Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
Kariton Klasrum
CASE STUDY
THE PHILIPPINES
Kariton Klasrum
CASE STUDY
Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France
and
© UNESCO 2015
This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA
3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this
publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository
(http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en).
The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not
imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status
of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers
or boundaries.
The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily
those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
TH/APL/018/14/150
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .viii
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
1.2 Study scope and method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
v
6. The case of a former Kariton learner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Caster’s Kariton Klasrum experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
At formal school . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
List of Figures
Figure 1: The anatomy of the Kariton Klasrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Figure 2: Comparative population growth rate, by decade (1990–2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Figure 3: Poverty incidence in the population in Cavite Province (2006–2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Figure 4: Approximate organizational structure (20–40 volunteers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
List of Tables
Table 1: Basic education performance indicators in Cavite City (school years 2010–11 and 2011–12) . . 20
Table 2: Number of kariton learners, by age group and sex (2013–14) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Table 3: Number of DTC volunteers by position/work (as of January 2014) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Table 3: Examples of partners and contributions to the Kariton Klasrum programme . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
vi
Acronyms
vii
Preface
There has been significant progress towards the six EFA goals, however, all available indicators
are pointing to a bitter reality that EFA will be an “unfinished business”. The 2013/4 EFA Global
Monitoring Report has concluded that with less than two years until the 2015 deadline, the
world is not on track. Amidst the many challenges, many countries have demonstrated how
achievements can be made with the commitment from government, expanded partnerships,
innovative thinking and efficient use of resources. There are lessons to be learned.
At the Global EFA Meeting (GEM) in Paris in November 2012, Ministers, heads of delegations, leading
officials of multilateral and bilateral organizations, and senior representatives of civil society and
private sector organizations, including those from Asia-Pacific, committed to the “Big Push”. The
GEM participants called upon governments and EFA partners to identify successful initiatives and
innovative practices and to adapt, replicate, or scale-up such initiatives to speed up EFA progress.
Subsequently, the 13th Regional Meeting of National EFA Coordinators: The Big Push, which was
organized in Bangkok, Thailand on 26-27 February 2013 as a follow up to the GEM, underscored
the need for increased knowledge on innovative and creative ways of addressing EFA challenges
so as to inform policy-making and programme development on EFA. To this end, the meeting
requested UNESCO Bangkok to document innovative approaches and effective practices from
countries that have succeeded in transforming EFA goals into concrete realities and to disseminate
this knowledge for the benefit of all countries.
The Asia-Pacific region is full of successful initiatives, with stories of good practices in almost every
country. Over the years, UNESCO has documented these practices to share them with a wider
audience. These five country case studies provide in-depth understanding of promising initiatives
that are critical in EFA acceleration in Asia-Pacific. While this research attempts to gather evidence
on successful initiatives that have helped countries to accelerate EFA progress, it should be noted
that these case studies are some examples selected from a vast pool of equally promising EFA
practices in this region.
viii
Acknowledgements
The Country Case Studies on Promising EFA Practices in Asia-Pacific have been published with the
support from the Japanese Funds-in-Trust (JFIT).
We would like to thank the following experts and their respective institutes for preparing the
five country case studies on promising EFA practices in Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia
and the Philippines respectively: Dr. Manzoor Ahmed, Mahmuda Akhter, Dr. Anisuzzaman, and
Mahfuzar Rahman Jewel of the Institute of Child and Human Development (ICHD), Bangladesh;
Sitha Chhinh, Sarom Mok, Chhang Roth and Youhan Hor of the Royal Phnom Penh University
(RUPP), Cambodia; Anuradha De and Meera Samson of Collaborative Research and Dissemination
(CORD), India; Dr. Ella Yulaelawati, MA, Ph.D, Dr. Faisal Madani, M.Sc. Ed, Aryo Radiyo Sawung, M.Ed,
Cecep Somantri, S.S, and Dr. Suryadi Nomi of the Indonesian National Commission for UNESCO,
Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC) of the Republic of Indonesia; and Elaissa Marina Mendoza
and the Research Studies Unit of the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Regional
Centre for Innovation and Technology (SEAMEO INNOTECH).
Thank you to the following colleagues who provided their support in liaising with the respective
governments and institutes in the preparation of these country case studies on promising EFA
practices: Anwar Alsaid, Mee Young Choi and Nurhajati Sugianto, UNESCO Office in Jakarta;
Santosh Khatri, UNESCO Office in Phnom Penh; Kiichi Oyasu and Shereen Akhter, UNESCO Office
in Dhaka; Alisher Umarov and Girish Joshi, UNESCO Office in New Delhi; and Shailendra Sigdel,
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) New Delhi Cluster Office.
Our appreciation also goes to reviewers of the case studies: Min Bista, Gwang-Chol Chang,
David Clarke, Ginger Gruters, Hyunjeong Lee, Sun Lei, Tanvir Muntasim, Malisa Santigul, Nurhajati
Sugianto, Bertrand Tchatchoua, Nyi Nyi Thaung and Marlene Cruz Zegarra.
ix
Executive Summary
This case study on promising practices in Education for All (EFA) in the Philippines was
commissioned by UNESCO Bangkok with support from the Japanese Funds-in-Trust (JFIT) as
one of five country case studies from the Asia-Pacific region. The Asia-Pacific region is full of
successful and innovative initiatives that have helped governments accelerate EFA progress at
the country level. Governments in the region and beyond can learn from these experiences.
It is in this context UNESCO Bangkok has embarked on the documentation of such practices.
A major part of what the Philippines committed to in Dakar in 2000 was reaching the marginalized
and the underserved. Achieving the EFA goals means that the needs and circumstances of
the poorest, the most vulnerable, and the most neglected of the children and youth must be
attended to and addressed. In the Philippines, many out-of-school children are street children;
a major concern that the Philippine EFA 2015 Plan hopes to address. A number of initiatives
have been implemented to tackle this issue, including that of the Kariton Klasrum (Pushcart
classroom), an alternative system of education that is offered to street children and out-of-
school youth.
The programme was developed and implemented by the Dynamic Teen Company (DTC), a
non-governmental organization based in Cavite City. As part of this initiative, the DTC uses the
kariton, a pushcart that is used mostly by the poor in urban areas to collect scrap and used
bottles, as their mode of bringing a mobile classroom to street children. The Kariton Klasrum
programme provides alternative education, healthcare and food to disadvantaged children
with the aim of encouraging the children to attend or return to school. The Kariton Klasrum is
the core element of the K4 Project, which stands for Kariton Klasrum, Klinik and Kantin (Pushcart
Classroom, Clinic and Canteen).
This case study involved a desk review, field observations, focus group discussions and key
informant interviews. The study examined the background and rationale of the Kariton Klasrum
programme, its content, the profile of learners and volunteers, factors contributing to its success,
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
the challenges faced, and the lessons learned through the implementation of the programme.
The study also looked at the impact on learners and volunteers and the programme’s replicability
against the overall EFA situation in the Philippines, the local EFA initiatives, and synergies of the
Kariton Klasrum programme with formal education and other EFA-related programmes.
1
The study findings reveal that the K4 brings the “classroom” to the communities and provides
the learning materials and environment for children to learn. The programme has also been
providing food and first aid services without putting any financial burden on the learners. Kariton
Klasrums have been responsive to the learners’ needs and realities. The study also uncovered issues
regarding the availability and sustainability of volunteers, the need for standardized curriculum
across all local sites, the need for classroom- and performance-based assessment tools, the lack
of effective monitoring and evaluation of the programme, and the critical role of partners and
stakeholders to the success and sustainability of the programme. The strengthening of these areas
is recommended by the study.
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
As Education for All (EFA) continues to be a rallying call among many developing countries, one
of the major realizations as the deadline of 2015 draws nearer is that challenges in making the
EFA goals a lived reality are still aplenty, and that the solutions to these remain beyond reach for
many. According to the 2012 EFA Global Monitoring Report, the world is not on track to achieve
all of the targets by 2015, despite the advancements that have been made in a number of areas.
The commitment that many countries have expressed on a rhetorical level is being hampered by
human, institutional and structural constraints that make the task even more formidable.
The Philippine experience reflects these realities, as it has registered an uneven performance in the
implementation of EFA. But even against this bleak global and national backdrop, the Philippines
continues to be relentless in its pursuit of achieving the EFA goals. A number of programmes,
projects and good practices have been conceptualized, implemented and strengthened towards
this end. One such initiative is the Kariton Klasrum (Pushcart Classroom), an alternative system
of education that is offered to street children and out-of-school youth. It was developed and
implemented by Dynamic Teen Company (DTC), a non-governmental organization based in Cavite
City, which is located south of Manila. The DTC uses the lowly kariton, a pushcart used mostly
by the poor in urban areas to collect scrap and used bottles, as their mode of bringing a mobile
classroom to street children. The Kariton Klasrum programme provides alternative education,
healthcare and food to disadvantaged children with the aim of encouraging the children to attend
or return to school.
In 2013 UNESCO Bangkok with support from the Japanese Funds-in-Trust (JFIT) commissioned the
SEAMEO INNOTECH to conduct a case study of a successful and innovative initiative that has been
critical in fast-tracking EFA in the Philippines. SEAMEO INNOTECH selected the Kariton Klasrum
programme, as it is regarded as highly promising.
The Research Studies Unit of SEAMEO INNOTECH undertook this case study research between
June 2013 and January 2014, using the following methods: a desk review, field observations, focus
group discussions and key informant interviews.
The desk review examined EFA reports and other monitoring documents, including those
describing EFA initiatives such as the Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programme, locally known as
the Pantawid Pamilya Pilipino Program (4Ps). The members of the research team then visited Cavite
City (in Region IV-A), Novaliches City (in Metro Manila) and Bacolod City (in Region VI) to conduct
field observations on the implementation of the Kariton Klasrum programme in these places. In
addition to photo and video documentation, the research team collected pertinent information
such as number and type of learners and volunteers, modes of programme and class delivery
and the outcomes of the programme. Furthermore, the team noted the factors contributing
to successes and the challenges encountered in the implementation of this programme. The
team also conducted focus group discussions and interviews with the implementers, volunteer
teachers, learners and parents. The outcome of this process was a comprehensive overview of
what the Kariton Klasrum programme is all about.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
4
2 Overall EFA situation in
Philippines
In 2013, with the goal of assessing the progress made by the Philippines in terms of the EFA
Goals, the Philippines National EFA Committee, with technical assistance from SEAMEO INNOTECH,
undertook a study that looked into the gains and gaps in the pursuit of the four EFA Goals and
the attendant six production tasks and three enabling tasks defined in the Philippine Education
for All 2015 National Action Plan. This section summarizes the major findings of that assessment.
The Philippine EFA 2015 Plan of Action, anchored on the Dakar Framework for Action on EFA,
serves as the overarching framework for basic education in the country. As indicated in this basic
education blueprint, every citizen should be provided with the basic competencies that will make
her or him functionally literate.
Achieving a significantly higher level of literacy beyond basic literacy is a key component of EFA
efforts in the Philippines. The Philippines aimed to attain at least 84.59 per cent functional literacy
by 2015. This target was easily surpassed a few years before the 2015 deadline, as revealed in the
results of the 2008 Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey, which found that 86.4
per cent of Filipino children aged 10 years and above were functionally literate. This represents a
2 percentage point increase from the 2003 survey.
Although the target was met, it is clear that universal functional literacy is still far from being realized,
with 13.6 per cent of children, approximately 9 million, still functionally illiterate. Furthermore, if
the broader definition of functional literacy used by the Bureau of Alternative Learning (BALS) of
the Department of Education were adopted instead of the National Statistics Office’s definition,
the 86.4 per cent figure may well be overstated.
5
According to data from the DepEd, the National Statistics Office and other organizations,
the number of Alternative Learning System (ALS) learners 1 rose between 2006 and
2002, along with the number of Accreditation and Equivalency (A&E) test takers2
and passers. Despite the numerous ALS programmes and the untiring efforts to implement
these, data show that improvements are quite insignificant relative to the absolute number of
functionally illiterate people. Only 5.7 per cent of out-of-school youth have been enrolled in DepEd
programmes, indicating that a 17.4 per cent gap must be closed by 2015 if the target is to be
reached. This is a formidable task given that the annual rate of increase of enrolments has been
pegged at only 1 per cent.
The Philippines risks of falling short of other targets as well. One such target is that 32.5 per cent
of literacy programme clients will complete the ALS programmes with the desired literacy level.
In 2011, however, only 4.2 per cent of the 9 million functionally illiterate Filipinos had completed
an ALS programme. Thus, there is a gap of 28.3 percentage gap to fill before 2015. Furthermore, of
those who completed ALS programmes, only 0.8 per cent successfully completed the A&E tests,
a huge 31.7 percentage points from the target.
It is important to note that these figures represent only the learners that have been reached and
documented by DepEd, and do not include the out-of-school learners being served by those
outside DepEd such as local government units (LGUs), non-governmental organizations, academe
and private organizations. Since there is still no operational information management service for
data relating to out-of-school children and youth and no official consolidated data on the number
of learners served, a profile in terms of who and where they are, their specific needs and the level
of their literacy skill improvement cannot be accurately measured.
1 The ALS is a parallel learning system that provides a practical alternative to existing formal instruction and
encompasses both non-formal and informal sources of knowledge and skills. The target learners of ALS consist of
marginalized out-of-school children, out-of-school youth and adults who lack the basic literacy skills, out-of-school
youth and adults who are literate but unable to finish basic education, and out-of-school youth and adults with
special needs. Most of these target learners live below the poverty line and come from depressed, disadvantaged
underserved communities.
2 The A&E programme is a non-formal education certification programme for out-of-school children, youth and adults
that recognizes prior learning. It offers elementary and secondary education comparable to that of formal basic
education. The A&E test takers are those who wish to receive formal recognition of having an education equivalent
to elementary or high school graduates.
6
In recognition of the importance of early childhood education, enrolment in pre-school has
increased in recent years, rising to 75.7 per cent in school year 2010–11 from 68 per cent in the
previous year. There remains, however, a 24.3 percentage gap to be filled by 2015. Yet, if the
average annual increase of 13.6 percentage points is met, then the target may be reached in
2015. It should be noted, however, that the large increase in pre-school enrolments in school year
2009–10 may have been due to the exclusion of 4-year-olds from the population sample.
An alternative modality that has helped to expand pre-school education, particularly for marginalized
children, is the directive for day-care centres to become expanded pre-schools, which should use the
pre-school curriculum and teach pre-school competencies. Other alternative modalities include the
Preschool Service Contracting Scheme, covering accredited pre-school providers outside the public
system; and the Enhanced Eight-Week Kindergarten Summer Program, which is intended to widen
the coverage of pre-school education and to help children get ready for grade 1 academic work.
In spite of these efforts to expand pre-school programmes, a 2010 ECCD study that analyzed
School Readiness Assessment results found that only 40 per cent of the grade 1 entrants were
ready for school, with the remaining 60 per cent judged as needing to undergo the Eight-Week
Kindergarten Summer Program. Of the latter, close to a fifth of the children who completed the
programme were still not equipped to enter first grade. Improvements have been seen since then,
however, with the percentage of grade 1 entrants who have ECE experience increasing from 64.9
per cent in school year 2010–11 to 83.4 per cent in school year 2012–13.
This second EFA objective, while seeking universal pre-school education, seeks to also ensure all
children aged 6 and above are enrolled in school. Figures show that the net intake rate (NIR) has
increased in recent years, rising from 44 per cent in school year 2006–07 to 71 per cent in 2012–13.
While improvement has been seen, around one third of all six-year-olds are still not enrolled in
grade 1. Also, there is still a 24 per cent gap to be covered if the 95 per cent EFA target is to be
met. Net enrolment rates at the secondary level are not as high, with only 64.74 per cent enrolled
in secondary school in school year 2010–11. Thus, universal access may not be feasible by 2015.
The gender gap that traditionally favours males over females, palpable in other countries, is not
evident in the Philippines. In fact, the reverse is the case as females outnumber males in schools,
across all levels. In school year 2010–11, the gender gap, favouring females, in the net enrolment
rate widened as the level rose. There is a 2 per cent gender gap in kindergarten, 3 per cent at the
elementary level and 10 per cent gap at the secondary level.
The institutionalization of the Alternative Delivery Modes (ADMs), which the Department of
Education now calls the Flexible Learning Options, such as IMPACT (elementary level) and the
Open High School Program, which seek to address the learning needs of marginalized students
and those learners at risk of dropping out, is one major strategy that has been implemented to
reduce low participation, as well as to increase retention and completion rates among learners. A
number of other programmes have been put in place to ensure that more children are reached.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
These include:
•• The Reaching All Children project, which aims to help 5.6 million out-of-school youth return
to public schools nationwide and to reduce the 6 per cent and 7.5 per cent elementary and
secondary drop-out rates, involves a combination of strategies using innovative “catch and
hold” interventions, and relies on the active involvement of local government units and other
stakeholders to find, reach, keep and assist these children complete school.
•• In collaboration with local and barangay (village) officials, the DepEd implemented the “Early
Registration Day,” in order to reach more out-of-school children and youth, especially those from
7
disadvantaged groups like indigenous peoples and street children. This initiative, which aimed
to assist in the country’s efforts to achieve universal participation and completion of the basic
education cycle, necessitated a massive advocacy campaign that aimed to encourage parents
to register their children for school early, and to encourage the coordination of registration data
that would allow DepEd and the schools to prepare the resource needs and to provide education
interventions that could prevent pupils from dropping out.
•• The DepEd’s “No Collection Policy” prohibits the collection of certain school fees and prescribes
a schedule for the collection of some essential ones. By reducing the financial costs of attending
school, parents are more likely to send their children to school, which in turn increases student
enrolment and decreases their likelihood of dropping out.
•• The CCT programme, also popularly known as the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino programme (4Ps),
is a programme initiated by the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) that
grants the poorest households monthly allowances of 500 Philippine Pesos (PHP) for healthcare
and nutrition expenses, as well as allowances of PHP300 per child for educational expenses,
provided that certain conditions are met. One of the conditions is that children aged between
3 and 5 should attend pre-school classes at least 85 per cent of the time. Another requirement
is that children aged 6 to 14 should enrol in elementary or secondary schools and attend at
least 85 per cent of their classes. A study conducted on the CCT programme in the Philippines
revealed that it has had a strong and significant impact in terms of improving school enrolments,
particularly among the younger cohort of 9 to 12-year-old children (Chaudhury and Okamura,
2012). Results of FGDs among EFA cluster areas indicated a decline in school drop-out rates and
an improvement in the National Achievement Test (NAT) results in the areas where the CCT or 4Ps
had been implemented.
In an analysis of internal school efficiency, it was found that around 6 per cent of elementary
students drop-out of school. Between school years 2006–07 and 2011–12, there was minimal
reduction in the overall elementary drop-out rate. Most of the drop-outs tended to come from
the lower grade levels, with a high 13.04 per cent of pupils dropping out of grade 1 in school year
2011–12. Males are more likely to leave school compared to females. Repetition rates, on the other
hand, are also highest in the first grade. Overall, around 2.1 per cent of children repeat grades.
There was only a slight decline in the repetition rates between school years 2006–07 and 2011–12.
Several programmes have been implemented to reduce the number of school leavers and
repeaters. These include the strengthened School Health and Nutrition Program, which is aimed
to enhance students’ motivation, improve outcomes, reduce absenteeism and ensure completion.
Another programme is the Every Child a Reader Program, which determines the reading ability
of pupils and offers a reading intervention programme that helps equip children with reading
and writing skills. Furthermore, the Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE)
programme, which promotes the use of students’ native languages in instruction, has been shown
to boost their potential to learn and succeed in their academic lives, and the institutionalization
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
8
Goal 3: Universal completion of the full basic
education cycle with satisfactory annual
achievement levels
The Philippine EFA 2015 National Plan of Action aimed for all children aged 6–11 years old to
complete primary education, and for those aged 12–15 to complete secondary education, with
satisfactory achievement levels. Except for the elementary completion rate, all indicators related
to this objective saw an improvement, albeit gradually, over the past five years.
During the period 2006 to 2011, the elementary completion rate had an annual average increase
of only 0.1 per cent. The rate reached 72.1 per cent in school year 2010–11, which is 9 percentage
points off the EFA target of 81. The secondary completion rate, on the other hand, was much
better, at 75.1 per cent in school year 2010–11, and is more in line with the EFA target of 75.3
per cent. More females than males completed both levels of schooling in school year 2010–11,
with a 9-point and a 10-point difference at the elementary and secondary levels, respectively, in
favour of females.
The major gains that were achieved in this area could be attributed to the implementation of
various programmes and practices that specifically targeted disadvantaged learners who have
difficulties completing basic education. The programmes identified as effective were those
that involve close collaboration with private groups and NGOs, such as the Education Service
Contracting scheme whereby DepEd engages the services of a private institution or group to
deliver services to students who could not be accommodated in public schools due to congestion.
This third EFA objective also aims for students to reach a minimum level of competence in order
to be academically prepared for the subsequent level of basic education. One of the measures of
quality of education, the mean percentage scores (MPS) in the NAT, reveals that the elementary
achievement level increased between the years 2006 and 2011. The total elementary NAT MPS in
2011 was at 68.88 per cent, which is 6.12 percentage points below the EFA target of 75 per cent. The
secondary NAT MPS registered a low 51.41 per cent and has a larger gap of 23.59 percentage points
from the EFA target. Science consistently registered the lowest MPS in both primary and secondary
levels. The average annual increase of 2.1 percentage points in the elementary level and 0.3 per cent
in the secondary level indicates that more improvements have to be made to achieve satisfactory
education quality.
Private schools, despite having better facilities and learning materials, exhibit lower educational
quality compared to public schools according to NAT MPS figures, with the former achieving lower
scores. Private schools scored 16 percentage points lower in the primary level NAT and 4 points lower
in the secondary level NAT relative to public schools. There was a marginal difference between males
and females, with females scoring 4 percentage points higher than males in school year 2010–11.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
Achieving high quality education requires that DepEd implement measures to improve teaching.
One such initiative was the National Competency-Based Teaching Standards, developed and
adopted as the integrated framework for all teaching and teacher-development programmes
in the formal education sector. The implementation of the K to 12 Basic Education programme
was also a major government response to the call for enhancement in the quality of education
in the country. This programme entails not just lengthening the basic education cycle by adding
kindergarten and two more years in secondary school, but also enhancing the curriculum to
align with national and international education goals. The curriculum enhancements in the K to
9
12 programme are intended to address the needs and realities of the twenty-first century and are
designed to address the demands of the knowledge-based economy for local, national and global
development. A variety of other educational programmes have also been developed to improve
performance in specific subjects and courses, including science, mathematics and technical and
vocational education.
Overall, the prognosis seems to be good at the elementary level and it is likely that the primary-level
EFA quality targets will be reached. This does not seem to be the case, however, for the secondary level.
The Literacy Coordinating Council, which was created before the current EFA goals were set, may
be considered another initiative that has contributed to the improvements and progress towards
achieving the goals. This council is an inter-agency coordinating and advisory body tasked with
synchronizing and strengthening policies and efforts toward universalizing literacy. Many local
government units have organized city, municipal and barangay-level councils to advance literacy
at the local level.
Another achievement in recent years was the significant increase in the national education budget
as a share in the gross domestic product. The budget increased significantly from 2.8 per cent of
the gross domestic product in 2009 to 3.9 per cent in 2011. This, however, is still 2.1 percentage
points away from the 6 per cent share as prescribed in the Dakar Forum. But while basic education
remains a top provision in the national budget, the allocation remains insufficient to meet the
resource needs of the growing school-age population.
It is important to note that the education sector gets funding not only from the national government
allocation but also from the private sector, local governments and international donors. One of the
government’s efforts to strengthen public-private partnerships, the Adopt-a-School programme3,
is an example of a programme that has benefited from external funding. Likewise, the Special
Education Fund (SEF) generated by the local school board from 1 per cent of real estate tax proceeds
augments the education budget. The SEF is set aside for the operation and maintenance of public
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
schools; construction and repair of school buildings, facilities and equipment; educational research;
purchase of books and periodicals for school use; and development of children’s sports talents (see
3 Initiated by the DepEd in 2000 with the passage of R.A. 8525, this programme allows the private sector, including
business organizations, NGOs, foundations, individuals and other private entities in the Philippines and outside,
to assist public schools in the country in addressing perennial problems such as classroom, desk and textbook
shortages, as well as to provide mechanisms that will allow the private sector to assist in the upgrading and
modernization of Philippine public schools. Private sector donations can be classified under technology support,
learning support, health and nutrition, literacy and physical infrastructure. In return, the private entities can avail of
tax incentives, enhance their corporate image and promote goodwill in the community.
10
Republic Act No. 5447, Section 1). The SEF contributions from LGUs saw an 8.8 percentage increase
in 2008 and an even higher increase, 11.2 per cent, in 2010 (COA, 2010). Overseas Development
Assistance, mostly in the form of loans, has been a major source of education funding as well, with
the World Bank and the Japan Bank for International Cooperation providing more than half (52
per cent) of the total loans for the period 2000–2010 while the Australian Agency for International
Development (AusAid) provided almost half (46 per cent) of the total grants (USAID, 2011).
Conclusion
Overall, the Philippines is on track to achieving, or even surpassing, some of its key targets,
assuming that the current rate of improvement is sustained in those indicators. To a large extent,
significant improvements registered in many of the key indicators could be attributed to the
intensified efforts to implement the EFA catch-up plan. This plan, as formulated and executed by
the DepEd, has the following broad major strategies (cited in SEAMEO INNOTECH, 2014):
•• Engaging broad stakeholder support, including from civil society, the private sector, LGUs, other
government agencies and the donor community through programmes such as Brigada Eskwela
and the Adopt-a-School programme.
•• Finding
the children, bringing them to schools and keeping them there through specific
community-based advocacy initiatives such as parent education and linking with 4Ps.
Also critical to the DepEd approach is the focus on the 40 bottom divisions (provinces or cities),
defined as those at the bottom in terms of performance in participation rates, dropout rates,
completion rates, and national achievement rates.
Key to the gains that have been achieved so far were the substantial increase in the national
budget allocation for education; the basic education development plans and programmes being
anchored on the EFA agenda as seen in the 4Ps programme and the Philippine Development Plan;
the complementary efforts by civil society; and the positive political will of the current leadership.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
Notwithstanding all these, a number of indicators are still at risk of not being met by 2015. Drop-
out rates in grades 1–3, as well as repetition rates, continue to be high, while the secondary-level
net enrolment rate and achievement in the NAT hover in the low range. These bottlenecks indicate
that there is an urgent need to re-strategize and sharpen focus on the existing disparities and
inequalities.
11
3
Out-of-school and street
children in the Philippines
3.1 Background
The considerable number of out-of-school children in the Philippines is a major concern that
the Philippine EFA 2015 Plan hopes to address. DepEd data show that in 2008 only 88 per cent
of primary-aged children (6–11 years old) were attending primary school, while an even lower
per cent (60 per cent) of secondary-aged children (12–15 years old) were in secondary school. The
National Statistics Office revealed in their 2008 Annual Poverty Indicator Survey that around 2.9
million children aged 5–15 years old were out of school4. The 2009 EFA Global Monitoring Report
took note of such and referred to the Philippines as one of the countries with a sizable number
of out-of-school children.
Many out-of-school children are “street children”. A street child, as one oft-cited definition states,
is “any girl or boy… for whom the street (in the widest sense of the word, including unoccupied
dwellings, wasteland, etc) has become his or her habitual abode and/or source of livelihood; and
who is inadequately protected, supervised or directed by responsible adults” (United Nations as
cited in UP CIDS PST & CSC, 2003). UNICEF defines street children as “minors whose home ties are
so weakened that they essentially live on the streets, relying on their efforts to meet virtually all
their basic needs” (cited in Lamberte, 2002).
There are various “types” of street children, with one of the most popular categorizations describing
street children as either “on” or “of” the streets. The children categorized as being “on the street”
(street-working) are those who spend most of their time on the street to earn a living or beg, but
generally return home, either regularly or irregularly. The street children who are “of the streets”
(street-living) are those who have no homes to return to – they were possibly abandoned by family
or may not have any family left alive. They struggle on their own while living with other homeless
children or adults on the street. Another category is “Street-family” children, who live on the streets
with their respective families (WHO, 1995). As definitions continue to evolve, other categories have
emerged, such as “street-connected children”, which includes children for whom the street is a
reference point and one that plays a significant role in their lives, and “children in street situations”,
which recognizes that children take on numerous activities on the street, and that the “problem”
is not about the child but the situation she or he is in. (OHCHR, 2012).
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
4 Include those who are not in school, primary-aged children and older who either in pre-primary or non-formal education
12
Defining and categorizing street children is increasingly recognized as a complicated endeavour,
however. Research has shown that there is considerable overlap among the categories and that
these do not accurately reflect the children’s experiences (OHCR, 2012). Other social scientists
argue that the label “street children” is a socially constructed category that does not see the
children as being part of a clearly defined homogenous population (Thomas de Benitez, 2011). Still
others argue that the term is inappropriate because it weakens the focus on the “interconnected
dimensions of child vulnerability” (Soale, 2004). Street children in the Philippines have themselves
also raised objections as to how the term “street children” is traditionally defined because of the
negative connotations attached to it (e.g. deviant, petty thieves) (UP CIDS PST and CSC, 2003).
Since the 1990s, the big number of street children in the Philippines and the attendance issues have
been a grave concern (KidsRight & Leiden University, 2012). It is difficult to establish the exact number
of street children in the Philippines because of the difficulties in definition, the highly mobile and
vacillating nature of this group, and because not all of these children are visible. There have been
attempts to quantify this group, but such estimates need to be treated with caution. The most oft-
cited estimate gives the number of street children as 246,011 (Lamberte, 2002). This comprises 3
per cent of the population aged 0–17 years old, and 5 per cent of the country’s urban poor
children, which numbers over 4 million. Of the total number of street children located in 22 major
cities covered in the study, 22,556 (20 per cent) are considered as “highly visible on the streets”,
or those who require the most urgent or priority help. One study estimated that in Metro Manila
alone there are an estimated 11,346 “highly visible” street children. Other studies have estimated
that the City of Manila has 3,266 street children, while Caloocan City has 1,530, Pasay City has 1,420;
and Quezon City has 2,867.
In another study, Cebu City (in the Visayas region) was reported to have 5,000 street children
(Pomm, 2005). A recent study reported that some organizations now estimate the number of
street children in some parts of the country to be much higher, and that about 150,000 children
live on the streets of Manila without families (Fondation Sanofi Espoir, 2012). According to the
studies, a majority of the street children are boys. Girls tend to be fewer, probably because they
are generally expected to help younger siblings, are usually employed as household help, or are
lured into prostitution (Silva, 2003). Despite being relatively fewer, the girls, on account of their
gender and situation in the streets, tend to be more vulnerable to physical and sexual abuse, to
teenage pregnancies and to sexually transmitted diseases (Childhope Asia Philippines as cited in
Bahay Tuluyan, 2009).
factors that have been identified are poverty (low family income), homelessness, adverse family
relationships (neglect or physical or sexual abuse), school failure, loss of parents due to armed
conflicts and natural disasters, and peer influence (Soale, 2004). In Metro Manila and other urban
centres where income inequality, rapid population growth, urbanization and migration have
worsened over the years, poor children face greater risk of being thrown into a life where they
need to eke out a living or fend for themselves on the streets.
13
In a more detailed categorization of causes, Silva (2003) enumerated the causes or factors of the
street children phenomenon (quoted verbatim below):
14
•• Income-generating activities such as vending, scavenging and washing and/or watching cars,
buses, market stalls.
•• Resting and interacting with peers, such as playing with other kids, telling stories/ conversing with
other children, eating and drinking with other children and sleeping.
Poor nutrition and an unhygienic lifestyle: Street children tend to be malnourished and
deprived of good nutrition. They are at high risk of contracting serious infectious diseases, primarily
as a result of sleeping and living in unsanitary situations. The most common health problems
reported are coughs, fevers, dyspnoea, diarrhoea, and blood in the faeces.
Dangerous working conditions: The children who work in the streets are exposed to conditions
hazardous to their health and lives. For instance, Filipino children who work as scavengers in the
dumps of Metro Manila have a high probability of suffering from respiratory infections or being
buried under unstable piles of garbage.
Violence and abuse: Living and working in the streets makes the children particularly vulnerable
to violence and abuse, whether physical or sexual. Psychosocial support for these children is
imperative given the adverse physical and psychological impact that they are likely to experience
as a result of this violence and abuse.
“Rescue operations”: While inadequate housing and shelter is an issue faced by street children
worldwide, street children in the Philippines face a particular issue related to life on the streets
called “rescue operations” or the “act of a government agency physically removing a child from the
streets for the stated purpose of removing the child from danger” (Bahay Tuluyan, 2009). A study
has found that this practice is indiscriminate, involuntary, harmful and ineffective.
Legislative initiatives on child protection seeking to protect the children from abuse, exploitation,
discrimination, and child labour; are some of the major efforts that have been undertaken towards
upholding the rights and welfare of Filipino street children.
•• Republic Act 7610; an Act Providing for Stronger Deterrence and Special Protection of Children
Against Child Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination.
15
•• Republic Act 7658; an Act Prohibiting the Employment of Children Below 15 Years of Age in Public
and Private Undertakings.
•• Republic Act 9344; Act Establishing a Comprehensive Juvenile Justice and Welfare System.
•• Republic Act 9208; Act to Institute Policies to Eliminate Trafficking in Persons Especially Women
and Children.
There is, however, no specific law that addresses the special conditions and needs of street
children. In 2013, a bill was filed in the Senate (Senate Bill 685) that aims to assist in providing street
children the means “to uplift their conditions and take them out of the street through programs
that will equip them with livelihood, technical and social skills.” This bill likewise mandates the
establishment of crisis centres for street children all over the country. As of March 2014, the bill
was still pending at the Senate committee level.
In the meantime, national and local government agencies and non-governmental organizations
continue to work hand in hand to address the situation of the growing number of Filipino street
children. An example of the cooperative effort is the Council for the Welfare of Children, under the
Office of the President, which is the focal inter-agency institution for children of the government
of the Philippines and is mandated to coordinate issues pertaining to the rights of the child. It
chairs the National Network for Street Children, which is charged with coordinating the initiatives
of government and non-governmental agencies intended for street children. A key government
agency providing services for street children is the DSWD. International organizations, such as Save
the Children, World Vision and UNICEF, and local NGOs such as Childhope Asia Philippines, Bahay
Tuluyan and the Virlanie Foundation have also been active in improving the plight of the children.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
16
4 The Klasrum programme
Bringing education to out-of-school and marginalized children is a major goal under EFA. To address
this requires countries to move beyond formal education and explore non-formal initiatives that
could pave the way for children to return to mainstream education later on. One EFA initiative in
the Philippines that has attracted both national and international attention is the Kariton Klasrum
(Pushcart Classroom). The Kariton Klasrum is the core element of the K4 Project, which stands for
Kariton Klasrum, Klinik and Kantin (Pushcart Classroom, Clinic and Canteen). It began in Cavite
City as a six-month-long, weekly educational intervention conducted among street children and
out-of-school youth, but has now spread to underprivileged children in other areas of the country.
The lowly kariton that serves as the programme’s main symbol and tool is a pushcart made of
scrap wood, metal and rubber mostly used by bottle, newspaper and scrap collectors to eke out
a living while serving also as a mode of transportation, a home, a bed, an occupational tool and as
a playground for others. With its improvised engineering and construction, the kariton has come
to symbolize not just poverty but also Filipino ingenuity (de Gracia, 2012). For the Dynamic Teen
Company, the founders of the K4 project, the kariton serves not only as a means to house and
transport all the learning materials, food and first-aid supplies needed by the children, but, for the
proponents and learners, it also symbolizes both the destitution and the hope that constantly
consume these children’s lives.
4.1 Background
The K4 Project was born from the hearts and minds of a group of high school students led by
Efren Peñaflorida. Mr Peñaflorida experienced bullying at secondary school, which almost made
him quit school. Instead, Mr Peñaflorida, along with his classmates, formed, in 1997, a youth group
in high school which they named the Dynamic Teen Company. Initially composed of 20 teenage
members, the group made it its mission to provide youth with a venue away from street gangs
and unproductive behaviour. The DTC sought, and seeks today, to lead children and youth in “the
right direction, (and to) train and develop them to become good, productive, and responsible
citizens” through activities such as youth awareness projects, talent enhancement programmes,
self-development activities, and community service (DTC, 2012).
The DTC is one of the groups under the humanitarian arm of its mother organization –
the non-profit, Christian youth organization, Club 8586, Inc. Other groups that have emerged
from this humanitarian arm are Championing
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
17
undertaken to finance their activities. Meanwhile, the DTC’s outreach activities in the depressed
areas in Cavite City continued regularly. Their forays to the dump, in particular, opened their eyes
significantly to the realities of a growing sector of the youth who were not in school.
It was in 2007 that the Kariton Klasrum was launched. A fire that razed an old headquarters of
Club 8586 left them with a kariton that was used for transporting some materials to the new
headquarters. It was decided that a kariton would be a better alternative to using a pedicab5, which
had initially been used for transporting materials, because the latter frequently had flat tires, which
delayed the outreach activities. The lowly kariton got a makeover and it slowly evolved into its
present design complete with shelves and drawers (see Figure 1). Today, the DTC possesses four
pushcarts and these have made their way to various parts of the city, particularly to those that
have a high number of street children and out-of-school youth.
85cm
111cm Shelves for books, toys and other
learning materials and supplies.
103cm
For foldable tables, chairs, and Drawers as food bins (to shade the
big water jugs. 58cm
34cm food from the sun).
160cm
5 Similar to a motorized tricycle but is designed to be powered by a person in transporting people or goods
18
4.2 Rationale of the programme
The Kariton Klasrum came about as a result of both personal and social factors. Efren Peñaflorida’s
personal experience helped drive the development of the Kariton Klasrum programme. The
experience of being bullied in school led Mr Peñaflorida and the other founders of the programme
to reflect on the issues that force children to drop out and leave the formal school system, and to
think about the lack of alternatives to the formal system. The DTC founders decided that there was
a clear need for alternatives, tailored to local contexts, which would provide out-of-school children
and youth with positive educational activities.
Cavite City
Cavite City is one of the six (cities of the province of Cavite, which belongs to Region IV-A6
(the Calabarzon7 region). It lies southwest of Manila. As of 2010, Cavite Province had a population
of 3,090,691 and is considered the most populous province in the country (National Statistics
Office, 2012). The population of Cavite comprises close to a quarter of Region IV-A’s population.
It has the fastest population growth rate in the country, with the growth rate per decade more
than doubling the average registered at the national level during the same periods (see Figure 2).
7 5.99
6 5.05
5 4.12
4 Cavite
3 2.34 2.12
1.9 Philippines
2
1
0
1990-2000 2000-2010 1990-2010
The high growth rate was primarily brought about by the industrialization of Cavite, which drove
significant in-migration, with many companies and workers choosing to establish themselves in
the province (CPPDO, 2012).
This demographic trend is one of the main factors contributing to the increasing number of street
children, drop-outs and out-of-school youth in the city in recent decades. The increasing poverty
incidence among the population also is likely to be another key factor (See Figure 3). Poverty
continues to force families to discontinue or de-prioritize their children’s education. Some children
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
are pushed to make a living on the streets at an early age while other children leave their families
or have no option but to live in the streets, becoming exposed to gangs, drugs and adverse risks.
6 Regions are administrative divisions of the country that serve to organize provinces for administrative efficiency.
With the exception of the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), the regions are not assigned a separate
local government.
7 Calabarzon Region is Region IV-A and is composed of five provinces, namely, Cavite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal and
Quezon.
19
Figure 3: Poverty incidence in the population in Cavite Province (2006–2009)
6.8 6.7
6.7
6.6
6.5 6.4
6.4
6.3 6.2
6.2
6.1
6
5.9
2003 2006 2009
The basic education performance indicators in the city of Cavite also show a significant increase in
the drop-out rate for elementary-aged children between 2010 and 2012, indicating an increasing
number of out-of-school children during this period. Furthermore, the participation rates show
that a high percentage of school-age children, particularly in the secondary level, are not attending
school. The low cohort survival, which decreased among secondary-school children, and the
completion rates, though improving, are also a cause for concern (see Table 1).
Table 1: Basic education performance indicators in Cavite City (school years 2010–11 and
2011–12)
Education Indicators
Elementary 2010–11 2011–12
Participation Rate 86.79% 91.94%
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
20
A probable contributing factor to these poor education indicators is the fast population growth
seen in recent decades. As noted by the former K4 site head (R. Fajardo, personal communication,
December 11, 2013), Cavite City is a small but overpopulated city, where even areas that are
supposed to be unfit for habitation have become settlement areas for people. Aside from poor
living conditions, a factor affecting the school performance of children of migrants may also be
the difficulty experienced by some in coping with, and assimilating to, the new environment.
These factors contribute to the high number of out-of-school children, whose many needs merit
additional attention.
The vision of K4 is embodied in the following statement: “School-going and learning-loving Filipino
children who were formerly on the streets” (DTC, 2012).
The vision and mission are clearly focused on developing the life skills and civic skills necessary to
becoming lifelong learners. A strong grounding on “Learning to Live Together” competencies such
as nationalism and citizenship skills is also quite evident in these pronouncements.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
21
4.3.3 Schedule
The K4 programme is for six months,
beginning in November and ending in April.
The November start avoids the rainy season,
which is at its heaviest during the period July
to September. The rainy season brings with it
the possibility of illnesses and of floods that
make navigation of the pushcarts difficult.
Each class, held weekly over the six-month
programme, is two hours in length.
© SEAMEO INNOTECH
4.3.5 Curriculum
The Kariton Klasrum curriculum is primarily life-skills-based. The content includes topics that the
children can easily relate to and appreciate given their conditions and experiences in life. However, the
competencies to be learned are also intended to help address the lack of literacy among these children.
The curriculum and competency guide to be used for every group. has four main units: 1) Self-care
and development (personal); 2) Relating and being one with others (inter-personal); 3) Knowing
and living in one’s community; and 4) Love of country (nationalism), with each unit requiring six
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
meetings (classes).
8 The Functional Literacy Test consists of five key parts, namely: 1) the Personal Information Sheet (PIS) which measures
the learner’s ability to write basic information about oneself, 2) the Reading test which measures understanding of
written selections, 3) the Numeracy test which assesses learner’s ability in basic mathematical operations, 4) the
Writing test which gauges learner’s ability to compose a few sentences and a paragraph, and 5) the Speaking and
Listening test which assesses the skills to listen and evaluate critically oral messages and respond appropriately to
ideas through verbal means.
22
The current curriculum is under ongoing review and therefore might change further. Given that
the K4 is only a six-month programme with weekly classes, the curriculum might eventually
resemble an abridged version of the ALS curriculum.
The themes discussed each week are based on the syllabus prepared for each learners’ group. An
example is the hand-washing lesson. Under “Let’s Play”, a play activity involving pictures might be
implemented. Under “Let’s Explore”, washing of hands is demonstrated. Under “Let’s Think”, there
may be a discussion about the consequences of not washing hands properly.
After all three segments have been completed by each group, all of the groups combine for a
class prayer. Food is then served to the learners, the quantity of which depends on the number of
segments attended (see the Canteen section below).
23
prepared using mostly donated ingredients, and are cooked in different ways to ensure the children
do not tire of the taste. The amount of food that is given to the learners depends on how many learning
segments they have attended. A food chip is awarded to the learner after every learning segment is
completed. One chip is equivalent to either a certain food or a drink. Two chips could earn one a food
and drink combo. Three chips mean that they could avail of a full meal including some or all of the
following bread, soup, biscuits, oatmeal, juice and other items. This system encourages learners to
attend all of the learning segments of each class. This system also aims to teach responsibility and to
teach the children that actions have consequences.
4.3.8 Assessment
The Kariton Klasrum programme makes use of some assessment tools, such as checklists and
observations. No formal learning assessment tools are currently used, however. The initial thinking
supposed that the lack of quizzes and exams would allow the children to enjoy learning more
and this love of learning would consequently encourage them to go back to formal schooling.
This strategy is now under review, however. There is now growing recognition that the learners
should not be taught to shun assessment. Since formal schooling has assessment activities, the
kariton learner should perhaps be prepared for such a learning system. Thus, there are plans
to strengthen classroom-based and performance-based assessment in the succeeding kariton
periods as a strategy to both better monitor learning progress and to provide a bridge to the
learning environment the completers will experience if and when they return to the formal school
system.
In the beginning years of the K4 project, the beneficiaries included children who were attending
school. These children were seen as needing additional support due to their continuing difficulties
in formal school. The DTC Board later decided to focus the K4 services on the school-aged children
who are not in school (i.e. those who have dropped out and those who have never been to
school) because these children have needs that are perceived to be more urgent. Those who are
already in school but need additional support to cope with school are now referred to a new DTC
programme, the Learner’s Educational Aid Program (LEAP).
The number of learners who have passed through the kariton classrooms since the programme
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
began has not been recorded. The DTC noted that in the past they were unequipped to keep a
formal record of the learners. In the most recent kariton period, however, they were able to compile
figures covering two sites in Cavite (see Table 2).
24
Table 2: Number of kariton learners, by age group and sex (2013–14)
AGE GROUP Male Female TOTAL
5–7 13 12 25
8–10 4 1 5
11–12 3 0 3
13–15 6 4 10
TOTAL 26 17 43
Source: Dynamic Teen Company, 2014
According to the figures provided by the DTC, most of the learners belong to the 5 to7 year-
old age group, followed by those aged between 13 and 15. There are more males than females.
According to the DTC Education Head, the total number of learners in 2013–14 was lower than
in previous years.
•• Lack of support from parents – Although many out-of-school youth were identified during the
mapping process, only a handful ended up enlisting in the K4 programme because parents tend
not to be supportive of such activities for their children. This was attributed to various reasons such
as parents’ own lack of education and the consequent lack of belief in non-formal educational
activities as a means to uplift their condition, or the parents’ need to engage the children in
household work or paid work that would augment family income.
•• Return to Formal School – Fewer children at secondary-level are dropping out of formal school,
as a result of changes made in recent years in the formal education system that have reduced
drop-out rates.
•• Outreach Coordinator – She or he supervises and manages all the functions and events related to
the outreach programme.
•• Files and Records Head – She or he keeps records and other files and forms regarding the outreach;
e.g. student enrolment records, attendee lists.
•• Site Head – She or he is responsible for overseeing the entire site operation, and for regularly
meeting with the site volunteers and disseminating information to them.
•• Assistant Site Head – She or he assists the site head in carrying out the assigned tasks, and takes
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
•• Site Education Head – She or he is in charge of carrying out and evaluating the educational
objectives of the programme, and of monitoring the educators and the progress of the learners.
•• Site Volunteers – These site volunteers take on various roles, such as educators, assistant educators,
first aiders, supplies managers, food distributors, marshals, programme coordinators and song
leaders, timekeepers, helpers and kariton pushers. These sub-categories are not mutually exclusive.
Usually volunteers take on multiple roles and they all undergo the trainings for each role.
The positions vary, however, depending on the needs at each site and the number of learners
enlisted.
25
The organizational structure is approximated in Figure 4.
Files and
Records Team
Educators
Table 3 shows the number of volunteers for each assigned position in the various DTC programmes.
DOSE Teachers 5
K4 Educators 18
LEAP Educators 16
Cooks 3
Supplies Staff 3
Volunteer/ Helper, etc. 30
TOTAL 91
Source: Dynamic Teen Company, 2014
26
The records show that there are more female volunteers (57 per cent) compared to male (43
per cent). A significant proportion of the volunteers are aged between 15 and 18 (45 per cent).
Many are high school and college students (52 per cent), while a third of the volunteers are college
graduates who are working (38 per cent).
As of 2013, there was a plan under consideration to have the volunteers sign a six-month contract
so as to ensure a steady roster of volunteers working on K4 every Kariton Klasrum period. In return
for this commitment, the volunteers would receive privileges such as the opportunity to join
special outings and Christmas events (e.g. Pangarap na Pasko).
Private sector partners include academic institutions, which have provided services and
scholarships, and companies that have given donations in the form of school supplies, food and
cash. International organizations, such as SEAMEO INNOTECH, have provided technical assistance
for some aspects of the programme. An international bank gave a grant for the purchase of some
equipment. Many private individuals have also contributed supplies, food and expertise (e.g. medical)
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
to the programme.
27
Table 3: Examples of partners and contributions to the Kariton Klasrum programme
Partner Donation/Contribution
SM Supermalls – SM City Bacoor Kariton Revolution venue and PHP20,000 worth of gift certificates
Golden ABC-Penshoppe Kariton Revolution shirt
McDonald’s Kariton Revolution food
LBC Foundation Document transfer and relief
Sunlife Foundation LEAP assistance project
Abesamis Eye check-up
Sony Philippines Cash from charity event
ARC-RC Cola Kariton Revolution and DTC Pop X Change, 4 scholars
Monde Nissin Monde Nissin biscuits
Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. PHP200,000
UBS 100 + black binding folders
UP College of Dentistry Batch 2013 Dental mission
AMA University Scholarships
Source: Dynamic Teen Company, 2013
4.7.1 On learners
Increase in knowledge and skills
Learners reported that they have acquired literacy and numeracy skills. Some learners reported
having better reading and drawing skills as a result of the kariton programme, while others reported
that their writing skills have progressed.
28
formal records are not kept, the volunteers
reported that quite a number of these
children have actually gone back to school.
Furthermore, those who did re-enter formal
school after participating in the programme
showed more persistence in battling the
challenges related to attending school (e.g.
getting up in the morning, boredom) than
previously.
© SEAMEO INNOTECH
Less disruptive behaviour
Some learners have been observed to
display less unruly and anti-social behaviour as a result of participating in the Kariton Klasrum.
For instance, according to the volunteer teachers, those who had bullying tendencies at the start
were later perceived to have reformed their ways.
4.7.2 On volunteers
Improved leadership, communication and social skills
Volunteering in the programme has
provided opportunities for the volunteers
to enhance their skills in many areas such
as leadership, communication and social
relations. The mentoring and training
sessions have helped the volunteers learn
more about what it takes to be a good
leader. Having to teach children has also
helped hone their public speaking skills,
particularly for those who described © SEAMEO INNOTECH
themselves as inherently quiet and shy.
Following this experience, some volunteers
have been asked to speak at seminars or other public events. The volunteers also reported that
they have become more comfortable with relating to other people (“pakikisama”) and have gained
friends and acquaintances in the process of their volunteer work.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
29
4.7.3 On overall EFA goals
One of the weaknesses of the kariton programme is the dearth of monitoring data that would
help to precisely evaluate the impact and the effectiveness of the programme in terms of the EFA
goals. But some general observations can be made in view of the four Philippine EFA 2015 Goals:
•• Universal coverage of out-of-school youth and adults in the provision of basic learning needs.
It is clear that by providing out-of-school children with literacy and numeracy skills, the Kariton
Klasrum programme has increased access to education, thus assisting efforts towards achieving
universal coverage of out-of-school youth.
•• Universal school participation and total elimination of drop-outs and repeaters in grades 1 to 3.
By equipping learners with skills and encouraging the learners who have completed the kariton
programme to attend school or return to school, the programme is contributing to achieving
universal school participation and to preventing future drop-outs and repeaters.
•• Universal completion of the full basic education cycle with satisfactory annual achievement levels.
The skills gained through the kariton programme assist students who return to school to achieve
better grades.
•• Total community commitment to the attainment of basic education competencies for all.
The community-based nature of the kariton programme builds commitment at the local level for
the attainment by all citizens of basic education skills.
30
tendency of teachers to conduct follow-ups with their students when possible. The relatively
small age difference between kariton teachers and the learners may also contribute to the good
relations between teachers and learners. The volunteer educators are mostly young students
themselves, and they are therefore people that the learners may more easily relate to.
Feeding programme
One of the highly anticipated parts of the Kariton Klasrum programme for the participating
children is the food that is provided to learners. As residents of low-income communities, the
learners understandably look forward to the food, including hot meals, provided at the end of
each class.
31
Mentoring
Related to the previous factors, the sense of community and passion for the cause has spawned
mentoring sessions every Sunday during which the DTC veterans, led by Efren Peñaflorida and
his own mentor, Harnin Manalaysay, hold discussions about leadership, volunteerism and other
topics. These brownbag sessions allow the less experienced volunteers to learn from the leaders.
Hindering factors
A number of factors have been identified that tend to limit the operations of Kariton Klasrum.
32
programme, not many children register in the programme. One cause of this is that many parents
are reluctant to enlist their children in an activity that might compete with their children’s time
for work. There is also the possibility that some parents do not see much value in non-formal
educational activities. The lack of appreciation of parents may be due to the parents’ own lack of
education. There is a need to strengthen advocacy work in this area.
particular unit at the DepEd division level that is assigned to oversee the kariton programme. While
some DepEd staff have been assigned to the programme, these staff have busy schedules. A spate
of calamities in the latter half of 2013 has also been a hindering factor as it has kept the DSWD
busy and thus delayed the implementation of activities related to the Kariton Klasrum programme.
33
contribution has not been forthcoming. It has been surmised that education projects may not be
a top priority of the local government (R. Salonga, personal communication, 13 December2013).
Having new administrators at the helm as a result of the local elections has also been cited as a
factor for the inconsistent support. The quality of relationship between incumbent LGU officials
and DepEd division officials may also be a factor in the progress – or the lack thereof – of a
project or activity. If these two parties do not go along well, lesser assistance can be provided for
education-related projects.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
34
5
Replication of the Kariton
Klasrum programme
Since catching the world’s attention, the Kariton Klasrum programme has gained increased
support at both the local and international levels. The benefits it has brought to the lives of street
children, out-of-school youth and school children who have dropped out of formal schools,
whose diminished access to education had, prior to their participation in the Kariton Klasrum
programme, presented further obstacles to the already-challenging EFA deadline of 2015, has
attracted various groups to replicate the programme. This has led to the expansion of the kariton
programme to cover places beyond the original site of Cavite City where it first began. In these
undertakings, the government, led by the DepEd, as well as non-governmental organizations
and private sector groups, including alumni associations, women’s groups and business leaders’
groups, have pledged their commitment and resources to bring the programme to a greater
number of underprivileged children.
Under this agreement, the tasks of the DepEd include to: (1) acknowledge DTC as an organization
providing ALS, ADM and tutorial programme using its own curriculum, approved by the DepEd, as
well as DepEd-implemented curricula; (2) train DTC volunteer teachers and learning facilitators; (3)
provide initial sets of teaching-learning materials to the trained teachers and facilitators; (4) work
with the DTC on the ongoing review and enhancement of the existing DTC curriculum, modules
and instructional materials; (5) accept test registrants among learners of DTC in the acceleration
schemes provided by DepEd (e.g., A&E test); and (6) implement a massive advocacy campaign.
The obligations of the DTC include to: (1) conduct programme intervention using the ALS
curriculum and ADM modalities; 2) increase the capacity of the volunteers, teachers and facilitators;
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
3) participate in monitoring and evaluation exercises; 4) submit progress and other types of reports
to the DepEd as required; and 5) share best practices in the various interventions implemented
for replication.
The expanded K4 programme was initially implemented in four cities in the Metro Manila area:
Caloocan; Sta. Cruz, Manila; Pasig; and Quezon City. The DepEd team, composed of staff from the
Office of the Secretary and the three bureaus, namely, the Bureau of Elementary Education, the
Bureau of Secondary Education, and the Bureau on Alternative Learning Systems, held meetings
with the local city officials on which specific barangays the K4 Project would be launched in and
when the kariton classes would be held.
35
It was agreed that the classes would be held on Saturdays because many of the volunteer teachers
were regular school teachers who have classes on weekdays. They further agreed that the lessons
would last for two hours, as per the original classes. In keeping with the original programme, it
was agreed that food would be served through a kantin at the end of each class and that children
with illnesses or wounds would be treated through the klinik. The preparation of the pushcarts, to
be designed by the DepEd, would be taken on by the barangay local government units.
A basic curriculum, based on ALS and the Special Education curriculum was then developed
that primarily aims to teach the street children and other out-of-school youth important life
skills, including basic grooming and self-care. But it was decided that the main purpose of the
DepEd programme was to encourage the children to attend school. The first batch of the K4
Project Saturday classes lasted for six months and “graduation” ceremonies were conducted in
the participating cities.
Launched in 2012, the MCCT, like the 4Ps programme, aimed to provide cash transfers, education
and health assistance, to families and children. Unlike the 4Ps programme, the MCCT focuses
specifically on families and children who are in difficult situations or those who are in need of
special protection. It seeks to then mainstream these families later into the regular 4Ps programme.
The target beneficiaries of the MCCT programme include those living in poverty but who are not
covered by the 4Ps, such as homeless and street families, families that have been displaced as a result
of to human-induced and natural disasters, nomadic indigenous peoples, migrant families, families
of children with disabilities, families of child labourers, families in need of special protection and
those living in isolated and disadvantaged areas. Each homeless family is allowed to enrol up to three
children (aged 0 to 14) into the programme, and they receive an allowance of 300 pesos every month
per student. Another 500 pesos is given monthly to the family as a health grant. The beneficiaries are
also given health insurance memberships with the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation. Besides
a monthly grant of up to PHP1,400, the families receive other forms of assistance, including housing
assistance and job opportunities for the improvement of their living conditions. Similar to the 4Ps, the
beneficiaries only receive the cash grants if they comply with certain requirements, as listed below:
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
•• Weekly attendance at Family Development Sessions for the first two months and monthly
attendance in the succeeding months, and family counselling sessions, to enhance knowledge
about proper parenting roles, children’s rights, livelihood skills etc.
•• Attendance at alternative delivery mode classes or formal schools.
•• Periodic visits to health centres for check-ups, growth monitoring and vaccinations for children 0–5
years old; de-worming for 6–14 year-old children; and pre- and post-natal care for pregnant women.
•• Residence in a permanent home after six months of social preparation.
36
Initial impact evaluations conducted on the regular CCT programme have shown promising results,
with the key objectives being reached at an early stage of programme implementation (Chaudhury,
Friedman, Onishi, 2013; Chaudhury and Okamura, 2012). Results include an improvement in the
likelihood of children enrolling and attending school, better long-term nutritional status of young
children (6–36 months old); improved the health-seeking behaviour of poor women through
utilization of maternal and child health services; and better spending patterns of poor households
with regard to health and education needs. The impact of the recently-initiated MCCT programme
on the more vulnerable and marginalized sectors of society have yet to be documented.
The expanded kariton project being implemented by the DSWD and DepEd is viewed as an
opportunity to reach out-of-school children, street children and children in families who are
beneficiaries of the MCCT programme and to encourage them to enrol in ADM programmes that
would help them to return to school. The project also targets child beneficiaries of DSWD-accredited
residential facilities for street children. Its objectives are two-fold: educate street children and to
provide health services and shelter assistance to street families to help ensure their safety and
well-being.
As noted above, the DepEd had a Memorandum of Agreement with the DTC, but for the second phase
of the implementation of the K4, it prepared a Memorandum of Understanding with the DSWD, LGUs,
and civil society organizations. To date, however, this memorandum has not been signed by the DSWD.
Under the agreement between the DepEd and the DSWD, the DepEd would finance the training of
teachers, give service credits to volunteer teachers, coordinate with DSWD officials and cover the rent
for the venue of the second phase of the launch. The DSWD would help the parents and learners
through the CCT. Participating civil society organizations (agreed to provide volunteer teachers, while
barangay officials agreed to provide food, a venue and agreed to cover other related expenses.
To date, the DSWD is still in the process of finalizing the schedule and activities identified for
© DSWD
implementation. Coordination work needed for the kariton programme to be fully integrated in
the MCCT programme was postponed due to several disasters that the Philippines experienced
in 2013 that the DSWD had to prioritize.
In Bacolod City, the capital of Negros Occidental Province in central Philippines, the Kariton Klasrum
programme found its own advocates. In 2012, the St. Scholastica High School Class of 1967 formed its
own version of the programme called Kariton for Kids (K4K). Inspired by the efforts of Efren Peñaflorida
and the DTC, active members of the St. Scholastica High School Class of 1967 group pushed for the
local implementation of the programme to help children stay in school or return to school.
Key members of the group helped develop the curriculum and sample lesson plans, and
contributed materials, food and toys for the children. The support extended by many others proved
critical in getting the programme to move forward. A private tertiary school based in Bacolod
37
City, La Consolacion College, as represented
by its head of student affairs and of the
La Consolacion College National Service
Training Program, invited a whole class
of its education and training programme
students to serve as the initial volunteers
of the programme. The local parish priest
helped find a home for K4K and added his
catechists to the roster of volunteers. The
Bacolod Football Club donated the kariton © SEAMEO INNOTECH
itself. This kariton, unlike the original karitons
used in Cavite, does not contain books,
materials or food. It is just a symbolic pushcart for the K4K.
To raise funds for the project, the Saint Scholastica High School Class of 1967 held a concert,
the funds from which allowed them to bring several DTC members to Bacolod City to train the
volunteers on 23 November 2012. The next day, they began classes for 61 in- and out-of-school
children aged 5 to 17. Six months later, on 18 May 2013, they celebrated the close of their first K4K,
with Efren Peñaflorida and Randie Salonga in attendance.
On 1 June 2013, the Saint Scholastica High School Class of 1967 invited the DepEd ALS Supervisor
and two DSWD street educators to speak in their town hall meeting. The purpose of the gathering
was to open the dialogue on education and their project with the parents and the purok (district)
heads, and to jumpstart registration for the second session, which opened on 22 June 2013. The
K4K programme aims to bring education to children who are less fortunate and to ensure students
not lose interest in school and drop out.
At the start of the first K4K session only 14 children were enrolled in the kariton class. Following
the involvement of the parish church, however, class attendance increased to 45 children.
In the second K4K session, there were 64 learners enrolled, being taught by six K4K teacher
volunteers and seven catechist volunteers.
38
four groups corresponding to the children’s
age brackets. The age groups are as follows:
4–6 years old, 7 years old, 8–10 years old and
11 years old and above.
When asked how these teachers manage the Kariton for Kids classes and how they are able to
engage their learners to study, one of the volunteer teachers explained, “Physical presence of the
teacher is important. I have to get the attention of my learners, who are already near their teenage
years. I want to exercise their minds, so I make use of different activities, like games, that will help
prevent boredom. I am not strict. I do not want them to be scared of me.”
The main objective of the K4K classes is to reinforce the subjects that students learn in school,
including values and cleanliness, but the classes teach three main subjects: Catechism, language
(English and Filipino) and mathematics.
The student and teachers of La Consolacion College were assisted by the catechist volunteers.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
Teachers prepared their own lessons while the site head prepared the modules.
To determine what the children learned in the class sessions, teachers use written tests. The
teachers also hold academic contests at the end of the kariton period to help them assess what
the children learned. For these contests, the implementers give out prizes and food to the children.
A summative test is also conducted.
39
5.3.2 Novaliches City
In Novaliches, Quezon City, barangay officials
led the efforts in implementing another Kariton
Klasrum project. The programme had as many as
40 volunteers, including six teachers, parents and
barangay officials. After the training of the officials,
the barangay held its own training of volunteers.
The barangay also conducted a survey to identify
the ages and expected grade levels of out-of-school
youth and children who could potentially enlist in
the programme.
The classes had 45 learners who joined and completed the programme. The children were grouped
according to age brackets: 5–7 years old, 8–9 years old, 10–12 years old and 13–15 years old.
The classes were similar to the Cavite model, including serving of meals right after each class. The
barangay officials and volunteers serve complete meals including rice, and water to the learners,
including their siblings and parents.
Aside from the DepEd, DTC and the barangay, this particular K4 project was championed by
the Doña Rosario Elementary School, the Doña Rosario High School, and non-governmental
organizations like the Caritas Foundation and the Madrigal Foundation.
40
The site experienced challenges such as insufficient number of books for the learners, the
curriculum not being issued to all volunteer teachers, and inconsistent attendance of the learners,
many of whom were working to augment the family income.
The Division of Caloocan City launched this programme on 4 February 2012 in Bagong Barrio
Elementary School. After the launching, a three-day seminar was conducted to train the volunteer
teachers on the correct way of teaching street children. The seminar was facilitated by DepEd
and DTC representatives. On 18 February 2012, a barangay mapping activity was conducted to
determine the number of children who could benefit most from the programme.
The first gathering of the Kariton Klasrum learners took place on 3 March 2013 at Bagong Barrio
Elementary School. During kariton classes, lessons were provided to street children by street
educators and volunteers through the use of Montessori materials. The curriculum covers a range
of subjects, including values formation, basic literacy, numeracy and life skills.
A major challenge that the site experienced was the difficulties of the volunteers in managing their
time, which led to their inability to provide classes consistently. Thus only a few kariton sessions
took place. The DepEd, in their 2013 monitoring report, found that only two sessions had been
conducted since the programme was launched.
Despite the problems encountered, 29 Kariton Klasrum learners were reported to have later
enrolled in Bagong Barrio Elementary School as returning students. A total of 16 of them are
still enrolled in the K4 programme for tutorial and remedial classes. A further six Kariton Klasrum
learners transferred to ALS Secondary.
Starting in January 2012, the programme in Pasig City was able to serve 12 street children in two
sites, namely, Ramos Village and Barangay Catleya. The children were divided into the following
age groups: 5–7 years old, 8–9 years old and 10–12 years old. Around 38 volunteers including
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
teachers, parents, students and the barangay council, including the captain, were involved in this
project. The curriculum that was used covers values education, numeracy and literacy.
According to the 2013 DepEd monitoring report, the Pasig site has had only one kariton session
since its soft launch. The programme was beset by issues such as minimal barangay support,
unavailability of supplies and materials for the children, a lack of funds, the volunteer teachers’
conflicting schedules, lukewarm response from the parents, insufficient medical supplies, a lack
of permanent volunteers and the absence of a permanent venue.
41
5.3.5 Sta. Ana, Manila
In partnership with the DepEd and Dynamic Teen Company, the Division of City Schools of Manila
adopted, in March 2012, the Kariton Klasrum learning modality as a strategy to broaden access to
basic education among the street children in Sta. Ana, Manila. It envisioned the programme as a
means to provide alternative education for the children, to help them gain basic literacy skills, and
to bring them back into formal school to complete their basic education.
An orientation training was conducted for barangay volunteers before classes started. At the
outset, the street children were given school supplies, shoes and bags. The DepEd central office
assisted by donating one kariton to the barangay. The barangay also coordinated with the health
centre and the Department of Health in the de-worming of the children and in the provision
of medicine for leptospirosis, respectively. A medical mission was also conducted, involving
immunization for the children. In a similar way to other kariton programmes, snacks were served
to the children after each class. As a result of the programme, 14 out of the 25 enrolled learners
were enrolled in formal school.
This programme in Sta. Ana encountered multiple challenges that hindered its implementation,
such as donated textbooks not being suited to the children’s levels, unfulfilled promises, failure of
the volunteer teachers to continue their efforts, a lack of financial support for the various activities
and a lack of regular monitoring. The 2013 DepEd monitoring report stated that the Sta. Ana
Kariton Klasrum programme has been temporarily suspended due to the unavailability of the
ALS teachers.
5.4.1 Indonesia
On 1 July 2013, in one of the underprivileged communities in Klendar, East Jakarta, the non-profit
organization Yayasan Wadah Titian Harapan (Wadah), launched a programme called Gerobak Pintar
(Smart Cart) which is modelled on the DTC’s Kariton Klasrum programme. Wadah, a Jakarta-based
foundation that was founded to help mothers create a better future for their families and their
communities, sought the help of DTC in implementing the programme. Since Indonesia and the
Philippines share similar problems regarding poverty and education, the Indonesian programme
hopes to make the same positive impact that has been made in the lives of Filipino children.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
42
The Gerobak Pintar programme was initiated by Wadah’s founder, Ibu Anie Hashim Djojohadikusumo,
to help address the literacy needs of urban poor children who do not have the resources and
opportunity to go to school. It is expected that the programme will help increase awareness in the
local communities about the importance of education for their children’s future. In preparing for
the project rollout in Jakarta, the DTC conducted visits in Jakarta, while volunteers from Indonesia
also went to Manila to be trained by the DTC team.
Gerobak Pintar provides services in four areas, namely: education, health, food supplements, and
life skills training for parents. Since Wadah is a women’s organization that advocates for women’s
rights and welfare, the last component was added in order to educate mothers on livelihoods and
child-rearing.
The programme will be operated and facilitated by Wadah activists and volunteers for three
months, after which it will be turned over to the communities. The communities will continue to
be supervised by Wadah, and support will also come from the donors, including the Rotary Club
of South Jakarta.
5.4.2 Kenya
Launched on 28 September 2013 at Farasi Primary School in Nairobi, the Kenyan pushcart
classroom project is the second international replication of the Kariton Klasrum programme.
A network of business leaders who are members of the Young Presidents’ Organization, Nairobi
Chapter, and Efren Peñaflorida of DTC, serving as the guest speaker, launched the project. During
the launch, Efren shared his story and spoke about how the pushcart classroom programme
operates in the Philippines.
The Young Presidents’ Organization built a pushcart for the Kenyan programme. As in the original
kariton programme, the pushcart contains books and learning materials. Following the launch of
the programme, the equipped pushcart was turned over to the head of Farasi Primary School. To
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
date, there are no details available about the progress of the Kenyan programme.
43
© Dynamic Teen Company © Dynamic Teen Company
Conclusion
The local and international adaptations have established programmes that are true to the vision
of the original Kariton Klasrum initiatives. These programmes have a common goal of providing
education to poor children and out-of-school children and youth with the aim of encouraging
them to stay in school or return to school.
The main elements of the K4, namely, the classroom, canteen and clinic, are present in some form
or another, in all of the local replications of the programme. There are notable variations in the way
these elements are implemented, however. Also, the duration of the kariton teaching period varies
across the sites, because of the variation in financial and human resources available.
Bacolod City’s K4K has made key changes to the original model. For instance, the use for the
pushcart was merely symbolic. Furthermore, the focus of the curriculum is on catechism and
academic subjects, rather than on life skills. The K4K classes are dominated by in-school children
who need learning assistance in order to stay in school. In this sense, the K4K is akin to a drop-out
reduction programme.
Adaptations of the Kariton Klasrum initiative had also added the requirement of formative and
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
summative tests. And some adaptations have added additional services. For example, the Bacolod
site also provides livelihood training sessions for parents while their children are in class.
In general, however, the sites implement programmes that are similar in key ways. These
similarities include:
•• The role of the DTC in the training of the organizers and volunteers.
•• The classification of children in all the replication sites is based on age (although DTC has already
changed their classification to be based on literacy level).
44
•• Each site conducts community mapping prior to the start of the classes to identify the children
who may benefit most from the programme.
•• Each site relies on volunteers, who do not receive any compensation for their services. But they get
to enjoy incentives during the course of their service, such as trainings, transportation allowances
and snacks.
Among the more successful adaptations, two factors emerge as vital to their success. One is
the core of volunteers whose dedication to service has allowed the programme to continue
and thrive. Second is the commitment and support of other stakeholders, including the DepEd,
the DTC, local governments, academe, the church, parents and other government agencies and
non-governmental organizations. The assistance they provide in the form of capacity-building,
funds, food, materials, venue and others have sustained the programmes beyond the launching.
In successful sites, the impact of the programme has been seen immediately, with teachers and
parents reporting an improvement in the attitudes and performance of the children.
The sites that have been relatively unsuccessful have experienced several main challenges
including a lack of committed volunteers to provide consistent services, a lack of funds and a lack
of appropriate teaching-learning materials.
45
6 The case of a former Kariton
learner
A boy saunters in from outside the principal’s office. Sporting an impish smile and twinkling eyes,
he has the typical look of a boy his age. Caster is an 11-year-old, fun-loving and carefree boy from
Cavite City. He is currently in Grade 6, a student at the Manuel Rojas Elementary School. He is the
oldest of four siblings. His mother is a housewife while his father works as a soldier at the naval
base in Sangley Point, Cavite. He dreams of becoming a soldier one day, just like his father. That
dream was jeopardized, however, when Caster, at ten years old, dropped out of school.
He was in Grade 4 when his difficulties in going to school began to mount. He could not get up
early for his classes at Manuel Rojas. He often missed his morning class and was able to attend
only the afternoon sessions. Many times, he would be late and would not end up going to class.
His considerable number of absences was unacceptable to the school, and the boy eventually
dropped out. With nothing to do at home but watch television, play and roam outside, he soon
got bored. He then heard about the Kariton Klasrum programme from his neighbours. He wanted
to be part of it, and asked his parents to register him. His parents agreed. It was clear though that
this was Caster’s decision. When asked why he decided to do so, he said that he wanted to learn.
He also had a few friends who had registered. It seemed to be fun. And he had nothing to do
anyway.
The DTC volunteers went to Caster’s house to verify with the parents Caster’s decision to register.
The only thing they requested was the child’s birth certificate. Caster thus found himself attending
the kariton programme. That was the start of his Kariton Klasrum experience, an experience that
ended with his “graduation” from the programme, but whose impact is continuing to be felt
beyond.
46
Caster does not remember much about what was taught in class. He did recall learning about the
“go, grow, glow” food. He also remembered learning to be polite and to say the words “po” and
“opo”. He does not remember if he learned mathematics under the kariton programme.
When he finished the programme six months later, he received a certificate for being second in class.
When Kariton Klasrum ended, Caster decided he would go back to Manuel Rojas school to continue
his studies. His interest in learning had been reignited while he was a Kariton Klasrum learner.
Before school at Manuel Rojas started, Caster received school supplies from DTC in a ceremony that
marked the end of the Kariton Klasrum period. As Caster’s mother gratefully noted, these school
supplies were one of the most significant material benefits Caster received from the programme.
She also observed that after participating in the programme her son did not go out on the streets
as much as before. He was also seen drawing and writing more and was eating better. It was no
longer difficult for him to wake up early in the morning to go to school, his mother observed. He
also had become more polite in his dealings with others. It was significant, she felt, that it was
Caster’s decision to go back to school.
At formal school
Back at formal school, Caster is considered by his class adviser to be like any other regular schoolboy
his age. According to the adviser, Caster loves to play and engages in play every opportunity he
gets. He is friendly and always has a ready smile on his face. He sometimes lacks focus and is often
caught in class chatting to his seatmates Caster sometimes participates in class, especially when it
involves stories that interest him. Although he talks to classmates during class, once his attention
is re-called, he immediately re-focuses on the teacher. He is easily influenced by friends though,
especially when it involves playing. Just like any other child, he needs guidance. When he gets
carried away doing something that is not appropriate at that moment, he needs to be called
out and reminded to refocus, to study and to listen. But he is not really much different from any
average boy, according to his teacher..
Caster once admitted to his teacher that he used to be frequently absent when he was younger
but has changed since then. He proudly shared that he had not been absent in once in the first
few months of the school year, a direct contrast to his past attendance. The teacher, however,
noted that Caster began being absent from class later in the school year, which she attributed to
the break in momentum that the rainy season’s frequent suspension of classes brought. According
to Caster those absences were due to either family activities or to sickness.
Caster was perceived to sometimes lack focus. His teacher therefore seated him in the front row
in class, so that his attention can be more easily gained. It is because of this lack of focus that
Caster expresses having difficulties with his academic work. He noted, however, that when he
tries his best to focus, he gets the work done. But he needs to be reminded and guided often, a
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
responsibility the teacher admits is not an easy one for someone handling 40 or so students in a
class.
The teacher noted that the good thing about the boy is that his attention can be re-called easily,
and the boy immediately responds in a positive manner to the numerous reminders that he gets.
Furthermore, he is not a rude child. He knows how to be respectful. From the teacher’s vantage
point, Caster is not much different from the others. While Caster may have some areas he definitely
needs to work on, the foundation is solid enough for what he learns to take root.
47
Caster noted that there are some key differences between his Kariton Klasrum experience and
his formal school one. In the kariton programme, he noted, there are no assignments or tests and
there is plenty of play. In Manuel Rojas school, the opposite is true. Quite unexpectedly, Caster
did express his liking for assignments, however, because it made him stay home at night instead
of going out to play.
Conclusion
The kariton programme has helped Caster by bringing back the boy’s interest in learning. This
is significant, as it indicates that a key factor missing in formal education, which the kariton
programme recognizes as being important, is the joy of learning. Even though Caster did not
recall exactly what he had learned, he had been able to learn the required skills, as evidenced by
his certificate for being second in class. And he was able to learn the required skills through play, a
mode of learning that suits Caster’s learning style. The absence of this type of learning from formal
education system makes learning difficult for children like Caster, and thus puts these children at
risk of dropping out of school.
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
48
7
Conclusions and
recommendations
Kariton learner
A major part of what the Philippines committed to in Dakar in 2000 was reaching the marginalized
and the underserved. Achieving the Education for All goals means that the needs and circumstances
of the poorest, the most vulnerable and the most neglected of our children and youth have to
be urgently attended to and addressed. Many groups remain on the fringes of society and their
presence signals society’s failure to address the structural disparities and the inequalities based on
gender, wealth, ethnicity, disability, language and many other factors, that allow for these social
exclusions to happen.
Mindful of this reality, the Philippines continues to work on its targets in literacy and education
based on its commitment to the World Declaration on Education for All. While there is sober
recognition that the country will likely fail to make the grade in several areas come 2015, the
country continues to be steadfast in its efforts to inch closer towards the EFA goals. The Kariton
Klasrum constitutes one such effort.
The Kariton Klasrum is an innovative initiative that recognizes the need for new approaches that are
tailor-made for vulnerable groups such as street children and out-of-school youth. It puts premium
on the idea that in order for the country to fast track its progress towards EFA, it is no longer sufficient
to use the conventional system in addressing the educational needs of the marginalized children in
disadvantaged settings. It underscores the reality that government alone cannot do the job and that
given the enormity of the EFA challenge, the non-governmental sector and non-school systems play
a critical role.
The following points summarize the findings of this case study about the K4 programme, which
was founded and initially implemented by the Dynamic Teen Company:
•• The K4 programme originally focused on street children, but included all out-of-school children
and youth. The focus on these children who are not attending school, because they are working
to augment family income and scavenging in the dumps, is noteworthy in light of the limited
opportunities that are available to this group of children.
•• The K4 brings the “classroom” to the communities where the children live or converge. It provides
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
the learning materials and environment for them (kariton klasrum), and offers food (kantin) and
first aid services (klinik) as well. It puts in place a system that does not place any financial burden
on the learners and that tries to be responsive to the learners’ needs and realities. It is a system
that improves access and affordability of education for previously excluded children. Moreover,
it upholds the children’s right to education as well as the children’s rights to health and nutrition.
•• The Kariton Klasrum volunteer educators are provided with training that equips them to teach
more effectively in a non-classroom setting with disadvantaged children who have limited or no
experience of formal school. They are given orientations about the situation of the children who
49
will be put under their charge. It is important for these volunteers to have a deep understanding
of the plight of these children to have a better understanding of their needs and address these
more effectively. Volunteers tasked with the other aspects of the programme are likewise
provided training sessions to help them with their tasks. These investments in volunteer training
are essential in providing good quality education.
•• The K4 curriculum that the DTC initially developed was life skills-based, as does the ALS curriculum
of the Department of Education. By using a curriculum that aims to develop “knowledge
and competencies necessary for the effective participation in solving real-life problems and
in functioning effectively in society” (BALS, n.d.), the children are exposed to a more relevant
education that increases their chances of becoming functionally literate, becoming lifelong
learners and returning successfully to formal school.
•• The community mapping conducted prior to the start of each Kariton period is a good practice
that needs to be continued. This activity proactively seeks out children and youth that would
benefit most from the programme.
•• Although the data provided by the DTC on the number and gender of learners, it appears that there is
a higher number of male learners among kariton learners. This reflects the observed gender disparity
in Philippine education where more females than males tend to persist in the formal education
system. More males are found among the drop-outs and among the street children (Lamberte, 2002).
This gender disparity has been attributed to several factors, among which are the parents’ low
academic expectation for boys and the tendency of poor families to pull out the boys from school
and involve them in work that would augment the family income (UNICEF, 2012).
•• Volunteers are at the core of the Kariton Klasrum programme. Without volunteers, the programme
would not have become viable or sustainable. There is some evidence to suggest, based on the
limited data available on kariton volunteers, that the majority of the volunteers are teenagers who
are studying in high school and college. This seems to be the age group that is most attracted or
most available to volunteer in such a set-up. The strong idealism that typically characterizes the
adolescents may be at play here. Based on the interviews conducted, the motives for entering the
volunteer service are the need for satisfaction, achievement, and meaningfulness; the need for
self-improvement; the positive experiences from involvement in a related activity or programme;
and the referral of peers or teachers. These are similar to the motives cited in a broader study on
volunteerism among Filipinos (Aguiling-Dalisay, et al, 2004).
•• The study by Aguiling-Dalisay and colleagues (2004) indicates that the reasons for staying in volunteer
service tend to be instrinsic in nature, such as a strong altruistic motive (e.g. desire to be of service to
others, commitment to the cause) or motives related to self (e.g. sense of satisfaction and achievement
derived from continued service; sense of purpose and personal meaning). The experience of the DTC’s
Kariton Klasrum in Cavite, while not immune to volunteer attrition, may be instructive in that their
core of committed volunteers has remained fairly stable. This core of volunteers has confirmed during
the interviews that these intrinsic motives are the ones that sustain their interest to volunteer. The
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
opportunities for self-improvement that volunteering has provided them are some of the things they
are grateful for as well. These come by way of formal skills trainings, mentoring sessions and interactions
with different types of people. In addition, organizational support and organizational policies that
promote a positive and healthy work environment tend to sustain the volunteers. Dissatisfaction with
the practices and systems within the organization may prompt volunteers to discontinue.
•• The issue of volunteer sustainability is a major challenge that has been raised at the original Cavite
site and at the replication sites. It seems an accepted reality that not all volunteers who start out
will end up completing the service or will consistently show up during the classes. It is necessary
50
to find a solution to this issue, however, because a very high rate of attrition among the volunteers
compromises the effectiveness of the programme. This may have been a key issue beleaguering
the less successful replication sites. Organizations that largely depend on volunteers may have to
re-examine their policies and practices that tend to push volunteers away from the service.
•• The participation of partners and other stakeholders is critical to the success and sustainability of
the programme. These stakeholders include local government units, other government agencies,
non-governmental organizations, academe, corporate groups and foundations and parents. The
Cavite site, while having some minor issues with LGU support, continues to enjoy broad support from
many sectors. Other replication sites would do well to look for more partners who can champion the
programme.
•• The involvement of the Department of Education and the Department of Social Welfare and
Development has shown the government’s commitment to deliver alternative learning systems and
non-formal education to disadvantaged children. The current Secretary of the DepEd, Bro. Armin
Luistro, had expressed his wish for a Kariton Klasrum programme in every division (R. Salonga, personal
communication, December 13, 2013). The support of the government in expanding the K4 programme,
as well as integrating it in the country’s flagship poverty reduction programme, offers the promise of
giving significantly greater numbers of poor and disadvantaged children access to education.
•• The inclusion of the Kariton Klasrum in the DSWD’s MCCT programme promises to be a significant
boost towards achieving the EFA goals. Social protection measures such as the conditional cash
transfer as implemented in the Philippines have been shown to increase school enrolment among
younger children (3–11 years old) and to improve school attendance among 6–17 year olds of the
poor families targeted in the 4Ps programme (World Bank, 2013). Once the Kariton Klasrum becomes
fully integrated into the MCCT programme, larger numbers of children will have the opportunity to
benefit from this alternative mode of education and returning eventually to formal schooling.
Recommendations
Analysis of the findings of the case study has resulted in a number of recommendations on how
the Kariton Klasrum model might be strengthened as listed below.
•• Standardize the curriculum being used across all the local sites. The existing ALS curriculum
developed by the Department of Education may be a good starting point because it is also
life-skills-based and has benefited much from the knowledge and expertise of the specialists
at DepEd. This curriculum could be further adapted to specifically suit the time-frame and
beneficiaries being targeted by Kariton Klasrum, i.e. street children and out-of-school children
and youth. Corollary to this, a standardized set of learning materials appropriate to the needs and
realities of the children being served, may also be worth developing. It should be ensured that the
content and images of these materials are free from gender stereotypes so as not to, among other
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
•• The sustainability of volunteering depends to a large extent on the ability of the organization
to accord volunteers due respect and provide them with the capacity to realize their desire to
51
serve. It is therefore recommended to strengthen the organizational support being provided
to the Kariton Klasrum volunteers, to strengthen their resolve to stay and continue their
service. For instance, provide materials that they can use for visual aids, instead of relying
on the volunteers’ initiative or resources to come up with such. Moreover, ensure that the
conditions within the organization (e.g. policies and activities) create a nurturing and positive
environment for the volunteers.
•• Since the Kariton Klasrum relies heavily on volunteers, its volunteer programme may have to be
further reviewed and professionalized. The “volunteer head” within DTC, as well as in the other
replication sites, has to be adequately trained to harness both the people and technical skills of
the volunteers. Furthermore, a comprehensive training programme for the volunteers needs to
be put in place. While there are already existing trainings and mentoring sessions being provided
to the kariton volunteers, a more professional training programme, attuned to the needs of both
the volunteers and learners, has to be developed.
•• Advocacy to enlist parents’ and communities’ support needs to be strengthened. Since some
parents tend to discourage their children’s involvement in the kariton programme, a parents’
orientation at the outset may increase their understanding of the programme and help reduce
their resistance. Livelihood sessions for parents, as practiced at the Bacolod site, could also increase
the parents’ acceptance of the programme.
•• While the kariton programme is to be commended for bringing the classroom closer to its
target beneficiaries, the harsh environment of the streets may also compromise the quality of
education being provided. The heat, rain, noise and pollution may influence the capacity of
the children to absorb and learn. It is recommended that providers of the kariton programme
consider looking for areas or venues that are accessible to the children but are more protected
from the elements.
•• As is now being done by the DTC in the Cavite site, it is recommended that providers of the
kariton system categorize the learners according to level of literacy instead of age. This recognizes
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
the possibility that the differences in the literacy level among learners within an age bracket
might impede the efficiency of learning. The existing Functional Literacy Test of the DepEd may
be used for this purpose in order to maximize the resources and mechanisms that are already in
place.
•• Develop an effective monitoring and evaluation system for the K4 programme by creating
an enabling environment that would support such a system, and building the capacity and
infrastructure that would supply information. For one, this means that a credible and systematic
data and information-gathering system needs to be established. In line with this, a database
52
of learners, volunteers, and partners, which would contain basic personal and demographic
information about them, has to be created. It is recommended that these data be disaggregated
according to sex, age, literacy level, number of siblings, whether working or not, whether staying
with parents or not and other relevant variables. Providers of the programme will need to train
staff to gather and analyze the data. Once an M&E system has been put in place – founded on
the principles of transparency, objectivity, and accountability – there should be an assessment of
the kariton programme in terms of its impact on achieving the overall Philippine EFA goals 2015,
particularly on Goal 1.
53
References
Aguiling-Dalisay, G., Yacat, J. and Navarro, A. 2004. Extending the Self: Volunteering as Pakikipagkapwa. Quezon City,
University of the Philippines.
Alberto, J., Quimba, F. and Ramos, A. 2011. Why are some Filipino Children not in School?, PIDS Policy Notes. dirp4.pids.gov.
ph/ris/pn/pidspn1116.pdf (Accessed 25 September 2013.)
Araullo, A. 2013. DSWD, DepEd Launch ‘Kariton’ Classrooms. 18 April 2013, ABS-CBN News. http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/
focus/04/18/13/dswd-deped-launch-kariton-classrooms (Accessed 15 September 2013.)
Bacos, F. F., Rita, M. A., Ramirez, M., Dorado, J. B., Velasco, R. E. and Barba, C. VC. 2008. The nutritional status of street children
– why some are nutritionally well-off or worst-off. Food and Nutrition Research Institute Philippine Digest. http://www.fnri.
dost.gov.ph/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=935 (Accessed 6 September 2013.)
Bahay T. 2009. Sagip o Huli? Rescue of Street Children in Caloocan, Pasay and Quezon Cities. http://www.crin.org/resources/
infodetail.asp?ID=20746 (Accessed 15 September 2013.)
Bautista, V., Roldan, A. and Garces-Bacsa, M. 2001. Working with Abused Children from the Lenses of Resilience and
Contextualization, Quezon City, Save the Children Sweden, UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies, and UP
CIDS Psychosocial Trauma and Human Rights Program.
Buendia, R., Gregorio, J., Molera, R. A., Flor, B. G., Vergel de Dios, B., Ganibe, J. W., Balonkita, A. G., Dawang, C. and Mirandilla,
N. 2011. Philippine Education Sector Assessment Project. Pasig City, International Technology Management Corporation.
https://www.academia.edu/1433995/Philippine_Education_Sector_Assessment_Report
Bureau of Alternative Learning Systems. n.d. Alternative Learning System. Unpublished handout.
Cavite Provincial Planning and Development Office. 2012. Cavite Socio-Economic and Physical Profile 2012. Cavite, Provincial
Government of Cavite. www.cavite.gov.ph/home/multimedia%20files/SEPP/2012/SEPP2012.zip (Accessed 16 November
2013)
_____2011. Cavite Socio-Economic and Physical Profile 2011. Cavite, Provincial Government of Cavite. http://www.cavite.
gov.ph/home/index.php/general-information/socio-economic-profile/sepp-2011 (Accessed 25 September 2013.)
Chaudhury, N. and Okamura, Y. 2012. Conditional Cash Transfers and School Enrollment: Impact of the Conditional Cash
Transfer Program in the Philippines. Philippine Social Protection Note, July 2012, No. 6. Manila, The World Bank Group and
Australian AID. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/08/20/000386194_2012082
0023407/Rendered/PDF/719040BRI0P1180m0in0the0Philippines.pdf (Accessed 15 January 2014.)
Commission on Audit 2010. 2010 Annual Financial Report for Local Governments. Manila, Government of the Republic of
the Philippines. http://www.coa.gov.ph/index.php/local-government-units-lgus/2010
De Gracia, A. 2012. Buhay Kariton. 6 June 2012. The Pinoy Warrior. http://www.thepinoywarrior.com
Fondation Sanofi Espoir. 2012. Treating Street Children of Manila, Philippines. http://www.fondation-sanofi-espoir.com/en/
ngo_virlanie.php (Accessed 6 September 2013.)
Gallard, J.C. and Cadag, J.R.D. 2009. From marginality to further marginalization: Experiences from the victims of the July 2000
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
Payatas trash slide in the Philippines. Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, Vol 2, No. 3, pp. 197–215.
KidsRights Foundation and Leiden University. 2012. Street children have rights too! Problems faced by street children
globally and in the Philippines, and why their rights need protection. http://www.kidsrights.nl/Portals/0/KVP/Kidsreport%20
Street%20Children%20Have%20Rights%20too%20v3%20kopie.pdf
Lamberte, E.E. (Ed.) 2001. Ours to Protect and Nurture. Manila: De la Salle University, Social Development Research Center.
National EFA Committtee. 2014. Philippine Education for All 2015 Plan of Action: An Assessment of Progress Made in Achieving
the EFA Goals. In Press.
54
National Statistics Office. 2012. 2010 Census of Population and Housing. Manila, Government of the Republic of the
Philippines.
Njord, L. et al. 2008. Characterizing health behaviours and infectious disease prevalence among Filipino street children,
International Journal of Adolescence Medicine and Health, Vol. 20 No. 3), pp. 267–374.
Nugroho, D., Parker, B., Moran, C., Sugden, C., Floyd, K. and Brindley, C. 2008. Sagip or Huli? Indiscriminate Rescue of
Street Children in the City of Manila. http://resourcecentre.savethechildren.se/sites/default/files/documents/2249.pdf
(Accessed 15 September 2013.)
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2012. Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Children Working
and/or Living on the Street. Geneva, OHCHR. http://hchr.org.mx/files/doctos/OHCHRBrochureStreetChildren.pdf
(Accessed 23 September 2013.)
Pomm, J. 2005. At the Margins: Street and Working Children in Cebu City, Philippines. Masters thesis. http://www.bata-
kinderhilfe.org/files/downloads/At-the-Margins-Street-and-Working-Children.pdf
SEAMEO INNOTECH. 2014. Philippine Education for All 2015 Plan of Action: An Assessment of Progress Made in Achieving the
EFA Goals. Quezon City, SEAMEO INNOTECH.
Silva, T. 2003. A Situationer of Street Children in the Philippines. Paper presented at the Civil Society Forum on Promoting
and Protecting the Rights of Street Children in Southeast Asia, Bangkok, Thailand, 12–14 March 2003.
_____2002. Preventing child exploitation on the streets in the Philippines. The Lancet, Vol. 360, 9 November 2002. http://
www.crin.org/docs/ChildHope.pdf
Soale, P. 2004. Responding to the Plight of Children in the Street: An Evaluation of NGO Programme Interventions in Manila (The
Philippines). (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Birmingham.
Thomas De Benitez, S. 2011. State of the World’s Street Children: Research. London, Consortium for Street Children. http://
www.streetchildren.org.uk/_uploads/publications/State_of_the_Worlds_Street_Children_Research_final_PDF_online.
pdf (Accessed 27 September 2013.)
UNICEF. 2011. Global Study on Child Poverty and Disparities: National Report Philippines. Makati City, UNICEF.
UNICEF. 2012. The State of the World’s Children 2012: Children in an Urban World. New York, UNICEF.
UNICEF and UIS. 2012. Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children: Philippine Country Study. Unpublished report.
University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Development Studies – Psychosocial Trauma and Human Rights
Program (UP CIDS PST). 2003. Painted Gray Faces Behind Bars and in the Streets: Street Children and the Juvenile Justice
System in the Philippines. Quezon City, UP CIDS PST and Consortium for Street Children. http://www.pstcrrc.org/docs/
Painted_Gray_Faces_Behind_Bars_And_In_The_Streets.pdf (Accessed 7 February 2014.)
World Bank. 2013. Philippines Conditional Cash Transfer Program: Impact Evaluation 2012. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/
external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/02/14/000442464_20140214112423/Rendered/PDF/755330REVISE
D00T0Final0Version00c20.pdf (Accessed 15 January 2014.)
World Health Organization. 1995. Working with Street Children. Module 1: A Profile of Street Children. A Training Package on
Substance Abuse, Sexual and Reproductive Health including HIV/AIDS and STDs. Geneva, WHO. http://whqlibdoc.who.
int/hq/2000/WHO_MSD_MDP_00.14_Module1.pdf (Accessed 20 September 2013.)
The Philippines: Kariton Klasrum
55
UNESCO Bangkok Office
Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education
Mom Luang Pin Malakul Centenary Building
920 Sukhumvit Road, Prakanong, Klongtoey
Bangkok 10110, Thailand
Email: appeal.bgk@unesco.org
Website: www.unesco.org/bangkok
Tel: +66-2-3910577 Fax: +66-2-3910866