Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mechanical, Thermal and Dielectric Properties of Cross-Linked Polyethylene Nanocomposites Corrected
Mechanical, Thermal and Dielectric Properties of Cross-Linked Polyethylene Nanocomposites Corrected
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL
The cross linked polyethylene and cross – linking agent used in this work was KLJ-
XL-01 (KLJ Polymers& Chemicals Ltd.) and the nanoclay used was Nanomer 1.30E
(25-30 wt% of Octyldecyl amine salt and d 001: 20.29 nm, Sigma Aldrich). To prepare
XLPE – nanoclay composites polyethylene pellets, crosslinking agent and nanoclay
was mixed in Haake Rheocord 90 at 60 rpm and 190°C temperature for 20 minutes.
The nanocomposites were cured in a water bath at 90 ⁰C for three hours and molded
in hydraulic compression press at 175 kg/cm 2 and 200°C. Morphological studies
were performed on Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer (Cu X-ray beam of
wavelength 1.5406 A°) at 3°/minute and Park system XE70 atomic force microscope.
Tensile properties were evaluated as per ASTM D638 (Type 5) method on a UTM at
crosshead speed of 50 mm/min. Samples were heat aged at 100 0C for 48 hours and
tested for mechanical properties. Perkin Elmer, Diamond TG/DTA and on Toledo
DSC 822e were used for thermal properties at heating rate of 10°C / min. The
dielectric constant (relative permittivity) and dissipation factor (tan δ) were evaluated
using ASTM D150 standards.
Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern for XLPE nanocomposites. For the organomodified -
nanoclay the peak occurs at 2θ of 4.334 corresponding to d spacing of 20.41 nm.
For XLPE nanocomposites, absence of peaks indicated that the nanoclay was
exfoliated in the polymer8. The appearance of small peak at 2θ of 6.7 for 7.5 and
10% nanoclay indicated intercalation and slight agglomeration. AFM images of neat
XLPE showed relatively smooth surface. Figure 2 shows the AFM image of
XLPENC7.5 and it can be noted from the different colored peaks corresponing to
different heights that nanoclay was exfoliated with formation of few agglomerates 9.
Fig 1. XRD pattern for XLPE nanocomposites Fig 2. AFM image for XLPEN7.5
The mechanical properties of XLPE nanoclay composites before and after ageing
are tabulated in Table 1. In XLPE nanocomposites, the tensile strength increased
with increase in the nanoclay content from 0 to 5% after which there was a slight
decrease. There was significant increase in the modulus with the increasing
nanoclay loading confirming the reinforcing effect of nanoclay which can be
attributed to the exfoliation of nanoclay that resulted in larger surface area and better
interfacial interaction with XLPE matrix8,10. The reduction in tensile strength at higher
nanoclay content is due to the formation of intercalated structures and
agglomerates8. As nanoclay Restriction of polymer chain mobility by nanoclay
decreased elongation. It was observed after heat ageing the tensile strength and
modulus of the nanocomposites increased due to the continued curing while
elongation decreased making them more rigid and stiffer. As the percentage change
in properties after ageing decreased with increase in nanoclay content, it may be
concluded that nanoclay improved the ageing behavior of XLPE.
The variation of dielectric constant and tan δ of the XLPE nanocomposites are
shown in Figure 3. The dielectric constant and tan δ for all nanocomposites with
varying compositions of nanoclay show the same trend as shown in figure 3. The
tortuous path induced by nanoclay slows the propagation of electrical current and
hence the dielectric constant decreased with increase in the nanoclay content and
enhanced the insulating property of XLPE 11. The slight increase at 10% may be due
to possible agglomeration. Addition of nanoclay decreased the loss factor at
intermediate frequencies whereas it increased at low frequencies.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
1. Pavlidou S., Papaspyrides C.D., Prog. Polym. Sci. 33, 1119 (2008)
2. Hu H., Onyebueke L, Abatan A, J. of Minerals & Materials Characterization &
Engg, 9, 275 (2010)
3. Kango S., Kalia S., Celli A, Njuguna J, Habibi Y, Kumar R, Prog. Polym. Sci., 38,
1232 (2013)
4. Crosby A. J., Lee J, Polym Rev, 47, 217 (2007)
5. Mauseth, F. ; Amundsen, M. ; Lind, A. ; Faremo, H., Electrical Insulation and
Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP), 2012 Annual Report Conference, Montreal, QC
Montreal, 692 (2012)
6. Fabiani, D. ; DIE, Univ. of Bologna, Bologna, Italy ; Cavallini, A. ; Montanari, G.C. ;
Saccani, Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP), 2012 Annual
Report Conference, Montreal, QC Montreal, 315 (2012)
7. Lau, Yiew K., Piah, M. A. M., Malaysian Polymer Journal, 6 , 58 (2011)
8. Balachandran M., Bhagawan S.S., J. Compos. Mater., 45, 2011, (2011).
9. Sadhu S., Bhowmick A. K., J. Mater. Sci., 40, 1633, (2005)
10. Kim J., Lee D., Oh T and Lee D., J Appl Polym Sci, 89,2633 (2003)
11. Park J., Lee J., Mater. Chem. Phys., 141, 776 (2013)