Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mud Concrete Slab
Mud Concrete Slab
net/publication/355145876
CITATIONS READS
0 16
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Rohantha Jayasinghe on 08 October 2021.
KINGDOM
214
8th International Symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering
Practices for Sustainable Development (ACEPS – 2021)
3. SHELL GEOMETRY
215
8th International Symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering
Practices for Sustainable Development (ACEPS – 2021)
For the construction, a 1.0 m width of Bamboo props at a 450mm spacing were
vault section was selected. used to support the formwork. 400 mm heigh
sideboards were fixed and levelled, so the
mixture could be poured to achieve the
5.1. Formwork desired floor level. Thereafter, a thick paste of
grease and oil was applied over the curved
Formwork was designed based on the formwork and sideboards, as a release agent.
deflection of the formwork material and the
deflection under the self-weight of the poured
concrete omit the deformations underside of 5.4. Placement of Tie Rods
the slab. Thus, with the calculation formwork
spacing of 330 mm was chosen. The joists were Two tie rods (6mm in diameter) were
cut into arch profile to get the corrected shape placed to resist the horizontal thrust
of the formwork (see Figure (i)). The top generated. To resist the punching load failure
surface was formed with 5mm thick plywood at the wall-tie connection, a 50 mm x 50 mm x
board (see Figure 4 (ii)). 4 mm angle sections were used, and ties were
fixed to the wall with nuts and bolts as shown
in Figure 6.
(i) (ii)
Figure 4 (i) Skeleton of the formwork and
(ii) completed formwork
216
8th International Symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering
Practices for Sustainable Development (ACEPS – 2021)
• Fine (extracted from the soil) - 5% the mud-concrete mixture was poured into the
• Water - 20% mid-section of the formwork (see Figure 8i)
• Cement - 4% and levelled the surface (see Figure 8ii).
To achieve self-compacting concrete
properties, water content is to be kept at 20%
of the dry mix (Arooz, 2019). Additionally, a 5.7. Curing and Removal of Formwork
water-reducing admixture was added (1% by
weight of cementitious materials) to achieve Wet gunny bags were placed on top of the
adequate workability. finished surface when the surface was
Gravel, sand and cement were first mixed hardened enough. Sideboards were removed
thoroughly with half of the water requirement. after 24 hours and curing was carried out for
Then the remaining water and fine particles 21 days, using wet gunny bags and spraying.
were added, along with the water reducing Figure 9 shows the slab system after 24 hours
admixture. Mixture was thoroughly mixed to of casting.
obtain a consistent fluid mud-concrete.
After curing, the structure was kept dry
for another 7 days. As the initial step in the
5.6. Pouring the Mud-Concrete into the formwork removal process, all the props were
Formwork and Levelling the Surface loosened and formwork was decentered
carefully without applying sudden or
The prepared mud-concrete mixture is asymmetric loads. The completed slab system
then poured on top of the formwork. Initially, and bottom face of the slab system are shown
an equal quantity of mixture was poured at the in Figures 10 and 11, respectively.
near supports, and compacted with a tamping
rod. This is to ensure that the stresses
generated during the construction are at a
minimum (see Figure 7).
(i) (ii)
217
8th International Symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering
Practices for Sustainable Development (ACEPS – 2021)
5.8. Prototype Load Testing three different structural forms are, (i)
conventional reinforced concrete slab; (ii)
For easy identification of crack formation, singly-curved earthen slab system; (iii) singly
one side of the vault was painted in white. curved mass concrete slab. Total cost was
loading was gradually applied over the calculated to build the above slab systems for
surface to identify whether it satisfy the design 1m x 1m footprint area. All the rates were
criteria. Cement blocks, each weighing calculated from the Building Schedule of Rates
approximately 13.6kg, were used for loading. (BSR-2019/2020) in accordance with CIDA
Each cement block was carefully placed on the regulations in Sri Lanka. Table 1 shows the
slab surface to cover the whole area and cost comparison of the three slab systems. The
gradually increased the loading by stacking labour cost constitutes that for the
cement blocks in layers. construction as well as the material
preparation: e.g., drying and sieving of soil.
Initial crack was observed after stacking
45 blocks: three layers of cement blocks, each
layer consisting of 15 blocks. This corresponds Table 1 Cost comparison of three different
to a uniformly distributed load of 6.08 kN/m2 slab systems
(see Figures 12i and 12ii). The crack was
observed at the bottom mid-span of the vault, Singly- Singly-
where the thickness is minimum. With the R.C.C. curved curved
loading direction, the crack pattern was slab earthe concrete
identified as a tensile crack. system n slab slab
system system
Materials
Filling
6424.97 1646.88 6424.97
material
Reinforceme
3321.74 580.00 580.00
(i) nt
Raw
material
N/A 680.00 N/A
Preparation
& Sieving
Formwork 3024.66 3562.85 3562.85
Labour cost 2064.52 2419.72 1599.52
Total cost
14835.88 8889.45 12167.34
per sq.m
Cost 0% 40% 18%
reduction
(ii)
Figure 12 (i) Initial crack was observed Production and construction stage were
when 45 blocks were placed on top of the considered for embodied energy calculations
slab system (ii) Initial tension crack at the (Gibbons and Orr, 2020)(Udawattha et al.,
mid-section 2016b). 25km and 50km distance to source
were assumed for soil and cement
transportation, respectively, considering local
6. COST COMPARISON conditions. (Fay and Raniga, 2000; Jayasinghe,
2011). These may vary based on where the
For three different slab systems, total cost construction was done: Soil was obtained from
and embodied energy were calculated. The
218
8th International Symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering
Practices for Sustainable Development (ACEPS – 2021)
219
8th International Symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering
Practices for Sustainable Development (ACEPS – 2021)
Galabada, H., Halwatura, R.U., 2019. A Walker, P., Keable, R., Martin, J., Maniatidis,
preliminary study on the use of soil as a floor V., 2005. Rammed earth: design and
finishing material, in: 2019 From Innovation to construction guidelines. Watford: BRE.
Impact, FITI 2019. Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1109/FITI49428.2019.9037
635.
220