Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Negotiable Instruments Act Short Notes by Amit Popli Sir
Negotiable Instruments Act Short Notes by Amit Popli Sir
66
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.1 MEANING OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT
1.Instrument The Term Instrument means any written document by which a right is created in
favour of some person.
2.Negotiable The word negotiable means transfer of right in an instrument by one person to
another.
3.Negotiable Negotiable instrument may be defined as documents by which rights vested in a
Instrument person can be transferred to another person by following the provisions contained
under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
4. Definition According to section 13(a) of this Act,
According to NI ▪ "Negotiable instrument" means,
Act ▪ a promissory note,
▪ bill of exchange or
▪ cheque
▪ payable either to
▪ order or
▪ to bearer."
67
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Special Case Mr. X executes a promissory note in the following form, 'I promise to pay a sum of
`10,000 after three months'. Decide whether the promissory note is a valid
promissory note.
Hint
2. Characteristics of Promissory Note
(a) In writing It is not necessary that the word 'promise' should be used.
(b) Unconditional The promise to pay must be definite and unconditional.
undertaking to pay Exception ➔ A promise to pay is not conditional of it depends upon an even
which is certain to happen but the time of its occurrence may be uncertain.
(c) Must be signed The promissory note must be signed by the maker.
by the maker
(d) Amount must The amount payable must be certain and not subject to any contingency
be certain
(e) Promise to pay Any promise to pay in kinds or to pay money and partly in kinds is not valid.
money only
3. Parties to a PN
(a) Maker The person making the PN
(b) Payee Person to whom or to whose order the payment is to be made
68
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 1
Quest-1 State whether the following statements are promissory notes or not?
(a) "I acknowledge myself to be indebted to L in `20,000 to be paid on demand, for value
received".
Answer:-…………………………………………………………………………………….
Answer:-…………………………………………………………………………………….
(c) "I promise to pay G `18,000 and all other sums which shall be due to him".
Answer:-…………………………………………………………………………………….
Answer:-…………………………………………………………………………………….
(e) "I promise to pay K `200 and deliver one quintal of paddy".
Answer:-…………………………………………………………………………………….
69
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.5 BILL OF EXCHANGE: [Section 5]
pay must be certain to happen but the time of its occurrence may be uncertain
unconditional
Exercise 2
Quest-1 Which of the following is a bill of exchange? Give reasons.
(a) "To Ram, Dear Ram, We hereby authorise you to pay on our account, to the order of Jai,
the sum of six thousand rupees."
(b) "`500." "Pay to my order the sum of five hundred rupees, for value received." It is neither
signed by any person as drawer nor addressed to any person as drawee. It is accepted by
Jai.
Ans
Case a)…………………………………………………………………………………………
Case b)…………………………………………………………………………………………
70
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
▪ Immediately on generation of electronic image or transmission, substituting the
further physical movement of cheque in writing.
4. Parties which are involved in Cheque:-
(a) Drawer A person who issues a cheque
(b) Drawee A Person to whom cheque Is issued i.e. Bank
(c) Payee The person named in the instruments to whom or to whose order the money is
directed to be paid by the instalment is called as payee.
71
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 3
Quest-1 State with reasons whether each of the following instruments is bearer or order:
(a) A bill is drawn payable to X or bearer.
(b) A bill is drawn payable to X who endorses it in blank in favour of Y.
(c) A bill is drawn payable to X.
(d) A bill is drawn payable to X or order.
Answer
Case a)…………………………………………………………………………………………
Case b)…………………………………………………………………………………………
Case c)…………………………………………………………………………………………
Case d)…………………………………………………………………………………………
72
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.8 SOME OTHER CRITICAL CONCEPTS
negotiable instrument,
▪ he thereby gives prima facie authority to the holder thereof to make or
complete, as the case may be, upon it a negotiable instrument
▪ for any amount specified therein not exceeding the amount covered by
the stamp.
▪ The person, so signing shall be liable upon such instrument, in the
capacity he signed the same to any holder in due course, for such amount
Provided that no person other than holder in course, shall recover from the person
delivering the instrument any thing in excess of the amount intended by him to be
paid there under."
2. Payment in Due Course [Section 10]
(a) Meaning Section 10 of NI Act:- Payment in due course means,
▪ Payment in accordance with the apparent tenor of the instrument
▪ in good faith and
▪ without negligence to any person in possession thereof
▪ under circumstances which do not afford a reasonable ground for
believing that he is not entitled to receive payment of the amount
mentioned therein
(b) Essential Characteristics
(i) Apparent tenor The payment of the instrument should be made according to the intention of the
of the instrument parties which appears on the face of the instrument.
(ii) Payment to the It should be made to the holder of the instrument or some other person, who is
holder authorized to get payment on his behalf
(iii) Payment in There should be no reasonable ground to believe that the person to whom the
good faith payment is made is not entitled to receive it.
[Allahabad Bank Ltd v Kul Bhushan]
In this case, the bank paid a cheque bearing forged signature of the drawer. It was
held that payment was not a payment is due course since paying banker is
required to verify the signatures of its customers
3. Forms Of Bill of Exchange [Section 11 & 12]
Inland Bill (Section A Bill of exchange is said to inland bill
11) ▪ if it is drawn and made payable in India or
▪ Drawn in India upon any person who is a resident of India even though
it is made payable in foreign country.
Foreign Bill "Foreign Instrument is one which is not a inland instrument"
(Section 12)
4. Instruments without Consideration [Section 43]
Meaning According to section 43 of this Act,
▪ "A negotiable instrument
▪ made, drawn, accepted, endorsed or transferred
▪ without consideration
▪ Creates no obligation of payment between the parties to the transaction.
73
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.8 SOME OTHER CRITICAL CONCEPTS
▪ But if any such party has transferred the instrument with consideration
to the holder for consideration,
▪ Such holder for consideration and
▪ every subsequent holder deriving title from him
▪ may recover the amount due on such instrument from
▪ Transferor for consideration or any prior party thereto".
Simple 1. In case any negotiable instrument is drawn without consideration, it creates
Interpretation no liability to pay between parties to transactions
2. If such instrument is obtained by Holder for consideration, he can recover
from Transferor for consideration and all prior parties
3. If HFC, further negotiate the same to any Holder whether with or without
consideration, then such Holder can also recover from his preceding
Transferor for consideration and all prior parties
Case No. 1 A draws a bill of exchange on B, payable to C or order. C endorsed it to D without
consideration. On maturity bill is dishonoured.Whether D can sue C for the
payment?
Ans No, since consideration is missing between both of them
Case No. 2 A draws a bill on B and B accepts it without consideration. A endorses that bill to C
without consideration. C endorses it to D for value consideration. TO whom D can
sue
Ans D being a Holder for consideration can sue all prior parties
5. Partial absence of money consideration [Section 44]
Meaning According to section 44 of this Act
▪ "when the consideration for which a person signed a promissory note, bill
of exchange or a cheque
▪ consisted of money
▪ and was originally absent in part or has subsequently failed in part,
▪ the sum, which a holder standing in immediate relation with such signor is
entitled from him is proportionately reduced".
Simple 1. If any NI was drawn where consideration was missing in part and only part
Interpretation amount consist of consideration.
2. Regarding immediate parties to such instrument, they can only recover the
amount for which consideration has been passed
3. However, if any such instrument later on transferred to HDC, such HDC is
entitled to recover from all prior parties
Case A draw a bill on B for `1000 payable to the order of A. B accept the bill but later
on dishonour it for non-payment. A sued B on the bill. B proves that it was
accepted for Value of `800 and as on accommodation for balance. How much A
can recover from B?
Ans Only `800 as both of them are in immediate relation, but if such instrument is
obtained by HDC, then such HDC can recover the entire amount of `1,000
Immediate Party As between "A" and "B", since transaction took place between both of them, thus
they are called immediate parties or parties in immediate relations.
74
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.8 SOME OTHER CRITICAL CONCEPTS
6. Partial Failure of Consideration not Consisting of Money [Section 45]
Meaning According to section 45 of this Act,
▪ "Where the consideration which has partly" failed
▪ consists of things other than money
▪ and the value of that failed consideration, can be ascertained without a
collateral enquiry,
▪ the parties, standing in immediate relation, can recover from each other
▪ only the proportionately reduced amount and not the whole amount of a
bill"
Further Provided that
▪ If the value of that failed consideration cannot be ascertained without
collateral enquiry
▪ the immediate parties to the bill are entitled to recover the full amount of
the bill from each other.
Agra and Masterman Bank v S. Leighton
In this case, A agrees to supply two bales of cotton to B. B accepts a bill for `1000
drawn by A, being the agreed price of two bales. Later on A delivers only one bale
of cotton to B. A sues B on the bill. B can take plea of partial failure of
consideration. It was held that A can recover only `500.
However the above rule applies only in case of immediate parties and the right
of holder in due course will not be affected.
7. Accommodation Bill
(a) Meaning An accommodation bill means a bill which is drawn, accepted without
consideration.
(b) [Explanation I ▪ The accommodated party
to Section 43] ▪ cannot,
▪ after he has paid the amount of the bill,
▪ recover the amount from accommodating party i.e. a person who became a
party to the bill for his accommodation
(c) Holder after The person who becomes the holder of such a bill in good faith and for
maturity Date consideration, after maturity, may recover the amount from any prior party
[Section 59]
8. Drawee in case of need [Section 7 AND 115]
Meaning ▪ Where in case of a bill
▪ Name of any person is given in addition to drawee
▪ To be resorted, in case of need
▪ Such a person is called as Drawee in case of need.
[Dore vs If a bill has been duly accepted but dishonoured when presented to drawee in first
Kanchiwalla] instance for payment, it cannot be validly presented for payment to the drawee in
case of need if it was not presented to him for acceptance.
9. Fictitious Payee [Section 42]
Meaning ▪ An acceptor of a bill of exchange
75
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.8 SOME OTHER CRITICAL CONCEPTS
▪ drawn in a fictitious name
▪ and payable to the drawer' s order is not,
▪ by reason that such name is fictitious,
▪ relieved from liability to any holder in due course claiming under an
endorsement by the same hand as the drawer' s signature,
▪ and purporting to be made by the drawer.
Exercise 4
Quest-1 State with reasons whether each of the following instruments is an Inland Instrument or a
Foreign Instrument:
(a) A bill drawn in Delhi upon a merchant in Agra and accepted payable in London.
(b) A bill drawn in Jaipur upon a merchant in London and accepted payable in Agra.
(c) A bill drawn in Jaipur upon a merchant in London and accepted payable in London.
(d) A bill drawn in London on a merchant in Agra and endorsed in Jaipur.
Case (a)…………………………………………………………………………………………
Case (b)…………………………………………………………………………………………
Case (c)…………………………………………………………………………………………
Case (d)…………………………………………………………………………………………
76
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.9 MATURITY OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT [Section 22, 23, 24 & 25]
month ▪ After sight or
[Section 23] ▪ After certain event,
it becomes payable three days after the corresponding date of month after the stated
number of months (section 23).
2. Situation, where If the month in which the period would terminate has no corresponding day, the
month does not period shall be terminating on the last day of such month.
have any
corresponding day
3. For PN/BE In calculating the date at which promissory note or bill made a certain number of
payable after a days:-
stated number of ▪ After date or
days [Section 24]
▪ After sight or
▪ After certain event,
is at maturity, the day of the date of presentation for acceptance or sight or of
protest for acceptance or on which the event happens shall be excluded.
4. Situation where When the day on which a promissory note or bill of exchange is at maturity is a
day of Maturity is a public holiday, the instrument is deemed to be due on preceding business day.
Public Holiday
[Section 25]
5. Where If an instrument is payable by installments, three days of grace are to be allowed on
Instrument is each installment.
payable in
installment
Exercise 5
Case No Date of Date of Payable Maturity Date
Drawing Acceptance
1 30th Jan 05 02nd Feb 05 2 months after date
2 31st Jan 05 02. Feb 05 1 month after date
3 29th Jan 05 03 Feb 05 30 days after date
4 12th July 05 14 July 05 1 month after date
5 28th Sept 05 01st Oct 05 2 months after sight
77
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
need to be (ii) He should have a right to receive or recover the amount due on the instrument
fulfilled before from the party liable to pay.
becoming a
Holder
Sarjoo Prasad ▪ S advanced a sum of `2500 under a promissory note.
Vs. Ram Pyari ▪ The note however was executed not in the name of S, but in the name of P who
Devi was 'Benamidar'.
▪ On maturity S sued to recover the amount from the debtor.
▪ It was held that he could not recover as he was not a holder having a right of
possession and payment.
78
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.12 SPECIAL PRIVILEGES OF HDC
5. Right in case of ▪ Where a negotiable instrument has been endorsed and delivered conditionally
conditional delivery or for a special purpose i.e. as collateral security
of an instrument ▪ and not with the intention of transferring property therein absolutely.
[Section 46]:
▪ Property in instrument does not pass to the endorsee and he is merely a bailee
having limited rights against that instrument.
▪ This however does not affect the right of holder in due course.
▪ If such an instrument is negotiated to him, the parties liable on the instrument
cannot escape liability.
4. Liability of party Any acceptor, maker or drawee, who has made payment in due course of the lost
who has made the instrument, which was 'payable to bearer' to the finder, will be Discharged from
payment in good the liability.
faith
5. In case lost In case the instrument is 'payable to bearer' and the finder of that instrument
instrument was negotiates it to holder in due course. Such holder in due course, will get good title
payable to Bearer and will become rightful owner.
6. In case lost In case the instrument is 'payable to order' the finder of that instrument forges the
Instrument was endorsement and negotiates it to holder in due course. But such holder in due
payable to Order course will not get title to the instrument.
79
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.14 RIGHT AND LIABILITIES OF PARTIES IN CASE OF NI WHICH IS OBTAINED
THROUGH UNAUTHORISED MEANS
In this case the golden rule that 'forgery confers no title in any case' will be
applied.
2. Instrument obtained by fraud
Effect ▪ In case, the maker or acceptor proves that an instrument was obtained from
him by fraud, the person defrauding is not entitled to recover the payment.
▪ In case such an instrument gets in to the hands of holder in due course, such
holder will acquire good title or a subsequent holder deriving title from such
holder will enjoy good title.
▪ In other words, if any instrument having defective title is obtained by HDC, it
become free from all defects
23.17 ASSIGNMENT
1. Meaning Assignment means
▪ Transfer of ownership of negotiable instrument
▪ through a written and registered document
▪ under the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
▪ Through making such document, the transferee becomes entitled to possess the
80
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
instrument in his own name and recover its payment on due date.
2. Right of The assignee of such instrument will get same title as the assignor has. In other words
Assignee he does not get the right of HDC.
81
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
good title to it and all prior parties shall be liable to him in spite of initial
conditional delivery.
Simple ▪ If "A" deliver a Cheque as security purpose to "B", this will be called conditional
interpretation of delivery and "B" shall be regarded as transferee.
Conditional ▪ However if "B" further negotiate the Cheque to any HDC, then such HDC can
Delivery recover the amount mentioned on cheque from all prior parties including "A"
▪ Thus "A" cannot plead in front of HDC that such cheque was delivered by him as
security purpose only
82
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
endorsement the endorsee or any subsequent holder in case of dishonor of the instrument, the
endorsement is known as 'sans recourse' endorsement.
Such an endorsement is made by adding the words 'sans recourse' or 'without recourse.'
7. Facultative When the endorser expressly gives up some of his rights under the negotiable
endorsement instrument, the endorsement is called a 'facultative' endorsement.
Example Pay to A or order, 'a notice of dishonor waived.'
S/d B.
▪ In case, such instrument is dishonored on the date of maturity A
or holder is not required to give notice of dishonor to B as to
make him liable.
▪ B will be liable as if notice of dishonor has been given to him.
83
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.25 MEANING OF DISCHARGE OF AN INSTRUMENT
1. Meaning An instrument is said to be discharged only when the party who is ultimately liable
therein is discharged from liability.
2. Modes of Discharge of an Instrument
1. Payment in When a party primarily liable on NI makes the payment in due course.
due Course
2. Cancellation If the holder of an instrument cancels acceptor's or endorser's name with intent to
discharge him, the instrument is discharged.
3. Release If the holder of an instrument renounces his right against all the parties to the
instrument, the instrument is discharged.
4. Party If the acceptor of a bill of exchange becomes its holder at or after maturity in his own
Primarily Liable right, the instrument is discharged.
becoming Holder
23.26 HUNDIES
Meaning ▪ Hundi is a negotiable instrument drawn in an oriental or vernacular language.
▪ The Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 is ordinarily not applicable to Hundies but
the parties to the Hundies may agree to be governed by the Negotiable Instrument
Act.
▪ A Hundi may be accepted orally as per local usage.
▪ A Hundi is assignable without any regular form of endorsement.
Types of Hundies
Shah Jog Hundi It is a hundi payable to Shah (i.e. a financier of repute) Shah
Nam Jog Hundi It is a hundi payable to the party named in the Hundi or his order. It is transferable
by endorsement and delivery.
Dhani Jog Hundi It is a hundi payable to the Dhani or owner a holder or bearer owner. It is
transferable by mere delivery.
Jokhmi Hundi It is a hundi drawn on or against goods shipped on the vessel mentioned in the
hundi and is payable only when the goods reach their destination safely. It is
combination of a bill of exchange and insurance policy.
Jawabee Hundi It is a hundi which is in the nature of a letter or recommendation to a banker for
payment of particular amount to a particular person.
Khoka Hundi which has already been discharged
84
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.27 MEANING OF DISCHARGE OF A PARTY
3. By Allowing If the holder of a BE allows the drawee more than 48 hour exclusive of public
drawee more than 48 holiday, all prior parties whose consent is not obtained are discharged from their
hours to Accept liability.
[Section 83]
4. By Qualified If a holder of a bill of exchange elects to take a qualified acceptance, all previous
Acceptance parties whose consent is not obtained to such acceptance are discharged from
liability.
5. By Material any material alteration of a negotiable instrument renders the same void as
Alteration against anyone who is a party thereto at the time of making such alteration and
does not consent thereto.
6. Negotiation Back If a bill of exchange which has been negotiated is, at or after maturity, held by
the acceptor in his own right, all right of action thereon are extinguished.
7. By Operation of under the Law of On the expiry of the period prescribed for
Law the Limitation Act the recovery of the amount due;
under the Law of On declaration of a party as an insolvent by an order of the
the Insolvency court.
85
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.29 CROSSING OF CHEQUE [Section 123 to 131A]
▪ the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed generally".
Effect Any Cheque having General Crossing shall be payable to any banker only and not
over the counter i.e. Cash by Paying Banker
2. Special According to section 124 of this Act,
Crossing ▪ "Where a cheque bears across its face
▪ an addition of the name of banker,
▪ the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed specially".
Effect Any cheque having special crossing shall be payable to collecting banker only whose
name is mentioned in special crossing
3. Restrictive Where a cheque crossed generally or specially also contain the words' A/c Payee
crossing or A/c only' it is known as restrictive crossing.
Payee Crossing
Effect Restrictive crossing provides a direction to the paying banker that proceeds of a
cheque shall be deposited only in the account of 'payee' whose name is mentioned in
the cheque.
This crossing to be valid must be either with general crossing or with special
crossing
4. Not negotiable Where the cheque drawn by the drawer is made payable to payee and only to him, by
crossing mentioning the words 'not negotiable' between the parallel lines drawn for the
purpose of crossing, such crossing is known as not negotiable crossing.
Effect Where Not Negotiable Crossing is there in some instrument, it would means that the
right of endorsee is equivalent to the right of transferor
This crossing to be valid must be either with general crossing or with special
crossing
86
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.32 WHEN BANKER MUST REFUSE THE PAYMENT
be solely responsible for that.
2. Death or The banker, on receiving information that the customer has died or has become
insanity of insane or insolvent, must refuse the payment of cheques presented afterward.
customer
3. Garnishee On receiving, Garnishee order or any other order of the court, the banker must refuse
order to honour cheques presented after such order.
4. Defective title Where the banker is suspicious about the title of the holder, and has sufficient ground
of holder to believe that the holder, presenting a cheque has no title or his title is defective, the
banker must refuse to honour such cheques.
5. Closing of When the customer has already given a notice to the banker for closing his account.
account After receiving such notice the banker must not make payment of any cheque drawn
in that account.
6. Lost cheque Where the customer has lost the cheque and has already given information about it to
the banker; the banker is no more under obligation for paying the cheques drawn by
the customer. In case, the banker makes payment, it can be recovered from the payee
who has got the payment of the lost cheque.
88
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Consequences of Dishonor by Non-acceptance
▪ Holder can sue all prior parties instantly
▪ No need for waiting till the maturity and prior parties can be sued immediately.
5. Consequences If notice is not given to any party to whom it is required to be given, within reasonable
of omission to time, such party is discharged from liability on the instrument.
give notice of
Dishonor
89
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
In case of Where the Specially crossed cheque has been presented for the payment and the banker
Cheque Crossed pays it at its counter, otherwise than to a specified banker, the holder is entitled to sue
Specifically the bank for the recovery of loss sustained to him.
90
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
following 2 Drawer was having sufficient balance in his a/c and cheque should have been
condition are paid, in case the same is being presented within a reasonable time.
satisfied
3 After issue of cheque but prior to presentment for payment, drawee bank fails,
which result into actual damages to the drawer.
ANALYSIS
91
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
If accused is not one of the persons who falls under category of ‘persons who are responsible to
company for conduct of business of company’ as enumerated under section 2(60) of CA 2013,
read with section 179 of CA 2013, then merely by stating that ‘he was in-charge of day-to-day
management of the company’ or ‘responsible to company for conduct of business of company’, he
cannot be made vicariously liable under section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The
settled position is that a Managing Director is, prima facie, in-charge of and responsible for the
company’s business and affairs and can be prosecuted for offences by the company within the
meaning of section 2(60) of CA 2013, read with section 179 of CA 2013 – National Small
Industries Corpn. Ltd. vs. Harmeet Singh Paintal (2010) 98 SC 407 (SC)
2 The cheque should have been issued by the drawer in favour of another person
for the discharge of legally enforceable debt or other liability, in whole or in
part.
ANALYSIS
3 The cheque should have been presented to the bank within a period of' 3
months from the date on which it is drawn
ANALYSIS
92
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
4 The payee or the holder in due course of the cheque should have made a
demand for the payment of money by providing a written notice to drawer
within 30 days of the receipt of intimation from bank regarding dishonor.
5 The drawer failed to make the payment to the payee or the holder in due course
within ……days of the receipt of the said notice.
6 The payee or the holder in due course should have lodged a written complaint of
the offence to a Court within one month of the date on which the cause of action
arose under the said provisions. [Section 142]
93
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
94
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
23.44 PAYMENT FOR HONOUR [Section 113 & 114]
The following The following conditions are essential for the payment of honour:
conditions are (1) The bill must have been noted or protested for non-payment.
essential for the
payment of (2) The person paying or his agent declares before Notary Public the party for
honour: whose honour he pays.
(3) Such declaration must have been recorded by the Notary Public.
(4) Payment must be made for the honour of any party liable on the bill or not
(Section 113).
Right of the Any person making payment for honour is entitled to all the rights, in respect of the
payer for honour bill, of the holder at the time of such payment. He may recover from the party for
whose honour he pays all sums so paid with interest thereon and all expenses
properly incurred in making such payment (Section 114).
95
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Vijay negotiate the instrument to Kamal and instrument was further negotiated from Kamal
to ➔ Ravi➔ Sunny.
Now Sunny brought the instrument for acceptance to Aman, however Aman show his
willingness to put conditional acceptance as follow
96
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 5
Situation No-1:- If sunny do not want to accept this acceptance, then he can sue
…………………………………………………………
Situation-2:-Incase Sunny decide to go along with this acceptance, then solve the
following cases
Case-1- He accept the same without obtaining any consent from any prior party
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
Raj➔Mahesh➔Sunny➔Vineet
Vineet brought the instrument for payment to Ajay, however Ajay Refused to pay the
same. Discuss the right of following Parties
1. Vineet = ……………………………………………………………………….
2. Sunny = ………………………………………………………………………
97
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 5
3. Mahesh = ……………………………………………………………………….
4. Raj = …………………………………………………………………………
R➔X➔Y➔Z
Problem-1- How many time Z shall approach A
Solution :-…………………………………………………………………
Problem-2-Incase A refused to Accept the bill, discuss the right of Z
Solution :-…………………………………………………………………
Case No-2
Dated-11st June
X➔A➔B➔C
Problem-1- How many time C shall approach Y
Solution:-…………………………………………………………………
Problem-2-Incase Y refused to pay, discuss the right of C
Solution:-…………………………………………………………………
Case No-3
Dated-18st June
98
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 5
X➔A➔B➔C
Problem-1- How many time C shall approach Y
Solution:-…………………………………………………………………
Problem-2-Incase Y refused to pay, discuss the right of C
Solution:-…………………………………………………………………
Dated-8st Aug
X Z➔Without Consideration
Z A➔Without Consideration
On due date Y refused to pay, discuss right of
1. A = ………………………………………………………….
2. Z = ………………………………………………………….
3. X = …………………………………………………………..
Case-2- X approached Y for assistance and Y agreed to accept BE for him
Dated-8st Aug
X Z➔Without Consideration
99
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 5
Z A➔Without Consideration
A B➔With Consideration
On due date Y refused to pay, discuss right of
1. B = ………………………………………………………….
2. A = ………………………………………………………….
3. Z = …………………………………………………………..
Case-3- X approached Y for assistance and Y agreed to accept BE for him
Dated-8st Aug
X Z➔Without Consideration
Z A➔Without Consideration
A B➔With Consideration
B C➔With Consideration
On due date Y refused to pay, discuss right of
1. C= ………………………………………………………….
2. B= ………………………………………………………….
3. A= …………………………………………………………..
4. Z= …………………………………………………………..
Case-4- X approached Y for assistance and Y agreed to accept BE for him
Dated-8st Aug
X Z➔Without Consideration
100
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 5
Z A➔Without Consideration
A B➔With Consideration
B C➔With Consideration
C D➔Without Consideration
On due date Y refused to pay, discuss rights of
1. D = ………………………………………………………….
2. C = ………………………………………………………….
3. B = …………………………………………………………..
4. A = …………………………………………………………..
5. Z = …………………………………………………………..
Dated-8st Aug
Signatures of Promisor
Y
101
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 5
Answer-X Can Recover…………………………………………………..
Problem-5-Suppose X transfer the instrument to Z, who obtain it in good Faith and
for consideration, discuss the right of Z if Actual liab was ` 6,000 as against ` 10,000
as filled on instrument and amount covered by stamp was ` 20,000
Answer-Z Can Recover…………………………………………………..
Problem-6-Suppose X transfer the instrument to Z, who obtain it in good Faith and
for consideration, discuss the right of Z if Actual liab was ` 6,000 as against ` 10,000
as filled on instrument and amount covered by stamp was ` 8,000
Answer-Z Can Recover…………………………………………………..
Question 6 Discuss as to whose favour court will take and to whom it will be directed to prove their
point(Quest on Para 4.3)
1. Case of Ravi Kumar v Narayanmurthy
Fact of Case:- A BOE was drawn payable to R and it was accepted by N. No
consideration was involved. R sued N for payment and contended that
consideration was involved
Answer: …………………………………………………………………………
2. Case of Martin v Jasmeen
Fact of Case:- A PN was drawn payable to J after 1 month(Actual date of drawn
was 17th Oct 2007), Date was kept as blank and J filled the date as 17th Sept and
presented the Instrument for payment on 20th Oct treating it as Maturity Date, M
Refused to pay and challenged the Date
Answer:…………………………………………………………………………
3. Case of Hari lal v Rastogi
Fact of Case:- A Cheque was drawn payable to J, it was endorsed to R. H obtained
the possession by applying coercion. Later on R refused to pay by contending that
the title of H was Defective. H Lodged a case against R.
Answer:-……………………………………………………………………………
Question 7 Following are some alteration imposed on Instruments as stated below. Analyze them
and Discuss, whether they can be classified into Material Alteration or not.
Case Prior After Alteration by Holder
No
1
Dated-17th June-12 Dated-17th April-12
Signatures Signatures
102
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 5
Y Y
2
Dated-17th June-12 Dated-17th June-12
Signatures Signatures
Y Y
3
Dated-17th June-12 Dated-17th June-12
Signatures Signatures
Y Y
4
Pay X or Bearer Pay X or Bearer
` 5,00,000 ` 5,00,000
Axis Bank Signatures Axis Bank Signatures
Karol Bagh Branch Y Karol Bagh Branch Y
5
Pay X or order Pay X or order
` 5,00,000 ` 5,00,000
Axis Bank Signatures Axis Bank Signatures
Karol Bagh Branch Y Karol Bagh Branch Y
Case Prior After Alteration by Holder
No
6
Dated-17th June-12 Dated-17th June-12
103
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Exercise 5
after 90 Days after 90 Days
Signatures Signatures
Y Y
7
Pay X Pay X
` 5,00,000 ` 5,00,000
Axis Bank Signatures Axis Bank Signatures
Karol Bagh Branch Y Karol Bagh Branch Y
8
Dated-17th June-12 Dated-17th June-12
Signatures Signatures
Y Y
104