Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Coca Cola Script
Coca Cola Script
Coca Cola Script
Consent to have an unaffiliated third party host run a page in the name of TCCC,
optionally make it an “official page” in its own name and hope to migrate fans to
there.
Rapid growth of fanbase on the page was due to the fact that Sorg and Michael were very
active and expressive.. it was more a technically sophisticated site than most of the fan
productions. Italy, Chile, France had more fans on this site than the US.
Risks involved
Firstly, it would be undesirable for TCCC to stop a fan page with so many followers.
However, consenting on having Dusty and Michael run the page is risky since TCCC
then no longer controls the message that is marketed through this page. An
independently run page might damage Coca-Cola’s marketing strategy.
Straight takeover of the page can be viewed by the fan base as an invasion of their
community by a domineering marketer.
Negotiating a transfer with the current owners seems like a good option, but it is
possible that (at the expected growth rate) the page will soon be so large that it does
not fit with TCCC’s aim to be able to communicate with the customers individually
instead of mostly broadcasting communication one-way.
The advantage of the situation now is that there is already a substantial marketing
value without TCCC having to invest a single dollar. A disadvantage is that it might
cause TCCC to lose some control over their own marketing and thus not being able to
effectively follow their own marketing strategy
Slide 6-
Paid media
Owned Media
Earned media
Shared media
In 2006, Voltz and Grobe posted a video on their website Erpybird.com showing
geysers made by dropping mentos candy into bottles of Diet Coke. Within 9 days of
posting the video, it has been viewed 2 million times.
Mentos was quick to respond and contacted the duo that same week offering to
sponsor the Eepybird antics.
After Donnelly joined TCCC, he formed a partnership with Voltz and Grobe.
He started the second instalment in the geyser series called “The Extreme Diet Coke
and Mentos Experiments: The Domino Effect.”
Guinness world records were set by activating hundreds of geysers and sales of coco-
cola and mentos scaled up by 15% and 25% respectively compared to the previous
years.
Slide 8- Difference between the two instances:
If we compare this situation with the Diet Coke and Mentos video, it shows apparent
similarities.
However, a difference is still that the Diet Coke and Mentos video was based on a
single hype providing a marketing opportunity with limited sustainability.
The video could function as a publicity stunt with much attention during a short
period of time, where a Facebook page could form the basis long-term customer
communication platform.
The Diet Coke and Mentos video demanded a quick response to gain maximum
publicity, while the Facebook matter demands an approach that sustains TCCC’s
long-term marketing strategy.
Coco- Cola –
FB Page created by: fans (Sorj & Jedrzejewski)
Goal: to share interest, connect, and engage the brand with its followers.
Starbucks –
Page created and controlled by: Starbucks Coffee Co.
Goal: to promote awareness and drive sales through exclusive promotional offers for
all followers