Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SEDIMENTATION
SEDIMENTATION
This experiment wants to discover the effect of the initial concentration and the initial
height on sedimentation characteristics specifically to plot the initial mass settling rate
paper, the settling velocity against the limiting concentration and to deduce that the
graphs of settling velocity against limiting concentration are similar for all cases.
gravity. A particle will in a fluid will settle because of its density is greater than the fluid
in which it is suspended. In the first part, different concentrations of the slurry were
allowed to settle in different cylinders. The data gathered were then processed and
resulted with an inverse relationship between the concentration and settling velocity. As
the concentration increases, the rate of settling decreases. In the second part, a certain
concentration of slurry was allowed to settle in the cylinders but in different initial
heights. The data gathered showed a direct relationship between the change in initial
Sedimentation is the process of deposition of solid material from a fluid, usually air
Sedimentary Petrology, studies the origin of rocks by this method. The physics of the
most common sedimentation process, the settling of solid particles in a fluid medium,
The settling velocity equation formulated by G.G Stokes in 1851 is the classic starting
point for any discussion of the sedimentation process. Stokes shoed that the terminal
the solid and the fluid, to the square of the radius of the sphere, to the force of gravity
and inversely proportional to the fluid viscosity. This equation is valid only for very slow
motions, so more elaborate equations have been developed for faster-moving particles.
large compared to the size of the particles and the effects of mutual interference are
often disregarded. The rate of settling of a constituent particle under these conditions,
called free settling, is then calculated from a single particle motion. At higher
in that the upward velocity of the fluid displaced by the settling particles is much greater
and the flow patterns are appreciably altered. The process is then known as hindered
sedimentation apparatus
mesh
beaker
spatula
stirring rod
2.2 Methods
The calcium carbonate was first sieved in order to achieve a uniform particle size
using a mesh. The calcium carbonate is then mixed with water in 5 different
concentration levels in 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% by weight. Each of the slurry is
then placed in the sedimentation tubes at the same height. The readings were noted
at different time intervals until all calcium carbonates are completely settled down.
The slurries were then left for 24 hours to record the final compaction readings.
3. Results with Calculations
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
45−32 27−17
v3 = =1.444 v 6= =0.106
9 94
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
335−172 48−32
v3 = =18.111 v 6= =0.170
9 94
490( 0.04)
C 7−8= =0.676
29
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
192−149 58−49
v3 = =4.778 v 6= =0.096
9 94
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
389−270 131−71
v3 = =13.222 v 6= =0.638
9 94
Slurry Concentration Calc:
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
152−112 18−13
v 2= =40 v5 = =0.263
1 19
56−24 16−12
v3 = =8 v 6= =0.082
4 49
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
253−209 29−23
v1 = =44 v 4= =0.316
1 19
177−91 20−17
v 2= =21.5 v5 = =0.061
4 49
77−29 19−16
v3 = =5.333 v 6= =0.002
9 1594
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
353−305 37−32
v1 = =48 v 4= =0.263
1 16
305−171 30−25
v 2= =33.5 v5 = =0.102
4 49
123−47 26−22
v3 = =8.444 v 6= =0.003
9 1594
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
441−372 57−45
v1 = =69 v 4= =0.632
1 19
359−240 51−35
v 2= =29.75 v5 = =0.327
4 49
137−71 42−27
v3 = =7.333 v 6= =0.009
9 1594
Interphase Interphase
Settling Velocity Slurry Conc.
Time (min) height Height Intercept
(mm/min) (kg/L)
(mm) (mm)
494−406 103−70
v1 = =88 v 4= =1.737
1 19
407−235 89−43
v 2= =43 v5 = =0.939
4 49
214−108 71−33
v3 = =11.778 v 6= =0.024
9 1594
Based on the gathered data in Part A, the change in the concentration of the
slurry affects the value of the settling velocity. It is observed that the height of the sludge
decreases slowly as the concentration of the slurry increases. The settling velocities
were obtained by getting the difference of the initial height of the sludge (calcium
carbonate) and the interphase height over the time interval recorded. It is also observed
that the final concentration recorded is lesser than the original concentration and this is
because some of the calcium carbonate are dissolved in water. In part B, the different
initial heights affects the values of the settling velocity. It is observed in tables 6 – 10
that the settling velocity values increases as the initial height increases in the different
trials.
6. Conclusion
The sedimentation is one of the unit operation commonly used in the industry
because of its low cost and can give good results in separating solid and liquid phases.
The change in concentration of the slurry affects the settling velocity because of the
velocity gradients in the fluid surrounding the particles is greater due to the closer
proximity of the particles. The increase of the initial heights also affects the settling
velocity because of the velocity gradients in the fluid surrounding the particles is lesser
compared to part A. The change in initial height would mean that the particles in the
slurry are even more scattered and the amount of particles did not change compare to
part A. This would mean that free settling is more favorable. Stokes law can be applied
for this experiment because of the very low settling velocities gathered and would mean
7. Recommendation
In this experiment, there are several precaution we must take to avoid and
prevent errors to occur. Ensure the clarity of the glass apparatus since the one present
in the laboratory is not that clear anymore and the markings are also not clear which
may result to erroneous reading of values. The cylinders also are needed to be
replaced. The lights are not that bright enough to see the tip of the height of the sludge
so make sure there is a good lighting in the area in order to visibly see the height of the
sludge.
8. References