Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Structure of Globalization Handouts (Autorecovered)
The Structure of Globalization Handouts (Autorecovered)
The Structure of Globalization Handouts (Autorecovered)
GOVERNANCE
Objectives
_____________________________________________________________________________
1. To define the Global Governance
2. To identify the Challenges of Global Governance in the Twenty-first Century
3. To discuss the The Role of the Nation State in Globalization
4. To explain the Globalizations Impact on the State
The modern question of world governance exists in the context of globalization and
globalizing regimes of power: politically, economically and culturally.
Global governance can be thus understood as the sum of laws, norms, policies, and
institutions that define, constitute, and mediate trans-border relations between states,
cultures, citizens, intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations, and the market.
It embraces the totality of institutions, policies, rules practices, norms, procedures, and
initiatives by which states and citizens try to bring more predictability, stability, and
order to their responses to transnational challenges-such as climate change and
environmental degradation, nuclear proliferation, and terrorism which go beyond the
capacity of a single state to solve.
The United Nations (UN) in the world of politics has the roles of preventing and
managing conflicts, regulating armaments, championing human rights and international
humanitarian law, liberating the colonized, providing economic and technical aid in
newly liberated countries, organizing elections, empowering women, educating children,
feeding the hungry, sheltering the disposed and displaced, housing the refugees, tending
the sick and coordinating disaster relief and assistance.
There were five stages or main gaps meet by UN in the 21st century. These are
knowledge, norms. policy, institutions and compliance. A critical hole in any of the five
stages can cause efforts at problem solving to collapse.
Within states the first trajectory or path is the depoliticization which can be observed in
the form of delegating decisions to independent regulators and experts, central banks, or
judiciaries.
A second trajectory is the rescaling of economic and social relations well beyond the
territorial boundaries of nation states, facilitated by transnational legal arrangements that
have their roots in national law is also a critical ingredient for transforming real assets
into commodities and ultimately financial assets, that is, the third path which is the
capitalization of assets.
Different effects are expected on different constituencies within and across domestic
polities (an organized society, a state as a political entity). Direct participation or
inclusion in these processes are benefitted by some though others face exclusion.
Considered important for effective governance include recognition of these paths or
trajectories and their potentially databasing effects for polities.
States like Russia, Canada, U.S.A., India, China, Brazil and some others are large
sized states whereas Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldivies, Switzerland, Togo,
Brundi and many others are States with small territories. The whole territory of
the state is under the sovereignty or supreme power of the State. All persons,
organizations, associations, institutions and places located within its territory are
under the sovereign jurisdiction of the State.
This sometimes creates the impression that there is no difference between the
State and Government. However, it must be clearly noted that government is just
one element of the State. It is the agent or the working agency of the State.
Sovereignty belongs to the State; the government only uses it on behalf of the
State.
State has the exclusive title and prerogative to exercise supreme power over all
its people and territory. In fact, Sovereignty is the basis on which the State
regulates all aspects of the life of the people living in its territory.
As the supreme power of the State, Sovereignty has two dimensions: Internal
Sovereignty and External Sovereignty.
We can define external sovereignty of the State as its sovereign equality with
every other state. State voluntarily accepts rules of international law. These
cannot be forced upon the State. India is free to sign or not to sign any treaty with
any other state. No state can force it to do so.
The State persists because its need grows and because of its undiminished local resource
pools and socioeconomic problems on which States are based. The State remains the key
actor in the domestic as well as international arenas and that States which are effective
are essential for both tasks, and their capacity for both needs strengthening.
The following can be guaranteed only by the States through independent courts:
1. Respect of human rights and justice
2. Promote the national welfare
3. Protect the general interest
The State has the roles in operating the intricate web of multi-lateral arrangements and
inter-governmental regimes, enter into agreements with other States, make policies
which shape national and global activities, agenda of integration by clearly pronouncing
the problem of capacity inadequacy of individual States. This indicates political leverage
of some States in shaping the international agenda while developing countries have
fewer active roles.
It should also be responsible for adopting policies, which are conducive to greater
economic integration not forgetting that further global integration can be reversed by
state policies inimical to openness, as occurred between the two World Wars which
means that globalization does not reduce the role of the nation-State, but redefines it
given the pressures and responses it must give at the local, national and international
levels.