Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Banking and Financial Markets Law Notes
Banking and Financial Markets Law Notes
Info
Exam:
4-5 åbne spørgsmål som vil afspejle en case.
Cost benefit analysis of where to put the line which decides what is banking and what is not
banking.
The financial system is about people who have a surplus of money, and on the other side guys who
are in need of money.
Banking and financial markets categorized as direct finance and indirect finance
o Banking = indirect.
o Financial markets = direct finance.
Coase Theorem
Advantages of monitoring of people, projects and the creation of incentives to do things in a
certain way.
Value of efficiency – most of the regulation is the result of trying to reach an efficient market.
B. Increasing returns
C. Market imperfections
D. Distributional inequity and other societal concerns (income and wealth)
- Imperfect competition
o Risk that exist in financial markets. The number of players in the market vs. the
number of players wanting to enter the market.
i.e. entry barriers: if one wants to open a bank, you have to get a license and
you will be regulated.
- Negative externalities
o
- Public goods
o
- Biases in individual decision making
o
1. Law:
a. Why to regulate
i. Why regulation emerges
b. How to regulate
i. Types of regulatory instruments and techniques
c. Where to regulate
i. Which actors contribute to that emergence
2. Supervision:
a. ?
Why:
- Because we do realize that along the spectrum of different preffered worlds we stay
somewhere between the perfect and the worst world. We need to have the efficiency as
idea. We need regularly to gather information Impact assessment after a regulation is
issued used to judge which direction we have moved.
The theory of government fear: governments at times, in trying to correct the market failure they
do worse. Cost and income in government’s are not treated as in a company.
Theories of Regulation:
Public interest theories:
- Theory building upon the market failure, there is a problem with the market: we need the
law as a tool to the public good.
How:
Communication based
- i.e. images on smokes,
consequences are too risky.
Where:
Presumptions of the theory and the reality
Supervision
Public power of checking the compliance with the law.
Supervision:
1. Micro (ex post)
a. Check of the bank on the individual level, looking at corporate governance.
2. Macro (ex ante)
a. Looking at the banking system, how do the single banks interact together, systemic
risk, and the possible spread of risk between banks.
Professor does not agree: professor means they are both forward looking in the sense of ex ante.
Prudential:
- Concerned with the relationship with the regulator and the bank (vertical relationship)
(how the bank is organized financial) (financial stability)
Corporate governance: capital requirements etc.
Conduct:
- Concerned with the relationship between the bank and the clients (horizontal relationship)
- (is the bank conducting properly against the client) (“consumer protection”)
Supervisory models and approaches
Functional approach:
Bank that haves different functions such as: insurance and banking. The functional approach
divides the supervision between the banking authorities and the insurance authorities.
Theory of Banking
Legal definitions:
EU the conjunction “and” is the most important in the definition. Because there is no bank without
deposits and granting credits.
Combine both: not making money and not an institution. When a person collects money and pay
the bartender. (he makes only a collection, the others are not repayable)
Liquidity Transformation
Most of the time associated with cash.
Credit Transformation
The transformation process: Two main risks
Credit risk:
- Misjudge the creditworthiness of borrowers
Liquidity risk:
- Unexpected withdrawal of funds by short-term lenders which exhausts its liquid assets
Securitization
Structured products
- ABS :
- RMBS :
- CDO :
This “securitization” increased the risk and increased the amount of loans.
Regulation:
Goals of financial regulation:
- Protection of financial users (investors)
- Consumer protection in retail finance
- Financial stability
- Market efficiency (informational efficiency)
- Competition
-
- Prevention of financial crime
- Gaining importance after scandals
- Thinking of the powers of EBA, all the powers of how the bank is established and
governed according to corporate governance.
Protection of financial users could be a conflict with the protection of financial stability.
On one hand the product may be good for the financial stability but on the other hand may be bad
for the investor(user) because it is too complex and may put the investor at unnecessary/too
much risk.
Areas of regulation
Cooperation – between
In making the law the private actors are delegated power to the banks(private actors) because
banks know better
National level
Standard setters
Are making soft law
G20
Decision-making process
Based on the importance of the country.
Being compliant with the Basel Committee increases a country’s chances of getting new banks
Financial stability in the aspect of the countries not the financial institutions.
Level 1
Directives:
- Least formally directives need to be transposed into national law, leaves some discretion to
the member state
Regulations:
- Immediately enforceable as law in all member states simultaneously, no need for domestic
reception.
Package:
- A package is a combination of a regulation and a directive
Level 2
Legislation/regulation
(EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) check slide 21, lecture 2
ESAs (European supervisory authorities) fill the gaps of technical legislation, by adding some
technicalities that cannot be added at level 1. Binding technical standard, is easier and faster to
change than to change a directive or regulation.
Level 3
ESAs release recommendation and guidelines.
- Very important in terms of good practice.
- governments kind of have to comply, if you do good, if not – you have to explain yourself.
EBA is also the watchdog if someone is not complying with the law
Meroni Doctrine
Romano Doctrine
- boundaries and substance of the powers delegated are important. If these are very well
defined then it is okay.
C-270/12 Shortselling case:
It is recognized that agencys that have delegated powers enjoys the power of flexibility as long as
it is clear they are in pursuit of the goal (in this case financial stability)
EBA
Concerned with drafting the law, in the sense of complementing the law.
Does much more than just draft these binding technical standards. EBA is the supervisor of the
national supervisors
Joint committee: exchange views and practices to ensure they are on the same page at all times.
Main objectives of the EBA (article 8)
Single rule book: all the body of law that is applicable to banks. Object to have something that is
harmonized.
EBA oversight tasks
Quite important in overcoming a single authority to be singled out of the other authorities.
EBA 17,18,19
Denmark vs Estonia. In Danske Bank money laundering scandal
No rule about conflict of interest. Important, regulation: when you are part of EBA and are looking
at possible breaches, you should be neutral/objective.
What are the tasks of the EBA?
- EBA reaches out to all member states
Lesson 3
3 pillars interconnected to each other, all of them make up the European Banking Union.
Not always all of the pillars apply to the EU ( different in monetary policy, for those who adopted
the euro)
The idea was to have a centralized institution of checking all the big players operations in the
market, without bothering about the physical borders of the eurozone
SSM checks your capital, fit and proper people, “daily check”
If SSM finds anything bad you move on to SRM, who have more intrusive power when you have
problems with insolvency, liquidity etc.
SSM and SRM communicate all the time “two faces of the same coin” – the transfer from SSM to
SRM is subtle also in terms of responsibility. SRM deals with a lot of legal risk – suing the bank
because it did not do its job properly.
If a bank has to fail – then SRM makes sure it does it in orderly fashion. Trying to save the good
parts of the bank.
DGS
Class of stake holder that needs to be protected.
We don’t have a single deposit guarantee scheme yet; the EU are trying to harmonize it. The idea
is to have a unified authority.
The European union want to ensure that all the people in the member states can have up to
100.000 euro in seven days if a certain bank should fail.
Single rulebook
The pillars are based on the single rulebook principle
In the pillars you find the single rule book. Single rulebook = Constellation of law
BRRD
The European Central Bank are according to art. 127 TFEU the ECBs only function is to maintain
price stability.
The macro is not excluded in the law, but not well defined either.
Didn’t use 114 to create the SSM
Why did the EU decide to use 127
- Because of the emergency situation , when the eu policy makers understood there should
be something else than the ECB. Some countries were not happy about it. Complicated for
the council to reach a law from 114 out of nothing.
And what are the consequences
The problem is 127 is that it is a conceived as a monetary policy of the ECB, the eurozone is the
collection of 19 countries that decided to adopt the euro. The ECB can only have a say on 19
countries. Weak spot.
The ECB in Frankfurt cannot be spread, over the member states why it will be centralized.
Composed by different components of authorities.
The ECB is exclusively competent to carry out for prudential supervisory in relation to all credit
institutions in the member states.
The ECB has the authority to let a new player enter the market or push a player out of the market.
The NCA will channel everything from the new bank to the ECB
There is room for the authority to question your plan. I.e. make you re calculate based on how the
market is currently. Can i.e. say it is not feasible for the bank to enter the market because of the
fierce competition.
SSM – Distribution of tasks – art. 6 SSM Regulation
If we are in a country that adopted the euro, not all the banks are under the supervision of the
ECB, only the BIG banks, the other banks are subject to the supervision of the NCAs.(national
competent authority)
Single supervisory handbook is more an assurance that all the authorities in EU are on the same
page.
Channels of contagion between banks, even if there are no linkages to other banks.
Old rationale:
No focus on stability
Procyclicality: a certain practice that sets in motion of something negative. i.e. banks giving people
loans who are not worth the loan.
In upswings everyone seems good: which means more loans procyclical (snowball effect)
Cross-Sectional:
The possibility of spillovers of banks, financial markets and insurance and other markets.
(shadow banking) phenomenon entails all the entities that are not banks, but offers services the
like of banks. “Quasi banks” escape the definition of a bank in legal sense. Not within the scope of
definition.
Time Series:
Over time risk can build op.
The macroprudential risk across.
Macroprudential Tools
ESRB does not have power to do anything else than analyze and communicate it findings to the
ESAs (competent authoritys). Its findings and recommendations are not binding. No legal sanctions
if not following – but have to explain why one is not following.
In EUROPE
ESRB Can be relating to Europe as a whole, or to a specific country or institution.
ESRB is inside the ECB
Wrap up:
Institutional isssues:
No legally binding.
Information
The only way to enforce the effectiveness of the ESRB is based on reputation and public opinion
when not complying with the ESRB.
Lesson 4
DGSD possibly becoming EDIS – has the single resolution board as authority.
The 2 pillar of the BU
Finacial stbility vs market discipline: a trade-off?
Market discipline: letting the market decide who is good enough to fail or not to fail.
BRRD: at very early stage interventions supposed to manage in early stages of a crisis.
SRM:
SRB: are responsible for the banks(big big banks with operating in a state that has euro as its
currency) which are under the first pillar. The powers of the SRB extends to the same banks that
are under the ECB
This directive is applicable to all EU states.
Prudential supervision is not to encompass
It is an agency.
Remove management: quite expressive that the public can go in a private bank and remove a
board member.
What is resolution?
2. No other way
a. Authorities ask around if anyone is interested in buying this
3. Public interest
a. We need to use resolution in order to achieve all the objectives, if your national
solvency law is not able to obtain the obejctives in art. 32 if national solvency law
can achieve the objectives use national solvency law.
Insolvency vs Resolution:
“no creditor worse off” principle
We need to take care of the crediors at the same time reaching the objectives of the resolution.
Fund is part of the second pillar, and is founded by the SRB. Collecting money from the banking
industry. The way it is collected is decided by the size and the riskiness of the bank. Bigger/riskier =
more contribution. We can't use the fund to rescue the bank.
The condition of this resolution to be adobted.
Price of the market.
SRF is supporting.
Art. 36 BRRD asses the net value of the firm then proceed with.
NCWO = no creditor worse off principle applies to all the tools.
Public institution, limited time 2 years +
Carve out the good.
36 BRRD evaluation has to be done.
A way to separate the toxic stuff from the bank.
Often if breach of law you end up here.
Possibility for the bank to get recapitalized by writing down and/or converting shares to debt
Purpose of bail-in: keep the bank floating.
Step 3 recapitalize and convert sub. And senior.
PIA = public interest assessment
The thing is: in banks, how interconnected banks are, and how prepared governments are to
rescue banks, creates an incentive for moral hazard, because you know someone is going to bail
out the bank.
Should also be linked to the systemic risk that the firm is posing.
The recent changes in capital regulation: is not only the capital related to the single bank but the
implications that adds on the macro perspective (the market).
Not binding at all. Basel III is the one changing the perception and approach.
The structure from Basel II and onwards.
Pillar 1 is integrated in pillar 2. In the sense that a certain process for the supervisor Is necessary to
check. Pillar 3, public disclosure: how are the banks doing etc. balance sheets.
How do we set the threshold: if we are in the shoes of the legislators/regulators?
- Emphasizing the riskiness of the banking business.
The amount cannot be a fixed amount, it has to be a percentage or “moving number in relation to
the risk and the amount”. (ratio)
Operational risk: everything that can go wrong relating to running the business.
1:
2:
This is the new way.
CRA = credit rating agencies.
Using the knowledge that banks have.
Ratio between the banks equity and the leverage the bank have. (max 3 percent)
The buffer is something you have to keep to keep running the business.
Procyclicality:
To keep your 8 percent, not increasing your quality but lending less out.
CET1 = common equity tier 1
CCB = capital conversation buffer
Different opinions on this buffer: some say it is not necerssary, but professor says it is necerssary.
It is requied by law.
Country decides which buffer to use
Applicable only to the banks that are qualified as: systemic importan banks.
Two main challenges
1. retail dposits
2. short term wholesale funding
a. secured short term funding (repos and swaps)(not an options to buy, has to buy)
b. unsecured short term funding (interbank deposits, commercial paper and certificate
of deposits.)
I. constrains on the composistion of the asset side, of the balance sheet:
To incurage banks to have more deposits than other short term debts.
HQLA = high quality liquid assets.
The test is based on a scenario
SHORT TERM
LONG TERM
Relies of the powers of the central bank.
Governments are capital providers of last resort. Whereas central banks provide liquidity.
One form: monetray policy: market liquidity assistance under the ECB as the monetary provide
Other form: measures that are directed specifically at a bank.
CRD article 78 – 88
1 pillar laws
SSM
CRD4()
2 pillar laws
SRM
BRRD(used in case of crisis)
The CRD4 directive uses the word “management body” = board of directors.
CRD 4 Art. 91
Three-lines of control/defence
Channel of communication between the internal and external world.
More of advisory activity. In conjunction with the risk management function.
Regularly checking that the bank is in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards
etc.
i.e. you have a deposit in bank, you get 1% interest. Then the bank changes to grant you 1.5 % the
bank does not inform you. But the consumer is in favour, so It applies. If they change something
without notifying the consumer and it is not in the favour of the consumer.
Automatic substitution.
Primary market: the IPO
In both markets mifid is the law
Arranger (often an investment bank)
The investment firm should take the steps to avoid conflicts of interest.
sad
Lesson 7
Rules about money laundering Developed at the international level.
Directive 91/308/EEC
Customer/client identification
Record-keeping
Methods of reporting suspicious transactions (to competent authorities)
Based on a precondition
We need the cooperation of the citizens for this to work effectively.
Even if you are making more transaction below 15.000 but are linked, the bank has to identify your
identity.
Two laws: one to prevent. And national law of the criminal offence money laundering.
Directive 2001/97/EC
Lawyers and such are only subject to the directive when they act in a specific manner
Directive 2006/70/EC
Important: passage from identification (first pillar) to due diligence, not limited to identifying but is
something more.
FIU = financial intelligence unit
FIU is at the epicenter and therefore has a lot of data to draw on.
Obligation arises when the entity knows, suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect money
laundering, terrorist financing.