media creation with strategy,
purpose, and aspirations of career success’ and ‘the production of social media
content’ provides an opportunity through which young can women ‘manage
one’s employment prospects in the face of radical uncertainty’ (Duffy 2017,
pp. 48, 54, original emphasis). This is not to normalise or be uncritical of such
precarity, but to highlight young women’s creative responses to it. Although
contracts with corporations or sponsorship deals, or the creation of their own
beauty and/or fashion lines, are not available to all (Banet-Weiser 2017,
p. 272), the vloggers we look at have achieved success and transformed their
labour into a viable career, reliant, of course, on a consistent self-brand.
3 As Gill notes (2007, p. 182) of women’s magazines, ‘Beauty editors routinely
receive huge boxes of free gifts from the cosmetic companies eager for their
new product to get a write up; fashion editors “borrow” clothes from design-
ers, fashion houses and clothes stores to photograph or describe …’. This role,
as previously remarked in our chapters on chick lit and women’s magazines,
has now in many ways been taken up by beauty vloggers, especially through
what are referred to as ‘haul’ vlogs where vloggers review products that have
been sent to them.
4 They commonly offer travel vlogs, where trips are usually sponsored by a cos-
metics company, such as Benefit, and there is commonly a group of beauty
vloggers. These filmed holidays to luxury destinations such as the Maldives, in
addition to providing further insight into vloggers’ lives, work to create the
148 YouTube beauty vlogs
sense of the desirability and viability of beauty vlogging as an occupation for
young women. Their lives are considerably glamourised and their online labour
is shown to significantly pay off; of course as many scholars have pointed out
(Duffy 2017; Banet-Weiser 2017), this is not the case for all vloggers.
5 As Turner (2004) argues, such a shift is itself constitutive of celebrity.
6 The many ‘follow me’ style vlogs – where she speaks directly into a hand-held
camera, or perhaps phone, with the audiences effectively accompanying her on
her various errands – purport to offer an unmediated access (itself, of course,
impossible) to the ‘real’ Curtis (see ‘Snoop in My Bag, Closets and Fridge’,
2014b), and thus are integral to this sense of intimacy (Smith & Watson 2015).
That is, they are central to establishing the authenticity upon which this form
relies for its success. In a piece titled ‘WeeklyVlog: Whaaat Did I Just Eat?!’,
Curtis (2016c) tells viewers: ‘I’m really enjoying vlogging cos I feel like it
allows you guys to get to know me better, which is super important to me! Let
me know what you thought!:) xxx’.
7 Such vlogs often dually function as promotional videos, as she sometimes lists
the brands of clothes she is wearing or the various products she is consuming.
8 See Berryman and Kavka (2017) for an analysis of the ‘big sister’ positioning of
beauty vloggers.
9 Viewers, however, are aware of the contradiction of such advice coming from a
beauty influencer: ‘I like your videos but this is a little hypocritical – you’re
saying you shouldnt [sic] wear too much make up but your whole job revolves
around beauty, make up and looking a certain way’ (HS, in response to
‘Advice on Boys, Bullying and Self Confidence!’).
10 In this respect, though of course very different texts, their responses are remin-
iscent of those sent to authors of ‘feminist blockbusters’, such as Betty Friedan
and Germaine Greer, who are routinely credited with articulating what women
readers themselves simply could not (Taylor 2016).
11 Enormously popular Asian-Australian beauty/lifestyle vlogger Wengie (nearly
13.4 million followers), who mounts a significant challenge to the whiteness of
the beauty vlogosphere, reassures her followers that it is possible to ‘come from
nothing and create a really good life for yourself … You shouldn’t be limited
by any circumstances you were born in’ (2015). She emphasises the agency,
self-motivation, and creativity of the refugee subject, one who is unhindered by
race or class and who uses their adversity to become a successful, upwardly
mobile entrepreneur.
12 This section was available during 2017 and 2018 while we were undertaking
this research, however it appears to have been removed. Individual vlogs that
made up this section are still available on YouTube.
13 Her first vlog along these lines, ‘Bullying and Depression: My Story’, was
uploaded in December 2014, focusing on the bullying she had experienced at
school and on Facebook (including groups such as ‘Dani’s an ugly whore’ and
‘Dani’s a fat slut’ where photos would be uploaded without her consent and
she would be ridiculed). She suggests that Tumblr was her ‘saviour’, where she
blogged about these issues and took control of her representation (2014).
14 This vlog is very similar to one offered by the UK’s most subscribed beauty
vlogger, Zoella, entitled ‘Dealing with Panic Attacks and Anxiety’ (7 Novem-
ber 2012).
15 She notes that ‘social media is the edited existence of our being, so it isn’t
“us” ’ (Mansutti 2017c).
16 As Berryman and Kavka note (2018, p. 93),
At odds with the YouTube Partner Policy updated in late August 2016,
these vlogs run the risk of being judged ‘not advertiser friendly’ should they
YouTube beauty vlogs 149
involve profanities or discuss ‘sensitive subjects’ (YouTube, n.d.), in turn
preventing vloggers registered with the Partner Program from generating
revenue through the adverts placed before, during and around these videos.
17 As Berryman and Kavka further note, ‘YouTubers proclaim that their uneasi-
ness at discussing such personal information will be “worth it” if the message
of their videos resonates with their viewers’ (2018, p. 89).
References
Abidin, C. 2018, Internet celebrity: understanding fame online, Emerald Publish-
ing, Bingley.
Affuso, E. 2017, ‘The labour of transformation: spaces of feminine imperfection in
YouTube videos’, Flow, 27 November, viewed 20 April 2019, www.flowjournal.
org/2017/11/the-labor-of-transformation/.
Andrejevic, M. 2004, Reality TV: the work of being watched, Rowman & Little-
field, New York.
Appadurai, A. 1996, Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization,
University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Banet-Weiser, S. 2012, Authentic™: The politics of ambivalence in a brand culture,
Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Banet-Weiser, S. 2017, ‘ “I’m beautiful the way I Am”: empowerment, beauty, and
aesthetic labour’, in A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aesthetic labour: rethinking
beauty politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 265–282.
Banet-Weiser, S. 2018, Empowered: popular feminism and popular misogyny,
Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Berger, J. 1972, Ways of seeing, Penguin, London.
Berlant, L. 2008, The female complaint: the unfinished business of sentimentality
in American culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Berryman, R. & Kavka, M. 2017, ‘ “I guess a lot of people see me as a big sister or
a friend”: the role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers’, Journal
of Gender Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 307–320.
Berryman, R. & Kavka, M. 2018, ‘Crying on YouTube: vlogs, self-exposure and
the productivity of negative affect’, Convergence, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 85–98.
Bishop, S. 2018, ‘#YouTuber Anxiety: anxiety as emotional labour and masquer-
ade in beauty vlogs’, in S. Driver & N. Coulter (eds), Youth mediations and
affective relations, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
boyd, d. 2014, It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens, Yale University
Press, New Haven, CT.
Braidotti, R. 2006, Transpositions, Polity, Cambridge.
Burgess, J. & Green, J. 2009, YouTube: online video and participatory culture,
Polity, Cambridge.
Curtis, L. 2013a, ‘Advice on boys, bullying and self confidence!’, vlog, 1 February,
YouTube, viewed 15 September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIe_nVlzPAo.
Curtis, L. 2013b, ‘Fifty facts about me tag’, vlog, 21 May, YouTube, viewed
20 September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCkvcoHkO3E.
Curtis, L. 2014a, ‘Q&A, my break up, my income, my Body’, vlog, 6 October
2014, YouTube, viewed 15 September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_
iORlx5-xQ.
150 YouTube beauty vlogs
Curtis, L. 2014b, ‘Snoop in my bag, closets and fridge’, vlog, 28 July, YouTube,
viewed 3 May 2019, www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFO2r7E7kNc.
Curtis, L. 2014c, ‘Surviving high school – yuck!’, vlog, 24 June, YouTube, viewed
15 September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya-O3b1IVZY.
Curtis, L. 2014d, ‘Q&A: my breakup, my income, my body’, vlog, YouTube,
6 October, viewed 16 September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_
iORlx5-xQ.
Curtis, L. 2015a, ‘Boy talk: overcoming insecurities & breakups, finding “the
one” ’, 26 October, vlog, YouTube, viewed 17 September 2017, www.youtube.
com/watch?v=2fXaAKR14bY.
Curtis, L. 2015b, ‘Chat with me/GRWM: life updates and embarrassing stories!’,
vlog, 5 September, YouTube, viewed 17 September 2017, www.youtube.com/
watch?v=aIMg21bF_2g.
Curtis, L. 2016a, ‘Chat with me: current favourites, why I’ve “changed” and per-
sonal stories!’, vlog, 1 April, YouTube, viewed 17 September 2017, www.
youtube.com/watch?v=PPWDgWpT-7w.
Curtis, L. 2016b, ‘Storytime: my dating fails’, vlog, 25 July, YouTube, viewed 16
September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JOQl0a3R_Y.
Curtis, L. 2016c ‘Weekly vlog: whaaat did I just eat?!’, vlog, 28 April, YouTube,
viewed 3 May 2019, www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAPzhnJWFYk.
Curtis, L. 2017, ‘The best advice I’ve ever given’, vlog, 25 May, YouTube, viewed
16 September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2HCCAROkpY.
Curtis, L. 2018, ‘The truth about social media’, vlog, 9 April, YouTube, viewed, 6
June 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=mP89KaH-Z0.
Dobson, A.S. 2008, ‘Femininities as commodities: cam girl culture’, in A. Harris
(ed.), Next wave cultures: feminism, subcultures, activism, Routledge, New
York, pp. 123–148.
Dobson, A.S. 2015a, Postfeminist digital cultures: femininity, social media and
self-representation, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Dobson, A.S. 2015b, ‘Girls’ “Pain memes” on YouTube: the production of pain
and femininity on a digital network’, in S. Baker, B. Robards, & B. Buttigieg (eds),
Youth cultures and subcultures: Australian perspectives, Routledge, London,
pp. 173–182.
Dobson, A.S. & Kanai, A. 2018, ‘From “can-do” girls to insecure and angry: affec-
tive dissonances in young women’s post-recessional media’, Feminist Media
Studies, https://10.1080/14680777.2018.1546206.
Dobson, A.S., Carah, N., & Robards, B. 2018, ‘Digital intimate publics and social
media: towards theorising public lives on private platforms’, in A.S. Dobson,
N. Carah, & B. Robards (eds), Digital intimate publics and social media,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 3–27.
Dosekun, S. 2015, ‘For Western girls only? Post-feminism as transnational culture’
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 960–975.
Douglas, K. & Poletti, A. 2016, Life narratives and youth culture representation,
agency and participation, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Driscoll, C. 2018, ‘The girl: dynamics of anxiety and reassurance’, unpublished
paper, presented at the ‘Crossroads in Cultural Studies’ conference, University of
Shanghai, August 12–15.
Duffy, B. 2017, (Not) getting paid to do what you love: gender, social media, and
aspirational work, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
YouTube beauty vlogs 151
Elias, A., Gill, R., & Scharff, C. 2017, ‘Aesthetic labour: beauty politics in neo-
liberalism’, in A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aesthetic labour: rethink-
ing beauty politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke,
pp. 3–49.
Faleatua, R. 2018, ‘Insta brand me: playing with notions of authenticity’, Contin-
uum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 721–732.
Garcia-Rapp, F. 2017, ‘ “Come join and let’s BOND”: authenticity and legitimacy
building on YouTube’s beauty community’, Journal of Media Practice, vol. 18,
no. 2–3, pp. 120–137.
Garcia-Rapp, F. 2018, ‘Trivial and normative? Online fieldwork within YouTube’s
beauty community’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, doi.org/10.1177/
0891241618806974.
Genz, S. 2015, ‘My job is me: postfeminist celebrity culture and the gendering of
authenticity’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 545–561.
Gill, R. 2007, Gender and the media, Polity, London.
Gill, R. 2016, ‘Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times’,
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 610–630.
Gill, R. 2017, ‘The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: a postfemi-
nist sensibility 10 years on’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 20, no. 6,
pp. 606–626.
Gill, R. & Elias, A. 2014, ‘ “Awaken your incredible”: love your body discourses
and postfeminist contradictions’, International Journal of Media and Cultural
Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 179–188.
Gill, R. & Kanai, A. 2018, ‘Mediating neoliberal capitalism: affect, subjectivity
and inequality’, Journal of Communication, vol. 68, pp. 318–326.
Gill, R. & Orgad, S. 2015, ‘The confidence cult(ure)’, Australian Feminist Studies,
vol. 30, no. 86, pp. 324–344.
Gill, R. & Orgad, S. 2017, ‘Confidence culture and the remaking of feminism’,
New Formations, no. 91, pp. 16–34.
Harris, A. 2004, Future girl: young women in the twenty-first century, Routledge,
London.
Harris, A. & Dobson, A.S. 2015, ‘Theorizing agency in post-girlpower times’,
Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 145–156.
Hearn, A. 2012, ‘Brand me “activist” ’, in S. Banet-Weiser & R. Mukherjee (eds),
Commodity activism: cultural resistance in neoliberal times, New York Univer-
sity Press, New York, pp. 23–38.
Hindman, M. 2009, The myth of digital democracy, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, NJ.
Hollows, J. 2000, Feminism, femininity and popular culture, Manchester Univer-
sity Press, Manchester.
Jenkins, H. 2006, Convergence culture: where old and new media collide, New
York University Press, New York.
Jerslev, A. 2016, ‘In the time of the microcelebrity: celebrification and the YouTuber
Zoella’, International Journal of Communication, vol. 10, pp. 5233–5251.
Kanai, A. 2017, ‘Girlfriendship and sameness: affective belonging in a digital
intimate public’, Journal of Gender Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 293–306.
Kanai, A. 2019, Gender and relatability in digital culture: managing affect,
intimacy and value, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Kearney, M. 2006, Girls make media, Routledge, New York.
152 YouTube beauty vlogs
Kearney, M. C. (ed.) 2011, Mediated girlhoods: new explorations of girls’ media
culture, Peter Lang, New York.
Kearney, M.C. 2015, ‘Sparkle: luminosity and post-girl power media, Continuum:
Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 263–273.
Keller, J. 2015, Girls’ feminist blogging in a postfeminist age, Routledge, New York.
Kennedy, U. 2016, ‘Exploring YouTube as a transformative tool in the “The
power of MAKEUP!” movement’, M/C Journal, viewed 20 April 2019, http://
journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/1127.
Lange, P. 2007, ‘Publicly private and privately public: social networking on
YouTube’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 13, no. 1,
pp. 361–380.
Lazar, M. 2017, ‘ “Seriously girly fun!”: recontextualising aesthetic labour as fun
and play in cosmetics advertising’, in A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aes-
thetic labour: rethinking beauty, politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke, pp. 51–66.
Leppert, A. 2015, ‘Keeping up with the Kardashians: fame-work, and the produc-
tion of entrepreneurial sisterhood’, in E. Levine (ed.), Cupcakes, pinterest, and
ladyporn: feminized popular culture in the early 21st century, University of Illi-
nois Press, Champaign, IL, pp. 215–231.
Lewis, T. 2008, Smart living: lifestyle media and popular expertise, Peter Lang,
New York.
Littler, J. 2008, ‘ “I feel your pain”: cosmopolitan charity and the public fashioning
of the celebrity soul’, Social Semiotics, vol. 18. no. 2, pp. 237–251.
Lovelock, M. 2017, ‘ “Is every YouTuber going to make a coming out video
eventually?” YouTube celebrity video bloggers and lesbian and gay identity’,
Celebrity Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 87–103.
Maguire, E. 2015, ‘Self-branding, hotness, and girlhood in the video blogs of Jenna
Marbles’, Biography, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 72–86.
Maguire, E. 2017, Girls, autobiography, media: gender and self mediation in
digital economies, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Mansutti, D. 2014, ‘Bullying and depression: my story’, vlog, 11 December,
YouTube, viewed 7 November 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxshomf8YDg.
Mansutti, D. 2016a, ‘I’m not good enough’, vlog, 17 March, YouTube, viewed,
9 November 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM1nVm95l6Q.
Mansutti, D. 2016b, ‘Living with social anxiety’, vlog, 23 June, YouTube,
viewed,8 November 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ezo-T32KHT8.
Mansutti, D. 2016c, ‘We need to talk about depression’, vlog, 6 October, YouTube,
viewed 7 November 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7cxVI_B_WU.
Mansutti, D. 2017a, ‘Depression and Suicide’, vlog, 22 May 2017, YouTube,
viewed, 9 November 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE1Wab2PrOk.
Mansutti, D. 2017b, ‘Hating your body and unhealthy relationship with food’,
vlog, 15 February, YouTube, viewed 9 November, www.youtube.com/
watch?v=ZF0OIBXndwo.
Mansutti, D. 2017c, ‘Why can’t I have that? Social media & comparing yourself’,
vlog, 24 April, YouTube, viewed 9 November 2017, www.youtube.com/
watch?v=eVRj0byfI2U.
Mansutti, D. 2018, ‘An honest chat about social media & facetune’, vlog, 14 June,
YouTube, viewed1 July 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf41sCwuXDg.
YouTube beauty vlogs 153
Marshall, P. D. 1997, Celebrity and power, University of Minnesota Press, Minne-
apolis, MN.
Marshall, P.D. 2010, ‘The promotion and presentation of the self: celebrity as
marker of presentational media’, Celebrity Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–48.
Marwick, A. 2013, Status update: celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social
media age, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Marwick, A. 2016, ‘You may know me from YouTube (micro-)celebrity in social
media, in P.D. Marshall & S. Redmond (eds), A companion to celebrity, Wiley
Blackwell, London, pp. 333–350.
Marwick, A. & boyd, d. 2011, ‘To see and be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter’,
Convergence, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 139–158.
McDermott, C. 2018, ‘How to survive the postfeminist impasse: Grace Helbig’s
affective aesthetics’, Girlhood Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 50–66.
McRobbie, A. 2009, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change,
Sage, London.
McRobbie, A. 2015, ‘Notes on the perfect: competitive femininity in neoliberal
times’, Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 30, no. 83, pp. 3–20.
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. 2019 Digital feminist activism: girls and
women fight back against rape culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mulvey, L. 1975, ‘Visual pleasure and narrative cinema’, Screen, vol. 16, no. 3,
pp. 6–18.
Nunn, H. & Biressi, A. 2010, ‘ “A trust betrayed”: celebrity and the work of
emotion’, Celebrity Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–64.
Ouellette, L. & Arcy, J. 2015, ‘ “Live through this”: feminist care of the self 2.0’,
Frame, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 95–114.
Ouellette, L. & Hay, J. 2008, ‘Makeover television, governmentality and the good
citizen’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 22, no. 4,
pp. 471–484.
Piepmeier, A. 2009, Girl zines: making media, doing feminism, New York Univer-
sity Press, New York.
Poletti, A. 2017, ‘What’s next? Mediation’, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, vol. 32,
no. 2, pp. 263–266.
Projansky, S. 2007, ‘Mass magazine cover girls: some reflections on postfeminist
girls and postfeminism’s daughters’, in Y. Tasker & D. Negra (eds), Interrogat-
ing postfeminism: gender and the politics of popular culture, Duke University
Press, Durham, NC, pp. 40–72.
Raby, R., Caron, C., Théwissen-LeBlanc, S., Prioletta, J. & Mitchell, C. 2018, ‘Vlog-
ging on YouTube: the online, political engagement of young Canadians advo-
cating for social change’, Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 495–512.
Rak, J. 2015, ‘Life writing versus automedia: the Sims 3 game as a life lab’, Biog-
raphy: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 155–180.
Raun, T. 2018, ‘Capitalizing intimacy: new subcultural forms of microcelebrity
strategies and affective labour on YouTube’, Convergence, vol. 24, no. 1,
pp. 99–113.
Redmond, S. 2008, ‘Pieces of me: celebrity confessional carnality’, Social Semi-
otics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 149–161.
Renstchler, C. 2014, ‘Rape culture and the feminist politics of social media’, Girl-
hood Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 65–82.
Rojek, C. 2001, Celebrity, Reaktion, London.
154 YouTube beauty vlogs
Rojek, C. 2013, ‘Celanthropy, music therapy and “big-citizen” Samaritans’, Celeb-
rity Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 129–143.
Rose, N. 1996, Inventing ourselves: psychology, power and personhood, Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge.
Saunders, B.L. 2018, ‘How to stop caring what other people think of you’, vlog, 9
April, YouTube, viewed 6 June 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDfh59OPgm4.
Scott, L.M. 2006, Fresh lipstick: redressing fashion and feminism, St Martin’s Press,
New York.
Senft, T. 2008, Camgirls: celebrity and community in the age of social networks,
Peter Lang, New York.
Shattuc, J. 1997, The talking cure: TV talk shows and women, Psychology Press,
New York.
Smith, S. & Watson, J. 2015, Reading autobiography: a guide for interpreting life
narratives, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Taylor, A. 2016, Celebrity and the feminist blockbuster, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Tolson, A. 2010, ‘A new authenticity? Communicative practices on YouTube’,
Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 277–289.
Tomkins, S. 2019, forthcoming, ‘ “I can call myself Australian if I want to”:
Natalie Tran and Asian Australian femininity on YouTube’, in A. Taylor &
J. McIntyre (eds), Gender and Australian celebrity culture, Routledge, London.
Turner, G. 2004, Understanding celebrity, Sage, London.
Turner, G. 2010, Ordinary people and the media: the demotic turn, Sage, London.
Turner, G., Bonner, F., & Marshall, P.D. 2000, Fame games: the production of
celebrity in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wengie, 2015, ‘I cried because I couldn’t recognise my parents’, vlog, 19 Novem-
ber, YouTube, viewed 15 September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsgOlE
D6OCg.
White, M. 2015, Producing women: the internet, traditional femininity, queerness,
and creativity, Routledge, New York.
Winch, A. 2013, Girlfriends and postfeminist sisterhood, Palgrave Macmillan, Bas-
ingstoke.
Wolf, N. 1990, The beauty myth: how images of beauty are used against women,
Penguin, New York.
5 Self-help books
Calculating magic as postfeminist
everyday philosophy
Director of Value for Life Pty Ltd; Pitch Consultant and leading edge
Presentation Skills Coach; Executive Coach and Mentor; Author;
Motivational Speaker; Master Practitioner of Neuro-Linguistic Pro-
gramming; Practitioner of Time Line TherapyTM; Certified Master
Practitioner of Matrix Therapies and Hypnotherapy; Certified Neuro-
Linguistic Programming Performance Coach; Accredited Consultant
and Trainer – Extended Disc®.
(2012, p. 249)
People are like magnets. We attract into our lives whatever we give
out and focus on. Whatever we concentrate on, our subconscious
mind helps us to manifest. Even while we are sleeping, our minds are
working on how to make our goals a reality. The fact is what we focus
on we attract and get more of. If you focus on struggling to pay the
mortgage, rent, or bills then that is what you will get – more bills,
more struggle. If you focus on abundance then this is what you will
attract into your life.
(2012, pp. 28–29)
She adds: ‘I learnt that I am good enough, just as I am. Thanks to this
shift, I am now able to say I love my body’ and that her body is ‘beautiful’
just the way it is (2015, p. 7). Her approach to the body is couched in the
feminine and emotive terms of ‘gentle’, ‘love’, ‘beautiful’; similarly, her
relationship to her body is emotional and nurturing: of acceptance and lis-
tening. The mind, however, remains separate from, and controls, the body –
a return to pre-corporeal feminist times.
This emotionalised, even maternal, self–body relationship is replicated
in the relationship between Sepel and her readers, and also parallels the
postfeminist sisterhood we saw constructed by beauty vloggers, based on a
collective but relatively apolitical sense of the travails of young woman-
hood. See, for example, the book’s dedication: ‘To the JSHealth com-
munity. Thank you for being by my side, understanding me, supporting
me and being so passionate about healthy living. We are in this journey
together. I am so proud of you’ (2015). Apart from the intimacy
expressed, the ‘JSHealth community’ is key to understanding Sepel’s
framework. Community seems a somewhat hyperbolic term to use. And
regardless of the soft language of caring and belonging, a branding and
ownership exercise is occurring: this is Jessica Sepel’s health community,
evidence of the contemporary commercialisation of health and fitness
(Maguire 2008, p. 5). We soon return to this uneasy nexus of femininity
and commerce.
A similarly uneasy combination occurs in Sepel’s prescription for a
healthy life: a mix of detailed nutritional science and the soft, semi/quasi
spiritual feminine philosophy characterising many of our self-help texts,
and which is health and fitness’s version of calculating magic. Sepel offers
‘a complete plan’ to the healthy life comprising these two elements. ‘Plan’
is the operative word here. Regardless of her claimed rejection of perfec-
tionism, she offers a pedagogy of rigorous self-policing enacted through
nutrition. First, the reader fills in a questionnaire to ascertain where they
are located, not so much in terms of health and body image, but rather,
existentially. Questions include ‘At what point in your life did you feel
your best?’ and ‘Do you feel incredibly alive and present in your life?’
168 Self-help books
(2015, p. 10). This questionnaire becomes a benchmark of the reader’s
progress. Sepel includes a ‘Commitment Contract’ with vows such as ‘I
promise to embark on this health journey with optimism. I am dedicated
to making health a priority – the number one priority – in my life’ (2015,
p. 11). She later includes a food diary (2015, p. 116), a self-love planner!
(2015, p. 119), and a ‘7-day slim-down meal plan’ (2015, p. 120). These
self-monitoring devices are complemented by lengthy nutritional informa-
tion in which the natural is a primary value. As in the case of self-
actualisation books, attaining Sepel’s healthy life is a serious, organised,
and complicated quest.
Her philosophy of the healthy life, however, moderates this scientism
and self-discipline. She draws upon the usual elements of contemporary
women’s self-actualisation: the power of the mind; techniques of medita-
tion and visualisation of dreams; finding your passion; following your
heart and intuition; using mantras; acknowledging a spiritual dimension to
the self; and a soft feminist politics. She declares that ‘I want to empower
women to support each other, not tear each other down’ (2015, p. 314),
another articulation of postfeminist sisterhood that we observe within and
across genres. Sepel’s good nutrition plan is holistic and transformative.
Body and soul are mutually informing; consequently, the plan requires the
‘soul’ to be explored, understood, and reformed using the abovementioned
techniques. In return, the plan enables a transformation in lifestyle that
affects both body and soul. Good health, therefore, is more than bodily: it
has a strongly moral and semi-spiritual dimension, a revelation of the
authentic self. As she ends her welcome, she is now ‘free from everything
that was holding me back. (2015, p. 8).
This feminine philosophy masks the entrepreneurialism and commer-
cialism of the endeavour. Sepel’s experiences and knowledge not only
result in a book, but also in a cottage industry, including a health blog,
and work as a nutritionist and wellness coach. We do not want to discount
the often practical and reasonable advice Sepel offers her readers; we are
more interested in the conflicted nature of the text’s semioscape, in which
soft feminism (its use of sisterhood to liberate us from low self-esteem and
poor body image), a feminine philosophy of the everyday, nutritional
science, self-improvement, and twenty-first-century commerce intermingle
in what Sepel terms her ‘health brand’ (2015, p. 314). Sepel’s corporeal
version of calculating magic genuinely wants to free us from the oppres-
sion represented by diet books and glossy images of female perfection;
however, the terms of her philosophy subject the female body to another
form of control.
The recent reclamation of the female body as a strong and fit body, as
seen in phenomena such as #fitspo (Riley & Evans 2018), women’s
running groups, and the uptake of weight training by women, appears to
mark progress for conceptions and practices of female embodiment: we are
no longer victims of our bodies. Our reading of Roper’s Lighten Up: A
Self-help books 169
Female’s Modern Day Guide to Physical Transformation (2013) shows
something more problematic. While Hayley focuses on exercise rather than
food, her text shares a number of characteristics with Sepel’s. As the title
suggests, this is not only a book about diet and exercise. It also promises
transformation of the self – an exercise-based version of Gill’s makeover
trope (2007b). Roper offers the body as capable of complete change;
accordingly, she takes a holistic approach. In postfeminist health and
fitness guides for women, for example, you do not just limit your goals to
weight loss or improved muscular strength. Instead, the body and the mind
must both be involved, and this combination requires an informing philo-
sophy. Lighten Up therefore constructs a philosophy of the self that is
fundamental to improved diet and exercise, and which in turn allows
women to reclaim their bodies.
This philosophy is apparent from the opening pages, where Roper
declares that:
[this book] will take you on a physical and spiritual journey with the
end result being so much more than just a slimmer and healthier
version of your former self. You will finish this book with not only the
tools to change your body, but also the tools to change your life.
(2013)
Accordingly, the first two chapters of the book are ‘The Inner Voice’ and
‘Tune Into Your Soul’, replicating Sepel’s mind–body split. In these, Roper
instructs us how to listen to our inner voice as a path to spiritual and then
physical enlightenment: the inner voice is ‘our soul or spirit. It is the real
you’ (2013, p. 9). Doing so means we are more in alignment with the uni-
verse, and therefore less likely to indulge in negative behaviour, such as
poor eating or being unmotivated. In what is something of a postfeminist
moral code, she restates the core elements of self-actualisation philosophy:
think positive thoughts, do daily good deeds, live in the present, practice
visualisation, and so forth. This dictate suggests that women have a moral,
even spiritual, rather than hedonistic relationship to the body. The goal of
her philosophy is more than health or fitness, it is ‘to have women bursting
with energy, happiness and positivity’ (2013, p. 4). This reworked female
body exemplifies the neoliberal ‘new vitalism’ theorised by Rose (2009,
pp. 49, 63, 70), whereby the individual is responsible for self-care, and
also a specifically female version of this vitalism, which Tasker and Negra
argue actually masks a social death – of once-sustaining institutions such
as welfare and public health (2007, p. 9).
The exercise and diet section – in which a fairly typical set of exercise
routines and eating guidelines is described – is something of a let-down
after the metaphysics of the preceding chapters. Like Sepel, ‘natural’ foods
are valorised, and exercise equates with toning exercises and fat-burning
cardiovascular work rather than muscle-building regimes so as to achieve a
170 Self-help books
conventionally feminine figure – the bodily ideal of contemporary women’s
health and fitness (Markula & Kennedy 2011, p. 4). The magical elements
of self-actualisation also play their part. For instance, Roper notes the
importance of visualising the body you want to achieve: ‘Focus on the area
you want to change … and imagine it decreasing in size or changing in
shape’ (2013, p. 58). Although this sounds enticing, it is also a good
example of McGee’s belaboured self: it is now a reasonable requirement
that intense and constant mental as well as physical work is performed
upon the female body in order to achieve the supposed goal of realisation.
Like Sepel, Roper displays a strong entrepreneurial and commercial
imperative that is softened by the self-actualisation philosophy, emotional-
ism, and pro-woman stance. The opening sentences in her introduction lit-
eralise these intermingled discourses:
It began following a vivid dream one night, after which I woke up and
decided that I was no longer going to be defined by ‘tired mum’ syn-
drome. I was not going to allow myself the luxury of wallowing in
tiredness and playing the harassed, worn-out mum card again. What if
I was to approach each day with a sense of grace and playfulness?
What if the next time someone asked me how I was feeling, I was to
reply ‘exuberant’, ‘enlightened’ or, God forbid, ‘sexy’?
(2008, p. 9)
From that moment she realises she ‘had choices and was about to waste no
time in exercising them’ (2008, p. 9). As we saw in earlier examples, will-
power and choice here are paramount to becoming a sexy, postfeminist
mother. Hedley-Ward decides she has to renounce her pre-motherhood
identity of tertiary-educated marketing professional with a successful inter-
national career (her words), and instead embrace motherhood – by chang-
ing her attitude:
who have stifled their feminine side in a bid to achieve worldly status
and rewards, the journey back to femininity and all things womanly in
the traditional sense can be most liberating. Far from feeling down-
trodden and resentful, once I took over the role of master of my home
and leader of my family’s emotional well-being I felt liberated beyond
174 Self-help books
belief. I felt truly in touch with the essence of who I was and why I
was here, and relieved that I didn’t have to prove myself in a corporate
way any longer.
(Hedley-Ward 2008, pp. 20–21)
Learn how to give yourself the love and respect you deserve and watch
as you blossom into an exciting, vibrant expression of the new you –
one that is stronger and infinitely more beautiful now that you have
added ‘mother’ to your resume.
(2008, p. 7)
Notes
1 See also Youyou Zhou’s 2017 analysis of Goodreads data.
2 The implied female readership is suggested by the titles of books (e.g. A
Woman’s Guide to …), cover illustrations, modes of addressing the reader (‘okay
girl, go for it!’), and/or topics covered (such as motherhood and female sexual-
ity). The four sub-genres we examine – self-actualisation, health and fitness,
mothering advice, and career help – imply a particular age-related, racially
unmarked, and amorphously middle-class demographic – to which we return.
Health and fitness and mothering advice, for instance, targets 18 to 45 year
olds (or young to mature women), while the guides to career and self-actualisa-
tion aim at a slightly older readership of mature to middle-aged women. Note
that each sub-genre, however, also contains texts that address other reader-
ships, such as health and fitness guides for elderly women, suggesting the
expansion and broad appeal of self-help.
3 Munford and Waters (2014, p. 30) similarly observe postfeminism’s palimpses-
tic relationship with feminism.
Self-help books 181
4 Illouz observes that ‘feminism was one of the major political and cultural for-
mations to adopt the therapeutic discourse, as early as the 1920s and most
forcefully in the 1970s’ (2008, p. 167).
5 He chooses Janette Rainwater (1989), Self-Therapy: A Guide to Becoming
Your Own Therapist, HarperCollins, London.
6 We examined the National Library of Australia’s (NLA) holdings. The Copy-
right Act 1968 states that Australian publishers should provide a deposit copy
of every book published to the NLA, whether print or electronic, industry or
self-published. The NLA’s holdings, therefore, are a reasonable indicator of
Australian publishing.
7 Tom O’Regan’s 2007 work on personal financial advice, and Catherine
R. Delin and Peter S. Delin’s 1994 analysis of Australian readers of self-help
books are two exceptions.
8 These figures are based on research that was conducted in February 2016.
9 See Steve Salerno (2005) for a journalistic exposé of the US self-help industry.
10 See Lea Gay’s Attitude Goddess: Every Woman’s Guide to Having it All!
(2008), Danette Hibberd’s How to Find the Goddess in You (2008), or Melissa
Scott’s compilation, The Enlightened Goddess: Life Changing Secrets of
Soulful Women (2009), amongst others.
11 See Sam Binkley (2011) or Barbara Ehrenreich (2009) for detailed accounts of
the contemporary power of positive thinking.
12 Two examples are Ita Buttrose and Lee Campbell’s Get in Shape (2007) or
Fiona Thomas Hargreaves’s Fit and Fabulous for Life after Babies (2009).
13 Although in America, Title IX – a major breakthrough for women in sport –
was passed into law in 1972.
14 Other examples include Kerry Townsend (2009), Mother’s Essential Toolkit;
Christie Nicholas (2011), The Mum Who Roared: A Complete A-Z Guide to
Loving Your Mind, Body and Attitude; Eunice Hunter (2012), Have Fun and
Make Money: An Easy Guide to Social Selling for Mums Who Want to Work
from Home; and Dijanna Mulhearn (2014), Wardrobe 101 for Mums: Fashion
Formulas for Modern Mothers.
15 We should note, however, that there is a plethora of career advice authored by
state and federal governments taking non-book form, though this is usually
aimed at younger women and girls.
16 Gill et al.’s (2017) study of the permeation of postfeminist thought in the
workplace makes similar findings: gender inequality is presented as an individ-
ualised issue rather than a structural one.
References
Adamson, M. 2017, ‘Postfeminism, neoliberalism and a “successfully” balanced
femininity in celebrity CEO autobiographies’, Gender, Work & Organization,
vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 314–327.
Adamson, M. & Salmenniemi, S. 2017, ‘ “The bottom line is that the problem is
you”: aesthetic labour, postfeminism and subjectivity in Russian self-help liter-
ature’, in A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aesthetic labour: beauty politics in
neoliberalism, Palgrave, London, pp. 301–316.
Ahmed, S. 2010, The promise of happiness, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Allen, K. & Osgood, J. 2009, ‘Young women negotiating maternal subjectivities:
the significance of social class’, Studies in the Maternal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–17.
Binkley, S. 2011, ‘Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal
governmentality’, Subjectivity, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 371–394.
182 Self-help books
Binkley, S. 2014, Happiness as enterprise: an essay on neoliberal life, State Univer-
sity of New York Press, Albany, NY.
Blum, B. 2018, ‘The self-help hermeneutic: its global history and literary future’,
PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, vol. 133,
no. 5, pp. 1099–1117.
Boston Women’s Health Course Collective 1971, Our bodies, our selves: a course
by and for women, New England Free Press, Boston, MA.
Bottrell, D. 2013, ‘Responsibilised resilience? Reworking neoliberal social policy
texts’, M/C journal, vol. 16, no. 5, viewed 20 April 2019, http://journal.media-
culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/708/0.
Braidotti, R. 1994, Nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in con-
temporary feminist theory, Columbia University Press, New York.
Brown, W. 2009, ‘Neoliberalism and the end of liberal democracy’, in W. Brown
(ed.), Edgework: critical essays on knowledge and politics, Princeton University
Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 37–59.
Burrows, J. 2012, ‘Your language – the power of words’, in J. Gibson (comp.) You
can … live the life of your dreams: an inspirational 10 week program to turn
your dreams into reality, Ability Press, Keysborough, pp. 73–90.
Buttrose, I. & Campbell, L. 2007, Get in shape: a complete workout for strength,
health and vitality, Penguin, Camberwell.
Castles, F.G. 2001, ‘A farewell to Australia’s welfare state’, International Journal
of Health Services, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 537–544.
Cherry, S. 2008, ‘The ontology of a self-help book: a paradox of its own exist-
ence’, Social Semiotics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 337–348.
Chodorow, N. 1978, The reproduction of mothering: psychoanalysis and the soci-
ology of gender, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
De Benedictis, S. & Orgad, S. 2017, ‘The escalating price of motherhood: aesthetic
labour in popular representations of “stay-at-home” mothers’, in A. Elias,
R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aesthetic labour: rethinking beauty politics in neo-
liberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 101–116.
DeFrancisco, V.L. & O’Connor, P. 1995, ‘A feminist critique of self-help books on
heterosexual romance’, Women’s Studies in Communication, vol. 18, no. 2,
pp. 217–227.
Delin, C.R. & Delin, P.S. 1994, ‘Self-selection of self-help reading: readers and
reasons’, Australian Psychologist, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 201–206.
Dubberly, E. 2006, Whip your life into shape, Murdoch Books, Millers Point.
Ebben, M. 1995, ‘Off the shelf salvation: a feminist critique of self-help’, Women’s
Studies in Communication, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 111–122.
Ehrenreich, B. 2009, Bright-sided: how the relentless promotion of positive think-
ing has undermined America, Metropolitan Books, New York.
Elias, A., Gill, R., & Scharff, C. 2017, ‘Aesthetic labour: beauty politics in neo-
liberalism’, in A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aesthetic labour: rethinking
beauty politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 3–49.
Evans, A. & Riley, S. 2013, ‘Immaculate consumption: negotiating the sex symbol
in postfeminist celebrity culture’, Journal of Gender Studies, vol. 22, no. 3,
pp. 268–281.
Faludi, S. 1991, Backlash: the undeclared war against American women, Crown,
New York.
Self-help books 183
Favaro, L. 2017, ‘ “Just be confident girls!”: confidence chic as neoliberal govern-
mentality’, in A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (eds), Aesthetic labour: rethinking
beauty politics in neoliberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 283–299.
French, M. 1977, The women’s room, Summit Books, New York.
Friedan, B. 1963, The feminine mystique, Gollancz, London.
Furedi, F. 2004, Therapy culture: cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age,
Routledge, London.
Gatens, M. 1995, Imaginary bodies: ethics, power, and corporeality, Routledge,
New York.
Gay, L. 2008, Attitude goddess: every woman’s guide to having it all!, Women
with Attitude, Mooloolah.
Genz, S. 2008, ‘ “I’m not a housewife, but …”: postfeminism and the revival of
domesticity’, in S. Gillis & J. Hollows (eds), Feminism, domesticity and popular
culture, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 49–64.
Genz, S. 2009, Postfemininities in popular culture, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Genz, S. 2010, ‘Singled out: postfeminism’s “new woman” and the dilemma of
having it all’, Journal of Popular Culture, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 97–119.
Gibson, J. 2012, You can … Live the life of your dreams: an inspirational 10 week
program to turn your dreams into reality, Ability Press, Keysborough.
Giddens, A. 1991, Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern
age, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Gill, R. 2007a, Gender and the media, Polity, Cambridge.
Gill, R. 2007b, ‘Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility’, European
Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–166.
Gill, R. 2016, ‘Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times’,
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 610–630.
Gill, R. & Elias, A. 2014, ‘ “Awaken your incredible”: love your body discourses
and postfeminist contradictions’, International Journal of Media and Cultural
Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 179–188.
Gill, R. & Orgad, S. 2015, ‘The confidence cult(ure)’, Australian Feminist Studies,
vol. 30, no. 86, pp. 324–344.
Gill, R., Kelan, E., & Scharff, C. 2017, ‘A postfeminist sensibility at work’,
Gender, work & organization, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 226–244.
Grodin, D. 1995, ‘Women reading self-help: themes of separation and connection’,
Women’s Studies in Communication, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 123–134.
Grosz, E. & Probyn, E. (eds) 1995, Sexy bodies: the strange carnalities of fem-
inism, Routledge, London.
Grosz, E.A. 1994, Volatile bodies: toward a corporeal feminism, Allen & Unwin,
St. Leonards.
Hargraves, F.T. 2009, Fit and fabulous for a life after babies, Allen & Unwin,
Crows Nest.
Hazleden, R. 2003, ‘Love yourself: the relationship of the self with itself in popular
self-help texts’, Journal of Sociology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 413–428.
Hedley-Ward, J. 2008, You sexy mother: a life-changing approach to motherhood,
Exisle, Wollombi.
Hibberd, D. 2008, How to find the goddess in you, FBF Media, Greystanes.
Hochschild, A.R. 1994, ‘The commercial spirit of intimate life and the abduction
of feminism: signs from women’s advice books’, Theory, Culture and Society,
vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–24.
184 Self-help books
Hunter, E. 2012, Have fun and make money: an easy guide to social selling for
mums who want to work from home, Global Publishing Group, Mt Evelyn.
Illouz, E. 2008, Saving the modern soul: therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-
help, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Kanai, A. 2017, ‘Beyond repudiation: the affective instrumentalisation of feminism
in girlfriendly spaces’, Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 32, no. 93, pp. 240–258.
Kingston, A. 2004, The meaning of wife, Piatkus, London.
Lazar, M.M. 2009, ‘Entitled to consume: postfeminist femininity and a culture of
post-critique’, Discourse and Communication, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 371–400.
Leonard, S. 2007, ‘ “I hate my job. I hate everybody here!”: adultery, boredom, and
the “working girl” in twenty-first-century American cinema’, in Y. Tasker & D.
Negra (eds), Interrogating postfeminism: gender and the politics of popular
culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 100–131.
Littler, J. 2013, ‘The rise of the “yummy mummy”: popular conservatism and the
neoliberal maternal in contemporary British culture’, Communication, Culture
& Critique, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 227–243.
Maguire, J.S. 2008, Fit for consumption: sociology and the business of fitness,
Routledge, London.
Markula P. & Kennedy, E. 2011, ‘Introduction: beyond binaries: contemporary
approaches to women and exercise’, in E. Kennedy & P. Markula (eds),
Women and exercise: the body, health, and consumerism, Routledge, New
York, pp. 1–25.
Martin-McDonald, K. 2015, Energise your career: a guide to how any woman can
have the success she wants, Global Publishing Group, Mt Evelyn.
Marwick, A.E. 2013, Status update: celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social
media age, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
McGee, M. 2005, Self-help inc.: makeover culture in American life, Oxford
University Press, New York.
McRobbie, A. 2004, ‘Post-feminism and popular culture’, Feminist Media Studies,
vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 255–264.
McRobbie, A. 2007, ‘TOP GIRLS? Young women and the post-feminist sexual
contract’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 4–5, pp. 718–737.
McRobbie, A. 2009, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change,
Sage, London.
McRobbie, A. 2015, ‘Notes on the perfect: competitive femininity in neoliberal
times’, Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 3, no. 83, pp. 3–20.
Miller, T. & McHoul, A. 1998, ‘Helping the self’, Social Text, vol. 57, Winter,
pp. 127–155.
Mulhearn, D. 2014, Wardrobe 101 for mums: fashion formulas for modern
mothers, Thames & Hudson Australia, Fishermans Bend.
Munford, R. & Waters, M. 2014, Feminism and popular culture: investigating the
postfeminist mystique, Rutgers University Press, New York.
Murdoch, K.M. 2001, ‘What does John Gray have to say to feminism?’, Contin-
uum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 159–167.
Negra, D. 2009, What a girl wants? Fantasizing the reclamation of self in postfem-
inism, Routledge, London.
Negra, D. 2014, Claiming feminism: commentary, autobiography and advice liter-
ature for women in the recession’, Journal of Gender Studies, vol. 23, no. 3,
pp. 275–286.
Self-help books 185
Negra, D. & Tasker, Y. 2014, ‘Introduction: gender and recessionary culture’, in
D. Negra & Y. Tasker (eds), Gendering the recession: media and culture in an
age of austerity, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 1–30.
Nehring, D. 2016, Transnational popular psychology and the global self-help indus-
try: the politics of contemporary social change, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Nicholas, C. 2011, The mum who roared: a complete a-z guide to loving your
mind, body and attitude after baby, Exisle Publishing, Wollombi.
Oakley, A. 1974, The sociology of housework, Pantheon Books, London.
Orbach, S. 1979, Fat is a feminist issue: how to lose weight permanently – without
dieting, Hamlyn Paperbacks, Feltham.
O’Regan, T. 2007, ‘Capitalising on anxiety: financial literacy and the publishing
industry’, in D. Carter & A. Galligan (eds), Making books: contemporary
Australian publishing, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, pp. 315–332.
Pocock, B. 2003, The work/life collision: what work is doing to Australians and
what to do about it, The Federation Press, Annandale.
Press, A. & Strathman, T. 1993, ‘Work, family, and social class in television
images of women: prime-time television and the construction of postfeminism’,
Women and Language, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 7–27.
Probyn, E. 1990, ‘New traditionalism and post-feminism: TV does the home’,
Screen, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 147–159.
Rainwater, J. 1989, Self-Therapy: a guide to becoming your own therapist,
HarperCollins, London.
Riley, S. & Evans, A. 2018, ‘Lean light fit and tight: fitblr blogs and the postfemi-
nist transformation imperative’, in K. Toffoletti, H. Thorpe, & J. Francombe-
Webb (eds), New sporting femininities: embodied politics in postfeminist times,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke pp. 207–229.
Rimke, H.M. 2000, ‘Governing citizens through self-help literature’, Cultural
Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 61–78.
Roper, H. 2013, Lighten up: a female’s modern day guide to physical transforma-
tion, Palmer Higgs.
Rose, N. 1992, ‘Governing the enterprising self’, in P. Heelas & P. Morris (eds),
The values of the enterprise culture, Routledge, London, pp. 141–164.
Rose, N. 1996, ‘Governing “advanced” liberal democracies’, in J. Van Dijck (ed.),
Foucault and political reason, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 37–64.
Rose, N. 2009, The politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in
the twenty-first century, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Rottenberg, C. 2014, ‘The rise of neoliberal feminism’, Cultural Studies, vol. 28,
no. 3, pp. 418–437.
Salecl, R. 2009, ‘Society of choice’, Differences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 157–180.
Salerno, S. 2005, Sham: how the self-help movement made America helpless, Three
Rivers Press, New York.
Sandberg, S. 2013, Lean in: women, work and the will to succeed, Alfred
A. Knopf, New York.
Schrager, C.D. 1993, ‘Questioning the promise of self-help: a reading of Women
who love too much’, Feminist Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 176–192.
Scott, M. (ed.) 2009, The enlightened goddess: life changing secrets of soulful
women, Equinox Life Coaching, Mornington.
Sepel J. 2015, The healthy life: a complete plan for glowing skin, a healthy gut,
weight loss, better sleep and less stress, Pan Macmillan, Sydney.
186 Self-help books
Simonds, W. 1992, Women and self-help culture: reading between the lines,
Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
Starker, S. 1989, Oracle at the supermarket: the American preoccupation with self-
help books, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
Swan, E. 2017, ‘Postfeminist stylistics, work femininities and coaching: a multi-
modal study of a website’, Gender, Work and Organization, vol. 24, no. 3,
pp. 274–296.
Tasker Y. & Negra, D. 2007, ‘Introduction: Feminist politics and postfeminist
culture’, in Y. Tasker & D. Negra (eds), Interrogating postfeminism: gender and
the politics of popular culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 1–25.
Taylor, A. 2012, Single women in popular culture: the limits of postfeminism,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Taylor, A. 2016, Celebrity and the feminist blockbuster, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Tiaynen-Qadir, T. & Salmenniemi, S. 2017, ‘Self-help as a glocalised therapeutic
assemblage’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 381–396.
Toffoletti, K., Thorpe, H., & Francombe-Webb, J. (eds) 2018, New sporting femi-
ninities: embodied politics in postfeminist times, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Townsend, K. 2009, Mother’s essential personal toolkit: tips, tools and techniques
to help your inner butterfly flourish, Mostly for Mothers, Capalaba.
Tsaousi, C. 2015, ‘How to organise your body 101: postfeminism and the (re)con-
struction of the female body through How to look good naked’, Media, Culture
and Society, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 145–158.
Van Gellecum, Y., Baxter, J., & Western, M. 2008, ‘Neoliberalism, gender
inequality and the Australian labour market’, Journal of Sociology, vol. 44, no. 1,
pp. 45–63.
Vavrus, M.D. 2007, ‘Opting out moms in the news: selling new traditionalism in
the new millennium’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–63.
Wesson, S.C. 2015, Evolving women, Sue C. Wesson, Lithgow.
Whelehan, I. 2000, Overloaded: popular culture and the future of feminism, The
Women’s Press, London.
Wiest, A., Andrews, D., & Giardina, M. 2015, ‘Training the body for healthism:
reifying vitality in and through the clinical gaze of the neoliberal fitness club’,
Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 21–40.
Winch, A. 2013, Girlfriends and postfeminist sisterhood, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Zhou, Y. 2017, ‘Goodreads data show that women reading self-help books are
getting advice from men’, viewed 1 March 2019 https://qz.com/1106341/most-
women-reading-self-help-books-are-getting-advice-from-men/.
6 Political journalism
Women leaders, constrained power,
and the rhetoric of post-gender
I find that for the under-30s women … the feminist battle has been
won. That is not an issue. Of course, a woman has a right to a career.
Of course, women are as good as men. Of course, they are entitled to
the same promotion and they can do it [the job] as well.
For Howard, who publicly invoked the term a number of times during his
leadership, ‘postfeminism’ signals the way in which women no longer feel
encumbered by feminism and can now freely ‘choose’ to embrace marriage
and motherhood. His definition, therefore, is consistent with the idea of
postfeminism as a reclamation of the pleasures that feminism had pro-
hibited, as well as a retreatist vision that reprioritises women’s roles in the
domestic sphere (McRobbie 2009; Negra 2009); a form of what Elspeth
Probyn (1990) has analysed as the ‘new traditionalism’, which sees tradi-
tional gender roles recoded as individualised ‘choice’. As Howard told the
Sunday Telegraph, in a later article unambiguously entitled ‘Feminism
dead’ (Akerman 2006), ‘Fortunately, I think today’s younger women are
more in the post-feminist period, where they don’t sort of measure their
independence and freedom by the number of years they remain full-time in
the workforce without having children’ (in Akerman 2006). If we accept
the position that ‘postfeminist culture presents the view that women’s
equal worth and equal rights have been established beyond doubt’ (Hall &
Donaghue 2013, p. 250), coupled with the centrality of ‘choice’ discourses
and the revalorisation of matrimonial and maternal subjectivities for
Political journalism 193
women (Negra 2009; Taylor 2012), then Howard’s comments clearly align
with such a notion. The first figure we analyse in terms of these prevalent
postfeminist tropes and discourses is the populist Pauline Hanson.
I feel for these women. I wore that burqa for half an hour and I
couldn’t wait to get it off … And yet we expect women to wear it in our
climate, covered up. Why? Because they’re being forced to, by men?
(In Elton-Pym 2017)
Nice girls don’t carry knives. So Julia Gillard, who has arrived in the
prime ministership with the image of the clean, fair player, knows she
has to be persuasive in explaining how she came to plunge one into
Kevin’s neck.14
The Lady Macbeth trope was a recurrent one (Hartcher 2012), and her
ascension to power, and her (albeit precarious) leadership, was seen ‘as a
deeply transgressive performance of femininity’ (Johnson 2015, p. 304).
Throughout her tenure, the public criticism of Gillard was fierce; as
Varney notes, ‘an avowedly anti-feminist media placed itself in the service
of the neoliberal backlash against the carbon and other taxes that she
introduced’ (2017, p. 31, original emphasis). As part of the failure to
recognise the legitimacy of her leadership, Gillard, as many critics have
demonstrated, faced some of the most vile, outrageously sexist insults
during her time in public office. Although, of course, misogyny is not
merely an Australian phenomenon, and impacts political women especially
– witness Hillary Clinton’s treatment in the media (Bordo 2017) – in
Australia it is clearly tied to those masculinist national mythologies dis-
cussed earlier (Holland & Wright 2017; Taylor 2019). In a remarkable
sign of self-control (and perhaps astute self-branding), Gillard chose to
publicly ignore what Anne Summers (2013) dubs the ‘misogyny factor’
until her October 2012 speech. For some, this tells us much about the
operations of postfeminist logic. In a postfeminist discursive framework,
‘Being offended by sexism is positioned as a “choice”, and a woman can
enhance her capital by showing herself to be unaffected by sexism’
(Donaghue 2015, p. 164). Gillard’s ‘choice’ to not make an issue of the
sexism she was experiencing – that is, until the misogyny speech – renders
her, for Donaghue, ‘a post-feminist Prime Minister’ (2015, p. 164).
Women politicians need to carefully negotiate their public talk about
gender (Sorrentino et al. 2019), even more so in a postfeminist discursive
environment. In this respect, key to Gillard’s self-construction, and to her
refusal of the ‘deviancy’ commonly attached to women politicians (Ross &
Sreberny-Mohammadi 1997, p. 104), is the idea of ‘getting on with it’
(Goldsworthy 2014), evidence that ‘Gillard was well aware that her gender
could be used against her’, something she sought to manage by simply
refusing to acknowledge that it mattered at all (Johnson 2015, p. 300). As
Jasmin Sorrentino and Martha Augoustinos (2012, p. 385) argue, ‘Gillard
202 Political journalism
worked to strategically mitigate her gender as merely inconsequential to
her role as Prime Minister’. She refused to foreground her gender, or her
remarkable achievement, performing a rhetorical move common to female
politicians – especially conservative women like Margaret Thatcher (Nunn
2002): ‘I never conceptualise my prime ministership around being the first
woman to be doing this job’ (in Goldsworthy 2014, p. 64). Consistent
with postfeminism, she also sought to frame her personal success as evid-
ence of women’s transformed status in Australian society, thereby down-
playing the need for any further structural changes (Hall & Donaghue
2013, p. 641). In this vein, a Sydney Morning Herald article quotes her
distancing herself from any overtly feminist goals: ‘Gillard says she “didn’t
set out to crash my head on any glass ceilings” ’ (Murphy 2010). Signifi-
cantly, since leaving office (and arguably able to exercise more control
over her public persona) she has conceded that this refusal to acknowledge
the role of gender in terms of how she was being represented, and how she
was able to represent herself, was misguided (Gillard 2014). Her feminism,
too, has since become much less ambivalent (Taylor, forthcoming).
While feminist identification by celebrities seems entirely normalised
(and indeed is now expected for women as part of building a viable
brand), it continues to have negative consequences for political women
(see Lonie 2019). In recognition of this, Gillard repeatedly worked to act-
ively distance herself from feminism (Hall & Donaghue 2013, p. 641),
itself by no means a unique strategy for women leaders. For example, a
journalist in the Australian emphasises that Gillard ‘avoided being the fem-
inist poster girl’ because of the push back other prominent feminist Labor
women had encountered: ‘Gillard was again careful to distance herself
from any feminist symbolism by arguing her pursuit of power has been
about fairness and hard work, not smashing the glass ceiling’ (Karvelas
2010).15 Here, Gillard’s tactics of self-representation are laid bare, and
found to have been successful. Furthermore, as well as potentially alienat-
ing voters (Hall & Donaghue 2013, p. 641), the ‘blokey’ culture of the
ALP – ‘a party still essentially run by and for mates, usually defined on
male terms’ (Cox 2013) – may also have been a factor in this reluctance to
publicly identify as a feminist or indeed to draw attention to her gender.
Such efforts, of course, were ultimately unsuccessful, and Gillard was
unable to ignore the ways in which gendered assumptions shaped the way
she was being discursively constructed, including by her political oppon-
ents. The ‘misogyny speech’, the next flashpoint examined here, marked ‘a
turning point in Gillard’s own performance as a recognizable gendered
[and feminist] being’ (Appleby 2015, p. 153).
Here, as Varney (2017, p. 27) argues, drawing upon the work of Judith
Butler, Gillard makes explicit the extent of the ‘injurious force’ of Abbott’s
utterances, giving her speech an intense affective power. Most important
for our purposes is the claiming of a clearly feminist subject position. As
Kate Chapple (2014, p. 7) argues, through the speech ‘Gillard had
unleashed her feminist voice, a voice that was hitherto unknown to the
Australian electorate’.
Gillard’s speech effectively punctured postfeminist assumptions about
feminism’s unmitigated success and the successful relegation of overt
sexism to the past (Donaghue 2015), exposing the ‘sexism which is so
deeply embedded in the Australian body politic’ (Pini in Rourke 2012) and
which works to place significant limits on women’s power. For a woman
in the public sphere, let alone the Prime Minister, to publicly contest the
sexism and misogyny that continues to pervade Australian public life was
remarkable, and most certainly newsworthy. Though international media
coverage was extensive, and largely supportive (Barnett 2012; Lester 2012;
Morrissey 2012) – propelling Gillard ‘to the status of global feminist icon’
(Wright & Holland 2014, p. 455) – local news media was more hostile
and sceptical of the political motivation behind Gillard’s publicly per-
formed feminism.16 Journalistic responses to the speech saw a number of
problematic gendered assumptions being invoked, including that Gillard
was overly emotional and hysterical (Wright & Holland 2014, p. 463), or
– as one journalist characterised the speech – ‘shrill and strident’ (Shana-
han 2012). In line with the idea that her feminist ire was politically manu-
factured, her speech was also seen as ‘inauthentic’ (Devine 2012), as she
‘feigned outrage’ and ‘pretended to be upset’ (Campbell 2012). In sharp
contrast to the public response to the speech, another journalist later
labelled it ‘fake feminism’ (Albrechtsen 2013).
204 Political journalism
As many feminist scholars – along with Gillard (2014) herself – have
emphasised (Sorrentino & Augoustinos 2012; Donaghue 2015; Johnson
2015; Trimble 2016, 2017; Worth et al. 2016), the pejorative phrase
‘playing the gender card’ circulated widely in press coverage, a gesture which
sought to undermine the affective power of Gillard’s ‘political rage and
passion’ (Varney 2017, p. 35). Newspaper article titles are indicative here:
‘Gillard reveals true nature in playing the gender card’ (Sheehan 2012) and
‘Gender card is a loser for Gillard’ (Devine 2012). For feminist critics, and
indeed the wider Australian public, the speech represented ‘a resistant fem-
inist performance’ (Varney 2017, p. 35), yet in the context of its media
reception it was refigured as a cynical, and indeed instrumentalist (Wright &
Holland 2014, p. 462), gesture. For journalists, conservative and progressive
alike, Gillard’s public feminist identification – her ‘gender opportunism’
(Maley 2013) – at that particular temporal juncture was entirely at odds
with many of her own policy initiatives, including those that disadvantaged
single mothers (Maley 2013), and attempted to mask her government’s defi-
ciencies: ‘Gender card hides failures’ (Pearson 2012) and ‘Julia Gillard is no
feminist hero’ (Pilger 2012;17 see also Sheehan 2012; Taylor 2012).18 Sim-
ilarly, in the Australian newspaper, Dennis Shanahan (2012) framed the
speech as an ‘attempt to destroy Abbott instead of concentrating on govern-
ing’, with the Opposition leader being positioned as a ‘good Aussie bloke’
under siege (Holland & Wright 2017).
Such reactions, given they seek to forestall a more productive feminist
dialogue, are testament to the disruptive potentialities of such a perfor-
mance. Further, given that her speech was made as she spoke against a
motion to remove the Speaker of the House, Peter Slipper, due to allega-
tions that he had sent offensive, sexualised text messages (including those
that were degrading to women) to his male staff member, James Ashby,
one journalist in the Sydney Morning Herald argued ‘she [Gillard] showed
she was prepared to defend even the denigration of women if it would help
her keep power’ (Hartcher 2012; see also Albrechtsen 2013). These jour-
nalists, however, expressed no concerns about the similar ‘denigration’
(also via heavily sexualised insults) of Gillard herself (Trimble 2016; see
also Summers 2013). Another journalist accused Gillard of ‘betraying’
feminism through her political support of Slipper (Grattan 2012). Such
readings, of course, worked to help undermine and call into question the
legitimacy of Gillard’s impassioned critique of sexism and misogyny, a
gesture that potentially ‘damages these arguments for future use’ (Don-
aghue 2015, p. 172; see also Trimble 2016, 2017).19
In the dominant interpretive frames used by journalists, rather than
Abbott’s misogyny being figured as an issue, ‘speaking about sexism,
failing to ignore it, failing to rise above it – this is the behaviour that is
constructed as abnormal and problematic’ (Worth et al. 2016, p. 61, ori-
ginal emphasis). This is a failure to adhere to the pervasive national (and
postfeminist) narrative that gender, along with other modalities of
Political journalism 205
ifference, is inconsequential. Conservative commentator Miranda Devine
d
(2012) made this explicit in her column after the speech: ‘Playing the
gender card is the pathetic last refuge of incompetents … It offends the
Australian notion of the fair go.’ In this respect, Gillard’s speech contested
the notion that Australia, like others in the West, is a country with little
need for feminism or organised feminist activism; responses to the speech
(such as Devine’s) reveal a deep investment in this narrative. That is, it was
seen as incongruous in a context where gender is (wrongly) thought to
barely register. As Varney argues, the speech served to ‘expose the hollow-
ness’ of these ‘mythical Australian values’ (2017, p. 28; see also Trimble
2016), such as egalitarianism, myths Gillard herself had previously worked
hard to reinscribe (Hall & Donaghue 2013). Gillard, therefore, embodied
a threat to dominant ways of framing the Australian nation, and accord-
ingly had to be rebuked. It was Gillard’s contestation of sexism, not the
sexism itself, that was seen as an act of ‘extreme political violence’
(Trimble 2016, p. 297).
Gillard’s speech was also framed as a sign of weakness: ‘I never heard
Thatcher scream out in the House of Commons that her critics were sexist
misogynists. She would have thought that sounded weak’ (Advertiser, 15
October 2012). One article cited Julie Bishop, who suggested that Austral-
ian women had high expectations of Gillard as the first female prime
minister, and that – by claiming she was a victim of sexism – she had
effectively ‘let [them] down’ (in Wright 2012). Similarly, Janet Albrechtsen
(2013) wrote in the Australian, ‘the gender-card-waving PM rates poorly
as a feminist role model’ because, she implies, she didn’t exhibit neoliberal-
ism’s and postfeminism’s, ‘compulsory individualism’ (Cronin 2000); that
is, she failed to do-it-herself. The ‘gender card’ metaphor, and its assump-
tion that women politicians bring attention to their gender as a tactical
choice, ‘suggests that the voters might not notice that the candidate is a
woman unless she proactively calls attention to the fact’ (Falk 2013,
p. 198). That is, in this purportedly postfeminist political environment,
gender plays no part in politics or its reporting unless women choose for it
to be a factor; this, as we have shown, is patently not the case. Assertions
of politicians ‘playing the gender card’, therefore, are rooted in postfemi-
nist assumptions about gender’s contemporary irrelevance and presume
that it is only ever strategically deployed for political purposes. Finally, it
is significant that in subsequent media interviews, perhaps in response to
this negative press coverage, Gillard worked to downplay these gendered
attacks, acknowledging sexism but ‘simultaneously restricting it to a small,
extremist minority’ (Sorrentino et al. 2019, pp. 13–14); rather than being
at the heart of the Australian nation, sexism and misogyny were refigured
as an aberration. Although she has publicly rewritten this narrative
(Gillard 2014) since herself being deposed by Rudd in 2013, after the
speech, and for the remainder of her tenure, her belated feminist voice was
largely silenced, and the postfeminist order was thereby restored.20
206 Political journalism
Julie Bishop: Australian politics’ (and postfeminism’s)
glamour girl
In this concluding section, we focus on a high-profile leader at the conser-
vative end of the Australian political spectrum, the Liberal Party’s Julie
Bishop. She was first elected to the Australian Parliament in 1998, as the
member for the West Australian electorate of Curtin, and she has served
as a Minister in the Howard, Abbott, and Turnbull governments. Until
recently, she was the Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs – the first
woman to be appointed to this highly significant international role – and
Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party from 2007. As Foreign Minister, and
like Hillary Clinton as US Secretary of State, Bishop took on a role
usually reserved for men; Bishop herself, though, worked to feminise this
role: ‘I see myself as Australia’s relationship manager’, she told a journal-
ist (Sams 2014).
Overall, while Bishop refuses to acknowledge her gender, and especially
how it may have hindered her (or other women) in the Australian political
sphere, she consistently performs an overt celebration of femininity. She
embodies what has been described as the ‘Iron Butterfly’ model of conser-
vative femininity, which is
non-disruptive of the gendered social order and does not openly chal-
lenge the masculinist status quo hierarchy. It is a model that sees
women succeeding within the current system ‘on merit’ and refuses to
advocate for structural reform to rebalance male privilege.
(Lee-Koo & Maley 2017, p. 320)
Bishop reassures readers (and, more importantly, voters) that she can be an
independent, empowered political actor while simultaneously embodying a
femininity that is not disruptive to the patriarchal status quo; this is, we
would suggest, a conventional form of postfeminism-in-action.
While such defences from Bishop are common, it is a very specific kind
of glamorised femininity that she seeks to defend – one that is based on
various forms of capital (economic, symbolic, cultural, corporeal) for its
successful enactment. Bishop’s repeated claims about femininity are entirely
consistent with those of feminist critics who take issue with the positioning
of feminine cultures and consumption practices as devalued, trivialised and
frivolous (Heywood & Drake 1997; Hollows 2000; Baumgardner & Rich-
ards, 2002; Scott 2006). While, critically, the relationship between these
two loaded signifiers has been exposed to be especially fraught, Bishop rhe-
torically appears to combine third wave feminism with postfeminism,
adopting the celebration of consumption, fashion, femininity and their
pleasures as per the former, while presuming that women, like herself, are
now unimpeded agents in the public sphere, as per the latter.21 Within such
a representational economy, ‘Fashion is a signifier of the postfeminist and
essentialized norm: women love to shop and to covet designer labels’
(Winch 2013, p. 124). But, in Bishop’s case, they also ‘love to’ broker
foreign trade deals, sanction dictatorships, and administer international aid
programmes. It is such reconcilability that both she and journalists under-
score; one title sums it up: ‘Julie Bishop: a leader of style and substance’
(Sams 2014). In this way, she is the ideal addressee of one of our women’s
magazines, Marie Claire, whose slogan consists of these two signifiers.
Within postfeminist culture, as our previous chapters have underscored,
‘beauty, fashion and adornment remain highly prized as part of the arsenal
of the high-achieving woman, so that postfeminism equates with excessive
consumption, while at the same time expressing sentiments of empower-
ment and female capability’ (Whelehan 2010, p. 156). In alignment with
such logic, and while ‘excessive attention to fashion trends can suggest a
frivolous attitude that may tarnish the image of a politician’ (Campus
2013, p. 83), in media coverage of Bishop it is used as evidence of an
agentic, self-assured femininity that remains uncompromised by her parti-
cipation in the ‘masculine’ world of politics. While Mary Douglas Vavrus
(2002, p. 2) argues that postfeminism ‘encourages women’s private, con-
sumer lifestyles rather than cultivating a desire for public life and political
208 Political journalism
activism’, this (self)representation of Bishop dismisses any tension between
them. These journalists appear to accept Bishop’s formulation – that is, her
refusal to position femininity and politics antithetically – but this reporting
is not without its limitations. For example, one article notes, ‘We look
back on some of Bishop’s best outfits, proving you can dress like a fem-
inine fashionista while being a total boss at the same time’ (Quaggin
2016). The remainder of the piece consists, not of policy achievements, but
of photographs of Bishop in some of her more noteworthy designer
dresses. Such stories are reserved for women politicians, and further evid-
ence that ‘clothing is a clear indicator of media confusion about how to
cover women in public life’ (Campus 2013, p. 87). Moreover, such ‘red
carpet’ stories indicate the extent to which the political sphere has become
thoroughly entangled with celebrity culture – especially for women.
Dubbing her the ‘Minister of Fashion’ (Salemme 2014), one newspaper
article also underscores her consumption of luxury items: ‘Like her expen-
sive taste in clothing, Ms Bishop favours Giorgio Armani and Chanel cos-
metics’ (see also Konstantinides 2017). Reminiscent of Sex and the City’s
resident shoe fetishist Carrie Bradshaw, she also confesses: ‘Yes, I’m a shoe
lover, I admit. Absolutely, absolutely. Give a girl the right shoes and she
can take on the world … Shoes are part of your self-expression, they can
give you confidence. I think they’re so important’ (in Salemme 2014). Rep-
resenting as it does a yoking of a celebratory attitude towards consump-
tion with a feminist-informed vision of women as high-level actors on the
global stage, such self-positioning appears consistent with the kind of neo-
liberal postfeminism mapped by critics in other contexts (McRobbie 2015;
Banet-Weiser 2018; Rottenberg 2018). Bishop is the idealised subject
brought into being in the women’s magazines we examined in Chapter 3,
and who young Australian women can aspire to become. Additionally,
though postfeminist culture has long been known for its celebration of a
youthful, idealised feminine subject (Wearing 2007; Negra 2009; Jermyn
& Holmes 2015; Whelehan & Gywnne 2015), Deborah Jermyn notes that
recently there has been a pronounced discursive shift, where ‘older women
seem increasingly positioned as credible fashion consumers and arbiters’
(2016, p. 575). These local representations of Bishop are consistent with
this apparent shift.
As mentioned earlier, it is not just femininity that is key to these repre-
sentations of Bishop as a desirable figure but also class. In terms of class
dynamics, these representations shore up not just her political legitimacy in
a wider sense, as Katrina Lee-Koo and Maria Maley argue (2017, p. 327),
but her status as a legitimate representative of her party. The Australian
Liberal Party, like the Conservatives in the United Kingdom or the Repub-
licans in the United States, promotes a free market logic and critique of
over-regulation and taxation, but also has broadened its voter base to the
‘aspirational’ voters who equate support for the party – at least at the
ballot box – with the trajectory of upward class mobility. Such celebration
Political journalism 209
and normalisation of a desire for upward mobility are written into the
enduring national myth of egalitarianism (Elder 2007, p. 58), as well as
neoliberalism, both of which presume that gender does not inhibit Austral-
ian women, that all Australians are entitled to a ‘fair go’ (a fiction that
continues to do deeply ideological work, in both progressive terms as
Chapter 1 shows, and more retrograde forms, as we see here).
Bishop suggests that all Australian women can access the privileges gar-
nered by second wave feminism – education, professionalisation, inde-
pendence, success, wealth – without destabilising normative femininity in
any significant respect; again, classic postfeminism. In addition, her
interest in expensive, luxury designer items positions her as part of an
upper-class elite, and, like chick lit, offers an aspirational narrative for
post-second wave Australian women and girls, thereby shifting the focus
from the masculine working-class Aussie ‘battler’ (with whom Hanson was
preoccupied) to the young woman on the move, literally through her posi-
tioning on the global stage, and symbolically in class terms. One journalist
framed this concerted embrace of femininity as one of the key differences
between Bishop and her Labor party counterparts, who – indicative of
class-based distinctions – reportedly ‘view her Armani suits, trademark
polish, mannered debating style and mildly flirtatious manner with suspi-
cion’ (Snow 2013). Moreover, as myriad media profiles foregrounding her
designer wardrobe underscore – itself also consistent with ‘postfeminist
consumerist enchantment’ (Negra 2009, p. 118) – Bishop clearly displays
‘signifiers of wealth … that speak to the kind of class privilege that enables
“successful ageing” ’ (Jermyn 2016, p. 579). Thus, while some women are
permitted visibility as ageing bodies, this cannot be easily detached from
class dynamics. Bishop’s very public ageing, as well as her status as
‘unwife’ (Kingston 2004) and ‘unmother’, is permissible because of her
class location and the ways in which it is, quite literally, written on her
designer-clad body. We conclude with our final flashpoint: Bishop’s
October 2014 speech to the National Press Club.
I’m not saying I’m not a feminist, I don’t reject the term, I’m just
saying it’s not a way I describe myself. First and foremost I’m a
parliamentarian, a minister. I don’t find the need to self-describe in
that way.
(In Medhora 2014)
Such a critique of her male colleagues’ behaviour, and the symbolic silenc-
ing of women parliamentarians, is clearly a feminist one. Perhaps this shift
and willingness to publicly discuss the gendered behaviours that have
marred the Cabinet process, and politics more broadly, is the product of
an increased cultural visibility of (a certain form of) feminism over the past
few years (Gill 2016; Taylor 2016). In this press coverage, and in stark
contrast to Gillard in 2012, she becomes repositioned as a valiant feminist
warrior, cited on the differences in men’s and women’s leadership styles;
(re)branding herself this way has a new kind of cultural currency (Hamad &
Taylor 2015). For some, though, it was seen to be a strategic political
gesture to differentiate herself from the more conservative branch of the
Liberal Party, which includes former Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s sup-
porters, to help support leadership ambitions (Bolt 2017a). As with Gil-
lard’s misogyny speech, the articulation of feminist sentiments comes to be
publicly dismissed as a strategic political gesture.
As we were finalising this chapter, Bishop was a casualty in a leadership
coup that saw Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull replaced by the ‘family
values’ focused, Evangelical Christian Scott Morrison. After unsuccessfully
putting herself forward in a leadership ballot, she announced on 28 August
2018 that she would not be seeking a position in Morrison’s cabinet, and
media coverage focused extensively on her appearance: Bishop fronted a
press conference in the courtyard of Parliament House wearing (remin-
iscent of Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz) a pair of sparkly red high heels,
with matching painted fingernails. As in previous coverage of Bishop,
212 Political journalism
which saw empowerment and femininity as entirely reconcilable, women
journalists praised her ‘awesome power heels’, with this sartorial gesture
being figured as one of (feminist) resistance and defiance (Sullivan 2018).23
Some journalists queried whether Bishop would now pronounce an affili-
ation with feminism, given that gender was clearly a factor in her failure to
win the leadership ballot (Baird 2018). Shortly after her resignation,
Bishop spoke at another Australian Women’s Weekly event (‘Women of
the Future’) and called into question the Liberal Party’s poor record on
women’s representation: ‘It is not acceptable for us in 2018 to have less
than 25 per cent of our parliamentarians as female’ (in Truman 2018). As
yet she has not explicitly revised her public stance in relation to feminism,
but now that she is no longer a high-level government minister, her posi-
tion, and the kind of public persona she constructs, may indeed shift (as
Gillard’s has since leaving politics).
Conclusion
As we have made clear, when it comes to women and institutional power
and how it is publicly conceptualised, there is a much less optimistic story
to tell about Australian postfeminist culture than in our other chapters;
women are permitted access to power, but only within very real material
and discursive limits. In this way, in our semioscape of constrained power,
we see some similarities between Australian political leaders and those
elsewhere, such as Hillary Clinton whose appalling media treatment has
been well documented and critiqued (Bordo 2017). We concur with
Sheeler and Anderson that ‘even as legal barriers to women’s participation
in electoral politics have been dismantled, their cultural, discursive, and
rhetorical constituents remain’ (2013, p. 3). Regardless of feminism’s
increased visibility over the past few years, the more recent examples here
(Gillard and Bishop) suggest not that troublesome gendered news report-
ing has become less prevalent since Hanson’s appearance on the political
stage in 1996 but that it has become more pronounced. That is, despite the
post-gender rhetoric, political representation has still not managed to shift
its codes of representation.
This chapter, like previous ones, has made clear that Australian news
coverage at once draws upon and complicates a number of key tropes and
discourses mobilised elsewhere in relation to neoliberal postfeminism. We
have shown that these three political figures, Pauline Hanson, Julia
Gillard, and Julie Bishop, each have had an ambivalent relation to fem-
inism, and indeed to femininity, and it is in such a space that we can see
the intersections of postfeminism and gendered discourses around
women’s leadership. While myriad studies have demonstrated how women
politicians are discursively constituted in ways which serve to undermine
or call into question their ability to lead or occupy key sites of political
power, we have located our analysis of Hanson, Gillard, and Bishop in
Political journalism 213
Australia’s specific political and cultural histories. Following Holland and
Wright’s (2017) recent work, we have conjectured that each of these
women, to varying degrees, faced a unique form of ‘double delegitimisa-
tion’, based on their status as both women politicians and political leaders
in a context founded on ‘exclusive and exclusionary male narratives[s] of
the national identity’ (p. 593). Enduring Australian nationalist mythologies
can be seen to inform these gendered discursive constructions in particular
ways. Further to this, we have shown that despite post-class assumptions,
class significantly inflected the way these women have been figured in
public discourse. In this respect, we have attempted to foreground how
postfeminism, nationalism, classism, ageing, and heterosexism ‘work
together to reproduce social inequality and relations of power’ (Butler
2014, pp. 53–54).
In terms of our findings, this chapter is the most atypical, suggesting
much about the need for further institutional and cultural shifts, both in
terms of Australian parliamentary politics itself and in terms of how
women’s relation to power is discursively constructed (including by
women themselves). The previous chapters show that cultural forms pro-
duced by and for women outstrip the capacity of ‘the real’ to actually
engage with a changed gender regime. The news coverage we have exam-
ined also reveals a deeply conflicted position regarding feminism: these
female politicians were damned if they declared they were feminists, and
damned if they did not. Indeed, feminism itself has become another way of
disciplining women politicians. Further, the flashpoints analysed here
mobilise a number of familiar postfeminist tropes, especially around sex-
ism’s, and thus feminism’s, ‘pastness’, and such narratives themselves come
to be disrupted, including by the political women at their centre (Gillard’s
misogyny speech and Bishop’s critique of the patently masculinist culture
of parliamentary politics, for instance).
In Australia, as elsewhere, there is now a greater public awareness of
gender politics, and in 2018 the question of women’s political representa-
tion is the subject of almost daily news coverage. These case studies have
demonstrated the limited discursive frames being mobilised to report on
women in power, suggesting – not simply that political institutions need to
be further transformed – but that the language for publicly making sense
of such powerful women also needs to be fundamentally overhauled, espe-
cially as such representations potentially have very real effects (such as
whether women will pursue a career in politics at all).24 It is in this space,
we argue, that the unfinished business of Australian feminism comes most
clearly into focus. Contra egalitarianism – itself a discourse, consistent
with postfeminism, used to suggest feminism’s redundancy – women as
political actors are far from being given a ‘fair go’. In the book’s conclu-
sion, drawing together our insights from each case study, we offer some
suppositions as to why postfeminism appears to be playing out in some
markedly different ways in Australia.
214 Political journalism
Notes
1 As many critics have argued, women in politics are subject to a ‘double bind’
(Jamieson 1995), where they must negotiate the expectation that they remain
stereotypically feminine while consistently proving that they (in spite of this)
are capable of successfully acting in the masculinist world of politics.
2 The problematic way women politicians have been represented in the
Australian media has been taken up extensively by a number of critics (Baird
2004; Muir 2005; Taylor 2015), as it has in other contexts (Norris 1997;
Vavrus 2002; Van Zoonen 2006; Campus 2013), especially given the focus on
their appearance and intimate bonds.
3 It is worth mentioning that Australia’s news landscape is undoubtedly shaped
by the concentration of media ownership, with two companies controlling the
overwhelming majority of newspapers: News Limited (including national
broadsheet, the Australian, the Daily Telegraph, the Herald Sun and the
Courier Mail) and Fairfax (including the Age, the Sydney Morning Herald, the
Financial Review, the Sun Herald and the Canberra Times). Given such con-
centration, there is a degree of consistency and homogeneity in terms of how
Australian women politicians are reported, especially depending upon their
political affiliation (e.g. as we shall see, News Limited coverage of Gillard was
overwhelmingly negative).
4 Howard (‘PM Calls for End to History Wars’, 2009) explains this: ‘The black
armband view of our past reflects a belief that most Australian history since
1788 has been little more than a disgraceful story of imperialism, exploitation,
racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination’.
5 Hanson was convicted of electoral fraud in 2003, but served only 78 days of
her sentence (Mackenzie 2003). She maintained her celebrity status, appearing
on Dancing with the Stars in mid-2004 and Who Wants to Be a Millionaire in
2005, and the Australian adaptation of Donald Trump’s The Celebrity
Apprentice in 2011.
6 See Kingston’s 2001 book for the collapse of Hanson’s relationship with One
Nation power brokers. More recently, these include James Ashby, who – as we
discuss in the Gillard section – had been a staffer to the Speaker of the House,
Peter Slipper.
7 One of Australia’s more prominent celebrity feminists, Anne Summers, prob-
lematically wrote:
Hanson’s frock said it all. The zebra stripes implying wildness and unpre-
dictability combined with the sexual allure of the tropical hibiscus epito-
mised Pauline’s political potency. The packaging, too, was pretty much
perfect. The neckline plunged, but not too far. The skirt was decorously
long, but frivolous with its spiralling ruffles. She was unencumbered by a
Thatcherite handbag, the sandals matched and let’s face it she has the body
to wear such an outfit.
(2001)
8 Similarly, as Melissa Gregg remarks, in the case of Gillard ‘it was female jour-
nalists who were primarily raising questions regarding Gillard’s appearance,
clothing, and accent’ (2011, p. 73). For an analysis of how Hanson was
handled by Sixty Minutes journalist Tracey Curro, during the infamous ‘please
explain interview’ (when Hanson asked what ‘xenophobic’ meant), see
Meaghan Morris’s 2000 article.
9 In the Herald Sun adaptation of this story, McCabe (1998b) quotes one of the
Who Weekly judges of the worst dressed celebrities (Hanson came in at
number two) without editorialising: ‘This is someone who has absolutely no
Political journalism 215
idea how to dress for her figure, her coloring, or her age’. Hanson, this comment
implies, as a woman, lacks appropriate cultural competencies (something for
which we later see Bishop celebrated).
10 Of course, this persistent reference to her by first name (as with Gillard) can be
seen as part of a wider culture of disrespect towards women political leaders in
Australia (Summers 2013, p. 111).
11 Some scholars have attempted to recuperate Hanson as a feminist figure, arguing
that her life choices and her active engagement in the political sphere work to
position her as such even if she does not explicitly identify as feminist (Ellison &
Deutchman 1999; Deutchman & Ellison 2004).
12 As a profile in the Age observes, ‘Twice-divorced Hanson is not a “family
values” conservative’ (Alcorn 1998).
13 Kennedy (2014) refers to Gillard this way in her review of My Story.
14 Trimble’s comprehensive study, however, underscores how journalists deprived
Gillard (like Hanson) of agency, positioning her as the subordinate ‘puppet’ of
the ALP’s ‘faceless men’ (2017, p. 57).
15 For example, Labor State Premiers Carmen Lawrence (Western Australia) and
Joan Kirner (Victoria) were widely denigrated in press coverage (Baird 2004).
16 Many feminist commentators have remarked upon differences between the
international and the local reception of Gillard’s speech (Summers 2013;
Stevenson 2013; Goldsworthy 2014; Wright & Holland 2014; Donaghue 2015).
17 Pilger suggests:
Promoted by glass-ceiling feminists with scant interest in the actual politics
and actions of their hero, Gillard is the embodiment of the Australian Labor
party machine – a number-crunching machine long bereft of principle that has
attacked and betrayed Australia’s most vulnerable people, especially women.
(2012)
18 Well-known Australian feminist academic and founder of the Australian
Women’s Electoral Lobby, Eva Cox (2013), also took issue with Gillard’s fail-
ures in terms of policies benefiting women.
19 That said, it also helped to bring into being various forms of feminist counter
publics, especially online, and thereby is central to a form of feminist visibility
which is ongoing in Australia (as elsewhere). For example, the ‘Destroy the
Joint’ Facebook group was formed in response to radio shock-jock Alan
Jones’s offensive comments about Gillard and continues to make a range of
feminist issues visible via this platform (see McLean & Maalsen 2017).
20 In her final press conference as PM, she revisited the question of gender, noting
rather non-committally: ‘It doesn’t explain everything, it doesn’t explain nothing,
it explains some things’ (Gillard 2013; see Sorrentino et al. 2019).
21 While some critics, such as Munford and Gillis (2004), work to underscore the
similarities between the two, others such as Shelley Budgeon (2013) emphasise
their points of divergence.
22 Her attitude to misogyny was seen to significantly differentiate her from Gillard; as
Callick (2013) remarked, ‘if anyone expects Bishop to take up where former PM
Julia Gillard left off, railing against sexism and misogyny, they will be disappointed’.
23 On 30 November 2018, Bishop donated these shoes to the Museum of
Australian Democracy, dubbing them a symbol of women’s empowerment.
24 For an analysis on how media coverage impacts young women’s engagement
with politics, see Lonie (2019).
216 Political journalism
References
Akerman, P. 2006, ‘Feminism dead: PM – praise for younger mothers’, Sunday
Telegraph, 31 December, viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Albrechtsen, J. 2013, ‘PM’s fake feminism is man made’, Australian, 9 October,
viewed 5 May 2019, Factiva.
Alcorn, G. 1998, ‘In pursuit of Pauline’, Age, 26 September, viewed 5 May 2019,
Factiva.
Alderson, M. 2001, ‘Frock shock: it’s Pauline’s party and she’ll wear what she
wants to’, Sydney Morning Herald, 15 February, viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Appleby, P. 2015, ‘Julia Gillard: a murderous rage’, in J. Wilson & D. Boxer (eds),
Discourse, politics and women as a political leaders, John Benjamins Publishing
Company, Amsterdam, pp. 149–168.
Ashby, J. 2005, ‘Postfeminism in the British frame’, Cinema Journal, vol. 44, no. 2,
pp. 127–132.
Bail, K. (ed.) 1996, DIY Feminism, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.
Baird, J. 2004, Media tarts: how the Australian press frames female politicians,
Scribe, Melbourne.
Baird, J 2018 ‘Julie Bishop was no “Lady Macbeth” ’, Sydney Morning Herald,
24 August, viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Baker, J. 2016, ‘Julie Bishop: “Why should I apologise for being feminine?” ’,
Daily Telegraph, 16 October, viewed 4 May 2019 www.dailytelegraph.com.au/
lifestyle/stellar/julie-bishop-i-dont-let-other-people-define-me/news-story/60b275
160d34b91017c7ae6ea9f886aa.
Banet-Weiser, S. 2018, Empowered: popular feminism and popular misogyny,
Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Barnett, E. 2012, ‘Julia Gillard’s blistering attack on sexism was her best card’,
Telegraph, 10 October, viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Bartlett, A. 1998, ‘Is Pauline Hanson the media’s fault?’, Australian, 5 June,
viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Baumgardner, J. & Richards, A. 2002, Manifesta: young women, feminism and the
future, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Bolt, A. 2017a, ‘Turnbull in a skirt won’t save Libs’, Herald Sun, 6 March, viewed
4 May 2019, www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/turnbull-in-skirts-wont-
save-libs/news-story/4d922c1aefc1eee2e2434e2eaedd5f33.
Bolt, A. 2017b, ‘Worrying response to Hanson’s burqa stunt’, Herald Sun,
17 August.
Bordo, S. 2017, The Destruction of Hillary Clinton, Melville House, Brooklyn, NY.
Brett, J. 2005, ‘Relaxed and comfortable: the Liberal Party’s Australia’, Quarterly
Essay, no. 19, Black Inc., Melbourne.
Broinowski, A. 2017, Please explain: the rise, fall, and rise again of Pauline
Hanson, Penguin, Melbourne.
Brookes, S. 2017, Politics, media and campaign language: Australia’s identity
anxiety, Anthem Press, London.
Budgeon, S. 2013, Third wave feminism and the politics of gender in late modernity,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Butler, J. 1990, Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity, Routledge,
New York.
Butler, J. 2004, Undoing gender, Routledge, New York.
Political journalism 217
Butler, J. 2014, ‘For white girls only? Postfeminism and the politics of inclusion’,
Feminist Formations, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–58.
Callick, R. 2013, ‘Julie Bishop: all the right moves’, Weekend Australian, 28 Sep-
tember, viewed 4 May 2019, www.theaustralian.com.au/life/weekend-austral-
ian-magazine/julie-bishop-all-the-right-moves/news-story/edefa5778eda390aca
717a24acd8226e.
Campbell, J. 2012, ‘Women should avoid this column on the Julia Gillard sexism
debate’ Herald Sun, 13 October.
Campus, D. 2013, Women politicians and the media, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Chapple, K. 2014, ‘Gillard’s “misogyny speech” and the perceived play of the
“gender card” ’, Ethics Quarterly, vol. 96, pp. 6–8.
Cox, E. 2013, ‘Gender not a party tool’, Australian, 13 June, viewed 4 May 2019,
Factiva.
Credlin, P. 2017, ‘It’s time we grew up and banned the burqa’, Daily Telegraph,
27 August, viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Cronin, A. 2000, ‘Consumerism and “compulsory individuality”: women, will and
potential’, in S. Ahmed, J. Kilby, C. Lury, M. McNeil, & B. Skeggs (eds), Trans-
formations: thinking through feminism, Routledge, London, pp. 273–287.
Curthoys, A. & Johnson, C. 1998, ‘Articulating the future and the past: gender,
race, and globalisation in One Nation’, Hecate, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 97–114.
Deutchman, I. & Ellison, A. 2004, ‘When feminists don’t fit: the case of Pauline
Hanson’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–52.
Devine, M. 2012, ‘Gender card is a loser for Gillard’, Daily Telegraph,
14 October, viewed 4 May 2019, www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/
miranda-devine-gender-card-is-a-loser/news-story/19de329b255ff5739321d605b
1fa24cf.
Donaghue, N. 2015, ‘Who gets played by the gender card?’, Australian Feminist
Studies, vol. 30, no. 84, pp. 161–178.
Dow, B. 1996, Prime time feminism: television, media culture, and the women’s
movement since 1970, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Dubriwny, T.N. 2012, The vulnerable empowered woman: feminism, postfemi-
nism, and women’s health, Rutgers University Press, New York.
Duruz, J. & Johnson, C. 2002, ‘Mourning at a distance: Australians and the death
of a British princess’, in A. Kear & D.L. Steinberg (eds), Mourning Diana:
nation, culture and the performance of grief, Routledge, London, pp. 142–154.
Dyrenfurth, N. 2007, ‘John Howard’s hegemony of values: the politics of “mateship”
in the Howard decade’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 42, no. 2,
pp. 211–230.
Elder, C. 2007, Being Australian: narratives of national identity, Allen & Unwin,
Crows Nest.
Elliott, H. 1998, ‘Hanson’s sexual power’, Herald Sun, 10 June, viewed 4 May
2019, Factiva.
Ellison, A. & Deutchman, I. 1999, ‘A star is born: the roller coaster ride of Pauline
Hanson in the news’, Media, Culture, Society, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 33–50.
Elton-Pym, J. 2017, ‘ “I feel for these women”: Pauline Hanson defends burqa
stunt, says she wasn’t ID checked before entering Senate’, SBS News, 18 August,
viewed 4 May 2019, www.sbs.com.au/news/i-feel-for-these-women-pauline-han
son-defends-burqa-stunt-says-she-wasn-t-id-checked-before-entering-senate.
218 Political journalism
Este, J. 1998, ‘Melba news’, Australian, 24 June, viewed 5 May, Factiva.
Falk, E. 2013, ‘Clinton and the playing-the-gender-card metaphor in campaign
news’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 13 no. 2, pp. 192–207.
Franklin, M. 2001a, ‘Hanson hype is back to 1998’, Courier Mail, 14 February,
viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Franklin, M. 2001b, ‘Pauline explained’, Courier Mail, 17 February, viewed 4 May
2019, Factiva.
Fraser, N. 2013, Fortunes of feminism: from state-managed capitalism to neolib-
eral crisis, Verso Books, London.
Frenkel, D. 2011, ‘Drop the Gillard twang: it’s beginning to annoy’, Age, 21 April,
viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Gare, S. 1998 ‘Arise, Pauline, princess of wails’, Australian, 20 June, viewed
4 May 2019, Factiva.
Genz, S. 2009, Postfemininities in popular culture, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Gill, R. 2007, ‘Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility’, European
Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–166.
Gill, R. 2011, ‘Sexism reloaded, or, it’s time to get angry again!’, Feminist Media
Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 61–71.
Gill, R. 2016, ‘Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times’,
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 610–630.
Gillard, J. 2012, ‘Transcript of Julia Gillard’s Speech’, Sydney Morning Herald,
10 October, viewed 25 April 2019, www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-
news/transcript-of-julia-gillards-speech-20121009-27c36.html.
Gillard, J. 2013, ‘Julia Gillard tells of “privilege” of being first female PM’, ABC
news, 26 June, viewed 4 May 2019, www.abc.net.au/news/specials/rudd-returns
/2013-06-26/julia-gillard-speaks-about-defeat/4783950.
Gillard, J. 2014, My Story, Knopf, North Sydney.
Goldsworthy, A. 2014, Unfinished business: sex, freedom and misogyny, Quarterly
Essay 50, Black Inc., Collingwood.
Grattan, M. 2010, ‘Finessing a flagrant backflip’, Age, 26 June, viewed 25 April
2019, Factiva.
Grattan, M. 2012, ‘Misogyny war has no winner’, Age, 12 October, accessed via:
www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/misogyny-war-has-no-winner-20121011-
27fm3.html.
Gregg, M. 2011, ‘Do your homework: new media, old problems’, Feminist Media
Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 73–81.
Hage, G. 2000, ‘ “Asia”, Hansonism and the discourse of white decline’, Inter-Asia
Cultural Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 85–96.
Hall, L.J. & Donaghue, N. 2013, ‘ “Nice girls don’t carry knives”: constructions of
ambition in media coverage of Australia’s first female prime minister’, The
British Psychological Society, vol. 52, pp. 631–647.
Hamad, H. & Taylor, A. 2015, ‘Introduction: feminism and contemporary celeb-
rity culture’, Celebrity Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 124–127.
Hanson, P. 1996, ‘Pauline Hanson’s 1996 maiden speech to parliament: full tran-
script’, Sydney Morning Herald, 15 September, viewed 25 April 2019, www.
smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/pauline-hansons-1996-maiden-
speech-to-parliament-full-transcript-20160914-grgjv3.html.
Hartcher, P. 2012, ‘We expected more of Gillard’, Sydney Morning Herald,
10 October, viewed 25 April 2019, Factiva.
Political journalism 219
Heywood, L. & Drake, J. (eds) 1997, Third wave agenda: doing feminism, being
feminist, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Hickman, B. 1998, ‘The Sum of the Parts that make Pauline – Sex appeal’,
Australian, 20 June, viewed 5 May, Factiva.
Ho, C. 2010, ‘Responding to orientalist feminism: women’s rights and the War on
Terror’, Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 25, no. 66, pp. 433–439.
Holland, J. & Wright, K.M. 2017, ‘The double delegitimatisation of Julia Gillard:
gender, the media, and Australian political culture’, Australian Journal of Pol-
itics and History, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 588–602.
Hollows, J. 2000, Feminism, femininity and popular culture, University of
Manchester Press, Manchester.
Hough, A. 2016, ‘The gender composition of the 45th parliament’, Parliament of
Australia website, viewed 25 April 2019, www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/
Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/FlagPost/2016/August/The_
gender_composition_of_the_45th_parliament.
Hussein, S. 2016, From victims to suspects: Muslim women since 9/11, New South
Books, Sydney.
Ireland, J. 2014, ‘ “I’m no feminist”: Julie Bishop’, Sydney Morning Herald, 29
October, viewed 25 April 2019, www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/im-no-
feminist-julie-bishop-20141029-11dn7m.html.
Ireland J. 2017, ‘ “It was pretty lonely”: Julie Bishop on being the only woman in
cabinet’, Sydney Morning Herald, 5 October, viewed 26 April 2019, www.smh.
com.au/politics/federal/it-was-pretty-lonely-julie-bishop-on-being-the-only-
woman-in-cabinet-20171005-gyuwxc.html.
Jamieson, K.H. 1995, Beyond the double bind: women and leadership, Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
Jermyn, D. 2016, ‘Pretty past it? Interrogating the post-feminist makeover of
ageing, style, and fashion’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 573–589.
Jermyn, D. & Holmes, S. (eds) 2015, Women, celebrity and cultures of ageing:
freeze frame, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Johnson, C. 2007, ‘John Howard’s “values” and Australian identity’, Australian
Journal of Political Science, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 195–209.
Johnson, C. 2015, ‘Playing the gender card: the uses and abuses of gender in
Australian politics’, Politics and Gender, vol. 15, pp. 291–315.
Jones, A.L. 2014, The gender vendors: sex and lies from Abraham to Freud,
Lexington, New York.
Karp, P. 2017, ‘Women will get pregnant for paid leave, Pauline Hanson says in
opposing omnibus bill’, Guardian, 23 February, viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Karvelas, P. 2010, ‘A pragmatist’s rise to the top’, Australian, 25 June, viewed
25 April 2019, Factiva.
Kennedy, C. 2014, ‘Politics and gender in modern Australia’, Survival: Global Pol-
itics and Strategy, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 189–196.
Kingston, A. 2004, The meaning of wife, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York.
Kingston, M. 1998, ‘Little redhead sets the WA faithful alight’, Sydney Morning
Herald, 15 September, viewed 4 May 2019, Factiva.
Kingston, M. 2001, Off the rails: the Pauline Hanson trip, 2nd edn. Allen &
Unwin, St Leonards.
Konstantinides, A. 2017, ‘Inside “fashion minister” Julie Bishop’s VERY extrava-
gant wardrobe: Armani suits, a $32,000 Rachel Gilbert gown and $1,500
220 Political journalism
Christian Louboutin heels’, Daily Mail, 9 November, viewed 4 May 2019,
Factiva.
Kurti, P. 2017, ‘Pauline Hanson’s cheap stunt was insulting and wrong’, Daily
Telegraph, 18 August, viewed 4 May 2019, www.dailytelegraph.com.au/rendez-
view/pauline-hansons-cheap-stunt-was-insulting-and-wrong/news-story/
b6b6d9191bb0b11bff5e2a6523290132.
Lake, M. 2013, ‘How the PM’s gender took over the agenda’, Age, 25 June,
viewed 25 April 2019, Factiva.
Lee-Koo, K. & Maley, M. 2017, ‘The iron butterfly and the political warrior:
mobilising models of femininity in the Australian Liberal Party’, Australian
Journal of Political Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 317–334.
Leser, D. 1996, ‘Pauline Hanson’s Bitter Harvest’, Good Weekend Magazine,
30 November, pp. 1–23.
Lester, A. 2012, ‘Ladylike: Julia Gillard’s misogyny speech’, The New Yorker,
9 October, viewed 4 May 2019, www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/ladylike-
julia-gillards-misogyny-speech.
Lonie, K. 2019, Hillary, Hashtags and Hermione: Young women’s political
engagement, celebrity and the new media landscape, unpublished doctoral thesis,
Department of Gender and Cultural Studies, University of Sydney.
Ludlow, M. 2016, ‘Election 2016: Pauline Hanson’s return like 1996 all over
again’, Financial Review, 6 July, viewed 4 May 2019, www.afr.com/news/politics/
election-2016-pauline-hansons-return-like-1996-all-over-again-20160706-gpzkdl.
Lumby, C. 1998, ‘Hanson the anti-media media star’, Age, 17 July, viewed 5 May,
Factiva.
Lumby, C. 1999, Gotcha: life in a tabloid world, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.
Mackenzie, K. 2003, ‘Far-right Hanson released from jail’, Guardian, 7 November,
viewed 7 May 2019, Factiva.
Madigan, M. 2010, ‘Julia Gillard: how broad is my accent?’, Courier Mail,
25 November, viewed 4 May 2019, www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/julia-gillard-
how-broad-is-my-accent/news-story/0bc5b2b06ec8e7a6bd444d8109ef720c?sv=f
74bebcfbf5b773ec35489ff0c4501b3.
Maiden, S. 2010, ‘All hail the Queen of the bogans’, Australian 7 October, viewed
5 May 2019, Factiva.
Maley, J. 2013, ‘Gillard’s gender opportunism puts feminists in a bind’, Sydney
Morning Herald, 12 June, viewed 4 May 2019, www.smh.com.au/federal-
politics/political-opinion/gillards-gender-opportunism-puts-feminists-in-a-bind-
20130612-2o3h0.html.
Marr, D. 1997, ‘Beyond the pale with Pauline’, Sydney Morning Herald, 12 May,
viewed 5 May 2019, Factiva.
Mason, R. 2010, ‘ “Pitbulls” and populist politicians: Sarah Palin, Pauline Hanson
and the use of gendered nostalgia in electoral campaigns’, Comparative
American Studies: An International Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 185–199.
McCabe, H. 1998a, ‘Forget policy, I’ve got great legs’, Daily Telegraph, 15
September, viewed 1 May 2019, Factiva.
McCabe H. 1998b, ‘Mother of all fashion statements’, Herald Sun, 15 September,
viewed 1 May 2019, Factiva.
McLean, J. & Maalsen, S. 2017 ‘ “We don’t want it to be like that for her again”:
gendered leadership and online feminism in Australian politics and planning’,
Australian Planner, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 24–32.
Political journalism 221
McRobbie, A. 2004, ‘Postfeminism and popular culture’, Feminist Media Studies,
vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 255–264.
McRobbie, A. 2009, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change,
Sage, London.
McRobbie, A. 2015, ‘Notes on the perfect: competitive femininity in neoliberal
times’, Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 3, no. 83, pp. 3–20.
Medhora, S. 2014, ‘Julie Bishop rejects term “feminist” as not useful in women in
media address’, Guardian, 29 October, viewed 4 May 2019, www.theguardian.
com/australia-news/2014/oct/29/julie-bishop-rejects-term-feminist-as-not-useful-
in-women-in-media-address.
Milligan, L. 1999, ‘Sex appeal and spotty frocks: media representations of women
politicians in the news media’, Metro Education, vol. 19, pp. 14–16.
Mitchell, M. 2000, ‘Beyond the fragments again: Germaine Greer and the politics of
feminism’, Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 67–77.
Moffitt, B. 2016, The global rise of populism: performance, political style, and
representation, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Moody, S. 2016, ‘Pauline Hanson claims women make frivolous domestic violence
complaints’, Sunshine Coast Daily, 10 June, viewed 4 May 2019, www.
sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/pauline-hanson-claims-women-make-frivolous-
dv-comp/3043038/.
Morris, M. 2000, ‘ “Please explain?”: ignorance, poverty and the past’, Inter-Asia
Cultural Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 219–232.
Morris, R. 1998 ‘How a bondage mistress duped a political novice’, Daily Tele-
graph, 19 September, Factiva.
Morrissey, T.E. 2012, ‘Best thing you’ll see all day: Australia’s female prime
minister rips misogynist a new one in epic speech on sexism’, Jezebel, October
10, viewed 4 May 2019, https://jezebel.com/best-thing-youll-see-all-day-
australias-female-prime-m-5950163.
Muir, K. 2005, ‘Media darlings and falling stars: celebrity and the reporting of
political leaders’, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, vol. 2, no.
2, pp. 54–71.
Munford, R. & Gillis, S. (eds) 2004, Third wave agenda: a critical exploration,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Munford, R. & Waters, M. 2014, Feminism and popular culture: investigating the
postfeminist mystique, Rutgers University Press, New York.
Murphy, D. 2010, ‘What a day: Australia gets its first female PM’, Sydney
Morning Herald, 25 June, viewed 4 May 2019, www.smh.com.au/politics/
federal/what-a-day-australia-gets-its-first-female-pm-20100624-z3p7.html.
Murphy, K. 2002, ‘Bitch: the politics of angry women’, PhD thesis, Murdoch
University, Western Australia.
Negra, D. 2009, What a girl wants? Fantasizing the reclamation self in postfemi-
nism, Routledge, New York.
Negra, D. & Holmes, S. (eds) 2011, In the limelight and under the microscope:
forms and functions of female celebrity, Bloomsbury Academic, London.
Norris, P. (ed.) 1997, Women, media, and politics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Nunn, H. 2002, Thatcher, politics and fantasy: the political culture of gender and
nature, Lawrence & Wishart, London.
Oakes, L. 2010, ‘A Liberal dose of bad news’, Herald Sun, 26 June, viewed 4 May
2019, Factiva.
222 Political journalism
Pearson, C. 2012, ‘Gender card hides failures’, Australian, 13 October, viewed
4 May 2019, Factiva.
Perera, S. 1999, ‘Whiteness and its discontents: notes on politics, gender, sex and
food in the year of Hanson’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, vol. 20, no. 2,
pp. 183–198.
Pilger, J. 2012, ‘Julia Gillard is no feminist hero’, Guardian, 16 October, viewed
4 May 2019, www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/15/julia-gillard-no-
feminist-hero.
‘PM calls for end to history wars’, ABC News online, 27 August 2009, viewed 4
May 2019, www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2009/s2669063.htm.
Poulsen, J. 2017, ‘Hanson and her ilk are not interested in women’s issues’, NT
News, 19 August, viewed 4 May 2019, www.ntnews.com.au/rendezview/
hanson-and-her-ilk-are-not-interested-in-womens-issues/news-story/9f19e56784f
0f572b49a513c5ceb793a.
Price, J. 2014, ‘What’s made Julie Bishop so afraid of feminism?’, Daily Life, 30
October, viewed 4 May 2019, www.dailylife.com.au/news-and-views/dl-opinion/
whats-made-julie-bishop-so-afraid-of-feminism-20141029-11dpw6.
Probyn, E. 1990, ‘New traditionalism and post-feminism: TV does the home’,
Screen, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 147–159.
Probyn, F. 1999, ‘ “That woman”: Pauline Hanson and cultural crisis’, Australian
Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 29, pp. 161–171.
Quaggin, L. 2016, ‘Julie Bishop says she won’t apologise for being feminine’,
Huffington Post, 18 October, viewed 25 April 2019, www.huffingtonpost.com.
au/2016/10/17/julie-bishop-says-she-wont-apologise-for-being-feminine_a_21583861/.
Remeikis, A. 2017, ‘One Nation leader Pauline Hanson wears burqa in senate
question time stunt’, Sydney Morning Herald, 17 August, viewed 25 April 2019,
www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/one-nation-leader-pauline-hanson-wears-full-
burqa-in-senate-question-time-stunt-20170817-gxyd5d.html.
Rolfe, M. 1999, ‘Free speech, political correctness and the rhetoric of social unity
under John Howard’, Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy, vol. 15,
pp. 36–45.
Rosenfelt, D. & Stacey J. 1990, ‘Second thoughts on the second wave’, in
K.V. Hansen & I.J. Philipson (eds), Women, class, and the feminist imagination:
a socialist feminist reader, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA,
pp. 549–567.
Ross, K. & Sreberny-Mohammadi, A. 1997, ‘Playing house: gender, politics
and the news media in Britain’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 19, no. 1,
pp. 101–109.
Rottenberg, C. 2018, The rise of neoliberal feminism, Oxford University Press,
Oxford.
Rourke, A. 2012, ‘Julia Gillard’s attack on sexism hailed as turning point for
Australian women’, Guardian, 13 October, viewed 4 May 2019, www.theguardian.
com/world/2012/oct/12/julia-gillard-sexism-australian-women.
Rutherford, J. 2001, ‘One love too many: the undoing of Pauline Hanson’,
Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 192–208.
Salemme, N. 2014, ‘Foreign Minister Julie Bishop talks fashion, running and per-
sonal style’, news.com.au, 5 December, viewed 25 April 2019, www.news.com.
au/lifestyle/fashion/foreign-minister-julie-bishop-talks-fashion-running-and-per
sonal-style/news-story/dd1a57072bdccbd5a01fa52513011575.
Political journalism 223
Sams, C. 2014, ‘Julie Bishop: a leader of style and substance’, Daily Telegraph,
18 December, viewed 25 April 2019, www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/
sydney-confidential/julie-bishop-a-leader-of-style-and-substance/news-story/
ab6b0e3d74bb2fee722aa6fb1c16410f.
Sawer, M. 1999, ‘EMILY’s list and angry white men: gender wars in the nineties’,
Journal of Australian Studies, vol. 23, no. 62, pp. 1–9.
Scharff, C. 2011, ‘Disarticulating feminism: individualization, neoliberalism and the
othering of “Muslim women” ’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 18,
no. 2, pp. 119–134.
Scharff, C. 2012, Repudiating feminism: young women in a neoliberal world,
Routledge, London.
Scott, L.M. 2006, Fresh lipstick: redressing fashion and feminism, St Martin’s
Press, New York.
Shanahan, D. 2012, ‘Labour continues with strategy of delusion’, Australian,
11 October, viewed 5 May, Factiva.
Sheehan, P. 2012, ‘Gender reveals true nature in playing gender card’, Sydney
Morning Herald, 10 October, viewed 25 April 2019, www.smh.com.au/politics/
federal/gillard-reveals-true-nature-in-playing-gender-card-20121010-27cnq.html.
Sheeler, K.H. & Anderson, K.V. 2013, Woman president: confronting postfeminist
political culture, Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
Skeggs, B. 1997, Formations of class and gender: becoming respectable, Sage,
London.
Snow, D. 2013, ‘The talented Miss Julie’, Sydney Morning Herald, 23 September,
viewed 25 April 2019, www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/the-
talented-miss-julie-20130920-2u58e.html.
Sorrentino, J. & Augoustinos, M. 2012, ‘ “I don’t view myself as a woman politi-
cian, I view myself as a politician who’s a woman” ’: the discursive management
of gender identity in political leadership’, The British Journal of Social Psych-
ology, vol. 55, pp. 385–406.
Sorrentino, J., Augoustinos, M., & Couteur, A.L. 2019, ‘ “[It] does not explain
everything, … nor does it explain nothing … it explains some things”: Australia’s
first female Prime Minister and the dilemma of gender’, Feminism & Psychology,
vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 19–39.
Squires, C.R. 2014, The post-racial mystique: media and race in the 21st century,
New York University Press, New York.
Stevenson, A. 1998, ‘Pauline Hanson: sex symbol’, Daily Telegraph, 20 June,
pp. 26–27.
Stevenson, A. 2013, ‘Making gender divisive: “post-feminism”, sexism and media
representations of Julia Gillard’, Burgmann Journal II, pp. 53–63.
Street, J. 2004, ‘Celebrity politicians: popular culture and political representa-
tion’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 6, no. 4,
pp. 435–452.
Sullivan, R. 2018, ‘Julie Bishop wears awesome power heels in resignation press
conference’, news.com.au, 28 August, viewed 25 April 2019, www.news.com.au/
lifestyle/fashion/people/julie-bishop-wears-awesome-power-heels-in-resignation-
press-conference/news-story/85cabd0ef3a2d4b565c3e9e9a5ba6284.
Summers, A. 2001, ‘A brief flowering of political destruction’, Sydney Morning
Herald, 15 February, viewed 5 May, Factiva.
Summers, A. 2013, The misogyny factor, New South Books, Sydney.
224 Political journalism
Tasker, Y. & Negra, D. 2007, ‘Introduction: feminist politics and postfeminist
culture’, in Y. Tasker & D. Negra (eds), Interrogating postfeminism: gender and
the politics of popular culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 1–25.
Taylor, A. 2012, Single women in popular culture: the limits of postfeminism, Pal-
grave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Taylor, A. 2015, ‘Behind every great woman? Celebrity, political leadership and
the privileging of marriage’, in S. Cobb & N. Ewen (eds), First comes love:
couples, celebrity kinship and cultural politics, Bloomsbury, London,
pp. 169–187.
Taylor, A. 2016, Celebrity and the feminist blockbuster, Palgrave Macmillan, Bas-
ingstoke.
Taylor, A. 2019, ‘Steve is twice the Aussie you’ll ever be: Germaine Greer, the
Crocodile Hunter’s death, and nationalistic misogyny’, European Journal of Cul-
tural Studies, doi.org/10.1177/1367549418821840.
Taylor, A. forthcoming, Femoir, Bloomsbury Academic, London.
Taylor, L. 2012, ‘PM’s speech did stir hearts, but remember the context’, Sydney
Morning Herald, 13 October, viewed 25 April 2019, www.smh.com.au/politics/
federal/pms-speech-did-stir-hearts-but-remember-the-context-20121012-27i1h.html.
‘The mother’s club’, 2002, the Sydney Morning Herald, 7 September, viewed 25
April 2019, www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/09/06/1031115937062.html.
Trimble, L. 2016, ‘Julia Gillard and the gender wars’, Gender and Politics, vol. 12,
pp. 296–316.
Trimble, L. 2017, Ms Prime Minister: gender, media and leadership, Toronto
University Press, Toronto.
Trioli, V. 1997, ‘So much talk, so little listening’, Age, 15 May, viewed 4 May
2019, Factiva.
Truman, I. 2018, ‘Julie Bishop slams the liberal party’s treatment of women’,
Marie Claire, 6 September, viewed 25 April 2019, www.marieclaire.com.au/
julie-bishop-slams-liberal-party.
Turner, G. 2004, Understanding celebrity, Sage, London.
Ustinoff, J. 2005, ‘The many faces of political Eve: representations of Queensland
women parliamentarians in the media’, Queensland Review, vol. 12, no. 2,
pp. 97–106.
Van Acker, E. 2003, ‘Media representations of women politicians in Australia and
New Zealand: high expectations, hostility or stardom’, Policy, Organisation &
Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 116–136.
Van Zoonen, L. 2006, ‘The personal, the political and the popular: a woman’s
guide to celebrity politics’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 9, no. 3,
pp. 287–301.
Varney, D. 2017, ‘ “Not now, not ever”: Julia Gillard and the performative power
of affect’, in E. Diamond, D. Varney, & C. Amich (eds), Performance, feminism
and affect in neoliberal times, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 25–38.
Vavrus, M. D. 2002, Postfeminist news: political women in media culture, State
University of New York Press, New York.
Walsh, C. 2015, ‘Media capital or media deficit? Representations of women in
leadership roles in old and new media’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 15, no. 6,
pp. 1025–1034.
Walshe, K. 2013, The stalking of Julia Gillard: how the media and team Rudd
brought down the prime minister, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.
Political journalism 225
Wearing, S. 2007, ‘Subjects of rejuvenation: aging in postfeminist culture’, in Y
Tasker & D Negra (eds), Interrogating postfeminism: gender and the politics of
popular culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 277–310.
Wheeler, M. 2013, Celebrity politics, Polity, London.
Whelehan, I. 2010, ‘Remaking feminism: or why is postfeminism so boring?’,
Nordic Journal of English Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 155–172.
Whelehan, I. & Gywnne, J. (eds) 2015, Ageing, popular culture and contemporary
feminism: harleys and hormones, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Williams, B. 2017, ‘A gendered media analysis of the prime ministerial ascension
of Gillard and Turnbull: he’s “taken back the reins” and “she’s a backstabbing
murderer”’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 550–564.
Winch, A. 2013, Girlfriends and postfeminist sisterhood, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke.
Worth, A., Hastie, B., & Augoustinos, M. 2016, ‘ “Playing the gender card”:
media representations of Julia Gillard’s sexism and misogyny speech’, Feminism
and Psychology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 52–72.
Wright, J. 2012, ‘Time PM stopped playing the gender card: Abbott’, Sydney
Morning Herald, 10 October, accessed via: www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/
time-pm-stopped-playing-the-gender-card-abbott-20121010-27c5u.html.
Wright, K. & Holland, J. 2014, ‘Leadership and the media: gendered framings of
Julia Gillard’s “sexism and misogyny” speech’, Australian Journal of Political
Science, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 455–468.
Conclusion
Australian postfeminism as popular
feminism
When we began our research for Postfeminism in Context, we did not neces-
sarily expect to find such a different approach to postfeminism expressed in
Australian popular culture. Our texts, however, have unsettled the critical
hegemony around this term, which sees a handful of theorists and their
approaches mapped onto cultural analyses, with little consideration for the
applicability or viability of an acontextual postfeminism. Such a method, we
have argued, can limit our ability to theorise the varied and complex ways in
which feminism is articulated in and through popular texts in culturally spe-
cific ways. Over the 20 or so years we have examined, we find Australian
popular culture has a much more complicated and productive engagement
with feminism than previous, and now semi-canonical, understandings of
postfeminism allow. Nevertheless, given the nature of transnationalism and
global political and cultural flows, including in terms of genre itself, not sur-
prisingly we have found some notable similarities between Australian texts
and Anglo-American texts – in particular, that postfeminism in some aspects
functions as a gendered form of neoliberalism.
Our readings resist a universalised postfeminist theory, offering instead
a more hopeful and nuanced picture in terms of how popular culture has
responded to feminism. Rather than an innate suspicion towards popular
culture – another quality limiting accounts of postfeminism – we have
allowed other possibilities to be seen. There are, of course, many tensions
and contradictions in the gendered representations we have examined, but
in general there is little ‘classic’ postfeminist disavowal of feminism, and
little evidence of an anti-feminist reaction. Instead, a clear and positive
recognition of changes in women’s lives occasioned by the women’s move-
ment is apparent, as well as an acknowledgement of the unfinished busi-
ness of modern feminism, most notably: the tensions between work and
care demands, the constraints of conventional ideologies of femininities,
the need for freedom as well as intimacy, and the structural and discursive
obstacles to personal fulfilment. As popular culture attempts to process
and work through second wave feminism’s legacy, it also points to the
necessity of further feminist work – including in terms of the cultural pol-
itics of the mainstream imaginary.
Conclusion 227
Unlike other scholars who, in recent accounts of postfeminism, see such
incorporation of feminism by popular culture as a form of instrumentalisa-
tion (Gill & Orgad 2015; Gill 2017; Banet-Weiser 2018; Kanai 2019) that
ultimately undermines feminism in the same way disavowal does, a less
troubling relationship emerges in our analyses. As we have made clear
throughout, Australian postfeminism for us is both after and informed by
second wave feminism. The semioscapes we have identified clearly demon-
strate that the representational landscape in Australia, across a number of
forms and texts, has been irrevocably altered by second wave feminism:
another form of unsettling. These texts, by and large, are comfortable
with, if not celebrate, women’s relative emancipation – whether bodily,
sexual, economic, affective, or intellectual.
Our first case study, chick lit’s semioscape of aspiration and independ-
ence, reveals how work for women is taken for granted, and female
pleasure is guilt-free and valid, two thematics that mark virtually every
form examined. The semioscape of postfeminist kinship characterising
television dramedy demonstrates an expanded range of definitions of the
family and a reduced importance of heterosexual relations to women’s
self-definition and life course – another two features that are shared across
genres. Women’s magazines and their semioscape of abundance also prop-
agate an extended range of femininities and life choices for women. The
semioscape of confidence and care that we find in our beauty vloggers
evinces a reworked but powerful form of mediated sisterhood and fem-
inine expertise that helps young women to cope with the disciplinary
apparatus of the fashion–beauty–media complex. And while self-help’s
semioscape of calculating magic tells a similarly problematic story, this
time of coping as a woman in neoliberal Australia, the sense of self-worth
and agency we identified signals an energised and energetic female subject
who (like the vloggers) should not be readily dismissed as being a bearer of
neoliberal false consciousness. However, our final semioscape of con-
strained power is a sobering reminder of how certain domains – namely,
the mediated form of institutional political power – want to hang onto an
older Australia via prescriptive versions of a feminine, non-feminist,
correctness.
On another less positive note, although some of our texts have engaged
explicitly with race and how it intersects with gender (particularly in
Chapter 1), we have identified a flattening of cultural and ethnic difference
which is troubling in light of Australia’s history of colonialism and dispos-
session of Indigenous people, and post-Second World War migration. If
women of colour do feature in narratives, as is the case with chick lit, a
Western postfeminism is very much the ideal. Unfortunately, Australian
postfeminism does appear to bear out Gisela Kaplan’s (1996), among
others’, contention that white women were the main beneficiaries of
second wave feminism. Another concern is the ongoing anxieties nearly
every semioscape displays regarding the importance of physical appearance
228 Conclusion
(and its related issue of ageing) to women’s self-worth and identity. And
there is no denying the impact of neoliberalism as an ideologico-historical
context, especially in genres such as self-help, and in the permeation of
certain tenets of neoliberalism throughout: the related notions of the entre-
preneurial self, the project of the self, and the management required of the
self at all levels of being. Even so, it is reductive to see postfeminism as just
a form or ‘helpmate’ of neoliberalism; rather, postfeminism is located at
the nexus of the aftermath of second wave feminism and the neoliberal
turn, and particular elements of both are complementary (just as second
wave feminism emerged at a juncture in late capitalism that was beneficial
to both). So, for instance, the agentic self of feminism is echoed by the
entrepreneurial self of neoliberalism; the sexually liberated woman of fem-
inism finds parallels in the hedonistic consumer of neoliberalism. Regard-
less, it is incorrect to see such echoes and overlaps as unambiguous
evidence of neoliberalism’s dominance and/or its incorporation of feminist
demands and gains. To do so is to delegitimise the feminist project –
making it a dupe of capitalism – and to ignore the expanded range of free-
doms available to predominantly white Australian women (and the
aspirations to these freedoms by those women who are still yet to benefit).
Moreover, to read postfeminism as only indicative of the limits of gen-
dered neoliberalism is to underrate readers and audiences. Much recent
scholarship that seeks to mine ostensibly ‘postfeminist’ texts for signs of
their antifeminism fails to take account of sophisticated audience responses
to them (Horbury 2014) and undermines the legitimacy of reader or audi-
ence pleasure. That is, reinforcing the ‘cultural dupe’-style position long
critiqued by cultural studies, the emphasis on the seemingly regressive pol-
itics of such texts (which themselves are also polysemic and thus open to
disruption) and their effects on women audiences, presumes that readers
and viewers need to have such texts demystified by the feminist critic in the
know (Brunsdon 2000). It also presumes that readers cannot think criti-
cally while simultaneously experiencing the pleasures of the text. We find
that being open to wider interpretive possibilities than current invocations
of postfeminism allow confirms that popular culture is made-to-mean in a
variety of ways, by diverse audiences who use their own ‘mattering maps’
(Grossberg 1992) to make use of these popular narratives. And part of this
is treating women’s desires for cultural pleasure with respect rather than
with automatic suspicion.
Through the aggregation of these varied case studies, we contend that
Australian postfeminism, by and large, can be seen as a transitional stage
between second wave feminism and the full emergence of a new, as yet
unnamed form of feminist politics, which can operate within (and hope-
fully resist) consumer capitalism and neoliberalism. When this new fem-
inism more fully emerges, postfeminism will no longer relate to the
contemporary, but instead will become a concept that describes the recent
past. Popular culture has always been central to attempts to expand the
Conclusion 229
reach of feminism and to make it intelligible to as wide an audience as pos-
sible, and Australian media has been no exception (Henderson 2006;
Taylor 2008). Texts that have been deemed ‘postfeminist’ are merely part
of this much longer process of cultural translation (Fuller & Driscoll
2015). While critics have recently considered popular feminism as just
another, more crafty, articulation of postfeminism (Gill 2016; Banet-
Weiser 2018), in light of our findings in the Australian context we would
suggest that postfeminism is but a form of feminism in the popular (see
Genz & Brabon 2009; Fuller & Driscoll 2015). This need not lead to its
uncritical celebration, of course, nor a neglect of the ways in which the
State and corporations do attempt to manage and profit from feminism.
But it does resist a simplistic pessimism and an ignorance of feminist
change, instead emphasising feminism’s presence and role in popular
culture, and popular culture’s imbrication with everyday life, institutional
power, and political demands made by women. We ignore, or downplay,
the potential of popular culture in making a new feminist activist move-
ment at our peril.
But why might Australian postfeminist culture take this unsettling, non-
reactionary form compared to other contexts? We surmise that a combina-
tion of national cultural characteristics, the history of Australian second
wave feminism, and the ways in which neoliberalism has played out in this
country are factors. First, Australia does not have such a powerful Chris-
tian conservative right as the United States (though it is starting to
emerge), which has campaigned vociferously for years against feminism
and women’s rights. So, for example, the postfeminist trope of maternal
retreatism that Diane Negra (2009) identifies in US popular culture, gains
little traction here. Second, Australia’s uptake of neoliberalism, while far-
reaching, was also to an extent ameliorated, even disguised (in imagined, if
not in actual policy terms) by a continuing Australian ethos of fairness and
egalitarianism embedded in the welfare state, and a long period of afflu-
ence. In such a context, women’s postfeminist demands for equality and
fair treatment, and the legitimacy of these demands, do not align with neo-
liberalism’s ruthless individualism. Moreover, Australia avoided post-GFC
austerity measures. We suspect that economic prosperity – even if une-
qually shared – has some role in a lack of mean-spiritedness, a sense of
potential, exhibited across the semioscapes. Complementing this is the
success of the Australian women’s movement in widespread attitudinal
changes (that partly relied on the enduring Australian mythology of egalit-
arianism) and the rollout of policies and programmes benefiting women in
the mid-1970s onwards via the femocrat strategy. It is now taken for
granted that many women will be educated, have a career, lead full and
pleasurable lives, and be cultural producers, and that there are still barriers
to their equal participation and achievement. Consider, for instance, the
2019 Australian Federal election, in which ‘women’s issues’ were arguably
foregrounded more than ever before. And note that postfeminist culture is
230 Conclusion
often made by women, and feminism’s legacy is in their cultural
production.
We end with a few final thoughts regarding the concept of postfeminism
itself. If what we have found is that Australian postfeminism unsettles
dominant ways of conceptualising the intersections of feminism and popular
culture, what of the critical efficacy of the term itself? Should it continue to
be used, but with more nuance and regard to cultural and historical con-
texts, or is there a better way of thinking through the complexities of the
representational field when it comes to gender? Ultimately, we concur with
Rosalind Gill that postfeminism ‘should not be the only term in our critical
lexicon, but it does still have something to offer’ (2016, p. 612; see also
Keller & Ryan 2018). The critical practice we have employed here suggests
that it can be strategically useful, especially if we open the term up to re-
signification to allow for cultural, historical and political specificity; if we
are less preoccupied with designating texts and practices themselves ‘post-
feminist’; and if we turn our focus to the kinds of feminisms that are being
‘summoned’ and the ways in which they might (or might not) speak to
diverse audiences (Whelehan 2010, p. 128; McDermott 2018; Kanai 2019).
We have also argued that it is vital to attend to what Gill (2017) has
described as ‘the psychic life of postfeminism’, further coming to terms with
its affective pull. Indeed, our attention to its affective aspects has enabled a
more generous reading of postfeminist culture. And finally, the relationship
between feminism and popular culture has long been a complex one, and
here we hope to have offered some sense of both the limitations and the
possibilities of using a concept like postfeminism to help understand a
popular cultural field that, without doubt, bears a significant indebtedness
to Australian second wave feminism. Australian postfeminism is, therefore,
a potential crucible for a new and as yet unnamed feminist politics that can
continue the task of political, cultural, and social unsettling.
References
Banet-Weiser, S. 2018, Empowered: popular feminism and popular misogyny,
Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Brunsdon, C. 2000, The feminist, the housewife, and soap opera, Oxford Univer-
sity Press, Oxford.
Fuller, S. & Driscoll, C. 2015, ‘HBO’s Girls: gender, generation, and quality tele-
vision’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 29, no. 2,
pp. 253–262.
Genz, S. & Brabon, B.A. 2009, Postfeminism: cultural texts and theories, Edin-
burgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Gill, R. 2016, ‘Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times,’
Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 610–630.
Gill, R. 2017, ‘The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: a postfemi-
nist sensibility 10 years on’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 20, no. 6,
pp. 606–626.
Conclusion 231
Gill, R. & Orgad, S. 2015, ‘The confidence cult(ure)’, Australian Feminist Studies,
vol. 30, no. 86, pp. 324–344.
Grossberg, L. 1992, ‘Is there a fan in the house? The affective sensibility of
fandom’, in L. Lewis (ed.), The adoring audience: fan culture and popular media,
Routledge, New York, pp. 50–68.
Henderson, M. 2006, Marking feminist times: remembering the longest revolution
in Australia, Peter Lang, Bern.
Horbury, A. 2014, ‘Post-feminist impasses in popular heroine television’, Contin-
uum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 213–225.
Kanai, A. 2019, Gender and relatability in digital culture: managing affect,
intimacy and value, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Kaplan, G. 1996, The meagre harvest: the Australian women’s movement 1950s–
1990s, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Keller, J. & Ryan, M.E. 2018, ‘Introduction: mapping emergent feminisms’, in
J. Keller & M.E. Ryan (eds), Emergent feminisms: complicating a postfeminist
media culture, Routledge, London, pp. 1–22.
McDermott, C. 2018, ‘How to survive the postfeminist impasse: Grace Helbig’s
affective aesthetics’, Girlhood Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 50–66.
Negra, D. 2009, What a girl wants? Fantasizing the reclamation of self in postfem-
inism, Routledge, London.
Taylor, A. 2008, Mediating Australian feminism: re-reading The first stone media
event, Peter Lang, Oxford.
Whelehan, I. 2010, ‘Remaking feminism: or why is postfeminism so boring?’,
Nordic Journal of English Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 155–172.
Index
Abdel-Fattah, R. 30, 32–5, 42–3, 48–9 Avoiding Mr Right 29–30, 32–55, 38,
advertising 10, 27, 51n3, 93, 96 42–3, 47, 49
advice: in chick lit 34–5; self-help Awad, A. 30, 32, 34, 36, 42–3, 47–8
155–6, 158, 161, 171–2, 175–6,
178–9; in vlogs 17, 123–6, 130–7, Bail, K. 7–8, 10, 194
140, 143, 146; in women’s magazines Banet-Weiser, S. 14, 124, 129, 130,
91–2, 97, 99, 100, 104–5, 110–12 147n2, 188
aestheticisation 102–4, 106, 165–6, beauty 17, 207; and chick lit 32–3, 43,
171–8 46–7; and self-help 171, 175; and
affect 144, 156, 203–4; negative vlogs 123–5, 128, 130–1, 136–7; and
37–41, 143; see also postfeminism women’s magazines 90, 95, 99, 107,
affect 115; see also fashion-beauty-media
affective bonds 16, 57–8, 60–6, 72, 75, complex
80–1 beauty vlogs/vloggers 17; and
affective labour 62, 64–6, 131, 139, automediality 124–5; and digital
141, 144; see also emotional labour intimacy 125–7; transnationalism
affluence 17, 26, 31, 36, 45, 229 127–8; and YouTube 128–9; see also
Air Kisses 30, 32–6, 38, 42, 46, 48 Curtis, L. and Mansutti, D
Alderson, M. 29–30, 32, 38, 40–2, 47 belaboured self 159, 170
Appadurai, A. 4, 6, 127 Berlant, L. 60, 66, 127, 144, 146
aspirationalism 17, 132, 135, 137, 179, Bishop, J. 18, 44, 187–90, 195, 200,
208–9; see also chick lit; women’s 205–12
magazines Blair, T. 190, 196
authenticity 5; and chick lit 39, 41; and blokette 100–1
self-help 159, 168, 170–5, 178–9; Bonner, F. 90, 92, 115n2
and vlogs 124–33, 141–3, 148n6; see Bourdieu, P. 47, 51n3, 102, 104
also inauthenticity brands 44, 104, 167–8, 170, 197; and
austerity 38, 136, 229 self-branding 123–8, 130–2, 138–9,
Australian, The 196, 200, 202, 204–5, 141, 177–8, 201–2; see also Bishop, J
214n3 Bridget Jones’s Diary 26, 42, 47,
Australian governments: Australian 52n13, 57, 63
Labor Party 38, 96, 203–4, 52n14; Brown, H. 96
Liberal-National Party 7–9, 116n8, Butler, Jess 29, 62, 99, 213
206, 211 Butler, Judith 99, 191, 203, 206
Australian Labor Party (ALP) 8, 33, 38,
199–200, 202, 209 calculating magic 18, 155–6, 160,
Australian Women’s Weekly 17, 78, 91, 162–8, 170–3, 175–80
108–14, 211–12 Campaign Ruby 30, 32–3, 35–6, 38,
automediality 124–5, 132, 140 42, 47
Index 233
care of self 15, 47, 124, 140, 145, 169 couples 58, 63, 76, 81–2
care of others 10, 226, 227; and Courier Mail 201, 214n3
dramedy 60, 64–9, 71–4; and self- Courting Samira 30, 32–3, 34, 36,
help 155; and vlogs 123–7, 131; and 42–3, 47–8
women’s magazines 112–13; see also cultural intermediaries 27, 31, 51n3,
sisterhood 51n8
careers 16, 189, 191; and chick lit 32, Curtis, L. 124, 128–37
34–6, 39; and dramedies 62–3,
69–71, 80; and self-help 158, 161, Daily Telegraph 195, 199, 214n3
172, 176–8; and women’s magazines depression 124, 136–9, 171
101, 105, 109–10, 114; and vlogs 128 detraditionalisation 59, 64, 67, 74
celebrity, celebrification 14, 18; and Dobson, A. 100, 124–5, 127, 129–30,
vlogs 137, 139–40; and politicians 139–40, 144, 146
189, 195, 199, 208–9; and micro- domesticity 101, 104, 108–14, 117n21
celebrity 126, 128, 131–2, 135, 138, Dosekun, S. 4–6, 127
140–1; and women’s magazine 90, dramedy 35, 58, 60–1, 75; Offspring
97, 109–10, 112–13, 125–6 61–71; Winners and losers 71–80
Chanel sweethearts 30, 33, 38–42, 44, dreamscape 17, 44, 62, 78, 82, 90–115
46–7, 51n8 Driscoll, C. 12–14, 147n1, 229
chick lit: Anglo-American 29, 31, 37,
62, 63, 226; bildung 28, 30, 43–4, economic growth 17, 31, 37, 38; see
50; emergence of 28–9; and non- also affluence
Western 47, 50, 52n12 economic rationalism 20n8
choice: and lifestyle 68–70, 157, 206; egalitarianism 11, 37–40, 95–9,
and self-help 164, 172, 179; 107–13, 200–9, 229
postfeminist discourses of 6, 57, 192, Elder, C. 37, 209
201, 227 emotional labour 16, 58, 67, 124, 170
cities see urban settings Energise your career: a guide to how
class: and Australia 2, 27, 36–41, 44, any woman can have the success she
102; inequality 37, 78, 99, 229; wants 176–8
middle classes 27–32, 40–6, 78, 99, entrepreneurialism 8–9, 139, 160–5,
105–8, 111–14; and postfeminism 4, 170, 197, 228
31, 52n12, 52n13; and working everyday philosophy see calculating
classes 37–41, 50, 114, 188, 193–5, magic
200–9 experience, power of 50, 73–5, 125–7,
Cleo 17, 90–2, 94–102, 104–5, 107, 130–6, 140–5, 164–8; see also
116n4, 123 authenticity
community 59, 80, 82, 159, 167; and
on-line 17, 126, 129–30, 138, 140 ‘fair go’, the see egalitarianism
confidence culture 128, 142, 146, familialism 61, 73, 81; see also family
177–8 family: traditional 16, 59–61, 71–2,
consumerism 16–18, 209, 228; and 78–81, 108–13, 174; and non-
chick lit 26, 32, 37–9, 41–3, 45–8, traditional 59, 61–70, 73, 81, 130
50; and self-help 171, 175; and fashion 33, 43, 93–9, 106, 189, 206–8;
women’s magazines 90–1, 101, 104, see also fashion-beauty-media
108, 113–15 complex
conspicuous consumption 10, 27, 43, fashion-beauty complex see fashion-
44, 50, 75 beauty-media complex
corporeality 46–7, 165 fashion-beauty-media complex 16,
Cosmopolitan 17, 28, 90–2, 95–102, 27–8, 31–6, 46–50, 102–7, 113–15;
104–7, 114 see also fashion
cosmopolitanism 51n6, 91, 102, femininities: conventional 17, 47;
104–6, 192 corporeal 165; non western 50;
234 Index
femininities continued 165–71; mental health 137–43; see
postindustrial 16, 17, 27, 28, also fitness
45–9, 109 The healthy life: a complete plan for
feminism: Australian 6–9, 14–18, 67, glowing skin, a healthy gut, weight
96, 189, 213; and consciousness- loss, better sleep and less stress 165–8
raising 18, 34, 77, 156–8, 163, 180; Hedley-Ward, J. 171–5
DIY 7–8, 17, 164, 194; emergent 14, hedonism 4, 16, 27–8, 41–5, 50, 91,
228–30; instrumentalisation of 14, 99, 114
143, 156–7, 161, 166, 227; neoliberal Heiss, A. 29–30, 32–5, 38, 42–3, 47, 49
15, 176; and self-help 156–8, 166; as Henderson, M. 7, 13, 19n2, 20, 77–8,
spectral 14, 147, 157, 180; third 229
wave 7, 8, 15, 19n6, 19n7, 207 Herald Sun 196, 199, 214n3, 214n9
fetish see fetishism heteronormativity 67–8, 76, 98, 134,
fetishism 27, 31, 42–5, 47–50, 156
52n11, 208 heterosexuality 42–8, 62–9, 79–82,
fitness see also wellness 155–6, 158, 91–5, 134, 175
161, 165–71, 180n2 Holmes, S. 107, 110, 119, 208
Foster, Z. 30, 32–6, 38, 42, 46, 48 homemaker 78, 85n24, 109, 111, 113,
Frankie 99, 116n5 172
Freud, S. 42, 52n11, 93–4, 97, 99, 114 housewife see homemaker
Friedan, B. 77–8, 115, 148n10, 158 Howard, J. 7–9, 78, 116n8, 191–3,
friends see friendship
214n4
friendship 49, 59, 61, 66–7, 71–6,
humour 28, 49, 65, 81
79–82; see also sisterhood
inauthenticity 27, 31–3, 36, 47
Genz, S. 14, 42, 104, 109, 131–2
Indigenous women 29–34, 47, 62, 95,
Genz, S., and Brabon, B. 5, 12–13, 59
112–13, 128
Gill, R.: efficacy of postfeminism as a
individualism 6–10, 18–19, 57–64,
term 4, 14, 230; feminist visibility
14–15, 157, 190; neoliberalism 10, 192–7, 205, 229; and
155; makeover culture 44, 73, 112, individualisation 59, 138, 145, 157,
169, 179; postfeminist canon 57; 178, 210
postfeminist sensibility 5; psychic life intimacy 16, 32, 226; and
of postfeminism 15, 126, 230; detraditionalisation 59–61, 79–80;
women’s magazines 90–1, 99, 106 and the family 61–7; and friends 71,
Gillard, J. 18, 187–90, 199–205 76; and spatiality 76–9; digital
girl power 166n9, 194 intimacy 125–7, 148n6; and self-love
girls 17, 72–6, 100, 123–7, 133–7, 129, 137; digital intimacy and
141–5; as postfeminist ideal 10, negative affect 138–41; and self-help
129, 147n1, 159; sexualisation of 163, 167
91, 116n9 intimate publics 17, 115, 123–7, 133,
Global Financial Crisis 38, 229 139, 144–6
glocalisation 63, 71, 92, 107, 162, 194
Goddess 164; domestic 109, 111, Jacenko, R. 29–30, 34, 37, 42, 44
117n21; see also homemaker Jermyn, D. 92, 107, 208–9
Greer, G. 77, 112, 148n10
Guardian, the 222 Kanai, A. 13–15, 143–4, 146, 156, 227,
Gucci mamas 30, 33, 38–42, 44, 230
46–7, 51n8 Keating, P. 52n14, 192
Kendall, C. 30, 33, 38–42, 44, 46–7,
Hanson, P. 18, 34, 187–90, 193–9 51n8
Harris, A. 10, 126, 129, 131, 146 Kinship 57–62, 65–73, 76, 81, 123,
Health 99, 113, 124–6, 155–8, 161–3, 145
Index 235
larrikin 49, 96 Negra, D. 34, 68–9, 77, 109, 171–3, 229
Lean in 70, 176; see also Sandberg, S. neoliberalism: Australian 7–11, 26–8,
Lifestyle 7; and chick lit 33, 37, 39, 44; 50, 179, 200–1, 227–9; and gender
and self-help 157–8, 168; and vlogs 6–10, 18, 156, 172–9, 210, 226;
131, 133, 137, 139; and women’s feminist 13–15, 45, 155–6, 176,
magazines 96–9, 106–12 179–80, 228; postfeminist 10, 59, 81,
Lighten up: a female’s modern day 123–7, 134–8, 142–6; vitalism 169,
guide to physical transformation 177
165–6, 168–70 The New Woman 42, 44, 65, 90
‘Love Your Body’ 143 No sex in the city 30, 34, 36, 44, 49
Luxury 38, 42–50, 90–1, 102–6, Not meeting Mr Right 29–30, 32–5, 38,
113–14, 173–5; items 31, 37, 39, 48, 42–3, 47, 49
208–9; see also conspicuous
consumption Offspring 16, 35, 58, 61–71, 80–2
ordinariness 45, 78, 108–13, 125–8,
Mansutti, D. 124, 128, 132–5, 137–45 132–4, 139
Mad about the boy 29–30, 32, 38,
40–2, 47 Pants on fire 29–30, 32, 38, 40–2, 47
Manhattan dreaming 29–30, 32–5, 38, Paris dreaming 29–30, 32–5, 38, 42–3,
42–3, 47, 49 47, 49
Marie Claire 17, 44, 90–2, 94, 101–2, pecuniary emulation 43, 45; see also
104–14, 115n1 conspicuous consumption
marriage 33–6, 58, 68, 71–7, 109–10, perfectionism 36, 135, 142, 144, 161,
192 166–8
Martin-McDonald, K. 176–8 Playing the field 30
Marwick, A. 124–5, 131–2, 140 pleasure 17, 227–8; chick lit 32, 36,
masculinity 35, 43, 65, 84n17, 82n2 41–6, 48–50; dramedies 69; political
maternalism 58–9, 83, 167, 171–5, journalism 207; self-help 166, 170–1,
192–3, 229 192; vlogs 131, 144; women’s
McRobbie, A.: disavowal of feminism magazines 91, 93–7, 99–101, 114
3, 5, 26, 95, 115, 189; fashion- political leadership 187–92, 195,
beauty complex 4, 27; maternalism 200–1, 203, 206, 211–12
58–9, 69; neoliberalism 10, 208; politicians see Bishop, J; Gillard, J;
postfeminist femininity 48, 63, 79, Hanson, P; Howard, J; and Keating, P
101, 123, 139; perfectionism 36, popular culture, Australian 1–3, 8, 13,
125, 161, 166; pessimism 12–13; 18–19, 96, 226, 228–30
sexualisation of girls 91, 100; women popular feminism 1–8, 14–19, 91–6,
workers 31–3, 176 100, 115, 226–30
Media see social media positive thinking 36, 161, 164, 167,
migrants, migration 3, 19, 189, 193, 178; see also positivity
197, 227 positivity 135, 137–8, 140–1, 169,
misogyny 15, 188–90, 199, 201–5, 211, 174, 178
213; see also sexism postfeminism: academic accounts of
mononormativity 63 1–15; affect 15, 101, 155, 163, 179,
mothers see mothering 230; Anglo-American 1, 4, 6, 14,
mothering: and television 58, 61–72, 62–3, 226; efficacy of term 11, 230;
77–8; and magazines 95, 99, 101, and ‘Having it all’ 16, 58, 64, 70,
105, 109–13; and self-help 156, 147n1
171–5, 179, 180n2; and politicians postfordism 26–32, 37–40, 44–50,
192, 196–7, 204, 209 51n3, 102, 104
post-gender 187, 189–91, 212
narrators 58, 62, 64 postindustrial 4, 51; femininities 17,
nationalism 96, 112, 193, 196, 213 31–2
236 Index
postraditionalism 157; families 59, 131 social mobility 28, 32, 38–40, 112
pregnancy 66, 68, 70, 73, 110, 197 Spotlight: a Jazzy Lou novel, The
29–30, 34, 37, 42, 44
recessionary culture 38, 160 Strictly confidential: a Jazzy Lou novel
relationships see marriage; romantic 29–30, 34, 37, 42, 44
love suburbia 59, 62, 76–9
reparative reading 3, 14 Sydney Morning Herald 71, 192–7,
retraditionalisation 58, 60, 79–80, 171; 201–2, 204, 211
see also retreatism
retreatism 69, 77, 81, 174; domestic 34, Tasker, Y and Negra, D. 4, 6, 38, 81,
70, 91, 109, 192, 197; maternal 34, 160, 169, 173
171, 173, 229 Taylor, A. 10, 68, 137, 156–7,
romance: narratives 31–6, 41–6, 49–50, 200, 229
80–2, 134, 159 Thatcher, M. 188, 194, 202,
romantic love 26–8, 31–2, 42–50, 58, 205–6, 214n7
74–80, 109 therapeutic value see therapy culture
Roper, H. 165–6, 168–70 therapy culture 157–9, 162, 174
Rose, N. 9, 139, 159, 163, 177 Tiddas 29–30, 32–5, 38, 42–3, 47, 49
Rottenberg, C. 15, 70, 176, 208 Transnationalism: and chick lit 50; and
Ruby blues 30, 32–3, 35–6, 38, 42, 47 postfeminism 4–5, 10, 101, 226; and
Rudd, J. 30, 32–3, 35–6, 38, 42, 47 postfordism 28; and self-help 159;
Rumour mill: a Jazzy Lou novel, The and vlogs 123, 127–8, 145–6; and
29–30, 34, 37, 42, 44 women’s magazines 109, 112
Trump, D. 15, 193, 214n5
Sandberg, S. 70, 176 Turner, G. 126, 129, 148n5
self-actualisation see self-help; see also
calculating magic urban settings 30, 37, 44, 76
self-help 1, 9, 17–18; career advice 156,
178, 18n15; health and fitness 155–8, Versace Sisters 30, 33, 38–42, 44,
161, 165–71, 174–5, 180n2; industry 46–7, 51n8
159, 161, 168, 170, 176; mothering vlogs 2, 9, 15, 17, 115, 123–49
guides 156, 171–5; self-actualisation
70, 155–8, 160–3, 168–70, 174; see wellness 103, 107, 168
also therapy culture Whelehan, I. 12, 36–7, 42, 48,
self-love 128, 133, 142–3, 146, 168 90–1, 230
self-reflexivity 59, 125, 144; Whitlam, G. 9, 96, 116n10
postfeminist 42, 49–50, 59; parodic Winch, A. 48, 73, 75–6, 126, 140,
feminist 16, 28, 41–2, 50 175, 207
semioscapes 1, 4–5, 15, 19, 227, 229 Winners and losers 16, 58, 61–2, 67–9,
Sepel, J. 165–8 71–82, 113
service industries 11, 26 women: and ageing 17, 67, 107, 207–9,
Sex and the city 57, 62, 71–2, 74–5, 213, 228; and beauty 17, 47, 49–50;
79, 208 Indigenous women 3, 19, 95, 112,
sexism 188–90, 196, 199–01, 203–5, 114, 128; lesbian 3, 99–100, 113;
213, 214n4, 215n22 migrant 3, 19; working women
sexuality 2, 40–1, 60–1, 91, 96, 124, 10–11, 31–6; young women 5, 12,
158, 161, 163, 175, 180n2, 188–90, 16–17; chick lit 28, 31–2, 36, 45,
195–6 49–51; dramedies 59, 79; vlogs
Sheridan, S. 6, 108, 113 125–9, 137–9, 144–5; women’s
sisterhood 49, 61, 72–6, 124–7, 167–8, magazines 91–7; see also girls
227; see also beauty vlogs Women’s magazines: layout of 96–7,
social media 90, 124–9, 135–7, 102–13, 175; and plenitude 17, 91,
140–5, 177 108–13, 175; readers of 90–7, 105,
Index 237
108, 110–11, 114; as wish fulfillment You can . . . live the life of your dreams
17, 94, 106, 114; see also Australian 160–1, 163, 167
Women’s Weekly; Cleo; Younger man, The 30, 32–6, 38, 42,
Cosmopolitan; Frankie; Marie Claire 46, 48
work 10–11; in chick lit 31–4, 40, 51; You sexy mother: a life changing
in dramedies 66, 71–2; segregation approach to motherhood 171–3, 175
51n4; in self-help 159, 173, 179–8; in YouTube 1–2, 17; see also beauty
vlogs 139; in women’s magazines vlogs/vloggers
105–6, 112, 115; see also careers ‘Yummy Mummies’ 171–5
Wrong girl, The 30, 32–6, 38, 42,
46, 48