Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 Micro 3 Individual Choice 1
3 Micro 3 Individual Choice 1
3 Micro 3 Individual Choice 1
1. Individual Utility
{
tickets while the individual’s utility is
kept at the same level.
5
The additional utility derived from the
10 B
3 { 7 C
extra unit of meal is diminishing.
2 { 5 D
1 { E
4
Indifference Curve
• The position of the indifference curve represents the level of utility the
individual derives from consuming the combination of meals and movies.
• Notice that points on the same Indifference Curve give exactly the same level
of utility.
Exercise:
Can two indifference curves which represent the utility function of the same
individual intercept with each other?
• Marginal utility measures the increase in utility with a small change in the
consumption of one good while the consumption of the other good is fixed.
• In the case of two goods x and y, if we fix the quantity of y and increase the
quantity of x, the change in total utility is shown below.
U
U ( x, y )
24
18
10
x
1 2 3
• Moving from point A to point B, the individual gives up dy units of y and gains dx
units of x.
A
dy
B
dx U ( x, y)
• From point A to point B, the total utility is kept at the same level. Hence, we have
dy MU x
dx × MU x = dy × MU y ⇒ =
dx MU y
dy
• Mathematically, the slope of the indifference curve is . It must also equal to
dx
MU x
.
MU y
MU x
• is also called marginal rate of substitution (MRS). It thus shows the rate at
MU y
which individuals can substitute y for x without changing the total level of
satisfaction.
Exercise:
What is the level of MRS when individual increases the consumption of x? Why?
• In a world of two goods, let the price of x be Px and the price of y be Py, the
individual’s budget constraint can be written as,
Px x + Py y = I
I
Py
Px
Py
I x
Px
• The intercepts are the points where the individual uses his, or her, entire income
for the consumption of one good. In such a case, the individual will be able to buy
I
units of good i (where i =x,y)
pi
• If the individual consumes x and y such that his/her income is exhausted, the
combination of x and y must be on the budget line.
• The slope of the budget line gives us the market rate of exchange between x and y
or, which means, the price of x in terms of y.
• Suppose we are on the budget line, if we now choose to consume 1 less units of x,
how many more units of y will we be able to buy?
• If Px = $10 and Py = $5 then giving up one unit of x will leave $10 which we can
now spend on y.
I0
Py0
y0 A
B
y1
C
Px0
Py0
x0 x0 +1 I0 x
Px0
• Therefore, the slope of the budget line reveals the exchange rate between x and y
that will be facilitated by the market. It also shows the opportunity cost of one
good in terms of the other.
Exercise 1:
1. In a world of two goods x and y, price of x is Px0 and price of y is Py0 . An
individual receives an income of I 0 for the consumption of x and y.
a. Draw the individual’s budget line clearly labelling the values of its intercepts on
x-axis and y-axis as well as its slope. For example, I 0 = 100; Px0 = 10; Py0 = 10 .
b. Show the change in the individual’s budget line when the individual’s income
increases while the prices of x and y remain at the same level. For example,
I1 = 120; Px0 = 10; Py0 = 10 .
c. Show the change in the individual’s budget line when the individual’s income
decreases while the prices of x and y remain at the same level. For example,
I 2 = 80; Px0 = 10; Py0 = 10 .
I0
Py0
Px0
Py0
I0 x
Px0
I0
Py0
Px0
Py0
I0 x
Px0
f. (
Starting from (a) where )
I = I 0 , Px = Px0 , Py = Py0 , show the change in the
individual’s budget line when price of x increases, at the same time, price of y
I0
Py0
Px0
Py0
I0 x
Px0
g. Initially, I 0 = 100; Px0 = 10; Py0 = 10; show the change in the individual’s budget
line: the price remains at the same level of $10 per unit for the purchase of first 5
units of good x. The price falls to $5 per unit for any additional unit purchased.
There is no change in the price of y and the individual’s income.
• Given that the individual always wants more of all economic goods, we say that
all the individuals want to maximize their utility.
• When we have more x and y, the higher will be our utility curve. In other words,
utility is increasing in both x and y.
U2
U1
U0
Px x + Py y = I
• Recall that an economic problem is the problem that deals with “How do we
satisfy our unlimited desires or wants, with scarce or limited means?”
• Combining the utility and budget line, we say that the individual wants to
maximize utility (i.e. choose the most preferred bundle or, highest possible level
of utility curve) subject to the budget constraint (i.e. from the set of feasible
bundles).
• Given the shape of the indifference curve, the highest level of utility we can
achieve is when the indifference curve is tangent to the budget line.
• Tangency means that the slope of the indifference curve is the same as the slope
of the budget line at the point of tangency.
y*
y1
U0
x0 x1 I0 x
x*
Px0
dy MU x P
Recall that the slope of utility curve is = . As the slope of budget line is x ,
dx MU y Py
maximizing utility implies that at the point of tangency between the utility curve and
the budget line, it is necessary that
MU x Px
=
MU y Py
• The slope of indifference curve represents the level of MRS, the rate at which
individuals can substitute y for x without changing the total level of satisfaction.
• The slope of budget line reveals the exchange rate between x and y that will be
facilitated by the market. It also shows the opportunity cost of x in terms of y.
• At the optimum, the two rates must equal. Individuals must be compensated for
Px
units of y for giving up with 1 unit of x.
Py
4. Rational behaviour
1) First, individuals must always prefer the choice of goods that give higher level
Intuitively, this says that when B is affordable today, the individual does not buy
B. Instead, he/she chooses to buy A.
Today, the individual chooses to buy A because he/she cannot afford B. This
reveals that he prefers B to A.
However, the fact that the individual buys B implies that A must be also
affordable tomorrow.
y y
I0
Py0
I1
Py1
A
y0
B
y1
U0
U1
I0 x
x0
Px0 x1 I1 x
Px1
3. If Px0x1 + Py0y1 = I0 ( x0 < x1 ; y0 > y1 ) , combining the two must show the
following:
I0
Py0
I1
Py1
y0 A
U0
y1 B
x0 x1 I0 I1 x
Px0 Px1
y
I0
Py0
U0
I1
Py1
y0 A
B
y1
x0 x1 I0 I1 x
Px0 Px1
Example:
An individual with income I=90 consumes only two goods x and y when confronted
with prices Px = 20, Py = 10, he will choose to consume 3 units of both x and y. With
income of I = 120, and prices Px = 10 and Py =20, however, he will choose to
consume 2 units of x and 5 units of y. therefore, the consumer cannot be rational. True
of false, explain.
I1
Py1
5
B
3 A
U0
I0 I1 x
2 3
Px0 Px1
Px0x0 + Py0y0 = 20 × 3 + 10 × 3 = 90
If point A is the intersecting point of both budget lines, A must be on the new budget
line as well. That is, new price times old bundle equals new income.
However, the amount of income required to purchase ( x0 , y0 ) is less than new level of
income, old bundles (point A) is under new budget line. This is shown below,
If point B is the intersecting point of both budget lines, B must be on the old budget
line as well. This means that old price times new bundle equals old income. This is
the case as:
Px0x1 + Py0y1 = 20 × 2 + 10 × 5 = 90 = I0
Point B is thus on the old budget line as well as the new budget line, i.e., B is the
intersecting point for both budget lines.
Plotting the individual utility curve on it, we found that B is Not a rational choice!
Example:
An individual with income I=100 consumes only two goods x and y. When
confronted with prices Px = 10, Py = 10, he will choose to consume 5 units of both x
and y. With income of I = 120, and prices Px = 10 and Py =30, however, he will
choose to consume 3 units of x and 3 units of y. Therefore, the consumer cannot be
rational. True of false, explain.
y
I0
Py0
5 A
I1
Py1 B
3
U0
3 5 I0 I1 x
Px0 Px1
As new prices time old bundle exceeds new income, point A is thus above the new
budget line.
As x0 > x1 and y0 > y1 , point B must be below the old budget line.
Both A and B are affordable today and the individual buys A. His choice of A reveals
that he prefers A than B.
Tomorrow, the individual choose B. This must be because that A is not affordable
tomorrow. And indeed, A is not affordable tomorrow. Hence, the individual is
rational.
Plotting the individual utility curve on it, we found that the individual is rational.
1. In a world of two goods x and y, draw the budget line when I = I 0 ; Py = Py0 .
However, price of x varies. For x ≤ x , Px = 0; x > x , Px > 0.
2. In a world of two goods x and y, draw the budget line when I = I 0 ; Py = Py0 .
However, price of x varies. For x ≤ x , Px = Px0 ; x > x , Px = Px1 , further,
0 < Px0 < Px1 .