This document analyzes options for reconstructing the gas gathering and compression system for fields feeding the central gas gathering point at CPF Solokha. There are three main options considered: 1) decentralizing the system with a new BCS installed at GOSP field; 2) increasing gas extraction from deposits by lowering pressure limits and installing a new compressor stage at BCS Solokha; 3) continuing with the current centralized system but optimizing pressures. A technical and economic analysis is provided comparing additional production, investments, costs and financial metrics for each option. Option 2 is identified as having the highest additional production, net profit, and internal rate of return at 19.6%, making it the recommended option.
This document analyzes options for reconstructing the gas gathering and compression system for fields feeding the central gas gathering point at CPF Solokha. There are three main options considered: 1) decentralizing the system with a new BCS installed at GOSP field; 2) increasing gas extraction from deposits by lowering pressure limits and installing a new compressor stage at BCS Solokha; 3) continuing with the current centralized system but optimizing pressures. A technical and economic analysis is provided comparing additional production, investments, costs and financial metrics for each option. Option 2 is identified as having the highest additional production, net profit, and internal rate of return at 19.6%, making it the recommended option.
This document analyzes options for reconstructing the gas gathering and compression system for fields feeding the central gas gathering point at CPF Solokha. There are three main options considered: 1) decentralizing the system with a new BCS installed at GOSP field; 2) increasing gas extraction from deposits by lowering pressure limits and installing a new compressor stage at BCS Solokha; 3) continuing with the current centralized system but optimizing pressures. A technical and economic analysis is provided comparing additional production, investments, costs and financial metrics for each option. Option 2 is identified as having the highest additional production, net profit, and internal rate of return at 19.6%, making it the recommended option.
(Master degree student, O-61-V) • General characteristics of the work: the work·determines the optimal scheme of gas gathering and compressing: a centralized or decentralized scheme. • The object of_stucty: fields gathering system, which feed gas to the central gas gathering point the CPF solokha. • Work goal: choice of reconstruction BCS Solokha and gas gathering system of deposits optimal variant, which gas is supplied to the compression among 2 main options and additional option based on the increase of gas extraction from deposits: • - Option 1 - decentralization of the gas gathering and compression scheme with the BCS installation at the field GOSP; • - Option 2 - increase of gas extraction from deposits based on the- maximum allowable-depression on a-layer and creation of the O-stage gas compression Solar (Centaur 40) and the gas supply from Kotelevskaya group of fields on the input of existing BOS. Impact on the well head pressure The actual approximate volume of gas which remains in the reservoir at different operating pressures Schematic diagram of work CPF Solokha as at I quarter. 2016 Schematic diagram of gas gathering process at CPF Solokha and gas transmission by MP DKKR - Summary amount of pressure losses in the gas gathering system under study fields Represantation of options • The basic option- the development of fields with help available at the time of works execution technological capacities taking into account the change in the gas flow direction from the northern group of fields and obtaining the working pressure reserve by reducing the hydraulic resistance if gas gathering system; Option 1 - The centralization of gas gathering and gas compression scheme with the installation of BCS at the GOSP; Option 2 - increase of gas extraction from deposits considering maximum allowable depression on a layer and reconstruction of BCS solokha: with equipping 0-score gas compression stage by GTCC solar (Cetaur 40) and the gas supply from kotelevskaya group of fields on input of current BCS. Justification of minimum allowable pressure at the well head Fuel gas consumption The summary of technical and economic indicators of the options under consideration for reconstruction Solohovskaya BCS Indicators Option B-2 Option 1 Option 2 Additional production – of gas, million m3. 377.3 304.7 389.8 - of condensate, ths. tones 7.235 17.183 41.456 - of LPG, ths. tones -25.811 2.485 73.591 The fuel gas, million m3 -94.1 102.6 139.2 Gas consumption on the extraction of natural gas liquids, million m3. -15.7 1.5 44.9 Marketable gas, million m3. 487.1 200.5 205.7 Additional capital investments, ths. UAH 78 373.2 254 498.0 622 558.9 Additional operating expenses, ths. UAH. 670 638.8 918 861.3 1 270 067.0 including current expenses 25 201.7 58 264.3 35 904.9 depreciation 78 373.2 254 498.0 622 558.9 fee for subsoil and excise 567 063.9 488 638.4 665 286.0 Cost price: - of gas, UAH/ths. m3 1 351.90 4 071.7 4 171.5 - of condensate, UAH/ton 4 049.47 5 673.7 5 353.8 of LPG,UAH/ton 664.40 1 964.7 2 582.1 Net profit, ths. UAH 1 157 503.9 163 575.4 847 201.0 Free cash flow, ths. UAH 1 157 503.9 163 575.4 847 201.0 Accumulated reduced cash flow, ths. UAH 342 964.3 -75 843.0 72 803.6 Internal rate of return 100.9% 7.0% 19.6% Profitability index, the share of un. 6.1 0.6 1.2 Payback period, years 3 not occur 10 Profitability, % 172.6 17.8 66.7 Payments to the budget, ths. UAH 1 237 595.9 781 036.7 1 311 904.8 Thank you