Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Technology and Higher Order Thinking in Teaching
Technology and Higher Order Thinking in Teaching
Page 1
George Churchill PGCE Year 2
Introduction
Technology is a rapidly developing area of education and it is important nobody gets left behind.
Rather then creating barriers, technology used in education can be used effectively as a tool for
inclusion and support individuals needs, overcoming barriers of access to the curriculum. The
learners I support are all post 16 and each learner has unique individual needs to enable their
lifelong development. My learners are categorised under special education, a generic term used to
represent learners who have dif culties in learning and require more supported education to
overcome obstacles that negatively impact their development in education and life skills.
Dif culties in developing thinking skills has put my learners focus on rote memory rather then
complex thinking such as problem solving and decision making. There are many innovations with
technology that can support SEN and it has been suggested in the Journal of Special Education
Technology that technology can act as a cognitive prothesis, to create conditions for equal
It is also important to remember that technology alone does nothing and requires teachers with a
positive attitude to collaborate with learners and colleagues to put it into practice. The purpose of
my job is to promote independence and HOTS, which is central to any vocational programme or
curriculum at any level and indeed pervades all aspects of education. I am responsible to my
learners taking control of their environment and gaining independent living skills at NEAS. The
ability to exercise control over ones environment is an essential prerequisite for the development of
skills related to decision making and problem solving (Banes & Coles, 1994: p. 8).
Literature Review
The main concern in my role supporting learners with ASC is, does technology predominantly
occupy my learners rather then educate them? Cuban (2001) reported teachers view computers
as audiovisual equipment and do use them to support HOTS but tend not to drive and develop
them. There are many areas that can create barriers for my learners and making adaptations is an
essential role I must ful l to meet individuals needs. The most highlighted areas my learners need
Page 2
fi
fi
fi
George Churchill PGCE Year 2
and sensory/physical (Department for Education & Skills 2001: S7:52, p. 85). The Journal of
Special Education Technology has suggested that technology can act as a cognitive prosthesis to
create conditions for equal opportunity with the curriculum. ICT has huge potential to engage
learners HOTS and can provide opportunities for teachers to develop their CPD (Florian & Hegarty,
2004). By enabling technology, we as teachers are providing the basis for inclusion to aid and
develop HOTS, in my role some of my learners can struggle to form a character or word with a
pencil, but by introducing a keyboard (which can be modi ed to suit learners needs), my learners
can hit a key on a keyboard, empowering and enabling my learners to be able to ful l an everyday
task they once found beyond their grasp. Our current technology is made more inclusive and
portable to use in a variety of environments and this has changed the dynamics of education and
inclusion. It is obvious that technology is a great aid/resource that can overcome learners physical
Barriers to HOTS
SEN learners using ICT in mainstream education can be isolated, using technology resources
different from other learners can make them appear different to others and also exclude them from
group work, stunting both social and language development. Teachers are expected to incorporate
new technology equipment and software into their teaching with little or no training or support, but
only their own initiative to develop CPD in their social time. Maintenance of equipment also
requires expertise (maintain network, install/update software, PAC testing for safety) and so can
prove costly in both mainstream and SEN, this unfortunately relies on funding, those on low
funding can be excluded. Implementing or using software/technology for the rst time can also
lead to high levels of stress, technical issues can be behavioural triggers and upset or break
routine with some of my learners who then have a negative experience. In SEN learners often
leave education without developing HOTS that they can use as transferrable skills in employment,
they do not envision their interests and hobbies as having an actual profession. We as teachers
need to raise more awareness and implement strategies to make sure employable skills are
developed within our sessions that use technology. ICT can provide a platform that has structure
Page 3
fi
fi
fi
George Churchill PGCE Year 2
for working experiences while still in education, at NEAS we deliver sessions such as business
administration (book making, recipe building, newsletters), and these are skills that take place in
Assessment
SEN Code of Practice (Department of Education & Skills, 2001) stresses early identi cation of SEN
for intervention, these need strategies in place for screening and assessing. Assessment depends
on good diagnosis, which is not easy and can be time consuming, requiring previous experience in
SEN. Assessment is not a single event but a continuous one, but if early intervention encounters
problems you risk learners failing a lot, which can have negative impacts, these can have both
emotional and motivational repercussions such as learnt failure damaging con dence and causing
anxieties in the future. Fortunately, with the development and implementation of technology, we
now have computer based assessments in place to aid teachers, taking away human errors (CBA),
more reliable and also ef cient (Olsen, 1990), applying computerised adaptive testing in schools.
What CBA cannot provide is rst hand observation (mood, effort, health and emotion) as only
human observation can detect this, such things as visual discomfort, speech and language.
Dyscalculia screening for learning dif culties in numeracy can be more effective with CBA, so it
appears integrating both methods of assessment is bene cial rather then one or the other,
Positives to HOTS
There are unlimited advantages of using technology in education, but are they a long term bene t
to development? Poor phonic skills can be improved and aided through practice, linking in with
behaviourism theory. For example, word processing with computer aided speech feedback to
decode words unfamiliar to my learners does and can improve reading comprehension and
develop speech and vocabulary. Many of my learners within NEAS love to use new words and
learn pronunciations and meanings, they can be very inquisitive and eager to understand
Page 4
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
George Churchill PGCE Year 2
conversations around them and computer aided technology supports them. In our case software
such as Microsoft Word and Communicate and Print are positive resources that support my
learners and can also act as an assessment tool, as well as diagnosing areas such as cognitive
functioning and dyslexia etc. These can aid expressive language, improving social communication
and interaction that are fundamental to breaking down barriers in the wider community. These
integrated learning systems also provide instant feedback for staff and learners and can be applied
Areas that support my learners go beyond cognitive, speech and language. With technology also
aiding learners visually, physically and vocationally. Keyboards can be modi ed to have larger
letters or shaped to suit the individual learner and a mouse with the keyboard can aid motor control
and hand to eye co-ordination that enables learners in SEN to access writing, create pictures,
patterns, designs (card making/textiles etc) and produce or develop presentation skills (powerpoint,
person centred plans etc). Speech, images, words and animation can be combined in interactive
ways to structure concepts that suit levels of understanding for individuals to suit their interests that
can allow more independence and success when implementing HOTS. Again, not only does these
resourceful softwares and computer components develop my learners skills, they also provide
invaluable employment skills and experience in a world dominated by technology. The Internet is a
valuable resource to both staff and learners at NEAS and a brilliant research aid, with ready made
access available that is constantly updated and support our learners in a wide variety of sessions,
from building recipe books with new ideas to researching horticulture ideas and healthy living
sessions.
Virtual environments can aid independence (paying bills, accessing shopping, communication aids
etc), facilitating concept attainment through practical activities. Not only that, but virtual
environments also allow our learners to make mistakes but without suffering the real, social
humiliation or negative consequences of any errors that could take place in the community. Virtual
worlds like the Internet or software resources can also be manipulated by me and fellow staff to
support our individual learners with areas such as online shopping or accessing libraries where in
the community these environments are set and can be unpredictable (noises, colours, smells,
Page 5
fi
George Churchill PGCE Year 2
animals). By improving our learners chances of success we can then begin to develop these
sessions to promote and convey HOTS, enabling our learners to acquire independent living skills
that can be applied to real life environments like shopping and managing nances. Studies have
previously produced research that showed evidence of learners in SEN using virtual environments
to begin with, were far more equipped and prepared when developing these skills into real life
environments when shopping then their counterparts in mainstream education, who had never
used virtual environments (Standen et al, 1998). One of the standout technologies of our time that
has evolved massively and fruitfully is communication and networking. Rather then widen the gap
of exclusion areas such as emailing, video calling and social networking has developed inclusion
for my learners in SEN. These areas allow a safe environment for my learners to keep in touch
with friends and family and communicate feelings, emotions and daily activities to those close to
them, bridging the gap in previous generations of losing touch with loved ones and peers who lived
far away or could not make daily contact. This area of evolving technology is used daily in my role
when supporting learners, who love to email their parents with activities, sessions and
achievements providing a very inclusive resource for them and promoting independence and
HOTS.
Conclusion
At NEAS we focus on developing our learners needs to access information independently, solve
problems (aided by sabotage methods, Maslows Hierarchy of Cues etc) and improve decision
making. SEN is a generic term used to represent learners who have dif culties in learning and
require a more supported educational environment. Dif culties in thinking skills, focused more on
role memory rather then complex thinking such as problem solving and decision making as stated
previously, require resources, aids and structure that can support my learners. This has fostered
dependence on others such as care staff, support workers, family and colleagues due to learned
helplessness, almost as if the environment was set up for them to fail all along. If my learners are
to achieve more independence they need to attain higher order thinking skills through observing,
describing, organising, questioning, problem solving and time management (Lombardi & Savage,
Page 6
fi
fi
fi
George Churchill PGCE Year 2
2010: p27-31). Learning and behavioural dif culties can be experienced by any individual or
learner at any time and is not just in SEN. Technology is not a barrier and in many areas can act
as a tool for inclusion, aiding my learners visual, verbal and hearing impairments with such simple
modi cations such as changing size of font on a computer screen, adding text to sounds to aid
speech and concept of language or changing colours to control visual learning experiences that
Page 7
fi
fi
George Churchill PGCE Year 2
References
Cuban, Larry. Oversold And Underused. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press,
2001. Print.
DiGennaro Reed, Florence D., Sarah R. Hyman, and Jason M. Hirst. "Applications Of
Technology To Teach Social Skills To Children With Autism". Research in Autism Spectrum
Florian, Lani and John Hegarty. ICT And Special Educational Needs. Maidenhead,
Lombardi, Thomas P. and Luise Savage. "Higher Order Thinking Skills For Students With
Special Needs". Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth
"New UK Department Links HE, Innovation And Skills". Industry and Higher Education
Pierce, P. L. and P. B. Porter. "Helping Persons With Disabilities To Become Literate Using
Assistive Technology: Practice And Policy Suggestions". Focus on Autism and Other
Reece, Ian, Stephen Walker, and Caroline Walker-Gleaves. Teaching, Training And
Robinson, Denise. "Editorial: Teaching Standards, FELTAG And The I ". TiLL 6.1 (2014):
3-4. Web.
Page 8
fi
fl
George Churchill PGCE Year 2
Rose, Richard. "Special Educational Needs: A New Look". European Journal of Special
DEVELOP EXPRESSIVE WRITING SKILLS". Reading & Writing Quarterly 12.1 (1996):
59-75. Web.
Page 9