Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crisis Communication 1
Crisis Communication 1
Here are some ways to make the most out of your relationship with the media to effectively communicate in an
emergency.
Understand journalism deadlines and work to accommodate them. During a crisis, it is important to be
available—if necessary, around the clock—to help reporters get the facts right before their deadline.
The public wants to know what the responders know during a public health crisis. They view every move and watch
every passing emotion of those responding during a disaster, crisis, or emergency. In a crisis, every word counts.
Our job as public health and emergency communicators is to offer the information the public needs and counter
some of the harmful behaviors that are common during an emergency, so we can effectively support the public,
our colleagues, and the organizations that are offering help.
The material here cannot promise that you, as a community leader faced with an emergency, crisis, or disaster, will
overcome all communication challenges in a crisis by reading this book. However, by applying crisis and emergency
risk communication (CERC) principles, you can learn what to say, when to say it, and how to say it to help you
preserve or win the public’s trust. More importantly, it can save lives.
1. Be First: Crises are time-sensitive. Communicating information quickly is almost always important. For
members of the public, the first source of information often becomes the preferred source.
2. Be Right: Accuracy establishes credibility. Information can include what is known, what is not known, and
what is being done to fill in the gaps.
3. Be Credible: Honesty and truthfulness should not be compromised during crises.
4. Express Empathy: Crises create harm, and the suffering should be acknowledged in words. Addressing what
people are feeling, and the challenges they face, builds trust and rapport.
5. Promote Action: Giving people meaningful things to do calms anxiety, helps restore order, and promotes a
restored sense of control.
6. Show Respect: Respectful communication is particularly important when people feel vulnerable. Respectful
communication promotes cooperation and rapport.
Crisis Communication
The term “crisis communication” is generally used in two ways:
1. It describes the communication activities of an organization or agency facing a crisis. They need to
communicate about that crisis to their organization, various partners, and the public. Typically, a crisis: yyOccurs
unexpectedly
As an example, the 1984 Bhopal gas leak in India19 was a crisis confronted by an organization that faced
blame for the situation. The company faced legal challenges and negative public reactions for many years
after the crisis. This organization faced some legal or ethical responsibility for the crisis (unlike a disaster,
where, for example, a tornado does the damage). The public and many stakeholders judged the
organization based on their actions throughout the response.
1. The term “crisis communication” is associated more with emergency management and the need to inform and
alert the public about an event. In this case, crisis communication might refer to the community leaders’
efforts to inform the public.
For example, leaders might need to evacuate a community in advance of a hurricane. In this definition, the
organization is not facing a threat to its reputation or image. The effort to inform and warn the public is universally
recognized as important. Many public alert systems, like the old Emergency Broadcast System and the new
Commercial Mobile Alert System are based on this form of crisis communication.
Risk Communication
The field of environmental health elevated the prominence of risk communication. Through risk communication,
the communicator hopes to provide the audience with information about the expected type (good or bad) and
magnitude (weak or strong) of an outcome from a behavior or exposure. Typically, risk communication involves a
discussion about adverse outcomes, including the probabilities of those outcomes occurring. In some instances,
risk communication has been used to help an individual make a decision in response to many questions, including
the following:
In some cases, risk communication is used to help individuals adjust to something that has already occurred, such
as exposure to harmful carcinogens, possibly putting them at greater risk for cancer. Risk communication would
prepare people for that possibility. If warranted, the communication would offer steps to take to lower their
chance of dying from cancer, such as screenings.
Understanding the pattern of a crisis can help communicators anticipate problems and appropriately respond. For
communicators, it’s vital to know that every emergency, disaster, or crisis evolves in phases. The communication,
too, must evolve through these changes. By dividing the crisis into the following phases, the communicator can
anticipate the information needs of the media, agencies, organizations, and the general public. For each of these
phases, specific types of information need to be created and delivered to your audience.
Be prepared.
Foster alliances.
Develop consensus recommendations.
Test messages.
Sources: US Department of Health and Human Services;Crisis Emergency and Risk Communication. Be First, Be
Right, Be Credible. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014 ed.
Potter, Deborah and Ricchiardi, Sherry ; Disaster and Crisis Coverage; International Center for Joutnalists 2017