patterresearch education, academic writing, public engagement, funding, other

eccentricities.
Skip to content
Home
about me
my research
my books
contributions and comments
← writing targets – word count, time spent, or chunks?the joys of creative re-
description →
a thesis (often) needs A Big Idea
Posted on June 10, 2019 by pat thomson
rids-1602544-unsplash.jpg

Everyone knows that the thesis has to make a contribution. No probs. Well yes,
there are actually probs. At the end of the research it can be hard to find one.
Contribution, where is it?

You’re exhausted from generating all that data and trying to make sense of it. You
have descriptions of what you think you can say – and categories. Categories galore
– themes and key points. And you can talk about how at least some of this is new.
But you can’t seem to get past what you have done. You are just too close to your
data.

The too-close stuck-ness often appears at one or two points in thesis writing- (1)
not being able to work out how to break the results up into chapters or (2) not
being to write a ‘discussion’.

What’s stopping you? Well maybe what’s missing is The Big Idea that is going to
make everything come together and hang together.

A good (social science, arts and humanities and some sciences) thesis depends on
you finding your Big Idea. The one sentence which sums up what it is that you think
you now know that you didn’t when you started. The one sentence that lets you
construct the chapters and say what they add up to.

Let me give you an idea of how The Big Idea might work. Suppose I have researched
people who are writing their PhDs. I’ve interviewed them and read their texts.

I can see from the interview transcripts that the interviewees often experience
periods where they are unsure of what they are writing. I can see that most of them
are reluctant to make claims that are too bold. I can see that most of them
struggle with structuring their text and they fall back to the default IMRAD
structure. I look to see what is lacking from their accounts and I see people
variously not yet knowing how to write a big argument and not feeling suitably
expert.

What Big Idea might encapsulate that set of results?

In this case it was – yes this was an real research project done by Barbara Kamler
and me – it was the notion of text work/identity work. The idea that text and
identity work were inseparable and produced and reproduced each other. Gaining
authority over the text led to the doctoral researcher feeling more like a
researcher. Presenting at a conference as an expert on a topic made the researcher
feel more like a researcher and they carried that sense of authority back into
their writing and wrote a little differently.

So if we had written our research as a thesis or scholarly monograph, then Barbara

and I would have structured our text around The Big Idea of text work/identity
work. And it might have looked a bit like this:

The problem – doctoral writing and doctoral researchers struggling with writing
Introducing key concepts – writing as a social practice, theories of identity,
Reporting methodology research design and audit trail of the research
Writing in progress, identities in formation– the various processes used by
doctoral researchers to get on top of their text
Texts in formation – analysis of some texts and interview material to show where
and how doctoral researchers were able to make identity and/or text shifts or were
stuck
The literature review and discussion of results as key sites for text work and
identity work
Introduction and explanation of the notion of text work/identity work, examining
the practices and organisational cultures that supported and hindered tw/iw
formation
Concluding by naming the contribution – text work/identity work with implications
for practice and policy, referring back to the discussion.
Well, we didn’t write this book.

(But a lot of the material can be found in the book we did write for supervisors
Helping doctoral students write.)

Finding the Big Idea isn’t always easy. And of course some people do get away
without one. However, most people do need The Big Idea to make their argument.

The Big Idea is your one minute answer to the question, What did you find in your
research? And you don’t have to wait until someone asks you this question. You can
ask it of yourself, particularly as you are working with your data, what it is that
you think that you can see emerging? And as you get to the point where you start
writing, ask the What did you find? question then – it’s a really helpful start to
planning your thesis structure.

Focussing on Your Big Idea is not as scary as ‘making the contribution’,

‘discussing the results’. The Big Idea is a scaffold to the necessary thinking and
writing. Getting hold of it and saying it in simple straightforward words also
helps you write an abstract or a road map, plan chapters by amassing the pieces
necessary for storyboarding or writing chapter Tiny Texts. That’s because starting
with your problem and working right to the Big Idea – drum roll, Ta Da – gives you
the red thread that will guide the reader through the text.

Do I write like this? Oh yes absolutely. I always sort out my Big Idea when I start
to write a paper or a book.

And it was actually my own PhD supervisor who taught me that The Big Idea was
helpful as a writing process. He once gave me twenty four hours to come back to him
with my thesis chapter outlines. He didn’t suggest I needed a Big Idea, as I
remember it, but I found I had to have one to get my task done within the time
limit he set.

And afterwards I learnt that getting The Big Idea and an outline made my writing go
really quickly. (Thanks Richard.) So I do the same. I always ask for The Big Idea
from the doctoral researchers I work with too.

See also:

Take home point

PhD contribution
Original contribution

Photo by Rids on Unsplash

Share this:
TwitterFacebookPinterest3LinkedInTumblrPrintEmailRedditPocket

finishing the phd – write a Tiny Text

October 3, 2016
In "abstracts"
story-boarding the thesis structure
March 28, 2013
In "academic writing"
turning your thesis into a book
September 23, 2013
In "academic book"

About pat thomson

Pat Thomson is Professor of Education in the School of Education, The University of
Nottingham, UK
View all posts by pat thomson →
This entry was posted in academic writing, argument, Big Idea, contribution,
thesis. Bookmark the permalink.
← writing targets – word count, time spent, or chunks?the joys of creative re-
description →
5 Responses to a thesis (often) needs A Big Idea
Dr David T Evans, OBE NTF PFHEA says:
June 10, 2019 at 7:33 am
Always such wonderful suggestions for me to pass on to doctoral candidates that I
supervise and to put in to practice, personally, in my own writing. Thanks once
again, Prof Thomson.
David

Like

Reply
AliFly* says:
June 10, 2019 at 7:51 am
Oh Pat! I could KISS you! You’re always wonderful but this time you’ve outdone
yourself! The timing for this could not be more perfect! I read this blog then
literally went and wrote my concluding Big Ideas for my thesis. THANK YOU thank you
Thank You!

Like

Reply
Tobeka says:
June 10, 2019 at 9:41 am
AliFly Pat was Saviour when I was writing my last chapters and I used her brilliant
ideas and I made it. I graduated my PhD in 2017. Thank you Pat.

Like

Reply
Jumal Ahmad says:
June 11, 2019 at 12:58 am
Thanks for sharing. Very helpfull
Like

Reply
madnecessity says:
June 13, 2019 at 9:49 pm
this is exactly what I need to read right now

Like

Reply
Leave a Reply
Enter your comment here...
image

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts
by email.

Email Address:
Enter your email address

Follow

Join 35,108 other followers

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

978041548412197804154841459780415809313
51rBglFYB7L9780415820844
Follow me on Twitter

patter on facebook

Recent Posts
the bibliomemoir – a musing
setting goals – starting the PhD
writing a lot – starting the PhD, and finishing it
unlearning who you are and what you know? starting the doctorate
starting the doctorate – finding good advice
forced rest
how to talk about writing…
a book about style and form
last-minute proofing – 12 things to look for
patter’s diary
should you highlight the paper you’re reading?
propositional density – a helpful steer on writing and revising
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET

LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK
AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON
https://wakelet.com/@patter
abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in
writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing
conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution data
data analysis doctoral research early career researchers editing examiner feedback
introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review
literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD planning
publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy
starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized
voice
Top Posts & Pages
writing a bio-note
aims and objectives - what's the difference?
what's a framework? - as in, conceptual or theoretical framework
20 reading journal prompts
avoiding the laundry list literature review
the bibliomemoir - a musing
what's a #phd 'contribution'?
connecting chapters/chapter introductions
concluding the journal article
what’s with the name doctoral ‘student’?
Meta
Register
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.com
patterBlog at WordPress.com.
:)