Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FBFTL Faqs On Land Sale - 22.8.18
FBFTL Faqs On Land Sale - 22.8.18
As the matter was discussed among the Budget/Audit Team, the Trustee Board,
the Deacon body, and church leadership, we began exploring the possibilities of
selling this unneeded property and using the funds for emergency capital re-
pairs and replacement to preserve our strategic location.
This process ultimately led to an offer for the property which was presented to
the Budget/Audit Team, the Trustee Board, and the Deacon body, who unani-
mously approved presenting the offer to the congregation for approval. The
proposal to sell the unused property was presented to the congregation at the
regularly scheduled church business meeting on July 31, 2022, and the offer was
approved by the congregation unanimously.
“there have been no discussions about selling off the property.” So why did
you sell the 501 NE Second Street property?
Of course, we were speaking about the entire property in 2021, not this single
parcel. Furthermore, we did not pursue the sale of this parcel. Fort Lauderdale
has recently enjoyed a time of rapid business and population growth. At the
same time the amount of land available for development downtown is getting
smaller and smaller. Because of these things, land prices recently rose dramati-
cally. For context, a retail tire store 50 feet from our parcel sold in October 2021
for $7.7 million and then sold just seven months later for $20 million.
In the context of that real estate boom, we received multiple unsolicited offers
for 501 NE Second Street. We cannot contractually disclose the price of the sale,
but it was considerably higher than the appraised value. We were advised by
outside counsel that the Board of Trustees had a fiduciary responsibility to seri-
ously consider this offer. The church did, and that’s what prompted the sale of
the property. Also, the timing seems to have been good as we did have a con-
cern about missing out on an assemblage opportunity.
5. Is it true that the congregation voted unanimously to sell the 501 NE Sec-
ond Street property?
Yes. In fact, Dr. Barry McCarty, the SBC Parliamentarian for over 35 years who
has been assisting us with joint governance meetings and church business meet-
ings since 2020, commented that he never thought he’d see the day when our
church voted unanimously on anything.
Here are some additional facts to correct some of the misinformation shared on
social media:
• The vote took place at the July 31, 2022 regularly scheduled congrega-
tional business meeting. It was not a specially called meeting.
• As specified by the Bylaws, there was a quorum of over 100 members at
the business meeting. The church has the sign-in sheet listing those in at-
tendance.
• The church secretary was duly elected as Church Clerk and Secretary of
the corporation at the church’s 8/29/21 business meeting.
10.Did any realtor in church leadership/who is part of the church make any
money of any kind on the sale of the property?
No. We are grateful to have been able to facilitate the transaction between the
church and the seller’s legal advisors so that no realty commission is involved in
the transaction. This means even more resources will go to supporting our minis-
try.
11.Is it a conflict of interest for Romney Rogers, a deacon, to also be the legal
representative for this sale?
No, it is not. Rogers, along with all members of governance teams and executive
leadership of the church, annually reviews the church’s Conflict of Interest policy
with oversight by our auditors and Evangelical Council for Financial Accountabil-
ity (ECFA). Rogers appropriately disclosed the potential or perceived conflict of
interest with him being our legal counsel. The Board of Trustees deemed there
to be no conflict of interest in this case, and Rogers’ law firm did NOT charge
any legal fees to the church for this transaction.
The entire church voted unanimously and with optimism for the sale of the prop-
erty.
16.Didn’t the church lose a legal battle with these former members?
No. A Broward County Court Judge issued a decision on May 19, 2022, direct-
ing arbitration on a very narrow set of issues between the church and those ex-
members in opposition to the church’s decisions.
The plaintiffs had argued for arbitration on a much larger set of issues. Because
the judge rejected this, we have filed our response to the demand for arbitration
with the Institute for Christian Conciliation (ICC) and are awaiting their reply and
the next steps.
We are in full compliance with the court order, and the next step is to start the
process of arbitration on the narrow set of disagreements.
17.Did the church have to sell 501 NE Second Street to make up for the income
lost from the Christmas pageant?
Absolutely not. The Christmas pageant was offered as our gift to the people of
Fort Lauderdale—not as a moneymaking venture. On the contrary, it became a
large financial burden to the ministry in its later, declining years.