PROCESS OBSERVATION TOOL

Weighted
SD D A SA TOTAL Mean Interpretation
Standards 1 2 3 4
1. Session CONTENT
▪▪ Activities
Objectiveswere
werecongruent
presented to 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
objectives
0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Substantial input was given 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Key messages were clear 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Objectives were achieved 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.9 Strongly Agree
2. Session PROCESS How was the session conducted?
▪ Methodology was appropriate for adult
learners 0 0 5 31 139 3.9 Strongly Agree
▪ Participants were engaged 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Stimulating questions were asked 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Workshop output was processed (if
any) 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 4.0 Strongly Agree
3. Session ATMOSPHERE
Informal << >> Formal
0 0 0 36 144 4.0 formal
Low energy << >> High Energy
36 144 4.0 High Energy
Hostile << >> Supportive
36 144 4.0 Supportive
Inhibited << >> Open
36 144 4.0 Open
4. PARTICIPATION of Trainees How engaged were participants in the session?

Only the
facilitator Most people
talked Few people talked talked

0 0 36 0 108 3.0 Few people talked

Group was Grouped was

apathetic << >> involved
Grouped was
0 0 0 36 144 4.0 involved

Group was Group was

divided << >> united
0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Group was united
 RANGE Interpretation
1.00-1.74 STRONGLY DISAGREE
1.75-2.49 DISAGREE

2.50-3.24 AGREE

3.25-4.00 STRONGLY AGREE

 PROGRAM EVALUATION

SD D A SA TOTAL Weighted Mean Interpretation

Standards 1 2 3 4
A. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Training program was delivered as planned 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree

Training program was managed efficiently 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree

Training Program was well-structured 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree

WEIGHTED MEAN 3.9 Strongly Agree
B. ATTAINMENT OF OBJECTIVES

Program objectives were clearly presented 0 0 5 31 139 3.9 Strongly Agree

Program objectives were attained 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.9 Strongly Agree
C. DELIVERY OF CONTENT
Program content was appropriate to
trainees' roles and responsibilities 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
Content delivered was based on
authoritative and reliable sources 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Session activities were effective in
generating learning 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree

Adult learning methodologies were used 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree

Program followed a logical order/structure 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree

Contribution of all trainees were
encouraged 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 4.0 Strongly Agree
D. PROVISION OF SUPPORT MATERIALS
Appropriate to trainees' needs 0 0 7 29 137 3.8 Strongly Agree
Adequate 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
Given on me 0 0 5 31 139 3.9 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.8 Strongly Agree
E. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM
Members were present when needed 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Members were courteous 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Members were efficient 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Members were responsive to the needs of
trainees 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 4.0 Strongly Agree
F. TRAINING VENUE
Well lighted 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Well-ventilated 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Sufficient space for program activities 0 2 5 29 135 3.8 Strongly Agree
Adequate soundproofing 0 5 5 26 129 3.6 Strongly Agree
Availability of equipment 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
Serviceability of equipment 0 0 5 31 139 3.9 Strongly Agree
Internet access was usable 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
Clean 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
Accessible comfort rooms 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
Clean comfort rooms 0 0 7 29 137 3.8 Strongly Agree
Meals were of satisfactory quality 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Meals were of sufficient quantity 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Meals were generally healthy 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
Meals had sufficient variety 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.9 Strongly Agree
G. ACCOMMODATIONS
With sufficient space 0 5 5 26 129 3.6 Strongly Agree
Comfortable 0 5 6 25 128 3.6 Strongly Agree
Clean 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
Facilities were in good working order 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.7 Strongly Agree
GENERAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE 3.9 Strongly Agree
 RANGE Interpretation
1.00-1.74 STRONGLY DISAGREE

1.75-2.49 DISAGREE

2.50-3.24 AGREE

3.25-4.00 STRONGLY AGREE

 ON-SITE MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Weighted
SD D A SA TOTAL Mean Interpretation
Standards 1 2 3 4
1. Schedule and Participant
▪ Maximum of 60 participants per
class 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Program started according to
schedule 0 0 3 33 141 3.9 Strongly Agree
▪ Program ended according to
schedule 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Attendance is systematically
monitored 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Ground rules were clear 0 0 4 32 140 3.9 Strongly Agree
▪ Compliance of ground rules was
monitored
▪ Modifications in activities and 0 0 3 33 141 3.9 Strongly Agree
schedule are consulted with the
participants 0 0 1 35 143 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Modifications in activities and
schedule are given ahead of time 0 0 3 33 141 3.9 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.9 Strongly Agree
2. Training Site /Venue
▪ Adequately lit 0 0 36 0 108 3.0 Agree
▪ Well ventilated 0 0 36 0 108 3.0 Agree
▪ Adequate soundproofing 0 0 31 5 113 3.1 Agree
▪ Comfortable temperature 0 0 36 0 108 3.0 Agree
▪ With sufficient space 0 0 36 0 108 3.0 Agree
▪ Clean 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Clean comfort rooms 0 0 36 0 108 3.0 Agree
▪ Equipment were serviceable 0 3 33 0 105 2.9 Agree
▪ Internet access was usable 0 0 36 0 108 3.0 Agree
▪ Medical care was available e.g.
common medicines, first aid 0 6 30 0 102 2.8 Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.1 Agree
3. Accommodations
▪ With sufficient space 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Clean 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Clean comfort rooms 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Facilities were in good working
order 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.9 Strongly Agree
4. Meals
▪ Good Quality 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Sufficient Quantity 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Generally Healthy 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Good Variety 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Meals served on time 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 4.0 Strongly Agree
5. Program Management Team
▪ Available when needed 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Courteous 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree
▪ Efficient 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree

▪ Responsive to needs of participants 0 0 0 36 144 4.0 Strongly Agree

WEIGHTED MEAN 4.0 Strongly Agree
6. Sessions and Trainers
▪ The trainers used approved resource
package (session guide, slide
presentation, video etc) 0 0 2 31 130 3.6 Strongly Agree
▪ Training/learning materials were
adequate 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Training/learning materials were
given on time 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Supplies were available 0 0 7 29 137 3.8 Strongly Agree
▪ Supplies were in good condition 0 0 6 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.8 Strongly Agree
7. QAME SYSTEM

▪ A quality assurance and monitoring

and evaluation system was in place 0 0 5 31 139 3.9 Strongly Agree
▪ Data gathered was used to inform
management 0 06 30 138 3.8 Strongly Agree
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.8 Strongly Agree
GENERAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE 3.8 Strongly Agree
 RANGE Interpretation
1.00-1.74 STRONGLY DISAGREE

1.75-2.49 DISAGREE

2.50-3.24 AGREE

3.25-4.00 STRONGLY AGREE

 PROGRAM EVALUATION
Weighted
Standards SD D A SA Mean
1 2 3 4
A. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Interpretation