Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heizer Chapter 5 - Design of Goods and Services
Heizer Chapter 5 - Design of Goods and Services
• It may be helpful to think of a product’s life as divided into four phases. Those phases
are introduction, growth, maturity, and decline.
• Product life cycles may be a matter of a few days (a concert t-shirt), months (seasonal
fashions), years (Madden NFL football video game), or decades (Boeing 737).
• Even after all these variations, job of operations manager is simple: Design a system
that helps in launching products effectively.
• Figure below shows the four life cycle stages and the relationship of product sales,
cash flow, and profit over the life cycle of a product -
• The typical reduction in profits over the decline phase is the main reason we need new
products.
• Just as operations managers must be prepared to develop new products, they must also
be prepared to develop strategies for new and existing products. Periodic examination
of products is appropriate because strategies change as products move through their
life cycle .
• Setting strategy according to life cycle stages is an effective strategy.
• Introduction Phase - As the product as well as its production techniques are in fine
tuning stage. It almost always involves Unusual expenditure on following:
1. research
2. product development
3. process modification and enhancement
4. supplier development
• Growth Phase - Hereproduct design has begun to stabilize, and effective forecasting
of capacity requirements is necessary. Adding capacity or enhancing existing capacity
to accommodate the increase in product demand may be necessary
• Maturity Stage - By the time a product is mature, competitors are established. So
highvolume, innovative production may be appropriate.
• Decline Stage - Management may need to be ruthless with those products whose life
cycle is at an end. Dying products are typically poor products in which to invest
resources and managerial talent. (Some exceptions Exist)
• Not all products are important. Resources are to be invested in the critical few and not
the trivial many (Paretto principle).
• Product-by-value analysis lists products in descending order of their individual
dollar contribution to the firm. It also lists the total annual dollar contribution of the
product.
• A product-by-value report allows management to evaluate possible strategies for each
product.
• The report may also tell management which product offerings should be eliminated
and which fail to justify further investment in research and development or capital
equipment.
• Products die or become obsolete due to various reasons. But because of that, product
decision process is also a continuous process.
• Knowing how to successfully find and develop new products is a requirement.
Societies reward those who supply new products that reflect their needs.
• Aggressiveapproach in this field requires an infrastructure ready to deal with
customer insights, R&D' production etc.
1. Understanding the customer is the premier issue in new-product development.
Lead users gives us in depth understanding of what works, what doesn't and
what's missing.
2. Economic change brings increasing levels of affluence in the long run but
economic cycles and price changes in the short run. (Seasonal changes but
fined long term trend).
3. Sociological and demographic change may appear in such factors as
decreasing family size. It impacts innovation in product designs (like
Technology).
4. Political and legal change brings about new trade agreements, tariffs, and
government requirements.
• An effective product strategy links product decisions with other business functions,
such as R&D, engineering, marketing, and finance.
• Firm also requires cash for necessary surveys, research and talent acquisition.
• Figure below shows the stages of product development. In this system, product
options go through a series of steps, each having its own screening and evaluation
criteria, but providing a continuing flow of information to prior steps.
Learning Objective 5.3 - Build a House of Quality (Mini one)
• Defining this relationship is the first step in building a world-class production system.
To build the house of quality, we perform seven basic steps:
1. Identify customer wants . (What do customers want in this product?)
2. Identify how the good/service will satisfy customer wants. (Identify specific
product characteristics, features, or attributes and show how they will satisfy
customer wants .)
3. Relate customer wants to product hows . (Build a matrix, as in Example
below)
4. Identify relationships between the firm’s hows . (How do our hows tie
together? For instance, in the following example, there is a high relationship
between low electricity requirements and auto focus, auto exposure, and
number of pixels because they all require electricity. This relationship is
shown in the “roof” of the house in Example 1 .)
5. Develop importance ratings. (Using the customer’s importance ratings and
weights for the relationships shown in the matrix, compute our importance
ratings, as in Example 1 .)
6. Evaluate competing products. (How well do competing products meet
customer wants? Such an evaluation, as shown in the two columns on the right
of the figure in Example 1 , would be based on market research.)
7. Determine the desirable technical attributes, your performance, and the
competitor’s performance against these attributes. (This is done at the bottom
of the figure in Example 1 .)
• QFD provides an analytical tool that structures design features and technical issues, as
well as providing importance rankings and competitor comparison.
• This is just House 1 for design characteristics. Input from this house is transferred to
west house in the development stage and so on (see figure below)
• Specific components are finalised to satisfy design characteristics.
• Production process is decided tomanufacture these specific components.
• Quality plan ensure adherence of specific standards.
• The sequence of houses is a very effective way of identifying, communicating, and
deploying production resources.
• As product life cycles shorten, the need for faster product development increases.
sophistication also increases investment and risks. Ultimately it becomes an edge to
launch products faster. To the swift goes the competitive advantage. This concept is
called time-based competition .
• Rapid introduction to the market may be good management because until competition
begins to introduce copies or improved versions, the product can sometimes be priced
high enough to justify somewhat inefficient production design and methods.
• Because time-based competition is so important, instead of developing new products
from
• scratch (which has been the focus thus far in this chapter), a number of other
strategies can be used.
• Figure below shows a continuum that goes from new, internally developed products
(on the lower left) to “alliances.”
• Enhancements and migrations use the organization’s existing product strengths for
innovation and therefore are typically faster while at the same time being less risky
than developing entirely new products.
• Enhancement means improving or changing an existing product.
• Boeing also uses its engineering prowess in air frames to migrate from one model to
the next. This allows Boeing to speed development while reducing both cost and risk
for new designs. This approach is also referred to as building on product platforms .
• The advantages are downward pressure on cost as well as faster development.
• As shown in figure, these above mentioned are strategies for internal development of
a product. The external development strategies are discussed in a bit detail below.
• Purchasing Technology by Acquiring a Firm - Firms speed development by
acquiring entrepreneurial firms that have already developed the technology that fits
their mission.
o The problem turns into the nature of assimilating cultures of both
organizations.
• Joint Venture - Firms establishing joint ownership to pursue new products or
markets. It results in combined ownership, usually between just two firms, to form a
new entity.
o Joint ventures are often appropriate for exploiting specific product
opportunities that may not be central to the firm’s mission. Such ventures are
more likely to work when the risks are known and can be equitably shared.
• Alliances - Cooperative agreements that allow firms to remain independent, but
pursue strategies consistent with their individual missions.
o When new products are central to the mission, but substantial resources are
required and sizable risk is present, then alliances may be a good strategy for
product development.
o Alliances are particularly beneficial when the products to be developed also
have technologies that are in ferment.
o Alliances are much more difficult to achieve and maintain than joint ventures
because of the ambiguities associated with them.
• The activities are organized into three process regions for each participant:
1. The direct interaction region includes process steps that involve interaction
between participants.
2. The surrogate (substitute) interaction region includes process steps in which
one participant is acting on another participant’s resources, such as their
information, materials, or technologies.
3. The independent processing region includes steps in which the sandwich
supplier and/or the sandwich customer is acting on resources where each has
maximum control.
• Service operations exist only within the area of direct and surrogate interaction.
• Firms wanting to achieve high economies of scale or more control in their operations
should probably position toward the independent processing region of their process
domain. Firms intending to provide a value offering that focuses on customization
should be positioned more toward the consumer’s process domain.