Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.2 Discipline 2: Time Management: 3.2.1 Activity Definition and Sequencing
3.2 Discipline 2: Time Management: 3.2.1 Activity Definition and Sequencing
3.2 Discipline 2: Time Management: 3.2.1 Activity Definition and Sequencing
Activity Sequencing – Identifying the relationships that exist among the various schedule activities.
Activity Resource Estimating – Allocating the type and quantity of resources available/required to
perform each schedule activity.
Activity Duration Estimating – Estimating the time required to complete project activities.
85
Page
Returning to the Delta River Project case study, Figure 22 provides a partial build out of a network
diagram for the latrine construction component of the project. Note, that the diagram in Figure 22 is
incomplete, because units of time still need to be inserted below each of the project activities.
Each of the boxes in the network diagram identifies an activity in the scope of the project. These boxes
are connected by arrows that indicate their dependencies. These dependencies identify how project
activities relate to each other within the context of the calendar and the sequence through which the
activities need to be completed. In some cases, the sequence of activities boxes is linear, implying a
precedence relationship which requires that one activity be completed before another can begin. Other
boxes are on parallel paths and can be sequenced independently of each other.
Some of the messages that can be interpreted from the design of the latrine project network diagram
include:
- The project team must wait for the latrine cap to be built before it can be installed.
- The project team does not need to await completion of the latrine cap before digging the latrine
hole.
The training activities can be completed independently of the latrine construction activities. NOTE: If
training was required as a prerequisite for participating in construction activities, then the TRAIN
COMMUNITY BOX would need to be placed on a different path than to where it is currently located.
In short, resources matter. They are one of the central factors influencing the project duration
estimates. Therefore, resource decisions need to be made before duration estimates can be made.
86
Page
Decisions relating to the number and quality of resources committed to an activity, in turn, are
contingent on a number of factors, including (but not limited to) the following:
Time – If there is a very tight timeframe, the project may choose to dedicate high levels of staff,
materials and capital equipment to meet time constraints. Conversely, if the timeframe is loose, the
project may choose to dedicate lower levels of resources allocated to an activity.
Budget – If money is in short supply, the project might choose to invest in a ‘low cost’ resource mix. For
example, more manual workers and less machinery are a preferable low-cost alternative. This resource
decision, however, will extend the duration of the latrine excavation activities.
Regulations and Organizational Policies – Often projects are constrained by labor laws and/or internal
organizational policies that limit work schedules (hours per day, days per week, holidays per year, family
leave policies). These constraints influence resource availability and consequently duration estimates.
Other Factors that Influence Resource Availability – A number of other factors influence resource
availability, and thereby will influence activity duration estimates. Some examples of these factors
include:
Material Constraints impede a housing project which requires scarce construction materials,
making it necessary to adopt an alternative strategy that is more time consuming.
Logistics Constraints impede an emergency relief project from accessing transport, extending
the time required to fill food warehouses.
Human Resources Constraints impede a health project from accessing qualified labor, extending
duration estimates for technically complex activities.
Figure 23: Network Diagram for the Delta River Project Latrines Component
87
Page
Now the network diagram is complete and can be used to help the project team identify:
The Project’s Critical Path – The critical path is the series of tasks that determines the minimum
amount of time required to complete project activities. In Figure 24, the critical path is the
series of darkly shaded tasks. Why this sequence of activities? Because this sequence of tasks
represents the longest path between the project’s start and its end - in this case 23 days. In this
example, the critical path is telling us that it is impossible to complete the project in less time
than 23 days UNLESS the other constraints in the project constraint triangle are changed
(money/resources or scope/quality).
Figure 24: Network Diagram for the Delta River Project Latrines Component – Critical Path
The Project Float (or Slack) – In project management, float or slack is the amount of time that a
task in a project network diagram can be delayed by without causing a delay to the project
completion date. In the latrine example, there is zero float on the critical path. However, the
‘Build Latrine Cap’ activity could be delayed by up to eight days without impacting the project
schedule. Similarly, the training activities could be delayed by up to 20 days without impacting
the project schedule. If a project activity that is not on the critical path is delayed beyond the
late start date, this could mean that the critical path determined in the project plan is no longer
the critical path.
The complexity and comprehensiveness of the Gantt chart will vary. At its core, the Gantt chart tool has
the advantage of being relatively easy to prepare, read and to use. However, it is important to recognize
that the tasks of a project can be quite complex and many dependencies can exist between them.
88
Page
One way to retain simplicity in the Gantt chart even when tasks and dependencies are complex, involves
rolling up the broader, more comprehensive activities of a project into a summary Gantt Chart, with
details being further elaborated on a detailed schedule.
The Summary Gantt Chart will not only differ from the detailed Gantt Chart with regard to the level of
detail, but also with regard to its purpose. The summary Gantt Chart will be especially helpful when
discussing the high-level progress of the project with stakeholders (project board members, key
stakeholders, donors, etc.) The purpose of the detailed Gantt chart, however, will be less focused on
high-level communication and much more focused on the operational planning, implementation and
monitoring of activities. Here, the audience will focus on the project team and the implementing
partners and suppliers responsible for completing project work packages and tasks.
In this example, the work packages, tasks and subtasks are on the y-axis, and the time line is on the x-
axis. The bars show when a task should start and when it will be finished. The outlined boxes provide
the summary roll up schedule for the work package. Darker bars show tasks which have been
completed. Light cell bars show work which still must be done. Note that this Gantt chart is designed to
be updated, providing the project team with a tool not only to indicate what activities are planned for
which months, but also providing a visual tool to track which project activities are completed (and which
are not).
Figure 25: Gantt Chart for Latrines Project (limited build out)
In the Latrine Project Gantt Chart, the table was built using a computer program. While this is
frequently the case in development project, other tools could also be used. For example, often Gantt
Charts are drawn by hand, either on paper or on white boards that are retained in the project office.
Another option for developing and managing Gantt Charts is employing project management software
programs like Microsoft Project or any of dozens of other programs on the commercial market.
89
Page
There are many factors that should be considered when deciding which tool to use to develop the Gantt
Chart. Some of these criteria include:
Often, the overriding criteria that development organizations consider when making decisions are points
one and two in the list above. The reality is that project teams in the development sector tend to lack
access to project management software or the skills to use these software programs. For this reason,
project teams tend to manage their projects by hand or by using word processing and spreadsheet
programs.
This decision is reasonable; however, it is important to acknowledge that as projects increase in their
level of complexity and risk, the commercial project management software programs include advanced
features that are especially helpful. For example, Gantt Charts made in project management software
programs include features that allow project teams to:
• Identify linkages between project dependencies – automatically identifying what tasks must be
completed before others can be started. Furthermore, identifying when changes to the
completion of one task will lead to delays in the initiation of other activities.
• Track activities along the critical path – automatically flagging when delays in activities along
the critical path threaten to delay the overall timeline of the project schedule.
• Link the project Gantt Chart to other critical project management document – automatically
identifying when changes to the project Gantt Chart require that integrated changes be made to
other project documents like the project Budget and the project Work Breakdown Structure.
However, if the project deadlines are fixed and the project scope cannot be changed, it may not be
possible for the project to get back on track through the typical schedule management techniques. As
an alternative, in scenarios where the scope and calendar are inflexible, two alternative techniques to
consider are fast tracking and crashing.
“Fast tracking” a project schedule involves taking activities that would normally be completed in
sequence and instead completing them in parallel. To make the most of fast-tracking, project teams
90
Page