Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reviewer (Practical Research)
Reviewer (Practical Research)
- It prefaces the study by providing a summary of the main idea and usually short and concise.
It should be:
- States the area of concern of the research paper whether it is a circumstance needing
development, a difficulty requiring attention, or an inquiry necessitating an answer.
- It sets the direction of the research study as it provides the foundation for the research
hypothesis and defines what kind of research study is suitable to address the problem.
External Criteria:
Internal Criteria:
I. Introduction
a. Rationale – the reasons of the conduct and also narrates incidences from international to local
scenarios.
b. Setting – the distinctive characteristics of the geographical location of the place where the study
is to be conducted.
c. Literature Foundation – the definition and the description of the major variables must be done
through analyzing literatures.
d. Urgency – must be proven by citing statistical evidences.
e. General Objective – general statement of the problem.
f. General Purpose – benefit or significance of the study.
- It is the heart of the paper – the statement of the general and the specific problems.
Creswell and Clark (2014) provide the following criteria in writing the purpose statement:
1. Non-researchable questions - these are the questions of values and are answerable by yes or no.
2. Researchable questions – these are the questions of opinion, perceptions, or policy that are
raised to accumulate data.
Characteristics of Variable
Kinds of Variables
1. Continuous variables – have an infinite number of values and may vary widely among the
research participants.
2. Discrete variables – have specific limits to their value.
3. Categorical variables – these cannot be expressed in numbers but are given in non-quantitative,
descriptive terms.
Possible Limitations
1. Sample Size
2. Lack of available and/or reliable data
3. Lack of prior studies
4. Chosen data collection method
5. Nature of the Information collected
1. Access
2. Time Period
3. Bias
4. Language
Should clearly discuss the purpose that the research will serve to society, the country, the
government, the institution or agent concerned, the curriculum planners and developers, and
the research community.
Review of Literature
The Review of Literature is the process of compiling, classifying, and evaluating what other
researchers have written on a certain topic.
The review of literature is a crucial aspect of research and serve the following purposes:
Steps in Reviewing
Types of Reading
The investigator’s reading skills are essential in conducting the review of literature. In the book,
Research in Nursing, Wilson (1990) identifies four types of reading:
1. Elementary Reading
- It consists merely of the recognition of letters and basic sounds and the literal comprehension of
sentences.
2. Systematic Skimming
- In this type of reading, the researcher should establish a system through which he/she can
maximize time in searching for relevant literature.
3. Analytic Reading
- In this stage of reading, the researcher must critique the contents of the materials.
4. Comparative Reading
- It is the highest level of reading which requires the reader to place what he/she is currently
reading in relation to other materials he/she has previously read.
Strategies in Reading
Previewing
- It is the process of reading to get a general idea of the things to look for in the text.
Highlighting
- This is done by physically marking the text to identify key details and note the relationships
among ideas.
Annotating
Books
Encyclopedias
Published Journals
Newspaper and Magazines
-It does not only restate facts but rather critique and highlight their relevance to the research.
1. Introduction
2. Body
3. Conclusion
1. Provenance
2. Objectivity
3. Persuasiveness
4. Value
The gathered studies are related to the present study when they have the following similarities:
1. The name of the author, the date, and the setting of the study
2. The title
3. The salient findings