Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revitalization of Kamaishi - Mitigation
Revitalization of Kamaishi - Mitigation
net/publication/327933120
CITATIONS READS
0 296
1 author:
Khuplianlam Tungnung
Amity University
39 PUBLICATIONS 61 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
EC4 Project : Make the planet great again, really, no bla-bla View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Khuplianlam Tungnung on 28 September 2018.
トウンノン クプリャンラム
1. Research Background and Aims When vulnerabilities meet hazard, disasters occur with damages
Post 3.11, a vulnerable valley town, Kamaishi is confronted with depending on the locality’s preparedness. This project’s responds
its morphological, economics and social challenges. This project to “What Revitalization does and what it is?” It empowers the
essentially seeks social and physical revitalization within the people and community and provides social and physical resiliency.
vulnerable lowland, Tobu without relocation. It also fulfills the The revitalization as a community based participatory planning that
citizens’ wish to live near their workplaces and the place they have aims to empower the people and community through participatory
built up over the years. Its holistic revitalization mandates physical planning to promote social kizuuna, design programs, festivals and
and social measures for pre-disaster and post-disaster conditions. remembrance. It is a resiliency measure through design expressions
The elderly ratio, above 64 years, 3.3% in 1955 and 31.2% in 2005 in the architecture and urbanism landscape and land-use planning.
necessitates creation of a “Society and Environment for all Ages”. Tobu district’s basic needs of social and structure resiliency, health
3.11 disasters damaged 4,548(28%) houses, 11k㎡ of urban area and renewable energy have to be accounted for. The micro
(2.4%) and 1228 people were missing or death (Fig: 1, 2). intervention measures like the city hall, memorial park and
Vulnerability, manmade or natural, like「危機, Kiki」, presents collective housing integrates and connects the social and physical
challenges and opportunities. resiliency requirements of the people.
Fig-1: Preconditions of damage existing in the project site, Tobu. Fig-2: Preconditions-Liquefaction, part damage concrete structure
2. Research Methods
2-1. Analysis of pre-conditions, challenges and opportunities
2-2. Environmental Performance Analysis by Computer Simulation
4. Proposals: Architecture
The micro architecture projects aims to respond to “What
revitalization is? and “What it does?” to rehabilitate a sustainable
resilient community. The concepts valorize “Reconstruction by the
People for the People” with the architects, engineers and
governments serving as enablers. Accordingly, based on the idea of
reconstruction as a way of rebuilding community bond, Kizuuna and
social resiliency, the City Hall is proposed first as a symbol of
resiliency and to be the locus of reconstruction initially and further Fig-6: Social plaza at ground use as per diurnal motion of sun and
serve as the centre of the evolution of the society’s needs, values Kids area for education with iPad mapping on floor at the center
Fig-8: A-Axis: Reflective Stainless Steel Cenotaph reflects sea to Fig-10: Improvised Gassho-zukuri style Collective housing with
mimic 3.11 and give self-experience of tsunami wave to visitors. terrace garden, veranda, engawa or piloti for collective usage.
Meteorologically, “Inner Garden ・ 坪庭” inspired large central
courtyard and the elevated building with pilotis will make way for
air changes to cool down the building, while primarily serving as a
community plaza. (Fig: 10, 11).