Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B. Bsce 3B
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B. Bsce 3B
BSCE 3B
Example 7.4 For the years 2012–2013, the financial statements of XYZ Company are
given in Tables 7.8 and 7.9. Define the performance ratios of the company.
o Answer 7.4 The 2012 performance ratios of XYZ Corporation are…
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
o
7.4.3 Economic Value Added
Developed by Stern Stewart & Company in 1989, economic value added (EVA) is an
improved valuation method for asset-intensive companies or projects.
EVA is defined as the after-tax-adjusted net operating income of a company minus the total
cost of capital spent during the same accounting period.
It is also equal to the return on capital minus the cost of capital, or the economic value above
and beyond the cost of capital (Stewart 2013; Ismail 2011). Sometimes EVA is also called
economic profit. In equation form, it is defined as
EVA may also be applied to a single project by calculating the after-tax cash flows generated by
the project minus the cost of capital spent for the project. For example, the NPV equation can be modified
as follows:
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
The significance of the balanced scorecard lies in its balanced focus on both short-term actions as
well as long-term corporate growth. Spending adequate company effort on innovation to bring
out new products is promoting long-term health.
Ideally, metrics should be set up to track outcomes in both short-term performance and long-term
health, which is related to company growth prospects, capabilities, relationships, and assets, to
enable future cash flows.
Companies must create metrics to track outcome in both performance and health. Specifically,
Kaplan (1996) advocates the use of a total of 15–20 metrics to cover these four areas to guide the
company as it moves forward.
As an illustrative example, the balanced scorecard metrics for a manufacturing company may
contain the following:
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
In general, balanced scorecard metrics for a given company must be developed according to
its corporate strategy and vision, using a top-down approach. Doing so will ensure that
performance metrics at lower management levels are properly aligned with the overall
corporate goals. A unique strength of balanced scorecard metrics is that they link the
company’s long-term strategy with its short-term actions.
Marketing and Refining Division raised its standing from last to first in its industry after
having implemented a balanced scorecard.
o Person (2013) recommends that managers, when implementing a balanced scorecard,
o take personal ownership,
o nurture a core group of champions,
o educate team members,
o keep the program simple,
o integrate the scorecard into their own leadership systems,
o orchestrate the dynamics of scorecard meetings,
o communicate the scorecard widely,
o resist the urge for perfection,
o be ruthless about implementation,
o and look beyond the numbers to achieve cultural transformation of the company.
Contributions made by engineering managers in these nonfinancial areas will likely become
readily and more favorably recognized in the future.
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
The capital received by issuing stocks has a cost made up of the following components: the cost of
equity capital, which includes the stock issuing fees; the dividends to be paid in future years; and the
capital gains through stock price appreciation expected by investors in the future. Typically, this cost
of equity is set to equal the return of an equity calculated by using the well-known capital asset
pricing model (CAPM) (Hart 2014). The CAPM defines the return of an equity as (see Figure 7.1)
Since the value of Beta is based on historical data, numerous financial analysts view it as a major
deficiency of the CAPM model. Another deficiency is its lack of timing constraints. The same cost is
assumed to be valid for capital projects of a 2- or 10-year duration. In practice, when evaluating a specific
capital investment project, some companies adjust the value of Beta manually in order to arrive at a
pertinent cost of equity capital.
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
Debt is the liabilities incurred by the company to make contractual payments (e.g.,
interest payments) under specified terms.
Debt represents a fixed prior claim against the company’s assets and poses a financial
risk to the company.
Debts are usually secured by a certain part of the company’s assets.
Creditors have the legal power to enforce payments and thus potentially drive companies
into bankruptcy.
When a company declares bankruptcy, it must satisfy the claims of creditors in a specific
order:
o (a) secured debts (bonds or loans),
o (b) lawyers’ fees,
o (c) unpaid wages, and
o (d) stockholders.
Note that bankruptcy lawyers have a payment priority ahead of the hardworking
employees and risk averse shareholders (Chaplinsky 2010).
Companies seeking debt financing through the issuance of bonds also need to engage an
underwriting firm and follow a set of prescribed steps. There are several types of bonds:
o corporate bonds,
o (b) mortgage bonds,
o (c) convertible bonds (convertible to stocks at a fixed price by a given date), and
o (d) debentures (unsecured bonds).
The length of debts may be short term (less than one year’s duration), intermediate (one
to seven years), or long term (more than seven years). There is also an underwriting fee
associated with this type of public offering.
The cost of debt capital includes the underwriting fee, bond rate, or interest rate to be paid in
future periods, the opportunity cost associated with the diminished company growth
opportunity, and other costs.
The opportunity cost related to reduced growth opportunity results from the fact that highly
leveraged companies can no longer be as aggressive in pursuing new growth business
opportunities as they might be in the case of no or minimum leverage. The obligatory interest
burdens tend to temper the
company’s otherwise bold
investment strategies. These
burdens also constrain the
company’s investment flexibility
and thus cause the company to
lose the potential benefits that
it could otherwise have
realized from such new
opportunities.
The other costs could result
from one or more of the
following:
o (1) suboptimal
forecasts;
o (2) vulnerability of the company to attacks by competitors;
o (3) the company’s inability to access additional debt capital, if needed; and
o (4) the cost of bankruptcy
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
Example 7.5
Innovative Products is a company that has enjoyed a high growth rate in recent years. Its growth
has been largely financed by the retained earnings that belong to the common stockholders (see
Table 7.10).
For the last three years, the company has earned an average annual net income of $75,000, after
having paid an annual interest of $8,000 and the annual taxes of $50,000. The company’s tax rate is 40%.
Company management is considering the strategy of raising $750,000 to double its production
volume. Of this amount, $500,000 would be used to (1) build an addition to the current office building,
(2) purchase new IT equipment, and (3) install an advanced Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP)
software system. The remaining amount would be needed for working capital to add inventories and to
enhance marketing and selling activities.
Market research suggests that, despite a doubling of the company’s sales volume, the product price
can be kept at the current level. The EBIT is projected to be $275,000. Two specific financing options are
to be evaluated closely:
1. Sell enough additional stock at $30 per share to raise $750,000.
2. Sell 20-year bonds at 5% interest, totaling $500,000.
Determine which financing option is to be favored from the standpoint of earning per share.
Answer 7.5
Earnings per share is defined as the company’s net income divided by the number of outstanding
common stocks. To compare the earning per share data for these two financing options, the income
statement must be constructed as in Table 7.11. The following explanations may be helpful:
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
In general, an increase in leverage (e.g., adding more debts) reduces the firm’s WACC. This is due to the
tax deductibility of interest payments associated with the debt. For many companies, WACC is typically
in the range of 8%–16%.
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report
VILLAFRANCA, Argie Mae, B.
BSCE 3B
ES 33 – Engineering Management
CO2_Written Report