Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Apresentação Training in The ILO Classification ICOH 2009
Apresentação Training in The ILO Classification ICOH 2009
CLASSIFICATION OF RADIOGRAPHS
FOR THE PNEUMOCONIOSIS IN
BRAZIL, 1994-2007
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
er
ai
s
Sa
nt
a
Ca
ta
r in
a
Ri Ba
o hi
de a
Ja
Pe ne
rn ir o
am
bu
co
Es
pi
ri to
Sa
nt
Ri
o o
G
ra
nd
Ri e
o do
G N
ra or
nd te
e
do
M
Brazilian states of medical practice
at Su
o l
G
ro
ss
o
Se
gi
pe
Ac
re
94
20
68
34
States with more trained physicians
State n Responders (%)
MG 94 46 (49)
SP 68 20 (29)
PR 34 8 (23)
RJ 20 6 (30)
Results
30 28
25
20 18
15 12
10
0
Radiologia Medicina do Trabalho Pneumologia
Physicians practising more than one specialty - first reference
Physicians practising more than one specialty - second reference
25 20
2520 15
15 20 11
2010
5 2 2 2 1
15 0
9
10
ia
ia
l
al
o
ga
og
lh
og
er
Le
ba
ol
ol
di
a
um
na
ia
Tr
Ra
rg
2 2
ici
e
do
1 1 ru
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Pn
ed
Ci
na
M
0
ici
ed
M
ab al ho molo gmiaputu ra sc opi a Geranlo mis taeri atria siv is ta por tiv aa Leg al S ono di
ia a
olog a tologUi rolog
ia
T r u o gia o G e n s i n do a
i n a do Pne Ac u c
Br on Ciru Er
r g Int i ci na EMedi c
d edi ci na
R Reum
i c e M
Med M
Institutional link
60
Private
Public sector
sector
35 25 50
33
31 22
29
30 19 19 26
20
40 17
25
19
20 15 13
16
3015
n
15 10 11
10 20 5
5 3 5
5
0 0 10
Basic UnitsPrivate
Industry Ref Center
OSHinfirm Hospital
Expert University
Radiology Foudation Private
Private Compensation
Hospital Others
Others
OH 0OH WH clinic clinic board
university
physician physician Public Private Both
How often do you apply the classification?
60 54
50
40
28
30
20 15 13
10
0
Weekly Monthly Occasional Do not use
Refered problems
• The quality of the chest films to be analysed
is poor
• There are few available experienced readers
to discuss cases
• There is a poor comparability of the
analysed chest films with the ILO Standard
Set
• Feeling insecure in applying the
classification
Conclusions
• ILO training seminars are sought mainly by
radiologists, occupational medicine practitioners,
pneumologists and clinicians
• Selection of participants for the training seminars
should be improved
• Opinions regarding duration and sufficiency of the
training seminars depend on the medical background
of physicians
• The interest in responding the questionnaire is linked
to a routine in using the classification and, possibly,
to demands from normative/inspection bodies
Conclusions
• There is an urgent need of improving chest
X-ray quality in the periodical evaluation of
workers exposed to mineral dusts
• There is a need of creating efficient and
effective channels of communication for
physicians interested in the ILO
classification, as well as means of
continued/refresh training in the subject
Actions taken
• Set up of a group composed of
representatives of 3 medical societies, plus
Ministries of Health, Labour, Welfare and 2
invited experts to discuss
Criteria for physician’s admission for training
Training contents
Training schedules
Certification and recertification
Recommendations
• It is recommended that ILO make available
informations on accepted forms of training in the
ILO classification and, of levels of training
(Example: definitions of a “trained reader”,
“certified reader”)
• It is recommended that forms of assessing
proficiency of readers should be make available
• It is recommended that institutions/countries make
available self-training sets for continued/refresh
training (as the NIOSH Syllabus)