Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Liquid Smoke
Liquid Smoke
Liquid Smoke
Food Control
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodcont
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Liquid smoke flavouring as an all-natural food additive is usually prepared by smouldering or a carbonisation
Bioactive compounds method. In this study, liquid smoke was prepared by fast pyrolysis technology using a fluidised bed reactor with a
Fast pyrolysis yield of 30 wt%. GC-MS analysis showed that main functional compounds were furans, carbonyls and phenols.
Liquid smoke
The fast pyrolysis liquid smoke presented a high antioxidant capacity with a total phenolic content of 21.9 mg
Smoked mussel
Preservation
GAE/mL. Cytotoxicity analysis indicated that it was as safe as commercial liquid smoke products. This fast
Toxicity pyrolysis liquid smoke was diluted and applied to treat green lipped mussel meat, and the preserving effects were
studied over 30-day refrigerated storage. The microbiological analysis results showed bacteria growth was
inhibited during the first 14 days of the storage period. The image and texture analysis results showed insig
nificant changes to liquid smoked mussel meat during storage except for colour darkening and decreased
hardness in meat texture.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: s.baroutian@auckland.ac.nz (S. Baroutian).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107874
Received 5 May 2020; Received in revised form 25 November 2020; Accepted 10 January 2021
Available online 14 January 2021
0956-7135/© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
X. Xin et al. Food Control 124 (2021) 107874
2. Materials and methods GCMS QP5000 instrument (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a DB-5HT
column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.1 μm). An injection volume of 1 μL
2.1. Liquid smoke production with a split ratio of 100:1 was used, and the injection temperature was
set at 280 ◦ C. The oven temperature was set initially at 50 ◦ C and
Hickory woodchips were purchased from Smokai Limited (New increased to 250 ◦ C by a rate of 20 ◦ C/min, then was held for 5 min.
Zealand). The particle size was in the range of 2–4 mm to meet the re Helium gas was used as the carrier with a flow rate of 3 mL/min. Mass
quirements of a fluidised bed reactor, and the moisture content was 9.2 spectra were operated in electron ionization mode at 70 eV, and the
wt% as received. mass range was 50–300 amu for acquisition. Chemical components were
A bubbling fluidised bed reactor was employed to prepare liquid identified by comparing the mass spectra with those in the library NIST
smoke by fast pyrolysis process. This reactor as illustrated in Fig. 1 and by comparing the data results with previous studies (Bridgwater,
consisted mainly of a biomass hopper, a feeding auger, a fluid bed, an 2012; Montazeri, Oliveira, Himelbloom, Leigh, & Crapo, 2013). Their
electric nitrogen gas heater, two cyclones, three condensers (shell and relative proportions were calculated based on the peak area of total
tube type) and a cotton filter for gas filtration. ionization chromatogram (TIC).
Woodchips were loaded in biomass hopper and silica sand loaded The concentration (mg/mL) of residual matters in the fast pyrolysis
into the fluid bed. The fluidised bed reactor was heated to the target liquid smoke was measured gravimetrically following a previous study
temperature of 420 ◦ C. Nitrogen gas at a flowrate of 60 SLPM (standard (Vidal, Goicoechea, Manzanos, & Guillén, 2017). Three 5 mL of aliquots
litre per minute) was preheated to 420 ◦ C by the gas heater and was were transferred into three pre-dried aluminium pans, respectively.
purged into the bed from the bottom. Before fast pyrolysis, woodchips These samples were dried in a 40 ◦ C oven until they reached constant
were fed into the bed bottom via the auger at a feeding rate of 1.2 kg/h. weights. The results indicated the content of residual matters in the
The woodchips were pyrolysed in the bed, and converted to smoke, liquid smoke, as some light molecules were volatilised during
pyrolytic gas and biochar. All products were entrained with nitrogen gas oven-drying.
flow to cyclones 1 and 2 in series. The two cyclones collected only The pH value of the fast pyrolysis liquid smoke was measured using a
biochar by maintaining at a temperature of approximately 350 ◦ C to pH meter (Mettler FE28).
avoid any condensation. The smoke and pyrolytic gas were entrained to
condensers 1, 2 and 3 in series. The temperature in condenser 1 was set 2.2.2. Determination of total phenolic content
to 120–130 ◦ C by maintaining a balance of heat exchange between hot The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined by a spectropho
smoke and air. Condenser 1 collected only thick tar containing high tometric assay method, Folin–Ciocalteu assay described in a previous
boiling-point compounds. Condenser 2 was kept at 20–25 ◦ C by study (Putnam, Bombick, Avalos, & Doolittle, 1999). TPC value in
exchanging heat with tap water flowing through the condenser’s tubes, dicates the antioxidant capacity of liquid smoke, as phenols are the
and liquid smoke was collected at this stage. The smoke was further essential antioxidants in liquid smoke (Singleton, Orthofer, &
cooled to 5 ◦ C in condenser 3 to collect remained smoke condensate. Lamuela-Raventós, 1999). Particularly, methoxyphenols are efficient
Condenser 3 exchanged heat with chilled water at the same tempera scavengers of free radicals due to their hydroxyl groups (Soldera,
ture. A gas filter was connected to condenser 3 to capture smoke aero Sebastianutto, & Bortolomeazzi, 2008). Chemicals for analysis included
sols. Wood smoke usually contained aerosols, which were hard to be gallic acid, sodium carbonate and Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent from
captured by shell and tube condensers. Lastly, pyrolytic gas and nitrogen Sigma-Aldrich (New Zealand).
gas were vented to a fume cabinet. Gallic acid was used to prepare standard solutions with concentra
After fast pyrolysis, the raw liquid smoke from condensers 2 and 3 tions of 1.000, 0.500, 0.250, 0.100, 0.050 and 0.025 mg/mL. After
was mixed and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min. An oil phase product preparation, 200 μL of the liquid smoke sample, standard solution and
was separated from the raw liquid smoke. A full-strength liquid smoke distilled water (blank) aliquots were pipetted into a 96-well plate. Then
was obtained and stored at 5 ◦ C. 100 μL of 10-fold diluted Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 800 μL of 750 mM
sodium carbonate aliquots were pipetted into each well. After incu
2.2. Liquid smoke characterisation bating for 30 min in the dark, the absorbance of each well was measured
using a PerkinElmer ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer at 765 nm.
2.2.1. Chemical characterisation Absorbance values of measured samples were then compared against the
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis was calibration curves to determine the equivalent values. The TPC results
conducted twice to identify chemical compounds contained in the fast were reported as mg gallic acid equivalent/mL (mg GAE/mL).
pyrolysis liquid smoke. The liquid smoke was mixed with dichloro
methane in a volume ratio of 1/2 (liquid smoke/dichloromethane) 2.2.3. Cytotoxicity assay
before GC-MS analysis. Then the mixture was agitated at 200 rpm for 6 A cell line derived from murine fibroblast (L cells, ATCC® CRL-
h. Dichloromethane was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (New Zealand). 2648™) was purchased from In Vitro Technology (New Zealand) in May
The dichloromethane extract samples were injected to a Shimadzu 2019. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (ATCC®
30–2002™) and fetal bovine serum for culturing the cell line were
purchased from the same place. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-
diphenyl tetrazolium bromide), PBS (phosphate buffered saline) and
DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) were from Sigma-Aldrich (New Zealand).
The effect of fast pyrolysis liquid smoke on L cells viability was
determined using the MTT colourimetric assay (Kjällstrand & Petersson,
2001; Mosmann, 1983). A completed culture medium, DMEM supple
mented with 10% fetal bovine serum, was prepared for cell culturing.
For cytotoxicity analysis, L cells were seeded in a 96-well plate each at a
density of 10 × 103 cells per well. Then they were grown at 37 ◦ C in a
humidified atmosphere for 24 h. Distilled water as control and liquid
smoke samples diluted with the completed medium (DMEM supple
mented with 10% fetal bovine serum) to concentrations in the range of
7–1919 μg/mL were added to the wells and incubated for 24 h at 37 ◦ C
Fig. 1. Schematic of bubbling fluidised bed reactor for fast pyrolysis. and 5% CO2.
2
X. Xin et al. Food Control 124 (2021) 107874
After the treatment, supernatants were removed, and 10 μL of MTT ECS, Gainesville, FL, USA) was used to analyse the visual attributes of
solution (5 mg/mL of MTT in PBS) was added to each well and incubated the images.
for 4 h. Then, 100 μL of DMSO was added onto the supernatant-drained The colour of each mussel sample was determined by L*a*b* co
cell layer to dissolve the precipitate (formazan product). The absorbance ordinates (Caglak, Cakli, & Kilinc, 2008). The L* coordinate represents
of the supernatant was immediately measured at 540 nm using a the lightness, where it varies from 100 (white) to 0 (black). The a* co
microplate reader (Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO). The anti ordinate represents the colour from red (+a*) to green (-a*), while the
proliferation rate (or inhibition rate or percentage death) was calculated b* coordinate represents the colour from yellow (+b*) to blue (-b*).
according to Equation (1):
2.3.4. Texture profile and water activity analysis
Ac − Ak
Antiproliferation rate (%) = × 100 (1) The texture profile analysis of mussel meat was conducted using a
Ac
Brookfield CT3 Texture Analyzer (USA). A cylindrical flat acrylic probe
where Ak is the absorbance value of the sample group; Ac is the absor (TA5) with a diameter of 12.7 mm was used for compression. The trigger
bance value of the control group. speed of the probe was set at 1.5 mm/s. Samples were compressed on the
The IC50, which is the concentration of liquid smoke that inhibited thickest location twice to 60% of the original thickness. The software,
cell survival by 50%, was obtained using the non-linear regression TextureProCT, automatically acquired the force-deformation data of the
fitting model based on the Four-Parameter Logistic dose-response curve compression and calculated TPA (texture profile analysis) parameters
(Sebaugh, 2011). including hardness (g), cohesiveness, springiness (mm) and chewiness
(mJ).
For water activity, a piece of mussel meat sample was minced and
2.3. Liquid smoke application placed in a plastic dish. Water activity was measured using LabMaster-
aw 111–9971. The plastic dish was placed in the machine chamber,
2.3.1. Liquid smoking of mussel meat and three readings were taken after equilibration was reached at 25 ◦ C.
Fresh New Zealand green lipped mussels were obtained from a local
supermarket in Auckland, New Zealand. The shells were removed, and 2.3.5. Statistical analysis
the mussel meat was washed with distilled water. The samples were then Analyses in this study were conducted in triplicates, and the results
air-dried at room temperature for 10 min. were presented as mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3). Analysis of
The fast pyrolysis liquid smoke was diluted with distilled water to variance (ANOVA) was performed, and the difference between means
concentrations of 5, 10 and 15 vol%. Dilution of liquid smoke is usually was analysed using Duncan’s test. Statistical significance was considered
required before food treatment to soften the flavours. After removing at p < 0.05. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 9.05
mussels’ shells, the meat pieces were dipped in each of the three diluted (Chicago, USA).
liquid smoke samples for 30 s. The liquid smoked mussel meat and non-
smoked as control were vacuum-packed in plastic bags, and there were 3. Results and discussion
three pieces of mussel meat in each bag. Then they were stored in a
refrigerated incubator at 4 ◦ C. The microbiological, colour, texture and 3.1. Fast pyrolysis
water activity analysis was conducted on day 0, day 14 and day 30,
repeatedly. The product distribution of hickory wood fast pyrolysis is presented
in Fig. 2. The products from the fluidised bed reactor in series were
2.3.2. Microbiological analysis biochar, heavy tar, raw liquid smoke, aerosol oil and pyrolytic gas.
Chemicals and media for analysis were peptone water, plate count Biochar was firstly obtained from cyclones 1 and 2 with a yield of 20.5
agar (PCA) and violet red bile glucose agar (VRBGA) from Sigma-Aldrich wt%. The yield of heavy tar collected in condenser 1 was 5.4 wt%. The
(New Zealand). The total viable bacterial counts (TBC) and the raw liquid smoke obtained from condensers 2 and 3 gave the highest
Enterobacteriaceae bacterial counts of treated and non-treated mussel yield of 29.9 wt%. The yields of aerosol oil from gas filter and pyrolytic
meat were determined following a previous study (Siskos, Zotos, Meli gas were 21.4 wt% and 22.8 wt% respectively. Fast pyrolysis was con
dou, & Tsikritzi, 2007). Before analysis, mussel meat samples (25 g) ducted once to produce enough liquid smoke for this research. Previous
were homogenized with 0.1% peptone water (130 g) at room tempera studies have proved that fluidised bed reactors had a good
ture using a laboratory paddle blender (Stomacher 400). Then 1 mL of
each homogenate was transferred to a sterilized Petri dish.
Plate count agar (PCA) was used as the microbiological growth
medium for TBC analysis. Homogenate samples were mixed with 10 mL
of PCA in the Petri dishes and then were incubated at 30 ◦ C for 72 h.
Violet red bile glucose agar (VRBGA) was used as the medium for
Enterobacteriaceae analysis. Homogenate samples were mixed with 10
mL of VRGBA in Petri dishes and then were incubated at 30 ◦ C for 24 h.
Colonies on the Petri dishes were counted after the incubation. The
microbial counts were reported as colony-forming unit per gram (CFU/
g).
3
X. Xin et al. Food Control 124 (2021) 107874
4
X. Xin et al. Food Control 124 (2021) 107874
Fig. 3. Dose-response relationship for fast pyrolysis liquid smoke treatment of L Fig. 4. Images of liquid smoked mussel meat during 30 days refriger
cells for 24 h from MTT assay result (mean ± SD, n = 3). ated storage.
5
X. Xin et al. Food Control 124 (2021) 107874
Table 3 Table 4
Colour coordinates in image analysis of liquid smoked mussel meat during 30 Texture analysis profile of liquid smoked mussel meat during 30 days refriger
days refrigerated storage. ated storage.
Days Non-treated Liquid smoked Days Non-treated Liquid smoked
L Hardness (g)
0 78 ± 5a,A 77 ± 4a,A 76 ± 3a,A 70 ± 5b,A 0 509 ± 54a,A 251 ± 102 ab,A 314 ± 137 ab,A 208 ± 123b,A
14 74 ± 6a,A 70 ± 5b,B 70 ± 5b,A 65 ± 5c,A 14 293 ± 58a,B 334 ± 129a,A 334 ± 116a,A 439 ± 138a,A
30 74 ± 5a,A 69 ± 6 ab,B 70 ± 5 ab,A 65 ± 5b,A 30 299 ± 85a,B 290 ± 135a,A 198 ± 30a,A,A 168 ± 60a,A
a Cohesiveness
0 12 ± 1a,A 12 ± 1a,A 12 ± 1a,A 14 ± 2a,A 0 0.32 ± 0.04a,A 0.39 ± 0.05a,A 0.35 ± 0.03a,A 0.42 ± 0.02a,A
14 14 ± 1a,B 14 ± 2a,A 13 ± 1a,A 15 ± 2a,A 14 0.31 ± 0.02a,A 0.34 ± 0.02 ab,A 0.41 ± 0.04 bc,A 0.48 ± 0.04c,A
30 12 ± 1a,AB 14 ± 1b,A 15 ± 1b,B 15 ± 1b,A 30 0.50 ± 0.07a,B 0.39 ± 0.04 ab,A 0.38 ± 0.03b,A 0.45 ± 0.02 ab,A
b Springiness (mm)
0 8 ± 4a,A 12 ± 4a,A 14 ± 3a,A 16 ± 3a,A 0 3.7 ± 0.9a,A 3.3 ± 0.2a,A 3.4 ± 0.3a,A 3.1 ± 0.5a,A
14 15 ± 3a,A 13 ± 3a,A 15 ± 4a,A 15 ± 2a,A 14 2.3 ± 0.3a,A 3.2 ± 0.5 bc,A 2.9 ± 0.2 ab,AB 3.9 ± 0.3c,A
30 15 ± 3 ab,A 12 ± 4a,A 18 ± 2b,A 14 ± 3 ab,A 30 3.6 ± 0.2a,A 2.7 ± 0.2 ab,A 2.6 ± 0.2b,B 3.2 ± 0.3 ab,A
Chewiness (mJ)
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Means followed by lower 0 8 ± 1a,A 4 ± 2a,A 5 ± 3a,A 3 ± 2a,A
case letter within a row and means followed by same upper case letter within a 14 4 ± 3a,A 6 ± 3a,A 5 ± 2a,A 11 ± 5a,A
column (L, a and b separately) are not significantly different at p < 0.05. 30 6 ± 3a,A 4 ± 3a,A 2 ± 1a,A 3 ± 1a,A
6
X. Xin et al. Food Control 124 (2021) 107874
Estrada-Muñoz, R., Boyle, E. A. E., & Marsden, J. L. (1998). Liquid smoke effects on Mosmann, T. (1983). Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival:
Escherichia coli O157: H7, and its antioxidant properties in beef products. Journal of Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. Journal of Immunological
Food Science, 63(1), 150–153. Methods, 65(1–2), 55–63.
Guillén, M. D., & Ibargoitia, M. L. (1996). Volatile components of aqueous liquid smokes Putnam, K. P., Bombick, D. W., Avalos, J. T., & Doolittle, D. J. (1999). Comparison of the
from Vitis vinifera L shoots and Fagus sylvatica L wood. Journal of the Science of Food cytotoxic and mutagenic potential of liquid smoke food flavourings, cigarette smoke
and Agriculture, 72(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199609) condensate and wood smoke condensate. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 37(11),
72:1<104::AID-JSFA628>3.0.CO;2-J 1113–1118.
Holley, R. A., & Patel, D. (2005). Improvement in shelf-life and safety of perishable foods Sebaugh, J. L. (2011). Guidelines for accurate EC50/IC50 estimation. Pharmaceutical
by plant essential oils and smoke antimicrobials. Food Microbiology, 22(4), 273–292. Statistics, 10(2), 128–134.
Jaeger, J. L., & Acheson, D. W. K. (2000). Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Current Silva, V., Igrejas, G., Falco, V., Santos, T. P., Torres, C., Oliveira, A. M. P., et al. (2018).
Infectious Disease Reports, 2(1), 61. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of phenolic
Kim, S. P., Yang, J. Y., Kang, M. Y., Park, J. C., Nam, S. H., & Friedman, M. (2011). compounds extracted from wine industry by-products. Food Control, 92, 516–522.
Composition of liquid rice hull smoke and anti-inflammatory effects in mice. Journal Simon, R., de la Calle, B., Palme, S., Meier, D., & Anklam, E. (2005). Composition and
of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(9), 4570–4581. https://doi.org/10.1021/ analysis of liquid smoke flavouring primary products. Journal of Separation Science,
jf2003392 28(9–10), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200500009
Kjällstrand, J., & Petersson, G. (2001). Phenolic antioxidants in wood smoke. The Science Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999). [14] Analysis of total
of the Total Environment, 277(1–3), 69–75. phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu
Lakshmanan, R., Piggott, J. R., & Paterson, A. (2003). Potential applications of high reagent. Methods in Enzymology, 299, 152–178.
pressure for improvement in salmon quality. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 14 Siskos, I., Zotos, A., Melidou, S., & Tsikritzi, R. (2007). The effect of liquid smoking of
(9), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(03)00121-3 fillets of trout (Salmo gairdnerii) on sensory, microbiological and chemical changes
Ledesma, E., Rendueles, M., & Díaz, M. (2017). Smoked food. In Current developments in during chilled storage. Food Chemistry, 101(2), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier. foodchem.2006.02.002
Lund, M. N., & Ray, C. A. (2017). Control of Maillard reactions in foods: Strategies and Soldera, S., Sebastianutto, N., & Bortolomeazzi, R. (2008). Composition of phenolic
chemical mechanisms. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 65(23), compounds and antioxidant activity of commercial aqueous smoke flavorings.
4537–4552. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56(8), 2727–2734. https://doi.org/
Maga, J. A. (2009). The flavor chemistry of wood smoke. Food Reviews International, 9129 10.1021/jf072117d
(1987), 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559128709540810 Tan, T., Wu, J., Wang, Y., & Teng, J. (2017). Spoilage profiles of green-lipped mussel
Maga, J. A. (2018). Smoke in food processing. CRC Press. Perna viridis. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 41(5), Article e13106.
Manu, R., & Sangsrichan, S. (2009). Evaluation of antioxidation and radical scavenging Tiilikkala, K., Fagernäs, L., & Tiilikkala, J. (2010). History and use of wood pyrolysis
activities in pyroligneous acid samples. In Pure and applied chemistry international liquids as biocide and plant protection product. The Open Agriculture Journal, (4),
conference (pp. 51–53). 111–118.
Martin, E. M., Bryan, C. A. O., Lary, R. Y., Griffis, C. L., Vaughn, K. L. S. S., Marcy, J. A., Underwood, G., & Graham, R. G. (1989). Method of using fast pyrolysis liquids as liquid
et al. (2010). Spray application of liquid smoke to reduce or eliminate Listeria smoke. U.S. Patent, 4(876), 108.
monocytogenes surface inoculated on frankfurters. Meat Science, 85(4), 640–644. Vidal, N. P., Goicoechea, E., Manzanos, M. J., & Guillén, M. D. (2017). Effect of smoking
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.03.017 using smoke flavorings on several characteristics of farmed sea bass (Dicentrarchus
Martinez, O., Salmeron, J., Guillen, M. D., & Casas, C. (2004). Texture profile analysis of labrax) fillets and on their evolution during vacuum-packed storage at refrigeration
meat products treated with commercial liquid smoke flavourings. Food Control, 15 temperature. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 41(2), 1–15. https://doi.
(6), 457–461. org/10.1111/jfpp.12800
Martinez, O., Salmerón, J., Guillén, M., & Casas, C. (2007). Textural and physicochemical Xin, X., Torr, K. M., Mercader, F. D. M., Pang, S., De Miguel Mercader, F., & Pang, S.
changes in salmon (Salmo salar) treated with commercial liquid smoke flavourings. (2019a). Insights into preventing fluidized bed material agglomeration in fast
Food Chemistry, 100(2), 498–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.09.071 pyrolysis of acid-leached pine wood. Energy & Fuels, 33(5), 4254–4263. https://doi.
Martinez, O., Salmerón, J., Guillén, M. D., & Casas, C. (2011). Characteristics of dry- and org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b04178
brine-salted salmon later treated with liquid smoke flavouring. Agricultural and Food Xin, X., Torr, K. M., Pang, S., van de Pas, D., Cooke-Willis, M., & de Miguel Mercader, F.
Science, 20(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.2137/145960611797471543 (2019b). Catalytic fast pyrolysis of demineralized biomass in a fluidized bed reactor:
Ma, C., Song, K., Yu, J., Yang, L., Zhao, C., Wang, W., et al. (2013). Pyrolysis process and Effects of acid-leaching and torrefaction pretreatments. Energy & Fuels, 34(1),
antioxidant activity of pyroligneous acid from Rosmarinus officinalis leaves. Journal 568–578.
of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 104, 38–47. Yang, J.-F., Yang, C.-H., Liang, M.-T., Gao, Z.-J., Wu, Y.-W., & Chuang, L.-Y. (2016).
Michailof, C., Sfetsas, T., Stefanidis, S., Kalogiannis, K., Theodoridis, G., & Lappas, A. Chemical composition, antioxidant, and antibacterial activity of wood vinegar from
(2014). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin Litchi chinensis. Molecules, 21(9), 1150.
bio-oils by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight Yuniningsih, S., & Anggraini, S. P. A. (2013). Characterization of liquid smoke from
mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1369, 147–160. coconut shell to be applicated as safe food preservatives for human health. Journal of
Montazeri, N., Oliveira, A. C. M., Himelbloom, B. H., Leigh, M. B., & Crapo, C. A. (2013). Agriculture and Food Technology, 3(2), 1–5.
Chemical characterization of commercial liquid smoke products. Food Sciences and Zachara, A., Gałkowska, D., & Juszczak, L. (2017). Contamination of smoked meat and
Nutrition, 1(1), 102–115. fish products from Polish market with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Food
Control, 80, 45–51.