Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment 2 r5
Assignment 2 r5
Read the text below about the future of corporate philanthropy. Choose the best sentence from the list to fill each
of the gaps and mark a letter A–H. Do not use any letter more than once. There is an example at the beginning, (0).
The future of corporate philanthropy
Some of the biggest and most powerful companies in the world today are becoming almost as well known for their
high-profile corporate social responsibility initiatives as for their products and services. Some are cynical about the
motivations for this. (0) E He maintains that corporate social philanthropic activities have become ‘heavily promoted
story tools that present a deliberately over-inflated image of corporate citizenship’. What is more worrying still is
that all this activity has effectively served as a smokescreen to hide a significant fall-off in corporate charitable
contributions worldwide. (1) Business charitable deductions now only average about 0.7% of pre-tax earnings.
As ‘real’ contributions to charitable causes diminish, Hindery laments the fact that so many
CEOs have failed to understand the fact that an effectively managed contribution programme can deliver strong
returns to a corporation. He maintains that if company donations are directed to non-profit groups closely aligned
with the interests of the corporation’s business objectives and the community context in which it operates, they can
become a powerful business tool. (2) Examples of this kind of ‘strategic’ corporate philanthropy would include, for
example, financial literacy programmes supported by financial institutions, or health and wellness programmes
funded by pharmaceutical companies. (3) Moreover, the kind of multiple-stakeholder participation such initiatives
require and generate can become a powerful social force and an agent for positive change.
(4) Contributions that are purely selfish in their intent, for example, that are designed only to bolster the bottom
line, or to support pet projects of senior managers or board members, do not, again according to Hindery, ‘satisfy the
requirements of good corporate citizenship’. (5) In other words, when a business gets too ‘strategic’ in its giving, this
will often result in it cutting its overall contribution rather than, for example, deciding to focus on one or two strategic
causes.
Then there are those who would advocate the abolition of corporate philanthropy altogether. (6) They would argue
that because corporations are constantly pushing against the limits imposed by society in pursuit of profits they will
never make good citizens and should not be treated as citizens. (7) Given the bottom-line driven world we live in, it
seems unlikely that the current state of corporate giving is unlikely to change any time soon.
A Without any additional promotional effort by the company concerned, such programmes often end up elevating
awareness of the brand to the same degree as for the cause.
B There is also the danger that strategic philanthropy is actually at the root of the downward trend in contributions
to charity.
C Of course, for acts of corporate philanthropy to become solely about advancing the interests of the company, would
be a contradiction in terms.
D They should not be regulated or boycotted into doing the right thing.
E Leo Hindery Jr, Chairman of the Smart Globalization Initiative at the New America Foundation believes that,
increasingly, companies exploit their corporate social responsibility initiatives for promotional purposes.
F Whereas 25 years ago, businesses allocated on average 2% of their pre-tax profits in gifts and grants, today
companies are only one third as generous.
G In such cases a donation of, for example, 1% of pre-tax earnings, begin, as Hindery says, to ‘take on the look and
feel of an investment, not a handout’.
H They include, for example, the acolytes of Friedman who continue to believe that a company should only be
responsible to its shareholders.