Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Link Layer Traffic Connectivity Protocol Application and Mechanism in Optical Layer Survivability Approach
Link Layer Traffic Connectivity Protocol Application and Mechanism in Optical Layer Survivability Approach
Link Layer Traffic Connectivity Protocol Application and Mechanism in Optical Layer Survivability Approach
1 Introduction
also describes the network routing with network elements. Fiber optic restoration
is vital scenario where the point to point, span Architecture is used to overcome
multilevel link failures. The design tool here used such as c-programming and ns2
simulators. It provides optimum design in distinguish with different network topolo-
gies with parameters.
2 Problem Definition
FIBER
DISTRIBUTION
CONNECTIVITY
NETWORK
ELEMENTS
LINK
CONNECTIVITY
COST
CONNECTIVITY
TRAFFIC
CONNECTIVITY
MATRIX(TCM)
STOP
In ORM the FDC is further extended in order to protect and restore the traffic in
each link for given network topology. This architecture ensures the protection at
different digital signal levels which are assigned randomly between a common node
(server) to different users to vice versa. The implementation provides the estimation
in the form of distinction between Associated Non-Associated Path Quasi Modes
(ANQM) [6] further the relocation mechanism supports huge no demands through
PPJFIA which facilitates and also extends the mechanism but an IRS (Integration
Restoration Scheme). In this ORM three different topologies, i.e., 6 × 6, 8 × 8, and
482 K. V. S. S. S. S. Sairam and C. Singh
12 × 12 and also can be measured towards NxN where the demands are assigned
via central node to end to end system (Fig. 3).
In this work for example main user (Mu) is connected according to topology
configuration. Further demands are assigned through different Digital Signal Link
Level Design (DSLLD). Where it is considered w.r.t total no of demands.
Protection Mechanism is assigned for Individual link Failure (ILF) and Multi-
Link Failure (MLF). Protection Scheme such as 1:2DP, SHR, APS are used. Failed
path is taken into consideration and alternate path (Backup Path) is employed. Finally
relocation mechanism is estimated, i.e., failed demand to the total no demand through
fiber network restoration mechanism (Table 2).
Link Layer Traffic Connectivity Protocol Application … 483
START
OPTICAL RELOCATION
MECHANISM (ORM)
NETWORK ELEMENTS
PATH CONNECTIVITY
MATRIX
STOP
In optical link layer survivability approach, the extension of first and second problem
and is further evaluated in the form of Optical Link Path Assortment Approach
(OLPAA). It describes the network cross connectivity in terms of demands. That is,
routed through direct and indirect path. In direct path the signal transmits the data
directly between source to destination in indirect path routing in terms of hubs via
parcel list. It results in multilevel period optimality on each routing path for a given
network topology. In this approach it increases multilevel demands connectivity’s
for multiperiod where the max line rate is taken into consideration (Table 3; Fig. 4).
These three approaches are further extended System Survivability Network Inte-
grated Approach (SSNIA). In these it facilitates fiber distribution, fiber relocation
mechanism, OLPAA Approach; finally the capacity is measured through integrated
approach. It also facilities digital signal transformation levels and also end-to-end
connectivity for multiyear demands and it calculates the automatic restoration facility
regarding working and protection fiber. These all SSNIA in these planning models
determines the growth strategy and from beginning year to nth year is calculated.
This total network depicts multiplex performance design for selecting appropriate
fiber optic network survivable architecture and planning period [7, 8].
Table 3 Parcel list algorithm (PLA)
Parameter Network topology
6×6 8×8 12 × 12
Digital signal DS1 DS1 DS1
levels
Circuit con- 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28
figurations
Direct path (1,2)- (2,3)- (4-5)- (2,8)- (7,8)- (4-8)- (12,11)- (7,12)- (5,7)-
assortment
20 → 20 >15 >26 25 → 25 >18 >26 16 → 16 >15 >16
Parcel list (1-2)-20 (2,3)- (4,5)- (2-8)-25 (7,8)- (4,8)- (12,11)-17 (7,12)- (5,7)-
Link Layer Traffic Connectivity Protocol Application …
algorithm
(PLA)
1 → 11 >16 >17 2 → 13 >11 >19 12 → 10 >15 >27
2→9 2- > 9 4- > 8 8 → 12 7- > 7 4- 11 → 7 7- > 8 5-
3- > 7 5- > 9 8- > 4 >11 12- > 7 >11
8- > 8 7-
>16
485
486 K. V. S. S. S. S. Sairam and C. Singh
FIBER DISTRIBUTION
CONNECTIVITY (FDC)
OPTICAL
RELOCATION
MECHANISM (ORM)
PARCEL LIST
ALGORITHM (PLA)
NETWORK
CONNECTIVITY
PARAMETER(NCP)
SSNIA
STOP
In this model the topology is in the form of ring architecture whereas incremental
demand should be less than maximum line rate. In planning period, an incremental
demand on any ring should remain less than maximum line rate. For high-speed archi-
tecture is well as considered by using hubbing/diverse/diverse architecture (Table 4;
Fig. 5).
Table 4 System survivability network integrated approach (SSNIA)
Parameter Network topology
6×6 8×8 12 × 12
Traffic 44 50 65 37 45 70 78 86 36
connectivity
matrix
User 87.50% 84.37% 82.14 88.46% 90.70% 87.50% 90% 82.55% 86.15%
relocation
factor (URF)
Parcel list (1-2)-20 (2,3)- (4,5)- (2-8)-25 (7,8)- (4,8)- (12,11)- (7,12)- (5,7)-
algorithm
Link Layer Traffic Connectivity Protocol Application …
(PLA)
1 → 11 >15 >17 2 → 13 >11 >19 16 >15 >27
2→9 2- > 8 4- > 8 8 → 12 7- > 7 4- > 11 12 → 9 7- > 8 5- > 11
3- > 7 5- > 9 8- > 4 8- > 8 11 → 7 12- > 7 7- > 16
DS-STS- 115 118 124 126 129 138 150 165 220
STM-OC
487
488 K. V. S. S. S. S. Sairam and C. Singh
Graph
(See Fig. 6).
3 Conclusion
The reconfigurable optical network provides users equipment and optical fiber equip-
ment with each other. The PPJFA approach enhances the performance of survivable
fiber network and correlation of these results collaborates this algorithm validation.
These architectures are well used in the context of incremental changes towards
the exit network in order to improve survivability throughout in optical network.
Further this work can be extended by convergence of distributed algorithm by using
synchronous competition and scholastic approximation and also transition from ring-
to-ring-mesh-hybrid approach.
References
1. Skoog, R., Von Lehmen, A.: Metro network design methodologies and demands. IEEE J. Light
Wave Technol. 22(11), 2680–2692 (2015)
2. Kavian, Y.S., Rashvand, H.F., Leeson, M.S., Ren, W., Hines, E.L., Naderi, M.: Network topol-
ogy effect on QoS delivering in survivable DWDM optical networks. J. Telecommun. Inform.
Technol. 68–71 (2016)
3. Zhou, D., Subramaniam, S.: Survivability in optical networks. IEEE Netw. 14, 16–23 (2015)
4. Strand, J., Chiu, A., Tkach, R.: Issues for routing in the optical layer. IEEE Commun. Mag. 39,
81–87 (2013)
5. Zang, H., Ou, C., Mukherjee, B.: Path-protection routing and wavelength assignment (RWA)
in WDM mesh networks under ductlayer constraints. IEEE-ACM Trans. Networking 11(2),
248–258 (2015)
Link Layer Traffic Connectivity Protocol Application … 489
6. Shao, X., Zhou, L., Cheng, X., Zheng, W., Wang, Y.: Best Ef-fort shared risk link group (SRLG)
failure protection in WDM networks. In: Proceeding IEEE International Conference on Com-
munication, pp. 5150–5154 (2015)
7. Katiyar, P., Dwivedi, R.K., Jain, A.K.: Network survivability in WDM. In: Proceeding IEEE
International Conference on Communication, pp. 150–154 (2015)
8. Strand, J., Chiu, A., Tkach, R.: Issues for routing in the optical layer. IEEE Commun. Mag. 39,
81–87 (2011)