Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Buoi 4 - Chapter 3
Buoi 4 - Chapter 3
Buoi 4 - Chapter 3
AND CULTURES
16-2
The different facets of culture
No universal definition of culture.
Schneider and Barsoux (1997) identified 164 different
definitions made by anthropologists (nhà nhân loại học).
More relevant broad definitions of culture include ‘a shared
pattern of behaviour’ (Mead, 1953), a ‘system of shared
meaning or understanding’ (Levi-Strauss, 1971; Geertz,
1973), or ‘a set of basic assumptions, shared solutions to
universal problems … handed down from one generation
to another’ (Schein, 1985).
16-3
The different facets of culture
All these definitions have in common the concept that culture is
shared, and contain an implicit decoding of an underlying
pattern of cause and effect relationships.
According to André Laurent, there are three major layers of
culture:
1. Basic assumptions and meaning – the elements of belief that
are the least visible and probably the most entrenched (cố thủ),
since they deal with ingrained (ăn sâu vào) models of
understanding, meaning and causal relationships that have
been largely shaped by historical factors and transmitted
through the educational process to the next generation. Religious
faith and assumptions about human nature belong to this
category (e.g. ‘all men are equal’, ‘time is limited’)
16-4
The different facets of culture
2. Values, beliefs and preferences – the explicit expression of
what people consider as good or appropriate in one’s personal or
social life.
Values can be challenged and possibly changed to some extent
by new information and confrontation with new situations.
A manager whose assumption about human nature is that
people are fundamentally greedy, for example, will probably
believe that only materialistic rewards will motivate
employees.
She/he may change this belief if exposed to situations in which
people sacrifice their own financial reward for the benefit of
others.
16-5
The different facets of culture
3. Behavior – the most visible part of the iceberg.
It is in action and can be modified through education as well
as through some forms of ‘conditioning’.
Behavioral change does not necessarily indicate a genuine
modification of the beliefs or assumptions underneath it.
An autocratic (độc đoán) leader may be told to change
her/his style of leading a meeting although she/he still
believes that employees ‘have to be told’ (belief) based on the
assumption that human beings are fundamentally divided into
‘born leaders’ and ‘passive followers’. In such a case,
behavioral change is superficial (ở bề mặt).
16-6
The different facets of culture
In the management field which, by its very nature, is concerned
with the economic achievement of social groups (companies),
culture will be manifest (rõ ràng, hiển nhiên) in four key
dimensions:
National or ethnic culture: derived from the national, religious
or ethnic origin of citizens or social groups.
Corporate culture: the accumulated assumptions, values, beliefs
and behavioral norms (quy tắc, tiêu chuẩn) resulting from
History of the company (good and bad experiences)
Existing and past leadership (the legacy of charismatic (có uy
tín, có sức lôi cuốn quần chúng) CEOs)
Ownership structure (family-owned, publicly listed, private,
government-owned) and its size
16-7
The different facets of culture
Industry culture: any accepted values and codes of conduct
derived from the professional norms of a particular industry
such as heavy manufacturing, services, oil and gas and so on.
Professional culture: derived from the training and
professional norms and constraints of different corporate
functions such as accountants, researchers, production
personnel, sales and marketing people and so on.
16-8
National cultural differences
From a practical perspective, most cultural research in
management has used nations as their unit of grouping for
cultural categories.
Analysis of national cultural differences in a business
management context suggests four main streams of differences.
1. Ethnological (dân tộc học) research: ‘silent language’
differences (Hall and Reed Hall, 1990).
2. Managerial values and assumptions: work-related value
differences (Hofstede, 1980); value orientation differences
(Trompenaars, 1993; Hampden-Turner and Trompenaars, 2000);
management assumption differences (Laurent, 1986; Meyer, 2014a
and b, 2015a and b).
16-9
National cultural differences
3. Country clusters: the grouping of nations according to
similarities in cultural traits (đặc điểm) (Ronen and Shenkar,
1985; Huntington, 1997).
16-10
Ethnological research: ‘Silent language’
differences
According to Hall, cultures differ in the way they communicate
through non-verbal signs or ‘silent
language’. He identifies six silent languages.
Cultures differ according to their perception of time.
Germanic culture: time can be seen as sequential (tuần tự)
and scarce, leading to the quest for preciseness, punctuality
and deadlinekeeping.
Some cultures see time as fluid, circular and abundant, as
in Arab countries, where people will be less punctual and
not really disturbed by delays and postponements.
16-11
Ethnological research: ‘Silent language’
differences
Differences in the perception of space relate to the
concept of social distance that measures not only the
physical proximity in social interactions but also the
emotional intimacy (sự thân mật, quen thuộc).
In high-social distance cultures, people will tend to
avoid physical and emotional proximity – a typically
British trait.
In low-social distance cultures – such as the Latin
countries – people have no objection to physical
contact and the sharing of emotions.
16-12
Ethnological research: ‘Silent language’
differences
The language of material goods is linked to the
importance attached to financial wealth as a sign of
status – a materialistic trait of Americans.
Friendship is built and maintained quite differently. In
some societies, one can make friends rapidly but the
relationship may be superficial and may not last long.
The silent language of this sort of friendship may shock
people coming from societies where friendships are not
so quickly built but last longer.
16-13
Ethnological research: ‘Silent language’
differences
The silent language of agreement quite often
differentiates Western cultures from Eastern.
In Western societies, most agreements or disagreements
are explicitly stated and documented in writing.
In Eastern cultures, verbal and sometimes ambiguous
agreements are accepted.
16-14
Ethnological research: ‘Silent language’
differences
The silent language of context attaches importance to
the person rather than the content in a
communication.
In high-context societies – mostly Asian, South American
or Latin – the important part of an interaction is the
person (with whom) and the emphasis given to the
setting, the ambiance and ceremonials.
In low-context societies – Anglo-Saxon, Nordic or
Germanic – the what dominates the communication,
hence the importance attached to written documents
and technical specifications.
16-15
Differences in Managerial Values and
Assumptions
Several scholars have posited theories of
managerial cultural difference at the level of
nationalities:
Hofstede’s work-related values
16
Hofstede’s work-related values
17
Hofstede’s work-related values
18
Hofstede’s work-related values
19
Hofstede’s work-related values
20
Hofstede’s work-related values
21
Trompenaars’ value orientation
The cultural differentiation proposed by Trompenaars
(1993), also based on survey data, identifies six
value orientations that differentiate cultures and
impact on the way countries conceive organizations
(see Table 3.1).
Trompenaars found significant differences in national
groups; most Asian cultures, for
instance, differ from Western cultures in all dimensions
22
Table 3.1 Trompenaars’ six value orientations
23
Laurent’s management assumption
24
Laurent’s management assumption
25
Laurent’s management assumption
26
Laurent’s management assumption
27
Meyer’s culture map
Evaluation of people
Persuasion
Leadership
Decision making
Trust
Disagreements
Scheduling 28
Table 3.2 The eight dimensions of Meyer’s culture map
29
Table 3.2 The eight dimensions of Meyer’s culture map
30
Country Clusters
31
Country Clusters
33
Country Clusters
34
The Lewis Model
According to Richard Lewis (1996), cultures can be
classified into three groups: linear active, multi-active
and reactive (phản ứng lại).
In linear active cultures people are task-oriented, highly
organized planners.
They prefer direct discussion and use facts and figures.
They are prone to accepting compromise (sự thỏa hiệp)
to achieve results.
In this category we find German, Swiss, North American
and Scandinavian cultures
35
The Lewis Model
Multi-active cultures group people who are
loquacious (nói nhiều), emotional and relationship-
oriented.
They tend to do several things and talk at the same
time.
In this category we find Latin American, Southern
European, Western and Northern African and
Middle Eastern cultures.
36
The Lewis Model
In reactive cultures people are introvert (hướng vào nội
tâm), show respect to an interlocutor (người đối thoại)
and listen without interrupting.
In this category one will find most of the Asian cultures.
37
Economic cultures and business
systems
A business system is the way economic activities
are structured, coordinated and managed.
It is the result of the interaction between three sub-
systems: governance, culture and institutional
fabric
38
Figure 3.1 The architecture of business systems
39
Governance
Governance reflects the dominant mode of control,
interdependencies and exercise of authority in business firms. This
is made up of three components:
The ownership system: How the ownership of enterprises is
distributed between the public and private sectors (corporate,
family, associative).
The networking system: How firms collaborate and do deals
among themselves (contractual, ethnic, religious relationships).
The management system: Do employees participate in decision
making in business enterprises? Do the employees have access to
top managers or are those functions concentrated within a social
elite?
40
Social culture
The social culture is constituted by the norms, values and social
codes which form the basis of social interactions and shared
beliefs. This is composed of three components.
Rationality (sự hợp lý, sự hợp lẽ phải), which describes the way
societies set objectives and the importance they attach to formal
systems and processes in setting objectives.
Authority, which describes how societies set rules for vertical
order (and determines the legitimate (đúng luật; hợp pháp)
source of power).
Identity (Tính đồng nhất; sự giống hệt; danh tính), which
describes the rules of horizontal order (what makes the citizens
stick together)
41
Institutional fabric
The institutional fabric represents the organization,
development and allocation of resources, and comprises four
components:
Financial capital, its formation and allocation.
42
Table 3.4 Assessing a business system
43
Table 3.4 Assessing a business system 44
Table 3.4 Assessing a business system
45
Table 3.5 Differences in business systems
46
Table 3.5 Differences in business systems
47
Table 3.5 Differences in business systems
48
The impact of cultures on global
management
Marketing and customer communications (see
Chapter 10)
Human resources (see Chapter 14)
Partnerships, mergers and acquisitionss (see Chapter
9)
Multi-cultural teams
Negotiations
Business practices
49
Multi-cultural teams
Given the variety of cultural heritage, communication and
decision-making processes can be blunted (làm cùn) by cultural
noise: multi-cultural teams can perform either significantly
worse or better than monocultural firms. The performance of
multi-cultural groups is a function of three factors:
1. Multiplicity of perspectives, experiences and viewpoints
increases the richness of information.
2. Possible loss of cohesion owing to miscommunication,
misunderstanding and stereotyping (sự rập khuôn).
3. The ability of team leaders to combine the variety of
perspectives and achieve group synergy.
50
Table 3.6 Types of multi-cultural team
51
Negotiations
The difference between international and
domestic negotiations is the cultural backgrounds
of the parties involved.
52
Negotiation framework
A very simple model of negotiation is provided in Figure 3.2.
All negotiations can be reduced to a buyer and a seller
seeking to settle a transaction: an export contract or a project,
the acquisition of a company or part of it, a licensing contract
or a joint venture agreement.
In all cases the seller implicitly (and sometimes explicitly) has a
reservation price which is the price below which the seller is
ready to walk away because there is a better alternative at
this price
53
Figure 3.2 Framework for negotiation with
reference to international contracts
54
Negotiation framework
For the buyer the situation is symmetrically similar.
Generally, the reservation price will be modified by an
uncertainty factor because forecasts of the potential benefits
or costs are always affected by risks.
The seller’s opening offer in the negotiation will generally be
much higher than his/her reservation price and the buyer’s
will be much lower than his/her reservation price.
55
Negotiation framework
The negotiation then takes the form of a ritual (trình tự)
through which the negotiators will seek to find an agreement in
the bargaining range in Figure 3.2.
If the seller is a better negotiator the price may end up close
to the buyer’s reservation price and vice versa.
At the end, provided the agreement is within the bargaining
range, one obtains a win–win situation in which both parties
benefit.
56
Negotiation process
The negotiation ‘ritual’ generally follows a sequential six-stage
pattern:
1 Pre-negotiation: each party prepares its negotiation strategy.
2 Climate setting: introduction of negotiators, greetings, physical
context.
3 Presentation: agenda-setting, opening statements.
4 Mid-point bargaining: substantive (thực chất) debate, request for
clarification, search for common ground, trial ‘concessions’.
5 Closure: binding concessions (nhượng bộ ràng buộc) offered,
search for agreements, final drafting/signing.
6 Post-negotiation: ratification (thông qua, phê chuẩn) of agreements
by corporate headquarters, or government bodies
57
Cultural aspect of negotiating
58
Cultural aspect of negotiating
59
Cultural aspect of negotiating
60
Figure 3.3 Negotiation attributes and cultural differences
61
Table 3.7 Impact of culture on negotiating behavior: a comparison of American
and Japanese responses
62
Table 3.7 Impact of culture on negotiating behavior: a comparison of American
and Japanese responses
63
Business practices
16-64
Business practices
16-65
Table 3.9 Business practice differences
16-66
Table 3.9 Business practice differences
16-67
Activity 3.1
Choose a country (territory): Japan, China, Korea,
Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan and present your
understandings about this country
Geography
Economy
Culture
68