TEAM SENIOR CITIZENS

EDIOTRS- UDITI AND BANDANA

INTERN INTENSI EXTENSI CASE NEWS NEWS UPDATE-2 BLOGS

VE VE COMMENT UPDATE-1
RESEARC RESEARC ARY
H H
Mohd. People Most State of M. 1. Enviro 1. Environ Remedying the
Fuad should famous P. v. Bharat nmen mental emerging trend
have the criminal Singh AIR tal law v/s of “Hate Speech”
right to offenders 1967 SC under IPC
laws develop
clean in history 1170
drinking
vs ment:
water devel the
opme agents
nt of
goals framewo
of the rk,
state: develop
Are ment
they and
mutua impleme
lly ntation
benefi
cial or
bulwa
rks to
overal
l
econo
mic
growt
h?

Pratyay Should How the K. S. 1. Learni 1. Climate Human

Raj abortion environm Puttaswamy ng to Change- Trafficking – A
be legal ent v. Union of co- Global growing crime
globally? affects India AIR remedied under
exist warming
the level 2017 SC IPC – Case
of crime 4161
with - Green Studies and
wildlif House Survey Reports
e: Effect-
How Analysis
India
is
settin
g new
bench
marks
of
huma
n and
wildlif
e
peace
ful co-
existe
nce?
Priyansh Israel and How Pramati 1. The 1. Significa “NRI”- Subjected
u Palestine many Educational future nce of to IPC
conflict: people & Cultural of PPP and
whose break the Trust v.
sustai Precauti
actions law Union of
are legal? without India AIR
nable onary
even 2014 SC living. Principle
knowing 2114 How s- Critical
it the Analysis
enviro with
nmen Cases
tal
laws
can be
streng
thene
d to
achiev
e the
same?

Priyansh The role Do laws A. K. Roy v. 1. Literat 1. Preventi Laws under IPC
u Kumar of the actually Union of ure on of governing the
Hague prevent India (1982) revie Cruelty “Employer-
Internatio crimes? 1 SCC 271 Employee”
w of to
nal Court relationship
of Justice
the Animals
global Act-
warmi Overvie
ng w
and
the
green
house
effect
s

Rajat The Cybercri Joseph Shine 1. Make 1. Environ Scope of

Awasthi ethical me v. Union of a ment “Mental Health”
obligatio regulatio India AIR comp Impact under “Public
n of ns are 2018 SC Health” in IPC
arativ Assessm
NATO to falling 4898
Afghanist behind
e ent in
an new study India
technolo on the
gies enviro
nmen
tal
laws
of the
count
ries
that
succe
eded
and
failed
in
their
carbo
n
emissi
on
effort
s for a
sustai
nable
living
Ridhi Jain )Which Why do Navtej Singh 1. Bio- 1. Environ Honour Killing –
condition we need Johar v. plastic mental In light of the
s have to better Union of a Protectio recent
be met regulatio India (2018) judgement
sustai n and
for an ns 10 SCC 1
internatio regarding
nable Law of
nal personal choice Torts
interventi informati for
on to on the
take future
place? of
manki
nd-
the
oppor
tunitie
s and
obsta
cles in
the
mass
scale
produ
ction
of bio-
plastic

Sahej Cybercri How to Common 1. The 1. Environ Revisiting Mercy

Sehgal me prevent Cause v. enviro mental Killing – a study
regulatio wrongful Union of nmen Protectio of the Indian
ns are convictio India AIR Framework
tal n and
outdated ns and 2018 SC
and undo the 1665
laws Indian
here’s damage revolv Constitu
why ing tional
aroun Law
d the
usage
and
dispos
al of
variou
s
types
of
plastic
s in an
emerg
ing
econo
my of
your
choice
 Sahil Different How can Anita 1. How 1. The Mob Attacks and
Kumar types of governm Kushwaha v. the Relevanc Lynching – the
crimes ents use Pushap enviro e of the need for reform
people legal Sudan AIR
nmen Doctrine
commit regulatio 2016 SC
online ns to 3506
tal of
lower laws Intergen
crime of erational
rates India Equity
miser
ably
failed
to
stop
illegal
sand
minin
g in
the
count
ry?

Shrayans )What are What Lalita Kumari 1. Climat 1. M C Sedition – the

h the rights do v. Govt. of U. e Mehta used weapon of
Raghuva sanctions citizens in P. AIR 2014 chang and the Government
for the US SC 187
nshi e and develop
identity have
theft when
the ment of
they are ozone Environ
detained layer: mental
A Jurispru
cause dence in
and India
effect
study

Shreya People What are Maneka 1. Enviro 1. CONVEN Highlighting the

Gupta should be the laws Gandhi v. nmen TION ON difference
educated that Union of tal HUMAN between “Fraud”
better on regulate India AIR and “Dishonesty
crime ENVIRO
cybersecu police 1978 SC 597
rity laws interrogat
and NMENT-
ion the
law:
by
taking
into
accou
nt the
most
recent
cases
 Shruti What are How Rustam 1. the 1. ENVIRO Protection
Chaurasi the laws criminals Cavasjee role of NMENTA accorded to
a and use Cooper v. intern L special
punishme insanity Union of categories under
ationa CRIMINA
nts on defense India AIR IPC
digital as a 1970 SC 564
l law LITY,-
piracy loophole couns
el on
consci
ous
ecolog
ical
restor
ation

Simran Things How A. K. 1. Make 1. PIL Offences against

Gulla victims education Gopalan v. an CASES - transgenders
should do can State of assess ENVIRO
right prevent Madras AIR
ment NMENTA
away people 1950 SC 27
after from
on the L
being breaking fairne PERSPEC
hacked laws ss of TIVE.
the
intern
ationa
l
enviro
nmen
tal
law
towar
ds the
mana
geme
nt of
the
natur
al
resour
ces in
emerg
ing
econo
mies

Sneha The way Why do Himat Lal K. 1. A 1. COMPAR Outraging the

Lohat biometric certain Shah v. critica ATIVE modesty of a
s affect countries Commission l ANALYSI woman –
cybersecu still have er of Police, Analysis in light
assess S OF M.C
rity capital Ahmedabad of recent
punishme AIR 1973 SC
ment MEHTA judgements
nt 87 of the CASES
Indian ON
 enviro ENVIRO
nmen NMENTA
tal L
law PERSPEC
for TIVE.
the
sustai
nabilit
y of
the
resour
ces
and
mana
geme
nt

Riya Differenc The Sahara India 1. A 1. MUNICIP . Marketing

Chaudhry es connectio Real Estate syste AL SOLID Frauds
between n Corp. Ltd. v. matic WASTES
private between SEBI AIR
analys (MANAG
and crime and 2012 SC
public drugs: 3829
is of EMENT
policing how the AND
different critica HANDLI
laws can l NG)
help comp RULES.
onent
s of
the
intern
ationa
l
enviro
nmen
tal
law
IMPORTANT
RESEARCH REPORT
POINTS:(2 -INTERNS WILL WRITE ONE RESEARCH REPORT )
1.TOPICS ONCE ALLOTED CANNOT BE CHANGED OR MODIFIED
2. EVERY TASK TOPICS SHOULD BE SENT AS PER THE GUIDELINES (Example –
Extensive topics should be sent after completion of Intensive articles)
3. NO LATE SUBMISSIONS ARE ALLOWED
4. KINDLY ALWAYS SEND CONSOLIDATED WORK FOR PLAGARISM CHECK.
5. USE DISCLAIMER AND THE BODY OF THE MAIL SHOULD HAVE PROPER
DESCRIPTION OF WORK.
6. NO SUBMISSION WILL BE CONSIDERED WITHOUT DECLARATION FORM
7. PLAGARSIM SHOULD BE LESS THAN 20%
8. ALL THE ALLOTMENT OF TOPICS TO BE SENT ON EMAIL ONLY WITH BELOW
MENTIONED BOLD
1)Human rights violations faced by women in unorganised sector
2)Satellite imagery and human rights
3)Study on Geographical Indications and Its Infringement
4)IP for social media influencers and content creators
5)Overview of Patent System for protection of Inventions in India
6)Pharmaceutical patents in India
7)Compulsory licensing under copyright law