CAMBRIDGE IELTS SERIES

IELTS WRTING TASK 2

Writing Task 2
It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or

music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to

become a good sports person or musician.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experiene.

Write at least 250 words.

1. Phân tích câu hỏi

Loại câu hỏi

 Discussion with opinion

 Bạn theo dõi hướng dẫn cách trả lời dạng Discussion ở
đây: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3wwR6tBYU8&t=43s

Gợi ý ý tưởng:

Natural talent ~ Nature:

 Key point 1: having better genes than others

Example: Michael Phelps who win Olympic medals in swimming due to having a wider
arm span

 Key point 2: child geniuses

Example: Mozart was already a gifted pianist giving public performances when he was
only five years old.

Learning ~ Nurture

 Key point 1: training

Example: Tiger Woods exhausting training schedule

 Key point 2: skilled teachers

Example: After working hard with tutor for three years, I rose from being one of the
weakest math students in my class to achieving first place in the final exams.

2. Bài mẫu tham khảo

Bài mẫu tham khảo số 1:

One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether artists and

sportspeople can only be successful if they are born with natural talent or whether talent
can be nurtured.  This essay examines this question from both points of view and then
states my perspective, being that a combination of both is the key to success.

There are people who argue that success can only be achieved by people with natural
talent. The main reason for believing this is that success requires having
better genes than others. One good illustration of this is Michael Phelps who won
Olympic medals in swimming due to having a wider arm span than the average person.
We can also see evidence of natural talent in child prodigies who are geniuses whose
natural talent shows at a young age. For instance, Mozart was already
a gifted pianist giving public performances when he was just five years old.

However, it can also be argued that anyone can achieve success with the
right coaching. A good example of success due to long hours of coaching is Tiger
Woods. He claims that he only becomes the number one golfer in the world due to his
exhausting training schedule.  Moreover, there are those who opine that repetitive
training can make it seem like a person was born with innate talent. Take
leading martial artists, they spend endless hours undertaking guided training
which conditions their reflexes through a process called conditioned learning. This
principle can be applied in other areas making it seem that the person is gifted yet
underpinning their performance is hours of instruction.

In conclusion, I believe that both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I
tend to believe that true success only occurs when both conditions are present.
Consequently, true brilliance requires a good set of genes as well as the right nurturing
of that natural talent and hard work and dedication to one’s field.

Written by ieltsanswers.com

Bài mẫu tham khảo số 2: 

One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether some people are
genetically equipped with what it takes to be a gifted person, such as a skilled musician
or athlete, or that it is possible to acquire such a gift through the conventional methods
of learning and challenging work. In this essay, I am going to shed some light on both
points of view and extend my partial support to the latter view. 

On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that if one is born with
an inherent talent he need not work hard to exhibit one’s skills. The main reason for
believing this is that many of the famous musicians and athletes have shown
remarkable progress and achievements since early age. One good illustration of this is
the famous musician, Mozart, who was effortlessly capable of composing music since
his early childhood. Therefore, it is easy to see why their argument has gained support.

On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued
that innate talents and hard-work are not mutually exclusive. People often have this
opinion because under appropriate circumstances and good preparations, people can
acquire skills that could enable them to excel in a profession or talent such as music or
sport. A second point is that, nowadays, modern behavioral science and research can
analyze the criteria and the factors that lead to success. A particularly good example
here is the Australian swimming national team that has achieved excellent results by
the implementation of scientific evidence to motivate and train swimmers. Thus, it goes
without saying that their viewpoint is credible and realistic.    

In my opinion, both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I tend to believe
that both an innate talent and training are the best combination to achieve admirable
results.