Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bsce 1-A, Diño, Lesson 2 Module 1 Uts
Bsce 1-A, Diño, Lesson 2 Module 1 Uts
Bsce 1-A, Diño, Lesson 2 Module 1 Uts
01 LESSON 02S
TH
T HE
E S
SEEL
LFF A
ACCC
COOR
RDD II N
NGG T
TOO
THHE
E P
PHH II L
LOOS
SOOP
PHHE
ERRS
S
d
T
Focus In what ways is it possible for you to “know” your self ? How will I you
1 know yourself?
WHAT I KNOW WHAT I WANT TO KNOW HOW CAN I LEARN WHAT I HAVE LEARNED
MORE I have learned that Plato and
I understand that I I want to know how Diomata have different
self is determined I can learn more by perspectives about the self of
can only know discovering the human. Plato believes that the self
myself if I will be and understand by perspectives of remains the same eternally, while
Diomata claims that the self of
true to my self by other people and some ancient mortal people can not remain
recognizing every what are their other philosophers about eternally. I also learned about the
concepts about it. the concept of the idea of three-part self which is the
parts of my identity reason, appetite, and spirit that we
and personality. self. need to understand and control so
we may fully know our self.
G
pa o t
ge o
6
PAGE
2 WEEK 02
Module 01 - LESSON 02
KEY WORDS Self as the source of knowledge and significance Self- key to live an examined life
Examined life- a life of purpose and value
I assume that the people around me, especially my family influences my answer to the focus
questions. My parents thought me that I can only know more about the self of other people if I know
their personality and character, not just by their appearance.
Your responses also likely reflected the cultural and religious environment in which you were raised.
Cultures that originated in Europe have tended to use a common religious and philosophical framework
for understanding the “self” that was first introduced by Socrates and Plato in ancient Greece.
It signifies that the self is more than just a body or appearance. It is the soul and mind that the
self is more into. Our body may change, or in the absence of it, but our true self will always G
remain and it will never change. pa o t
ge o
3
PAGE WEEK 02
3 Module 01 - LESSON 02
ty is tic
Reaulia
SOCRATES
SOCRATES
D lis
Second Realm
First Realm ideal forms
---- , the unchanging, eternal, perfect realm
includes the intellectual essences of the
changeable, transient, and imperfect, universe, concepts such as truth, goodness,
whereas the other realm is unchanging, and beauty.
eternal, immortal. ---examples of these ideal forms in the
--The physical world in which we live— physical world—
comprised of all that we can see, hear, ---we might describe someone as truthful,
taste, smell, and feel—belongs to the good, or beautiful. But these examples are
former realm. always imperfect and limited:
--All aspects of our physical world are ----ideal forms themselves that are perfect,
continually changing, transforming, unchanging, and eternal.
disappearing.
SOCRATES
SOCRATES Second Realm
Our souls strive for wisdom and perfection, and reason is the soul’s tool to
achieve this exalted state.
But as long as the soul is tied to the body (1ST REALM),
this quest for wisdom is inhibited by the imperfection of the physical realm,
as the soul is “dragged by the body into the region of th changeable,”
where it “wanders and is confused” G
pa o t
dragged in a world that “spins round her, and she is like a drunkard.” ge o
8
PAG
E
9 WEEK 02
Module 01 - LESSON 02
SOCRATES, PLATO AND FEMINIST
ON SELF
FOR
FOR DIOTIMA
DIOTIMA
Write the KEY
WORDS to help Thus, unlike the gods,
you remember a mortal creature cannot remain the same throughout eternity;
important IDEAS it can only leave behind new life to fill the vacancy that is left as it
from this passes away....
And so it IS NO WONDER THAT EVERY CREATURE PRIZES ITS OWN
KEY WORDS
OFFSPRING,
EVERYTHING IS INSPIRED BY THIS LOVE--
Mortal creature is THIS PASSION FOR IMMORTALITY
not permanent.
ELABORATE
Through prizing its
offspring, man can SO THEREFORE, base on Diotima's ideas, would it be valid to say that the
be immortal. immortality of the soul is just a concept of the mind which is due to man's
desire and passion for immortality? What do you think?
I think the concept of the immortality of souls is not just a concept of mind, but a concept of faith.
It may be true that the man has a deep desire to live immortally, but the belief that the soul is
immortal is in the heart of most human. It may be logically seen that there is no immortal human,
ELABORATE but the belief of human to immortality is what makes them immortal.
Plato is committed to the concept that the soul is immortal and remains the same throughout eternity.
How is this concept of the soul differs to that of Diotima? Compare and contrast Plato and Diotima's
concept of the soul.
PLATO DIOTIMA
UL
The SO ing
Plato believe in 1st and 2nd Realm, Diotima claims that mortal people
which states that human has body
d
can not remain the same eternally
accor d
and soul. The soul is always and the desire for immortality is what
immortal, and once the body dies,
to...
makes mortal people to believe in
the soul will continue to live the immortality of souls.
eternally.
pa Go
ge to
11
PAGE
WEEK 02
11
Module 01 - LESSON 02
Physical Appetite- These three elements of our selves are in a dynamic relationship with one
human biological another, sometimes working in concert, sometimes in bitter conflict
needs
•For example,
Spirit or Passion- we may develop a romantic relationship with someone who is an
basic emmotion intellectual companion (Reason),
with whom we are passionately in love (Spirit),
and whom we find sexually attractive, igniting our lustful appetites
(Appetite).
Or we may find ourselves in personal conflict, torn between
three different relationships, each of which appeals to a
different part of our self:
•Reason, Spirit, Appetite.
When conflict occurs Plato believes it is the responsibility of our Reason:
to sort things out
exert control,
re-establishing a harmonious relationship between the three elements
of our selves.
EVALUATE
Balancing Reason, Appetite, and Spirit
Describe an experience in your life in which you experienced a vigorous conflict between the three
dimensions of your self identified by Plato: Reason, Appetite, and Spirit. What was the nature of the
conflict? How was it resolved?
My family wanted me to take maritime course since most of them are seamen. My uncles, cousins, and
even the course of my father is related to maritime. They encouraged me to take the same course
since according to them, it is the fastest way of getting money. My reason made me to think that they
might be right. It is a really good opportunity for me since I will already have background on that course
because of their help. But deep in me, I wanted to take an engineering course, since I have always
been dreaming of becoming engineer someday and my passion in Math and building houses makes
me really want to achieve it, but engineering course is quite long to take. I really think about it, and I
came to a decision that I will take engineering course. I explained to them why I take this course, and I
think they understand me. I just need to prove them that I will be the first civil engineer in my family.
Describe an experience in your life in which Reason prevailed over Passion and Appetite. How was
Reason able to prevail? Did you gain increased wisdom from the experience?
Recently, I had feelings for this girl. I liked her because of her good attitude and great personality.
And what makes me so much interested about her is that she also have feelings for me. I think she is
more than what I deserve. But I knew that if I will be in a relationship with her, I will just have a hard
time in reaching out to her since we are quite far from each other, and my parents don't allow me to
be in a relationship right now. So, I decided to take step behind of my feelings and I rejected her. I
think I made the right choice because I can be able to focus on my studies and I became more aware
of my feelings and I learned that sometimes in life, love is not always the best option.
pa Go
ge to
13
0
PAGE WEEK 02
13 Module 01 - LESSON 02
It is very prejudice and gender biased to say that men are more rational while women are more emotional. In this modern
society, men and women have already given equal opportunities, and through this, their characteristics have been seen
equally. Many women are very logical and rational nowadays since they already proved it by thriving and being successful
in many fields like in politics, science, business, and even in sports, which only men do before. Also, most men nowadays
have been so open with what they feel. The only thing that makes men less emotional before is the thinking that they will
become "gay" if they show their emotions so much. Being emotional does not decreases masculinity, and showing your p Go
emotion is a natural aspect of human, which some men, including me, tend to believe at this time. ag to
e
10