CONCLUSION [3] Wriggers, P. (1995) .Finite Element Algorithms for
Contact Problems. Archives of Computational In this paper, three-dimensional-finite element analysis of gas Methods in Engineering, Vol. 2(4), 1-49. turbine foundation with and without considering the effect of soil structure interaction under harmonic excitation have been [4] Karthigeyan, V., Prakhya, G. K. V., and Vekaria, K. carried out with different operating frequencies. furthermore, (2001). Dynamic analysis of a steam turbine support the free vibration analysis was performed to determine the structure. In Proceedings of the eighth international fundamental natural frequency and the mode shapes of the conference on the application of artificial intelligence foundation. Important conclusions drawn from this study as to civil and structural engineering computing, pp. following: 299-300. Civil-Comp. 1- The free vibration analysis showed symmetric mode shape [5] Bhattacharya, K., Dutta, S.C., and Dasgupta, S. about the Z-axis for the first frequency while the coupled (2004). Effect of soil flexibility on dynamic behavior bending – torsion mode shapes for the second and third of building frames on raft foundation. Journal of frequencies, therefore the torsion design should be taken Sound and Vibration, 274, pp. 111–135. into account at the design of such turbine foundation in [6] Prakash, S., and Puri, V. K. (2006). Foundations for order to prevent the differential settlement of the vibrating machines. Journal of structural foundation. Engineering, 33(1), 13-29. 2- Force vibration analysis was performed to investigate the [7] Lakshmanan, N., and Gopalakrishnan, N. (2007). response of turbine generator foundation to the dynamic New design approach for computing peak dynamic unbalanced force comes from machine to the foundation response of turbo generator pedestals using modal during the operation. synthesis. Practice Periodical on Structural Design 3- The response of the foundation and the soil due to the and Construction, 12(1), 31-37. harmonic excitation showed larger magnitude at the initial [8] Bhatia K. G. (2008). Foundations for industrial time due to coupled effect of transit and the steady state of machines and earthquake effects. ISET journal of the harmonic excitation then the response decrease with earthquake technology, vol.45, pp13-29, NO.1-2, time due to vanish of the transited component reaching a March-June. constant and this response may be de-amplified when ignoring the effect of SSI [9] P. St. Fleischer and P. G. Trombik (2008). Turbo- generator machine foundations subjected to 4- Considerable change in the amplitudes of the structural earthquake loadings.The 14th World Conference on response was indicated through the comparison between earthquake Engineering, Beijing, china, 12-17. the case of with and without considering SSI effect. [10] Magade, S. B., & Patankar, J. P. (2009). Effect of 5- The change in the maximum response to the vertical Soil Structure Interaction on the Dynamic Behavior harmonic excitation reflect the change in the applying of Buildings. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil frequency so that at middle node on the soil and also in the Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), 2278(1684), 09-14. foundation the results showed different peak values and it has maximum values at earlier applied frequencies due to a [11] Ibrahim M. Ahmed. (2011). Finite element dynamic state of coupling steady state and transit state response. study on large framed foundation of steam turbine- generator. Master thesis, The American University in 6- For the turbine machine foundations, it worthy to take the Cairo. full site effect (i.e. complete model of soil and foundation) in the dynamic analysis to get the better insight for the [12] Matinmanesh, H., and Asheghabadi, M. S. (2011). behavior of both soil and foundation through the Seismic analysis on soil-structure interaction of investigation of soil-foundation interface. buildings over sandy soil. procedia engineering, 14, 1737-1743, Islamic Azad University Iran. [13] ABAQUS Theory Manual, (2012), Dassault REFERENCES Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA. [1] Whiteman R.V and Richard (1967). Design [14] Ming F., Tao W. and Hui, L. (2012). Dynamic procedure for dynamically loaded foundation. Table behavior of turbine foundation considering full 4, pp 182-192. interaction among facility, structure and [2] Wolf, J. (1985). Dynamic soil-structure interaction soil.15WCEE, China. (No. LCH-BOOK-2008-039). Prentice Hall, Inc. [15] Jayarajan, P., & Kouzer, K. M. (2014). Dynamic Analysis of Turbo generator Machine