UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
FACULTY OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCES
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

COURSE SYLLABUS: BASICS PENOLOGY

Instructure(s) : 1)
2)
Credits : 3 credits
Meeting Times : 16 times

Course Description :

Penology is a course to foster students’ ability to analyze perspectives, theories, and forms of
legal punishment to contemporary developments, including in Indonesia. The lecture was delivered
with student-centered methods using Small Group Discussion and Question-Based Learning. The
course material consists of politics, theories, and forms of punishment. The language used in the
learning process is Indonesian.

OUTLINE

Learning
Week Topics Reference
Method
Limitation to Penology Honderich, Ted. (2006.) Punishment: the supposed
Scope of Penology justifications revisited (p. 4). London: Pluto Press.
Relations between Newburn, Tim. (2007). Criminology (p. 514). Devon:
Penology and Willan Publishing.
Criminology
Limitation of Politics of Sutherland, Edwin. (1992). Principles of Criminology
Punishment (p. 302). New York: General Hill.
Lecture and
1 Miethe, Terance D. & Hong Lu. (2005). Punishment: a Discussion
comparative historical perspective (p. 194). Cambridge
University Press.
Punishment and the Role
of the State McBride, Keally. (2010). Punishment and Political
Order (p. 103). The University of Michigan Press.

Zaibert, Leo. (2006). Punishment and Retribution (p.

7). Ashgate
 Backward Looking
Theory Individual/Group
Utilitarian Prevention Honderich, Ted. (2006). Punishment: the supposed Presentation,
2
Theory justifications revisited (p. 17). London: Pluto Press. Discussion, and
Rehabilitation and Lecture
Reformation Theory
Individual/Group
Punishment and the Role Presentation,
3
of the State Discussion, and
Lecture
Corporal Punishment
Capital Punishment
(Death Penalty) Individual/Group
Punishment by Physical Adams, Robert. (1998). The Abuse of Punishment (pp. Presentation,
4 118; 149; 77; 99). London: Macmillan Press.
Constraints and Discussion, and
Punishment by Custody Lecture
The Development of
Correctional System
Moral Responsibility Montague, Philip. 1995. Punishment as Societal-
Proportionality Principle Defense (pp. 79; 109). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield
in Punishment Publishers. Individual/Group
Presentation,
5 Honderich, Ted. (2006). Punishment: the supposed
Discussion, and
justifications revisited (p. 58). London: Pluto Press.
Utilitarianism Lecture
Grupp, Stanley E (ed). (1971). Theories of Punishment.
Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.
Honderich, Ted. (2006). Punishment: the supposed
justifications revisited (pp. 195; 112). London: Pluto
Humanitarianism Press.

Individual/Group
Bagaric, Mirko. (2001). Punishment and Sentencing: a
Presentation,
6 Disciplinary mechanism rational approach (p. 127). London: Cavendish
Discussion, and
Publishing Limited.
Lecture
Howe, Adrian. 1994. Punish and Critique: toward a
Panopticon feminist analysis of penality (p. 67). London and New
York: Routledge.
The Linkages between Grupp, Stanley E (ed). (1971). Theories of Punishment.
Retaliation, Moral Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.
Responsibility, and
Individual/Group
Proportionality to the Montague, Philip. (1995). Punishment as Societal-
Presentation,
7 Retributive Theory Defense (pp. 79; 109). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers. Discussion, and
The Linkages between
Lecture
Utilitarianism and
Honderich, Ted. (2006). Punishment: the supposed
Humanitarianism to
justifications revisited (p. 58). London: Pluto Press.
Deterrence Theory
8 Midterm Exam
 The Linkages between Honderich, Ted. (2006). Punishment: the supposed
Utilitarianism and justifications revisited (pp. 195; 112). London: Pluto
Press.
Humanitarianism to
Rehabilitation and Individual/Group
Bagaric, Mirko. (2001). Punishment and Sentencing: a
Reformation Theory Presentation,
9 rational approach (p. 127). London: Cavendish
The Linkages between Discussion, and
Publishing Limited.
Disciplinary and Lecture
Panopticon to Howe, Adrian. 1994. Punish and Critique: toward a
Reformation Theory and feminist analysis of penality (p. 67). London and New
Imprisonment York: Routledge.
Punishment Practices in Miethe, Terance D. & Hong Lu. (2005). Punishment: Individual/Group
10 United States of a comparative historical perspective (p. 82). Presentation,
Cambridge University Press. Discussion, and
Amerika Lecture
Miethe, Terance D. & Hong Lu. (2005). Punishment: a Individual/Group
Punishment Practices in Presentation,
11 comparative historical perspective (p. 115). Cambridge
China Discussion, and
University Press.
Lecture
Miethe, Terance D. & Hong Lu. (2005). Punishment: a Individual/Group
Punishment Practices in Presentation,
12 comparative historical perspective (p. 155). Cambridge
Islamic States Discussion, and
University Press.
Lecture
Individual/Group
Punishment Practices in Dokumen Rapat Konferensi Kepenjaraan Indonesia, Presentation,
13
Indonesia Lembang, 1964. Discussion, and
Lecture
The Paradox of Howe, Adrian. 1994. Punish and Critique: toward a
Punishment by the State feminist analysis of penality (pp. 4; 135; 170). London
and New York: Routledge.

Adams, Robert. 1998. The Abuse of Punishment (p.

182). London: Macmillan Press.

Hirsch, Andrew Von, et.al. (ed). 2003. Restorative

Justice and Criminal Justice: competing or
reconcilable paradigm? (p. 1). Oxford: Hart
Publishing. Individual/Group
14 Presentation,
Feminism in the Theory Discussion, and
McConville, Sean (ed). (2003). The Use of Punishment Lecture
of Punishment (p. 199). Willan Publishing.

Bennett, Christopher. (2008). The Apology Ritual: a

philosophical theory of punishment (p. 13). Cambridge
University Press.

Arrigo, Bruce A dan Dragan Milovanovic. (2009).

Revolution in Penology: rethinking the society of
captives (pp. 3; 37). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield
Publisher
 Restorative Justice in the Howe, Adrian. 1994. Punish and Critique: toward a
Punishment Theory feminist analysis of penality (pp. 4; 135; 170). London
and New York: Routledge.

Adams, Robert. 1998. The Abuse of Punishment (p.

182). London: Macmillan Press.

Hirsch, Andrew Von, et.al. (ed). 2003. Restorative

Justice and Criminal Justice: competing or
reconcilable paradigm? (p. 1). Oxford: Hart
Publishing. Individual/Group
15 Presentation,
Peacemaking
Discussion, and
Criminology and McConville, Sean (ed). (2003). The Use of Punishment
Lecture
Constitutive Penology (p. 199). Willan Publishing.

Bennett, Christopher. (2008). The Apology Ritual: a

philosophical theory of punishment (p. 13). Cambridge
University Press.

Arrigo, Bruce A dan Dragan Milovanovic. (2009).

Revolution in Penology: rethinking the society of
captives (pp. 3; 37). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield
Publisher
16 Final Exam