Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SSS (11199) & Gsis (8291)
SSS (11199) & Gsis (8291)
COLLEGE OF LAW
S.Y. 2021-2022
Submitted by:
Block 2I
Chapter II Government Service Insurance System Act of 1997 (R.A. No. 8291)
1. Summary of the Law 16
2. Purpose 16
3. Coverage 17
4. Compulsory Members 17
5. Effectivity of Coverage 18
6. Effect of Separation from Service 18
7. Intended Beneficiaries 18
8. Benefits 18
9. Dividends 24
10. Optional Insurance 24
11. Contributions 24
12. Members 24
13. Penalties 25
14. Supreme Court Decisions 27
Additional Topic
2
Chapter I
Social Security Act of 2018
Republic Act No. 11199
2. PURPOSE
The Social Security Law was enacted under the policy of the State to establish, develop,
and promote a sound and viable tax-exempt social security system suitable to the needs of the
people through the Philippines and provide meaningful protection to members and their
beneficiaries against hazards of disability, sickness, maternity, old age, death and other
contingencies resulting in the loss of income or financial benefits. Towards this end, the State
shall endeavor to extend. social security protection to workers and their beneficiaries.2
1
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p. 1
2
R.A. No. 11199, Section 2
3
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p. 1-2
4
R.A. No. 11199, Section 9(a)
3
v. Other self-employed persons as may be determined by the Social Security
Commission (SSC) under rules and regulations it may prescribe.
g. A farmer, fisherman, or a worker in the informal sector (IS)
Note: An IS member being defined as one whose income is irregular or seasonal and who
may be registered as a self-employed member under the SSS AlkanSSSya Program
h. An OFW not over 60 years of age (up his/her 60th birthday), whether land-based or
sea-based
3.2 Voluntary
a. Non-working Spouses who devote full time to managing the household and family
affairs, unless they are also engaged in other vocation or employment which is subject to
mandatory coverage;8
b. Filipino permanent migrants, including Filipino immigrants, permanent residents and
naturalized citizens of their host countries;9
c. Separated member: A member who is separated from employment or who ceased to be
self-employed, an OFW, or a non- working spouse, but still intends to continue paying
SSS contributions on his/her own account.10
5
R.A. No. 11199, Sec. 10
6
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p. 7
7
R.A. No. 10361, Sec. 30
8
R.A. No. 11199, Sec 9, par.(b)
9
R.A. No. 11199, Sec 9, par.(g)
10
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p. 1-2
11
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p. 7
4
the member failed to contribute, he/she may still be eligible for benefits and loan privileges,
provided he/she meets the qualifying conditions.12
12
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p. 7
13
R.A. No. 11199, Sec 8(j)(3)
14
R.A. No. 11199, Sec 8(j)(4)
15
IRR of RA No. 11199, Rule 12, Sec. 5(ii)(c)
16
R.A. No. 11199, Sec 8(e)
17
R.A. No. 11199, Sec. 8(k)
5
Note: The person designated by the member shall be someone who has a right to claim
for support from the deceased member under the Family Code of the Philippines, including
dependent children who have reached the age of majority.18
Retirement Benefit
1. The member must have at least 120 monthly contributions prior to the semester of
retirement; and:
2. Has reached 60 years old and is separated from employment or has ceased to be
self-employed, except:
a. In the case of an underground mine worker [R.A. No. 8558], at least 55 years old
effective 13 March 1998; and
18
Agrarian Law and Social Legislation, Paulino Ungos Jr, Paulino Ungos III., 2021 ed. p.482
19
IRR of R.A. No. 11199, Rule 21, Sec. 1
20
Agrarian Law and Social Legislation, Paulino Ungos Jr, Paulino Ungos III., 2021 ed. p.488
21
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p.8
22
Ibid.
23
Ibid.
24
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p.7
25
Ibid.
26
SSS Membership Primer, August 2019, p.8
27
IRR of R.A. No. 11199, Rule 27, Sec. 3
6
b. In the case of an underground or a surface mineworker [R.A. No. 10757], at least
55 years old effective 27 April 2016 28
3. Is at least 65 years old, except:
a. In the case of an underground mine worker [R.A. No. 8558] or a surface
mineworker [R.A. No. 10757], at least 60 years old,
b. In the case of a racehorse jockey [R.A. No. 10789], at least 55 years old effective
4 May 2016.29
Death Benefit
The member must have at least 36 monthly contributions prior to the semester of death
for the primary beneficiaries to be entitled to a monthly pension. If the member has no primary
beneficiaries, the secondary beneficiaries shall be entitled to a lump sum benefit equivalent to 36
times the monthly pension.30 A lump sum amount is also granted to designated beneficiary/ies
and legal heirs in the absence of both the primary and secondary beneficiaries.
If the required monthly contributions were not met, the member’s primary or secondary
beneficiaries shall be entitled to a lump sum benefit equivalent to the monthly pension times the
number of monthly contributions paid to the SSS or 12 times the monthly pension, whichever is
higher.31
Funeral Benefit
The funeral benefit may be paid either in cash or in kind, depending on the date of
contingency and may be adjusted by the Commission:
1. PHP 12,000.00, effective May 24, 1997;
2. PHP 15,000.00, effective September 1, 1998;
3. PHP 20,000.00, effective September 1, 2000; or
4. A variable amount ranging from PHP 20,000.00 to PHP 40,000.00, depending on the
member's number of contributions and AMSC, effective August 1, 2015. 32
Sickness Benefit
1. The member must have paid at least three (3) monthly contributions within the
twelve-month (12) period immediately before the semester of sickness or injury;
2. The member must have been confined for at least four (4) days either in hospital or
elsewhere;
3. The employed member must have notified the employer, or the SSS, if he/she is
unemployed, self-employed, or voluntary member, of the sickness or injury;
28
IRR of R.A. No. 11199, Rule 21, Sec. 2
29
Ibid.
30
R.A. No. 11199, Sec. 13
31
Ibid.
32
IRR of R.A. No. 11199, Rule 24, Sec. 2
7
4. The member must have used up all current company sick leave with pay for the current
year, if he/she is employed, except the sea-based OFWs.
8
The benefits payable under R.A. 11199 are not transferable and a power of attorney or
other documents executed in favor of any agent, attorney or any other person for the collection
thereof on their behalf is not allowed. The only exception is when the payee is physically unable
to collect the benefits personally.34
Employer’s Contributions
Beginning on the last day of the month when an employee’s compulsory coverage takes
effect and every month thereafter during his employment, his employer shall pay, with respect to
such covered employee, the employer’s contribution in accordance with the schedule provided in
R.A. 11199.39 The employer is not permitted to deduct, directly or indirectly, from the
employee’s compensation or recover from them the contributions made by the employers.
34
R.A. No. 11199, Sec. 14-A, Sec. 15
35
R.A. No. 11199, Sec. 17
36
Ibid.
37
R.A. No. 11199, Sec. 18
38
IRR of R.A. No. 11199, Rule 31, Sec. 3
39
R.A. No. 11199, Sec. 19
9
latest declaration becomes the new basis of the MSC. The contributions of those who earn PHP
1,000.00 monthly or below may be reduced.
Government Contribution
The Congress shall annually appropriate out of any funds in the National Treasury not
otherwise appropriated, the sums to meet the estimated expenses of the SSS for each ensuing
year as contribution of the government to the operation of the SSS and to assure the maintenance
of an adequate working balance of the funds of the SSS as disclosed by suitable periodic
actuarial studies to be made of the operations of the SSS.40 The SSS shall request the
Government for the appropriation of funds.
10.1 What is the method of collection and payment under R.A. 11199?
The SSS shall require a complete and proper collection and payment of contributions and
proper identification of the employer and the employee. The payment may be made in cash,
checks, stamps, coupons, tickets or other reasonable devices that the Commission may accept
and adopt subject to the guidelines it may issue.
11. WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATIONS OF THE PROVISIONS
OF R.A. 11199?
a. On False Statement, Representation, Affidavit, or Document: Penalties provided for
in Article 172 of the Revised Penal Code (Section 28 [a], R.A. 11199)
b. To Obtain or Receive Any Money or Check: Fine of not less than PHP 5,000.00 nor
more than PHP 20,000.00 and imprisonment for not less than six (6) years and one (1)
day nor more than 12 years.
c. To Buy, Sell, Offer for Sale, Uses, etc., Any Stamp, Coupon, Ticket, etc.: Fine of not
less than PHP 5,000.00 nor more than PHP 20,000.00 and/or imprisonment for not less
than six (6) years and one (1) day nor more than 12 years, at the discretion of the Court.
d. To Defraud, etc., Any Stamp, etc.: Fine of not less than PHP 5,000.00 nor more than
PHP 20,000.00 and/or imprisonment for not less than six (6) years and one (1) day nor
more than 12 years, at the discretion of the Court.
e. To Fail or Refuse to Comply with the Provisions of the Social Security Act of 2018
and its IRR: Fine of not less than PHP 5,000.00 nor more than PHP 20,000.00 and/or
imprisonment for not less than six (6) years and one (1) day nor more than 12 years, at
the discretion of the Court.
f. To Fail or Refuse to Register Employees or Self-Employed Individuals: Fine of not
less than PHP 5,000.00 nor more than PHP 20,000.00 and imprisonment for not less than
six (6) years and one (1) day nor more than 12 years
g. To Fail or Refuse to Deduct and Remit Contributions: Fine of not less than PHP
5,000.00 nor more than PHP 20,000.00 and imprisonment for not less than six (6) years
and one (1) day nor more than 12 years
h. Liability When Committed by Association, Partnership, Corporation or Any
Institution: Liable for the penalties provided in the Social Security Act of 2018 for the
offense
i. In the case of sea-based OFWs, the person/s having direct control,
management, or direction of the manning agencies, who are considered
40
R.A. No. 11199, Sec. 20
10
employers of sea-based OFWs: Liable for any act or omission penalized under
the Social Security Act of 2018 (Section 28 [f]) in relation to Section 9 (b)
i. Misappropriation of Funds: Penalty provided for Malversation of Public Funds or
Property under Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code
j. Failure to Remit Declarations to the SSS within 30 Days: Penalty provided for
Swindling or Estafa under Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code.
k. Demanding or Charging Fees: Fine of not less than PHP 500.00 nor more than PHP
5,000.00 and/or imprisonment for not less than six (6) months nor more than one (1) year,
at the discretion of the Court (Section 17).
Facts: CMS Estate, Inc. is engaged in the real estate business. It started doing business
with only six (6) employees on December 1, 1952. Its Articles of Incorporation was amended on
June 4, 1956 in order to also engage in the logging business. The certificate of the Company’s
amended articles was issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 1956.
On January 28, 1957, petitioner entered into a contract of management with one Eufracio
D. Rojas for the operation and exploitation of the forest concession The logging operation
actually started on April 1, 1957 with four monthly salaried employees. As of September 1,
1957, petitioner had 89 employees and laborers in the logging operation.
On August 1, 1958, petitioner became a member of the Social Security System with
respect to its real estate business. On September 6, 1958, petitioner remitted to the System the
sum of P203.13 representing the initial premium on the monthly salaries of the employees in its
logging business. However, on October 9, 1958, petitioner demanded the refund of the said
amount, claiming that it is not yet subject to compulsory coverage with respect to its logging
business.
Ruling: Because of the broad social purpose of the Social Security Act, all doubts in
construing the Act should favor coverage rather than exemption.
Prior to its amendment, Sec. 9 of the RA1161 provides that before an employer could be
compelled to become a member of the System, he must have been in operation for at least two
years and has, at the time of admission, at least six employees. It should be pointed out that it is
the employer, either natural, or judicial person, who is subject to compulsory coverage and not
the business. If the intention of the legislature was to consider every venture of the employer as
the basis of a separate coverage, an express provision to that effect could have been made.
Unfortunately, however, none of that sort appeared provided for in the said law.
Section 10 (formerly Sec. 9 of RA 1161), as amended by RA 2658 provides: Sec. 10.
Effective date of coverage. — Compulsory coverage of the employer shall take effect on the first
day of his operation, and that of the employee on the date of his employment. Applying the
provision of Sec. 10 of the RA 2658, petitioner is subject to compulsory coverage as of
December 1, 1952 with respect to the real estate business and as of April 1, 1957 with respect to
its logging operation.
11
GR. Nos. L-26712-16, December 27, 1969
Facts: Petitioners filed with the respondent Commission a petition praying for
condonation of assessed penalties against them for delayed social security premium remittances
in the aggregate amount of P69,446.42 for the period from September, 1958 to September, 1963.
In support of their request for condonation, petitioners alleged that they had labored
under the impression that as international organizations, they were not subject to coverage under
the Philippine Social Security System, but upon advice by certain Social Security System
officials, they paid to the System in October, 1963, the total amount of P81,341.80, representing
their back premiums for the period from September, 1958 to September, 1963. They further
claimed that the penalties assessed against them appear to be inequitable, citing several
resolutions of the respondent Commission which in the past allegedly permitted condonation of
such penalties.
However, the respondent System dismissed the petition the ground that "the Social
Security Commission has no power or authority to condone penalties for late premium
remittance, holding that in the absence of an express provision in the Social Security Act vesting
in the Commission the power to condone penalties, it cannot legally do so. Hence, the petition.
Ruling: The Court finds no error in the Commission's action. Remittance of contribution
to the SSS under Section 22(a) of the Social Security Act is mandatory. The Court explicitly
explains that no discretion or alternative is granted to the respondent Commission in the
enforcement of the law's mandate that the employer who fails to comply with his legal obligation
to remit the premiums to the System within the prescribed period shall pay a penalty of three 3%
per month. The prescribed penalty is evidently of a punitive character, provided by the
legislature to assure that employers do not take lightly the State's exercise of the police power in
the implementation of the Republic's declared policy "to develop, establish gradually and perfect
a social security system which shall be suitable to the needs of the people throughout the
Philippines and (to) provide protection to employers against the hazards of disability, sickness,
old age and death. In this concept, good faith or bad faith is rendered irrelevant, since the law
makes no distinction between an employer who professes good reasons for delaying the
remittance of premiums and another who deliberately disregards the legal duty imposed upon
him to make such remittance. From the moment the remittance of premiums due is delayed, the
penalty immediately attaches to the delayed premium payments by force of law.
On the petitioner’s contention that the respondent Commission had granted condonation
of penalties on delayed premium payments, the Court held that the past instances of alleged
condonation granted by the Commission are not, however, before the Court, and the unilateral
conclusion asserted by petitioners that the Commission had granted such condonations would be
of no avail, without a review of the pertinent records of said cases. That the Commission, in its
appealed Order of September 22, 1966 makes of record that since its Resolution No. 536, series
of 1964, which it reiterated in another resolution dated August 18, 1966, it had definitely taken
the legal stand, pursuant to the recommendation of its Committee on Legal Matters and
Legislation, that in the absence of an express provision in the Social Security Act vesting in the
Commission the power to condone penalties, it "has no power to condone, waive or relinquish
the penalties for late premium remittances which may be imposed under the Social Security Act.
No grave abuse of discretion was committed, therefore, by the Commission in issuing its Order
dismissing the petition for condonation of penalties for late payment of premium.
12
Philippine American Life Insurance Co. v. Social Security Commission
GR. No. L-20383, May 24, 1967
Facts: The Social Security System issued, with the approval of the Chairman of the
Social Security Commission, Circular No. 34 requiring all insurance firms to submit immediately
the names of their agents, solicitors or underwriters, who, pursuant to the Social Security Act, are
employees of said firms, subject to compulsory coverage of the System, and to pay the
corresponding premiums, based on the actual commissions received by each agent during each
month. Sometime later, the System sent to the Philippine American Life Insurance Company
communication enclosing therewith SSS Form R-1-A.1, advising plaintiff that, pursuant to said
Circular No. 34, the insurance agents thereof are considered its employees, subject to
compulsory coverage under said Act, and urging plaintiff to accomplish said SSS Form and to
submit the same, within ten (10) days, to avoid the penalties provided for by law.Instead of
complying, plaintiff objected to the aforementioned compulsory coverage upon the ground that
plaintiff’s insurance agents, solicitors or underwriters are not its employees.
After appropriate proceedings, the lower court rendered the decision to restrain the
System from compelling plaintiff to remit contributions to the administrative branch of the
System, as an incident of the alleged inclusion of plaintiff's agents, solicitors or underwriters in
the compulsory coverage of the System. The System maintains that decisions of the Commission
may not be reviewed by courts of first instance, not only because the two have the same rank,
but, also, because said decisions are, pursuant to the Acts reviewable by the Court of Appeals on
questions of law and fact, or by the Supreme Court, on questions purely of law.
Ruling: The Court ruled that the quasi-judicial nature of the functions of the Commission
is emphasized by its authority, expressly granted by said Section 5 (a), to promulgate rules and
regulations governing "the filing, determination and settlement of claims." Hence, the lower
court had no jurisdiction to issue the writ of prohibition prayed for.
Facts: The late Petronilo Davac, a former employee of Lianga Bay Logging Co., Inc.
became a member of the Social Security System on September 1, 1957. As such member, he
designated respondent Candelaria Davac as his beneficiary and indicated his relationship to her
as that of "wife". He died on April 5, 1959 and, thereupon, each of the respondents filed their
claims for death benefit with the SSS. It appears from their respective claims and the documents
submitted in support thereof, that the deceased contracted two marriages, the first, with claimant
13
Lourdes Tuplano on August 29, 1946, who bore him a child, Romeo Davac, and the second, with
Candelaria Davac on January 18, 1949, with whom he had a minor daughter Elizabeth Davac.
Due to their conflicting claims, the processing thereof was held in abeyance, whereupon the SSS
filed this petition praying that respondents be required to interpose and litigate between
themselves their conflicting claims over the death benefits in question. The Social Security
Commission declared respondent Candelaria Davac as the person entitled to receive the death
benefits payable for the death of Petronilo Davac.
Ruling: Without deciding whether the naming of a beneficiary of the benefits accruing
from membership in the Social Security System is a donation, or that it creates a situation
analogous to the relation of an insured and the beneficiary under a life insurance policy, it is
enough, for the purpose of the instant case, to state that the disqualification mentioned in Article
739 “The following donations shall be void: (1) Those made between persons who were guilty of
adultery or concubinage at the time of the donation” is not applicable to Candelaria Davac
because she was not guilty of concubinage, there being no proof that she had knowledge of the
previous marriage of her husband Petronilo.
Regarding the second point raised by appellant, the benefits accruing from membership
in the Social Security System do not form part of the properties of the conjugal partnership of the
covered member. They are disbursed from a public special fund created by Congress in
pursuance to the declared policy of the Republic "to develop, establish gradually and perfect a
social security system which shall provide protection against the hazards of disability, sickness,
old age and death." In short, if there is a named beneficiary and the designation is not invalid, as
it is not so in this case, it is not the heirs of the employee who are entitled to receive the benefits,
unless they are the designated beneficiaries themselves. It is only when there are no designated
beneficiaries or when the designation is void, that the laws of succession are applicable.
Facts: Judith Asiain sought to recover from respondent the death benefits she would have
been entitled to receive from the Social Security System had Poblete Construction Co., employer
of her deceased husband, had reported him to the System for coverage prior to his death, as
required by law. Petitioner argued that the Social Security Commission (the Commission) had no
jurisdiction over the case, as respondent’s husband was not covered by the System, and that the
subject matter of which should have been submitted in an ordinary civil action before the regular
courts.
Ruling: The case is under the jurisdiction of the Commission. In taking cognizance of the
petition filed by Judith Asiain, the Social Security Commission was exercising its quasi-judicial
powers granted by Section 5 (a) of Republic Act No. 1161, as amended.
It must be observed that in accordance with the provisions of Section 5, paragraphs (a)
and (c) of Republic Act No. 1161, as amended, the decisions of said Commission are reviewable
both upon law and facts by the Court of Appeals, and that if the appeal from its decision is only
on questions of law, the review shall be made by the Supreme Court. It is clear from these
provisions that the Commission, in exercising its quasi-judicial powers, ranks with the Public
Service Commission and the Courts of First Instance.
14
Franklin Baker Company of the Philippines v. Social Security System
GR. No. L-17361, April 29, 1963
Facts: Franklin Baker Company of the Philippines was engaged in the manufacture of
desiccated coconut. One of its employees was the deceased Tomas Zamora. They were
compulsory members of the Social Security System (SSS). The petitioner temporarily ceased its
operations from December 22, 1957 to February 18, 1958 due to the annual overhauling of its
machinery and also to lack of production orders. Zamora had no actual services during that time
and he went on sick leave w/o pay from March 9, 1958, up to the day of his death, June 13, 1958.
A death claim application was received by the SSS from petitioners for and on behalf of
Zamora’s designated beneficiaries. It was found out that he had no premium remittances for the
months of February, March and June, 1958. Because of the unpaid premiums, the employee was
also charged and Zamora’s share of the unpaid premiums was subsequently deducted from the
death benefits awarded to his beneficiaries.
Facts: The late Lim Hoc, a former employee of the Yuyitung Publishing Company, was,
at the time of his death on November 3, 1957, a member of the System, having qualified as such
on September 1, 1957. In the SSS-Form E-1 accomplished and filed by him with the System, he
gave his civil status as married, but made no mention of the members of his family or other
relatives. Instead, he designated the petitioner Jose P. Tecson, reportedly a friend and co-worker
of his, as his beneficiary. After the death of Lim Hoc, petitioner, in his capacity as the designated
beneficiary, filed with the System a claim for death benefits.
Ruling: Jose P. Tecson designation as a beneficiary is proper. The commission in its rules
and regulations states that “ In the absence of any of the foregoing relatives, any other person
designated by the employee. (Rule 7, [3], of the Rules and Regulations of the Social Security
System).” In this case Lim Hoc made no mention of his wife nor his family but instead wrote the
name of Jose P. Tecson as his beneficiary.
15
In re Catholic Archbishop of Manila v. Social Security Commission
GR. No. L-15045, January 20, 1961
Facts: The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila filed with the Social Security
Commission a request to exempt the "Catholic Charities, and all religious and charitable
institutions and/or organizations, which are directly or indirectly, wholly or partially, operated by
the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila from the compulsory coverage of RA 1161, as
amended, otherwise known as the Social Security Law of 1954. It contended that the RA 1161,
as amended, was a labor law and did not cover religious and charitable institutions but was
limited to businesses and activities organized for profit.
Ruling: The Social Security Law was enacted pursuant to the "policy of the Republic of
the Philippines to develop, establish gradually and perfect a social security system which shall be
suitable to the needs of the people throughout the Philippines and shall provide protection to
employees against the hazards of disability, sickness, old age and death." (Republic Act No.
1161, as amended). Such enactment is a legitimate exercise of the police power. It affords
protection to labor, especially to working women and minors, and is in full accord with the
constitutional provisions on the "promotion of social justice to insure the well-being and
economic security of all the people." Being in fact a social legislation, compatible with the policy
of the Church to ameliorate living conditions of the working class, appellant cannot arbitrarily
delimit the extent of its provisions to relations between capital and labor in industry and
agriculture.
Neither may it be validly argued that the enforcement of the Social Security Law impairs
appellant's right to disseminate religious information. All that is required of appellant is to make
monthly contributions to the System for covered employees in its employ. These contributions
are not in the nature of taxes on employment. They are intended for the protection of said
employees against the hazards of disability, sickness, old age and death in line with the
constitutional mandate to promote social justice to insure the well-being and economic security
of all the people.
Chapter II
Government Service Insurance System Act of 1997 (R.A. No. 8291)
16
2. PURPOSE
Under PD 1146, the law was enacted:
1. Because it is necessary to preserve at all times the actuarial solvency of the funds
administered by the GSIS;
2. Because it is necessary to guarantee to the government employee all the benefits due
him and to expand and increase the benefits made available to him and his dependents
to the extent permitted by available resources;
3. There is a need that the social security and insurance benefits of government
employees must be continuously re-examined and improved to assure comprehensive
and integrated social security and insurance programs that will provide benefits
responsive to their needs and those of their dependents in the event of sickness, disability,
death, retirement, and other contingencies; and to serve as a filing reward for dedicated
public service;
4. To expand and improve the social security and insurance programs administered by
the Government Service Insurance System, specifically, among others, by increasing
pension benefits, expanding disability benefits, introducing survivorship benefits,
introducing sickness income benefits, and eventually extending the compulsory coverage
of these programs to all government employees regardless of employment status.
17
4. Employees who are not receiving fixed monthly compensation and do not have
monthly regular working hours
18
Members with at least 15 years in service and below 60 years old at the
time of separation:
*Cash payment (Basic Monthly Pension x 18) and
**Old Age Pension = Basic Monthly Pension
19
Cash payment = Basic Monthly Pension x 18, and
Lifetime Basic Monthly Pension
ii. Disability suffered after separation from service by a member who has
paid 180 monthly contributions or 36 monthly contributions within the
5-year period immediately preceding his disability:
Lifetime Basic Monthly Pension
iii. Disability suffered after separation from service by a member who has
paid at least 3 years of service but has not paid the required minimum
contributions:
Cash Payment = Average Monthly Compensation x 100% x No. of
years in service
b. What is/ are the conditions for entitlement?
i. Members who suffer:
1. Complete loss of sight for both eyes
2. Loss of two limbs at or above ankle or wrists
3. Permanent complete paralysis of two limbs
4. Brain injury resulting in incurable imbecility or insanity
5. And such other cases as may be determined and approved by the
GSIS
c. What are the reasons for suspension of Permanent Total Disability Benefit?
1. When he is reemployed
2. Recovers from disability
3. Fails to present himself for medical examination when required by GSIS
● Permanent Partial Disability
a. What is the amount of benefits?
Cash Payment in accordance with the schedule of disabilities prescribed
by the GSIS
b. What are the conditions for entitlement?
i. Members who get incapacitated to work for a limited period because of
complete or permanent loss of any of a body part:
Any finger, any toe, one arm, one hand, one leg, one foot, one or both ears
hearing of one or both ears, sight of one eye, such cases as may be
determined by GSIS
ii. Be in the service at the time of disability or
iii. if already separated from service:
iv. Has paid at least 36 contributions within 5 year period immediately
preceding his disability, or
v. Has paid a total of at least 180 months contributions prior to the disability
20
If the disability requires more extensive treatment beyond 120 days, the
temporary total disability benefit may be extended by GSIS for a period not exceeding
240 days
b. What are the conditions for entitlement?
● Must be in the service at the time of his disability;
● If separated, must have rendered at least 3 years of service and paid at least 6
monthly contributions in the 12-month period immediately preceding his
disability; and
● Must have exhausted all sick leave credits
21
b. Even if separated from the service, he has at least 3 years of service and
has paid 36 monthly contributions within the 5 years immediately
preceding death; or
c. Even if separated from the service, he has paid 180 monthly contributions
prior to death.
Cash payment equivalent to 100% average monthly compensation for each year
of service he paid contributions or12,000, whichever is higher
a. With 3 years of service; and
b. He has failed to qualify in the prior 2 schemes.
22
LEP is the old insurance coverage issued to GSIS members who entered the government
service before August 1, 2003. New entrants in the government service, on or after August 1,
2003 are now covered by ELP.
8.10b What are the benefits of LEP?
If you are a LEP holder, you are entitled to the following benefits:
1. Maturity Benefit – the amount payable upon maturity of the endowment policy as
defined in the policy contract or the certificate of coverage and is equivalent to the
original amount of insurance, plus the supplementary and less all outstanding obligations.
2. Cash Surrender Value – the cash value of the policy earned during the term of the
insurance and is payable to members, less all outstanding obligations, when they resign
or separate from the service before the maturity of the insurance or when they incur
permanent total disability. This benefit has no prescription period under RA 8291.
3. Waiver of premiums due to PTD. Premiums that may become due and payable during
the period of the PTD shall be deemed waived and considered paid. PTD is caused by an
injury or disease that results in complete, irreversible, and lifelong incapacity to work or
to engage in any gainful occupation. Since the PTD benefit has a prescription period
underRA 8291, application for such should be filed within 4 years from the date of
disability.
4. Death benefit – the amount payable to designated beneficiaries or, in their absence, to
legal heirs upon the member’s death due to natural causes prior to the maturity of
insurance or during its continuance. This benefit is a life insurance claim. Accidental
Death Benefit – additional benefit equivalent to the amount of death benefit if the
member’s death is due to accident, as determined by the System and in conformity with
its policies. This benefit is also dubbed “double indemnity” for eligible members. Section
11.9.1 of RA 8291 states: “The GSIS shall pay the accidental death benefit upon receipt
of written notice within 30 days from the date of death of the member and due proof that
such death resulted, directly and independently of all other causes, from bodily injury and
while his/her insurance is in force, and that said death was caused solely by external,
violent, and accidental means and not intentionally caused or provoked by the member,
and occurred within 90 days from the date of the accident. ”
5. Annual Dividend – the sum of money paid to GSIS policyholders whose life insurance
has been in force for at least 1 year based on records submitted by the employer, subject
to the amount and conditions recommended by the GSIS Actuary Office and approved by
the GSIS Board of Trustees. Eligible members may still request payment of back
dividends that were unclaimed in previous dividend years by filling out a Member’s
Request Form.
6. Policy Loan – equivalent to 50% of the cash value of the policy that could be borrowed
by the member.
7. GSIS Retirement and Other Social Insurance Benefits
23
d. A regular GSIS member who opted to convert your existing LEP into ELP.
8.11b What are the benefits of ELP?
1. Termination Value – the accumulated amount earned based on premium payment while
the ELP is in force. It is equivalent to 25% of the monthly life insurance premium paid,
which can be withdrawn upon separation or retirement.
2. Death Benefit – equivalent to the last annual salary multiplied by 1.5. Compared to LEP,
ELP has higher death benefit as this is focused more on the financial support to the
family and beneficiaries of the deceased member.
3. Annual dividend based on the termination value and earnings of the Social Insurance
Fund.
4. Policy loan equivalent to 90% of the termination value.
9. DIVIDENDS
An annual dividend may be granted to all members of the GSIS whose life insurance is in
force for at least 1 year in accordance with a dividends allocation formula to be determined by
the GSIS.
11. CONTRIBUTIONS
It is mandatory for all employers to deduct each month from the monthly salary or
compensation of employees, the contribution payable by them and remit directly to GSIS, the
employer’s and employees’ contributions within the first ten days of the calendar month
following the month to which the contributions apply. All employers should also deduct the loan
amortizations from the fixed monthly compensation of its employees.
24
Life Insurance Retirement
Personal/ Employee 9% 2% 7%
Share
Special Members
Government employees who, based on the Constitution or by virtue of a special law or
charter, are covered under retirement schemes that are separate from the GSIS, funded by their
own agency or by the National Treasury, and recognized by the Department of Budget and
Management (DBM).
Special members are required to remit life insurance premiums only equivalent to 3% of
their basic salary. Members of the judiciary and constitutional commissions fall under this
category. The contribution of special members and their employers is shown as follows:
Total 6%
*Of the basic monthly salary
13. WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATIONS OF THE PROVISIONS
OF R.A. 8291?
a. On directly or indirectly participating in the commission of fraud, collusion,
falsification, or misrepresentation: Prisión correccional in its medium and
maximum periods and a fine of not more than ₱1,000,000
b. To obtain or receive any money or check: A fine of not less than P5,000.00 nor
more than P20,000.00 or by imprisonment of not less than 6 years and 1 day to 12
years, or both, at the discretion of the court.
25
c. Failure or refusal to comply with the provisions of RA 8291 or with the rules
and regulations adopted by the GSIS: A fine of not less than P5,000.00 nor more
than P20,000.00 or by imprisonment of not less than 6 years and 1 day to 12 years, or
both, at the discretion of the court.
d. Failure of the treasurer, officers, employees, or officials to include in the
annual budget the amount corresponding to the contributions, or who fails or
refuses or delays by more than 30 days from the time such amount becomes due
and demandable, or to deduct the monthly contributions of the employee:
Imprisonment from 6 months and 1 day to 6 years, and a fine of not less than
P3,000.00but not more than P6,000.00, and in addition shall suffer absolute perpetual
disqualification from holding public office and from practicing any profession or
calling licensed by the government.
e. Malversation of Public Funds and Property: 1) The penalty of prisión
correccional in its medium and maximum periods, if the amount involved in the
misappropriation or malversation does not exceed ₱40,000; 2) The penalty of prisión
mayor in its minimum and medium periods, if the amount involved is more than
₱40,000 but does not exceed ₱1,200,000; 3) The penalty of prisión mayor in its
maximum period to reclusion temporal in its minimum period, if the amount involved
is more than ₱1,200,000 but does not exceed ₱2,400,000; 4) The penalty of reclusion
temporal, in its medium and maximum periods, if the amount involved is more than
₱2,400,000 but does not exceed ₱4,400,000; 5) The penalty of reclusion temporal in
its maximum period, if the amount involved is more than 4,400,000 but does not
exceed ₱8,800,000. If the amount exceeds the latter, the penalty shall be reclusion
perpetua; And in addition shall suffer absolute perpetual disqualification from holding
public office and from practicing any profession or calling licensed by the
government.
f. Failure of an employee to remit the same to the GSIS within 30 days shall be
presumed to have misappropriated such contribution or loan amortization: 1)
The penalty of prisión correccional in its maximum period to prisión mayor in its
minimum period, if the amount of the fraud is over ₱2,400,000 but does not exceed
₱4,400,000, and if such amount exceeds the latter sum, the penalty provided in this
paragraph shall be imposed in its maximum period, adding one year for each
additional ₱2,000,000; but the total penalty which may be imposed shall not exceed
twenty years. 2) The penalty of prisión correccional in its minimum and medium
periods, if the amount of the fraud is over ₱1,200,000 but does not exceed
₱2,400,000; 3) The penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period to prisión
correccional in its minimum period, if such amount is over ₱40,000 but does not
₱1,200,000; 4) By arresto mayor in its medium and maximum periods, if such
amount does not exceed Forty thousand pesos (₱40,000):
g. Failure, refusal or delay of the payment, turnover, remittance or delivery of
accounts to the GSIS of heads of offices of the national government and its
political subdivisions, and the personnel of such offices who are involved in the
collection of premium contributions, loan amortization and other accounts due
to the GSIS within 30 days from the time that the same shall have been due and
demandable: Imprisonment of not less than 1 year nor more than 5 years and a fine
of not less than P10,000.00 nor more than P20,000.00, and in addition shall suffer
26
absolute perpetual disqualification from holding public office and from practicing any
profession or calling licensed by the government. They are liable civilly to the GSIS
or to the employee or member concerned in the form of damages, including
surcharges and interests. The liabilities shall be construed as waiver of the State of its
immunity from suit, hence, the mentioned officials and/or personnel may not invoke
the defense of non-suability of the State.
h. Failure of the Members of the GSIS Board, to ensure the collection or recovery
of all indebtedness, liabilities and/or accountabilities, in favor of the GSIS
arising from any cause or source whatsoever: Imprisonment of not less than 6
months nor more than 1 year or a fine of not less than P5,000.00 nor more than
P10,00.00 without prejudice to any civil or administrative liability which may also
arise therefrom.
Note: Criminal actions arising from violations of the provisions of this Act may
be commenced by the GSIS or by the aggrieved member, either under this Act or,
in appropriate cases, under the Revised Penal Code.
27
1985, a pterygium was already growing on the nasal side of the left eye. In such a case, the injury
caused on the left eye is considered as work-connected; hence, compensable.
Total disability does not mean a state of absolute helplessness, but disablement of an
employee to earn wages in the same kind of work or a work of similar nature, that he was trained
for or accustomed to perform, or any kind of work which a person of his mentality and
attachments could do. A person’s disability might not emerge at one precise moment in time but
rather over a period of time. It is possible that an injury which at first was considered to be
temporary may later on become permanent or one who suffers a partial disability becomes totally
and permanently disabled from the same cause as in the case at bar. Unfortunately, the
petitioner’s permanent disability has further deteriorated affecting also the vision of his left eye.
The aggravation of the petitioner's condition arose from the same injury or disability. The
petitioner was compelled to retire from work on account of the blindness of his right eye. With
the gradual loss of vision of his left eye, it would even be more difficult, if not impossible for the
petitioner to be gainfully employed now.
Pauig vs GSIS
GR No. 210328, January 30, 2017
Facts: Respondent Pauig started working in the government service as casual status in
February 1964, temporary employee in July 1972 and permanent employee in July 1977 and
became a GSIS member in August 1977. In November 2004, he retired from the service upon
reaching the mandatory retirement age of 65 years old with the total length of service on record
as 27 years. Disagreeing with the computation of 27 years, Pauig wrote a letter-complaint to the
GSIS, arguing that his first14 years in the government service had been erroneously omitted.
RTC ruled in favor of respondent, as relied on Policy 2 of Policy and Procedural Guidelines No.
171-03 dated February 2, 2003, which states: "Services, for purposes of computing all the
benefits that a member may secure from GSIS shall mean only such services rendered by a
member in any government agency, whether national, local or government-owned or controlled
corporation under the following conditions: The member was receiving a fixed basic monthly
compensation for such services. The corresponding monthly premium contributions were timely
and currently remitted or paid to the GSIS." The tribunal explained that it is clear from the
aforequoted provision that the word "service" is not qualified and does not refer only to service
with a permanent status. Thus, the instant petition.
Ruling: GSIS should not include Pauig's first 14 years in government service for the
calculation of the latter's retirement benefits claim. In order to bring life to the true intention of
the law, however, Policy and Procedural Guidelines No. 171-03 must be read together with other
laws pertinent at the time of the contested period of service. Republic Act (R.A.) Nos. 4968 and
660, amending C.A. No. 186, thus: SEC. 4. Scope of application of System.-(a) Membership in
the System shall be compulsory upon all regularly and permanently appointed employees,
including those whose tenure of office is fixed or limited by law; upon all teachers except only
those who are substitutes; and upon all regular officers and saluted men of the Armed Forces of
the Philippines: Provided, That it shall be compulsory upon regularly and permanently appointed
employees of a municipal government below first class only if and when said government has
joined the System under such terms and conditions as the latter may prescribe. The Court finds
that the language of the retirement law is clear and unequivocal; no room for construction or
interpretation exists, only the application of the letter of the law. The primordial reason why
28
there were no deductions during those 14 years was because Pauig was not yet a GSIS member
at that time. There was thus no legal obligation to pay the premium as no basis for the remittance
of the same existed. And since only periods of service where premium payments were actually
made and duly remitted to the SIS shall be included in the computation of retirement benefits,
said disputed period of 14 years must corollarily be removed from Pauig's creditable service.
Chapter 3
Limited Portability Law
1. WHAT IS PORTABILITY?
Portability refers to the transfer of funds for the account, and benefit of a worker who
transfers from one system to the other41. The term system herein refers to SSS or GSIS. It refers
to instances where a worker transfers from private employment to government employment, and
vice versa, thereby transferring from being SSS member to GSIS member, and vice versa.
The transfer of funds is to ensure that his/ her years of service are duly credited.
41
(Section 1(b), Rule Ill of R.A. No. 7699)
42
Chan, Joselito, Bar Reviewer on Labor Law, 2017 3' Revised Edition, pg. 445
43
Chan, Joselito, Bar Reviewer on Labor Law, 2017 3' Revised Edition, pg. 445
44
Section 5, Rule V of R.A. No. 7699
29
5. WHAT ARE CONSIDERED CREDITABLE SERVICES?
For the public sector, the following shall be considered creditable services:
1. All previous services rendered by an official/employee pursuant to an appointment
whether permanent, provisional or temporary.
2. All previous services rendered by an official/employee pursuant to a duly approved
appointment to a position in the Civil Service with compensation or salary
3. The period during which an official/employee was on authorized sick leave of absence
without pay not exceeding one year;
4. The period during which an official or employee was out of the service as a result of
illegal termination of his service as finally decided by the proper authorities; and
5. All previous services with compensation or salary rendered by elective officials.
In the case of Gamogamo v. PNOC Shipping and Transport Corporation,45 the pivotal
issue was whether, for the purpose of computing an employee's retirement pay, prior service
rendered in a government agency can be tacked on and added to the creditable service later
acquired in a government-owned and controlled corporation without original charter. Petitioner
Gamogamo was first employed with the Department of Health for 14 years until he resigned.
After which, he was employed by a private domestic corporation. Said corporation was
subsequently acquired by PNOC Shipping and Transport Corporation. Respondents then
implemented a Manpower Reduction Program under which, retrenched employees shall receive a
two-month pay for every year of service. Petitioner requested to be included in the next
retrenchment schedule, but was declined, hence the complaint for full payment of his retirement
benefits, and that his service with DOH should have been included in the computation of his
years of service. The Court ruled in the negative.
The Supreme Court stated, to wit: "Petitioner's contention that the principle of tacking of
creditable service is mandated by Republic Act No. 7699 is baseless. Obviously, totalization of
service credits is only resorted to when the retiree does not qualify for benefits in either or both
of the Systems. Here, petitioner is qualified to receive benefits granted by the Government
Security Insurance System , if such right has not yet been exercised.
Under this law, retirees may combine their years of service in the private sector
represented by contributions to the Social Security System with their government service and
contributions to the GSIS to satisfy the required years of service under PD 1146 and RA 8291.
However, if retirees have already satisfied the required years of service under the SIS retirement
option they have chosen, they would not be allowed to incorporate their contributions to the SSS
anymore for availment of additional benefits. In case of death, disability and old age, the periods
of creditable services or contributions to the SSS and GSIS shall be added to entitle retirees to
receive the benefits under either PD 1146 or RA 8291.
If qualified under R.A. 8291, all the benefits shall apply except the cash payment. The
Portability Law provides that only benefits common to both Systems shall be paid. Cash
payment is not included in the benefits provided by the SSS.
45
Gamogamo v. PNOC Shipping and Transport Corp., G.R. No. 141707, May 7, 2002
30