Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shailey - Radic - Type Dynamics Indicator - Type at Work Report
Shailey - Radic - Type Dynamics Indicator - Type at Work Report
Shailey Radic
7th April 2020
When you answered the questionnaire you were asked to indicate your preferences
regarding a number of different pairs of words or phrases. From analysing your
responses, certain themes can be identified. These themes can be used to suggest
the style and approach that you are likely to find most comfortable - something that
others may recognise as your ‘personality’.
Your personality, together with your values and your motivation, are core
components of your identity. Identity is something that continues to evolve
throughout our lives, but taking stock of who we think we are can be really useful
in helping us to recognise what we do and what we want to do – and to take
responsibility for our own future.
When read
ing your re
mind that: sults, do be
ar in
What follows in this report is a description Your Results
of your preferences. Remember though The style which is suggested These are o
nly suggest
that your preferences alone do not fully by your pattern of responses to what you se ions and on
em most co ly define
define you; nor do they limit you. We are all the questionnaire is described in necessarily mfortable w
what you a ith - not
complex and adaptable beings who respond the following pages. Remember re good at.
Everyone ca
to situations in a variety of ways which are that the name assigned to this n adapt his
different circ /her style to
not always defined by our personality. A style is just a label to help you umstances fit
people find - although so
knowledge of your ‘personality’ therefore to remember this complex set it easier to a me
dapt than o
can only suggest ways in which you might of preferences. Such a label Sometimes th e rs.
your answe
prefer to behave in a given situation. It does sometimes suggests things that clear-cut pa rs do not give
ttern and so a
not determine what you actually do. were not intended so please suggestion the ideas a
s below ma nd
remember that it is not a definition closely - so y not always
feel free to fit
and it does not encapsulate the and to quest id entify those
ion those th that fit
complexity of your personality. at don’t.
If you find yo
urself quest
accuracy o ioning the
In this report you will see some f the report,
suggestion before reject
ideas and suggestions about s it can be u ing the
that they are seful to ima
the implications of your set of true for som gine
Ask yourse e part of yo
preferences. lf where (sp ur life.
when (perh ecific situatio
aps when yo n s) or
they might u were you
be true - su n g er)
generally m ch an appro
ore useful. ach is
People with this style are seen as enthusiastic change Catalysts are likely to:
• Seek interaction, discuss with enthusiasm and
agents. They are always on the lookout for new angles and liven up proceedings
different ways of doing things. Often pioneers and promoters • Take initiatives and circumvent obstacles
• Value flexibility - which can make them
of the new, Catalysts thrive in environments where they can exciting if somewhat chaotic
actively debate, innovate and move things along. • Embrace change, explore options, be
experimental and take risks
• Question and probe until they have clarity -
They can be at their best when working with others. They like establishing key principles or unifying theories
to inject energy, fun and spontaneity. To them conversation
is stimulation and they are on the lookout for opportunities to Catalysts may need to:
discuss - which can sometimes confuse people because they • Learn to focus on the here and now -
sometimes controlling the temptation to jump
can switch from highly serious to seeing a debate as a bit of into the wonderful world of what the future
a game. They can be bold, even brash, sharp and often witty, could bring
• Discipline themselves to finish things before
original and argumentative and they like having the last word. moving on to something new
• Try asking for help a little more often - before
the crisis point is reached
• Learn to discuss and criticise a little more
sensitively
• Give more praise for what has been achieved
rather than always raising the bar and
working on the next challenge
The next few pages will now provide you with some
food for thought - they give suggestions and possible
implications of what your reported preferences could
mean.
This can help you to think about how you manage
work, home, your leisure and your relationships.
On the previous page, you read a As you read the report, make a note
pen-portrait of your preferred style. The of what you agree with and what you
remaining sections of this report describe disagree with. Where you disagree it
the meaning and implications of this style may be because your answers were not
in detail. They begin with a graphical reflecting your real style and motivation
representation of your profile and then or it may be that the report has over-
further detail is provided under the generalised from what is true of most
following headings: people but which does not actually
apply to you. You can use the ‘Summary
• Your profile Descriptions of the 16 Types’ and the
• Why do you work? ‘Reflections and Learning’ sections at the
• What kind of work do you want? end of the report to consider alternatives
• What is your style of working? that may fit you better. Remember that the
• Who do you want to work with? report is to stimulate your thinking rather
• How might others see you? than to limit your choices.
• Your main assets
• Areas to consider developing
• Exploring your profile
• Summary descriptions of the
16 types
• Reflections and learning from
this report
The diagram shows the four pairs of preference which are investigated by the Type
Dynamics Indicator. These preference pairs are:
Judging - Perception (J vs P) . . . . . . . . which is about how you like to live your life
For each of the above pairs, you will probably prefer one side to the other. For example, if
the diagram above shows that the bar for Introversion is longer than the bar for Extraversion,
that would mean that you prefer to get your energy more from your own thoughts and ideas
rather than from people and things and the world around you. If the bar for Extraversion is
longer than the bar for Introversion, then the opposite would apply.
We can also look at the size of the differences between your preferences for each pair. For
some of the pairs, the difference might be very slight - in other cases, it might be much
larger. The diagram below shows your results in terms of how clear the differences were for
each pair.
PREFERENCE
If you have a very clear preference for any one of the above pairs, then you are likely to use
your preferred style in the majority of circumstances. Though there are some people who
show a very clear preference but who can also use the opposing style where circumstances
require and so are still able to be flexible in how they approach particular situations.
If you have either no preference or just a very slight preference, this could mean that you use
both styles in your everyday life, perhaps switching from one to the other by consciously
adapting to circumstances. On the other hand, it could also indicate that you are unclear
about which alternative you prefer. What may seem to others like flexibility could instead be
your attempt to adapt to different circumstances, perhaps without sufficient regard for your
own preferences. We refer to this as a 'corridor' preference. For example, imagine a room on
one side of the corridor for people who have extraverted preferences and a room on the
other side of the corridor for people with introverted preferences. Someone with just a slight
preference may linger in the corridor, occasionally opening each door and sometimes
stepping inside but never feeling committed to going fully inside and relaxing there.
On the following page, you can read a summary of 'clear' and 'corridor' preferences.
When your results are clear When your results are less clear (or 'corridor')
This suggests that you have very little uncertainty This suggests that you recognise both preferences
about your own preference. This makes it more in yourself. This can make you flexible in the way
likely that this preference will be obvious and you approach life and can help you appreciate other
recognised in the way you approach life. Such people with different styles. Alternatively it could
clarity can sometimes be helpful and distinctive but mean that you are uncertain and this could make
sometimes it can come across as a little rigid and you waver between the two depending on
unappreciative of the other preference (both in circumstances or mood. If such wavering creates
yourself and in your attitude to others). N.B. Being tension for you, it can be useful to try to clarify which
clear about a preference is a different question to of the two preferences is more fundamental for you.
that of how strong or weak the preference is.
Each of us is constantly developing and updating how we think about ourselves and it is
important therefore to realise that your profile of preferences, as depicted in the diagrams on
the previous pages, represents the way you answered the questions at the time - and this, in
turn, reflects how you are (or were) when you answered the questionnaire.
It is possible for your profile to change as you develop your ideas about what is most
important, natural and rewarding for you. Not only the direction of your preferences may
change over time but also the clarity of those preferences. Some preferences which are only
slight may become stronger over time and others which are currently strong may become
less clear. Please bear this in mind as you read the more detailed implications of your
preferences in the next few pages.
Catalysts must have excitement and variety. They need a constant series of new challenges
and they have an intense fear of being bored. Catalysts will thrive if their work allows them to
explore concepts and ideas - especially when they can bounce those ideas off other people.
Catalysts can be quite pragmatic when choosing a job, not necessarily seeking deeper
meaning and purpose, but clearly seeking some kind of challenge. This will often involve
challenging the established order. Sometimes this is their way of getting change and variety
but sometimes it is because they hate inequality and injustice. They will then seek change
through uncovering hypocrisy, exposing the system and suggesting alternatives. However, a
Catalyst's need for continuous change and new challenges means that they often change
jobs - or roles - and may not always see things they have started, through to fruition.
In summary:
Catalysts need to work with stimulating and self-confident people in an equal, unstuffy
atmosphere. They emphasise fun and irreverence and do not want an atmosphere where
people take themselves too seriously. They like to challenge vigorously and without reserve
and they like targets and competition where they can push hard - and they want others to
push back. They need to constantly develop their competence and are always measuring
themselves against their own standards (and their high standards can mean that they often
feel that they are failing). They do not need others to criticise them - they do it to themselves
all the time! They need a fast-paced environment and so more traditional roles which involve
long training, slow pace and reliance on tradition do not suit their analytical, critical,
free-ranging way of thinking. They like to work with equals and are sometimes uneasy with
superior/subordinate relationships and traditional hierarchies.
In summary:
• Allow freedom to do their own thing at their own pace - which can be fast
• Be free, flexible and not 'stuffy'
Catalysts are more likely to be found in roles which require conceptual or strategic
contributions rather than in a hands-on craft role. Their constant need for challenge,
innovation and scope to try things out, means that they do not fit well in a strict, hierarchical
environment where orders must be followed and tradition respected. If they do find
themselves in such a world, they will often find their way to a position where they can stand
outside the hierarchy and exert influence without authority (or responsibility) - in short, act as
a catalyst for change! They do not seek responsibility as such because it cramps their style
and takes away that independence of thought and action which is so near to their hearts.
Their belief in rational intelligence means that they often enjoy technical or knowledge-based
work - engineering, computing, design. They seek out intellectual pursuits and debates and
are great acquirers of qualifications and degrees - not for use, but for the joy and thrill of
learning. They are unlikely to stay as specialists throughout their career - the unknown is
always more interesting than the known!
In summary:
• A fast pace and conceptual rather than slow, careful and detailed
• Activity and variety rather than specialisation and reflection
• 'Consulting' - enabling the bypassing of existing structure and hierarchy
• Engaging with others rather than solitude
• Need a sense of excitement rather than safety and routine
• Develop rather than implement.
Types of contribution
Catalysts are often free-thinking change agents but they dislike exercising 'position power.'
They like to make things happen by facilitating and enabling rather than directing and
ordering. If they are working within a large organisation they try to adopt a role as a kind of
'licensed outsider' or 'internal consultant' - for example, in HR, change management,
continuous improvement or organisation development. This can combine their need for
independence with their need to control their expansive, flexible and sometimes chaotic
style. Whilst they often contribute by shaking up the status quo and injecting energy and
enthusiasm, they can also be very practical people. If this is not evident at work, it is often
found in some other part of their life such as in their hobbies and leisure pursuits. Sometimes
they take up unusual or uncharacteristic hobbies as yet another challenge, taken up
precisely because it does not come easily! Catalysts usually contribute something new - they
investigate beyond the obvious and bring some 'other' idea, information or evidence which
they enjoy 'throwing into the pot'.
Catalysts need to manage their own time which they regard as elastic and 'discontinuous'.
This means that they tend to work in bursts of intense, focussed activity. This can get a
tremendous amount done or it can dissipate in a flurry of activity. However, structures and
schedules do not take account of their best working style. When they talk about forward
planning, they only mean this in a very loose sense and do not feel bound to follow any plan
too closely. For them a plan is only a map which means it is for guidance only - it is certainly
not the territory! They tend to be very speedy and impatient, with a great ability to see where
other people's arguments are leading - but a difficulty in waiting until the others get there!
In summary:
Getting results
Catalysts get results through their enthusiasm, speed and activity rather than by careful
preparation and planning. They have little need for structures and procedures, which they
see as getting in the way. They decide on what they want and then find a way to get there -
which can be flexible, expedient and unorthodox. This means that they sometimes get results
beyond the dreams of their more orthodox or pedestrian colleagues. This style does not
always work - especially when they need to co-ordinate with others - because their flexibility
can confuse others and earn them the reputation of being untidy, disorganised and
unprepared. However, their energetic, confident and optimistic approach to the unexpected
means that they are often better off without their plans and notes than with them.
Nevertheless, Catalysts can be extremely goal focussed and they enjoy success and the
rewards of success. Whilst not particularly materialistic, they are not embarrassed about
getting rich and succeeding. Business success and making money can be their proof that
they are competent rather than an end in itself.
In summary:
Managing change
Catalysts are the archetypal change agents - they seek novelty, enthuse about new ideas
and are always willing to experiment. "If it works don't fix it" was never their motto - they have
been known to throw out tried-and-tested methods simply for the excitement of trying
something different. This makes them either inspirational or creators of chaos!
In summary:
Catalysts are outgoing, personable and thrive on having a wide circle of friends and
acquaintances. They appear confident and optimistic, with an infectious readiness to talk and
joke and a great appetite for fun. They are also intensely interested in new ideas, which they
feed by talking, discussing and arguing. If they don't find new people to stimulate them they
can get very disgruntled and bored. They are natural networkers and seek out interest
groups and societies, always ready to get together and explore a new idea or innovative
method.
In summary:
Relationship style
A Catalyst's sociable and talkative style can make them great fun to be with. They are great
talkers and their need to talk and joke can liven up many situations. However, this style is not
In summary:
By definition, Catalysts are seldom 'Leaders' in the grand manner - they are more likely to be
on the sidelines looking to debunk the Great Leader. But they are highly influential as change
agents and innovators, and looked up to because of their flair, confidence and optimism. If
they do lead, their style is personal, equal and entrepreneurial: "We're all on a great
adventure and I know we'll get there somehow!" When they are in leadership positions their
outgoing style means that they are generally comfortable being visible and in the limelight
and they can be excellent at making presentations and attending public gatherings.
In summary:
As a manager
Catalysts lead by example rather than by exercising tight control or giving orders. They will
enthuse, join in and expect everyone to contribute and pull their weight. This approach
requires a team of confident equals. Catalysts are not happy when they have to adapt this
style - especially if they have to exercise authority and implement policies that they didn't
devise themselves. Situations which require a more systematic process and structure, or
where people need a great deal of patient support and guidance, can get them frustrated and
In summary:
As a decision-maker
Catalysts don't particularly welcome making decisions - they would rather keep their options
open - but if they have to, they can decide quickly and firmly and without unnecessary
regrets. The arguments that weigh heaviest with them are ones which paint what is possible
rather than what is practical. They focus on the future and are not much influenced by
precedent, factual arguments or existing limitations. These merely act as obstacles to be
leapt over or got around.
In summary:
In resolving conflict
Catalysts see conflict as a form of negotiation - a cool battle of wills where winners and
losers can respect each other - rather than as a bloody battlefield with terrible consequences.
In those terms they are great negotiators, flexible, adaptable, resourceful, but if necessary
prepared to take tough decisions; as such they are very good people to have on hand when
there are choppy waters to navigate or ambiguities to handle. However, their guiding
principle will be for equality and autonomy. They will not take the easy path of compromise if
they see injustice and they can campaign vigorously for equality and fairness. They may
need to learn that some conflicts should be resolved and buried - to be willing to lose the
battle in order to win the war.
In summary:
Catalysts are fast-moving, responsive, energetic, and optimistic able to handle many things
at once, to cut out the inessentials, to throw away the schedule - and the rulebook - and to
get things done in innovative ways. The things they bring are:
In summary:
A Catalyst's charm, persuasiveness and self-belief lead them to rely too much on winging it,
with the result that they fall flat on their face. The things to consider are:
In summary:
Your profile shows the set of preferences that you have developed and
which you are currently expressing.
It sometimes helps to ask why we have developed particular
preferences. Do they reflect values we have absorbed from our
experiences or from others around us? Do they result from some sort of
pressure we may have experienced in the past? Do they reflect how we
really want to be or do we perhaps sometimes wish we were different?
To help you understand more, try to answer the questions in each of the 6
boxes below.
We can think of a person’s preferences, as shown by How we are is not always how we want to be. What
their profile, as their ‘comfort zone’. In your case: changes in your preferences would be needed to
make your profile:
1. is this comfort zone a positive choice?
2. is this comfort zone a way of avoiding something 1. represent your ‘ideal’ of the person you want to be?
less comfortable? 2. reflect the potential you feel is within you?
3. reflect the person you would like to see described in
your epitaph?
Our preferences often change as we grow Sometimes, the person we say we would prefer to
and develop. How different would you say the be is based on the expectations of others. Thinking
preferences you now have are to those you had: in terms of the four preference pairs (or using the 16
summary profiles on the next page), consider how the
1. when you were growing up at home?
following might like you to be:
2. when you were at school?
3. in your early adulthood? 1. your parents?
2. your teachers?
3. other people who are significant in your life
Our preferences sometimes change according to There are always parts of ourselves that remain
where we are and what we are doing. Think about relatively hidden or unexpressed. Thinking in
how your preferences might be different: terms of the four preference pairs (or using the 16
summary profiles on the next page), do you think
1. at work
there are elements in your profile which might:
2. at home
3. in your hobbies or leisure activities 1. be under-used or not be expressed?
2. become exaggerated when you are under pressure?
The answers above will help you think more about where your reported preferences are coming from.
The ideas in this report are based on your answers to The theory of ‘Psychological Type’ tells us
that there are elements of all types within
the questionnaire. As you reflect more about who you each of us, but in different proportions.
are and how you behave, you may find that your ideas It can therefore be useful to think about
each of the other types and to see if you
become clearer or change. recognise some of them as part of you
- at least, perhaps for some of the time.
Pen-portraits of each of the 16 Types
are shown in the table below for you to
consider.
1. On reflection, the preferences that feel more ‘core’ to who I am are: (circle one of the preferences in each pair)
Use the table on the previous page and write down the name which is
given to the combination of preferences you have indicated above:
2. If your are finding it hard to identify what is core, please instead list below those pen-portraits from the previous page that you most easily
identify with. For each pen-portrait you mention, give an example of the sort of situation in which you feel it comes to the fore and in which it
would be an appropriate description of your preferences
Feedback questionnaire