Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Importance of Subscale Jet Engine Testing
The Importance of Subscale Jet Engine Testing
com
The Importance of
Subscale Jet Engine Testing
The Importance of Subscale Jet Engine Testing 2
The Importance of
Subscale Jet Engine Testing
Aerospace engineers are rapidly advancing the state of technology by pushing the
envelopes of both performance and efficiency in jet engine manufacturing. As increased
levels of competition add pressure to accelerate the pace of development, engineers are
also faced with the task of adhering to strict safety and environmental emissions standards.
During the development of advanced aerospace structures and materials, access to
relevant test data that can be used to validate numerical models significantly improves
engineers’ chances of both first article success and overall confidence in their designs.
During the course of jet engine development, different engineering tests with varying
degrees of “realism”, are employed by engineers to study and generate that necessary
design data. The most commonly known and used testing methods are the Gas Burner &
Torch testing and Full Scale Jet Engine testing – both of which have limitations.
Preparing a test engine requires careful modification to the engine to allow for instrumentation, the
fitting of test parts, and the use of non-standard operating protocols within the testing (ex. overriding
the built-in safety features). The complexity of the project, estimated timelines, and costs pile up
quickly. The number of tests is also limited to the number of component copies that are available.
When it comes to a totally new engine in the design and development stage, a full-scale engine test
is simply not an option – the physical engine does not exist. In the very best case scenario, testing
would be performed by a surrogate engine, which would contain varying degrees of difference from
the engine in development.
Full-scale jet engine testing facilities are often privately owned, which can present various issues
and inconveniences for engineers who are seeking to test on the small-scale. Below are two of the
most common issues:
Many burner and torch type test rigs require compressed air, which will necessitate higher costs and
limit the duration of sustained test. Burners are also typically limited to a small unit, resulting in a
limited flow rate.
Depending on the specific application – for example, when testing sensors for engine hot sections –
burners and torches can only achieve limited effect. Simulating the combustion section of an engine
require both relevant temperature, pressure and combustion process. Sub scale jet engine rigs are
not bound to these constraints, and offer a higher flow rate in terms of both quality and quantity.
With the use of an actual engine, these subscale jet engine facilities can reliably and economically
simulate the relevant environment of a full-scale jet engine facility. Due to size alone, subscale engine
tests require significantly lower costs and less labor to prepare for a test than a full-scale testing. They
also allow greater flexibility and access for engineers to instrument for data, change configurations,
iterate, and learn from the test in a “trial-and-error” manner before investing in full-scale jet engine
testing operations.
Testing capabilities will vary depending on the specific small testing rig being utilized, but all of these
scaled-down facilities allow engineers to gather valuable data to tune their numerical models and
measure the number of data needed for studying the probability of failure.
The data and learning from the test would boost the confidence in the designs and engineering
decisions made in the earlier part of the jet engine development – ultimately resulting in significant
time and cost savings down the line.
Even if a full-scale jet engine facility was available, and money was not an issue, a full-scale jet
engine testing would have been impractical for this test. To implement the test, the team would have
needed to construct a new purpose-designed test rig in which the test specimen (matched to the
size of a full-size engine) would require a crane to handle. Doing so would not only take a much
longer time to assemble, but would also incur extremely high costs.
As a solution, a subscale engine test rig was developed and set up by Test Devices, the rig allowed
for the use of smaller tile specimen that could be handled and installed by hand. During the
course of the test, the client reviewed the data and observed something new and unexpected. The
observations led to a need for an additional set of tests with new instrumentation as well as some
rig settings adjustments. The subscale jet engine rig allowed for quick adjustments, and the new
tests were set up and implemented in a matter of hours. The subscale engine rig offers the clients
superb convenience and a significantly more economical testing solution.
• Easy customization - Because subscale engine rigs are subject to far fewer constraints
than full-scale testing, a unique test setups can be built quickly and adjusted as needed. In
typical testing, the needs for in-situ changes often rises – Subscale engine rigs allow for great
operational flexibility. With full-scale engine tests, on the other hand, layouts often allow very
limited changes and engineers operates under stricter timing constraints.
• Fuller test data - Unlike full-scale testing, subscale jet engine testing is not constrained by the
established test method and data from the past. This allows engineers and designers a greater
freedom to test and measure data as they needed - enhancing fullness of the experiment and
the measured data set.
• Fuller understanding - Due to the purpose designed boundary conditions, the data from
the subscale test are easier to compare with the model and gain critical understanding of the
phenomenon of interest. In a full-scale test, defining the boundary conditions and interpreting the
data would be a much more challenging task. Subscale engine test data allow engineers to build
confidence in their models and design decisions from ground up.
• Ability to test to failure — Unlike full-scale jet engine rigs, the subscale engine setups allow
engineers to conduct test to failures. Below are just a few of the various failure mechanisms that
can be tested:
• Shorter timelines — While full-scale testing can take years, subscale rig testing can be
completed in just months, keeping down costs and speeding up all related processes. Custom
design usually takes around one or two months, and manufacturing generally requires about
two months. Subscale jet engine tests themselves usually require about two weeks for full
assessments, depending on the number and complexity of the tests required.
Highly cost- and time-efficient, the realistic engine conditions created in subscale jet engine testing
allow engineers to accurately assess the reliability of turbine and combustion design, as well as the
performance of rotors and other critical components.
To learn more about the benefits of small jet engine testing and how it can help ensure top
performance and longevity, reach out to the expert team at Test Devices.