Zygmunt Bauman: Liquid Modernity and Beyond

Liquid Modernity by Zygmunt Bauman; The Individualized Society by Zygmunt Bauman; The
Bauman Reader by Zygmunt Bauman; Peter Beilharz
Review by: Nicholas Gane
Acta Sociologica, Vol. 44, No. 3 (2001), pp. 267-275
Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4194889 .
Accessed: 09/09/2013 21:21

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Acta
Sociologica.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

REVIEW ESSAY
Zygmunt Bauman: Liquid Modernity and
Beyond
Nicholas Gane
Departmentof Sociology,CityUniversity,London,UK
Zygmunt Bauman: Liquid Modernity (Cam-
bridge: Polity, 2000).
Zygmunt Bauman: The IndividualizedSociety
(Cambridge:Polity, 2001).
Peter Beilharz (ed.): TheBaumanReader(Oxford:
Blackwell, 2001).
During the late 1980s and early 1990s,
Zygmunt Bauman was one of the few social
theorists (at least with any success) to fuse
analysis of the postmodern condition with an
attempt to develop a postmodern sociology in its
own right. This project culminated in the
publication of Legislators and Interpreters
(1987) and Intimations of Postmodernity
(1992), works that have since become 'classics'
in their field. In recent years, however, Bauman
has turned away from 'postmodernism' to
forward a theory of a second, 'liquid'modernity.
The main aim of the present essay is to outline
and assess this apparent shift in position, and to
question, albeit briefly, Bauman's response to
the 'liquefaction' of contemporary society.
1. Reading Bauman
The Bauman Reader, as one would expect,
contains extracts from a number of Bauman's
key works. These extracts are grouped accord-
ing to the following themes: socialism, class and
power, hermeneutics and critical theory, post-
modernism, modernity, the Holocaust, ambiva-
lence and order, and globalization and poverty.
For those who approach Bauman's work for the
first time, there is plenty to get to grips with
here, especially the challenging sections repro-
duced from Legislatorsand Interpreters(Bauman
1987; Beilharz 2001:103-124), Modernityand
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
ACTA SOCIOLOGICA2001
the Holocaust (Bauman 1989; Beilharz: 230-
259) and Modernityand Ambivalence(Bauman
1991a; Beilharz 2001:281-297). For those
who are familiar with these texts meanwhile,
there are sections from his lesser-known early
writings to turn back to. Of these, the extracts
from Socialism: The Active Utopia (1976a) and
Memoriesof Class (1982) are the most striking,
for they show Bauman's early interest in the
cultural aspects of social phenomena (long
before 'postmodernism' became fashionable),
and with this perhaps signpost the direction of
his later work. The first of these pieces, 'The
Historical Location of Socialism' (Beilharz
2001:30-39), treats modernity as a social
rather than technological phenomenon, as
'above all, a modern network of human
relations' (2001:30). Following Reinhard
Bendix, Bauman sees this network as being
shaped by two main trends: the rise of
'impersonalism' (with the accompanying
decline of paternalistic relations) and the advent
of 'plebiscitarianism' (the inclusion of the
masses into politics as citizens of the state).
The former of these processes leads, Bauman
argues, to a 'topping' of the traditional life-
world with new impersonal structures. These
structures sit on top of, rather than simply
replace, old 'particularized',social forms, so that
A very large part of the life-world still remains
heavily 'particularized', densely packed with
face-to-face, multifaceted relations and appar-
ently open to meaning-negotiating initiatives; it
is still "free" in the latter sense, its freedom
having been given a new, deeper dimension and
been made particularly conspicuous by contrast
with the new domain of the thoroughly
standardized prefigured relations. The "free-
dom" which prevails in this part of the life-
world should only be understood in these
268 ACTASOCIOLOGICA
2001
comparative terms' (Beilharz 2001:32). This
'freedom', however, is also to be read in
connection to the plebiscitarianism of modern
politics, which draws its sovereignty and legiti-
macy from the collective will of the masses, and
which assures (in principle, if rarely in practice)
the formal equality of citizens before the law.
This equality is quantitative rather than quali-
tative in nature, meaning that 'citizens are
equal in so far as they are indistinguishable;
whatever makes them different from each other
is simply left outside the realm of politics and the
interests of the body politic' (Beilharz 2001:33).
Bauman's argument is that it is precisely this
form of 'equality', based on the assumption that
non-political inequalities do not affect the role of
the citizen, that socialism takes issue with. It
rejects outright the belief that a citizen can have
equal political rights while remaining unequal
outside of politics, and, in view of this, pledges to
extend equality beyond politics to other life
spheres. And on the basis of this, Bauman
defines socialism as a 'counter-culture', for it
rejects but also continues 'liberal-capitalist
culture' by drawing a conclusion that was
refused initially by liberal ideology: 'that what
had been done in politics could and should be
repeated in the other spheres of human
deprivation' (Beilharz 2001:35).
This emphasis on culture also lies at the
centre of Bauman's early position on class. His
argument (Bauman 1982; Beilharz 2001:68-
103) is that class can no longer be understood
in terms of a struggle for control over the
production and management of surplus value,
for late industrial societies are held together by
'systematic' rather than 'social' dependencies.
This means, in short, that 'The management of
surplus product (of its production as well as
allocation) is now a function of the system; no
single group, identified by a specific legal own-
ership status, or access to special sources of
authority, or by any other unique property,can
either do, or aspire to do it, alone' (Beilharz
2001:98). By extension, no one group can be
seen to represent the interests of the 'system as a
whole', and 'no group pressure, or a group
legitimising this pressure, is likely to provide a
solution to the system's problems' (Beilharz
2001:98). Rather, the state plays an increased
role in the production and distribution of 'social
surplus', and this leads, in turn, to the
emergence of new political divisions, tensions
and alliances as groups fight for recognition
and/or representation of their interests. These
interests may be cultural or political in nature,
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
44
VOLUME
but have tended to be translated by the state
(and, ironically, by Marxist theory) into (eco-
nomic) conflicts over the 'division of surplus'.
This 'economization' of social conflicts, how-
ever, is no longer possible, not least because
these conflicts have proliferated and diversified
beyond state control. And in view of this,
Bauman asserts the need for a new concept of
'social power'; one that moves from an idea of a
single dominant class to a theory of competing
group interests, and centred upon practices of
consumption rather than the struggle for
management of production.
2. Liquid modernity
A number of these themes recur throughout
Bauman's better-known writings of the late
1980s and early 1990s. In particular, they
resurface in his account of the shift from
modernity, which is founded upon universally
binding norms, to postmodernity, which is
characterized by 'pluralism of authority' and
'centrality of choice' (see Beilharz 2001:173-
188). In the final chapter of TheBaumanReader
(a discussion between Bauman and Beilharz
dating from February/March 1999), however,
Bauman announces a new phase of work, one
concerned less with industrial modernity or
postmodernity than with the definition and
analysis of a second, 'liquid' modernity. He
explains: 'I am inclined to describe our kind of
social condition as "light", or "liquefied"mod-
ernity - as distinct from "heavy",and better still
"hard"and "solid"modernity of yore: ours is not
the "constructed", administered and managed,
but a diffuse, all-permeating, all-penetrating,
all-saturating kind of modernity' (Beilharz
2001:339). This new condition, characterized
by the flow of (electronically conducted) infor-
mation (software) rather than the embedded-
ness of heavy commodities (hardware), has been
the subject of a trilogy of recent works by
Bauman. The first, Globalization:The Human
Consequences (1998), traces the increasing
separation of local (and national) politics from
global powers, and posits the emergence of a
new class hierarchy based upon the capacity for
global mobility (see Gane 2001). The second, In
Searchof Politics(1999) examines the condition
of Unsicherheit ('uncertainty, insecurity, un-
safety') that has emerged as a consequence
of globalization, and calls for a reworking of
private/public space (the agora) in a bid to
revitalize collective social and political forms.
 LiquidModernityand Beyond 269

Finally, LiquidModernity(2000), the subject of
the present review, develops the arguments of
both these works, and explores the increased
'fluidity' of contemporary social life through
analysis of five key issues: emancipation,
individuality, time/space, work and community.
This latter work opens with a detailed
definition of the concept of liquid modernity.
Bauman, working in the spirit of Marx, proposes
that modernity has been a process of 'liquefac-
tion' from its outset, for in its earliest form it
cleared away or 'melted' the solids of the ancien
regime(tradition, customary rights, obligations,
family duties). This 'melting' resulted initially
from the pursuit of a new order that was more
'solid' than that it replaced; one structured by
the rational calculation of effects (Weber), class
relations and the increasing dominance of the
economic sphere (Marx). This, however, has
now changed, for in the new (second) phase of
modernity all solids have become fluids once
again, only this time with no new structures to
re-solidify them. Indeed, Bauman proposes that
the structural 'brakes' on individual freedom
have, for the most part, been released: processes
of deregulation, liberalization and 'flexibiliza-
tion' have led to the radical disengagement of
'free agents' from the system, and to the
unlocking of individual choices from collective
projects and actions. Bauman reflects:
nomads and to pursue our chosen life politics
without external intervention.
In this respect, today's society is more fluid
and freer than ever before, but there is a twist in
the tail: this freedom is tied to a new 'post-
Panoptical' strategy of power. Power is now free
to move rather than grounded in a mutual
engagement between 'the supervisors and the
supervised, capital and labour, leaders and their
followers, armies at war' (Bauman 2000:11). It
is no longer constrained by territory but is the
effect of mobility and speed. It is light, fluid and
disengaged, and is both the cause and effect of
the new-found transience of social forms:
... social disintegration is as much a condition as
it is the outcomeof the new techniqueof power,
using disengagementand the art of escape as its
majortools.Forpowerto be freeto flow,the world
must be free of fences, barriers,fortifiedborders
and checkpoints.Any dense and tight networkof
socialbonds,and particularlya territoriallyrooted
tight network,is an obstacleto be clearedout of
the way. Globalpowersare bent on dismantling
such networksforthe sakeof theircontinuousand
growing fluidity,that principalsource of their
strengthandthe warrantof theirinvincibility. And
it is the fallingapart,the friability,the brittleness,
the transience, the until-further-noticenessof
human bonds and networkswhich allow these
powersto do theirjob in the firstplace. (Bauman
2000:14)

Oursis. . . an individualized,privatizedversionof And this, for Bauman, marks the dawning of a

modernity,with the burden of pattern-weaving new dystopia, for it spells the demise of collective
and the responsibilityfor failurefallingprimarily forms of action and with this the disintegration
on the individual'sshoulders.It is the patternsof of the 'social' more generally. Indeed, no longer
dependencyand interaction whose turn to be is it a viable possibility for the majority to take a
liquefiedhas now come.Theyarenow malleableto collective stand against power, for not only does
an extentunexperiencedby,and unimaginablefor,
pastgenerations;but likeall fluidstheydo not keep power move too quickly, but the mass itself has
their shape for long. Shapingthem is easierthan been reduced to a collection of individuals who
keepingthemin shape.Solidsarecast once andfor are preoccupied with their own freedoms, and
all. Keeping fluids in shape requires a lot of who remain disengaged spatially from a global
attention,constantvigilanceand perpetualeffort elite (the new 'absentee landlords') who are
- and even then the success of the effort is never weighed down by possessions and, free of
anythingbut a foregoneconclusion.(2000:7-8) ties to any particular territory,are always on the
move.
There are, in short, no longer traditional The main body of LiquidModernityexam-
patterns, codes, rules or 'pre-allocatedreference ines the features of this new social condition in
groups' that individuals can look to as stable some detail. Chapter 1 addresses the question of
orientation points in their lives and be guided by. emancipation. Bauman's position here is novel,
Rather, individuals now face an array of for he argues that contemporary life is as 'free'
conflicting life-choices on their own, meaning as could possibly be imagined, for now 'social
that they face them in increasing isolation and institutions are only too willing to cede the
with little prospect of assistance from any worries of definitions and identities to the
collective body or system. With this, 'society', individual initiative' (2000:22), but that this
for Bauman, becomes increasingly remote from 'freedom' gives rises to a whole new set of
our lives, leaving us to act, for the most part, as problems. The main one of these is that

This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
270 ACTA SOCIOLOGICA2001
individuals have to take responsibility for their
own self-determination without the traditional
help of any collective agency, leaving them
isolated and preoccupied with their own perso-
nal troubles (which Bauman treats as 'non-
additive' and thus removed from a 'common
cause'). A result of this is that public life
becomes colonized by private issues: 'public
interest" is reduced to curiosity about the
private lives of public figures, and the art of
public life is narrowed to the public display of
private affairs and public confessions of private
sentiments (the more intimate the better)'
(Bauman 2000:37). And with this process of
individualization, individuals cease to be true
citizens, for they no longer share common
public interests, and society ceases to be
autonomous, for it is no longer self-constituted
through the shared accomplishments of its
members. Bauman's response to this situation
is to push for a revitalization of public/private
space (the agora) (see Bauman 1999; Gane
2000) through protection of the public sphere
from invasion from private interests. This, he
proposes, is to be the task of critical theory: Any
true liberation calls today for more, not less, of
the "public sphere" and "public power"' (Bau-
man 2000:51).
The following chapters build on this theme.
In Chapter 2, Bauman takes a profoundly anti-
Weberian stance on the question of individual-
ity, arguing that the concepts of instrumental-
and value-rationality are now outdated, for in
liquid modernity the ends of actions, rather
than the means by which to achieve them, are
the cause of fundamental uncertainty. He
observes: 'the odds are that most of human life
and most of human lives will be spent agonizing
about the choice of goals, rather than finding
the means to the ends which do not call for
reflection' (Bauman 2000:61). This is so
because the range of pursuable ends has
proliferated wildly with modernization (what
Baudrillard (1990:11-12) calls 'hypertely'),
meaning that now (as Simmel (1997) envi-
saged) there are simply too many possibilitiesfor
any one individual to explore. This, in part, is
the consequence of a shift from life organized
around production (which is normatively regu-
lated) to life organized around consumption,
which, for Bauman, is without norms insofar as
it is guided by 'seduction, ever rising desires and
volatile wishes' (2000:76). And in this respect,
life in liquid modernity is akin to life in the
shopping mall: we are now individualized
consumers 'free' to "'shop around" in the
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
VOLUME44
supermarket of identities' (Bauman 2000:83),
constrained only by the resources at our
disposal.
Bauman returns to this question of con-
sumption in an analysis of liquid time/space in
chapter 3. Here. he divides city-space into four
main types: emic, phagic, non-places and empty
space. The first of these is public yet non-civil
urban space which is meant to be looked at
rather than lived in, and operates by 'spitting
out' or barring those not seen to belong there
(La Defense in Paris is cited as an example).
Phagic space is again public yet non-civil in
nature, but encourages the sharing of physical
space (such as shopping malls) with others
engaged in the same activity (consuming), and
employs a different way of coping with other-
ness: "'ingesting", "devouring" foreign bodies
and spirits so that they be made, through
metabolism, identical with, and no longer
distinguishable from, the "ingesting" body'
(Bauman 2000:101 ). Finally, non-places are
those 'nowherevilles' that discourage settlement
but nonetheless remain inhabited by strangers
(examples are airports, motorways. hotels),
while empty space refers to those areas that
have yet to be colonized by designers, and
hence remain, at least from the outside, empty
of meaning. These four types of space have
come to dominate the urban environment, yet
to some extent this development has been
overshadowed by a more important phenom-
enon: the increasing irrelevance of space itself.
For whereas in 'heavy' (industrial) modernity
the possession of space was the key issue, now it
is the push for 'instant' living. Bauman
explains: In the software universe of light-
speed travel, space may be traversed, literally,in
"no time"; the difference between "far away"
and "down here" is cancelled. Space no more
sets limits to action and its effects, and counts
little, or does not count at all. It has lost its
"strategic value", the military experts would
say' (2000:117).
The final two chapters of LiquidModernity
turn to the issues of work and community. In
the former of these, Bauman treats the emer-
gence of privatized, deregulated and flexible
work patterns as paralleling the shift from
marriage to cohabitation in personal relation-
ships: 'Marriages "till death us do part" are
decidedly out of fashion and have become a
rarity... "Flexibility"is the slogan of the day,
and when applied to the labour market it augurs
an end to the "job as we know it", announcing
instead the advent of work on short-term

contracts, rolling contracts or no contracts,
positions with no in-built security but with the
"until further notice" clause' (2000:147).
Finally, he examines the renewal of 'commu-
nity' as a possible solution to this uncertain new
world. Here, he takes a fierce stand against the
communitarian position, arguing that it takes a
model of 'ethnic community' as its foundation,
and seeks to recapture the ethnic homogeneity
achieved, at least in part, by the modern nation-
state. In response, a 'republican model of unity'
is proposed, one that emerges as 'a joint
achievement of the agents engaged in self-
identification pursuits', and proceeds through
negotiation and reconciliation rather than the
'denial, stifling or smothering out of differences'
(2000:178).
3. The individualized society
The IndividualizedSociety restates many of the
arguments of LiquidModernity.It comprises a
number of loosely connected essays collected
under three headings: 'The Way We Are', 'The
Way We Think' and 'The Way We Act'. The first
of these sections repeats much of what Bauman
has said elsewhere. Chapter 1, 'The Rise and
Fall of Labour',reproduces word-for-word(with-
out any acknowledgement) parts of chapter 4 of
LiquidModernity(compare Bauman 1999:140-
152 with 2001:17-28 and 1999:166-7 with
2001:28-30). Chapter 2, 'Local Orders, Global
Chaos', adds little to the arguments of Globaliza-
tion: The Human Consequences(1998), while
chapter 3, 'Freedom and Security', repeats the
position taken in Postmodernityand Its Discon-
tents (1997:1-16) and again cuts-and-pastes
material from LiquidModernity (compare Bau-
man 1999:30-38 with 2001:45-50). There is,
however, some new material included in this
volume. Chapter 4 updates the thesis of
Modernity and Ambivalence(Bauman 1991a),
and points to the individualization of ambiva-
lence, ambiguity and equivocality with the rise
of liquid modernity: 'Likeso many other aspects
of contemporary society, the dangers of ambiva-
lence have undergone a process of deregulation,
and the task of coping with the results . .. has
been privatised. Ambivalence may be, as before,
a social phenomenon, but each one of us faces it
alone, as a personal problem' (2001:69). Bau-
man extends this argument in chapter 6, in
which he identifies four factors that have
contributed to a feeling of increased uncertainty
in contemporary life. First, is the newfound
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LiquidModernityand Beyond 271
inability of traditional (state-centred) institu-
tions to bring (or even promise to bring) order
and stability to global affairs (see Bauman
1998a, 2001:31-40). Second, is 'universal
deregulation': 'the unqualified priority awarded
to the irrationality and moral blindness of
market competition, the unbound freedom
granted to capital and finance at the expense
of all other freedoms, the tearing up of societally
maintained safety nets, and the neglect of all but
economic considerations . . . ' (2001:84).
Third, is the changing nature of interpersonal
relations, which, permeated by the 'spirit of
consumerism', have become increasingly mar-
ket-dependent, so much so that now they even
'reflect the capriciousness and unpredictability
of the market' (2001:86). Finally, traditionally
stable social forms have, for Bauman, become
indeterminate and 'soft', including individual
identities, which are no longer given but
constructed, and are 'split into collections of
snapshots' rather than lived in determinate (or
determined) singularity.
The second part of this work, 'The Way We
Think', again reproduces large chunks of Liquid
Modernity,this time on the issues of critique and
progress (compare Bauman 2001:99-108
with 2000:22-41, and 2001:109-113 with
2000:130-137). This section, however, also
contains an interesting essay on the question of
poverty. In this, Bauman cites statistics that
suggest the emergence of a new global polariza-
tion (the same figures are used in In Search of
Politics, see Bauman (1999:176-177). For
example: 'the three richest men on the globe
have private assets bigger than the combined
national product of the forty-eight poorest
countries; the fortune of the fifteen richest
persons exceeds the total product of the whole
of sub-Saharan Africa' (2001:115). Bauman's
argument, though, is novel: that the 'new poor'
play a specific role in the maintenance of a kind
of global 'order'. The poor, paradoxically, are
those that experience life with some degree of
certainty, 'in the shape of disease-crime-and-
drug-infested mean streets' (2001:116), and
thereby act as a reminder to the rest of society of
the fundamental Unsicherheit(insecurity, uncer-
tainty, unsafety) of life itself: of what happens if
things go wrong. The poor, seen in this way,
cause the rest of society to live in fear, to keep 'at
bay and in step', and to fear certainty more than
uncertainty. There can, for Bauman, be only
one solution to this situation: 'human society
cannot be liberated from its ambient fear and
impotence unless its poorest part is liberated
272 ACTA SOCIOLOGICA2001
from its penury' (2001:116). Quite how this is
to be achieved, however, remains less than clear.
The final section of this book, 'The Way We
Act', centres on the nature of contemporary
ethics and morality.Particularlychallenging are
the essays addressing the connection of love and
reason (chapter 13) and the privatization of
morality (chapter 14). In the former of these,
Bauman draws a distinction between love,
which is about value, and reason, which is
about use. Love, defined in this way, is infinite in
its horizon, while the intention of reason, by
contrast is 'not to open the gate into infinity,but
to shut it down, and securely. The act of use is
an event in time, and an event which fulfils and
exhausts itself in a limited time' (2001:166).
Moreover, whereas reason, for Bauman,
prompts loyalty to the self, love, by contrast,
demands solidarity with the other. Despite these
differences, however, love and reason remain
closely tied. Love (like morality) needs reason as
an escape from its own state of uncertainty, as
an authority that can tell us with some degree of
self-confidence 'how to go on'. It needs reason,
in short, 'as a hide-out from the unspokenness
of ethical demand and the unconditionality of
moral responsibility' (Bauman 2001:1 74). This
tendency, however, is deeply problematic, for
not only does it present the refusal to share as a
moral act, but, more importantly, offers an
escape from morality rather than the means 'to
cope and deal with its genuine dilemmas'
(Bauman 2001:174). No obvious solution is
offered to this problem, but Bauman does tackle
the question of responsibility further in the
course of a dense reflection on the privatization
of moral life. His position here is forged against
the work of Emmanuel Levinas and Hans Jonas.
Levinas, he argues, while offering 'rich inspira-
tion for the analysis of the endemic aporia of
moral responsibility', neglects 'the complex
social/political processes which mediate
between individual moral impulses and the
overall ethical effects of political actions'
(2001:18 3). Jonas, by contrast, places morality
as an event in time and calls for a 'categorical
imperative mark two', but in so doing fails to see
that the interests of ethics and Reason may not
always coincide (see above). In response to both
these positions, Bauman forwards an alterna-
tive perspective:that ethics are 'under siege', for
the emergence of new global dangers has been
accompanied by a 'growing impotence to
prevent them or alleviate the gravity of their
impact' (2001:186). This impotence has
resulted, above all, from the deregulation of
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
VOLUME44
market forces, which, he claims, are now
exempt from effective political control, and
from the new social polarization that has
emerged with globalization (see Bauman
1998). With these processes, traditional social
responsibilities have been privatized or 'indivi-
dualized' (shifted from state institutions to the
individual), with the result that collective action
has become increasingly difficult. And as for
intellectuals saving us from this situation,
Bauman thinks this unlikely: what 'marks off
the present-day thought of knowledge classes is
its self-referentiality, its acute preoccupation
with the conditions of its own professional
activity and an increasingly non-committal
stance taken towards other sectors of society'
(2001:198).
4. Critical remarks
Bauman's work, even if one doesn't always
agree with its conclusions, is a joy to read: it is
inventive, provocative, unpretentious and, most
importantly, packed full of new, challenging
ideas. For these reasons alone I would recom-
mend the three books under review here. This
said, however, each of these publications has its
weaknesses. First, The Bauman Reader:As with
all readers, this work hangs or falls on the
selection of material on offer and the way in
which this material is organized and edited, and
in each of these respects there are difficulties.
First, as Beilharz notes at the outset (2001:vii-
viii), a number of Bauman's works have been
excluded from this volume; in particular:
BetweenClassand Elite (1972), Cultureas Praxis
(1973), Towardsa Critical Sociology (1976b),
Freedom (1988), Mortality, Immortality and
Other Life-Strategies(1991b) and Postmodern
Ethics (1993). Of course, one has to draw the
line somewhere, and little more could be
included in a volume that already stretches to
365 pages. This said, what is at issue is not the
length of this work but the editor's criteria for
prioritizing certain texts over others. Beilharz's
justification is as follows: 'I have endeavoured
both to include selections which are indicative
of the breadth and width of Bauman's thinking,
while at the same time choosing especially those
whose prose form best carries these arguments'
(2001,:vii). This emphasis on breadth and width
coupled with clarity of argument succeeds in
producing a wide-ranging and accessible intro-
duction to the author's work, but does so by
neglecting a number of his more challenging

ideas. A key point in case is the exclusion of
PostmodernEthics (1993), which, in its attempt
to formulate a new non-universalizable and
aporetic morality, is one of Bauman's most
difficult but important texts. The arguments of
Lifein Fragments(1995), Bauman's other main
work on ethical life, are also neglected. A short
section from this work, 'A Century of Camps'
(Beilharz 2001:266-280) is reproduced,but, as
its title suggests, this piece focuses on the
Holocaust and the violence of totalitarianism
rather than the issue of postmodern morality.
The result is that morality and ethics are
excluded as a theme from this reader. And
this, I believe, is a mistake, especially given
Bauman's own declaration that ethics rather
than aesthetics are the central aspect of post-
modernity (see Beilharz 2001:21).
The second main problem with the Reader
is that it lacks editorial precision. The long
section on Critical Theory (2001:138-163),
taken from Etzkowitz and Glassman's The
Renascence of Sociological Theory (1991) is
particularly poor, as there is no referencing
and no bibliography,with the consequence that,
on page 150, Bauman quotes from a work
without us knowing either its title or the
identity of its author (this, admittedly, is an
annoying, if occasional, feature of Bauman's
writings, but one that an editor should seek to
overcome). Elsewhere, important footnotes are
removed from original works, without acknowl-
edgement (see, for example, Beilharz 2001:28 3;
compare with Bauman 199 1a:3-4). And, more
seriously, sections of texts are reproduced with-
out the reader being told whether they have
been taken in their entirety or, if not, where they
have been abridged. In places, standard nota-
tion (. . .) is used to indicate a cut in the text (see
Beilharz 2001:111), but this is not always the
case. The first short section reproduced from
Modernity and Ambivalence (see Beilharz
2001:281-288), for example, is only part of
the introduction to the original work (see
Bauman 1991a:1-9), but nowhere is this said
to be the case. The extract is simply cut to a
rather abrupt and inconclusive end, prompting
one to check against the original and then read
the final seven pages of the chapter, an action
that would seem to defeat the very point of a
reader. This problem, I suggest, could readily be
resolved either through the inclusion of key
extracts (of which this is one) in their entirety,
or, where this is not possible, through a clearer
indication of why each section has been chosen,
where it has been taken from (including page
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LiquidModernityand Beyond 273
references) and whether it has been reproduced
in part or in full.
Regarding LiquidModernityand TheIndivi-
dualizedSociety, the substance rather than the
form of Bauman's argument is problematic. For,
on one hand, these works propose that all aspects
of modern life (for example, personal relation-
ships, working patterns, time/space, commu-
nity) have become increasingly fluid (transient,
uncertain and changeable). While on the other,
they present the case for the emergence of a new
social hierarchy,one that reflects an increasingly
rigid class polarization. These two halves of
Bauman's position appear to lie in fundamental
conflict. For Bauman, the new polarization is
based upon a capacity for movement,so that the
'contemporary global elites' are those 'absentee
landlords' who can travel light and at will, while
the masses have little choice other than to
remain tied to their locality. This is all very
well, but in essence this means nothing much
has changed. The boundaries between the
extraterritorial elites and the masses are still as
solid as ever, the only real difference being that
Bauman has replaced capital with mobility as
the yardstick for 'measuring' class. And this
move leads, in practice, to just the 'economiza-
tion' of social differences that his early work
protests against (see above), as those with capital
(albeit 'light', 'extraterritorial'capital) tend also
to have the ability to move. This 'economization'
may be observedin all of Bauman's recent works.
In Globalization:The Human Consequences,for
example, he informs us that 'the total wealth of
the top 358 "global billionaires" equals the
combined incomes of 2.3 billion of the poorest
people (45 per cent of the world's population)'
(1998:70). In In Searchof Politics,he states:
Among 4.5 billion of the residentsof the "devel-
oping"countries,three in every five are deprived
access to basic infrastructures:a third has no
access to drinkable water, a quarter has no
accommodationworthy of the name, one-fifth
has no use of sanitaryand medicalservices. .. In
70-80 of the 100 or so "developing"countriesthe
averageincome per head of populationis today
lower than ten or even thirty years ago; 120
millionpeoplelive on less than one dollara day.
(1999:1 75-1 76)
And just to drive the point home, he reminds us,
in The IndividualizedSociety, that At the same
time, in the USA, by far the richest country in
the world and the homeland of the world's
wealthiest people, 16.5 per cent of the popula-
tion live in poverty; one-fifth of adult men and
women can neither read nor write, while 13 per
274 ACTA SOCIOLOGICA2001
cent have a life expectancy shorter than sixty
years' (2001:115). What these extracts show is
that behind the new rhetoric of 'fluidity' and
'movement', fairly crude economic differences
are, for Bauman, the defining criteria of the new
global class hierarchy (see Gane 2001). And this
clearly makes his position on the 'new moder-
nity' difficult to sustain, for given that these
material differences are just as hard and fast as
ever, there is little evidence to suggest that the
structural ('solid') inequalities of industrial
modernity have, in fact, been liquefied.
Parts of Bauman's second main thesis -
that we are witnessing the 'individualization'of
society - are also questionable. Bauman is right
to argue that the public sphere is being
colonized by private concerns, and that indivi-
duals have to take increased responsibility for
their successes and failures. At the same time,
however, he tends to downplay the more
positive aspects of the 'fluidity'of contemporary
life. This is particularly the case regarding the
question of identity.He argues: 'What the idea of
"individualization"carries is the emancipation
of the individual from the ascribed, inherited
and inborn determination of his or her social
character' (Bauman 2001:144). To many, this
has come as a welcome development, for it has
marked a new freedom from many of the
constraints of the 'first' modernity, and has
been accompanied by the birth of a new 'life-
politics'. For Bauman, however, this opening
has simply become another burden: it marks the
transformation of identity from a 'given' to a
'task', and the replacement of the heterono-
mous 'determinationof social standing with a
compulsive and obligatory self-determination'
(2001:145). This rather negative outlook
clouds his account of the emergence of new
'liquid' social forms. For example: does the new
transience and fluidity of social life really mean
that we have to face the world as isolated
individuals? Or have new forms of sociality
emerged that are more dynamic and exciting
than before? Indeed, what holds an 'individu-
alized', 'self-determined' society together? In
what ways have key institutions (like the family)
changed, and what exactly do we mean now by
'the social'? These questions are addressed only
superficially in LiquidModernityand TheIndivi-
dualized Society. And while Bauman remains
staunchly critical of the inability of contempor-
ary institutions to translate private (personal)
concerns into collective (public) issues, this
situation, as feminist theory has shown, is
nothing exactly new.
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
VOLUME44
In this latter respect, Bauman's response to
the 'liquefaction' and 'individualization' of
modernity is also disappointing. This response
takes the form of an appeal for the regeneration
of public/private space (the agora), so that
private troubles can once again be translated
into public issues, and the public sphere (the
ecclesia)be protected from invasion by individual
interests (see Bauman 2001:202). This aim is
admirable, but Bauman gives little indication of
how it is to be achieved in practice.The closest he
comes is in In Search of Politics, in which he
asserts that 'individual liberty can be only a
product of collective work' (1999:7), and, on
this basis, proposes that the rebuilding of the
agora is to proceed through 'dismantling the
limits to citizens' freedom' (to protect against
totalitarianism) and through 'self-limitation' on
the part of citizens (to protect against indivi-
dualization) (1999:4). Bauman does little in
either Liquid Modernity or The Individualized
Society to build on this abstract proposal,
although the emphasis of his position changes
slightly. Now, there is no argument to be found
for individual 'self-limitation' (which was never
particularly convincing in the first place), but
rather a demand for greater public power: 'The
war of emancipation is not over. But to progress
any further, it must now resuscitate what for
most of its history it did its best to destroy and
push out of its way. Any trueliberationcalls today
for more,not less, of the 'publicsphere'and 'public
power'. It is now the public sphere which badly
needs defence against the invading private -
though, paradoxically,in order to enhance, not
cut down, individual liberty' (2000:51). What
this 'public sphere' and 'public power', capable
of transforming individuals into citizens, is to
look like, however, we are never told. This is
perhaps because Bauman remains in interpre-
tative rather than legislative mode. But even
this argument is difficult to sustain for in his
conversation with Peter Beilharz at the conclu-
sion of The BaumanReader,he argues that it is
the very purpose of sociology to disclose values
and choices that 'help humanity in life':
'Wertfreiheitis - as human silences are con-
cerned - not just a pipe-dream, but also an
utterly inhuman delusion . . .' (Beilharz 2001:
33 5)). Given this stance, not only is any
distinction between legislation and interpreta-
tion difficult, if not impossible, to uphold (since
every act of interpretation always contains a
legislative moment), but also we may expect
more from Bauman in the way of alternatives to,
or remedies for, liquid modernity. Indeed, it is

here that his argument breaks down, for it is
one thing to propose the reinvigoration of
collective (public) life through the rebuilding of
the agora,but another to apply this ancient ideal
to life today, and to specify exactly how the
public sphere may proceed to regain its past
autonomy.
References
Baudrillard,J. 1990. FatalStrategies.New York:Semiotext(e).
Bauman, Z. 1972. Between Class and Elite. Manchester:
ManchesterUniversityPress.
Bauman, Z. 1973. Cultureas Praxis.London:Routledge.
Bauman, Z. 1976a. Socialism: The Active Utopia. London: Allen Bauman, Z. 2001. TheIndividualized SocietgCambridge:Polity.
and Unwin.
Bauman, Z. 1976b. Towards a Critical Sociology. London:
Routledge.
Bauman, Z. 1982. Memories of Class: The Pre-History and After-
Lifeof Class.London:Routledgeand KeganPaul.
Bauman, Z. 1987. Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity,
Post-Modernity and Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity.
Bauman, Z. 1988. Freedom.Milton Keynes: Open University
Press.
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:21:02 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LiquidModernityand Beyond 275
Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernityand the Holocaust.Cambridge:
Polity.
Bauman, Z. 1991a. Modernityand Ambivalence.Cambridge:
Polity.
Bauman, Z. 1991b. Mortality, Immortalityand Other Life-
Strategies.
Bauman, Z. 1992. Intimations of Postmodernity.London:
Routledge.
Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern Ethics.Oxford:Blackwell.
Bauman, Z. 1995. Life in Fragments:Essays in Postmodern
Morality.Oxford:Blackwell.
Bauman,Z. 1997. Postmodernity andIts Discontents.Cambridge:
Polity.
Bauman, Z. 1998. Globalization:The Human Consequences.
Cambridge:Polity.
Bauman, Z. 1999. In Searchof Politics.Cambridge:Polity.
Bauman, Z. 2000. LiquidModernityCambridge:Polity.
Beilharz,P. (ed.) 2001. TheBaumanReader.Oxford:Blackwell.
Etzkowitz,H. & Glassman,R. M. (eds.) 1991. TheRenascence of
SociologicalTheory:Classicaland Contemporary. Itasca: F. E.
Peacock.
Gane, N. 2001. 'Chasingthe "RunawayWorld":The Politicsof
RecentGlobalizationTheory'.ActaSociologica,44, 1, 81-89.
Simmel, G. 1997. 'The Conceptand Tragedyof Culture'.In D.
Frisby& M. Featherstone(eds.), Simmelon Culture:Selected
Writings.London:Sage.