Group A _ Khaira Liza

2. Report the bar chart

a. students expected education by their gender

Expected education * gender Crosstabulation

Count

Gender

female seller male seller Total

Expected education S1 14 6 20

S2 2 10 12

S3 6 13 19
Total 22 29 51

The bart chart shows the students expected education by the gender that is categorized into
three groups; S1, S2 and S3.

The female students that their expected education on S1 is the highest among those groups
with the total number 14 students. Meanwhile the male students that their expected
education on S1 is 6. The second highest number comes from S3 group. In this group, male
students that their expected education on S3 is higher than female students. The number of
male students that expect S3 is 13, meanwhile the female students that expect S3 is 6.
The group of students that expect S2 is lowest among those groups. The number of male
students that expect S2 is also higher than female students. The number of male students that
expect S2 is 10 and the number of female students that expect S2 is 2.

Overall it can bee seen that most of the students expect education level on S1.

b. Students SES by their gender

SES status * gender Crosstabulation

Count

gender

female seller male seller Total

SES status LOW INCOME 6 15 21

MEDIUM INCOME 7 4 11

HIGH INCOME 9 10 19
Total 22 29 51
The bart chart shows the students’ social economic status by the gender that is categorized
into three groups; low income, medium income and high income.

The male students that belongs to low income status is the highest among those groups with
the total number 15 students. Meanwhile the female students that belong to low income is
6. The second highest is the male students that belongs to high income with 10 total number.
Whilst the number of female students that belongs to high sincome is 9. It is not
significance difference.

Meanwhile in medium income group, the number of female studensts is higher than male
students. It is the lowest group among them. The number of female students in medium
income is 7 and the number of male students in medium income is 4.Overall it can bee seen
that most of the students have low social economic status or low income.

3. Check whether the data is normally distributed

Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Students stress in Statistics

,122 51 ,054 ,959 51 ,077
class
Thesis score ,096 51 ,200* ,969 51 ,193
Research method score ,118 51 ,071 ,961 51 ,091

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

From the table, it shows the significant number of each subject. Students stress in Statistic is
0,077, Thesis score is 0,193, and Research method score is 0,091 All of the significance
values are greater than 0,05. It means all of data are normally distributed.

4. Find if there significance difference.

a. thesis score by gender (T-test)

Group Statistics

gender N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Thesis score female seller 22 154,32 42,271 9,012

male seller 29 145,72 39,651 7,363

 Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence
Interval of the

Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error Difference

F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper

Thesis Equal
score variances ,434 ,513 ,745 49 ,460 8,594 11,534 -14,584 31,772
assumed

Equal
variances not ,738 43,767 ,464 8,594 11,638 -14,863 32,051
assumed

From the table it can be seen that the sig value is 0,513 and it is greater than 0,05. It means
the data is homogen. t value for equal variance assumed is 0,745 and t value for equal
variances not assumed is 0,738. And degree of freedom (df) is 49. Sig 2-tailed are 0,460 and
0,464. The interval confidence is between -14,584 (lower) and 31,772( upper).

b. thesis score by year level

ANOVA
Thesis score

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 2616,649 2 1308,325 ,786 ,461

Within Groups 79851,860 48 1663,580
Total 82468,510 50
 Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Thesis score
Tukey HSD

Mean 95% Confidence Interval

(I) What year are you (J) What year are you Difference (I- Std. Lower Upper
in university? in university? J) Error Sig. Bound Bound

1st year 2nd year 16,361 13,307 ,442 -15,82 48,54

3rd year 5,801 15,027 ,921 -30,54 42,14

2nd year 1st year -16,361 13,307 ,442 -48,54 15,82
3rd year -10,560 14,394 ,745 -45,37 24,25
3rd year 1st year -5,801 15,027 ,921 -42,14 30,54

2nd year 10,560 14,394 ,745 -24,25 45,37

Descriptives
Thesis score

95% Confidence Interval for

Std. Mean

N Mean Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

1st year 17 157,65 39,976 9,696 137,09 178,20 78 210

2nd year 21 141,29 38,584 8,420 123,72 158,85 78 224
3rd year 13 151,85 45,192 12,534 124,54 179,16 64 210
Total 51 149,43 40,612 5,687 138,01 160,85 64 224

The Anova tests revealed the significant difference on students thesis score and year .
(F[2,48])=0,786, p=0,461. The result from the Tukey post hoc analysis showed that students
on 1st year reported get highest score in thesis score (M=157, SD=40) compare to 2nd year
(M=141, SD=39), 3rd year (M=151, SD=45 . there is significance difference in this
dimension by year because the sig value is 0,461. and it is greater than 0,05.

c. thesis score by assignment types.

ANOVA
Thesis score

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 4893,023 2 2446,511 1,514 ,230

Within Groups 77575,487 48 1616,156
Total 82468,510 50

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Thesis score
Tukey HSD

Mean 95% Confidence Interval

(I) Assignment (J) Assignment Difference (I-
types types J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Individual Group 11,185 14,959 ,736 -24,99 47,36

Individual + Group -11,333 16,412 ,770 -51,03 28,36

Group Individual -11,185 14,959 ,736 -47,36 24,99
Individual + Group -22,518 13,035 ,205 -54,04 9,01
Individual + Group Individual 11,333 16,412 ,770 -28,36 51,03

Group 22,518 13,035 ,205 -9,01 54,04

Descriptives
Thesis score

95% Confidence Interval

for Mean

Std. Std. Lower Upper

N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound Minimum Maximum

Individual 10 151,80 20,319 6,425 137,26 166,34 128 190

Group 26 140,62 40,051 7,855 124,44 156,79 78 210
Individual +
15 163,13 49,105 12,679 135,94 190,33 64 224
Group
Total 51 149,43 40,612 5,687 138,01 160,85 64 224

The Anova tests revealed the significant difference on students thesis score and assignment
type.(F[2,48])=1,514, p=0,230. The result from the Tukey post hoc analysis showed that
students with individual + Group reported get highest score in thesis score (M=163, SD=49)
compare to individual type (M=151, SD=20), Group (M=140, SD=40) . there is significance
difference in this dimension by assignment type because the sig value is 0,230. and it is
greater than 0,05.

d. Students stress by gender

Group Statistics

Gender N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Students stress in Statistics female seller 22 58,36 10,154 2,165

class male seller 29 59,55 9,195 1,707
 Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test
for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95%
Confidence

Sig. Interval of the

(2- Mean Std. Error Difference

F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper

Students Equal
-,43
stress in variances ,702 ,406 49 ,664 -1,188 2,719 -6,652 4,276
7
Statistics assumed
class Equal
-,43
variances not 42,824 ,669 -1,188 2,757 -6,749 4,373
1
assumed

From the table it can be seen that the sig value is 0,406 and it is greater than 0,05. It means
the data is homogen. t value for equal variance assumed is 0,437 and t value for equal
variances not assumed is 0,431. And degree of freedom (df) is 49. Sig 2-tailed are 0,664 and
0,669 The interval confidence is between -6,652 (lower) and 4,276( upper).

e. students stress by assignment types

ANOVA
Students stress in Statistics class

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 152,827 2 76,413 ,834 ,440

Within Groups 4397,095 48 91,606
Total 4549,922 50

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Students stress in Statistics class
Tukey HSD

Mean 95% Confidence Interval

(I) Assignment (J) Assignment Difference (I-
types types J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Individual Group -1,638 3,561 ,890 -10,25 6,97

Individual + Group 2,367 3,907 ,818 -7,08 11,82

Group Individual 1,638 3,561 ,890 -6,97 10,25
Individual + Group 4,005 3,103 ,407 -3,50 11,51
Individual + Group Individual -2,367 3,907 ,818 -11,82 7,08

Group -4,005 3,103 ,407 -11,51 3,50

Descriptives
Students stress in Statistics class

95% Confidence Interval

for Mean

Std. Std. Lower Upper

N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound Minimum Maximum

Individual 10 58,90 5,195 1,643 55,18 62,62 50 65

Group 26 60,54 9,888 1,939 56,54 64,53 45 78
Individual +
15 56,53 11,051 2,853 50,41 62,65 42 78
Group
Total 51 59,04 9,539 1,336 56,36 61,72 42 78

The Anova tests revealed the significant difference on students stress and assignment type.
(F[2,48])=0,834 p=0,440. The result from the Tukey post hoc analysis showed that students
with Group reported get highest score in students stress (M=60, SD=9) compare to individual
type (M=59, SD=5), Individual +Group (M=56, SD=11) . there is significance difference in
this dimension by assignment type because the sig value is 0,440. and it is greater than 0,05.

5. Check whether these score have correlation

a. students thesis score and stress level .

 Correlations

Students stress
in Statistics
Thesis score class

Thesis score Pearson Correlation 1 -,942**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000

N 51 51
Students stress in Statistics Pearson Correlation -,942** 1
class Sig. (2-tailed) ,000

N 51 51

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

From the table it can be seen that correlation or r= -942 and the significan 2-tailed=0,000.
And P=0,05. It means that there is strong positive correlation between Thesis score and
students stess in statistic.

b. Students stress and anxiety level

Correlations

Students stress Students anxiety

in Statistics in Statistics
class class

Students stress in Statistics Pearson Correlation 1 ,993**

class Sig. (2-tailed) ,000

N 51 51
Students anxiety in Statistics Pearson Correlation ,993 **
1
class Sig. (2-tailed) ,000

N 51 51

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

From the table it can be seen that correlation or r= 993 and the significan 2-tailed=0,000. And
P=0,05. It means that there is strong correlation between students stress and students anxiety
level.

c. students anxiety and age non categorical

Correlations
 Students anxiety
in Statistics
class Your Age

Students anxiety in Statistics Pearson Correlation 1 -,031

class Sig. (2-tailed) ,831

N 51 51
Your Age Pearson Correlation -,031 1

Sig. (2-tailed) ,831

N 51 51

If sig is greater than 0,05 means null hypothesis is accepted. Sig =0,831 and greater than
0,05. It means there is no correlation between students anxiety in statistic with the age.

d. Students anxiety and academic writing score

Correlations

Students anxiety Scores on

in Statistics Academic
class Writing

Students anxiety in Statistics Pearson Correlation 1 ,312*

class Sig. (2-tailed) ,026

N 51 51
Scores on Academic Writing Pearson Correlation ,312 *
1

Sig. (2-tailed) ,026

N 51 51

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

If sig is greater than 0,05 means null hypothesis is accepted. Sig =0,026 and greater than
0,05. It means there is no correlation between students anxiety in statistic with score on
academic writing.

6. Regression

a. thesis score and stress level

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 ,942 a
,887 ,885 13,794
a. Predictors: (Constant), Students stress in Statistics class

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 73144,567 1 73144,567 384,396 ,000b

Residual 9323,943 49 190,285

Total 82468,510 50

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

b. Predictors: (Constant), Students stress in Statistics class
From Anova table aboves shows that F=384 and sig value or P=0,000. Sig number is less
than 0,05. It means that students stress does not influence the Thesis score.

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 386,148 12,227 31,581 ,000

Students stress in Statistics

-4,009 ,205 -,942 -19,606 ,000
class

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

In coefficient table it can be get the formula of linear regression Y=a+bX. The value of a =
386,148 and b= -4,009 so the formula of equation lineal regression is Y= 363,148 -4,009X. If
there is 1 decrease of score, the score will decrease 4,009.

ANOVA Table

Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.

Thesis score * Between (Combined) 77570,510 23 3372,631 18,591 ,000

Students stress in Groups Linearity 73144,567 1 73144,567 403,206 ,000
Statistics class Deviation from
4425,943 22 201,179 1,109 ,395
Linearity

Within Groups 4898,000 27 181,407

Total 82468,510 50
From the table above, the coefficient of linearity is F =1,109 and sig =0,395. Sig number is
greater than 0,05. It means those variable is linear.

b. Thesis score and academic writing score

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 ,290a ,084 ,066 39,260

a. Predictors: (Constant), Scores on Academic Writing

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 6943,678 1 6943,678 4,505 ,039b

Residual 75524,832 49 1541,323

Total 82468,510 50

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

b. Predictors: (Constant), Scores on Academic Writing

From Anova table aboves shows that F=4,505 and sig value or P=0,039. Sig number is less
greater 0,05. It means that students Thesis score can be predicted from academic writing..

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 198,266 23,656 8,381 ,000

Scores on Academic Writing -,897 ,423 -,290 -2,123 ,039

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

In coefficient table it can be get the formula of linear regression Y=a+bX. The value of a =
198,266 and b= -0,897 so the formula of equation lineal regression is Y= 198,266 -0,897X. If
there is 1 decrease of score, the score will decrease 0,897.

ANOVA Table

Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.

Thesis score * Between (Combined) 51604,510 29 1779,466 1,211 ,329

Scores on Academic Groups Linearity 6943,678 1 6943,678 4,725 ,041
Writing Deviation from
44660,832 28 1595,030 1,085 ,429
Linearity

Within Groups 30864,000 21 1469,714

Total 82468,510 50

From the table above, the coefficient of linearity is F =1,085 and sig =0,429. Sig number is
greater than 0,05. It means those variable is linear.

c. Thesis score predicted from research method score

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 ,176 a
,031 ,011 40,382

a. Predictors: (Constant), Research method score

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 2562,533 1 2562,533 1,571 ,216b

Residual 79905,977 49 1630,734

Total 82468,510 50
a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score
b. Predictors: (Constant), Research method score

From Anova table aboves shows that F=1,571 and sig value or P=0,216. Sig number is
greater 0,05. It means that students Thesis score can be predicted from research method
score

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 197,571 38,816 5,090 ,000

Research method score -,685 ,546 -,176 -1,254 ,216

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

In coefficient table it can be get the formula of linear regression Y=a+bX. The value of a =
197,571 and b= -0,685 so the formula of equation lineal regression is Y= 197,571 -0,685X. If
there is 1 decrease of score, the score will decrease 0,685.

ANOVA Table

Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.

Thesis score * Between (Combined) 39650,510 21 1888,120 1,279 ,266

Research method Groups Linearity 2562,533 1 2562,533 1,736 ,198
score Deviation from
37087,977 20 1854,399 1,256 ,282
Linearity

Within Groups 42818,000 29 1476,483

Total 82468,510 50

From the table above, the coefficient of linearity is F =1,256 and sig =0,282. Sig number is
greater than 0,05. It means those variable is linear.

d. Thesis score predicted from students anxiety

Model Summary
 Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 ,933 a
,871 ,868 14,739

a. Predictors: (Constant), Students anxiety in Statistics class

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 71823,347 1 71823,347 330,605 ,000b

Residual 10645,163 49 217,248

Total 82468,510 50

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

b. Predictors: (Constant), Students anxiety in Statistics class

From Anova table aboves shows that F=330,605 and sig value or P=0,000. Sig number is
less 0,05. It means that students Thesis score can not be predicted from students anxiety.

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 391,398 13,467 29,064 ,000

Students anxiety in Statistics

-3,908 ,215 -,933 -18,183 ,000
class

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

In coefficient table it can be get the formula of linear regression Y=a+bX. The value of a =
391,398 and b= -3,908 so the formula of equation lineal regression is Y= 391,398 -3,908X. If
there is 1 decrease of score, the score will decrease 3,908.

ANOVA Table

Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Thesis score * Between (Combined) 76640,426 26 2947,709 12,139 ,000
Students anxiety in Groups Linearity 71823,347 1 71823,347 295,768 ,000
Statistics class Deviation from
4817,080 25 192,683 ,793 ,715
Linearity

Within Groups 5828,083 24 242,837

Total 82468,510 50

From the table above, the coefficient of linearity is F =0,793 and sig =0,715. Sig number is
greater than 0,05. It means those variable is linear.

e. Thesis score predicted from age

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 ,040a
,002 -,019 40,991

a. Predictors: (Constant), Your Age

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 134,439 1 134,439 ,080 ,778b

Residual 82334,071 49 1680,287

Total 82468,510 50

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

b. Predictors: (Constant), Your Age

From Anova table aboves shows that F=0,080 and sig value or P=0,778. Sig number is
greater than 0,05. It means that students Thesis score can be predicted from students age
 Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 139,054 37,134 3,745 ,000

Your Age ,396 1,402 ,040 ,283 ,778

a. Dependent Variable: Thesis score

In coefficient table it can be get the formula of linear regression Y=a+bX. The value of a =
139,054 and b= 0,396 so the formula of equation lineal regression is Y= 139,054 +0,396X. If
there is 1 increase of score, the score will increase 0,396.

ANOVA Table

Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.

Thesis score * Your Between (Combined) 17032,976 14 1216,641 ,669 ,788

Age Groups Linearity 134,439 1 134,439 ,074 ,787

Deviation from
16898,537 13 1299,887 ,715 ,737
Linearity

Within Groups 65435,533 36 1817,654

Total 82468,510 50

From the table above, the coefficient of linearity is F =0,715 and sig =0,737. Sig number is
greater than 0,05. It means those variable is linear.