The document provides a numerical scoring rubric to evaluate an assignment asking students to apply readings on identity development to their own experiences. The rubric contains 5 scoring criteria: 1) having a clear thesis, 2) effective organization leading to a clear conclusion, 3) adequate development of ideas with sufficient detail, 4) supporting claims with appropriate evidence and examples from theories and life, and 5) clarity through edited writing with accurate meaning. Scores range from 0 to 4 for each criterion depending on how well the response meets the criteria.
The document provides a numerical scoring rubric to evaluate an assignment asking students to apply readings on identity development to their own experiences. The rubric contains 5 scoring criteria: 1) having a clear thesis, 2) effective organization leading to a clear conclusion, 3) adequate development of ideas with sufficient detail, 4) supporting claims with appropriate evidence and examples from theories and life, and 5) clarity through edited writing with accurate meaning. Scores range from 0 to 4 for each criterion depending on how well the response meets the criteria.
The document provides a numerical scoring rubric to evaluate an assignment asking students to apply readings on identity development to their own experiences. The rubric contains 5 scoring criteria: 1) having a clear thesis, 2) effective organization leading to a clear conclusion, 3) adequate development of ideas with sufficient detail, 4) supporting claims with appropriate evidence and examples from theories and life, and 5) clarity through edited writing with accurate meaning. Scores range from 0 to 4 for each criterion depending on how well the response meets the criteria.
The document provides a numerical scoring rubric to evaluate an assignment asking students to apply readings on identity development to their own experiences. The rubric contains 5 scoring criteria: 1) having a clear thesis, 2) effective organization leading to a clear conclusion, 3) adequate development of ideas with sufficient detail, 4) supporting claims with appropriate evidence and examples from theories and life, and 5) clarity through edited writing with accurate meaning. Scores range from 0 to 4 for each criterion depending on how well the response meets the criteria.
Assignment:
Apply
the
readings
on
student
development
and
identity
development
to
your
own
development
of
social
identities.
What
development
model
resonated
with
your
own
experience?
Where
are
you
now?
How
did
you
get
there?
Use
specific
examples
from
your
life
and
texts
to
support
your
answer.
1. Has
a
clear
focus
and
central
THESIS
that
can
be
summarized
in
1-‐2
sentences
and
that
answers
an
implied
question
or
questions.
4
3
2
1
0
Focused
around
no
central
a
central
thesis
claim
2. Effectively
ORGANIZED,
leading
to
a
clear
conclusion.
4
3
2
1
0
clear,
logical
confusing,
disorganized
3. Adequate
DEVELOPMENT
of
ideas;
includes
sufficient
detail
to
be
persuasive.
4
3
2
1
0
ideas
fully
developed
and
explained
ideas
merely
asserted
or
repeated,
implications
and
counter-‐arguments
considered
mere
summary
or
generalizations
4. SUPPORT
claims
with
evidence,
including
reasoning,
examples,
analogies,
and
findings/ideas
of
authorities.
(Here
applies
clearly
understood
theories
to
own
life
with
specific
examples.)
Appropriately
and
accurately
quotes,
paraphrases,
and
summarizes
articles
and
attributes
ideas
to
their
authors.
4
3
2
1
0
appropriate
examples
examples
missing
or
inappropriate
quotations
well-‐chosen
and
accurate
inaccurate
representation
of
others’
ideas
5. Edited
for
CLARITY:
accurate
and
error-‐free
sentences
clearly
communicate
unambiguous
meaning.
4
3
2
1
0
correct,
contributes
to
communication
incorrect,
interferes
with
communication