Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.6 Public Int Law by Mr. Vivek Wilson
5.6 Public Int Law by Mr. Vivek Wilson
COURSE OUTLINE
OF
B.A.LL.B. (HONS.)
SEMESTER-: V
BATCH-: 2020-25
FACULTY-:
VIVEK WILSON (Principal faculty)
SUGAT TAJANE ( Teaching assistant)
1|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
S.No. Contents
Pg. No.
1.
3
Objectives of the course
2.
Proposed teaching schedule 3
3.
Detailed course-outline 4
4.
Prescribed/Recommended readings 6
5.
Teaching methodology 9
6.
Evaluation pattern 9
7.
Tentative Dates for Submission of Project, Mid-Term 10
and End Term Examination
8.
Important Instruction to the students 10
2|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
The course aims to present a panorama of public international law, which covers
principles and rules that govern the relations between States and the latter’s
interactions with other international actors. The course is designed to give students
a global understanding of the rules governing international relations and, ultimately,
provide them with practical skills in legal reasoning and arguing, research and
writing on international issues. The course will start with an introduction to the
international legal order, including a presentation of the specificities of international
law as compared to domestic law. It will then focus on core areas of public
international law which involve the following questions: Who are the actors in the
international legal system and to whom does international law apply? How is
international law created and where can it be found? What are the fundamental
principles of public international law, besides the multitude of international rules,
with a special focus on one of them, namely the prohibition of the use of force?
Finally, in case of breaches of international rules, how does international law react
to such breaches?
MODULE
MODULE NO. OF
CLASSES
Nature and Development of International Law
1 2
Sources of International Law
2 2
Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
3 2
Subjects of International Law
4 2
5 Recognition of States 6
State Territory and State Succession
6 6
State Jurisdiction
7 6
State Immunities and Privileges
8 6
Law of State Responsibility
9 6
Law of Treaties
10 6
Settlement of Disputes 6
11
International Human Rights Law 5
12
International Institutions 5
13
3|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
4|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
5|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
PRESCRIBED READINGs
1. Oppeniheim, International Law, Biblio Bazaar, LIC, 2010
2. James Crawford Brownlie, Principles of International Law,
Oxford University Press, 2013
3. Starke, Introduction to International Law , Oxford University
Press, 2013
4. Shaw, International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2008 (6th
Edn)
5. Boyle & C. Chinkin, The Making of International Law,
Foundations of Public International Law, Oxford University Press,
2007
6. R. P. Dhokalia, The Codification of Public International Law,
United Kingdom: Manchester University Press, 1970
7. Mark Villiger, “The Factual Framework: Codification in Past and
Present”, in Customary International Law and Treaties, Mark
Villger, pp.63-113, The Netherlands: MartinusNijhoff, 1985
8. S.K. Kapoor, International Law, Human Rights, Central Law
Agency, 2009
9. Brownlie, International Law and the Use of Force by States,
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991
10. H.O. Agarwal, International Law & Human Rights, Central Law
Agency 1st Ed. (Rep) 2014
6|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
RECOMMENDED READINGS
1. D. Harris & Sandesh Sivakumaran, Cases and Materials on International Law (8th
ed., 2015)
2. Robert Jennings and Arthur Watts (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law [Vol. I –
Peace] (9th ed., 2008)
3. James Crawford, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th ed., 2013)
7. S. K. Verma, An introduction to Public International Law (2nd ed. 2012) • Kaul, J.L.
& A. Jha, Shifting Horizons of Public International Law, (1st ed. 2018)
PRESCRIBED TREATIES
7|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
CASE READINGS
1. Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations Case.
ICJ Rep.1949,p.174
2. Lotus Case (France v. Turkey), PCIJ, Ser. A, No. 10 (1927)
3.
1. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, ICJ Rep. 1969, p. 3
2. Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Merits) (Portugal v. India), ICJ Rep. 1960, p.
6
3. Asylum Case (Columbia v. Peru), ICJ Rep. 1950, p. 266
4. Advisory Opinion of ICJ on the Effect of Awards of Compensation made by the
United Nations Administrative Tribunal , 1954 International Law Reports 310
5. Island of Palmas Case (Netherlands v. United States) (1928) Permanent Court of
Arbitration, 2 R.I.A.A. 829
6. Temple of Preah Vihear Case (Merits) (Cambodia v. Thailand), ICJ Reports 1962,
8|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
p.6
7. Advisory Opinion of ICJ on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,
35 International Legal Materials 809 (1996)
8. In Re Berubari Union No. (I), AIR 1960 SC 845 : (1960) 3 SCR 250
9. Ram Kishore Sen v. Union of India (1966) 1 SCR 430 : AIR 1966 SC 644
10. Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin, AIR 1980 SC 470 (1980) 2 SCC 360
11. Gramophone Company of India Ltd. v. Birendra Bahadur Pandey, AIR 1984 SC 667:
(1984) 2 SCC 534
12. Union of India v. Sukumar Sengupta, AIR 1990 SC 1692 : 1990 Supp. SCC 545
13. Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996) 5 SCC 647
14. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011 : (1997) 6 SCC 241
15. Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retd.) v.Union of India (2017) 6 SCC 235
16. Corfu Channel Case, ICJ Rep. 1949, p. 4
17. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co. Ltd. Case, ICJ Rep.1964, p. 6
18. Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United
States of America v. Iran), ICJ Rep.1980, p.3
19. Nicaragua Case (Nicaragua v. USA) ICJ Rep.1986, p. 14
20. La Grand Case (Germany v. United States of America) ICJ Reports 2001, p. 466
21. Certain Activities Carried Out By Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v
Nicaragua) ICJ Reports 2018
22. Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway), ICJ Rep. 1951, p.
116
23. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, ICJ Rep. 1969, p. 3
24. Libya v. Tunisia Continental Shelf Case, ICJ Rep. 1982, p. 17
25. Republic of Italy v. Union of India (2013) 4 SCC 721
26. In the Matter of the Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration (between the
People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Republic of India),PCA, 2014.
27. Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
ICJ Rep. 2002, p.3
28. Abu Salem v. State of Maharashtra (2011) SCC 214
29. Arrest and Restoration of Savarkar (France/Great Britain, 1911)
30. Gaurav Jain v. Union of Inida AIR 1997 SC 3021
31. Independent Thought v Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 800
32. Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of
Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v Russian Federation), ICJ Rep. (2019)
33. The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon (1812) 7 Cranch 116
34. Case Concerning U.S. Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, ICJ Rep. 1980, p. 3
35. Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening) ICJ
Rep. (2008)
36. Jadhav Case (India v Pakistan), ICJ Rep. (2019)
9|P a ge
SEMESTER VI COURSE-: CPC AND LIMITATION LAW FACULTY VIVEK WILSON
Evaluation: Marks
Total
100
The Mid Semester Examination and End Term Examination dates are as per the
schedule. The dates for project submission will be issued by the Academic Committee.
3. The faculty-member may not necessarily follow the sequence of the modules. The
sequence will be in accordance to the need of the subject and the teaching.
Flexibility is required to do justice to the subject.
Active and positive class participation is mandatory. Maintaining the dignity and
decorum of the class is equally mandatory. Once the class is begun the students are
not allowed to enter the classroom.
4. The students are required to come to the class with necessary home work, which will
be beneficial for positive participation in learning – teaching process.
10 | P a g e