Edmund Burke is considered the founder of modern conservative thought. In his 1790 work "Reflections on the Revolution in France", he argued that liberty requires order and caution should be taken with political change to avoid unintended consequences. Burke believed nations are complex systems and abrupt changes could undermine important traditions and institutions. His writings laid the foundation for conservative ideology which seeks to preserve existing social and political systems.
Edmund Burke is considered the founder of modern conservative thought. In his 1790 work "Reflections on the Revolution in France", he argued that liberty requires order and caution should be taken with political change to avoid unintended consequences. Burke believed nations are complex systems and abrupt changes could undermine important traditions and institutions. His writings laid the foundation for conservative ideology which seeks to preserve existing social and political systems.
Edmund Burke is considered the founder of modern conservative thought. In his 1790 work "Reflections on the Revolution in France", he argued that liberty requires order and caution should be taken with political change to avoid unintended consequences. Burke believed nations are complex systems and abrupt changes could undermine important traditions and institutions. His writings laid the foundation for conservative ideology which seeks to preserve existing social and political systems.
Miskelly, Matthew and Noce, Jaime. (2002). Political Theories for
Students: United States of America: The Gale Group, Inc Edmund Burke (1729–1797) is considered the founder of mod ern conservative thought. His “Reflections on the Rev olution in France” (1790) form the basis of conservatism as a distinct political ideology. Burke’s form, however, has been, and remains, a Western phenomenon, and con tinues to defend most values of Western society. Thus, over the years, the United Kingdom and the United States have become the greatest proponents of conser vatism, and even between these two great powers, con servative principles have differed substantially. Edmund Burke Noted politician, writer, and statesman Edmund Burke was the son of a Dublin attorney. He abandoned his own law studies in favor of literary work. After serving briefly as Secretary to the Marquis of Rock ingham in 1765, Burke entered parliament as a Whig, a member of the people’s party. These were times of great upheaval, marked by coercion of the American colonies, and accompanying corruption, extravagance, and reaction. Burke, who greatly respected the wis dom of the ages, fought for liberty in his writings and speeches. But the key element in his early and best works was that liberty must relate to order. This re quired a sound, constitutional, and consistent states manship that enlarged the bounds of liberty only with caution. To him, a nation was a great living society, its constitution an exquisite balance of social forces, premised on complex relations and history interwoven with its institutions. In the mid– 1770s, Burke spoke against proposals to tax the American colonies and to regulate the gov ernment of Massachusetts. He did not dispute that the imperial government had the right to take such actions, but he did question the worthiness of such rights. To make his point, Burke delivered two impassioned speeches in the House of Commons: one dwelt on the matter of American taxation by duties and the other urged a reconciliation between the imperial Parliament and the colonies. When the American War for Inde pendence did come, Burke opposed it; he perceived it a danger to the liberties of the colonies and, there fore, of all English subjects. The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was the most conspicuous development to coincide with Burke’s career. In 1790 he published Reflections on the French Revolution as a warning to fellow English subjects and admirers that the loss of monarchy and liberty could also occur in England, as it had in France, if preventive action was not taken. This most famous of his works went into an eleventh printing before the year ended and served to create an English response to the French Revolution. Burke retired from political life soon after his son Richard died of consumption (tuberculosis) in August, 1794. In 1796, he opened a neighborhood school school for foreign and immigrant children who would not oth erwise have been educated. Early the next year his health began to decline, and he died on July 9, 1797. Despite a move to have him interred, with public honors, in Westminster Abbey, Burke’s own will stipulated he be buried in the yard of the parish church of Beaconsfield. Because the balance and tranquility of a great na tion took so many years and so many components to achieve, Burke always argued against hasty change. He believed that only cautious and delicate adjustment to accommodate pressing events should be attempted, lest the unraveling of latent or unknown components that contributed to the whole would inadvertently cause its demise. Burke’s writings inspired many mon archs and leaders through their own confrontations with revolution or reform. His defense of preserving existing institutions and orders became the foundation for Western conservative thought. Theory in Depth True political conservatism argues that the sur vival of any institution such as marriage, the pledge of allegiance, or free enterprise, means it has suc cessfully served a need. Accordingly, its continuation is necessary for that society or government. Conserv ative statesman Benjamin Disraeli once argued that constant change should at least defer to “the manners, the customs, the laws, the traditions of the people.” That notion is at the heart of true conservatism. Con servatism is acutely sensitive to the cost of radical change or reconstruction; until the full consequences are understood, such changes may lead to harmful, un intended consequences or other negative or unantici pated effects. Conservatism vigorously defends the premise that not all people are equal. It supports the idea that all people are created equal with regard to personal free doms and rights. But it argues strongly for the inher ent inequality in talent and initiative. Conservatism considers it a folly to try to level society by social en gineering. Accordingly, attempts to distribute wealth evenly or give equal say to those who have earned no vested interest in a matter are clearly suspect. Persistent themes of traditional conservatism in clude a universal moral order sanctioned by organized religion, the primary role of private property and a de fense of the social order. On the other end is the crit icism that true conservatism is interested only in main taining existing inequalities or restoring lost ones. Essentials of Conservatism Conservatism endeavors to preserve the existing order or the continuance of existing institutions, prin ciples, and policies. Its cautious resistance to change is premised upon the belief that would–be reformers do not fully comprehend the interrelationship and in terdependency of their proposed change upon other el ements of the larger system in which it is a compo nent. English statesman Edmund Burke is most often credited with inspiring the form of conservatism that has its roots in the Western Hemisphere. American conservatism, although vacillating on a continuum, is generally characterized by economic conservatism (maintenance of a free–enterprise system without gov ernment interference) and social traditionalism (the upholding of values and principles as envisioned by the founding fathers). Theory in Action Perhaps nowhere has conservatism established deeper political roots than in the Western Hemisphere. Wherever the politics of tradition, wealth, and aris tocracy have been a historic force, one will find a strong conservative presence in government. Exam ples include the Tories or Conservative Party of Great Britain, the Republican Party of the United States, the prior Gaullists of France, the largely dominant Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) of Japan (which, despite its name, is conservative), and the Swatantra Party of India. Similar polities exist in other countries. In Italy’s May 2001 general election, the right–of–center al liance known as the Casa delle Liberta (House of Free dom) prevailed over the center– left coalition which had ruled the country for the five previous years. In Switzerland, run for more than a century with the Lib erals governing and the Conservatives in opposition a four–party coalition known as the “magic formula” now runs the government. Since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia has created a parliament. Its two main political forces are the conservative right’s Yabloko and a loose coalition of liberal parties known as the Union of Rightist Forces (URF). Iran has suf fered relatively bitter power struggles between con servatives and reformers since 1989.
Summary of The Individualist by Matt Zwolinksi and John Tomasi:Radicals, Reactionaries, and the Struggle for the Soul of Libertarianism: A Comprehensive Summary