Design of Bevel Gear Pair PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 21

Design of bevel Gear

Pair
Prof Sumit Suresh Malusare
Finolex Academy Of Management and Technology, Ratnagiri

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Design Bevel gear pair for following Particular's
• Power to be transmitted -: 10 KW
• Input speed -: 960 rpm
• Output speed (approximate) -: 250 rpm

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Designed Power
• Assuming application as Rotary air
Compressor with 8 to 10 hours duty per
day
• Hence Service Factor = 1.1 -----PSG 7.69
• [P] = P X SF
[P] = 10 X 1.1
= 11 KW

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


General Assumptions
• Gear tooth Profile-: Involute/Cycloidal → • Involute
1° • 20° Full Depth
• Pressure angle ( α )-:
142 , 15° ,20° ,25° →
• Gear Grades-: Grade 1 to 12 → • Carefully Cut
Gears(5-6)
• Sn Gearing( a = m)
• Type of Gearing-: S, Sn, So →
• Straight
• Type of Bevel Gear → Straight, Spiral

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Reduction Ratio and Number of stages
𝑁𝑖
• 𝑖𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙 =
𝑁0
• Reduction ratio per stage is
limited up to 5 for Straight Bevel
gear pair
960
• = = 3.84
250
• 3.84 < 5
• Hence we go for single stage
reduction unit

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Determination of semi cone angles
• 𝜃𝑠 = 𝜃𝑃1 + 𝜃𝑃2 • Since shaft angle not given we
−1 sin 𝜃𝑆 assume as 90°
• 𝜃𝑃1 = tan
𝑖 +cos 𝜃𝑆 • i = 3.84
• 𝜃𝑆 - : Shaft Angle • 𝜃𝑃1 = 14.5965°
• 𝜃𝑃1 −: Pitch Angle of Pinion
• 𝜃𝑃2 = 75.4035°
• 𝜃𝑃2 −: Pitch Angle of Gear wheel

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Number of Teeth to avoid Interference
2
• As per AGMA • 𝑍𝑉 = = 17.09 ≈ 18
2𝑎Τ𝑚 sin2 20
• 𝑍𝑉 = 2 • But these are nothing but teeth on spur
sin 𝛼
• We have consider Sn gear
𝑍
gearing( a = m) • 18 =
2 𝑐𝑜𝑠 14.5965
𝑍𝑉 = • Z = 17.41 ≈ 18
sin2 𝛼 • It means For Bevel Gear 18 teeth are
𝒁
• 𝒁𝑽 = 𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝜽 sufficient on pinion.
𝑷 𝑍2
• 3.84 = 18 → 𝑍2 =69.12 ≈70
𝑍2 • Hence 𝑖𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑐𝑡 = 3.89 for further
•𝑖= 𝑍1 calculations

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Recalculation of Exact semi cone angles
• 𝜃𝑠 = 𝜃𝑃1 + 𝜃𝑃2 • Since shaft angle not given we
−1 sin 𝜃𝑆 assume as 90°
• 𝜃𝑃1 = tan
𝑖 +cos 𝜃𝑆 • 𝑖𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑐𝑡 = 3.89
• 𝜃𝑆 - : Shaft Angle • 𝜃𝑃1 = 14.4168°
• 𝜃𝑃1 −: Pitch Angle of Pinion
• 𝜃𝑃2 = 75.5832°
• 𝜃𝑃2 −: Pitch Angle of Gear wheel

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Designed Torque
• 𝑃 =
2𝜋𝑁 𝑀𝑡 • 𝑀𝑡1 = 109419.0234 N.mm
60
• 𝑀𝑡2 = 425640.0009 N.mm
• Where
• 𝑃 -: Designed power = 11 KW
• 𝑁1 = 960 rpm
𝑁1 960
• 𝑁2 = = = 246.78 rpm
𝑖𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑐𝑡 3.89

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Determination of Virtual Number of teeth
• 𝒁𝑽 =
𝒁 • 𝑍𝑉1 =18.5852
𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝜽𝑷
• 𝑍𝑉2 =281.1539
• 𝑍1 = 18
• 𝑍2 = 70
• 𝜃𝑃1 = 14.4168°
• 𝜃𝑃2 = 75.5832°

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Lewis Form factor
• 𝑌𝑉 = 𝜋 0.154 −
0.912
--PSG 8.50 • 𝑌𝑉1 = 0.3296
𝑍𝑉
• 𝑌𝑉2 = 0.4736
For 20° full depth involute teeth

• 𝑍𝑉1 = 18.5852
• 𝑍𝑉2 = 281.1539

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Material Selection Material [𝝈𝒃 ] [𝝈𝒄 ]
• This time we go with material (N/𝒎𝒎𝟐 ) (N/𝒎𝒎𝟐 )

pairs given on PSG 8.04 as


Pinion 40Ni2Cr1Mo28 400 1100
• Pinion -:40Ni2Cr1Mo28
• Gear wheel-:15Ni2Cr1Mo15 Gear 15Ni2Cr1Mo15 320 950
• Now with Reference to PSG 1.05 Wheel

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Determination of Weaker Element
• Beam Strength 𝐹𝑏 = 𝜎𝑏 b𝑌𝑣 1 − 𝑏Τ𝑅 𝑚𝑡 ---PSG 8.52
• For meshing gears module, face width and cone radius should remain
same hence Strength factor is
• 𝐹 = 𝜎𝑏 × 𝑌𝑣
• 𝜎𝑏1 = 400 𝑁Τ𝑚𝑚2 𝜎𝑏2 = 320 𝑁Τ𝑚𝑚2
• 𝑌𝑉1 = 0.3296 𝑌𝑉2 = 0.4736
• 𝐹1 = 131.84 𝐹2 = 151.552
𝐹1 < 𝐹2
Hence pinion is weaker and we go for design of Pinion
Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri
Module Estimation
• We go for design for bending and check against wear, Average module
is given by
3 𝑀𝑡
• 𝑚𝑎𝑣 ≥ 1.28 ---PSG 8.13
𝑌𝑣 𝜎𝑏 𝜑𝑚 𝑍1
Where
• 𝑀𝑡1 = 109419.0234 N.mm
• 𝑌𝑉1 = 0.3296
• 𝜎𝑏 = 400 𝑁Τ𝑚𝑚2
• 𝑍1 = 18
• 𝜑�𝑚 = 𝑏Τ𝑚𝑡= 10 Assume as per PSG Guidelines
𝒎𝒂𝒗 ≥ 2.1304 ≈ 3 ---PSG 8.2
Consideration of Dynamic load at high speed. We consider higher
module for safe design
𝒎𝒏 = 3 mm
Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri
Checking For Wear failure
3
0.72 𝑖 2 +1 ൗ2
• 𝜎𝑐 = × 𝐸 × 𝑀𝑡 < 𝜎𝑐 ---PSG 8.13
𝑅−0.5𝑏 𝑖𝑏
• Where
• i = 3.89
• + sign for external gearing
10𝑚𝑡
• 𝑚𝑡 = 𝑚𝑎𝑣 + sin 𝜃𝑃 = 3.4816 mm
𝑍1
𝑚𝑡 ×𝑍1
• 𝑅= = 125.6426mm
2 sin 𝜃𝑃
• b = Face Width = 10 x 𝑚𝑡 OR 0.3R whichever Higher
b = 34.816mm OR 37.6927mm We go with b = 37.6927 mm
• E= 2.1 x 105 𝑁Τ𝑚𝑚2 ---PSG 1.1
• 𝑀𝑡1 = 109419.0234 N.mm

𝜎𝑐 = 679.3558 𝑁Τ𝑚𝑚2 < 𝜎𝑐 = 1100 𝑵Τ𝒎𝒎𝟐


Hence we can say that design is safe against wear failure
Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri
Determination of Beam Strength
• Beam Strength 𝐹𝑏 = 𝜎𝑏 b𝑌𝑣 1 − 𝑏Τ𝑅 𝑚𝑡 ---PSG 8.52

Where
• 𝜎𝑏 = 400 𝑁Τ𝑚𝑚2
• b =37.6927 mm
• 𝑌𝑉1 = 0.3296
• 𝑚𝑡 = 3.4816 mm
• 𝑅 = 125.6426
𝑭𝒃 = 11927.6101 N
Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri
Check Against Lewis Dynamic Load
• 𝐹𝑑 = 𝐹𝑡 × 𝐶𝑣 × 𝑁𝑆𝐹 × 𝐾𝑚 ---PSG 8.52
• Where
• 𝐹𝑡 = Tangential Force acting on Gear
= 𝑀𝑡1 ൗ𝐷1𝑎𝑣𝑔Τ2
𝑀𝑡1 = 109419.0234 N.mm
𝐷1 = 𝑚𝑎𝑣𝑔 × 𝑍1 = 54 mm
𝐹𝑡 = 4052.5564 N
6+𝑉𝑚
• 𝐶𝑣 = 𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = For carefully Cut Gears ---PSG 8.51
6
𝜋𝐷𝑎𝑣𝑔 𝑁
𝑉𝑚 = Pitch Line Velocity = = 2714.3361 𝑚𝑚Τ𝑠𝑒𝑐 = 2.7143 𝑚Τ𝑠𝑒𝑐
60
𝐶𝑣 = 1.4523
• 𝑁𝑆𝐹 -: Service factor– We already considered hence consider as 1
• 𝐾𝑚 -: Load Distribution factor -: We assume one gear straddle mounted hence = 1.2
𝑭𝒅 = 7062.6332 N < 𝑭𝒃 = 11927.6101 N
Hence we can say that Deign is safe against Lewis Dynamic Load
Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri
Check Against Buckingham's Dynamic Load
0.164𝑉𝑚 𝑐𝑏 +𝐹𝑡
• 𝐹𝑏𝑑 = 𝐹𝑡 + ---PSG 8.51
0.164𝑉𝑚 +1.485 𝑐𝑏 +𝐹𝑡
Where
• 𝐹𝑡 = 4052.5564 N = 405.25kgf
𝜋𝐷𝑡 𝑁
• 𝑉𝑚 = Consider for maximum Pitch circle diameter= 60
𝐷𝑡 = 𝑚𝑡 × 𝑍1 = 3.4816 X 18 = 62.6688 mm
𝑉𝑚 = 3150.0775 mm/sec = 3.15 m/sec
• b = Face Width = 37.6927 mm = 3.6793 cm
• c = 11860e ( For 20° Pressure angle, Steel with Steel Pair) ---PSG 8.53 T 41
e = 0.025 For carefully cut gear and 4 mm module ---PSG 8.53 T 42
c = 296.5
𝐹𝑏𝑑 = 418.5861kgf = 4185.861 N < 𝑭𝒃 = 11927.6101 N
Hence We can say that design is safe against Buckingham's Dynamic load
Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri
Summery of Design
• 𝑚𝑎𝑣𝑔 = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒 = 3 𝑚𝑚
• 𝑚𝑡 = Transverse Module = 3.4816 mm
• 𝑍1 = 18 𝑍2 = 70
• Addendum = 1𝑚𝑡 = 3.4816 mm
• Dedendum = 1.25 𝑚𝑡 = 4.352 mm
• 𝑅 = Cone Radius = 125.6426 mm
𝐴𝑑𝑑
• Addendum Angle α = tan−1 = 1.5873°
𝑅
𝐷𝑒𝑑
• Dedendum Angle β = tan−1 = 1.9838°
𝑅

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Parameter Formula Pinion Gear Wheel
Semi cone angle 𝜃𝑃 14.4168° 75.5832°
Face cone Angle 𝜃𝑓 𝜃𝑃 + 𝜃𝑓 16.0041° 77.1705°
Root Cone Angle 𝜃𝑅 𝜃𝑃 - 𝜃𝑅 12.433° 73.5994°
Pitch Circle Diameter D 𝑚𝑡 × 𝑍 62.6688 mm 243.712mm
Addendum circle D + 2(Add× cos α) 69.6293 mm 250.6725 mm
diameter
Root Circle Diameter D - 2(Ded× cos 𝛽) 53.97 mm 235.0132 mm

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri


Thank You….

Prof Sumit S Malusare,FAMT,Ratnagiri

You might also like