George Massey argues that migration theories are missing key elements by not considering the self-interested actions of politicians and other stakeholders who construct immigration crises for political and economic gain. Specifically, Massey cites the "Latino Threat Narrative" promoted since the 1980s and examples like Donald Trump hiring undocumented Polish workers in inhumane conditions while campaigning against unauthorized immigration. Massey concludes that addressing the constructed nature of certain immigration issues could lead to more effective policies that benefit both countries by allowing circular migration patterns to continue.
George Massey argues that migration theories are missing key elements by not considering the self-interested actions of politicians and other stakeholders who construct immigration crises for political and economic gain. Specifically, Massey cites the "Latino Threat Narrative" promoted since the 1980s and examples like Donald Trump hiring undocumented Polish workers in inhumane conditions while campaigning against unauthorized immigration. Massey concludes that addressing the constructed nature of certain immigration issues could lead to more effective policies that benefit both countries by allowing circular migration patterns to continue.
George Massey argues that migration theories are missing key elements by not considering the self-interested actions of politicians and other stakeholders who construct immigration crises for political and economic gain. Specifically, Massey cites the "Latino Threat Narrative" promoted since the 1980s and examples like Donald Trump hiring undocumented Polish workers in inhumane conditions while campaigning against unauthorized immigration. Massey concludes that addressing the constructed nature of certain immigration issues could lead to more effective policies that benefit both countries by allowing circular migration patterns to continue.
George Massey argues that migration theories are missing key elements by not considering the self-interested actions of politicians and other stakeholders who construct immigration crises for political and economic gain. Specifically, Massey cites the "Latino Threat Narrative" promoted since the 1980s and examples like Donald Trump hiring undocumented Polish workers in inhumane conditions while campaigning against unauthorized immigration. Massey concludes that addressing the constructed nature of certain immigration issues could lead to more effective policies that benefit both countries by allowing circular migration patterns to continue.
The objective of today´s class: To do an overview George Massey´s article A Missing Element in Migration Theories (2015). As such, we will: 1. Talk in detail about what Massey says is missing in studying migration theories: paying theoretical attention to the self-interested actions of politicians and different stakeholders who benefit from the social construction of certain migration/immigration crises that don´t really exist – what is often referred to as the “Latino Threat Narrative (LTN)”. 2. We will then watch two videos: these are a very good examples of what Massey is arguing: that certain issues are being taken out of context for the sake of profits, audience, and building a certain political agenda. 3. We will then talk about Donald Trump and the Polish Brigade. 4. Conclusions. What does George Massey say is missing in migration theories/in studying migration? Main points: 1. He says that migration (and referring mostly to Mexico-US migration) was well theorized all the way up to 1986. He says migration theories were very useful to understand the transnational movement of people. 2. However, he says that after 1986, migration became very difficult to explain/study since migrants were not only concentrated in certain areas of the U.S anymore, but all around the country. Migration was not circular anymore. 3. Migration also became difficult to study because certain anti-migrant stakeholders had started to create migration crises. 4. As such, Massey´s argument is that it is very important to pay more theoretical attention to the self-interested actions of politicians and different actors who benefit from the social construction of certain migration/immigration crises. 5. Once all this is legitimately understood as a reality, we can begin to seek the right answers to better address the opportunities and challenges brought forward by the migration phenomenon. This leads us to talk about the “Latino Threat Narrative (LTN)”: 1. What is the ”Latino Threat Narrative (LTN)”? 2. Who was the most prominent politician to contribute to the LTN? 3. Massey argues that the LTN was not based on any substantive understanding/evidence of the legitimate realities of undocumented migration. More on the LTN 1. Massey says that, despite the existence of the LTN, there are some, but no profound consequences for Mexico-US migration. In other words, that even with the LTN, Mexican Migration to the U.S. continues to be strong. 2. As such, he says that this shows that the U.S. created its own migration crisis; that their own policies have forced people to stay instead o allowing them to continue being circular migrants. 3. However, he does not really talk about other consequences. Does anybody recognize these men? How about this man? Geraldo Rivera and Bill O´Reilly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhwwbNA3hj g Glenn Beck: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0j2c3WtB1 4 Does anyone recognize this building? Norwegian Embassy The Polish Brigade issue What was the Polish Brigade? 1. It is the name that was given to 200 undocumented Polish workers who were hired by Trump in the 1980s to demolish the Bonwit Teller building to make way for Trump Tower. 2. The Polish Brigade worked in deplorable conditions: they had no hard hats, no face masks, many of them died of asbestos. This are just a few of many things that happened. Is the Polish Brigade a relevant example to what Massey said? 1. Massey said that we need greater theoretical attention to the self-interested actions of people who benefit from the construction and immigration crises when none really exist, right? 2. Does the Polish Brigade issue qualify? Conclusions on Massey´s A Missing Element in Migration Theories: 1. He hints that the lack of attention to the actions of those who benefit from constructing immigration crises is what has led the U.S. to expand its immigration enforcement system. 2. This in turn, has created a multitude of jobs that have increased the profits of firms such as the Corrections Corporation of America and the Geo Group, which built and operate immigration detention facilities. 3. Massey says that this is what has led migrants to settle in the U.S instead of having them go back and forth (circular migration). In many ways, the expansion of the immigration enforcement system is the reason why there are so many undocumented people living in the U.S. 4. But we have to acknowledge that there is indeed a migration crisis. It would be unwise and naïve to think that there is not. However, current approaches to deal with undocumented migration need further work.