Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study and Evaluate of Electrical Submersible Pump in Gialo Paleocene Reservoir at Gialo Field - Hadidan Et. Al
Study and Evaluate of Electrical Submersible Pump in Gialo Paleocene Reservoir at Gialo Field - Hadidan Et. Al
Presented By:
Nasre Ddin Ali Al-jeder Mahamed Mustafa Fadel
Supervised By:
Eng. Adel El-traki
Chapter 1
Introduction
Chapter 2
Electrical Submersible Centrifugal
Pump
Chapter 3
Failures & Problems of ESP, with
Recommendations for Reducing them
Chapter 4
The Study Area
Chapter 5
ESP Design & Discussion of Results
Chapter 6
Conclusion & Recommendations
Abstract
Objective
Appendix A
Gialo Paleocene Data
Appendix B
Failure Percentage for Each Well
Appendix C
ESP Design Data & Pump
Performance Curves
Dedication
This project is dedicated with all our heart to our beloved
Parents and to our dear brothers and sisters.
Acknowledgments
First of all we would like to thank Allah the Merciful and
Almighty for giving us the support and power to finish this
work.
Abstract …………………………………………………………………. 1
Objective ………………………………………………………………... 3
Chapter 1
Introduction……………………………………..……………………… 5
Chapter 2
Electrical Submersible Centrifugal Pump…………………………... 11
2.1 Introduction ……………………………………...……………… 12
2.2 Classification of Pumps ………………………...…………….... 15
Major Advantages and Disadvantages of Electrical
2.3 Submersible Pump Systems…...………………………….….… 16
2.4 Components of the Submersible Pumping System ……….…. 17
i
2.5.1.2 Bleeder Valve (Drain Valve)………………… 33
2.5.1.3 Shrouded Pumping System…………………... 34
2.5.1.4 Centralizers…………………………………... 35
2.5.1.5 Cable Bands………………………………….. 35
2.5.1.6 Flat Cable Guards……………………………. 35
2.5.1.7 Y-Tool……………………………………….. 35
ii
3.2.4.1 Causes of Pump Intake Failures……………... 47
Recommendations or Practical Precautionary
3.2.4.2
Steps for the Pump Intake Failures………….. 47
3.2.5 Cable Failures…………………………………………... 47
3.2.5.1 Causes of Cable Failures…………………….. 47
Recommendations or Practical Precautionary
3.2.5.2
Steps for the Cable Failures…………………. 48
3.3 ESP Problems…………………………………………………… 49
iii
4.3 Reservoir Description…………………………………………… 65
Chapter 5
ESP Design & Discussion of Results ………………………………... 70
5.1 Introduction……………………………………….……………… 71
5.2 (Pump Application Data, PAD) Software…………………….. 72
6.2 Recommendations………………………………………..……… 88
Reference……………………………………………..………………… 90
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
iv
List of Figures
Chapter 1
Introduction………………………………………………………………. 5
Number of artificial lifts installations throughout the
Figure (1.1) world……………………………………………………. 9
Chapter 2
Electrical Submersible Centrifugal Pump……………………………. 11
Figure (2.1) A typical submersible pumping unit………………….... 13
v
Chapter 3
Failures & Problems of ESP, with
Recommendations for Reducing them……………………………….. 41
Figure (3.1) Desanding system, run below the ESP……………….... 51
Figure (3.2) Advanced gas handler…………………………………. 57
vi
List of Tables
Chapter 5
ESP Design & Discussion of Results……………………………….. 70
Required data for pump design and some information for
Table (5.1)
well E89…………………………………………………... 78
ESP design results for Gialo Paleocene wells after
Table (5.2)
redesigning them…………………………………………. 81
vii
Abstract
This study reviews ESP components, how and where they work, and
the conditions that reduce ESP system run life or cause failure, also lists
briefly problems, with recommendations for reducing these failures and
problems to improve ESP performance, and well and field economics.
Pull & Run Reports for each well of Gialo Paleocene wells have been
reviewed for the period of (Dec. 31, 1995 – Jan. 1, 2004). The following
data was extracted:
2
Objective
This study will aid the engineer, technician, or field man involved
with submersible operations to become more knowledgeable concerning
the causes of equipment failures and will identify the most common
causes of ESP's problems, and introduce the possible recommendations or
practical precautionary steps that should be taken to eliminate these
failures and problems.
The study scope of work has been divided into two phases as follows:
Phase ΙΙ : After collecting all the required data, we will redesign all the
Gialo Paleocene wells by hand, with asking aid from PAD
program, which providing us with all pump performance
curves.
4
1.1 Introduction
Most oil wells in the early stages of their lives flow naturally to the
surface, these are called flowing wells. The basic prerequisite to ensure
flowing production is that the pressure at well bottom be sufficient to
overcome the sum of pressure losses occurring along the flow path to the
surface. When this criterion is not met, the well stops flowing naturally
and dies.
There are two main causes of a well's dying; either the bottomhole
flowing pressure drops to a level at which it is no longer sufficient to
overcome pressure losses in the well, or the flowing pressure losses
become greater than the bottomhole pressure necessary for the well to
produce. The first case happens due to the removal of fluids from the
underground reservoir and entails a gradual decrease in reservoir
pressure. In the second case, mechanical problems (too small tubing size,
downhole restrictions,… etc.) or a change in composition of the flowing
fluid (usually a decrease of gas production) tend to increase the flow
resistance in the well. Surface condition such as separator pressure or
flow line size, also directly impact total pressure losses and can prevent a
well from flowing.
6
injected periodically below the liquid present in the well, and use the
expansion energy of the gas to displace a liquid slug to the surface.
1. Producing characteristics.
Inflow performance.
Liquid production rate.
Water cut.
Gas-liquid ratio. GLR
2. Fluid properties.
Viscosity.µ
Formation volume factor. β
3. Hole characteristics.
Depth.
Size of tubular.
Completion type.
Deviation.
4. Reservoir characteristics.
Depletion drive reservoir.
Water drive reservoir.
Gas cap expansion drive.
5. Long-range recovery plan.
Primary recovery.
Water flood.
7
Gas injection.
Thermal recovery.
Chemical recovery.
6. Surface facilities.
Surface flow lines.
Separator pressure.
7. Location.
Offshore.
Urban.
Spacing considerations.
8. Power sources available.
Electricity.
Natural gas.
9. Operating problems.
Sand.
Paraffin.
Scale.
Corrosion.
Emulsions
Bottom hole temperature.
10. Multiple completions.
11. Operating personnel.
12. Services available.
8
1. Sucker rod pump (beam pumping).
2. Electrical submersible pump ESP.
3. Gas lift.
4. Hydraulic piston pump.
5. Hydraulic jet pump.
6. Plunger lift.
9
This study will identify the most common causes of Electrical
Submersible Pump (ESP) failures and problems, and introduce the
possible Recommendations to overcoming these problems.
10
Electrical Submersible Centrifugal Pump
2.1 Introduction
The first submersible pumping unit was installed in an oil well in
1928 and since that time the concept has proven itself throughout the oil-
producing world.
12
Figure (2.1) A typical submersible pumping unit consists of an electric motor, seal
section, intake section, multi-stage centrifugal pump, electric cable, surface installed
switchboard, junction box, and transformers.
13
In its operating position, the standard down hole equipment is
suspended from discharge tubing and submerged in well fluid.
The electric motor turns at a relatively constant speed and the pump
and the motor are directly coupled with a protector or seal section in
between. Power is transmitted to the subsurface equipment through a
three-conductor electrical cable which is strapped to the tubing on which
the unit is run into the well.
The motor and the pump rotate at 3,475 to 3,500 rpm for 60Hz power
and 2,900 to 2,915 rpm for 50Hz power. The unit is a precision-built
piece of equipment and, under normal operating conditions, can be
expected to give from 1 to 3 years of good operating life with some units
operating over 10 years.
14
The electrical pump is becoming more popular and is presently being
used in a greater percentage of the wells that are eligible artificial lift
candidates. In particular it is well suited for off-shore applications.
In dynamic pumps,
pumps energy is continuously added to the fluid and is
utilized to increase the velocity of the fluid. The velocity difference is
subsequently converted into pressure energy.
15
flows through the impeller, the particles are accelerated; thus, their
kinetic energy increases. This energy is partially converted into potential
energy (pressure or head) in the impeller and in the diffuser.
16
o Corrosion and scale treatment are easy to apply.
17
and flat cable guards). Optional equipment may include (a downhole
pressure sensor to monitor well bore condition, and variable-speed drive).
18
Figure (2.2) An electrical motor
19
Figure (2.3) shows the cross section of one of the seal sections
currently available.
Seal section is a main element in long system run life. The principle
of operation of seal section differs from one manufacture to another. The
main difference in the way that the motor oil is isolated from the well
fluid.
It works by simply keeping the pressure inside the unit same as the
pressure outside the unit.
20
ª
Some submersible pump applications have required that two or
more protectors be bolted in tandem to achieve adequate protection.
The Modular protector eliminates the cost of tandems by combining
multiple protector section in one unit.
The pump intake is used to allow fluid to enter the pump, when the
gas liquid ratio (GLR) greater than can be handle by the pump (grater
than 10 % in generally).
Vortex style gas separators Figure (2.4 B) use a natural vortex action
created by a special inlet configuration, axial flow inducer, propeller,
retention chamber, and discharge crossover. These separators provide
efficiency over broader flow rang than rotary separators.
21
Figure (2.4 A) A rotary gas separator Figure (2.4 B) Vortex gas separator
22
direction outward from the center of the impeller. This motion is caused
by centrifugal force. The other motion moves in a tangential direction to
the outside diameter of the impeller. The result of these two components
is the true direction of flow.
23
Figure (2.5 B) Shows an impeller and diffuser for one stage
24
The flow rate of a submersible centrifugal pump depends on the
following operational parameters;
o Speed of rotation.
o Size of impeller.
o Impeller design.
o Number of stages.
o The total dynamic head against which the pump is
operating, and
o The physical properties of the fluid being pumped.
In a floater pump, the impellers move axially along the shaft. And in
a fixed pump, the impeller is fixed to the shaft and cannot move axially.
In a combination pump, a certain percentage of the stages are floater and
the remaining fixed.
So, we can say that, the centrifugal pumps are divided into three
groups:
9 Radial-flow pumps.
9 Axial-flow pumps.
9 Mixed-flow pumps.
25
well temperatures in excess of 300°F. Flat cable is used from pothead of
the motor to the pump discharge head, and the round cable used from
pump discharge head to junction box.
Joining round and flat cable sections requires splicing of cable ends
with the materials and procedures recommended by the manufacturer.
The power cable is usually connected to the motor with a splice but
special connectors are also available.
26
The motor flat cable is manufactured with a special terminal called a
“pothead”. The function of the pothead is to allow entry of electric power
into the motor while sealing the connection from well fluid entry.
27
Figure (2.7) Shows an electric transformer.
28
Protection against overload, a condition where excessive amperage
flows through the motor, is needed to prevent the burning of the motor
windings.
29
The modem switchboard provided with variable speed drive (VSD),
which will allow altering the frequency and / or voltage at the out put
terminals.
Main switch.
Selector switch.
Fuses.
Potential transformer.
Over load relays.
Under load relays.
Ammeter chart recorder.
Current transformer.
30
1. Provides a vent to the atmosphere for any gases that might
migrate up the cable.
2. Provides for easy access to test points for electrically checking
the down hole equipment.
3. To change the direction of pump rotation.
ª
The junction box should be located at least 15 ft from the
wellhead and should be locked at all times for security reasons.
31
Figure (2.10) Wellhead assembly
32
fluid from setting back into the pump's top impellers when the unit is shut
down.
33
2.5.1.3 Shrouded Pumping System
This system is essentially the same as the typical standard
installation. With a shroud, the unit can be set in or below the perforation
as shown in Figure (2.13). A shroud can serve two purposes:
34
2.5.1.4 Centralizers
Centralizers are used to center the motor and pump for proper
cooling and in same cases to prevent cable damage due to rubbing
centralizers also help prevent damage to anticorrosive coating during
equipment installation.
2.5.1.7 Y-Tool
Is a special tool run with ESP to allow for running bottom hole
pressure survey and production logging tool during the pump operation
downhole.
35
Figure (2.14) Monitoring systems
36
2.5.2.2 Variable-Speed Drive VSD
The variable speed drive (VSD) is a highly sophisticated
switchboard controller. It performs three distinct functions:
37
Figure (2.16) is a summary for basic equipment which described
earlier.
Figure (2.16)
38
ª
However, by using all the equipment described earlier, centrifugal
pumps can be applied with good ''engineered'' selection, and
produced fluids ranging from brine, gassy oil or heavy emulsions can
be produced if accurate complete.
Figure (2.17)
39
2.7 General Instruction in Pulling and Running
ESP
1. Place all unit boxes at the well with red painted ends toward the
wellhead, and allow at least (5/6) fee
feett.
2. Place the reel of cable (spooler machine) (80-100) feet away from
the well.
3. The control switch board should be placed approximately (50-100)
feet the well.
4. The transformer or generator may be placed at any location within
(50-300) feet from the well.
5. Pump technician should be present during pulling and running.
6. Check all material and equipment, remove box covers and take all
information directly from name plates on (motor-pump-gas
separator-protector).
7. The cable wheel should be (25-40) feet above the rig floor.
8. Install (6) bands per joint above pump, followed by (2) bands per
joint, and finally (6) band per joint in the last (300) feet to surface.
9. Run or pull ESP equipment slow and at fixed speed.
10. Avoid cable slipping when no bands are noticed during pulling of
the hole.
11. Spliced of cable must be banded equally at top and bottom.
12. Use mechanical or air banding machines.
13. Cut off bands with cutting tool.
40
Faiilu
Fa urreess & P
Prrob
obllem
emss ooff ESP
ESP,, w
wiith
Recommendattion
Recommenda onss foorr Reduc
Reduciing them.
3.1 Introduction
Electrical submersible pump system has many failures result from
one or combination of factors that Compromise the operation of each
component, these failures will lead to spoil it and decreasing its
Performance, consequently production loss.
42
3.2 Failures of ESP Components
43
11. Electrical system. Low or unbalanced voltage and current can be
detrimental to good submersible operation and will result in
equipment failures.
Initial installation:
Reinstallation:
However, the decision to rerun a motor should also take into account
the prior operating conditions and the age of the motor.
When a unit is pulled (if the motor is rerun) the following
precautions should be taken:
1. Flush and refill the motor.
2. Change out the protector or seal section.
44
3. If there is any doubt as to the pump’s condition, it should be
changed out to avoid burned motor.
45
and bumping pump in reverse rotation two or three times. If this
fails, unit must be pulled to determine and correct fault. Acid may
be spotted in pump if there is no check valve.
3. If there is broken pump shaft, Unit will need to be pulled and
faulty piece of equipment replaced.
4. If there was leakage in check valve, should be changed.
46
3.2.4 Pump intake (or gas separator) failures
3.2.4.1 Causes of pump intake failures
Pump intake may be plugged or locked, due to deposition build up.
That produces little or no fluid.
Change out the pump intake, or clean it. Can sometimes be cleaned
by reverse rotation.
47
3.2.5.2 Recommendations or practical precautionary steps for
the cable failures
Should a well be pulled for any reason, the flat cable by the pump
should be changed before rerunning the equipment.
If it has received proper care, the round cable can usually be rerun.
However, cable being pulled from a gassy well will usually be damaged,
especially in the lower portion. In some cases, the cable can be reversed,
that is, the top portion is run as the bottom portion and reused. In some
cases a portion of the cable should be replaced.
48
3.3 ESP Problems
49
3.3.1.2 Recommendations for the sand production problem
It works by simply Separates out sand in well fluid then catches the
sand in tailpipe “Dustbin”, or drops the sand via tailpipe to below
perforations, to be removed in a later workover
50
Figure (3.1) Shows desanding
system run below the ESP,
dumping separated sand into a
tailpipe.
51
Benefits:
Benefits:
o High system efficiency.
o Simple installation.
o Pumps oils and waters with solids.
o No internal valves to clog or gas lock. And
o Minimal maintenance costs.
3.3.2 Corrosion
Corrosion costs the petroleum industry hundreds of millions of
dollars each year. A large number of possibilities exist to reduce or
minimize these costs, but they require a continuous and diligent material
selection should be an important part of all equipment design,
surveillance, and operations of the past few years and anticipated future
activities.
52
3.3.2.1 Causes of corrosion
Four elements are necessary for corrosion to occur: an anode, a
cathode, electrolyte (water) and a metallic path for electron flow.
53
9 Use corrosion-resistant materials like stainless steel or other
steel alloys and thermoplastic materials are the most
commonly used metals in oil field operation because of their
lower cost, easy of lubrication and strength and prevent
contact between dissimilar materials.
9 Inject inhibitors.
9 Upgrade metallurgy, monel coating. Against H2S attack.
9 Corrosion control through original design.
54
3.3.3.2 Recommendations for the scale problem
Scale deposited slowly may be very hard, dense, and difficult to
remove with acid or other chemical.
55
measured by a downhole sensor or by erratic current fluctuations from
amp chart.
Advanced Gas Handler (AGH) Figure (3.2) improves the overall lift
efficiency of a submergible lift installation by maintaining a higher gas-
liquid ratio in the tubing string.
56
Figure (3.2) Advanced gas handler
57
Benefits:
.
Figure (3.3) Shows the position of Poseidon
Gas Handling
58
3.3.5 Other problems
3.3.5.1 High viscosity and emulsions
Viscosity affects the performance of centrifugal pumps by lowering
the head-capacity curve, reducing the efficiency and making the highest
efficiency occur at a lower flow. Viscous liquids cause hydraulic losses in
the pump, so that at greater viscosities, pumping head and pump
efficiency decrease while required power increase.
59
Cables are available that will operate successfully up to 350 ºF, but
become more costly as the temperature becomes high.
60
The Study Area
4.1 Introduction
The selected area for study is Gialo oil field “Gialo Paleocene” that
located in Sirt Basin. The Sirt Basin is located in the north central part of
Libya. An active subsidence and block faulting as a result of the collapse
of the Sirt Arch in late Early Cretaceous time developed this basin. This
Chapter represents general view about field history and some information
about its reservoir.
62
Concession 59,
Gialo Field
R.S.&A.E.U
63
The Electrical Submergible Pump, ESP was first used for Gialo field
in 1964. Suitable operating conditions for ESP, in terms of moderate
depth, steady flow rates and low gas- oil ratio prevailed in this field. It
proved to be efficient and most profitable, and thus its use progressed to
cover almost all Waha oil company’s fields.
From Figure (4.2) we can see that more than 25 % of ESP change out
is counted as cable Failure. And 25 % as protector failure.
In return, from Figure (4.3) we can see that the effective cause is
corrosion with 68 %.
64
Pump 423 23 %
Motor 414 23 %
Prot. 448 25 %
G. Sep. 76 4%
Cable 465 25 %
Sand 21 9%
Scale 6 3%
Corr. 164 68 %
Fr. Gas 0 0%
Other 48 20%
The reservoir underlying strong water drive, See Figure (4.4), and
has a Net Pay thickness of 2,117 ft, with a datum depth of 5,900 ft. SS.
The production capacity for this reservoir is 18,500 BOPD, although the
total wells drilled in the reservoir are 48 wells. To know the location and
65
the classification of these 48 wells see Figure (4.5) and Figure (4.6)
respectively.
66
Pumping 30 63 %
Recompleted 11 23 %
in Other Res.
ODH 3 6%
OBS 2 4%
Completion 2 4%
67
ESP failure percentage by component and cause for the Paleocene
reservoir wells (during the same period) are also showed in Table (A-4).
This table was plotted in Figure (A-3) and Figure (A-4). The main
failures with this system are cable and protector due to high water cut.
The Water Cut Map as of Feb. 2005 is shown in Figure (4.7).
Avg. WC: 71 %
ª
To know the failure percentage by component and cause for each
well separate see Appendix B.
68
48 wells were pressure-surveyed in May 2005, results are summarized
in Figure (4.8). Average Static Bottom Hole Pressure (SBHP) was
recorded at 2311 psig. The stable reservoir pressure is attributed to the
pressure support provided by the underlying aquifer.
69
ESP Design & Discussion of Results
5.1 Introduction
The pump rate, or discharge rate, is a function of the rotational speed,
the number of stages, the dynamic head acting against an ESP, and the
viscosity of the fluid being pumped. These factors should be considered
when designing an artificial lift system for a specific reservoir and well.
However, for a given pump, there is an optimal design flow rate that
maximizes pump efficiency and run life. For this reason, ESP
manufacturers specify a recommended operating range, see Figure (5.1).
71
Pump-performance curve, Pump manufacturers publish single-stage
pump-performance curves Figure (5.1) that define the optimal operating
range (yellow shaded area) for a given pump speed and fluid viscosity.
The head-capacity curve (blue) shows the amount of lift per stage at a
given flow rate. The horsepower requirements of the pump (red) across a
range of flow capacities are derived from performance testing. The pump
efficiency (black) is calculated from the head, flow capacity, fluid
specific gravity and the horsepower.
ª
In this chapter we are going to redesign an ESP system for all
working Paleocene wells by hand. Reda Pump Performance Curves
for dynamic head, horsepower and efficiency are provided to the
simple software program to help us to select the suitable pump for a
given well condition.
72
1. Firstly, insert the specific gravity (In these curves the
manufacturers normally assumed a specific gravity 1.00 of fresh
water), pump series and the pump type in its places.
73
2. Second step you have to be sure from three things;
a. Whether it is 50 or 60 Hz will establish the speed and output
of the pump.
b. Motor speed, and
c. The number of stages, (normally equal 1.0)
3. As soon as you click the Graph button you will get the pump
performance curve for the selected pump type (DN-1300). To see
the curve very clearly you have to click Zoom button.
Graph
Button
Zoom
Button
Output Data:
Best Point Efficiency (Optimum Pump Rate) 1283 bpd
Nominal Housing Diameter 4.00 inches
Shaft Diameter 0.688 inches
Shaft Cross Section Area 0.371 in 2
Minimum Casing Size 5.500 inches
74
Last face of the curve after clicking Zoom Button;
75
Water Gradient : psi/ft
API : deg.
Pump Seating Depth : ft
PI : bfpd/psi
- Sp. gr (Oil) = ⎛⎜ ⎞
141 . 5
⎟
⎝ 131 . 5 + API ⎠
76
4. Calculate the minimum pump depth, MPD
⎛ Pwf − Pb ⎞
- MPD = Datume – ⎜ ⎟
⎝ LG ⎠
Where;
Pb = Bubble point pressure.
5. The pump selection
The pump selection depends on;
- Desired rate, bfpd and
- Casing size.
6. Minimum number of stages
⎛ TDH ⎞
- Minimum number of stages = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ ft / stage ⎠
Where;
ft/stage = the amount of lift per stage at a given
flow rate, obtained using pump
performance curve for the selected
pump.
- Actual number of stages from special tables refers to each
Reda pumps.
7. Minimum horsepower
- Minimum horsepower = actual number of stages × hp/stage
Where;
hp/stage = from pump performance curve for the
selected pump.
- Actual horsepower from Table C.1
8. Fluid velocity beside the motor, Vf
⎛ q ⎞
- Vf = 1 . 19 × 10
−2
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ IDc
2
− ODm 2
⎠
Where; IDc = Casing inside diameter, inches
77
ODm = Motor outside diameter, inches
9. Voltage drop
- Voltage drop =
⎛ voltage drop ⎞
⎜ ⎟ × pump depth × temperature correcssion factor
⎝ 1000 ⎠
Where;
[Voltage drop /1000 ft] = from Figure C.2
10. Surface voltage, Vs
- Vs = motor voltage + voltage drop
11. Required kilo volt amps, KVA
⎛ Vs × A × 1 . 73 ⎞
- KVA = ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1000 ⎠
ª
Now, let us apply the previous step-by-step procedures on the
first well (E-89), and we will be satisfied to give only the results for
the remaining wells.
Table (5.1) : Required data for pump design and some information for
well E-89
78
1. Calculate the liquid gradient, LG
⎛ 141 . 5 ⎞
- Sp. gr. (Oil) = ⎜ ⎟ = 0 . 830
⎝ 131 . 5 + 39 ⎠
- Oil gradient = 0.830 × 0.433 = 0.3594 psi/ft
- LG = 0.279 × 0.3594 + 0.721 × 0.433 = 0.4124 psi/ft
2. Bottom hole flowing pressure, Pwf
⎛ 3116 ⎞
- Pwf = 2390 − ⎜ ⎟ = 1611 psi
⎝ 4 ⎠
3. Total Dynamic Head, TDH
⎛ 100 ⎞
- Ps = ⎜ ⎟ = 242 ft
⎝ 0 . 4124 ⎠
⎛ 1611 ⎞
- Ld = 6166 − ⎜ ⎟ = 2260 ft
⎝ 0 . 4124 ⎠
⎛ 30 ⎞
- Pf = ⎜ ⎟ × 5850 = 176 ft
⎝ 1000 ⎠
- TDH = 242 + 2260 + 176 = 2678 ft
4. Minimum pump depth, MPD
⎛ 1611 − 927 ⎞
- MPD = 6166 − ⎜ ⎟ = 4507 ft
⎝ 0 . 4124 ⎠
5. Pump selection
- Since our desired rate is 3116 BFPD, than it is required to
use PAD program to select a pump that produced at this
range. Keeping in mind that our casing is 7''. For this well
we will select DN-3100, series 400. Refer to pump
performance curve on the PAD program for DN-3100,
enter the curve with 3116 BFPD and obtain the following;
Head = 18.8 ft/stage
HP = 0.63 hp/stage
Efficiency = 67.8 %
79
6. Minimum number of stages
⎞
- Minimum number of stages = ⎛⎜ 2678 ⎟ = 142 stage
⎝ 18 . 8 ⎠
⎛ 3116 ⎞
- Vf = 1 . 19 × 10
−2
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 1 . 87 ft / sec
⎝ 6 . 366 − 5 . 4
2 2
⎠
9. Voltage drop
⎛ 7 × 5850 × 1 . 23 ⎞
- Voltage drop = ⎜ ⎟ = 50 volt
⎝ 1000 ⎠
10. Surface voltage, Vs
- Vs = 2170 + 50 = 2220 volt
11. KVA
⎛ 2220 × 29 × 1 . 73 ⎞
- KVA = ⎜ ⎟ = 111
⎝ 1000 ⎠
80
Table (5.2) : ESP design results for Gialo Paleocene wells
after redesigning them.
Pump
Minimum Pump
Motor Description
Voltage Drop
Description
Well Name
Depth, ft
TDH, ft
Pump
KVA
Actual HP
Actual
Vf, ft/sec
Model & Vs
Model
Motor
Number
The
of
Curve
Stages
Reading
Series 400 100 HP, 29 A,
147
DN-3100 2170 V, 60 Hz,
E89 2678 4507 Tandem Series 540 3.26 50 2220 111
H=18.8 Single, 16.9 ft
(96+51)
HP=0.63 Length
Series 400 20 HP, 17 A,
DN-450 172 755 V, 60 Hz,
E93 2969 4785 Series 540 0.49 26 781 23
H=17.8 Single Single, 6 ft
HP=0.12 Length
Series 540 70 HP, 45 A,
GN-2500 59 1015 V, 60 Hz,
E192 2347 4171 Series 540 2.58 71 1086 85
H=41.8 Single Single, 12.8 ft
HP=1.22 Length
Series 540 70 HP, 45 A,
GN-2100 61 1015 V, 60Hz,
E197 2320 3857 Series 540 2.27 74 1089 85
H=42 Single Single, 12.8 ft
HP=1.07 Length
Series 540 80 HP, 45 A,
G-2700 59 1160 V, 60 Hz,
E210 2020 3561 Series 540 0.65 75 1235 96
H=42 Single Single, 14.2 ft
HP=1.3 Length
Series 400 40 HP, 20 A,
DN-1000 133 1325 V, 60Hz,
E211 2761 4687 Series 540 0.98 37 1362 47
H=24 Single Single, 8.7 ft
HP=0.28 Length
Series 400 30 HP, 16 A,
DN-1300 73 1215 V, 60 Hz,
E226 1449 3325 Series 540 1.37 29 1244 35
H=20 Single Single, 7.3 ft
HP=0.31 Length
Series 540 80 HP, 45 A,
G-2700 59 1160 V, 60 Hz,
E227 2230 3817 Series 540 2.84 63 1223 95
H=42.8 Single Single, 14.2 ft
HP=1.29 Length
Series 400 100 HP, 29 A,
132
DN-3000 2170 V, 60 Hz,
E256 2273 3979 Tandem Series 540 3.15 53 2223 112
H=18 Single, 16.9 ft
(81+51)
HP=0.63 Length
81
Series 540 40 HP, 20 A,
GN-2100 35 1325 V, 60Hz,
E258 1084 2968 Series 540 2.19 37 1362 47
H=43.5 Single Single, 8.7 ft
HP=1.06 Length
Series 400 20 HP, 17 A,
DN-450 121 755 V, 60 Hz,
E263 2303 2708 Series 540 0.45 22 777 23
H=19.5 Single Single, 6 ft
HP=0.13 Length
Series 400 20 HP, 17 A,
DN-750 95 755 V, 60 Hz,
E269 2035 3531 Series 540 0.78 26 781 23
H=24 Single Single, 6 ft
HP=0.23 Length
Series 540 60 HP, 30 A,
GN-2500 46 1320 V, 60 Hz,
E270 1752 3517 Series 540 2.70 51 1371 71
H=40.2 Single Single, 11.5 ft
HP=1.25 Length
Series 400 50 HP, 22 A,
D-1400 129 1375 V, 60 Hz,
E271 2565 4546 Series 540 1.62 37 1412 54
H=21.5 Single Single, 10.1 ft
HP=0.40 Length
Series 400 40 HP, 20 A,
DN-1750 116 1325 V, 60Hz,
E272 2220 4027 Series 540 1.82 30 1355 47
H=19.2 Single Single, 8.7 ft
HP=0.36 Length
Series 400 60 HP, 30 A,
DN-1300 202 1320 V, 60 Hz,
E283 3876 5867 Series 540 0.30 52 1372 71
H=20.5 Single Single, 11.5 ft
HP=0.30 Length
Series 400 40 HP, 20 A,
D-1400 92 1325 V, 60Hz,
E284 1869 3873 Series 540 0.34 30 1355 47
H=23.5 Single Single, 8.7 ft
HP=0.40 Length
Series 540 80 HP, 45 A,
GN-2500 59 1160 V, 60 Hz,
E285 2069 3891 Series 540 0.60 74 1234 96
H=40.6 Single Single, 14.2 ft
HP=1.24 Length
Series 540 100 HP, 29 A,
GN-2100 86 2170 V, 60 Hz,
E286 3202 4562 Series 540 0.52 52 2222 111
H=41.8 Single Single, 16.9 ft
HP=1.07 Length
Series 400 50 HP, 22 A,
D-1400 129 1375 V, 60 Hz,
E287 2771 4727 Series 540 0.34 38 1413 54
H=23.5 Single Single, 10.1 ft
HP=0.40 Length
Series 400 40 HP, 20 A,
DN-1750 108 1325 V, 60Hz,
E288 2017 3962 Series 540 0.40 37 1362 47
H=19.7 Single Single, 8.7 ft
HP=0.36 Length
82
Series 540 80 HP, 45 A,
G-2700 59 1160 V, 60 Hz,
E290 2311 4072 Series 540 0.64 71 1231 96
H=43 Single Single, 14.2 ft
HP=1.29 Length
Series 400 40 HP, 20 A,
DN-1000 133 1325 V, 60Hz,
E291 2939 4469 Series 540 0.24 38 1363 47
H=22 Single Single, 8.7 ft
HP=0.28 Length
Series 400 30 HP, 16 A,
DN-1300 92 1215 V, 60 Hz,
E300 1713 3669 Series 540 0.30 26 1241 34
H=20.5 Single Single, 7.3 ft
HP=0.31 Length
Series 400 30 HP, 16 A,
DN-1300 73 1215 V, 60 Hz,
E317 1297 3267 Series 540 1.39 26 1241 34
H=19.8 Single Single, 7.3 ft
HP=0.31 Length
83
5.4 Discussion of Results
After studying the ESP design and installation and by comparing the
type of pump with the rate of production of each well, it was found out
that it is advisable to change and redesign the installation of ESP for
almost all wells.
84
6.1 Conclusion
o The run life data gathered from the total runs of 157 units in the 8
year
yearss period (Dec. 31, 1995 – Jun. 1, 2004) indicates the Average
Run Life is 490 day
dayss (1.34 years) for the 330
0 Paleocen
Paleocenee well
wellss.
86
o New Pump Performance Curves were available on PAD softwar
softwaree.
o The calculated fluid velocity around the motor in some wells less
than 1 ft/se
ft/secc.
87
6.2 Recommendations
o The ammeter chart is a very valuable tool for monitoring the well's
88
o The cable type and size should be selected according to the well
environments, such as well depth, bottom hole temperature,
H2S…etc
o For more than half wells, the calculated velocity around the motor
is less than 1.0 ft/sec. that means they are needed to run shroud to
provide the sufficient cooling for the motor.
89
References
] www.bakerhughes.com
_ www.canadianadvanced.com
` www.slb.com
4V Oligocene
Gialo 4V Oligocene “A”
” Sandstone
29 269 21 783 48 26 78
Jakhira
Gialo Jakhira Limestone
21 50 125 1156 41 35 290
Paleocene
Gialo Paleocene Limestone
25 14 927 2485 37 39 682
Lidam
Masrab Lidam Dolomit
17 30 2891 3643 34 41 97
B. Sc. Project Appendix A Gialo Paleocene Data
45 200
40
35
150
30
20
15
50
10
0 0
4 8 2 6 0 4 8 2 6 0 4
n-6 n-6 n-7 n-7 n-8 n-8 n-8 n-9 n-9 n-0 n-0
Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja
1000
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
B. Sc. Project
E8 5
707
E8 9
226
E9 3
392
E1 9
2 499
E1 9
7 298
E2 0
8 757
E2 0
9 375
E2 1
0 477
E2 1
1 524
E2 2
6 815
E2 2
7 477
E2 5
6 555
E2 5
7 626
E2 5
8 415
E2 6
3 833
E2 6
7 848
E2 6
Well Name E2 7
9
846
0 412
E2 7
1 384
E2 7
2
Period; Dec. 31, 1995 – Jan. 1, 2004
316
E2 8
3 550
E2 8
4 902
E2 8
5 824
E2 8
6 627
E2 8
7 451
Figure (A-2): ESP Average Run Life Days for Gialo Paleocene Wells.
E2 8
8 598
E2 9
0 373
E2 9
1 464
E3 0
0 420
E3 1
7 190
Appendix A Gialo Paleocene Data
B. Sc. Project Appendix A Gialo Paleocene Data
Pump 93 19 %
Motor 77 16 %
Prot. 131 28 %
G. Sep. 59 12 %
Cable 120 25 %
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 26 81 %
Fr. Gas 0 0%
Other 6 19 %
B. Sc. Project Appendix A Gialo Paleocene Data
Table (A-3): ESP Run Life Days & Idle Days in Hole.
Period; Dec. 31, 1995 – Jan. 1, 2004
Area: 59 E
Run & Pull Field: Gialo Reservoir: Paleocene
Well Name
Run–Pull
Idle Days
Run Life
in Hole
Average Average
(Days)
(Days)
Dates
No.
14,663
Sum
157
Avg. 490 93
B. Sc. Project Appendix A Gialo Paleocene Data
Corrosion
Protector
Free Gas
Gas Sep.
Motor
Pump
Other
Cable
Scale
Sand
E85 5 4 5 1 5 3
E89 3 2 8 1 9
E93 1 3 2 2 4 1
E192 3 1 3 2 5 1
E197 3 5 8 2 6 1
E208 5 4 6 3 6 2
E209 4 3 7 1 7 1 1
E210 4 3 4 2 4 1
E211 3 2 3 2 3
E226 2 3 3 1 2
E227 4 4 5 3 5 2 1
E256 4 2 5 3 4 1
E257 2 1 3 2
E258 4 5 7 4 6
E263 3 3 2 3 1 1
E267 1 1 1 1
E269 2 2 2 2
E270 4 2 6 4 5
E271 3 5 1 5 3
E272 5 4 7 1 6 2
E283 4 2 4 4 4
E284 4 3 4 3 4
E285 4 3 4 4 4 1
E286 2 2 1
E287 3 3 8 3 7 1 1
E288 2 3 3 1 2 1
E290 7 6 8 4 6 5 1
E291 2 2 4 1 4
E300 1 1
E317 1 1 1 2
Sum 93 77 131 59 120 0 0 26 0 6
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E85
by Component
Pump 5 25 %
Motor 4 20 %
Prot. 5 25 %
G. Sep. 1 5%
Cable 5 25 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 3 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E89
by Component
Pump 3 13 %
Motor 2 9%
Prot. 8 35 %
G. Sep. 1 4%
Cable 9 39 %
Well E93
by Component
Pump 1 8%
Motor 3 25 %
Prot. 2 17 %
G. Sep. 2 17 %
Cable 4 33 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E192
by Component
Pump 3 21 %
Motor 1 7%
Prot. 3 21 %
G. Sep. 2 14 %
Cable 5 37 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E197
by Component
Pump 3 13 %
Motor 5 21 %
Prot. 8 33 %
G. Sep. 2 8%
Cable 6 25 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E208
by Component
Pump 5 21 %
Motor 4 17 %
Prot. 6 24 %
G. Sep. 3 13 %
Cable 6 25 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 2 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E209
by Component
Pump 4 18 %
Motor 3 14 %
Prot. 7 31 %
G. Sep. 1 5%
Cable 7 32 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 50 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 1 50 %
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E210
by Component
Pump 4 23 %
Motor 3 18 %
Prot. 4 23 %
G. Sep. 2 12 %
Cable 4 24 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E211
by Component
Pump 3 24 %
Motor 2 15 %
Prot. 3 23 %
G. Sep. 2 15 %
Cable 3 23 %
Well E226
by Component
Pump 2 18 %
Motor 3 28 %
Prot. 3 27 %
G. Sep. 1 9%
Cable 2 18 %
Well E227
by Component
Pump 4 19 %
Motor 4 19 %
Prot. 5 24 %
G. Sep. 3 14 %
Cable 5 24 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 2 67 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 1 33 %
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E256
by Component
Pump 4 22 %
Motor 2 11 %
Prot. 5 28 %
G. Sep. 3 17 %
Cable 4 22 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E257
by Component
Pump 2 25 %
Motor 1 13 %
Prot. 3 37 %
G. Sep. 2 25 %
Cable 0 0%
Well E258
by Component
Pump 4 15 %
Motor 5 19 %
Prot. 7 28 %
G. Sep. 4 15 %
Cable 6 23 %
Well E263
by Component
Pump 3 25 %
Motor 3 25 %
Prot. 2 17 %
G. Sep. 3 25 %
Cable 1 8%
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 0 0%
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 1 100 %
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E267
by Component
Pump 1 34 %
Motor 1 33 %
Prot. 1 33 %
G. Sep. 0 0%
Cable 0 0%
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 0 0%
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 1 100 %
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E269
by Component
Pump 2 25 %
Motor 2 25 %
Prot. 2 25 %
G. Sep. 0 0%
Cable 2 25 %
Well E270
by Component
Pump 4 19 %
Motor 2 10 %
Prot. 6 28 %
G. Sep. 4 19 %
Cable 5 24 %
Well E271
by Component
Pump 3 21 %
Motor 0 0%
Prot. 5 36 %
G. Sep. 1 7%
Cable 5 36 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 3 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E272
by Component
Pump 5 22 %
Motor 4 17 %
Prot. 7 31 %
G. Sep. 1 4%
Cable 6 26 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 2 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E283
by Component
Pump 2 23 %
Motor 2 11 %
Prot. 4 22 %
G. Sep. 4 22 %
Cable 4 22 %
Well E284
by Component
Pump 4 22 %
Motor 3 17 %
Prot. 4 22 %
G. Sep. 3 17 %
Cable 4 22 %
Well E285
by Component
Pump 4 21 %
Motor 3 16 %
Prot. 4 21 %
G. Sep. 4 21 %
Cable 4 21 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E286
by Component
Pump 2 40 %
Motor 0 0%
Prot. 2 40 %
G. Sep. 0 0%
Cable 1 20 %
Well E287
by Component
Pump 3 13 %
Motor 3 13 %
Prot. 8 32 %
G. Sep. 3 13 %
Cable 7 29 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 50 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 1 50 %
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E288
by Component
Pump 2 18 %
Motor 3 28 %
Prot. 3 27 %
G. Sep. 1 9%
Cable 2 18 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 1 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E290
by Component
Pump 7 23 %
Motor 6 19 %
Prot. 8 26 %
G. Sep. 4 13 %
Cable 6 19 %
by Cause
Sand 0 0%
Scale 0 0%
Corr. 3 100 %
F. Gas 0 0%
Other 0 0%
B. Sc. Project Appendix B Failure Percentage for Each Well
Well E291
by Component
Pump 2 15 %
Motor 2 15 %
Prot. 4 31 %
G. Sep. 1 8%
Cable 4 31 %
Well E300
by Component
Pump 0 0%
Motor 0 0%
Prot. 1 50 %
G. Sep. 0 0%
Cable 1 50 %
Well E317
by Component
Pump 0 0%
Motor 1 20 %
Prot. 1 20 %
G. Sep. 1 20 %
Cable 2 40 %
Well E89
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 868 bbl/d
Water Rate : 2248 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
First Pump Installed Date : May. 17, 1977 Perforation Interval : 6155 ' – 6177 '
Type: G-180 69 Stage 150 HP Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Existing Pump: Three Pumps GN-4000 SBHP : 2390 psi
79 Stage, 18 Stage, 12 Stage 180 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 20,298 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 100 psi
Cum. Water Production : 18,523 Mbbl Water Cut : 72.1 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 5850 '
PI : 4 bfpd/psi
BHT : 185 f
Well E93
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 326 bbl/d
Water Rate : 139 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6217 ' – 6230 '
First Pump Installed Date : Mar. 15, 1977 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: G-110 79 Stage 120 HP SBHP : 2410 psi
Existing Pump: DN-450 172 Stage 30 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 800 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 10,864 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 100 psi
Cum. Water Production : 14,961 Mbbl Water Cut : 30 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 37
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 0.44 bfpd/psi
BHT : 189 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E192
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 988 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1482 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
First Pump Installed Date : Nov. 2, 1992 Perforation Interval : 6222 ' – 6268 '
Type: DN-1750 116 Stage 50 HP Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps GN-4000 46 SBHP : 2147 psi
Stage, 52 Stage 150 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 900 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 10,700 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 120 psi
Cum. Water Production : 6,495 Mbbl W ater Cut : 60 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 40
Pump Seating Depth : 5700 '
PI : 6 bfpd/psi
BHT : 189 f
Well E197
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 277 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1893 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
First Pump Installed Date : Jul. 30, 1978 Perforation Interval : 6184 ' – 6247 '
Type: G-62 83 Stage 100 HP Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps GN-3100 46 SBHP : 2311 psi
Stage, 47 Stage 160 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 770 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 10,612 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 80 psi
Cum. Water Production : 14,606 Mbbl W ater Cut : 87.2 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 4 bfpd/psi
BHT : 188 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E210
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 385 bbl/d
Water Rate : 2362 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD 8.921'' ID
Perforation Interval : 6196 ' – 6211 '
First Pump Installed Date : Jan. 15, 1980 Tubing Size : 2 7/8 ''
Type: D-51 16 Stage 40 HP SBHP : 2243 psi
Existing Pump:GN-4000 100 Stage 180 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 2,800 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 110 psi
Cum. Water Production : 6,532 Mbbl Water Cut : 86 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 35
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 14 bfpd/psi
BHT : 191 f
Well E211
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 300 bbl/d
Water Rate : 637 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
First Pump Installed Date : Oct. 17, 1978 Perforation Interval : 6185' – 6203 '
Type: G-110 79 Stage 150 HP Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps DN-1000 76 SBHP : 2597psi
Stage, 95 Stage 50 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 5,294 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 130 psi
Cum. Water Production : 7,158 Mbbl W ater Cut : 68 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 0.89 bfpd/psi
BHT : 188 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E226
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 212 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1093 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6252 ' – 6264 '
First Pump Installed Date : Nov. 2, 1978 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: D-55 86 Stage 40 HP SBHP : 2550 psi
Existing Pump: GN-2500 83 Stage 120 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 2,128 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 120 psi
Cum. Water Production : 8,172 Mbbl Water Cut : 83.8 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 35
Pump Seating Depth : 5900 '
PI : 3.4 bfpd/psi
BHT : 186 f
Well E227
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 274 bbl/d
Water Rate : 2441 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6176 ' – 6228 '
First Pump Installed Date : Apr. 18, 1980 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: G-62 83 Stage 100 HP SBHP : 2246 psi
Existing Pump: GN-4000 79 Stage 120 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 6,061 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 200 psi
Cum. Water Production : 14,515 Mbbl Water Cut : 89.9 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 34.4
Pump Seating Depth : 5000 '
PI : 9 bfpd/psi
BHT : 200 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E256
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 769 bbl/d
Water Rate : 2243 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
First Pump Installed Date : Oct. 18, 1990 Perforation Interval : 6170' – 6194 '
Type: DN-2000 87 Stage 60 HP Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps GN-4000 100 SBHP : 2016 psi
Stage, 18 Stage 180 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 8,359 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 150 psi
Cum. Water Production : 9,271 Mbbl W ater Cut : 74.5 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39.4
Pump Seating Depth : 6050 '
PI : 17 bfpd/psi
BHT : 197 f
Well E258
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 504 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1595 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6198 ' – 6240 '
First Pump Installed Date : Jan. 22, 1991 Tubing Size : 2 7/8 ''
Type: DN-1300 92 Stage 30 HP SBHP : 2900 psi
Existing Pump: GN-2500 59 Stage 100 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 950 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 5,267 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 70 psi
Cum. Water Production : 7,130 Mbbl Water Cut : 76 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 3.5 bfpd/psi
BHT : 187 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E263
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 253 bbl/d
Water Rate : 181 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6188 ' – 6252 '
First Pump Installed Date : Jun. 11, 1981 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: G-62 83 Stage 100 HP SBHP : 2511 psi
Existing Pump: DN-450 133 Stage 30 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 239 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 3,024 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 80 psi
Cum. Water Production : 10,015 Mbbl Water Cut : 41.7 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39.4
Pump Seating Depth : 5000 '
PI : 0.48 bfpd/psi
BHT : 187 f
Well E267
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 481 bbl/d
Water Rate : 121 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 2255 ' – 2280 '
First Pump Installed Date : May. 11, 1981
Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: D-40 P 91 Stage 40 HP
SBHP : 2310 psi
Existing Pump: DN-450 133 Stage 40 HP
Bubble Point Pressure : 40 psi
Cum. Oil Production : Mbbl
Wellhead Pressure : 20 psi
Cum. Water Production : Mbbl
Water Cut : 20 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 32
Pump Seating Depth : 2000 '
PI : 7.87 bfpd/psi
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E269
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 156 bbl/d
Water Rate : 590 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6222 ' – 6244 '
First Pump Installed Date : Nov. 14, 1981 Tubing Size : 2 7/8 ''
Type: G-62 83 Stage 100 HP SBHP : 2400 psi
Existing Pump: DN-750 178 Stage 50 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 739 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 1,667 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 100 psi
Cum. Water Production : 4,770 Mbbl Water Cut : 79 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 1.4 bfpd/psi
BHT : 184 f
Well E270
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 796 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1781 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6262 ' – 6274'
First Pump Installed Date : Apr. 2, 1991 Tubing Size : 2 7/8 ''
Type: DN-1300 92 Stage 30 HP SBHP : 2536 psi
Existing Pump: GN-2500 83 Stage 22 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 960 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 4,543 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 90 psi
Cum. Water Production : 7,091 Mbbl Water Cut : 69.1 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 35
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 5.866 bfpd/psi
BHT : 183 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E271
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 512 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1040 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6263 ' – 6305 '
First Pump Installed Date : Apr. 4, 1991 Tubing Size : 2 7/8 ''
Type: DN-1300 127 Stage 50 HP SBHP : 2334 psi
Existing Pump: GN-2500 83 Stage 120 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 960 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 3,482 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 90 psi
Cum. Water Production : 5,177 Mbbl Water Cut : 67 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 35
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 2.356 bfpd/psi
BHT : 189 f
Well E272
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 348 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1395 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 ''OD, 6.366 '' ID
First Pump Installed Date : May. 15, 1993 Perforation Interval : 6252 ' – 6264 '
Type: DN-1300 73 Stage 30 HP Tubing Size : 2 7/8 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps GN-4000 79 SBHP : 2360 psi
Stage, 46 Stage 200 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 1,390 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 100 psi
Cum. Water Production : 5,074 Mbbl W ater Cut : 80 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 37
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 3.5 bfpd/psi
BHT : 190 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E283
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 388 bbl/d
Water Rate : 887 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
First Pump Installed Date : Jul. 24, 1987 Perforation Interval : 6244 ' – 6280 '
Type: D-950 95 Stage 30 HP Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps DN-1750 SBHP : 2400 psi
116 Stage, 58 Stage 70 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 950 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 2,538 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 120 psi
Cum. Water Production : 2,562 Mbbl Water Cut : 69.6 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 40
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 0.99 bfpd/psi
BHT : 188 f
Well E284
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 291 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1165 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
Perforation Interval : 6244 ' – 6280 '
First Pump Installed Date : Aug. 26, 1989 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: DN-1000 152 Stage 50 HP SBHP : 2266 psi
Existing Pump: GN-2500 83 Stage 120 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 960 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 1,949 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 100 psi
Cum. Water Production : 2,751 Mbbl Water Cut : 80 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 35
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 4.799 bfpd/psi
BHT : 189 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E285
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 273 bbl/d
Water Rate : 2266 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
Perforation Interval : 6271 ' – 6282 '
First Pump Installed Date : Mar. 5, 1986 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: D-13 133 Stage 30 HP SBHP : 2646 psi
Existing Pump: GN-2500 46 Stage 70 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 845 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 100 psi
Cum. Water Production : 3,634 Mbbl Water Cut : 89.2 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 3.6 bfpd/psi
BHT : 187 f
Well E286
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 239 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1959 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
First Pump Installed Date : Mar. 10, 1987 Perforation Interval : 6247 ' – 6257 '
Type: D-950 76 Stage 30 HP Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps GN-2500 SBHP : 2272 psi
83 Stage, 22 Stage 150 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 739 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 576 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 120 psi
Cum. Water Production : 2,993 Mbbl Water Cut : 89.1 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 37
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 2.7 bfpd/psi
BHT : 185 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E287
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 292 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1169 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
Perforation Interval : 6270 ' – 6280 '
First Pump Installed Date : Apr. 15, 1987 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: DN-450 133 Stage 30 HP SBHP : 2265 psi
Existing Pump:GN-2500 83 Stage 120 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 960 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 990 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 120 psi
Cum. Water Production : 2,677 Mbbl Water Cut : 80 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 35
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 2.232 bfpd/psi
BHT : 195 f
Well E288
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 358 bbl/d
Water Rate : 1345 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
Perforation Interval : 6270 ' – 6280 '
First Pump Installed Date : Jun. 8, 1987 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: D-13 113 Stage 30 HP SBHP : 2211 psi
Existing Pump:GN-2500 83 Stage 120 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 950 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 972 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 110 psi
Cum. Water Production : 2,253 Mbbl Water Cut : 79 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 35
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 5.86 bfpd/psi
BHT : 191 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E290
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 243 bbl/d
Water Rate : 2459 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
First Pump Installed Date : Aug. 9, 1989 Perforation Interval : 6257 ' – 6272 '
Type: DN-1750 100 Stage 40 HP Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps GN-4000 SBHP : 2312 psi
100 Stage, 18 Stage 180 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 1,196 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 120 psi
Cum. Water Production : 10,427 Mbbl Water Cut : 91 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 6 bfpd/psi
BHT : 189 f
Well E291
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 166 bbl/d
Water Rate : 843 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
First Pump Installed Date : Aug. 11, 1994 Perforation Interval : 6246 ' – 6252 '
Type: DN-450 191 Stage 30 HP Tubing Size : 2 7/8 ''
Existing Pump: Two Pumps DN-1750 SBHP : 2000 psi
116 Stage, 58 Stage 80 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 770 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 439.6 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 100 psi
Cum. Water Production : 1,106 Mbbl Water Cut : 83.6 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 6100 '
PI : 2.1 bfpd/psi
BHT : 189 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Well E300
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 713 bbl/d
Water Rate : 560 bbl/d
Casing Size : 9 5/8'' OD, 8.921'' ID
Perforation Interval : 6216 ' – 6254 '
First Pump Installed Date : Jan. 14, 1997 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: DN-1750 113 Stage 30 HP SBHP : 2366 psi
Existing Pump:DN-1750 116 Stage 40 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 927 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 1,813 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 150 psi
Cum. Water Production : 864 Mbbl Water Cut : 44 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 40
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 2.91 bfpd/psi
BHT : 186 f
Well E317
ESP Design Data
Oil Rate : 1298 bbl/d
Water Rate : 26 bbl/d
Casing Size : 7 '' OD, 6.366 '' ID
Perforation Interval : 6205 ' – 6220 '
First Pump Installed Date : Jun. 1, 2002 Tubing Size : 3 1/2 ''
Type: DN-1750 166 Stage 70 HP SBHP : 2290 psi
Existing Pump:DN-1750 166 Stage 100 HP Bubble Point Pressure : 800 psi
Cum. Oil Production : 2,097 Mbbl Wellhead Pressure : 76 psi
Cum. Water Production : 70.9 Mbbl Water Cut : 2 %
Water Gradient : 0.433 psi/ft
API : 39
Pump Seating Depth : 6000 '
PI : 3.1 bfpd/psi
BHT : 188 f
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Figure C.1
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Figure C.2
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
Table C.1
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves
B. Sc. Project Appendix C ESP Design Data & Pump Performance Curves