Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shahzad Et Al-2013-Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Shahzad Et Al-2013-Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
SALINITY STRESS
Keywords Abstract
apoplast; growth; field bean; Na+ toxicity;
salinity; silicon; oertli hypothesis Salinity primarily affects plants by inhibiting shoot growth. Salt-sensitive plants
have been suggested to accumulate Na+ within their leaf apoplast under salinity,
Correspondence leading to a reduced water status. Evidence related to apoplastic Na+ accumula-
K. H. Mühling tion is still enigmatic. We have focused on the effect of a short-term salt treat-
Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
ment by using the salt-sensitive Vicia faba. Moreover, we have examined the role
Christian Albrechts University
of silicon in alleviating sodium accumulation in the apoplast. Salt-sensitive field
Hermann-Rodewald-Str. 2
24118 Kiel beans have been subjected to increasing levels of salinity, with and without the
Germany addition of silicon under hydroponic conditions. We have demonstrated that the
Tel.: +49 0431 880 3189 dicot Vicia faba exhibits a rise in Na+ concentration in the leaf apoplast at higher
Fax: +49 0431 880 1625 salinity levels; this is significantly ameliorated by the addition of silicon. Further,
Email: khmuehling@plantnutrition.uni-kiel.de enhanced shoot growth under high salt treatment in the presence of added silicon
is correlated with a significant decrease in Na+ concentration in the leaves. The
Accepted August 22, 2012
novelty of the current study is the detection of a high Na+ concentration in the
doi:10.1111/jac.12003 leaf apoplast of the salt-sensitive dicot field bean. Our results support Oertli’s
hypothesis that extracellular salt accumulation can lead to wilting leaves, plant
growth reduction and cell death.
Table 1 Influence of salinity on Na+:K+, Na+:Ca2+ and Na+:Mg2+ ratios reduction in K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations,
in whole leaf. Significant differences between salinity and silicon treat- correspondingly (Figs 3d and 4a,d).
ments (P < 0.05) are indicated by small and capital letters, respectively
(n 3)
Extracted AWF
NaCl Na+:K+ Na+:Ca2+ Na+:Mg2+ In the apoplast of field bean leaves, soluble Na+ signifi-
Treatment cantly increased at 100 mM NaCl compared with other salt
(mM) Si + Si Si + Si Si + Si treatments (Fig. 3b). At higher salinity levels, the addition
Control 0.04 0.01 0.24 0.09 0.44 0.15 of silicon significantly reduced the Na+ concentration in
Ad Ac Ad Ac Ad Ac the apoplast (Fig. 3b). Moreover, at 75 and 100 mM NaCl,
50 1.32 1.28 8.61 7.76 7.99 9.27 the addition of silicon led to a significant reduction of
Ac Ab Ac Ab Ac Ab 53 % and 31 % in the Na+ concentration in the AWF.
75 2.93 2.30 15.3 10.9 17.5 13.8 Maximum concentrations of 83 and 121 mM Na+ were
Ab Aa Ab Bb Ab Bab
found at 100 mM NaCl treatment with and without silicon.
100 4.94 3.32 23.9 16.6 27.8 17.6
Aa Ba Aa Ba Aa Ba
The increase in Na+ concentration compared with control
was 13-, 140- and 344-fold at 50, 75 and 100 mM NaCl
treatment, accordingly; however, on the addition of silicon,
the increase in Na+ concentration was less prominent at 5-,
Table 2 Influence of salinity on apoplastic Na+:K+, Na+:Ca2+ and Na+: 25- and 91-fold. Soluble K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations
Mg2+ ratios. Significant differences between salinity and silicon treat- also increased with increasing salinity levels (Figs 3e and
ments (P < 0.05) are indicated by small and capital letters, respectively
4b,e). Addition of silicon significantly increased the soluble
(n 3)
Ca2+ concentration at maximum salinity level when com-
NaCl Na+:K+ Na+:Ca2+ Na+:Mg2+ pared with the respective salinity treatment without silicon
Treatment (Fig. 4b).
(mM) Si + Si Si + Si Si + Si
resulted in a decrease by 14 % in Cl concentration but sensitive plants. This accumulation in the cytoplasm will
was not significant (Fig. 5a). Surprisingly, the NO3 con- then cause enzyme inhibition (Kaiser et al. 1986) and the
centration was significantly higher on the addition of sili- breakdown of metabolism (Speer and Kaiser 1991). In
con in the control (Fig. 5d). Under salinity, the addition of comparison with the earlier investigations with monocots
silicon did not, however, change the NO3 concentration (Lohaus et al. 2000, Mühling and Läuchli 2002a, 2003,
when compared with its respective sole salinity treatment Shahzad et al. 2012), high Na+ and Cl concentrations in
(Fig. 5d). the leaf apoplast of dicots such as pea (Speer and Kaiser
1991) and field bean (in current study) might contribute to
Extracted AWF the salt sensitivity of these plant species.
A significant maximum soluble Cl concentration was
detected at 100 mM NaCl (Fig. 5b). When compared with
Subcellular ion distribution in leaves under increasing
non-silicon-treated plants, silicon-treated plants showed a
NaCl
significantly lower Cl concentration in their leaf apoplast
at maximum salinity level (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, when A limited number of studies have investigated cations and
compared with the control, the NO3 concentration was anions at the subcellular level in field bean leaves under
significantly reduced at 74 %, 75 % and 90 % at 50, 75 salinity. Stress by salinity has often been reported to cause a
and 100 mM NaCl (Fig. 5e). reduction in plant growth via ion toxicity, in particular,
Na+ toxicity (Kaiser et al. 1986, Fortmeier and Schubert
Symplastic fluid 1995, Tester and Davenport 2003).
An increase in the Cl concentration in the symplast of In contrast to the earlier findings with monocots
field bean leaves was noticed with increasing salinity levels (Lohaus et al. 2000, Mühling and Läuchli 2002a, 2003),
(Fig. 5c). Moreover, silicon addition significantly reduced the accumulation of Na+ and Cl that we have observed
the Cl concentration (by 31 %) in the symplast at maxi- in the apoplast of field bean leaves during salt treatment
mum salinity treatment when compared with its respective without silicon addition might be attributable to higher
sole salinity treatment. Further, maximum 127 and xylem import. Upon the arrival of saline solutes in the leaf
166 mM Cl concentrations were found at 100 mM NaCl apoplast, two mechanisms are available to exclude them from
with and without silicon, respectively. Additionally, the the cytoplasm. Salt ions can be concentrated in the apoplast
NO3 concentration was significantly reduced, with a more or isolated within the vacuole. Accumulation of Na+ and Cl
than 90 % reduction at all salinity levels (Fig. 5f). in the apoplast (Figs 3b and 5b) gradually increases the
osmotic gradient between the inside and outside of the cell.
As a result, intracellular water moves outwards into the
Discussion
apoplast to achieve a thermodynamic equilibrium, leading to
progressive cellular dehydration and, eventually, cell death
Reduction of leaf growth under NaCl stress
(Volkmar et al. 1998).
A significant decline in plant biomass under salinity reflects The high Na+ concentration in the apoplast of field bean
the rapid decrease in shoot growth and wall extensibility in leaves under salt stress supports the results of an earlier
the osmotic phase of salt stress (Munns and Tester 2008, study of salt-sensitive rice plants grown under mild saline
Szalai and Janda 2009, Geilfus et al. 2011). Earlier studies conditions (50 mM NaCl), which produced a high apoplas-
have reported the predominant importance of Na+ over, tic Na+ concentration of up to 600 mM (Flowers et al.
for example, Cl for many crop plant species as a reason 1991). However, this high apoplastic Na+ concentration
for ion-specific damage during salt stress (Fortmeier and was detected through X-ray microanalysis in which prob-
Schubert 1995, Tester and Davenport 2003, Slabu et al. lems are experienced in the resolution of small apoplastic
2009). In addition, Sümer et al. (2004) have demonstrated spaces for the precise detection of Na+ and the differentia-
a contribution of Na+ toxicity in the first phase of salt tion between Na+ and K+. In addition, the dicot salt-sensitive
stress. In the current investigation, added NaCl resulted in pea (Speer and Kaiser 1991) shows a higher apoplastic Na+
a significant increase in leaf apoplastic Na+ concentration concentration. In contrast, other studies have demonstrated
(Fig. 3b). This has previously been suggested as a possible extremely low Na+ concentrations in the leaf apoplast of the
reason for the decline in leaf growth (Oertli 1968, Flowers salt-sensitive monocots maize and wheat (Lohaus et al. 2000,
et al. 1991). Later reports have also indicated that a possi- Mühling and Läuchli 2002a, 2003, Wimmer et al. 2003,
ble reason for the differential salt resistance of plants is Shahzad et al. 2012). Therefore, the high Na+ concentration in
their ability to control total salt fluxes into the leaf apoplast the leaf apoplast of the salt-sensitive field bean (Fig. 3b) and pea
and into the cells. With increasing salinity, a highly loaded (Speer and Kaiser 1991) suggest that Oertli’s hypothesis is only
apoplast might favour salt flux into the symplast of salt- valid for dicot plants.
AWF extracted (μl g–1 FW) 900 Aa –Si In the cytosol, Na+ competes with K+ for binding sites
800 Aa +Si
Aa resulting in the inactivation of enzymes and cellular func-
700 Aa
600 Ab
tions on binding of Na+ (Tester and Davenport 2003). We
Ab
500 Ab have shown that K+ concentrations are significantly
400 Bb
reduced in whole leaf tissue and the symplast of field bean
300
200 under salinity (Fig. 3d,f), and this indicates that the Na+:K+
100 ratio should be considered when determining Na+ toxicity.
0
1 50 75 100
Moreover, high Na+ causes disturbances in Ca2+ nutrition
NaCl treatment (mM) (Cramer 2002, Essa 2002, Hu et al. 2007). We have found a
significant reduction in Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations
Fig. 2 Influence of increasing NaCl concentration on the AWF extrac- under salinity in the symplast and whole leaf tissue (Fig. 4a,
tion volume from the leaves of Vicia faba cv Scirocco. The plants were d,c,f), even under low salt-stress conditions (50 mM NaCl).
treated for 12 days in a greenhouse with (black bars) and without Indeed, higher ratios of Na+:K+, Na+:Ca2+ and Na+:Mg2+
(white bars) 1 mM silicon treatment. Significant differences between
under salt treatment have been observed in whole leaf
salinity and silicon treatments (P < 0.05) are indicated by small and
capital letters, respectively (n 3).
tissue, apoplast and symplast (Tables 1–3). These higher
ratios indicate that Ca2+, K+ and Mg2+ transport is
impaired into the leaf cells by high Na+ concentrations
Na+ concentration (μmol g–1 FW)
(a) (d)
60 60 Ab Ab
40 40 Ac Ac Ac
Ac
20 20
Ad Ac
0 0
120
K+ concentration (mM)
120
100
Ba
100 Aa
80 Aa
80
60 Ab
60 Ab Ab
40
40
Bb Abc Ab
20 20 Ac Ab
Ac Ab Ac Ab
0 0
Aa
K+ concentration (mM)
Aa 100
200
Aa
Aa 80
150 Ba
Ab 60
Ab Ab
100 Ab
40
Ac Ac Ac
50 Ac
20
Ac Ac
0 0
1 50 75 100 1 50 75 100
NaCl treatment (mM) NaCl treatment (mM)
Fig. 3 Effect of increasing NaCl supply on [Na+] and [K+] concentrations in whole shoot (a) & (d), in extracted AWF (b) & (e) and in symplastic fluid (c)
& (f) of Vicia faba cv Scirocco with (black bars) and without (white bars) 1 mM silicon treatment. Significant differences between salinity and silicon
treatments (P < 0.05) are indicated by small and capital letters, respectively (n 3). [Correction added on 16 October 2012, after first online publi-
cation: Y-axis value for (d) was amended from K2+ to K+].
(a) (d)
25 –Si 14
Aa Aa Aa
Aa +Si 12
20
10
Ab
15 8 Ab
Ab
Ac Ab
10 6 Ac
Ab Ab
Ab Ab
Ab Ab 4
5
2
0 0
10 (b) 10 (e)
Aa
9 9
8 8
7 7
6 6 Aa
Ba
5 5 Aa
4 Ab 4
3 3 Ab
Ab Ab Ab Ab
2 2 Ac
Abc Ab Ac
1 Ab 1
Ac
0 0
70 (c) 16 Aa (f)
Aa Aa
Aa
Ca2+ concentration (mM)
60 14
50 12
10
40
Ab Ab
8 Ab Ab
30 Ab Ab Ab Ab
Ab 6 Ab
20 Ab Ab
4
10 2
0 0
1 50 75 100 1 50 75 100
NaCl treatment (mM) NaCl treatment (mM)
Fig. 4 Effect of increasing NaCl supply on [Ca2+] and [Mg2+] concentrations in whole shoot (a) & (d), in extracted AWF (b) & (e) and in symplastic fluid
(c) & (f) of Vicia faba cv Scirocco with (black bars) and without (white bars) 1 mM silicon treatment. Significant differences between salinity and silicon
treatments (P < 0.05) are indicated by small and capital letters, respectively (n 3).
under saline conditions and might be responsible for (Hu and Schmidhalter 2005). For nitrate, we have observed
the disturbance of plant metabolism and reduced plant a strong depletion in all shoot compartments under salt
growth. stress (Fig. 5d–f). Most likely, under high salinity, the
In addition, salinity exposure leads to a significant antagonism between Cl and NO3 results in a significant
increase in Cl concentration in all leaf compartments reduction in the NO3 concentration, both with and with-
(Fig. 5a–c). However, Tavakkoli et al. (2011) have demon- out the addition of silicon.
strated that Cl is more important than Na+ when plants
are grown in salt-affected soils. In contrast to Na+, little is
Effect of silicon on shoot biomass and subcellular ion
known about the molecular mechanisms behind the sub-
distribution in leaves under salinity
stantial Cl influx that results from salinization (Flowers
and Colmer 2008). After NaCl exposure, high Cl concen- Silicon is well known as being able to increase the
trations in the chloroplasts, amplified by a simultaneously stress resistance of many plant species (Zuccarini 2008,
high Na+ concentration, can lead to a reduction of chloro- Saqib et al. 2008, Pei et al. 2010). The addition of sili-
phyll in the leaves of the faba bean (Slabu et al. 2009). The con to the hydroponic solution significantly increases
increased shoot Cl concentration under salinity is often the shoot fresh weight at higher salinity levels (Fig. 1).
found to reduce the NO3 concentration, nitrogen playing a No significant effect of added silicon has been observed
critical role in determining the growth of salinized plants on the fresh weight of shoots of control (1 mM NaCl)
0 0.0
1.0
160
0.9
140
0.8
120 Ba 0.7
100 0.6
80 0.5
0.4 Aa
60 Ab
Ab 0.3
40 Ba
Abc Abc 0.2 Ab Aa
20 Ac Ac 0.1 Ab Ab Ab Ab
0 0.0
1.0
160
0.9
140 Ab Ba
0.8
120 Aa 0.7
Ab Ba
100 0.6
Aab
80 0.5
0.4
60
0.3
40 Ac Ab 0.2
Ab Ab Ab Ab Ab Ab
20 0.1
0 0.0
1 50 75 100 1 50 75 100
NaCl treatment (mM) NaCl treatment (mM)
Fig. 5 Influence of increasing salinity on [Cl ] and [NO3 ] concentrations in whole shoot (a) & (d), in extracted AWF (b) & (e) and in symplastic fluid (c)
& (f) of Vicia faba cv Scirocco with (black bars) and without (white bars) 1 mM silicon treatment. Significant differences between salinity and silicon
treatments (P < 0.05) are indicated by small and capital letters, respectively (n 3).
plants; this suggests that silicon available from the with the respective salinity treatments alone (Fig. 3b).
water and chemicals used to prepare the standard cul- It is known that silicon is mainly deposited in the leaf
ture solution satisfies any specific requirement in the apoplast (Rogalla and Römheld 2002). This can result
faba bean (Matoh et al. 1986, Yeo et al. 1999). Further- in reduced Na+ accumulation in the leaf apoplast which
more, we have found a significant reduction in the vol- is correlated with significant increase in shoot growth
ume of extracted AWF at higher salinity levels, a under high salt treatment. An ameliorative effect of
volume that is significantly greater following the addi- silicon with a significant decrease in Na+ concentration
tion of silicon at 100 mM NaCl (Fig. 2). Changes in has been observed in whole leaf tissue and the symplast
cell wall structure (Zhong and Läuchli 1993) together of the field bean at higher salinity levels (Fig. 3a,c).
with the water stress imposed by salinity might lead to Silicon application in previous studies also been reported
the differences in extracted AWF (Mühling and Läuchli to influence manganese detoxification via the binding of
2002a). However, the beneficial effects of added silicon manganese to the cell wall and thus decreasing its pres-
on plant growth have been linked to reduced Na+ ence in the cell sap (cytoplastic and apoplastic fluid)
translocation and decreased transpiration under salinity (Iwasaki et al. 2002, Rogalla and Römheld 2002). More-
(Gong et al. 2006, Pei et al. 2010). The effect of added over, on the application of silicon, the significantly higher
silicon at 75 and 100 mM NaCl on the apoplastic Na+ Ca2+ concentration in the leaf apoplast (Fig. 4b) might
concentration is significantly reduced when compared have a positive role in enhanced leaf expansion, as a
reasonable amount of Ca2+ is required to maintain Cosgrove, D. J., and R. E. Cleland, 1983: Solutes in the free space
plasma membrane integrity and function (Wei et al. 2003, of growing stem tissue. Plant Physiol. 72, 326–331.
Cramer 2002), together with cell wall extensibility. In Cramer, G. R., 2002: Sodium-calcium interactions under salinity
plants, calcium is transported via the xylem and its trans- stress. In: Salinity: Environment– Plants–Molecules, pp. 205–
port depends on transpiration (Arndt et al. 2000). One 228. Kluwer Acad. Pub, London, UK.
possible explanation for the improved Ca2+ transport in Essa, T. A., 2002: Effect of salinity stress on growth and nutrient
silicon-treated plants under salt stress is increased transpi- composition of three soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) culti-
ration as observed in previous studies of stressed plants vars. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 188, 86–93.
Flowers, T. J., and T. D. Colmer, 2008: Salinity tolerance in halo-
treated with silicon (Gong et al. 2005, Hattori et al.
phytes. New Phytol. 179, 945–963.
2005). The addition of silicon at higher salinity signifi-
Flowers, T. J., M. A. Hajibagheri, and A. R. Yeo, 1991: Ion accu-
cantly reduces the salt concentration in the leaf apoplast
mulation in the cell walls of rice plants growing under saline
of field bean plants (Figs 3b and 5b). The build-up of
conditions: evidence for the Oertli hypothesis. Plant Cell Envi-
Na+ and Cl in the apoplast suggests that the sensitivity
ron. 14, 319–325.
of the field bean maybe attributable to their inability to Fortmeier, R., and S. Schubert, 1995: Salt tolerance of maize
control the total salt flux into the leaf apoplast. (Zea mays L.): the role of sodium exclusion. Plant Cell Envi-
ron. 18, 1041–1047.
Conclusion Geilfus, C. M., C. Zörb, C. Neuhaus, T. Hansen, H. Lüthen, and
K. H. Mühling, 2011: Differential transcript expression of
In contrast to the earlier publications on monocots (wheat, wall-loosening candidates in leaves of maize cultivars differing
maize) (Mühling and Läuchli 2002a, 2003, Shahzad et al. in salt resistance. J. Plant Growth Regul. 30, 387–395.
2012), we now demonstrate that the dicot Vicia faba exhib- Gong, H., X. Zhu, K. Chen, S. Wang, and C. Zhang, 2005: Sili-
its a rise in the Na+ concentration in the leaf apoplast at con alleviates oxidative damage of wheat plants in pots under
higher salinity levels and that this rise is significantly ame- drought. Plant Sci. 169, 313–321.
liorated by the addition of silicon. Similar findings have Gong, H. J., D. P. Randall, and T. J. Flowers, 2006: Silicon depo-
been detected for the Cl concentration in the leaf apop- sition in the root reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa
last. Furthermore, the addition of silicon significantly L.) seedlings by reducing bypass flow. Plant Cell Environ. 29,
decreases the Na+ concentration in the symplast and whole 1970–1979.
leaf tissue at maximum salinity levels. A high Na+ concen- Hattori, T., S. Inanaga, H. Araki, P. An, S. Morita, M. Luxova,
tration in the leaf apoplast of the salt-sensitive dicot field and A. Lux, 2005: Application of silicon enhanced drought
bean supports Oertli’s hypothesis that extracellular salt tolerance in Sorghum bicolor. Physiol. Plantarum 123, 459–
accumulation can lead to wilting leaves, growth reduction 466.
Hong, C. Y., Y. Y. Chao, M. Y. Yang, S. C. Cho, and C. H. Kao,
and cell death.
2009: Na+ but not Cl– or osmotic stress is involved in NaCl-
induced expression of glutathione reductase in roots of rice
Acknowledgments seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 166, 1598–1606.
Hu, Y., and U. Schmidhalter, 2005: Drought and salinity: a com-
M.S. acknowledges the award of a research scholarship
parison of their effects on the mineral nutrition of plants.
from the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 168, 541–549.
and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). The Hu, Y., Z. Burucs, S. v. Tucher, and U. Schmidhalter, 2007:
authors thank Annegret Thießen, Stephanie thor Straten Short-term effects of drought and salinity on mineral nutrient
and Sajid Masood for their excellent technical assistance. distribution along growing leaves of maize seedlings. Environ.
They are also grateful to Peter and Theresa Jones for Exp. Bot. 60, 268–275.
language correction. Husted, S., and J. K. Schjoerring, 1995: Apoplastic pH and
ammonium concentration in leaves of Brassica napus L. Plant
Physiol. 109, 1453–1460.
References
Iwasaki, K., P. Maier, M. Fecht, and W. J. Horst, 2002: Effects of
Ahmad, R., S. H. Zaheer, and S. Ismail, 1992: Role of silicon in silicon supply on apoplastic manganese concentrations in
salt tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 85, leaves and their relation to manganese tolerance in cowpea
43–50. (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Plant Soil 238, 281–288.
Arndt, S. K., W. Wanek, S. C. Clifford, and M. Popp, 2000: Con- Kaiser, W. M., G. Schroppel-Meier, and E. Wirth, 1986: Enzyme
trasting adaptations to drought stress in field-grown Ziziphus activities in an artificial stroma medium. Planta 167, 292–299.
mauritiana and Prunus persica trees: water relations, osmotic Lohaus, G., M. Hussmann, K. Pennewiss, H. Schneider, J. J.
adjustment and carbon isotope composition. Aust. J. Plant Zhu, and B. Sattelmacher, 2000: Solute balance of a maize
Physiol. 27, 985–996. (Zea mays L.) source leaf as affected by salt treatment with
special emphasis on phloem retranslocation and ion leaching. Shahzad, M., K. Witzel, C. Zörb, and K. H. Mühling, 2012:
J. Exp. Bot. 51, 1721–1732. Growth-related changes in subcellular ion patterns in maize
Lohaus, G., K. Pennewiss, B. Sattelmacher, M. Hussmann, and leaves (Zea mays L.) under salt stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 198,
K. H. Mühling, 2001: Is the infiltration-centrifugation tech- 46–56.
nique appropriate for the isolation of apoplastic fluid? A criti- Slabu, C., C. Zörb, D. Steffens, and S. Schubert, 2009: Is salt
cal evaluation with different plant species. Physiol. Plantarum stress of faba bean (Vicia faba) caused by Na+ or Cl toxicity?
111, 457–465. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 172, 644–650.
Masood, S., M. A. Wimmer, K. Witzel, C. Zörb, and K. H. Speer, M., and W. M. Kaiser, 1991: Ion relations of symplastic
Mühling, 2012: Interactive effects of high boron and NaCl and apoplastic space in leaves from Spinacia oleracea L. and
stresses on subcellular localization of chloride and boron in Pisum sativum L. under salinity. Plant Physiol. 97, 990–997.
wheat leaves. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 198, 227–235. Sümer, A., C. Zörb, F. Yan, and S. Schubert, 2004: Evidence of
Matoh, T., P. Kairusmee, and E. Takahashi, 1986: Salt-induced sodium toxicity for the vegetative growth of maize (Zea mays
damage to rice plants and alleviation effect of silicate. Soil Sci. L.) during the first phase of salt stress. J. Appl. Bot. 78, 135–
Plant Nutr. 32, 295–304. 139.
Mühling, K. H., and A. Läuchli, 2002a: Effect of salt stress on Szalai, G., and T. Janda, 2009: Effect of salt stress on the salicylic
growth and cation compartmentation in leaves of two plant acid synthesis in young maize (Zea mays L.) plants. J. Agron.
species differing in salt tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 159, 137–146. Crop Sci. 195, 165–171.
Mühling, K. H., and A. Läuchli, 2002b: Determination of apo- Tavakkoli, E., F. Fatehi, S. Coventry, P. Rengasamy, and G. K.
plastic Na+ in intact leaves of cotton by in vivo fluorescence McDonald, 2011: Additive effects of Na+ and Cl ions on bar-
ratio imaging. Funct. Plant Biol. 29, 1491–1499. ley growth under salinity stress. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 2189–2203.
Mühling, K. H., and A. Läuchli, 2003: Interaction of NaCl Tester, M., and R. Davenport, 2003: Na+ tolerance and Na+
and Cd stress on compartmentation pattern of cations, anti- transport in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 91, 503–527.
oxidant enzymes and proteins in leaves of two wheat Volkmar, K. M., Y. Hu, and H. Steppuhn, 1998: Physiological
genotypes differing in salt tolerance. Plant Soil 253, 219–231. responses of plants to salinity: a review. Can. J. Plant Sci. 78,
Mühling, K. H., and B. Sattelmacher, 1995: Apoplastic ion con- 19–27.
centration of intact leaves of field bean (Vicia faba) as influ- Wei, W. X., P. E. Bilsborrow, P. Hooley, D. A. Fincham, E.
enced by ammonium and nitrate nutrition. J. Plant Physiol. Lombi, and B. P. Forster, 2003: Salinity induced differences in
147, 81–86. growth, ion distribution and partitioning in barley between
Munns, R., 2002: Comparative physiology of salt and water the cultivar Maythorpe and its derived mutant golden prom-
stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 239–250. ise. Plant Soil 250, 183–191.
Munns, R., and M. Tester, 2008: Mechanisms of salinity toler- Wimmer, M. A., K. H. Mühling, A. Läuchli, P. H. Brown,
ance. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681. and H. E. Goldbach, 2003: The interaction between salin-
Oertli, J. J., 1968: Extracellular salt accumulation, a possible ity and boron toxicity affects the subcellular distribution
mechanism of salt injury in plants. Agrochimica 12, 461–469. of ions and proteins in wheat leaves. Plant Cell Environ.
Pei, Z. F., D. F. Ming, D. Liu, G. L. Wan, X. X. Geng, H. J. Gong, 26, 1267–1274.
and W. J. Zhou, 2010: Silicon improves the tolerance to Yeo, A. R., S. A. Flowers, G. Rao, K. Welfare, N. Senanayake,
water-deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol in wheat and T. J. Flowers, 1999: Silicon reduces sodium uptake in rice
(Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 29, (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions and this is accounted for
106–115. by a reduction in the transpirational bypass flow. Plant Cell
Rogalla, H., and V. Römheld, 2002: Role of leaf apoplast in sili- Environ. 22, 559–565.
con mediated manganese tolerance of Cucumis sativus L. Plant Zhong, H., and A. Läuchli, 1993: Changes of cell wall composi-
Cell Environ. 25, 549–555. tion and polymer size in primary roots of cotton seedlings
Saqib, M., C. Zörb, and S. Schubert, 2008: Silicon-mediated under salt stress. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 773–778.
improvement in the salt resistance of wheat (Triticum aes- Zuccarini, P., 2008: Effects of silicon on photosynthesis, water
tivum) results from increased sodium exclusion and resistance relations and nutrient uptake of Phaseolus vulgaris under NaCl
to oxidative stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 35, 633–639. stress. Biol. Plantarum 52, 157–160.