MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: REYMART KHEY L. ESPARTERO Name of Rater: BERNIE G. LOQUINARIO

Position: TEACHER II Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: ANTIQUE Date of Review:
Rating Period:
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher III) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Knowledge of content within and (COT) rating sheet/inter-
Services and Pedagogy across curriculum observer agreement form
teaching areas.

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 2. Ensured the Any supplementary material (in Quality
Education positive use of ICT to print/digital format) made by the
Services facilitate the ratee and used in the lesson
teaching and learning delivery:
process" 1. Activity sheet/s
2. One lesson from a locally
crafted self-learning module
(SLM)
3. Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
Lesson
4. Exemplars, and the likes)
5. Video lesson
6. Audio lesson
7. Other learning materials in
print/digital format
(please specify and
provide annotations)
Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher III) Review
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic "3. Applied a Any supplementary material (in Quality
Education range of print/digital format) made by the
Services teaching ratee and used in the lesson
strategies to delivery:
develop 1. Activity sheet/s
critical and 2. One lesson from a locally
creative crafted self-learning module
thinking, as (SLM)
well as other 3. Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
higher-order DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
thinking Lesson
skills" 4. Exemplars, and the likes)
5. Video lesson
6. Audio lesson
7. Other learning materials in
print/digital format
(please specify and
provide annotations)
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning "4. Established 22.5% Any supplementary material (in Quality
Education Environment a learner centered print/digital format) made by the
Services and Diversity culture by ratee and used in the lesson
of Learners using teaching delivery:
strategies that 1. Activity sheet/s
respond to 2. One lesson from a locally
their linguistic, crafted self-learning module
cultural, (SLM)
socioeconomic 3. Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
and religious DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
backgrounds" Lesson
4. Exemplars, and the likes)
5. Video lesson
6. Audio lesson
7. Other learning materials in
print/digital format
(please specify and
provide annotations)

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher III) Review
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic "5. Planned and 1. COT rating sheet/inter- Quality
Education delivered teaching observer agreement form
Services strategies that are
responsive to the
special educational
needs of learners in
difficult
circumstances*,
including: geographic
isolation; chronic
illness; displacement
due to armed conflict,
urban resettlement or
disasters; child
abuse and child
labor practices"
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic "6. Used 1. Evidence that highlights Quality
Education strategies for providing accurate and
Services providing constructive feedback to
timely, accurate improve learner
and performance and that shows
constructive timeliness of feedback given
feedback to to any of the following ∙
improve learner activity sheet ∙ performance
performance" task ∙ portfolio ∙ quiz or test ∙
self-learning module
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum "7. Selected, 22.5% 1. COT rating sheet/inter- Quality
Education and Planning developed,organized observer agreement form
Services and usedappropriate
teaching andlearning
resources,including
ICT,to address
learning goals"
Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher III) Review
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
"8. Set  One lesson plan (e.g., DLP, Quality
achievable and DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
appropriate Lesson Exemplars, and the
learning likes) or one lesson from a
outcomes that self-learning module
are aligned prepared by the ratee with
with learning achievable and appropriate
competencies" learning outcomes that are
aligned with the learning
competencies as shown in
any of the following:
 Lecture/discussion
 Activity/activity sheet ∙
Performance task
 Rubric for assessing
performance using
criteria that
appropriately
describe the target
output
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment "9. Built 1. Proof of participation in any Quality
Education and Reporting relationships activity for improved access
Services with parents/ to education such as, but not
guardians limited to the ff. activities
and the wider
school  Distribution of learning
community to materials to
facilitate learners/parents (e.g.,
involvement receipt form/monitoring
in the form during distribution of
educative learning materials, etc.)
process"  Brigada Eskwela (e.g.,
commitment form to
stakeholders, developed
advocacy materials,
certificate of participation
that involves
parents’/stakeholders’
engagement signed by
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher III) Review
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
the school head, etc.)
 Home visitation (e.g.,
home visitation form,
etc.)
 Others (please specify
and provide annotations)

2. Parent-teacher log or proof of

other stakeholders meeting (e.g.,
one-on-one parent-teacher-
learner conference log;
attendance sheet with minutes of
online or face-to-face meeting;
proof of involvement in the
learners’/parents’ orientation,
etc.)

3. Any form of communication to

parents/stakeholders (e.g., notice
of meeting; screenshot of
chat/text message/
communication with
parent/guardian [name or any
identifier removed]; digital/
printed copy of Learner
Enrollment Survey Form signed
by the ICT Coordinator/Focal
person and School Head)

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic "10. Participated 22.5%  Certificate of completion in a Quality
Education in professional course/training
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher III) Review
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Services networks to  Certificate of participation in
share a webinar, retooling,
knowledge and upskilling, and other training/
to enhance seminar/ workshop with proof
practice of implementation
"  Certificate of recognition/
speakership in a webinar,
retooling, upskilling, and
other training/ seminar/
workshop
 Any proof of participation to a
benchmarking activity
 Any proof of participation in
school LAC sessions
(online/face-to-face) certified
by the LAC Coordinator
 Others (please specify and
provide annotations)

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 11. Developed a Main MOV Quality
Education personal  Individual Performance and
Services improvement Commitment Review Form-
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher III) Review
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
plan based on Development Plan (IPCRF-DP)
reflection of
one’s practice Supporting MOV
and ongoing  Reflection of one’s practice
professional during on LAC sessions with
learning" proof of attendance
 Reflection/Personal Notes on
Coaching and Mentoring and/or
Mid- year Review
 Personal notes journal on
division/school-led INSET with
proof of attendance
 Certificate of enrolment/
registration form/class card in
graduate/post-graduate
school/online courses
 Any learning material
highlighting the improvement
done based onaccomplished
“reflection” section
 Others (please specify and
provide annotations)

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher III) Review
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 5. Plus Factor "12. Performed 10% Proof of: Quality
Education various related
Services works/activities  committee involvement
that contribute  advisorship of co-curricular
to the teaching activities
learning  involvement as
process module/learning material
writer
 involvement as
module/learning material
validator
 participation in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV-/radio-based instruction
 book or journal authorship/
contributorship
 coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
 coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
 mentoring pre-service
teachers
 participation in demonstration
teaching
 participation as research
presenter in a
forum/conference
Efficiency
Timeliness

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

BERNIE G. LOQUINARIO REYMART KHEY L. ESPARTERO MARILYN D. SORILLA

Head Teacher III Teacher II Principal II