Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reviewers For COMPRE
Reviewers For COMPRE
Teachers are mentors and play an active role in inculcating independent thinking in students. However, to
do that as a teacher, you must have a teaching philosophy of your own. Students always look up to their
teacher and therefore, it becomes necessary for you to have thoughts to inspire them. Here are specific
reasons why you should Study Philosophy of Education if you are a teacher.
Other Sources:
In life it is important to understand who you are as a person, what you believe in and what you hold
to be real. These values are important because they dictate what you do in your life as well as how you act
and react to situations that you may face. This concept holds no less importance or value in the profession
of teaching. Who you are as a person and what you believe in controls what you will be like as a teacher.
Your philosophy as a teacher is important because it leads to, among other aspects, exactly how you
present yourself, your material and how you develop you students. Figuring out what precisely your
personal philosophy is helps you to understand what kind of teacher you want to be.
For the most part there are six main areas of educational philosophy that teachers can fall into.
Sometimes a teacher can have one main philosophy that he or she feels suits them perfectly. It is also
possible that a teacher may combine two philosophies that they may feel contour better to their beliefs.
These six main areas of educational philosophy are perennialism, essentialism, behaviorism,
progressivism, reconstructionism, and existentialism. These philosophical areas evolved and broadened
from the four classical views of philosophy to shape to the different styles of teachers in today’s schools.
Those classical views were idealism, realism, pragmatism and existentialism. These classical philosophies
evolved as a result of the changing landscapes of teaching. They had adapted to form the six areas we
have come to understand today.
When trying to understand what type of philosophy it is you as a teacher want to categorize and
substantially implicate into your teaching, it is important to first find out who you are as a person. What is
important to you in life, how you learn best, how you think others learn best and what is real to you are all
important questions to ask yourself. For me, I feel I fall into two main philosophies, progressivism and
existentialism. Progressivism being the philosophy that says ideas should be tested to find their truths. This
philosophy also says the value of questions from students are very important because it leads to learning.
Progressivism involves both cross discipline learning and problem solving in its instruction. It states that
learning occurs best when students are involved and experiencing ideas for themselves. In relation
existentialism says that Self-actualization, or knowing who you are before you can learn, is very important.
Free will, free choice and the expression of ones own feelings are also all important aspects of
existentialism. I feel like I fall into these two categories for a number of reasons. I have always thought of
myself as a free thinker and someone who likes to incorporate a lot of different aspects and experiences
into what I do. I enjoy studying those things that I find interesting and engaging. In my classroom I would
encourage my students to speak out on their interests, concerns, ideas and comments. As a teacher I
would try and find out what it is my students enjoy and feel is important. I would in turn use that information
to balance my lessons and curriculum. I would also try to incorporate different subjects into my teaching as
well, i.e. history into a philosophy class and visa versa. I would do this to illustrate how a diverse education
is important. I feel this way because when you understand different aspects of learning or disciplines it is
much easier to relate to and compare certain subjects. This side of my personality I feel is suited well by
both existentialism and progressivism. Both categories have aspects of my feelings and beliefs on the
abovementioned topics. Another aspect I feel that has driven me to my philosophical beliefs is my own
experience in the classroom. I have always felt I have learned much better when I was given the chance to
experience and question for myself the material I was being taught. When I am lectured to I certainly retain
the material but it is not always easily retrieved when I need it. On the other hand when I experiment,
experience, or am involved in someway to what is being taught, I seem to retain the information much
better. As a teacher I would like to present my students with a variety of activities that would stimulate them
to learn in a different manner than they might be used to. I would want them to be active participants in the
classroom and in the work I would be doing with them. I would encourage them to question both what they
were being taught, and myself as well as to have the desire to find out more. I think this would create a
stimulus that may help them to retain the subject matter in a way they could relate to. These are the
reasons I believe I feel so strongly about progressivism as a philosophy of education. I have found that I
also believe that the involvement of my philosophies will encourage my students to be more engaged in
what they are learning. I feel as if the two philosophies together create excited students who are willing to
accept learning and teaching alike. I think that engagement would definitely direct them to participate
actively in classroom activities and discussions. I feel that if students have this type of engagement it would
make schools and learning both fun and enjoyable for both students and teachers.
Of course aside from my desired two philosophies there are areas of the others I also find
appealing. Just because I fall into two main categories does not mean there are aspects of the others I do
not find appealing or applicable. Some of these aspects I find useful are that perennialists believe there are
everlasting truths in education. Those are the underlying themes that are always constant in learning. I
think this is true. Another aspect I can relate to is the concept that behaviorists stress organization. I feel an
organized person has a much more clear view of what he or she has to accomplish, whether that be a
teacher or student. If you can see what needs to be done it is much easier to complete. A final example of
my margins of philosophy is how reconstructionalists preach engagement of change. Change can
sometimes be a very good thing. Whether it be changing the landscape of society or changing how
something is presented in class. Sometimes switching things up can benefit everyone. But just because I
feel these concepts are admirable does not change my true philosophies. As a person and a teacher it is
important to make the distinction between what you just agree with and what you truly feel is vital to your
life and teaching. It is important to know what you are passionate about. I agree with the fore-mentioned
aspects of educational philosophy but I truly feel that progressivism and existentialism suite me much better
as a perspective teacher.
As a someday-teacher I feel that if I practice the beliefs of progressivism and existentialism I will be
successful. The results of the two philosophies combined, I feel, will create the ideal learning environment
for both the instructor and the student. I feel as if my personality, beliefs and overall attitude reflect on the
philosophies I have chosen. I also think that my demeanor and attitude will work congruently with those
philosophies to make for the best learning situations. This will in turn hopefully result in a successful
teaching career as well as successful students.
The evident ones are Constructivism, Progressivism, and Reconstructionism. Constructivism K-12 uses the
spiral progression, that is, as the learning progresses, more and more details are introduced. The concepts
are taught early then re-taught in succeeding years with increased sophistication and complexity.
Ads by Ad.Plus
The evident ones are Constructivism, Progressivism, and Reconstructionism. Const r uct i vi sm K-12 uses
the spiral progression, that is, as the learning progresses, more and more details are introduced. The
concepts are taught early then re-taught in succeeding years with increased sophistication and complexity.
Which methods of teaching does the K to 12 curriculum use?
The teaching approaches of the subjects in K to 12 Curriculum were stated in section 5 of the Enhanced
Basic Education Act of 2013 namely, learner – centered, inclusive, developmentally appropriate, relevant
and responsive, research – based, culture sensitive, contextualized and global, constructivist, inquiry –
based, ...
The K to 12 Program covers Kindergarten and 12 years of basic education (six years of primary education,
four years of Junior High School, and two years of Senior High School [SHS]) to provide sufficient time for
mastery of concepts and skills, develop lifelong learners, and prepare graduates for tertiary education, ...
Perennialists believe that the focus of education should be the ideas that have lasted over centuries. They
believe the ideas are as relevant and meaningful today as when they were written. ... The perennialist
curriculum is universal and is based on their view that all human beings possess the same essential nature.
Perennialism is a teacher-centered educational philosophy that focuses on everlasting ideas and universal
truths. To clarify, Perennialism suggests that the focus of education should be the ideas that have lasted for
centuries believing the ideas are as relevant and meaningful today as when they were written.
The goal of reconstructionist learning for students is that they themselves may envision the good future and
spend their learning as a preparation for their role in the future for which they reach. This is an idea of
change for a better educational system.
What is social reconstruction ideology?
Social Reconstructionists assume that education, if it is revitalized along the lines they recommend, has the
power to educate people to analyze and understand social problems, envision a world in which those
problems do not exist, and act so as to bring that vision into existence.
Dewey believed in the continuity of experience, or the connection between a student's learning experiences
and that student's future decisions and behavior. He also believed that educational experiences required
interaction between between the student and their environment in order to be effective.
John Dewey was a leading proponent of the American school of thought known as pragmatism, a view that
rejected the dualistic epistemology and metaphysics of modern philosophy in favor of a naturalistic
approach that viewed knowledge as arising from an active adaptation of the human organism to its
environment.
THE INFLUENCE OF PHILOSOPHY TO CURRICULUM
Educators, curriculum makers, and teachers must have espoused a philosophy or philosophies deemed
necessary for planning, implementing, and evaluating a school curriculum. The philosophy they have
embraced will help them achieve the following:
1. define the school’s purpose,
2. identify the essential subjects to be taught,
3. design the learning students must have,
4. develop approaches or methodologies on how students can gain the knowledge, skills, and
attitude,
5. produce the instructional materials,
6. identify the methods and strategies to be used, and
7. determine how teachers will evaluate students.
Likewise, philosophy offers solutions to problems by helping the administrators, curriculum planners, and
teachers make sound decisions. A person’s philosophy reflects his/her life experiences, social and
economic background, shared beliefs, and education.
When John Dewey proposed that “education is a way of life,” his philosophy is realized when put into
practice. Now, particularly in the Philippines, Dewey’s philosophy served as an anchor for the country’s
educational system.
HISTORY AND ITS INFLUENCE TO CURRICULUM
The history of one’s country can affect its educational system and the curriculum. If we trace the
curriculum’s formal beginning, we get back in time to Franklin Bobbit’s book entitled “The Curriculum,”
published in 1918.
From Bobbit’s time to Tyler, many developments in the purposes, principles, and contents of the curriculum
took place. Please read the Six Famous Curriculum Theorists and their Contributions to Education for more
information.
THE INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGY TO CURRICULUM: FOUR MAJOR FOUNDATIONS
The curriculum is influenced by psychology. Psychology provides information about the teaching and
learning process. It also seeks answers how a curriculum will be organized to achieve students’ learning at
the optimum level and what amount of information they can absorb in learning the various contents of the
curriculum.
The following are some psychological theories in learning that served as major foundations of curriculum
development:
1. BEHAVIORISM
Education in the 20th century was dominated by behaviorism. The mastery of the subject is given more
emphasis. So, learning is organized in a step-by-step process. Using drills and repetition are common.
For this reason, many educational psychologists viewed it as mechanical and routine. Though many are
skeptical about this theory, we can’t deny the influences it had on our educational system.
2. COGNITIVISM
Cognitive theorists focus on how individuals process information, monitor and manage their thinking. The
basic questions cognitive psychologists zero in on are:
How do learners process and store information?
How do they retrieve data and generate conclusions?
How much information can they absorb?
With their beliefs, they promote the development of problem-solving and thinking skills and popularize
reflective thinking, creative thinking, intuitive thinking, discovery learning, and others.
3. HUMANISM
Humanism is taken from Gestalt’s theory, Abraham Maslow’s theory, and Carl Rogers’ theory. This group
of psychologists is concerned with the development of human potential.
In this theory, the curriculum is after the process, not the product; focuses on personal needs, not on the
subject; and clarifying psychological meanings and environmental situations. In short, curriculum views
founded on humanism posit that learners are human beings who are affected by their biology, culture, and
environment. They are neither machines nor animals.
Along this line, curriculum developers must craft a more advanced, more comprehensive curriculum that
promotes human potential. Teachers educate not only the minds, but the hearts as well.
Here is a three-minute video that explains further the humanist’s point of view.
4. SOCIOLOGY AND CURRICULUM
Among the major foundations of curriculum development, the sociological theory emphasizes the influence
of society on education. It is founded on the belief that there is a mutual and encompassing relationship
between society and curriculum because it exists within the societal context. Though schools are formal
institutions that educate the people, other units of society educate or influence the way people think, such
as families and friends, and communities.
Since society is dynamic, many developments are difficult to cope with and adjust to. But the schools are
made to address and understand the changes not only in one’s country but in the world as well.
Therefore, schools must be relevant by making their curriculum more innovative and interdisciplinary. A
curriculum that can address global learners’ diversities, the explosion of knowledge through the internet,
and the educational reforms and policies recommended or mandated by the United Nations.
However, it is also imperative that a country must have maintained a curriculum that reflects and preserves
its culture and aspirations for national identity. No matter how far people go, it is the country’s responsibility
to ensure that the school serves its purpose of educating the citizenry.
Now, it is your time to reflect. Can you think of your experiences in which the major foundation of the
curriculum can explain it?
Try to ask yourself the following questions:
1. Why should I take history, philosophy, psychology or even PE subjects in college?
2. Why is it that the Department of Education is implementing K to 12 and the mother tongue-based
curriculum?
3. Why is there institutional amalgamation?
4. Why is there “One UP” (One University of the Philippines) now in the Philippines?
5. Why is there a need for a globalized higher education?
These questions imply that change will take place soon. So, brace yourself for the many changes that will
take place in education!
Other Sources:
The K 12 program in the Philippines was introduced in 2013. It was in 2013 when RA 10533 became a law.
This law is known as the “Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013”.
It was popularly called K to 12 because the act, (RA 10533), enhanced the Philippine Basic Education
System by strengthening its curriculum and increasing the number of years for basic education.
Basic education in the Philippines before K to 12 consists of 6 years of elementary education and 4 years
of high school education.
The enhanced basic education act of 2013 or K to 12 as it is commonly known now, provides for a
mandatory
1 year of Kindergarten,
6 years of elementary,
4 years of junior high school, and
2 years of senior high school.
The K 12 program applies to both public educational institutions and private educational institutions.
The enhanced basic education act of 2013 or RA 10533 did not only lengthened the number of years of
basic education but also provided that basic education may not only be delivered via regular schools but
may likewise be delivered through the alternative learning system.
Acceleration of students or learners in public and private basic educational institutions is still allowed in
accordance with the Department of Education rules and regulations.
The very goal of the K 12 Program is to produce 21st-century graduates equipped with the core values and
lifelong competencies they need to contribute to societal development and nation-building.
The two additional years of Senior High School (SHS) will provide graduates with four exits and life options,
namely, employment, entrepreneurship, higher education, and middle-level skills development.
What is the legal basis of the K-12 curriculum?
The Philosophical and legal basis of the K-12 curriculum are the following:
The 1987 Philippine Constitution
B.P. 232, Education Act of 1982
The 4 Pillars of Education (UNESCO)
The Vision-Mission Statement of the Department of Education
The EDCOM Report of 1991
Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda (BESRA)
R.A. No.9155, Philippine Governance Act
The recent news that the K to 12 programs were abolished by the government was not true.
The K to 12 program was created by law and only a law will abolish or repel it. It cannot be abolished or
repelled by the President or anybody for that matter.
Remember that the duty or mandate of the President of the Philippines is to enforce the law.
Only the Congress of the Philippines, consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives, has the
power to abolished or repel a law such as the “Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013”, popularly known as
K to 12.
There are four philosophical perspectives currently used in educational settings: essentialism,
perennialism, progressivism, and social reconstructionism/critical pedagogy. Unlike the more abstract
ontology and axiology, these four perspectives focus primarily on what should be taught and how it should
be taught, i.e. the curriculum.
Essentialism
Essentialism adheres to a belief that a core set of essential skills must be taught to all students.
Essentialists tend to privilege traditional academic disciplines that will develop prescribed skills and
objectives in different content areas as well as develop a common culture. Typically, essentialism argues
for a back-to-basics approach on teaching intellectual and moral standards. Schools should prepare all
students to be productive members of society. Essentialist curricula focuses on reading, writing, computing
clearly and logically about objective facts about the outside real world. Schools should be sites of rigor
where students learn to work hard and respect authority. Because of this stance, essentialism tends to
subscribe to tenets of Realism. Essentialist classrooms tend to be teacher-centered in instructional
delivery with an emphasis on lecture and teacher demonstrations.
Key theorists:
Perennialism
Perennialism advocates for seeking, teaching, and learning universal truths that span across historical time
periods. These truths, Perennialists argue, have everlasting importance in helping humans solve problems
regardless of time and place. While Perennialism resembles essentialism at first glance, perennialism
focuses on the individual development of the student rather than emphasizing skills. Perennialism supports
liberal arts curricula that helps produces well-rounded individuals with some knowledge across the arts and
sciences. All students should take classes in English Language Arts, foreign languages, mathematics,
natural sciences, fine arts, and philosophy. Like Essentialism, Perennialism may tend to favor teacher-
centered instruction; however, Perennialists do utilize student-centered instructional activities like Socratic
Seminar, which values and encourages students to think, rationalize, and develop their own ideas on
topics.
Key theorists:
Progressivism focuses its educational stance toward experiential learning with a focus on developing the
whole child. Students learn by doing rather than being lectured to by teachers. Curriculum is
usually integrated across contents instead of siloed into different disciplines. Progressivism’s stance is in
stark contrast to both Essentialism and Perennialism in this manner. Progressivism follows a clear
pragmatic ontology where the learner focuses on solving real-world problems through real experiences.
Progressivist classrooms are student-centered where students will work in cooperative/collaborative groups
to do project-based, expeditionary, problem-based, and/or service-learning activities. In progressivist
classrooms, students have opportunities to follow their interests and have shared authority in planning and
decision making with teachers.
Key theorists:
Social reconstructionism was founded as a response to the atrocities of World War II and the Holocaust to
assuage human cruelty. Social reform in response to helping prepare students to make a better world
through instilling democratic values. Critical pedagogy emerged from the foundation of the early social
reconstructionist movement. Critical pedagogy is the application of critical theory to education. For critical
pedagogues, teaching and learning is inherently a political act and they declare that knowledge and
language are not neutral, nor can they be objective. Therefore, issues involving social, environmental, or
economic justice cannot be separated from the curriculum. Critical pedagogy’s goal is to emancipate
marginalized or oppressed groups by developing, according to Paulo Freire, conscientização, or critical
consciousness in students. Critical pedagogy de-centers the traditional classroom, which positions teacher
at the center. The curriculum and classroom with a critical pedagogy stance is student-centered and
focuses its content on social critique and political action.
Key theorists:
Paulo Freire, bell hooks (note: bell hooks intentionally does not capitalize her name, which follows her
critical stance that language, even how we write one’s own name, is political and ideological.)
Socio – Psycho
As learning professionals, we are always interested in learning theories, especially if we’ve been in the
industry for a while and have seen more than one learning theory applied to our development over the
years.
I’ve recently been giving thought as to how millennials learn, for example: Which methods work best for a
millennial? What is the best way to engage a millennial? What is the best way to design learning for a
millennial? So, why not think about which learning theory or theories work best for a millennial?
Let’s start with looking at what are the basic learning theories…
Behaviorism
The main idea in this theory is stimulus-response. All behavior is caused by external stimuli and either
positive or negative re-enforcement. Learning is defined as behavior change in the learner and the learner
is viewed as passive, responding to motivations.
Reflecting on what I have learned about millennials as a generation that wants learning to be interactive,
relevant, fun, and technologically current – even though millennials do respond to positive reinforcement —
I don’t believe this is the best theory to apply when developing for millennials.
Cognitivism
The main idea here is that mental function can be understood. This theory focuses on inner mental
activities, compared in part to a computer. Information comes in, is processed, and leads to certain
outcomes. In fact, the learner is viewed as an information processor.
This theory seems a little closer; however, as much as millennials like lots of information, I don’t see that
this is the best learning theory to apply to this generation. I have always thought of cognitivism as being
more individual learning and talking heads. Millennials want collaborative learning and an instructor that will
facilitate the learning process, acting as a partner in the learning experience.
Constructivism
With this theory, learning is an active, constructive process. Learners are actively involved with the learning
process and help create their own learning paths. New information is linked to prior knowledge and an
individual’s experiences are aligned with his or her internal representation of the world. The learner is
viewed as an information constructor.
This generation wants choices on how they learn and wants to be able to access learning on various
devices. They want their learning to mean something to them now or in the near future, and they want just-
in-time learning — something easily accessible when they need it. They like teamwork, collaboration and
interactivity — not just lecture, and they want to have fun when learning.
Constructivism seems best fitted for today’s millennials. Although it brings active learning theory to reality
for the millennials, it also allows them to be part of the “construction” of their learning experience. A winner
on both counts for a generation in search of new ways in learning!
Active learning is an instructional approach in which students actively participate in the learning process, as
opposed to sitting quietly and listening. Strategies include, but are not limited to, question-and-answer
sessions, discussion, interactive lecture (in which students respond to or ask questions), quick writing
assignments, hands-on activities, and experiential learning. As you think of integrating active learning
strategies into your course, consider ways to set clear expectations, design effective evaluation strategies,
and provide helpful feedback.
Understanding & engaging today's learners
Building Inclusive Classrooms
Who are today's learners? "They display ambition, confidence, optimism, and a capacity for high-level
cooperative work. At the same time, they measure high on scales of stress, conventionality, and over-
reliance on parents" (Wilson & Gerber, 2008, p. 29). The techniques below are just a few strategies that
instructors have used to engage today’s learners.
Start creating a positive classroom environment on the first day. Smile and look at the class while
talking.
At the beginning of the year, ask students to share their name and their passions; write it down.
Group students by their interests and give them differentiated assignments more relevant to those
interests if the opportunity arises.
Address students by name.
Take time to learn about students’ values by asking questions and engaging in discussions that
may not be part of the planned lecture.
Share your own values, interests, and experiences as today’s students respond to and respect the
voice of elders.
Students want to know what to expect and how to succeed. Be clear about course goals, targets,
and purpose in order to avoid any misunderstandings in the future.
Provide feedback on observations and class assignments. Avoid direct criticism that may be taken
personally.
Offer opportunities for interpersonal involvement through regular office hours.
Pose questions that gauge student learning of terms, concepts, and principles and allow them to
apply their knowledge to real-world situations.
Millennials are accustomed to a more supervised and structured environment. Provide occasional
indeterminate problems and case studies that challenge students to evaluate different methods
that yield different solutions—have them share their thinking with the class.
Create guiding questions for students to answer on their own or in groups and explain or provide a
list of appropriate academic resources. All students today are capable of learning course material
using internet, libraries, or course technology if given direction.
Students grew up using computers and internet, so utilize their talents and knowledge. Don’t be
afraid to ask for help with technology or to co-create assignments and projects.
This generation thinks in many dimensions at once. Provide opportunities for students to be
creative in how they approach assignments.
Break up the class time into 20-30-minute segments with activities such as small-group
discussions or five-minute reflection papers and quizzes to maintain student focus and assist with
processing and assimilation of information.
Students today are group-oriented and demand interactivity in the classroom. Creating ongoing
opportunities for peer instruction and evaluation engages students deeper in the material, reduces
lecturing, and minimizes the amount they rely on peers in group work.
Don’t be afraid to break from the curricula to discuss current events. Capitalize on this opportunity
for students to apply course material to the real-world.
If the subject matter has several clearly defined and/or opposing views, split the class into two or
more groups and simulate a formal debate, providing sufficient time to discuss, present, and rebut
ideas.
For individual or small-group exercises, have students work at the blackboard or create visual lists
on poster board.
Develop opportunities for experiential learning such as service learning and community field
experiences.
Consumer orientation
Entertainment orientation
Entitlement
Instant gratification
Short event horizon
Adaptability & pragmatism
Excellence
Skepticism
Cynicism
Intellectually disengaged
Safety issues
Stressed
Civility issues
Diverse
(Taylor, 2006)
Students feel physically and emotionally safe. They see the classroom as a place where they can
be themselves and express themselves and their ideas without judgment.
Students know that they are valued and respected, regardless of other factors such as ability,
gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, or religion.
Students have ownership and input related to class structure and expectations. This can range
from creating spaces specifically for student use to having a class discussion to establish norms
and expectations.
All students are challenged to achieve high expectations, and all students receive the support
necessary to meet those expectations.
Standards of behavior are established and are consistently and equitably enforced for all students.
Class structure provides multiple and varied opportunities for students to experience success.
The teacher gets to know all students and uses that knowledge to create meaningful experiences.
There is a positive rapport (relationship) between the teacher and students and among students in
the class.
Creating a positive learning environment begins with the teacher's self-reflection, continues with planning,
and then is ongoing and dynamic during the implementation of the curriculum. Maintaining a positive
learning environment is a work in progress - you must always consider how to maintain a positive learning
environment and must be thoughtful about how the learning environment is perceived by students.
As with curriculum development, a positive learning environment takes planning and thought. It is important
to continually monitor and adapt your strategies to meet the changing needs of your students. No two
students are the same and no two classes are the same. You need to be aware of the differences in your
classes (e.g., personalities, dynamics, interests, strengths, learning styles) and adjust your strategies to
meet your students' needs. Also keep in mind that students' needs can change within a semester, term, or
year. You should do the best you can to plan ahead of time, but be aware that once you get to know your
students, you may need to adjust your strategies to ensure that everyone feels safe, supported, and
valued. This chapter will discuss strategies for creating a positive learning environment in the classroom.
Some ideas may work better for you than others, but we hope to give you plenty of ideas that you can use
to develop and maintain a positive learning environment.
KNOW YOURSELF
Before planning the specifics of your positive learning environment, take time to reflect on who you are and
how you arrived at your values, beliefs, behaviors, and attitudes. If you haven't explored how your beliefs
and values shape your personality and decisions, it is difficult to guide students as they think about who
they are. The Exploring Personal Beliefs and Values sidebar poses a few questions to use as a starting
point.
After you have taken some time to explore your personal beliefs and values, the next step is to think about
how you will influence the learning environment in your classroom. Take time to consider how you can build
on your strengths while also addressing your weaknesses. Remember that weaknesses aren't necessarily
negatives; they represent areas for improvement. As long as you recognize your areas for improvement
and don't let them negatively affect your students' experience, they can be opportunitiesfor growth. For
example, you may have a strong belief that poor personal hygiene is a reflection of a person's self-esteem.
However, you have a student who does not use deodorant for cultural reasons. You will need to respect
your student's beliefs and not let your personal views affect how you teach or interact with that student. It is
equally important that you model appropriate interactions with people who have different beliefs, ideas, or
values. Your classroom should be a place where students learn, observe, and practice positive interactions
with others regardless of differences. When you reinforce healthy and appropriate discourse, you provide
students with an opportunity to share beliefs, take into account another person's point of view, and then
filter through everything they have learned in order to form their own opinions.
Self-reflection is not an evaluative exercise in which you criticize yourself or try to identify things you are not
good at. Rather, this is a time to get to understand yourself better, to understand where you are coming
from, and to discover where and how you can build on your strengths to support your students.
Positive, productive learning environments are key to students' academic, emotional and social success in
school. Unfortunately, positive learning environments don't just happen on their own–they must be created.
There are many components that go into making a positive learning environment for students. For starters,
positive learning environments should offer a climate of safety, where risk-taking is encouraged, there is
open authentic conversation, trust and respect are fostered, and positive interaction is the norm.
The best time to start developing a positive learning environment in your classroom is during the first days,
weeks, and months of the school year–but it's never too late to get started. Below, we'll explore positive
action strategy, and several simple tips, that teachers, educators, and even parents, can use for creating a
positive, productive learning environment for students. By implementing these strategies, you'll be able
combine the need for positive learning environments that foster improved academic performance, with the
ability to promote students' social and emotional wellbeing and progress inside and outside the classroom.
. Modes of teaching and learning have had to rapidly shift amid the COVID-19 pandemic. As an emergency
response, students from Philippine public schools were provided learning modules based on a minimized
list of essential learning competencies in Biology. Using a cross-sectional survey method, we investigated
students’ perceptions of the Biology self-learning modules (BSLM) that were designed in print and digitized
formats according to a constructivist learning approach. Senior high school STEM students from grades 11
(n = 117) and 12 (n = 104) participated in a survey using a 3-point Likert-scale questionnaire uploaded
online through Google Forms. The survey results indicate that majority of the students perceived the
modules positively, suggesting that aspects of the modules that were salient to students corresponded to
essential elements of constructivist pedagogies. However, during interviews, students reported several
difficulties in learning with BSLM as it was constrained by, to name a few, the use of unfamiliar words, lack
of access to supporting resources, slow internet connection, and time constraints. To address these
problems, teachers reported that they gave deadline extensions, complemented modules with other
channels of support, and used online and offline platforms for reaching out to students to answer their
queries and plan out their schedule for the week. The findings across the data sources point to the complex
demands of emergency distance education that teachers, as curriculum designers and enactors, need to
bear in mind in order to craft productive pedagogies, constructivist or otherwise, during this unprecedented
time.